Notebookcheck Logo

Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1

The Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 is a mid range M.2 2280 PCIe NVMe SSD.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2
Capacity256 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced22.01.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
8.1 pt (9%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -92%
...
UDinfo HF3-25UB HF325UB256GBA2P
6.88 -15%
HIKVision HS-SSD-C100N M.2 SATA III SSD 256 GB
7.11 -13%
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
7.29 -10%
KUU-512GB
7.44 -9%
Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07
7.45 -8%
Lenovo UMIS AM610 RPFTJ256PDD2MWX
7.5 -8%
Apple SSD AP0256
7.78 -4%
FPT310M4SSD256G
7.86 -3%
Kimtigo KTB900SM28/512GB
7.9 -3%
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8.14
Netac NS512GSSD330
8.14 0%
FPT310M8SSD512G
8.17 0%
Faspeed P8-512G-SE
8.25 1%
Teclast BD256GB
8.36 3%
FPT330M8SSD512G
8.69 7%
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
9.24 14%
Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
9.5 17%
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
9.63 18%
Crucial P2 1TB CT1000P2SSD8
9.79 20%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 984%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 380.5     avg: 509     median: 478.5 (8%)     max: 735 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 315.2     avg: 374.6     median: 346 (13%)     max: 532 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 576     avg: 773     median: 608 (2%)     max: 1121 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 821     avg: 1931     median: 2109 (13%)     max: 2411 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 294     avg: 710     median: 765 (11%)     max: 799 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 360     avg: 820     median: 869 (14%)     max: 1073 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.044     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.07 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.072     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.173 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 190.2     avg: 561     median: 606 (10%)     max: 650 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 259.3     avg: 667     median: 726 (14%)     max: 896 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 53.5     avg: 82.6     median: 82.4 (16%)     max: 114.4 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 21.53     avg: 33.6     median: 26.4 (8%)     max: 54.8 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 219     avg: 668     median: 775 (7%)     max: 836 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 748     avg: 1195     median: 1306 (10%)     max: 1416 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
min: 232     avg: 334     median: 302.8 (28%)     max: 447.4 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
min: 297     avg: 370.1     median: 380.1 (29%)     max: 410.1 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
min: 58.2     avg: 78.6     median: 85.8 (3%)     max: 95 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
min: 23.25     avg: 31.6     median: 30.3 (1%)     max: 41.12 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
min: 264.2     avg: 604     median: 672 (7%)     max: 761 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
min: 382.5     avg: 563     median: 577 (12%)     max: 860 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
min: 257.6     avg: 666     median: 774 (7%)     max: 846 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
min: 706     avg: 877     median: 844 (10%)     max: 1128 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 58.4     avg: 141.1     median: 105.8 (10%)     max: 442.4 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 27.89     avg: 82.4     median: 33.4 (1%)     max: 371.1 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 270.8     avg: 722     median: 773 (4%)     max: 900 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 712     avg: 974     median: 879 (10%)     max: 1582 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 236.2     avg: 417.9     median: 373.8 (8%)     max: 868 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 348.7     avg: 571     median: 384.7 (6%)     max: 1580 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 253     avg: 717     median: 867 (6%)     max: 914 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 411.7     avg: 1413     median: 1583 (8%)     max: 1639 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 399.1     avg: 482.8     median: 402.3 (8%)     max: 647 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 680     avg: 684     median: 685 (10%)     max: 688 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
PCMark 8 - PCMark 8 Storage v2
min: 4233     avg: 4598     median: 4729 (92%)     max: 4833 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HD Tune Transfer Rate Minimum - HD Tune Transfer Rate Minimum
61 MB/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HD Tune Transfer Rate Average - HD Tune Transfer Rate Average
97.9 MB/s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
HD Tune Transfer Rate Maximum - HD Tune Transfer Rate Maximum
131.7 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 54.8     avg: 58     median: 58 (13%)     max: 61.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 25.02     avg: 25.1     median: 25.1 (7%)     max: 25.19 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 256.4     avg: 257     median: 257.1 (4%)     max: 257.7 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 247.9     avg: 249.5     median: 249.5 (3%)     max: 251.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 858     avg: 862     median: 862 (8%)     max: 866 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 631     avg: 659     median: 659 (8%)     max: 687 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 950     avg: 965     median: 965 (7%)     max: 980 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 1030     avg: 1032     median: 1031.5 (6%)     max: 1033 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 27. 08:04:39

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 27 Feb 2026 01:44:18 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3311 +0.025s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 3311 +0.013s ... 0.042s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.042s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +4.182s ... 4.224s

#10 return log +0.542s ... 4.765s

Notebook reviews with Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1

Intel Frost Canyon NUC offers 6 cores and 12 threads

Intel Frost Canyon NUC offers 6 cores and 12 threads

The new Intel Performance Kit NUC10i7FNHAA packs two storage devices, 16 GB of memory and a modern hexa-core SoC into a tiny case. We have summarized here how well the Intel NUC 10 performed in the test.
Intel Core i7-10710U, UHD Graphics 620, 697 g
Intel Frost Canyon NUC with Comet Lake i5 SoC in Review

Intel Frost Canyon NUC with Comet Lake i5 SoC in Review

Intel's latest NUC series is small but powerful. It packs brand-new more powerful hardware into a well-known case. Find out in our review what the consequences of this upgrade are and what else the new Comet Lake SoC have to offer.
Intel Core i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 493 g
Acer TravelMate X514-51-511Q

Acer TravelMate X514 Laptop Review: A small 14-inch machine with professionals in mind

Acer markets the TravelMate X514-51 as being particularly small and lightweight, and it does not disappoint in that regard. Our tests will determine whether this Whiskey Lake business laptop is up to scratch, though.
Intel Core i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 14", 980 g
MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD

Review of the MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD: Low-priced Gaming Laptop with a 144 Hz Panel

The MSI GP75 Leopard promises to deliver a good gaming performance at a budget price. With the hardware that the MSI GP75 offers, all modern titles should be playable in Full HD at the very least. We reveal in the following review what gamers who are not interested in 4K gaming, can expect from the MSI GP75 Leopard.
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 17.3", 2.6 kg
MSI GF75 Thin 8RD (i7-8750H, GTX 1050Ti Max-Q) Laptop Review

MSI GF75 Thin 8RD (i7-8750H, GTX 1050Ti Max-Q) Laptop Review

"Make it thin and light." This is probably what the engineers at MSI heard when being given the task of creating the MSI GF75 8RD. And the result is: thin and light. But how does the flyweight gamer fare under full load? After all, the MSI GF75 is not made for office work. It is directed at the gaming community. Can the thin MSI keep up with the high demands of gaming or might this design have taken its toll on the laptop's abilities?
Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q, 17.3", 2.2 kg

MSI GE75 8SF: Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  Review » MSI GE75 Raider 8SF (i7-8750H, RTX 2070) Laptop Review

Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ: Intel Core i5-8250U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313 (Core i5-8250U, 8 GB, 256 SSD, FHD) Laptop Review

MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD: Intel Core i7-9750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI GP75 Leopard 9SD

MSI GE75 8SF: Intel Core i7-8750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 17.30", 2.6 kg
  External Review » MSI GE75 8SF

Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ: Intel Core i5-8250U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 13.30", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Acer Swift 3 SF313-51-59SZ

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-07-31)