Notebookcheck Logo

HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) laptop review: An RTX 4070 gaming machine with an OLED display

Powerful picture. With the Omen 16, buyers are spoiled for choice between the "normal" version and the so-called Transcend variant which, in many respects, hardly differ from one another. Read our review to discover how the 16-inch device fares against the competition.
HP Omen Transcend 16

The Omen Transcend 16 review model - ending in u1095ng - can currently be had for just under $3,000. For this price, the buyer gets a Core i9-14900HX combined with a GeForce RTX 4070 that tends to belong more to the mid-range and not the high-end category due to its rather meagre 8 GB of VRAM. This is joined by 32 GB of DDR5-5600 RAM (2x 16 GB SO-DIMM) and a 1 TB M.2 NVMe SSD. The highlight is the vibrant OLED panel that is said to have 2,560 x 1,600 pixels, 240 Hz, 400 cd/m² and 100 % DCI P3. The package is rounded off with Windows 11 Home.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng (Omen Transcend 16 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1980 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 130 W TDP, GDDR6, ForceWare 546.56, Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB SO-DIMM DDR5-5600, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, WQXGA, glossy: no, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, one M.2 slot (in use)
Soundcard
Intel Raptor Point-S PCH - HD Audio (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Realtek Gaming GBE Family Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20 x 356 x 269 ( = 0.79 x 14.02 x 10.59 in)
Battery
97 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 2 MP
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 230 W Power Supply, Hyper X Cloud II Core Wireless Gaming Headset, Omen Gaming Hub, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.284 kg ( = 80.57 oz / 5.04 pounds), Power Supply: 790 g ( = 27.87 oz / 1.74 pounds)
Price
3000 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Omen Transcend 16 competitor can be found in the form of other 16-inch gamers equipped with the GeForce RTX 4070 as well as the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 (Ultra 7 155H), the Schenker XMG Core 16 L23 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (Ryzen 7 7745HX) all of which appear in our comparison device table.

Since the chassis is mostly identical to the predecessor which had a Core i9-13900HX (see our review), we will only briefly go into the case, features and input device categories.

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.4 %
02/2024
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg20 mm16.00"2560x1600
87.9 %
08/2023
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
92.3 %
02/2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
89.2 %
10/2023
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg26.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
05/2023
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg26.8 mm16.00"2560x1600

Case

The Transcend 16 offers an eye-catching design and, from a visual point of view, it cuts an impressively slim figure (all of the competing devices are thicker apart from the Zephyrus G16). When it comes to stability, the base unit at least manages to deliver solid performance. By contrast, the lid – as with so many devices – could have done with better torsional rigidity. At first glance, the matte surface has a premium look, however, HP has mostly only used plastic. No complaints can be made in terms of build quality. The manufacturer deserves praise for the generous 180° opening angle although the hinges could be stronger. When it comes to weight, at 2.3 kg, the device sits in the middle of the pack and this makes the 16-incher neither particularly light nor heavy. 

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Size comparison

363.4 mm / 14.3 inch 260.4 mm / 10.3 inch 26.8 mm / 1.055 inch 2.5 kg5.45 lbs358.4 mm / 14.1 inch 266.8 mm / 10.5 inch 26.1 mm / 1.028 inch 2.4 kg5.27 lbs357 mm / 14.1 inch 269 mm / 10.6 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2.3 kg5.14 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 269 mm / 10.6 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.3 kg5.04 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 246 mm / 9.69 inch 16.4 mm / 0.646 inch 1.8 kg4.01 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features

The port selection can be described as very modern. While the rear houses an RJ45 port (unfortunately not 2.5 Gbit LAN), an HDMI 2.1 output and a USB 3.0 port (type A), the left side is home to two Thunderbolt 4 ports (including Power Delivery) and an audio jack. On the right-hand side, there is only one lonely USB 3.0 port (type A). Buyers have to make do without a Kensington lock and a card reader.

Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3.5 mm audio jack
Left side: 2x Thunderbolt 4 (PD), 3.5 mm audio jack
Rear: network connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Rear: network connector, RJ45 LAN, HDMI 2.1, USB-A 3.0
Right side: USB-A 3.0
Right side: USB-A 3.0

Communication

The Wi-Fi performance is at a high level and with a send speed of almost 1,400 Mbit/s and around 1,700 Mbit/s when it comes to receiving data (1 m distance from the reference router) the performance is somewhere between good and very good. With the Wi-Fi 6E AX211, HP has installed an up-to-date Intel wireless module. 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1654 (1599min, 1600.16P1 - 1713max) MBit/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1494 (1257min - 1548max) MBit/s +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1444 (1170min - 1766max) MBit/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1411 (1327min - 1472max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=153, last 2 years)
1272 MBit/s -10%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (464 - 1861, n=188)
1242 MBit/s -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1173 (839min - 1366max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1697 (849min - 1712max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1600 (1564min, 1564.87P1 - 1627max) MBit/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1583 (1176min - 1662max) MBit/s -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1438 (767min - 1513max) MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=159, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (582 - 1890, n=188)
1392 MBit/s -18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1339 (1216min - 1449max) MBit/s -21%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1411 (1327-1472)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1170-1766)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1494 (1257-1548)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1174 (839-1366)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1668 (849-1712)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1216-1449)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1582 (1176-1662)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1412 (767-1513)

Webcam

We have mixed feelings regarding the 2 MP webcam. While the image sharpness is above average, the color accuracy leaves a lot to be desired. What is good is the manual shutter for privacy.

ColorChecker
13.3 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: 11.02 ∆E min: 2.04 - max: 23.85 ∆E

Accessories

Our review device also came with a very slim 230-watt PSU as well as a HyperX headset (Cloud II Core wireless).

Maintenance

In terms of maintenance, the Omen 16 is not particularly complicated. After taking care of six, small, cross-headed screws, the base plate can be lifted from its anchored position with the help of a flat tool. Inside the device, all of the important components are accessible, be it the RAM banks, battery, M.2 slot, fans or the wireless module.  

HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16
HP Omen Transcend 16

Warranty

The warranty is for 24 months.

Input devices

Keyboard

With its transparent WASD keys, HP has gone for a certain gamer look. The layout is very unique, and even takes some getting used to. The manufacturer has opted against installing a numerical keypad and, instead, it has given the 16-inch device separate, well-sized arrow keys. Other decisions (for example, the location of the power button) are really difficult to get your head around. The typing experience is mediocre and HP has had to use a mechanical model for better feedback. Fans of backlit keys can look forward to multiple colors.

HP Omen Transcend 16

Touchpad

At around 13.5 x 8.5 cm, the pleasingly large touchpad can be described as unassuming, when it comes to precision, smoothness, and click areas. Likewise, the gesture support is intuitive.

Display

Opinions differ when it comes to OLED panels. On the negative side, a few problems are the very reflective surfaces (which can make outdoor use tortuous), the screen flickering on every brightness level and the issue of potential burn-in.  

393
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
391
cd/m²
393
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
389
cd/m²
392
cd/m²
395
cd/m²
390
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 395 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 391.8 cd/m² Minimum: 20 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 390 cd/m²
Contrast: 19500:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 1.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
97% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.221
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
ATNA60DL02-0 (SDC41A4), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
HP Omen Transcend 16
AUOA3A6, Mini-LED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
BOE0AF0 (), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-Q, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-4%
0%
-20%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
99.8
99.2
-1%
99.9
0%
68.3
-32%
70.4
-29%
sRGB Coverage
100
100
0%
100
0%
98.6
-1%
99.6
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
97
87.6
-10%
96.9
0%
69.6
-28%
72.6
-25%
Response Times
-8093%
222%
-4850%
-3925%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
26.4 ?(15, 11.4)
-13100%
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
-10%
13.2 ?(6.1, 7.1)
-6500%
7 ?(3.2, 3.8)
-3400%
Response Time Black / White *
0.2 ?(0.1, 0.1)
28.2 ?(21.6, 6.6)
-14000%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
-25%
6.6 ?(2.5, 4.1)
-3200%
9.1 ?(4.9, 4.2)
-4450%
PWM Frequency
120 ?(100)
3506 ?(100)
2822%
960 ?(60)
700%
Screen
-47%
0%
-203%
-161%
Brightness middle
390
791.1
103%
416
7%
376
-4%
355.3
-9%
Brightness
392
800
104%
418
7%
358
-9%
340
-13%
Brightness Distribution
98
95
-3%
96
-2%
88
-10%
91
-7%
Black Level *
0.02
0.04
-100%
0.33
-1550%
0.32
-1500%
Contrast
19500
19778
1%
1139
-94%
1110
-94%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.94
4.37
-125%
1.6
18%
2.74
-41%
1.13
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.26
10.39
-144%
2.1
51%
6.78
-59%
2.78
35%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
4.21
1.04
75%
0.88
79%
0.32
92%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.5
6.5
-333%
2.7
-80%
3.57
-138%
1.4
7%
Gamma
2.221 99%
2.28 96%
2.16 102%
2.4 92%
2.24 98%
CCT
6395 102%
6000 108%
6331 103%
7246 90%
6372 102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-2715% / -1647%
74% / 56%
-1691% / -828%
-1368% / -668%

