Notebookcheck Logo

321JN1024GB-TX01

321JN1024GB-TX01

The 321JN1024GB-TX01 (ELFO00.6) is a high end NVMe SSD found in the Huawei MateBook 16s i9. Manufacturer or other information is not available, other than the drive running with 3.3V.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced12.06.2023

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
44 pt (50%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -98%
...
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1032
43.2 -2%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
43.2 -2%
Phison PS5021-E21 1TB
43.3 -2%
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI
43.3 -2%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
43.4 -1%
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
43.5 -1%
Acer N7000 2 TB
43.5 -1%
SSSTC CA6-8D512
43.6 -1%
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS1000G
43.8 0%
321JN1024GB-TX01
44
Kingston KC3000 512G SKC3000S512G
44.5 1%
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS500G
44.9 2%
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
45.9 4%
Corsair MP600 GS
45.9 4%
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
46.1 5%
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
46.2 5%
SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N
46.2 5%
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
46.6 6%
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E
47.1 7%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 100%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 1538.95     avg: 1830     median: 1829.5 (31%)     max: 2120.09 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 1133     avg: 1267     median: 1267.2 (47%)     max: 1401.38 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 2546.01     avg: 2636     median: 2636.2 (10%)     max: 2726.43 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 7876     avg: 7959     median: 7958.5 (49%)     max: 8041 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 3532     avg: 3577     median: 3576.5 (50%)     max: 3621 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 2885     avg: 2915     median: 2915 (47%)     max: 2945 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.031     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.054 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.029     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.074 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 2859     avg: 2924     median: 2924.3 (49%)     max: 2989.61 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 2377     avg: 2407     median: 2407.2 (47%)     max: 2437.31 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 316.53     avg: 322.3     median: 322.3 (63%)     max: 328 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 97.4     avg: 97.9     median: 97.9 (31%)     max: 98.45 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 3147.93     avg: 3296     median: 3296.5 (29%)     max: 3445 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4093.46     avg: 4099     median: 4099.2 (32%)     max: 4105 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
319 MB/s (29%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
79.3 MB/s (2%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
597 MB/s (12%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
972 MB/s (14%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
3938 MB/s (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
4899 MB/s (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
2525 MB/s (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
1717 MB/s (26%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 376     avg: 377     median: 377 (87%)     max: 378 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 77.3     avg: 77.4     median: 77.4 (22%)     max: 77.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 3115     avg: 3435     median: 3434.5 (51%)     max: 3754 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 2928     avg: 2933     median: 2933 (36%)     max: 2938 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3877     avg: 3905     median: 3904.5 (38%)     max: 3932 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2471     avg: 2511     median: 2510.5 (30%)     max: 2550 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 3880     avg: 3911     median: 3911 (27%)     max: 3942 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 4899     avg: 4904     median: 4903.5 (30%)     max: 4908 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 4895     avg: 4896     median: 4895.5 (30%)     max: 4896 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 18. 09:00:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 17 Feb 2026 01:12:05 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4007 +0.019s ... 0.026s

#7 got single benchmarks 4007 +0.005s ... 0.031s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.842s ... 3.873s

#10 return log +0.711s ... 4.585s

Notebook reviews with 321JN1024GB-TX01

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 review - A multimedia laptop now with the Intel Core i9-13900H

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024 review - A multimedia laptop now with the Intel Core i9-13900H

Huawei has equipped the 2024 model of its multimedia laptop, the MateBook D 16, with an Intel Core i9-13900H processor. However, it is held back by its power limits. Severe cuts have been made, especially regarding the ports but, by contrast, the battery life has improved.
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 16", 1.7 kg
Huawei MateBook 16s 2023 review - Multimedia laptop now with a brighter 3:2 display

Huawei MateBook 16s 2023 review - Multimedia laptop now with a brighter 3:2 display

With the MateBook 16s, Huawei offers large multimedia laptops with Intel processors. Now in 2023, it includes the current Core i9 of the Raptor Lake H series and a brighter display. In our test, the premium laptop from China shows its many strengths and few weaknesses.
Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 16", 2 kg

Huawei MateBook D 16 2024: Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16.00", 1.7 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook D 16 2024

Huawei MateBook 16s i9: Intel Core i9-13900H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Huawei MateBook 16s i9

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-01-18)