Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
 
 
 
 

WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

The Western Digital PC SN730 NVMe SSD 512 GB is a fast M.2 2280 PCIe SSD for laptops and desktops. It is specified at 3400 MB/s reading and 2700 MB/s writing and 450k 4K IOPS reading and 400k 4K IOS writing. The MTBF are 1.75 million hours and WD offers a 5 years warranty to consumers.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2
Capacity512 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced14.04.2020

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
39.8 pt (47%)
64 GB eMMC Flash -92%
...
SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X081N -5%
Micron 2300 1TB MTFDHBA1T0TDV -4%
SK Hynix HFS512 GDE9X081N -3%
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 -3%
SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) -2%
HP EX900 Pro 1 TB -2%
Phison PS5013 PRO-X-1TB-G2R NVMe SSD -1%
BIWIN NS200 1TB CNF82GS1G02-1TB -1%
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N -1%
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB
ADATA XPG Gammix S50 Lite 512GB 1%
Lite-On CA5-8D512 1%
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ 1%
ESR512GTLCG-EAC-4 1%
SK Hynix PC711 512GB HFS512GDE9X073N 2%
Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW010T8 3%
Phison PM81000GPMQCN28BTF-E12S4 M.2 NVM SSD 3%
Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G 3%
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G 4%
...
Western Digital WD_BLACK SN850 WDS100T1X0E 112%
0%
100%
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 878.94     avg: 1074     median: 1018.1 (17%)     max: 1326.29 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 475.64     avg: 534     median: 494.8 (18%)     max: 630.31 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1597.33     avg: 1903     median: 2037 (55%)     max: 2073.51 MB/s
+ 3 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 3083     avg: 3781     median: 3859 (42%)     max: 4568 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 1283     avg: 1772     median: 1758.5 (40%)     max: 2217 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 1108     avg: 1354     median: 1258.5 (35%)     max: 1708 Points
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.027     avg: 0     median: 0 (0%)     max: 0.07 ms
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.055     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.142 ms
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 989.83     avg: 1479     median: 1449.9 (38%)     max: 1933.32 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 771.57     avg: 1061     median: 961 (32%)     max: 1415.53 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 88.83     avg: 127     median: 133.1 (1%)     max: 154.92 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 38.64     avg: 42.2     median: 42 (16%)     max: 46.57 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 1079.21     avg: 1655     median: 1418 (29%)     max: 2495.21 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 1938.8     avg: 2506     median: 2599.3 (45%)     max: 2901 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Write
298 MB/s (39%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K QD32 Read
552 MB/s (58%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Write
187 MB/s (21%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 4K Read
44.9 MB/s (1%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Write
1025 MB/s (24%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - 512K Read
673 MB/s (28%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Write
2153 MB/s (51%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 - Sequential Read
2527 MB/s (72%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 76.7     avg: 141     median: 141.8 (13%)     max: 196.3 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 32.04     avg: 45.6     median: 47.4 (1%)     max: 54.19 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1019     avg: 2066     median: 2194 (12%)     max: 2644 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 1708     avg: 2014     median: 2014 (37%)     max: 2508 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 415.6     avg: 472     median: 423.8 (25%)     max: 637.1 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 367.1     avg: 453     median: 414.8 (26%)     max: 547.3 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 1337     avg: 2433     median: 2705 (48%)     max: 2713 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 2850     avg: 3237     median: 3319 (37%)     max: 3405 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 106.74     avg: 143     median: 140.5 (43%)     max: 193.86 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 39.88     avg: 46.8     median: 47.1 (17%)     max: 53.67 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 488     avg: 942     median: 883.5 (21%)     max: 1573 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 887.22     avg: 1246     median: 1148 (27%)     max: 1728 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1237.11     avg: 2174     median: 2283.5 (46%)     max: 2666.23 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 1119.46     avg: 1940     median: 2140.5 (46%)     max: 2426.79 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 1230.66     avg: 2452     median: 2703.7 (45%)     max: 2715 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 1842.23     avg: 3065     median: 3402.3 (48%)     max: 3437 MB/s
+ 6 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 2688.54     avg: 3070     median: 3137 (46%)     max: 3422 MB/s
+ 5 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
010020030040050060070080090010001100120013001400150016001700180019002000210022002300240025002600270028002900300031003200330034001703.521717.991719.451721.551722.61723.021723.561723.771724.911725.121726.382675.342902.882903.572909.172917.182925.762925.972929.32929.722937.92938.942945.012946.292955.92959.042960.082961.392966.782970.832973.692978.712979.762983.942987.182988.232988.962989.82990.332990.542991.272995.662996.832998.83006.483009.833010.733011.783020.573040.871906.982340.212431.692875.492875.72876.122876.752876.962876.962877.392877.812877.812878.022878.022878.022878.022878.232878.232878.232878.232878.232878.232878.442878.442878.442878.652878.652878.652878.652878.652878.862878.862878.862878.862878.862878.862879.072879.072879.072879.072879.072879.282879.282879.282879.492879.72879.912879.912880.122880.121911.511912.971913.811913.861914.231914.281915.061937.042019.292979.973063.683194.083252.053315.053430.5834313431.423431.843432.053432.883433.723434.353434.723434.773435.133435.193435.343435.393435.393435.393435.63435.763435.813435.973436.183436.183436.233436.393436.813436.863437.023437.073437.233437.443437.653437.73437.863437.913438.073438.287241678.772242.192343.282594.863184.243410.493414.053415.33415.723417.193418.023418.023418.233418.863419.073419.073419.283419.493419.493419.493419.73419.73419.73419.913419.913419.913419.913419.913419.913419.913419.913420.123420.123420.123420.123420.333420.333420.333420.533420.533420.533420.533420.743420.743420.743420.953420.953421.373421.713042.553424.443426.543426.963427.173427.593427.593428.423428.423428.423428.423428.423428.423428.423428.633428.843428.843428.843428.843429.053429.053429.053429.053429.263429.263429.263429.263429.263429.473429.683429.683429.683429.683429.893429.953430.13430.733430.943430.943430.943430.943431.213431.363431.423431.423431.633431.633431.783431.843432.88Tooltip
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.17
log 22. 07:44:46

