Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB

MZVL41T0HBLB

The Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW is a mid-range PCIe Gen4x4 M.2 SSD in the 2280 form factor. It most likely uses a Samsung controller.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced05.09.2022

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
30.4 pt (37%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.743 -98%
...
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
29.9 -2%
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4
29.9 -2%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
30 -1%
PSEIB512GABBMC0
30.1 -1%
Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
30.1 -1%
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G
30.3 0%
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N
30.3 0%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 500GB
30.3 0%
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
30.4 0%
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
30.4
WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
30.5 0%
Gofatoo 512GB
30.7 1%
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
30.7 1%
Solidigm SSDPFINW512GZL
30.7 1%
Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
30.7 1%
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
30.8 1%
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV512G
30.8 1%
Wodposit NVMe SSD 1024 GB
30.9 2%
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00
31 2%
...
Samsung 9100 Pro 2 TB
82.7 172%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 234.79     avg: 1146     median: 1495.6 (25%)     max: 1707.57 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 94.68     avg: 482     median: 286.5 (11%)     max: 1064.94 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 182.71     avg: 1573     median: 2167.7 (20%)     max: 2369.16 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 2242     avg: 3625     median: 3056 (22%)     max: 5577 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1015     avg: 1680     median: 1873 (26%)     max: 2151 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 812     avg: 1304     median: 820 (17%)     max: 2279 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.03     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.049 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.035     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.109 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 618     avg: 1312     median: 1631 (28%)     max: 1688.15 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 463     avg: 951     median: 498 (14%)     max: 1890.81 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 66.5     avg: 152.8     median: 184 (36%)     max: 207.87 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 34.6     avg: 59.3     median: 69.2 (22%)     max: 74.2 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1759     avg: 2147     median: 2127 (19%)     max: 2554.35 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 2793     avg: 2938     median: 2885 (23%)     max: 3136.99 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 114.6     avg: 175.4     median: 175.4 (16%)     max: 236.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 58.6     avg: 70.5     median: 70.5 (2%)     max: 82.48 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
2764 MB/s (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
2761 MB/s (33%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 395     avg: 430     median: 430 (14%)     max: 465 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 314     avg: 496     median: 496 (8%)     max: 677.9 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 3035     avg: 3044     median: 3044 (20%)     max: 3053 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3664     avg: 3667     median: 3666.5 (20%)     max: 3669 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
655 MB/s (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
1145 MB/s (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 80.9     avg: 168.7     median: 177.5 (41%)     max: 239 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 59.3     avg: 70.8     median: 70.4 (20%)     max: 83.2 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 192.1     avg: 1155     median: 1251.5 (22%)     max: 1923 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 460     avg: 1423     median: 1557.5 (25%)     max: 2116 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1892     avg: 2338     median: 2408 (25%)     max: 2642 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2497     avg: 2591     median: 2583.5 (37%)     max: 2698 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 2408     avg: 2776     median: 2855 (20%)     max: 2986 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3622     avg: 3641     median: 3640.5 (23%)     max: 3660 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 3024     avg: 3466     median: 3600.5 (22%)     max: 3637 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.33
log 11. 16:47:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 07 May 2025 17:44:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3979 +0.015s ... 0.021s

#7 got single benchmarks 3979 +0.011s ... 0.033s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +0.861s ... 0.894s

#10 return log +0.001s ... 0.895s

Notebook reviews with Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ review - A high-end 2-in-1 now with the Snapdragon X Elite

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ review - A high-end 2-in-1 now with the Snapdragon X Elite

The 11th generation Surface Pro 2-in-1 has placed its bets on Qualcomm's new Snapdragon ARM processors. A 120 Hz, high-resolution, OLED touchscreen is also opti...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 13.00" | 870 g
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Qualcomm launches the new Snapdragon X Elite about nine months after the official announcement - with support from Microsoft and all the major laptop manufactur...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | 13.00" | 870 g
LG Gram 17 (2024)

LG Gram 17 (2024) laptop review - Small improvements and a new Core Ultra 7

LG's new Gram has stayed true to the series. From the outside, barely anything has changed about the slim 17-inch device. On the inside, a Meteor Lake processor...
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H | Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | 17.00" | 1.3 kg
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VF laptop review: A complete design change

MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VF laptop review: A complete design change

MSI is doubling down on the design of the 17-inch GE78 for the smaller 16-inch GE68. The new look may not be for everyone, but performance is admirable with som...
Intel Core i9-13950HX | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 16.00" | 2.7 kg
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF review: Gaming laptop with low-power RTX 4060

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF review: Gaming laptop with low-power RTX 4060

The compact Cyborg 15 is not designed for the highest performance, but mobility, a long battery life, and low power consumption play a big role. Nonetheless, th...
Intel Core i7-12650H | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 15.60" | 2 kg

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: Intel Core i7-12650H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » Microsoft Surface Pro 11 "Big Spring Deal" offers 32% savings to bring 120 Hz OLED tablet below $1,000

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: Intel Core i7-12650H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
   » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: Gaming laptop with a low power consumption and long battery life

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-04- 2)