Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53 in review: Fast gaming machine with extra performance

More power at the press of a button. The Predator Helios 300 brings all modern computer games smoothly onto the matte screen (Full HD, IPS, 144 Hz). Since Acer only uses one RAM module, memory runs in single-channel mode.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (translated by Stephanie Chamberlain), 11/03/2020 🇩🇪 🇮🇹 ...

The Predator Helios is a 15.6-inch gaming laptop. The device is powered by a Core i7-10750H processor and a GeForce RTX 2060 GPU. Competitors include devices like the Dell G5 15 SE, the Aorus 5 KB, the Schenker XMG Core 15, and the Asus TUF A15 FA506IV.

Since the Predator is largely identical in construction to its predecessor, we won't go any further into the case, the connectivity, the input devices, the display, and the speakers - unless there are differences. The corresponding information can be found in the review of the Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52.

Test device courtesy of Acer Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
82.9 %	11/2020	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.5 kg	22.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.7 %	06/2020	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M	2.4 kg	21.6 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.7 %	10/2020	Aorus 5 KB i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.1 kg	28 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.1 %	09/2020	Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.7 %	06/2020	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

Case and connectivity - Slight changes compared to the predecessor

At first glance, the case resembles that of its predecessor. But there are differences. For example, the power supply connector has been moved from the center of the left side to the center of the back. The HDMI output and the Mini DisplayPort have switched places. Furthermore, additional ventilation openings have been created above the keyboard. Moreover, the current model has gained some weight. There's a new addition in terms of ports too: Instead of a USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 1 port, the current Predator model has a USB Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 port on board.

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones

Size comparison

Aorus 5 KB Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O ❌

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1403 (1367^min - 1497^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1385 (1268^min - 1486^max) MBit/s ∼99% -1%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1380 MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (758 - 1514, n=9)	1275 MBit/s ∼91% -9%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1230 MBit/s ∼88% -12%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1190 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming (496 - 1645, n=160, last 2 years)	1154 MBit/s ∼82% -18%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	662 (553^min - 769^max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	662 (635^min - 674^max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	653 (615^min - 670^max) MBit/s ∼47% -53%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1640 MBit/s ∼100% +15%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)	1470 (1297^min - 1511^max) MBit/s ∼90% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)	1425 (1394^min - 1454^max) MBit/s ∼87%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1380 MBit/s ∼84% -3%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW) (887 - 1670, n=9)	1356 MBit/s ∼83% -5%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1340 MBit/s ∼82% -6%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=160, last 2 years)	1217 MBit/s ∼74% -15%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW)	672 (658^min - 682^max) MBit/s ∼41% -53%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	637 (626^min - 648^max) MBit/s ∼39% -55%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC	630 (571^min - 641^max) MBit/s ∼38% -56%

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1424 (1394-1454)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW); iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø672 (658-682)

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1469 (1297-1511)

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø636 (626-648)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø629 (571-641)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW); iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1403 (1367-1497)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Killer Wireless-AC 1550i Wireless Network Adapter (9560NGW); iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø653 (615-670)

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW); iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1385 (1268-1486)

HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø662 (635-674)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Realtek 8822CE Wireless LAN 802.11ac PCI-E NIC; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø661 (553-769)

ColorChecker Aorus 5 KB: 22.26 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 35.1 ∆E

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Asus-TUF-A15-with-AMD-Renoir-and-Nvidia-Graphics-in-Review.469570.0.html">Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172</a> — Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Going-all-in-on-AMD-Dell-G5-15-Special-Edition-Radeon-RX-5600M-Laptop-Review.477090.0.html">Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F</a> — Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Aorus-5-KB-laptop-in-review-Gigabyte-builds-upon-Clevo-barebone-with-the-RTX-2060.497455.0.html">Aorus 5 KB</a> — Aorus 5 KB

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Schenker-XMG-Core-15-Tongfang-GK5NR0O-Laptop-Review-AMD-gamer-with-a-good-price-performance-ratio.495798.0.html">Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O</a> — Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O

