Notebookcheck Logo

Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA

MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA

The MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA is a 2-terabyte Micron SSD that Notebookcheck first tested in September 2025. The 2500 series drive is supposed to deliver sequential read rates of up to 7,100 MB/s, with writes approaching 6,000 MB/s.

If the PCIe 4 x4 SSD's base specs are any indication, this is your average mid-range 22 by 80 drive with 3D QLC data storage chips and no DRAM caching.

Performance

Our testing revealed fairly average AS SSD sequential read and write rates of 5.02 GB/s and 3.37 GB/s, respectively. What's probably more important is that there is no throttling under sustained loads.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity2048 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced16.04.2024
LinkMicron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
29.9 pt (34%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -98%
...
Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006
28.7 -4%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
28.7 -4%
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT512G
29 -3%
Corsair MP600
29 -3%
2x Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR (RAID 0)
29 -3%
Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN
29.2 -2%
Acer N5000
29.3 -2%
Phison Electronics PS5012
29.3 -2%
SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF
29.8 0%
Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA
29.9
Silicon Motion PCIe-8 SSD 1TB
30 0%
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU
30.1 1%
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
30.3 1%
Phison 512GB SM280512GKBB4S-E162
30.4 2%
SK Hynix PVC10 HFS001TEM4X169N
30.4 2%
Kioxia XG8 KXG8AZNV1T02
30.6 2%
WDC PC SN810 2TB
30.6 2%
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
30.6 2%
Samsung PM9A1a MZVL22T0HDLB
30.6 2%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 195%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 1408.07     avg: 2029     median: 2029.4 (34%)     max: 2650.82 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 796.19     avg: 940     median: 940 (35%)     max: 1083.84 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 2737.91     avg: 3155     median: 3154.6 (12%)     max: 3571.22 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 5302     avg: 5715     median: 5714.5 (35%)     max: 6127 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 3322     avg: 3774     median: 3773.5 (52%)     max: 4225 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1281     avg: 1318     median: 1317.5 (21%)     max: 1354 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.017     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.019 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.024     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.098 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 2753.29     avg: 3182     median: 3181.7 (54%)     max: 3610 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 703     avg: 747     median: 747.4 (15%)     max: 791.83 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 209     avg: 220.1     median: 220.1 (43%)     max: 231.16 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 60.48     avg: 63.9     median: 63.9 (20%)     max: 67.3 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 3374.84     avg: 3715     median: 3714.9 (33%)     max: 4055 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 5021.26     avg: 5063     median: 5062.6 (40%)     max: 5104 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 161.6     avg: 163.4     median: 163.4 (15%)     max: 165.1 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 64.6     avg: 66.2     median: 66.2 (2%)     max: 67.76 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
2905 MB/s (16%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
3148 MB/s (36%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 536     avg: 2658     median: 2658.2 (56%)     max: 4780.3 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 501     avg: 3666     median: 3666.3 (54%)     max: 6831.5 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 539.4     avg: 3337     median: 3337.2 (22%)     max: 6135 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 528.3     avg: 3757     median: 3756.7 (20%)     max: 6985 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8
min: 510.8     avg: 523     median: 522.9 (10%)     max: 535 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8
min: 780     avg: 834     median: 833.9 (12%)     max: 887.7 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 87.3     avg: 132.5     median: 132.5 (30%)     max: 177.6 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 49.5     avg: 59.1     median: 59.1 (17%)     max: 68.7 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 397     avg: 446.5     median: 446.5 (7%)     max: 496 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 637     avg: 756     median: 756 (9%)     max: 875 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 3481     avg: 3527     median: 3527 (34%)     max: 3573 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 2980     avg: 3132     median: 3131.5 (37%)     max: 3283 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 5925     avg: 6042     median: 6041.5 (41%)     max: 6158 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 6933     avg: 6954     median: 6953.5 (43%)     max: 6974 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 6911     avg: 6936     median: 6935.5 (43%)     max: 6960 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0100200300400500600700800900100011001200130014001500160017001800190020002100220023002400250026002700280029003000310032003300340035003600370038003900400041004200430044004500460047004800490050005100520053005400550056005700580059006000610062006300640065006600670068006900Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 06. 16:42:24

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 04 Mar 2026 01:57:14 +0100 +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.008s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4311 +0.021s ... 0.029s

#7 got single benchmarks 4311 +0.007s ... 0.036s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.036s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +3.692s ... 3.728s

#10 return log +0.333s ... 4.061s

Notebook reviews with Micron 2500 2TB MTFDKBA2T0QGN-1BN1AABGA

Asus ProArt P16 5090 review - Tandem OLED and RTX 5090 up against the Apple MacBook Pro 16

Asus ProArt P16 5090 review - Tandem OLED and RTX 5090 up against the Apple MacBook Pro 16

Asus is on the upgrade march, and its ProArt P16 is now available with an extremely bright tandem OLED panel and the mobile GeForce RTX 5090 with 24 GB of VRAM. Is this the perfect multimedia laptop and long-awaited Windows alternative to Apple's MacBook Pro 16 with the M4 Max?
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16", 2 kg

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW: Intel Core Ultra 9 285H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
  External Review » Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CW

Asus ProArt P16 RTX 5090: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 16.00", 2 kg
   » Asus vs. Lenovo: Who has the best tandem OLED display?

   » The new Asus ProArt P16 with the Tandem OLED is the best multimedia laptop you can buy right now

   » Asus ProArt P16 Preview - Now with RTX 5090 Laptop and Lumina Pro OLED

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2025-09- 7)