Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU

PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU

The Samsung OEM Client SSD PM9A1a 1TB, M.2 (MZVL21T0HDLU-00B07, OEM variant of the 980 Pro) is a fast M.2 2280 SSD which supports PCIe 4.0 x4. It most likely uses the Samsung Elpis (S4LV003) Controller with 8 channels and 512 MB LPDDR4. The memory modules are from Samsung (3D-NAND TLC 136 layers). The 1TB version is specified at 7000 MB/s and 5100 MB/s write (SLC cached). 

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced04.10.2023
LinkSamsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
30.1 pt (34%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -98%
...
Corsair MP600
29 -4%
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT512G
29 -4%
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
29 -4%
Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
29.2 -3%
Acer N5000
29.3 -3%
Phison Electronics PS5012
29.3 -3%
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
29.8 -1%
Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA
29.9 -1%
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
30 0%
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
30.1
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
30.3 1%
Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162
30.4 1%
SK Hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X169N
30.4 1%
WDC PC SN810 2TB
30.6 2%
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
30.6 2%
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
30.6 2%
Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
30.6 2%
Kioxia KXG8AZNV2T04 V2
30.7 2%
Lexar SSD NM7A1 1TB
31 3%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 193%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 322.79     avg: 1717     median: 1690 (28%)     max: 3442.64 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 222.39     avg: 768     median: 749.2 (28%)     max: 1329.32 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 550.52     avg: 2295     median: 2353.2 (9%)     max: 4097.63 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4533     avg: 6168     median: 5414 (33%)     max: 9056 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2703     avg: 3289     median: 3324 (46%)     max: 4018 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1283     avg: 1964     median: 1437 (23%)     max: 3368 Points
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.019     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.027 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.025     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.064 ms
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 2278     avg: 2797     median: 2876 (49%)     max: 3338.79 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 705     avg: 1376     median: 844 (17%)     max: 2721.41 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 146.2     avg: 179.6     median: 178.6 (35%)     max: 231.38 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 63.9     avg: 71.2     median: 70.6 (22%)     max: 84.56 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2443     avg: 3121     median: 2696 (24%)     max: 4482.43 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 4589.8     avg: 5163     median: 5245 (41%)     max: 5622.8 MB/s
+ 7 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
min: 325.5     avg: 471.2     median: 400.4 (37%)     max: 687.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
min: 379.9     avg: 531     median: 431.7 (33%)     max: 780.5 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
min: 118.6     avg: 164.9     median: 137.2 (4%)     max: 238.9 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
min: 53.31     avg: 67.7     median: 66.5 (1%)     max: 83.36 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
min: 2158     avg: 2725     median: 2374 (26%)     max: 3642 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
min: 2292     avg: 2513     median: 2352 (50%)     max: 2894 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
min: 2949     avg: 3430     median: 3157 (30%)     max: 4183 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
min: 3428     avg: 3650     median: 3556 (40%)     max: 3966 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 115.8     avg: 226.7     median: 235.4 (21%)     max: 384.4 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 67.06     avg: 153.2     median: 83.1 (2%)     max: 453.5 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 2679     avg: 4112     median: 4342 (23%)     max: 5083 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 3386     avg: 4634     median: 4159 (47%)     max: 6833 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 323.6     avg: 450     median: 402 (8%)     max: 588 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 384.6     avg: 546     median: 439.5 (6%)     max: 766 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 4991.1     avg: 5125     median: 5137 (34%)     max: 5225 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 7054.3     avg: 7080     median: 7084.6 (38%)     max: 7093.5 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 315.5     avg: 960     median: 385.8 (8%)     max: 2752.2 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 1002.6     avg: 1502     median: 1051.3 (16%)     max: 2902.5 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 106.2     avg: 157.9     median: 136.3 (31%)     max: 270 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 57.3     avg: 70.2     median: 68.9 (20%)     max: 95.2 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 349     avg: 1147     median: 423 (6%)     max: 3717 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 635     avg: 1545     median: 910 (11%)     max: 3896 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 2298     avg: 3259     median: 3199 (31%)     max: 4533 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 3028     avg: 3467     median: 3463 (41%)     max: 4104 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 4913     avg: 4991     median: 4957 (34%)     max: 5265 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 6023     avg: 6878     median: 6999 (43%)     max: 7058 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 5302     avg: 6745     median: 6980 (43%)     max: 7023 MB/s
+ 9 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900200021002200230024002500260027002800290030003100320033003400350036003700380039004000410042004300440045004600470048004900500051005200530054005500560057005800590060006100620063006400650066006700680069007000Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Amazon Logo
  • Samsung PM9A1 MZ-VL21T100 1TB PCIe 4.0 NVMe 2280 Solid State Drive, 7000MB/s Read, 5200MB/s Write, 1000K IOPS Ran. Read, 850K IOPS Ran. Write - PM9A1
  • Mavark New PM9A1 MZ-VL21T0A Solid State Drive 1TB Internal M.2 PCI Express GEN4 X4 OEM for XPS 13 15 17 Yoga 9i 7i Spectre x360 2-in-1 Laptops Plus Best Notebook Pen Light (1TB Gen 4x4 SSD)
  • Samsung SSD 1TB PM9A1 NVMe PCIe 4.0 MZVL21T0HCLR Solid State Drive for Dell 980 Pro HP 02DY5T Lenovo Laptop Desktop PS5 Console