<a href="https://www.notebookcheck.net/Acer-Predator-Helios-300-PH315-53-in-review-Fast-gaming-machine-with-extra-performance.501561.0.html">Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5</a> — Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5

Display - 144 Hz IPS

While the contrast (1,450:1) of the matte, viewing-angle stable 15.6-inch display (Full HD, IPS) is good, the brightness (294.3 cd/m²) is just about acceptable. We consider values beyond 300 cd/m² to be good. The 144 Hz panel used offers fast response times and decent color reproduction. Positive: We couldn't detect any PWM flickering.

This is the same panel that was used in the previous model. Nevertheless, the values measured differ slightly. This is a normal condition. Two identical displays will never be 100% consistent.


283 cd/m²	312 cd/m²	265 cd/m²
298 cd/m²	319 cd/m²	289 cd/m²
283 cd/m²	313 cd/m²	287 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AU Optronics B156HAN08.2

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 319 cd/m² Average: 294.3 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 254 cd/m²
Contrast: 1450:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.42 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5
ΔE Greyscale 4.84 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
92.31% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.15% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 AU Optronics B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY AUO, B156HAN08.2, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.60	Aorus 5 KB LG Philips LP156WFG-SPB2 (LGD05E8), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O LM156LF-1F02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Display		-1%	-3%	-1%	3%	-39%
Display P3 Coverage	65.15	64.07 -2%	62.99 -3%	63.4 -3%	67.22 3%	38.92 -40%
sRGB Coverage	92.31	93.04 1%	90.07 -2%	92.85 1%	95.91 4%	58.47 -37%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.32	65.66 -1%	64.12 -3%	64.77 -2%	68.53 3%	40.22 -39%
Response Times		15%	-9%	7%	29%	-109%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17 ?(9, 8)	15 ?(8, 7) 12%	20.4 ?(10.8, 9.6) -20%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 15%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 44%	34 ?(16, 18) -100%
Response Time Black / White *	11 ?(6, 5)	9 ?(5, 4) 18%	10.8 ?(6.4, 4.4) 2%	11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4) -2%	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2) 13%	24 ?(13, 11) -118%
PWM Frequency			198.4 ?(99)
Screen		-2%	0%	10%	-13%	-17%
Brightness middle	319	325 2%	292 -8%	318 0%	312 -2%	280 -12%
Brightness	294	310 5%	290 -1%	298 1%	290 -1%	254 -14%
Brightness Distribution	83	82 -1%	77 -7%	87 5%	87 5%	88 6%
Black Level *	0.22	0.255 -16%	0.27 -23%	0.3 -36%	0.2 9%	0.15 32%
Contrast	1450	1275 -12%	1081 -25%	1060 -27%	1560 8%	1867 29%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *	4.42	4.28 3%	3.99 10%	2.49 44%	4.84 -10%	5.89 -33%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *	8.54	8.42 1%	6.11 28%	5.06 41%	13.85 -62%	19 -122%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *	4.84	5.01 -4%	3.3 32%	1.6 67%	9 -86%	4.08 16%
Gamma	2.39 ^92%	2.6 ^85%	2.25 ^98%	2.211 ^100%	2.105 ^105%	2.33 ^94%
CCT	6850 ^95%	7678 ^85%	7047 ^92%	6714 ^97%	8099 ^80%	7303 ^89%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	60 0%	58.1 -3%	65 8%	68 13%	37 -38%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	92	93 1%	89.7 -2%	89 -3%	92 0%	58 -37%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *		1.45	3.02	1.53	1.77	4.79
Total Average (Program / Settings)		4% / 0%	-4% / -2%	5% / 7%	6% / -4%	-55% / -34%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.8 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17031 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Performance - Predator with automatic GPU overclocking

With the Predator Helios 300, Acer has a 15.6-inch gaming laptop in its range that brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen. The price of our test device should be approximately between 1,500 and 1,600 Euros (~$1,744 and ~$1,860). Other configuration variants are available. The prices start at around 1,020 Euros (~$1,186).

