Notebookcheck Logo

Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428

AZW 512G

The Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428 or also identified simply as SSD 512G in Windows 10 is a mid range PCIe SSD in the M.2 2280 form factor.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2
Capacity512 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced24.08.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
6.8 pt (8%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -90%
...
Transcend TS120GMTS420S
6.3 -7%
Silicon Motion SM2258XT 256GB
6.3 -7%
SEAPIY E535N 512GB
6.36 -6%
Lexar 128GB SSD
6.55 -4%
Netac SSD 256GB
6.57 -3%
Kingston RBUSNS4180S3128GJ
6.7 -1%
Crucial BX500 1TB CT1000BX500SSD1
6.7 -1%
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3256GJ
6.72 -1%
Netac NS512GSSD340
6.73 -1%
Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428
6.79
UDinfo HF3-25UB HF325UB256GBA2P
6.88 1%
HIKVision HS-SSD-C100N M.2 SATA III SSD 256 GB
7.11 5%
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ
7.29 7%
KUU-512GB
7.44 10%
Samsung PM881 MZNLH512HALU-0000/07
7.45 10%
Lenovo UMIS AM610 RPFTJ256PDD2MWX
7.5 10%
Apple SSD AP0256
7.78 15%
FPT310M4SSD256G
7.86 16%
Kimtigo KTB900SM28/512GB
7.9 16%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 1199%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 397.8     avg: 501     median: 446 (7%)     max: 658 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 77.24     avg: 158.2     median: 135.7 (5%)     max: 261.7 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 553     avg: 811     median: 652.4 (2%)     max: 1228 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 615     avg: 1207     median: 628 (4%)     max: 2377 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 298     avg: 558     median: 321 (4%)     max: 1054 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 198     avg: 427.7     median: 216 (3%)     max: 869 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.114     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.188 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.063     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.173 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 181.26     avg: 416.5     median: 254.3 (4%)     max: 814 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 135.7     avg: 326     median: 146.3 (3%)     max: 696 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 30.16     avg: 67.1     median: 72.6 (14%)     max: 98.6 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 10.74     avg: 21.7     median: 18.9 (6%)     max: 35.27 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 364.5     avg: 740     median: 443.5 (4%)     max: 1413 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 503.32     avg: 799     median: 512 (4%)     max: 1382 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 32.99     avg: 93.8     median: 86.5 (8%)     max: 161.9 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 18.85     avg: 32.5     median: 25.9 (1%)     max: 52.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 379.8     avg: 406.4     median: 406.4 (2%)     max: 432.9 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 477.6     avg: 485.1     median: 485.1 (5%)     max: 492.6 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 159.7     avg: 203.3     median: 165.1 (3%)     max: 285 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 117.4     avg: 196     median: 146.6 (2%)     max: 324 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 359.5     avg: 788     median: 426.6 (3%)     max: 1579 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 523     avg: 1023     median: 528.3 (3%)     max: 2018 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
530 MB/s (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
738 MB/s (11%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 41.3     avg: 86.4     median: 74.8 (17%)     max: 143 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 13     avg: 25.3     median: 23.3 (7%)     max: 39.5 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 113     avg: 243     median: 220 (3%)     max: 396 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 136     avg: 351.7     median: 178.1 (2%)     max: 741 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 304     avg: 734     median: 461 (4%)     max: 1438 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 402     avg: 797     median: 488 (6%)     max: 1502 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 295     avg: 736     median: 462 (3%)     max: 1450 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 448     avg: 931     median: 502 (3%)     max: 1844 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 458     avg: 933     median: 490 (3%)     max: 1850 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 09. 20:25:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Feb 2026 01:05:03 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3540 +0.036s ... 0.044s

#7 got single benchmarks 3540 +0.01s ... 0.054s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.054s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.861s ... 3.914s

#10 return log +0.778s ... 4.693s

Notebook reviews with Silicon Motion AZW 512G NV428

Celeron N5105 Jasper Lake debut: Beelink U59 mini PC review

Celeron N5105 Jasper Lake debut: Beelink U59 mini PC review

Beelink has updated its inexpensive U59 mini PC with more RAM and a new Intel Celeron CPU without needing to jack up the price. How much of a performance boost can users really expect?
Intel Celeron N5105, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU), 320 g
Intel Celeron N5095 Jasper Lake benchmarked: Beelink U59 mini PC review

Intel Celeron N5095 Jasper Lake benchmarked: Beelink U59 mini PC review

Intel's latest 10 nm Celeron CPU is making strides when it comes to overall processor performance. Multi-thread performance in particular rivals the Core i3-1005G1, but the integrated GPU remains disappointing.
Intel Celeron N5095, UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU), 329 g
Beelink GT-R Mini Desktop Review

Beelink GT-R Mini Desktop Review

The Beelink GT-R is a pluck Ryzen-powered mini desktop that has a lot to offer. Its build quality is excellent, and its performance is fairly good for a small-form-factor PC, but some small quirks and a high price tag may keep it off some people's desks.
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H, Vega 8, 843 g
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2020-08-24)