#0 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#1 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#2 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 17 Oct 2021 22:43:07 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#3 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#4 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#5 getting avg benchmarks for device 3463 +0.006s ... 0.009s

#6 got single benchmarks 3463 +0.014s ... 0.024s

#7 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#8 min, max, avg, median took s +0.559s ... 0.583s

#9 return log +0.01s ... 0.593s

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Notebook reviews with WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 15.60", 2.5 kg
  Review » Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53 in review: Fast gaming machine with extra performance

Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G2 AMD: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 2 AMD laptop review: Upgradeability meets AMD Ryzen 5000

Lenovo ThinkPad L14-20U50003GE: AMD Ryzen 5 4500U AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), 14.00", 1.7 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Review: AMD Does It Again

Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 15.60", 2.2 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad T15p Gen 1 laptop review: Powerful but inefficient

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS: Intel Core i7-10510U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 14.00", 1.3 kg
  Review » Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 4th Gen Core i7 Convertible Review: A ThinkPad X1 Carbon in Disguise

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 15.60", 1.3 kg
  Review » Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver Laptop Review: Great 15-inch Ultrabook with driver issues

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 15.60", 2.5 kg
   » Memory in the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53 runs in single-channel mode

Lenovo ThinkPad L14 G2 AMD: AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 5000), 14.00", 1.7 kg
   » The Lenovo ThinkPad L14 Gen 2 is one of the most upgradeable 2021 ThinkPads

Lenovo ThinkPad T15p-20TN0006GE: Intel Core i7-10750H NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 15.60", 2.2 kg
   » The Lenovo ThinkPad T15p surprises us with a plastic case

Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 20SA000GUS: Intel Core i7-10510U Intel UHD Graphics 620, 14.00", 1.3 kg
   » PSA: Check your Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga for light bleed and dead pixels

Samsung Galaxy Book Ion Aura Silver: Intel Core i7-10510U NVIDIA GeForce MX250, 15.60", 1.3 kg
   » The 15-inch Ultrabook Samsung Galaxy Book Ion is great - but it still has some issues.

Please share our article, every link counts!