Test conditions

The preinstalled Predator Sense software allows fan control adjustment and automatic GPU overclocking. The GPU profiles "Normal", "Fast" and "Extreme" are available. We conducted our test with automatic fan control and under the "Normal" GPU profile. Some benchmarks were additionally run under the "Extreme" profile.

Acer has placed a "Turbo" key above the keyboard. If this button is pressed, the fans run permanently at full power, and the "Extreme" GPU profile is activated.

Processor

The Core i7-10750H hexa-core processor (Comet Lake) operates at a base speed of 2.6 GHz. The clock speed can be increased to 4.3 GHz (six cores) or 5 GHz (one core) via Turbo. Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor works through the CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark at 4.2 GHz (multithread) and 4.2 to 5 GHz (single-thread), respectively. On battery power, the clock rates are 2.4 to 2.6 GHz (multithread) and 2.4 to 3.2 GHz (single-thread), respectively.

We verify if the CPU Turbo is consistently used when plugged in by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test in a continuous loop for at least 30 minutes. Turbo is used to a large extent.

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1262 (1250.2-1356.16)

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1113 (1102.29-1169.32)

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1845 (1564.03-1971.71)

Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1145 (1045.12-1193.85)

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1866 (1840.26-1926.13)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H: Ø1753 (1601.6-1850.14)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

194 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1356 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

133.68 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	203 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Gaming (108 - 254, n=196, last 2 years)	203 Points ∼100% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (184 - 213, n=45)	197 Points ∼97% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	194 Points ∼96%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	190 Points ∼94% -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	188 Points ∼93% -3%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	187 Points ∼92% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	187 Points ∼92% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	186 Points ∼92% -4%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	186 Points ∼92% -4%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1972 (1142.92^min - 1972^max) Points ∼100% +45%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1926 Points ∼98% +42%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1884 Points ∼96% +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1850 Points ∼94% +36%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1741 (1664.03^min - 1741.33^max) Points ∼88% +28%
Average of class Gaming (536 - 2804, n=207, last 2 years)	1599 Points ∼81% +18%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	1356 Points ∼69%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (804 - 1418, n=50)	1263 Points ∼64% -7%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	1194 (1045.12^min - 1193.85^max) Points ∼61% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	1170 Points ∼59% -14%

Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	476.1 Seconds * ∼100% -38%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (322 - 587, n=43)	389 Seconds * ∼82% -13%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	388 Seconds * ∼81% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	345 Seconds * ∼72%
Average of class Gaming (179 - 555, n=172, last 2 years)	314 Seconds * ∼66% +9%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	284 Seconds * ∼60% +18%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	276 Seconds * ∼58% +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	262.5 Seconds * ∼55% +24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	257.8 Seconds * ∼54% +25%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	255 Seconds * ∼54% +26%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	5253 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Average of class Gaming (2945 - 6174, n=173, last 2 years)	5242 MIPS ∼100% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	5190 MIPS ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4504 - 5470, n=43)	5114 MIPS ∼97% -1%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4725 MIPS ∼90% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	4719 MIPS ∼90% -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4666 MIPS ∼89% -10%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4666 MIPS ∼89% -10%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4664 MIPS ∼89% -10%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4584 MIPS ∼87% -12%
7z b 4
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	52152 MIPS ∼100% +45%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	49685 MIPS ∼95% +38%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	48326 MIPS ∼93% +34%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	47520 MIPS ∼91% +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	45679 MIPS ∼88% +27%
Average of class Gaming (15146 - 75612, n=173, last 2 years)	44903 MIPS ∼86% +25%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	35954 MIPS ∼69%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	35797 MIPS ∼69% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (26040 - 37345, n=43)	33946 MIPS ∼65% -6%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	28512 MIPS ∼55% -21%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (312 - 634, n=189, last 2 years)	499 Points ∼100% +4%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	491 Points ∼98% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	485 Points ∼97% +1%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	482 Points ∼97% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	482 Points ∼97%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	477 Points ∼96% -1%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	476 Points ∼95% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	475 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (431 - 504, n=43)	473 Points ∼95% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	459 Points ∼92% -5%
CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4435 Points ∼100% +43%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4396 Points ∼99% +42%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4369 Points ∼99% +41%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	4257 Points ∼96% +37%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	3956 Points ∼89% +28%
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 6321, n=190, last 2 years)	3756 Points ∼85% +21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	3098 Points ∼70%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	3075 Points ∼69% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1749 - 3325, n=43)	2848 Points ∼64% -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	2599 Points ∼59% -16%

