Notebookcheck Logo

Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC

WDBNCE5000PNC

The WD Blue 3D NAND SATA SSD 500GB is a relatively fast SATA 3 SSD. It uses the 2.5" form factor and offers peak read and write rates of 560 / 530 MB/s (with the SLC cache). It uses a Marvell 88SS1074 controller with 4 channels and 512 MB DDR3L / SLC cache. Western Digital specifies the power consumption of the drive at 3.8W in use and 0.056W in idle.

TypeSSD
Size2.5
Capacity500 GB
InterfaceSATA III
ControllerMarvell 88SS1074
Announced05.08.2019

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
9.5 pt (11%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -93%
...
FPT310M4SSD256G
7.86 -17%
Kimtigo KTB900SM28/512GB
7.9 -17%
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1
8.14 -14%
Netac NS512GSSD330
8.14 -14%
FPT310M8SSD512G
8.17 -14%
Faspeed P8-512G-SE
8.25 -13%
Teclast BD256GB
8.36 -12%
FPT330M8SSD512G
8.69 -9%
Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ
9.24 -3%
Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC
9.5
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 512GB
9.63 1%
Crucial P2 1TB CT1000P2SSD8
9.79 3%
SK hynix HFB1M8MQ331C0MR
10.1 6%
Samsung SSD 860 Evo 256GB M.2
10.4 9%
Kingston OM8SEP4256Q-A0
10.9 15%
Apple SSD SM0512F
10.9 15%
Foresee 512GB
10.9 15%
Apple SSD AP0512
11.1 17%
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG
11.2 18%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 828%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
248.9 MB/s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
191.9 MB/s (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
482.5 MB/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
1023 Points (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
324 Points (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
457 Points (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
0.1 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
0.1 ms (0%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
193.7 MB/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
369.4 MB/s (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
88.5 MB/s (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
36.8 MB/s (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
413.8 MB/s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
507 MB/s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
105.9 MB/s (10%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
39.2 MB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
320.5 MB/s (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
342.1 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
514 MB/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
554 MB/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
330.8 MB/s (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
391.8 MB/s (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
104 MB/s (24%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
40.1 MB/s (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
307 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
394 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
470 MB/s (5%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
490 MB/s (6%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
515 MB/s (4%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
544 MB/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
549 MB/s (3%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 13. 17:14:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 09 Mar 2026 03:36:25 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3571 +0.033s ... 0.039s

#7 got single benchmarks 3571 +0.004s ... 0.043s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.279s ... 3.322s

#10 return log +0.127s ... 3.449s

Notebook reviews with Western Digital WD Blue 3D WDBNCE5000PNC

Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano Desktop Hands-On

Zotac ZBOX MI642 Nano Desktop Hands-On

Zotac's ZBOX Nano Desktop gets a Comet Lake upgrade. While the new CPU brings a small bump in performance, stagnant graphics and stability issues will leave some users dissatisfied. The more powerful Tiger Lake CPUs or Ryzen APUs may better meet the needs of most consumers. However, those who want a desktop with a small footprint may find the ZBOX Nano a decent option for home and office use.
Intel Core i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 472 g
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-10-16)