Notebookcheck Logo

HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) laptop review: An RTX 4070 gaming machine with an OLED display

Powerful picture. With the Omen 16, buyers are spoiled for choice between the "normal" version and the so-called Transcend variant which, in many respects, hardly differ from one another. Read our review to discover how the 16-inch device fares against the competition.
HP Omen Transcend 16

The Omen Transcend 16 review model - ending in u1095ng - can currently be had for just under $3,000. For this price, the buyer gets a Core i9-14900HX combined with a GeForce RTX 4070 that tends to belong more to the mid-range and not the high-end category due to its rather meagre 8 GB of VRAM. This is joined by 32 GB of DDR5-5600 RAM (2x 16 GB SO-DIMM) and a 1 TB M.2 NVMe SSD. The highlight is the vibrant OLED panel that is said to have 2,560 x 1,600 pixels, 240 Hz, 400 cd/m² and 100 % DCI P3. The package is rounded off with Windows 11 Home.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 356 x 269 ( = 0.79 x 14.02 x 10.59 in)
Battery
97 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.284 kg ( = 80.57 oz / 5.04 pounds), Power Supply: 790 g ( = 27.87 oz / 1.74 pounds)
Price
3000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Omen Transcend 16 competitor can be found in the form of other 16-inch gamers equipped with the GeForce RTX 4070 as well as the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 (Ultra 7 155H), the Schenker XMG Core 16 L23 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (Ryzen 7 7745HX) all of which appear in our comparison device table.

Since the chassis is mostly identical to the predecessor which had a Core i9-13900HX (see our review), we will only briefly go into the case, features and input device categories.

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.4 %
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
92.3 %
02/2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
10/2023
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

Case

The Transcend 16 offers an eye-catching design and, from a visual point of view, it cuts an impressively slim figure (all of the competing devices are thicker apart from the Zephyrus G16). When it comes to stability, the base unit at least manages to deliver solid performance. By contrast, the lid – as with so many devices – could have done with better torsional rigidity. At first glance, the matte surface has a premium look, however, HP has mostly only used plastic. No complaints can be made in terms of build quality. The manufacturer deserves praise for the generous 180° opening angle although the hinges could be stronger. When it comes to weight, at 2.3 kg, the device sits in the middle of the pack and this makes the 16-incher neither particularly light nor heavy. 

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Size comparison

363.4 mm / 14.3 inch 260.4 mm / 10.3 inch 26.8 mm / 1.055 inch 2.5 kg5.45 lbs358.4 mm / 14.1 inch 266.8 mm / 10.5 inch 26.1 mm / 1.028 inch 2.4 kg5.27 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 269 mm / 10.6 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2.3 kg5.14 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 269 mm / 10.6 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.3 kg5.04 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 246 mm / 9.69 inch 16.4 mm / 0.646 inch 1.8 kg4.01 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features

The port selection can be described as very modern. While the rear houses an RJ45 port (unfortunately not 2.5 Gbit LAN), an HDMI 2.1 output and a USB 3.0 port (type A), the left side is home to two Thunderbolt 4 ports (including Power Delivery) and an audio jack. On the right-hand side, there is only one lonely USB 3.0 port (type A). Buyers have to make do without a Kensington lock and a card reader.

Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3.5 mm audio jack
Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3.5 mm audio jack
Rear: network connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Rear: network connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Right side: USB-A 3.0
Right side: USB-A 3.0

Communication

The Wi-Fi performance is at a high level and with a send speed of almost 1,400 Mbit/s and around 1,700 Mbit/s when it comes to receiving data (1 m distance from the reference router) the performance is somewhere between good and very good. With the Wi-Fi 6E AX211, HP has installed an up-to-date Intel wireless module. 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1494 (1257min - 1548max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=152, last 2 years)
1274 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=182)
1245 MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1173 (839min - 1366max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1583 (1176min - 1662max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1438 (767min - 1513max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=158, last 2 years)
1406 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=182)
1394 MBit/s -18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -21%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Webcam

We have mixed feelings regarding the 2 MP webcam. While the image sharpness is above average, the color accuracy leaves a lot to be desired. What is good is the manual shutter for privacy.

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

Accessories

Our review device also came with a very slim 230-watt PSU as well as a HyperX headset (Cloud II Core wireless).

Maintenance

In terms of maintenance, the Omen 16 is not particularly complicated. After taking care of six, small, cross-headed screws, the base plate can be lifted from its anchored position with the help of a flat tool. Inside the device, all of the important components are accessible, be it the RAM banks, battery, M.2 slot, fans or the wireless module.  

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Warranty

The warranty is for 24 months.

Input devices

Keyboard

With its transparent WASD keys, HP has gone for a certain gamer look. The layout is very unique, and even takes some getting used to. The manufacturer has opted against installing a numerical keypad and, instead, it has given the 16-inch device separate, well-sized arrow keys. Other decisions (for example, the location of the power button) are really difficult to get your head around. The typing experience is mediocre and HP has had to use a mechanical model for better feedback. Fans of backlit keys can look forward to multiple colors.