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	1316 Points ∼100% +5%
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1777, n=171, last 2 years)	1308 Points ∼99% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (1114 - 1333, n=43)	1263 Points ∼96% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	1248 Points ∼95%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1196 Points ∼91% -4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1188 Points ∼90% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1166 Points ∼89% -7%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1158 Points ∼88% -7%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	1154 Points ∼88% -8%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7984 Points ∼100% +39%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7775 Points ∼97% +35%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	7453 Points ∼93% +30%
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 11393, n=171, last 2 years)	7176 Points ∼90% +25%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	6906 Points ∼86% +20%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	6397 Points ∼80% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (4443 - 6674, n=43)	6135 Points ∼77% +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5920 Points ∼74% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	5752 Points ∼72%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	13.3 fps ∼100% +28%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.6 fps ∼95% +21%
Average of class Gaming (6.13 - 19.8, n=172, last 2 years)	12.4 fps ∼93% +19%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	12.1 fps ∼91% +16%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	11.7 fps ∼88% +13%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	10.8 fps ∼81% +4%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps ∼78%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (5.54 - 11.6, n=43)	9.61 fps ∼72% -8%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	9.5 fps ∼71% -9%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H	7.63 fps ∼57% -27%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	93.9 s * ∼100% -69%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	69.1 s * ∼74% -24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	67.98 s * ∼72% -22%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	60.16 s * ∼64% -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	55.72 s * ∼59%
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=165, last 2 years)	54.6 s * ∼58% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (43.1 - 99.2, n=43)	53.3 s * ∼57% +4%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	49 s * ∼52% +12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	28.6 s * ∼30% +49%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average Intel Core i7-10750H (0.578 - 0.708, n=42)	0.611 sec * ∼100% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.603 sec * ∼99% -0%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H	0.602 sec * ∼99% -0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.602 sec * ∼99%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.597 sec * ∼98% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.583 sec * ∼95% +3%
Average of class Gaming (0.4907 - 1.088, n=167, last 2 years)	0.581 sec * ∼95% +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.569 sec * ∼93% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	0.569 sec * ∼93% +5%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The system is fast and smooth. The PCMark results are good. The laptop offers enough computing power for performance-demanding applications such as gaming, video-editing, and image-processing for the coming years. A slight increase in performance could be achieved by activating dual-channel mode. For this purpose, the laptop would have to be equipped with a second memory module.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4160 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5899 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5405 points
PCMark 10 Score		5921 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (3952 - 7884, n=175, last 2 years)	6131 Points ∼100% +4%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	5936 Points ∼97% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	5921 Points ∼97%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5639 Points ∼92% -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5602 Points ∼91% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4984 - 6268, n=9)	5455 Points ∼89% -8%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	5452 Points ∼89% -8%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5427 Points ∼89% -8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5279 Points ∼86% -11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5095 Points ∼83% -14%
Essentials
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9833 Points ∼100% +6%
Average of class Gaming (7148 - 11266, n=174, last 2 years)	9656 Points ∼98% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (9029 - 10047, n=9)	9536 Points ∼97% +3%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	9461 Points ∼96% +2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	9297 Points ∼95% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	9266 Points ∼94%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	9029 Points ∼92% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8806 Points ∼90% -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	8773 Points ∼89% -5%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	8621 Points ∼88% -7%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (5813 - 10066, n=174, last 2 years)	8286 Points ∼100% 0%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	8261 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (7562 - 8261, n=9)	8000 Points ∼97% -3%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	7562 Points ∼91% -8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	7319 Points ∼88% -11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	7312 Points ∼88% -11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7260 Points ∼88% -12%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7156 Points ∼86% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	7122 Points ∼86% -14%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6893 Points ∼83% -17%
Digital Content Creation
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	8197 Points ∼100% +11%
Average of class Gaming (3670 - 12250, n=174, last 2 years)	7939 Points ∼97% +8%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	7491 Points ∼91% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	7362 Points ∼90%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7178 Points ∼88% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6554 Points ∼80% -11%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	6443 Points ∼79% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	6335 Points ∼77% -14%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (4567 - 8094, n=9)	5879 Points ∼72% -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5695 Points ∼69% -23%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5197 Points ∼100% +25%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	4894 Points ∼94% +18%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	4805 Points ∼92% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	4698 Points ∼90% +13%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	4688 Points ∼90% +13%
Average of class Gaming (2832 - 6277, n=85, last 2 years)	4583 Points ∼88% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (3836 - 4539, n=6)	4254 Points ∼82% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	4160 Points ∼80%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5983 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	5773 Points ∼96% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5405 - 5928, n=6)	5726 Points ∼96% +6%
Average of class Gaming (4265 - 7104, n=85, last 2 years)	5697 Points ∼95% +5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	5580 Points ∼93% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, i7-9750H, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	5483 Points ∼92% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	5405 Points ∼90%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	5352 Points ∼89% -1%

