Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB

MZVL41T0HBLB

The Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB-00BTW is a mid-range PCIe Gen4x4 M.2 SSD in the 2280 form factor. It most likely uses a Samsung controller.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity1024 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced05.09.2022

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
27.4 pt (31%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -97%
...
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-512G-1002
26.8 -2%
Micron 2450 512GB MTFDKBA512TFK
26.8 -2%
ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4
26.8 -2%
Samsung PM9C1b MZVL81T0HFLB-00BH1
26.8 -2%
Kioxia BG5 KBG5AZNV1T02
26.8 -2%
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002
26.9 -2%
SK Hynix HFM001TD3HX015N
27 -1%
ESR01TBTLCG-EAC-4
27.2 -1%
Samsung SSD 980 1TB MZ-V8V1T0BW
27.3 0%
Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB
27.4
Kioxia BG6 KBG6AZNV1T02
27.5 0%
Micron 3500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TGD
27.5 0%
WD PC SN740 256GB SDDPNQD-256G
27.5 0%
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00
27.5 0%
Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ256MGE1QDY
27.7 1%
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ
27.7 1%
Kioxia BG6 KBG60ZNS1T02
27.7 1%
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
27.7 1%
WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPNQD-512G
27.7 1%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 222%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 234.79     avg: 1146     median: 1495.6 (25%)     max: 1707.57 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 94.68     avg: 482     median: 286.5 (11%)     max: 1064.94 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 182.71     avg: 1573     median: 2167.7 (8%)     max: 2369.16 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 2242     avg: 3625     median: 3056 (19%)     max: 5577 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1015     avg: 1680     median: 1873 (26%)     max: 2151 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 812     avg: 1304     median: 820 (13%)     max: 2279 Points
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.03     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.049 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.035     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.109 ms
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 618     avg: 1312     median: 1631 (28%)     max: 1688.15 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 463     avg: 951     median: 498 (10%)     max: 1890.81 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 66.5     avg: 152.8     median: 184 (36%)     max: 207.87 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 34.6     avg: 59.3     median: 69.2 (22%)     max: 74.2 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1759     avg: 2147     median: 2127 (19%)     max: 2554.35 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 2793     avg: 2938     median: 2885 (23%)     max: 3136.99 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 114.6     avg: 175.4     median: 175.4 (16%)     max: 236.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 58.6     avg: 70.5     median: 70.5 (2%)     max: 82.48 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
2764 MB/s (15%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
2761 MB/s (31%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 395     avg: 430     median: 430 (9%)     max: 465 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 314     avg: 496     median: 496 (7%)     max: 677.9 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 3035     avg: 3044     median: 3044 (20%)     max: 3053 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 3664     avg: 3667     median: 3666.5 (20%)     max: 3669 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
655 MB/s (13%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
1145 MB/s (17%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 80.9     avg: 168.7     median: 177.5 (41%)     max: 239 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 59.3     avg: 70.8     median: 70.4 (20%)     max: 83.2 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 192.1     avg: 1155     median: 1251.5 (19%)     max: 1923 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 460     avg: 1423     median: 1557.5 (19%)     max: 2116 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1892     avg: 2338     median: 2408 (23%)     max: 2642 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2497     avg: 2591     median: 2583.5 (30%)     max: 2698 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 2408     avg: 2776     median: 2855 (20%)     max: 2986 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 3622     avg: 3641     median: 3640.5 (23%)     max: 3660 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 3024     avg: 3466     median: 3600.5 (22%)     max: 3637 MB/s
+ 4 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 01. 21:11:05

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 27 Feb 2026 01:44:18 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3979 +0.021s ... 0.027s

#7 got single benchmarks 3979 +0.012s ... 0.039s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.039s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.173s ... 3.212s

#10 return log +0.131s ... 3.343s

Notebook reviews with Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZVL41T0HBLB

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ review - A high-end 2-in-1 now with the Snapdragon X Elite

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+ review - A high-end 2-in-1 now with the Snapdragon X Elite

The 11th generation Surface Pro 2-in-1 has placed its bets on Qualcomm's new Snapdragon ARM processors. A 120 Hz, high-resolution, OLED touchscreen is also optionally available which can hit 900 nits of brightness in HDR mode.
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13", 870 g
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite Analysis - More efficient than AMD & Intel, but Apple stays ahead

Qualcomm launches the new Snapdragon X Elite about nine months after the official announcement - with support from Microsoft and all the major laptop manufacturers. We were able to test the small X1E-78-100 as well as the X1E-80-100 and compare them with current chips from AMD, Apple and Intel. Update: Benchmarks of the Snapdragon X Plus (X1P-64-100)
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13", 870 g
LG Gram 17 (2024)

LG Gram 17 (2024) laptop review - Small improvements and a new Core Ultra 7

LG's new Gram has stayed true to the series. From the outside, barely anything has changed about the slim 17-inch device. On the inside, a Meteor Lake processor now powers the laptop. However, LG has quietly and secretly eliminated a few of the points of criticism which we raised about our test device's predecessors.
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 17", 1.3 kg
MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VF laptop review: A complete design change

MSI Raider GE68 HX 13VF laptop review: A complete design change

MSI is doubling down on the design of the 17-inch GE78 for the smaller 16-inch GE68. The new look may not be for everyone, but performance is admirable with some of the fastest CPU and GPU options currently available on any gaming laptop this year.
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16", 2.7 kg
MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF review: Gaming laptop with low-power RTX 4060

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF review: Gaming laptop with low-power RTX 4060

The compact Cyborg 15 is not designed for the highest performance, but mobility, a long battery life, and low power consumption play a big role. Nonetheless, the Core i7-12650H and GeForce RTX 4060 still allow you to play all the current games smoothly on the Cyborg 15.
Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.6", 2 kg

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13.00", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+

LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G: Intel Core Ultra 7 155H Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, 17.00", 1.3 kg
  External Review » LG Gram 17 17Z90S-G.AA79G

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: Intel Core i7-12650H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
  External Review » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF

Microsoft Surface Pro OLED Copilot+: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, 13.00", 0.9 kg
   » 58% faster than a MacBook Air: Microsoft's marketing makes Surface Pro look better than it is

   » Microsoft Surface Pro 11 "Big Spring Deal" offers 32% savings to bring 120 Hz OLED tablet below $1,000

MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: Intel Core i7-12650H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 15.60", 2 kg
   » MSI Cyborg 15 A12VF: Gaming laptop with a low power consumption and long battery life

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2023-04- 2)