Notebookcheck Logo

MasonSemi 1TB MC7000

1TB MC7000

The MasonSemi 1TB MC7000 is a fast NVMe M.2 2280 SSD using PCIe 4.0x4. It is made in China and our test model had the serial number MC23410924800279 and using Firmware SN13683 202310.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced03.04.2024

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
49.5 pt (56%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.717 -99%
...
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
46.7 -6%
321JN1024GB-TX01
46.9 -5%
SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X186N
47.9 -3%
Kingston KC3000 512G SKC3000S512G
48 -3%
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
48.4 -2%
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRS500G
48.4 -2%
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5
49.2 -1%
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
49.2 -1%
Corsair MP600 GS
49.4 0%
MasonSemi 1TB MC7000
49.5
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E
49.6 0%
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
49.6 0%
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
50.1 1%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0
51.4 4%
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
52.9 7%
2x Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB (RAID 0)
53.5 8%
2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)
54 9%
SK Hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X125N
54.2 9%
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
54.5 10%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 4TB
87.8 77%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 2245.06     avg: 2315     median: 2314.6 (39%)     max: 2384.21 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 872.67     avg: 944     median: 943.6 (35%)     max: 1014.51 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 3176.96     avg: 3328     median: 3327.8 (12%)     max: 3478.65 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 7509     avg: 7714     median: 7713.5 (47%)     max: 7918 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2593     avg: 2797     median: 2796.5 (39%)     max: 3000 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
3258 Points (52%)
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.195     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.196 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.06     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.079 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1879.53     avg: 2056     median: 2055.5 (35%)     max: 2231.47 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 2610.4     avg: 2612     median: 2612.2 (51%)     max: 2614.06 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 148.58     avg: 169.3     median: 169.3 (33%)     max: 190.06 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 65.5     avg: 66.6     median: 66.6 (21%)     max: 67.66 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 5653.88     avg: 5719     median: 5718.6 (51%)     max: 5783.3 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 5766.47     avg: 5796     median: 5795.8 (45%)     max: 5825.09 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 230.1     avg: 233.1     median: 233.1 (21%)     max: 236.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 74.23     avg: 80.4     median: 80.4 (2%)     max: 86.48 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 5591     avg: 5603     median: 5603 (30%)     max: 5615 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 4765     avg: 4860     median: 4859.5 (55%)     max: 4954 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 669.6     avg: 713     median: 712.5 (15%)     max: 755.4 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 854.6     avg: 914     median: 913.6 (13%)     max: 972.6 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 6625     avg: 6646     median: 6645.5 (44%)     max: 6666 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 7049     avg: 7059     median: 7058.5 (38%)     max: 7068 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 205     avg: 222     median: 222 (51%)     max: 239 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 71     avg: 75.3     median: 75.3 (22%)     max: 79.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 3232     avg: 3608     median: 3607.5 (54%)     max: 3983 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 2243     avg: 2353     median: 2353 (29%)     max: 2463 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 5556     avg: 5576     median: 5575.5 (54%)     max: 5595 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 3703     avg: 3743     median: 3743 (44%)     max: 3783 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 6647     avg: 6658     median: 6658 (46%)     max: 6669 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 7066     avg: 7068     median: 7067.5 (44%)     max: 7069 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 7035     avg: 7044     median: 7044 (43%)     max: 7053 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200530054005500560057005800590060006100620063006400650066006700680069007000Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 25. 14:09:45

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 24 Mar 2026 04:00:35 +0100 +0.006s ... 0.006s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.011s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4138 +0.047s ... 0.057s

#7 got single benchmarks 4138 +0.007s ... 0.065s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.065s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.705s ... 3.77s

#10 return log +0.507s ... 4.277s

Notebook reviews with MasonSemi 1TB MC7000

GMK NucBox K9 mini PC review: Core Ultra 5 125H with Arc 7 graphics

GMK NucBox K9 mini PC review: Core Ultra 5 125H with Arc 7 graphics

The Core Ultra 5 125H may make for a smarter PC, but that doesn't necessarily mean a faster one. Raw performance sits behind the older and cheaper Ryzen 7 7840HS by decent margins.
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, 528 g
GMK NucBox K6 mini PC review: As powerful as the latest Intel Core Ultra laptops

GMK NucBox K6 mini PC review: As powerful as the latest Intel Core Ultra laptops

The mini PC comes with 16 GB of RAM, 1 TB of storage, and a powerful Ryzen 7 7840HS all for under $500 to be an attractive alternative to the Intel NUC. There are a few drawbacks for sure, but they pale in comparison to the longer list of strengths.
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M, 514 g
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-04- 3)