DPC latencies

In our standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, high-load Prime95), we could observe issues with the DPC latencies. The system doesn't seem to be suitable for real-time video and audio-editing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	2216 μs * ∼100% -134%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1781 μs * ∼80% -88%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Radeon RX 5300M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1422.9 μs * ∼64% -50%
Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	1218.2 μs * ∼55% -28%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	948.2 μs * ∼43%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	797.4 μs * ∼36% +16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, R7 4800H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8	789.9 μs * ∼36% +17%

* ... smaller is better

Storage

The laptop can accommodate two NVMe SSDs in the M.2 2280 format, which could form a RAID 0 array if required. Our test device is only equipped with one NVMe SSD that provides 512 GB of storage space. The transfer rates are good. Furthermore, the Predator still has room for a 2.5-inch storage medium. Our test device can't be upgraded with that type of drive, because the necessary SATA slot is not included.

The SATA slot needed for the installation of a 2.5-inch storage drive is missing.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3213 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2705 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 524.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 416.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1718 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2644 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.24 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 137.5 MB/s

	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB	Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G	Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU	Aorus 5 KB ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT)	Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Average WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-7%	-17%	11%	29%	-13%	-2%
Write 4K	137.5	108.7 -21%	142.1 3%	162.1 18%	233 69%	219.8 60%	141 ?(76.7 - 196, n=5) 3%
Read 4K	48.24	44.91 -7%	46.43 -4%	60.66 26%	54.5 13%	50.16 4%	45.6 ?(32 - 54.2, n=5) -5%
Write Seq	2644	2424 -8%	1108 -58%	2366 -11%	3050 15%	978.7 -63%	2066 ?(1019 - 2644, n=5) -22%
Read Seq	1718	1617 -6%	1622 -6%	2633 53%	3042 77%	1990 16%	2014 ?(1708 - 2508, n=5) 17%
Write 4K Q32T1	416.6	356.9 -14%	467 12%	428.2 3%	519.5 25%	515.8 24%	472 ?(416 - 637, n=5) 13%
Read 4K Q32T1	524.9	556.8 6%	524.5 0%	582.2 11%	546.1 4%	298.3 -43%	453 ?(367 - 547, n=5) -14%
