Notebookcheck Logo

Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13

The Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 NVMe PCIe x4 3.0 is an M.2 2280 mid-range SSD.

TypeSSD
SizeM.2 2280
Capacity500 GB
InterfaceNVMe
Announced20.06.2021

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - DiskSpd
18.7 pt (21%)
Seagate ST1000LM014 Solid State Hybrid Drive
0.687 -96%
...
Samsung BM9C1 1024GB
18 -4%
Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV
18.1 -3%
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
18.3 -2%
Samsung SSD 990 EVO 2TB
18.3 -2%
Adata Legend 710
18.3 -2%
Foresee VP1000F512G
18.4 -2%
SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB
18.4 -2%
ASint AS806
18.6 -1%
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18.6 -1%
Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13
18.7
Lenovo UMIS RPJTJ256MEE1OWX
18.8 1%
SK Hynix PC611 512GB
18.9 1%
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G
18.9 1%
Mushkin Helix-L 1TB MKNSSDHL1TB-08
19 2%
SK Hynix BC711 HFM256GD3GX013N
19.1 2%
SSSTC CL4-8D512
19.1 2%
Lexar NM610 500GB
19.1 2%
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-256G
19.2 3%
Intel SSDPEKNW512GZL
19.2 3%
...
Kingston Fury Renegade G5 8TB
88.2 372%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
AS SSD - Copy Game
min: 319.2     avg: 954     median: 953.6 (16%)     max: 1588 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy Program
min: 188.1     avg: 544     median: 544.1 (20%)     max: 900 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Copy ISO
min: 1218     avg: 1257     median: 1257 (5%)     max: 1296 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Total
min: 1497     avg: 1946     median: 1946 (12%)     max: 2395 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Write
min: 534     avg: 751     median: 751 (10%)     max: 968 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Score Read
min: 663     avg: 809     median: 808.5 (13%)     max: 954 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Write *
min: 0.092     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.175 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Access Time Read *
min: 0.052     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (0%)     max: 0.1 ms
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Write
min: 313     avg: 478     median: 478 (8%)     max: 643 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K-64 Read
min: 432.5     avg: 572     median: 572.3 (11%)     max: 712 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Write
min: 126.1     avg: 137     median: 137 (27%)     max: 147.9 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - 4K Read
min: 28.88     avg: 32.8     median: 32.8 (10%)     max: 36.65 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Write
min: 947     avg: 1362     median: 1361.5 (12%)     max: 1776 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
AS SSD - Sequential Read
min: 1937     avg: 2036     median: 2036 (16%)     max: 2135 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K
min: 108.5     avg: 168.4     median: 168.4 (15%)     max: 228.3 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K
min: 44.51     avg: 52.6     median: 52.6 (1%)     max: 60.7 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Write Seq
min: 1212     avg: 1554     median: 1553.5 (8%)     max: 1895 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5 Read Seq
min: 1485     avg: 1529     median: 1529 (17%)     max: 1573 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1
min: 263     avg: 369.8     median: 369.8 (8%)     max: 476.6 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1
min: 310.1     avg: 451.1     median: 451.1 (7%)     max: 592 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1
min: 1757     avg: 1947     median: 1946.5 (13%)     max: 2136 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 - CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1
min: 2413     avg: 2435     median: 2435 (13%)     max: 2457 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write
min: 114     avg: 146.5     median: 146.5 (34%)     max: 179 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read
min: 35.7     avg: 39.4     median: 39.4 (11%)     max: 43 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write
min: 279     avg: 1072     median: 1072 (16%)     max: 1865 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read
min: 649     avg: 1124     median: 1123.5 (14%)     max: 1598 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_write
min: 1358     avg: 1543     median: 1542.5 (15%)     max: 1727 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_read
min: 1462     avg: 1476     median: 1476 (17%)     max: 1490 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write
min: 1768     avg: 1858     median: 1858 (13%)     max: 1948 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd seq_q8t1_read
min: 2445     avg: 2470     median: 2470 (15%)     max: 2495 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
DiskSpd - DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read
min: 2338     avg: 2374     median: 2374 (15%)     max: 2410 MB/s
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values
red legend - Average benchmark values
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

search for model:
v1.35
log 28. 04:02:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 27 Feb 2026 01:44:18 +0100 +0.002s ... 0.002s

#4 composed specs +0.001s ... 0.003s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 3673 +0.044s ... 0.047s

#7 got single benchmarks 3673 +0.008s ... 0.055s

#8 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.055s

#9 min, max, avg, median took s +4.736s ... 4.791s

#10 return log +0.131s ... 4.922s

Notebook reviews with Phison C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13

Dynabook Tecra A40 in review: A whisper in the office...

Dynabook Tecra A40 in review: A whisper in the office...

The extremely quiet laptop shows how much performance can be found in an 11th generation Intel i5 processor when it is installed accordingly. The laptop can score with its high battery life for a mid-range B2B device. Unfortunately, it falls short of expectations in other areas.
Intel Core i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 14", 1.4 kg
Infinix INBook X1 Pro Laptop Review: Surprisingly Solid All Around

Infinix INBook X1 Pro Laptop Review: Surprisingly Solid All Around

After dabbling in budget Android smartphones for years, Infinix is now ready for its leap of faith into the laptop world. Its debut INBook X1 Pro retails for only $700 USD or less and it's already looking like a much stronger contender than initially anticipated.
Intel Core i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 14", 1.5 kg

Dynabook Tecra A40-J-12E: Intel Core i5-1135G7 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, 14.00", 1.4 kg
  External Review » Dynabook Tecra A40-J-12E

Infinix INBook X1 Pro: Intel Core i7-1065G7 Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 14.00", 1.5 kg
  External Review » Infinix INBook X1 Pro

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2021-06-20)