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 19. 00:18:31

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 17 Feb 2026 01:12:05 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4067 +0.03s ... 0.036s

#7 got single benchmarks 4067 +0.025s ... 0.061s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +4.088s ... 4.149s

#10 return log +0.551s ... 4.7s

Notebook reviews with Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU

Lightweight with power and 20 hours of endurance - LG Gram Pro 16 laptop review

Lightweight with power and 20 hours of endurance - LG Gram Pro 16 laptop review

As a long-distance runner with a powerful Core Ultra 7, the LG Gram Pro 16 is a strong companion for traveling. But the laptop also impresses at home and for entertainment with its brilliant sound and picture.
Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, Arc 140V, 16", 1.2 kg
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ mini-PC review - A potential desktop killer at just 622 grams

Asus NUC 14 Pro+ mini-PC review - A potential desktop killer at just 622 grams

The Asus NUC 14 Pro+ promises to deliver impressive performance in a compact form factor, with the latest processors and massive power. But how does it perform in everyday use? In this review, we put the NUC 14 Pro+ to the test to see if it lives up to its promises and whether it can truly serve as a valid desktop replacement.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 622 g
Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny review: Mini workstation with Intel Core i9-14900, 64 GB RAM and Nvidia T1000

Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny review: Mini workstation with Intel Core i9-14900, 64 GB RAM and Nvidia T1000

The Lenovo ThinkStation P3 Tiny with Intel Core i9-14900 and Nvidia T1000 impresses with extreme performance in the smallest of spaces. In our test, we analyze how much power this mini PC packs. Find out in the article whether the compact workstation lives up to the high expectations!
Intel Core i9-14900, NVIDIA T1000, 1.5 kg
Asus ROG NUC gaming mini PC review: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 laptop in a 2.5-liter case

Asus ROG NUC gaming mini PC review: Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 laptop in a 2.5-liter case

The Asus ROG NUC is an extremely compact powerhouse and is primarily aimed at gamers. The combination of Intel Core Ultra 9 185H and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 laptop promises a lot. We use numerous measurements and benchmarks to analyze the expected performance level and how well the compact gaming PC performed in our test course.
Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 2.6 kg
Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 and DCI-P3 panel

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) review: Gaming laptop with RTX 4070 and DCI-P3 panel

The Helio Neo 16 offers a bright and color-accurate 16-inch display (2560x1600 pixels, 240 Hz, DCI-P3) in the 16:10 format, 32 GB of RAM, and two Thunderbolt 4 ports (Power Delivery). The powerful laptop is run by a Core i7-14700HX together with a GeForce RTX 4070.
Intel Core i7-14700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16", 2.6 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 AMD Laptop Review: Ryzen power in the compact ThinkPad

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 review: Business laptop is better with AMD Zen4

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE: Intel Core i7-1355U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 Intel Laptop Review: OLED instead of battery life

LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G: Intel Core Ultra 7 256V Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 16.00", 1.2 kg
  External Review » LG Gram Pro 16Z90TS-G.AU89G

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024): Intel Core i7-14700HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
  External Review » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 PHN16-72

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE: Intel Core i7-1355U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE

Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024): Intel Core i7-14700HX NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 16.00", 2.6 kg
   » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) gaming laptop with full-power RTX 4060 drops to lowest price ever

   » Speedy Acer Predator Helios 18 gaming laptop with RTX 4090 and 250 Hz mini-LED display drops back to record-low price

   » Acer Predator Helios Neo 16 (2024) with a bright display, RTX 4070, and Thunderbolt 4

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 21K4S02000: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U AMD Radeon 780M, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G4 AMD needs upgradable RAM

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4 21F6005GGE: Intel Core i7-1355U Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4: Intel models are better for single core tasks

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-10- 4)