Write Seq Q32T1	2705	2541.8 -6%	1203 -56%	2480 -8%	3241 20%	981.7 -64%	2433 ?(1337 - 2713, n=5) -10%
Read Seq Q32T1	3213	3217.7 0%	2288 -29%	3121 -3%	3538 10%	1907.2 -41%	3237 ?(2850 - 3405, n=5) 1%
Write 4K Q8T8		1137.5				980.5
Read 4K Q8T8		1346.2				300.9
AS SSD		4%	-29%	0%	32%	-23%	3%
Seq Read	2752.79	2841 3%	1386.48 -50%	2794.95 2%	2836 3%	1682 -39%	2506 ?(1939 - 2901, n=6) -9%
Seq Write	2495.21	2009 -19%	1233.57 -51%	2171.68 -13%	2452 -2%	904 -64%	1655 ?(1079 - 2495, n=6) -34%
4K Read	38.64	39.34 2%	41.32 7%	53.33 38%	60.37 56%	60.21 56%	42.2 ?(38.6 - 46.6, n=6) 9%
4K Write	88.83	102.75 16%	127.96 44%	121.32 37%	190.52 114%	164.78 86%	127 ?(88.8 - 155, n=6) 43%
4K-64 Read	952.18	1257.34 32%	853.7 -10%	713.6 -25%	1282.5 35%	472.49 -50%	1061 ?(772 - 1416, n=6) 11%
4K-64 Write	1567.51	1521.71 -3%	721.31 -54%	1375.73 -12%	2297.92 47%	845.47 -46%	1479 ?(990 - 1933, n=6) -6%
Access Time Read *		0.086	0.098	0.049	0.034	0.087	0.1012 ?(0.055 - 0.142, n=5)
Access Time Write *	0.044	0.036 18%	0.095 -116%	0.036 18%	0.02 55%	0.02 55%	0.0383 ?(0.027 - 0.07, n=6) 13%
Score Read	1266	1581 25%	1034 -18%	1046 -17%	1627 29%	701 -45%	1354 ?(1108 - 1708, n=6) 7%
Score Write	1906	1825 -4%	973 -49%	1714 -10%	2734 43%	1101 -42%	1772 ?(1283 - 2217, n=6) -7%
Score Total	3811	4175 10%	2536 -33%	3279 -14%	5184 36%	2143 -44%	3781 ?(3083 - 4568, n=6) -1%
Copy ISO MB/s	2036.98	1445.76 -29%	1284.05 -37%		2039.34 0%	674.64 -67%	1903 ?(1597 - 2074, n=3) -7%
Copy Program MB/s	475.64	473.37 0%	401.88 -16%		437.99 -8%	248.35 -48%	534 ?(476 - 630, n=3) 12%
Copy Game MB/s	1018.05	970.58 -5%	1013.21 0%		1137.44 12%	534.73 -47%	1074 ?(879 - 1326, n=3) 5%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2% / -0%	-23% / -25%	6% / 5%	31% / 31%	-18% / -19%	1% / 1%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-512GB: Ø2689 (1703.52-3040.87)

Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Radeon RX 5600M, R7 4800H, Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU: Ø1328 (819.36-1943.32)

Aorus 5 KB GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-10750H, ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro (ASX8200PNP-512GT): Ø2294 (2168.04-2300.38)

Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø3549 (3352.29-3568.72)

Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø255 (246.21-255.55)

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 2060 graphics core is an entry-level model in the GPU upper class. It can access fast GDDR6 graphics memory (6,144 MB). The results in the 3DMark benchmarks are at a normal level for the RTX 2060 GPU. Moreover, the "Extreme" Predator Sense GPU profile only provides a slight increase in performance. The UHD Graphics 630 chip that's integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution.