HP Omen Transcend 16

Touchpad

At around 13.5 x 8.5 cm, the pleasingly large touchpad can be described as unassuming, when it comes to precision, smoothness, and click areas. Likewise, the gesture support is intuitive.

Display

Opinions differ when it comes to OLED panels. On the negative side, a few problems are the very reflective surfaces (which can make outdoor use tortuous), the screen flickering on every brightness level and the issue of potential burn-in.  

393
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 390 cd/m²
Contrast: 19500:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-4%
0%
-20%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.2
-1%
99.9
0%
68.3
-32%
70.4
-29%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
98.6
-1%
99.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97
87.6
-10%
96.9
0%
69.6
-28%
72.6
-25%
Response Times
-8093%
222%
-4850%
-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-13100%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
-10%
13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)
-6500%
7 ?(3.2, 3.8)
-3400%
Response Time Black / White *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-14000%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
-25%
6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)
-3200%
9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2)
-4450%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
2822%
960 ?(60)
700%
Screen
-47%
0%
-203%
-161%
Brightness middle
390
791.1
103%
416
7%
376
-4%
355.3
-9%
Brightness
392
800
104%
418
7%
358
-9%
340
-13%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
96
-2%
88
-10%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.04
-100%
0.33
-1550%
0.32
-1500%
Contrast
19500
19778
1%
1139
-94%
1110
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.94
4.37
-125%
1.6
18%
2.74
-41%
1.13
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.26
10.39
-144%
2.1
51%
6.78
-59%
2.78
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.21
1.04
75%
0.88
79%
0.32
92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
6.5
-333%
2.7
-80%
3.57
-138%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.221 99%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
6395 102%
6000 108%
6331 103%
7246 90%
6372 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2715% / -1647%
74% / 56%
-1691% / -828%
-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

In return, the OLED technology scores well with wonderful black levels (almost 0.0 cd/m²) which leads to an excellent contrast ratio that IPS panels don't come close to. The same applies to the viewing angle stability.

CalMAN: gray scales
CalMAN: gray scales
CalMAN: color saturation
CalMAN: color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN: gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN: color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

An additional highlight is the rich color space: 100 % DCI P3 and 97 % AdobeRGB are not something to be taken for granted in the gaming world. Things are similar in the area of color accuracy which was already impressive before calibration.  

HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3

Praise is also reserved for the short response times: Classic IPS panels can only dream of 0.2 ms. The predecessor's mini LED display was considerably brighter (800 vs. 392 cd/m²) but also significantly slower.

Front sunlight
Front sunlight
Subpixels
Subpixels
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17924 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100 % brightness
100 % brightness
80 % brightness
80 % brightness
60 % brightness
60 % brightness
40 % brightness
40 % brightness
20 % brightness
20 % brightness
0 % brightness
0 % brightness

Performance

Price-wise the Omen Transcend 16 starts at around $1,600. The entry-level variant is equipped with a Core i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 4060, 16 GB of RAM and a poor-resolution IPS display. Our review model finds itself more at the upper end of the price and specification scale.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Test conditions

The preinstalled gaming hub's performance management is somewhat difficult to access. In the according menu, three energy modes and a heat manager await. Since the performance mode  – analogous to most gaming laptops – ensures both better performance but also disproportionate noise production, all of the measurements were carried out using the balanced mode. Therefore, the determined values can only be compared to the predecessor to a limited extent. On top of this, the automatic fan control and automatic graphics switching were both active.

Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Ausgegleichen Leistung
Noise 39 dB(A) 44 dB(A) 53 dB(A)
Performance 60 fps lock 114 fps 126 fps

Processor

The Core i9-14900HX is almost outsized compared to the GPU power and case thickness. The Raptor Lake series 10 nm model offers 8 performance cores with hyper threading and 16 efficiency cores without HT which results in a total of 32 threads. In the balanced mode, the CPU only reaches its potential to a limited extent. The best example is our Cinebench loop: Although the performance was relatively high in the first few runs, after a short time, the score dropped quite sharply (but then it remained on a constant level). All in all, it is only sufficient to reach the level of the Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) or the Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16).