* ... smaller is better

In return, the OLED technology scores well with wonderful black levels (almost 0.0 cd/m²) which leads to an excellent contrast ratio that IPS panels don't come close to. The same applies to the viewing angle stability.

CalMAN: gray scales
CalMAN: gray scales
CalMAN: color saturation
CalMAN: color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN: gray scales (calibrated)
CalMAN: color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

An additional highlight is the rich color space: 100 % DCI P3 and 97 % AdobeRGB are not something to be taken for granted in the gaming world. Things are similar in the area of color accuracy which was already impressive before calibration.  

HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs sRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs AdobeRGB
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3
HP Omen Transcend 16 vs DCI P3

Praise is also reserved for the short response times: Classic IPS panels can only dream of 0.2 ms. The predecessor's mini LED display was considerably brighter (800 vs. 392 cd/m²) but also significantly slower.

Front sunlight
Front sunlight
Subpixels
Subpixels
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.1 ms rise
↘ 0.1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

100 % brightness
100 % brightness
80 % brightness
80 % brightness
60 % brightness
60 % brightness
40 % brightness
40 % brightness
20 % brightness
20 % brightness
0 % brightness
0 % brightness

Performance

Price-wise the Omen Transcend 16 starts at around $1,600. The entry-level variant is equipped with a Core i7-13700HX, a GeForce RTX 4060, 16 GB of RAM and a poor-resolution IPS display. Our review model finds itself more at the upper end of the price and specification scale.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Test conditions

The preinstalled gaming hub's performance management is somewhat difficult to access. In the according menu, three energy modes and a heat manager await. Since the performance mode  – analogous to most gaming laptops – ensures both better performance but also disproportionate noise production, all of the measurements were carried out using the balanced mode. Therefore, the determined values can only be compared to the predecessor to a limited extent. On top of this, the automatic fan control and automatic graphics switching were both active.

Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Omen Gaming Hub
Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) Eco Ausgegleichen Leistung
Noise 39 dB(A) 44 dB(A) 53 dB(A)
Performance 60 fps lock 114 fps 126 fps

Processor

The Core i9-14900HX is almost outsized compared to the GPU power and case thickness. The Raptor Lake series 10 nm model offers 8 performance cores with hyper threading and 16 efficiency cores without HT which results in a total of 32 threads. In the balanced mode, the CPU only reaches its potential to a limited extent. The best example is our Cinebench loop: Although the performance was relatively high in the first few runs, after a short time, the score dropped quite sharply (but then it remained on a constant level). All in all, it is only sufficient to reach the level of the Ultra 7 155H (ROG Zephyrus G16) or the Ryzen 7 7840HS (Schenker XMG Core 16).