Nvidia specifies a clock range between 1,005 MHz (base) and 1,350 MHz (boost) for this DirectX 12 GPU. Higher speeds are feasible if the GPU doesn't reach a specified temperature and/or energy threshold. The maximum is 2,032 MHz. Our The Witcher 3 test is run at an average speed of 1,453 MHz and 1,645 MHz (GPU profile: Extreme), respectively.

3DMark 11 Performance		17684 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		36435 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		14732 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6011 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1925 - 43077, n=186, last 2 years)	26874 Points ∼100% +26%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	25706 Points ∼96% +21%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H (Extrem)	23152 Points ∼86% +9%
Aorus 5 KB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	22138 Points ∼82% +4%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	21748 Points ∼81% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	21480 Points ∼80% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (19143 - 24662, n=40)	21459 Points ∼80% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	21291 Points ∼79%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	19435 Points ∼72% -9%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	18219 Points ∼68% -14%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	14437 Points ∼54% -32%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (23059 - 192950, n=162, last 2 years)	105563 Points ∼100% +11%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	97919 Points ∼93% +3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	95500 Points ∼90%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (55324 - 116593, n=36)	93235 Points ∼88% -2%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	72335 Points ∼69% -24%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	66754 Points ∼63% -30%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	62787 Points ∼59% -34%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	55837 Points ∼53% -42%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	55325 Points ∼52% -42%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=194, last 2 years)	20253 Points ∼100% +25%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	18807 Points ∼93% +16%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H (Extrem)	17493 Points ∼86% +8%
Aorus 5 KB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16362 Points ∼81% +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (14768 - 18358, n=43)	16301 Points ∼80% +1%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	16151 Points ∼80%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	15967 Points ∼79% -1%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	15746 Points ∼78% -3%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	14358 Points ∼71% -11%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	13659 Points ∼67% -15%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	10550 Points ∼52% -35%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (429 - 13210, n=198, last 2 years)	7732 Points ∼100% +30%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H (Extrem)	6426 Points ∼83% +8%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Radeon RX 5600M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	6312 Points ∼82% +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (5660 - 6910, n=41)	6206 Points ∼80% +4%
Aorus 5 KB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	6123 Points ∼79% +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	6043 Points ∼78% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H	5940 Points ∼77%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5848 Points ∼76% -2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H	5616 Points ∼73% -5%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	5017 Points ∼65% -16%
MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AMD Radeon RX 5300M, AMD Ryzen 7 4800H	3539 Points ∼46% -40%

Gaming performance

The built-in CPU-GPU combination can bring all the latest games smoothly onto the screen. Full HD resolution and high to maximum quality settings can usually be selected. Higher resolutions (an appropriate monitor would have to be plugged in for this) require a reduction of the quality level. The "Extreme" GPU profile only produces a slight increase in frame rates (see comparison diagram).

The single-channel memory is responsible for the fact that some games achieve significantly lower frame rates at low settings than on comparably equipped laptops. A second memory module (= dual-channel mode active) would provide improvements.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (24.3 - 123, n=196, last 2 years)	77.8 fps ∼100% +20%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (Extrem)	70.3 fps ∼90% +8%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH317-54-75G8 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	68.5 (52^min) fps ∼88% +6%
Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, AMD Radeon RX 5600M	66.1 (62^min - 70^max) fps ∼85% +2%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-53-77N5 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	64.8 fps ∼83%
Aorus 7 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	62.8 fps ∼81% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile (50.6 - 74, n=40)	61.1 fps ∼79% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	60.5 (51^min - 68^max) fps ∼78% -7%
Schenker XMG Core 15 GK5NR0O AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	58.8 (48^min) fps ∼76% -9%
Aorus 5 KB Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile	57 (47^min) fps ∼73% -12%
Acer Predator Helios 300 PH315-52-79TY Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile	54.6 (48^min - 62^max) fps ∼70% -16%
HP Pavilion Gaming 15-ec1177ng AMD Ryzen 7 4800H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q