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
86.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
66.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
64.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
62 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (20702 - 32996, n=19)
29176 Points +41%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=229, last 2 years)
19422 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
18060 (17729.5min - 18059.9max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17205 Points -17%
Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2100 - 2235, n=19)
2184 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
1846 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=227, last 2 years)
1809 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8427 - 12419, n=19)
11095 Points +32%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=227, last 2 years)
7383 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (804 - 859, n=19)
835 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
717 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=227, last 2 years)
697 Points -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
686 Points -18%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 4875, n=19)
4436 Points +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=231, last 2 years)
3074 Points -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2978 (2861.03min - 2977.96max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (298 - 320, n=19)
309 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
270 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=230, last 2 years)
268 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
201 Seconds * -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
174 Seconds * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (102 - 164, n=19)
118.9 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (87555 - 127108, n=19)
112906 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=226, last 2 years)
76641 MIPS -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6206 - 7405, n=19)
7081 MIPS -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=226, last 2 years)
6113 MIPS -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -24%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (15849 - 18643, n=19)
17573 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16011 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18291, n=70, last 2 years)
13958 Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2800 - 3095, n=19)
2994 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=70, last 2 years)
2639 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 21606, n=19)
19389 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=231, last 2 years)
13504 Points -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2193, n=19)
2098 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2193, n=231, last 2 years)
1805 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (22.7 - 34.4, n=19)
29.7 fps +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
21.6 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=229, last 2 years)
21.1 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=223, last 2 years)
49.3 s * +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33.9 - 85.1, n=19)
44.9 s * +15%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
37.9 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.4706 sec * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=19)
0.3834 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3905 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
270 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
298 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
95.8 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89.8 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
72.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.8 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17244 - 29351, n=18)
25203 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=222, last 2 years)
18514 KRay/s +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (88537 - 148888, n=18)
126027 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=222, last 2 years)
93043 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (4267 - 7229, n=18)
6175 MB/s +45%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=222, last 2 years)
4297 MB/s +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148773, n=18)
138641 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118405 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=222, last 2 years)
108858 Points -8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (12217 - 18256, n=18)
15337 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12217 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=222, last 2 years)
12143 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43302 - 72594, n=18)
61653 Points +42%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=222, last 2 years)
47650 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=18)
126380 MB/s +45%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=222, last 2 years)
106724 MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71191 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1265 - 2149, n=18)
1808 MB/s +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1265 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=222, last 2 years)
1202 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1099 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (9170 - 16128, n=18)
13559 KRay/s +48%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=222, last 2 years)
10025 KRay/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33960 - 51118, n=18)
48364 MPixel/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=223, last 2 years)
36547 MPixel/s -26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28499 MPixel/s -42%

System performance

The system performance cuts a good figure without being amongst the front runners. When it comes to the RAM speed, the Transcend secures second spot in the comparison field.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=4)
8207 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=197, last 2 years)
7573 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11074 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11286, n=4)
10984 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=196, last 2 years)
10708 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=4)
10303 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10235 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7244 - 11833, n=196, last 2 years)
9727 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=4)
13291 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13229 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=196, last 2 years)
11407 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=3)
2208 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=167, last 2 years)
1876 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1694 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=3)
2063 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=167, last 2 years)
1787 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=3)
2399 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2222 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=167, last 2 years)
2040 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1862 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1769 - 2330, n=3)
2119 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1785 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=167, last 2 years)
1700 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (322 - 342, n=4)
334 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=193, last 2 years)
300 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 298, n=2)
294 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=160, last 2 years)
262 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=208, last 2 years)
521 ms * -19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (436 - 449, n=4)
442 ms * -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7866 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (56992 - 83392, n=18)
77554 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=222, last 2 years)
59056 MB/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (54443 - 86788, n=18)
83939 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=222, last 2 years)
62916 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50703 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (51387 - 78199, n=18)
74797 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=222, last 2 years)
61374 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54587 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -62%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=219, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (79.7 - 105, n=18)
84.3 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

As with the predecessor, the new Omen 16 also has to battle with relatively high latencies and this could lead to problems in some application scenarios (for example, processing audio and video in real time).

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Compared to the CPU performance, we observed no dips in the SSD's performance. The installed Kioxia drive is a little slower than the SK hynix drive found in the old Transcend but, despite this, it delivers sufficiently high speeds. What is a pity is that the 16-incher only has one M.2 slot and this means the built-in SSD will have to be replaced to expand the storage.

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
89.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
70.5 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
 
69.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
66.2 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
48.5 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4677 (4664.17min - 4676.56max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1291 - 7045, n=196, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s +11%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2735 - 4156, n=7)
3430 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4326 (4313.21min - 4326.48max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (3038 - 4893, n=7)
4036 MB/s +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=196, last 2 years)
3808 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6660 (6017.57min - 6659.93max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (6169 - 6985, n=7)
6562 MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1983 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)
6357 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5234 - 5667, n=7)
5444 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4926min - 4942.6max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)
4779 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.57min - 80.12max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=196, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (51.3 - 69.6, n=7)
60.9 MB/s +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 (243min - 243.65max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=196, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +75%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (116.4 - 219, n=7)
169.8 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4166.98min - 4173.4max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming
  (313 - 6172, n=196, last 2 years)
2576 MB/s +186%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (834 - 3829, n=7)
2172 MB/s +141%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3552 (3546.24min - 3551.63max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=196, last 2 years)
2147 MB/s +390%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (365 - 2682, n=7)
1389 MB/s +217%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00