Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU

PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU

The MZVLC1T0HFLU is a 1-TB Samsung PM9E1-series NVMe SSD that makes use of four PCIe 5 lanes along with modern NAND chips, DRAM cache and controller, promising data transfer rates up to 14 GB/s (reads) with sequential writes not far behind at up to 12.5 GB/s.

Performance

With 4.91 GB/s sequential reads and 7.21 writes (AS SSD 2), the 22 by 80 drive falls short of the rates promised by quite a margin. The silver lining is, there is no throttling under prolonged loads.

Its 2-TB sibling performs noticeably faster.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
ControllerIn-house Samsung controller
Announced04.10.2024
LinkSamsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
36.4 pt (41%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.719 -98%
...
SK hynix HFS512GEJ9X125N
34.5 -5%
SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N
34.7 -5%
Samsung 990 Pro 2 TB MZVL72T0HDLB
34.7 -5%
WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-1T00
34.9 -4%
Kingston OM8PGP41024N-A0
35.1 -4%
Phison EM2804TBMTCB47
35.3 -3%
SK Hynix HFS002TEJ9X162N
36.1 -1%
SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N
36.2 -1%
Kingston OM8PGP41024Q-A0
36.3 0%
Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU
36.4
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10
36.4 0%
SK Hynix Gold P31 1TB SHGP31-1000GM-2
36.5 0%
Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
36.5 0%
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
37.2 2%
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
37.6 3%
TeamGroup T-Force G50 TM8FFE004T
37.7 4%
Micron 2400 MTFDKCD1T0QFM
37.7 4%
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
38.2 5%
Samsung PM9C1a MZ9L81T0HDLB
38.3 5%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5
88.1 142%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 1354.91     avg: 1606     median: 1524.8 (25%)     max: 1937.8 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 864.17     avg: 896     median: 893.9 (33%)     max: 929.18 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 2879.4     avg: 3377     median: 3414.6 (13%)     max: 3837.28 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 4455     avg: 6553     median: 6123 (38%)     max: 9082 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 2304     avg: 3264     median: 3620 (50%)     max: 3867 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1553     avg: 2251     median: 1571 (25%)     max: 3629 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.022     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.051 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.023     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.039 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 1709     avg: 2673     median: 2918 (49%)     max: 3391.52 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 622     avg: 1514     median: 938.8 (18%)     max: 2980 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 144.7     avg: 173.4     median: 170.4 (33%)     max: 205.12 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 61.6     avg: 73.1     median: 76.5 (24%)     max: 81.11 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 2701.38     avg: 4174     median: 4503 (40%)     max: 5318 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 5511.22     avg: 6646     median: 5722 (45%)     max: 8704 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 150.9     avg: 193.5     median: 193.5 (17%)     max: 236 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 65.23     avg: 77.5     median: 77.5 (2%)     max: 89.7 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
3762 MB/s (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
4510 MB/s (54%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 458     avg: 583     median: 582.5 (12%)     max: 707 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 595.3     avg: 696     median: 695.7 (10%)     max: 796 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 6112     avg: 6495     median: 6495 (43%)     max: 6878 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 7094     avg: 7109     median: 7108.5 (38%)     max: 7123 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
2434 MB/s (49%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
3004 MB/s (45%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 132     avg: 163.3     median: 142.9 (33%)     max: 215 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 65.2     avg: 77.1     median: 76.6 (22%)     max: 89.5 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 417     avg: 1385     median: 447 (7%)     max: 3291 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 750     avg: 2034     median: 858 (11%)     max: 4495 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3358     avg: 4232     median: 3678 (36%)     max: 5660 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 4612     avg: 4689     median: 4681 (61%)     max: 4773 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 6669     avg: 7790     median: 6886 (47%)     max: 9814 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 7112     avg: 9137     median: 7135 (44%)     max: 13163 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 7099     avg: 8579     median: 7126 (44%)     max: 11511 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068006900700071007200730074007500760077007800790080008100820083008400850086008700880089009000910092009300940095009600970098009900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 17. 11:13:54

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 14 Dec 2025 00:24:59 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4330 +0.015s ... 0.021s

#7 got single benchmarks 4330 +0.008s ... 0.029s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.853s ... 0.882s

#10 return log +0.001s ... 0.883s

Notebook reviews with Samsung PM9E1 1 TB MZVLC1T0HFLU

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 16 Gen 8 review: Tandem OLED series premiere

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 16 Gen 8 review: Tandem OLED series premiere

The ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 may look the same as the previous generation model, but the new tandem OLED display option can improve the HDR viewing experience tremendo...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255H | NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop | 16.00" | 1.9 kg
This is how Intel beats AMD: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 laptop review

This is how Intel beats AMD: Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 laptop review

Intel Arrow Lake, AMD Krackan Point, Intel Lunar Lake - Lenovo has three different versions of the ThinkPad T14 Gen 6. We review one with Lunar Lake, and yet ag...
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | Intel Arc Graphics 140V | 14.00" | 1.5 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s 2-in-1 Gen1 Review - New business convertible raises questions

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s 2-in-1 Gen1 Review - New business convertible raises questions

Lenovo has a new business convertible called the ThinkPad T14s 2-in-1. It offers plenty of business features as well as 5G connectivity, but the combination of ...
Intel Core Ultra 7 255U | Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) | 14.00" | 1.4 kg

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s 2in1 Gen1: Intel Core Ultra 7 255U Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T14s 2in1 Gen1

Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8: Intel Core Ultra 7 255H NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Generation Laptop, 16.00", 1.9 kg
  External Review » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8

   » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 with tandem OLED is insanely bright at almost 1500 nits

   » Lenovo ThinkPad P1 Gen 8 drops AC adapter port, switches to smaller USB-C charging only

Lenovo ThinkPad T14 Gen 6 21QG001VGE: Intel Core Ultra 7 258V Intel Arc Graphics 140V, 14.00", 1.5 kg
   » New battery life record: This CPU makes the best known business laptop more efficient

Lenovo ThinkPad T14s 2in1 Gen1: Intel Core Ultra 7 255U Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake), 14.00", 1.4 kg
   » Intel's Arrow Lake processor is the worst choice for the Lenovo ThinkPad T14s 2-in-1

   » Lenovo's new business convertible ThinkPad T14s 2-in-1 suffers from the 60 Hz display

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-10-28)