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

0210420630840105012601470168018902100231025202730294031503360357037803990Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø2840 (2582.31-3904.72)
HP Omen Transcend 16 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3989 (3846.15-4100.04)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2657 (2635.57-2681.14)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX: Ø2918 (2861.03-2977.96)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
86.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
Intel Core i9-13900HX
80.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
75.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -2!
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
66.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
65 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
62 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
60.4 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (20702 - 32996, n=23)
28969 Points +40%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
25932 (23977.8min - 25931.6max) Points +25%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
20702 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=234, last 2 years)
19653 Points -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
18060 (17729.5min - 18059.9max) Points -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
17205 Points -17%
Single Core
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2182 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2043 - 2235, n=23)
2175 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2105 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
1846 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=232, last 2 years)
1819 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1767 Points -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points -23%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8427 - 12419, n=23)
11018 Points +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
9895 Points +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
8427 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years)
7470 Points -11%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7072 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points -21%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6656 Points -21%
CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
836 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (779 - 859, n=23)
833 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
805 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
717 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years)
701 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
686 Points -18%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (3263 - 4875, n=24)
4398 Points +13%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
4100 (3846.15min - 4100.04max) Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
3905 (2582.31min - 3904.72max) Points
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years)
3111 Points -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2978 (2861.03min - 2977.96max) Points -24%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2681 (2635.57min - 2681.14max) Points -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points -31%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (287 - 320, n=24)
308 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
299 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
294 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
270 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years)
269 Points -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points -11%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
198.5 Seconds * -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
186 Seconds * -13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
174 Seconds * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
164 Seconds *
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
123 Seconds * +25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (102 - 164, n=23)
118.9 Seconds * +27%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (87555 - 127108, n=23)
112774 MIPS +28%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
105001 MIPS +19%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
88012 MIPS
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years)
77566 MIPS -12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
75557 MIPS -14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
73035 MIPS -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS -22%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
7244 MIPS +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
7142 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (6206 - 7508, n=23)
7105 MIPS -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
6866 MIPS -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6632 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years)
6142 MIPS -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS -24%
Geekbench 6.2
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (15849 - 18643, n=23)
17564 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
16011 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years)
14236 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
13088 Points -18%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (2800 - 3095, n=23)
2995 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2800 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2694 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years)
2666 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (8618 - 21606, n=23)
19446 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
19012 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
17612 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)
13658 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points -27%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
12378 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11803 Points -33%
Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1669 - 2210, n=23)
2102 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
2058 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
2053 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
2040 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1951 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)
1813 Points -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points -15%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (22.7 - 34.4, n=23)
29.6 fps +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
26.2 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
23.2 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
22.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
21.6 fps -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years)
21.3 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps -12%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
68.1 s * -28%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
53.1 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s * +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years)
49.3 s * +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33.9 - 85.1, n=23)
44.6 s * +16%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
43.8 s * +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
37.9 s * +29%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years)
0.4679 sec * -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec * -18%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4352 sec * -10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
0.421 sec * -6%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX
0.4028 sec * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX
0.3955 sec *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (0.3609 - 0.4225, n=23)
0.3818 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
3905 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
270 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
298 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
 
95.7 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
83.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72.1 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
29656 KRay/s +72%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27731 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (17244 - 29351, n=22)
25121 KRay/s +46%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
23600 KRay/s +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years)
18693 KRay/s +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17244 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (88537 - 148888, n=22)
125646 Points +42%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120974 Points +37%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118600 Points +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
117390 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years)
93857 Points +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88537 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (4267 - 7229, n=22)
6189 MB/s +45%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
5888 MB/s +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4974 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4920 MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years)
4348 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4267 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s -11%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (118405 - 148773, n=22)
138500 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126954 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
126217 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
118405 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years)
109886 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105028 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points -24%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15887 Points +30%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (12217 - 18256, n=22)
15333 Points +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15189 Points +24%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13440 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years)
12226 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12217 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points -13%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64255 Points +48%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
63114 Points +46%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (43302 - 72594, n=22)
61661 Points +42%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
58716 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years)
48017 Points +11%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43302 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (86964 - 241777, n=22)
138443 MB/s +59%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
111789 MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years)
108279 MB/s +25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
88619 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86964 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71191 MB/s -18%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (1265 - 2149, n=22)
1802 MB/s +42%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1689 MB/s +34%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1265 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years)
1218 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1147 MB/s -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1099 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
15975 KRay/s +74%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
14776 KRay/s +61%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (9170 - 16128, n=22)
13530 KRay/s +48%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12891 KRay/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years)
10121 KRay/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9170 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50609 MPixel/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49507 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (33960 - 51118, n=22)
48315 MPixel/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39928 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years)
36915 MPixel/s -25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28499 MPixel/s -42%

System performance

The system performance cuts a good figure without being amongst the front runners. When it comes to the RAM speed, the Transcend secures second spot in the comparison field.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7866 - 8550, n=5)
8270 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8206 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
8183 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
8153 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
7866 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
11302 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10621 - 11815, n=5)
11150 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
11074 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10934 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10621 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points -5%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10526 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9701 - 11103, n=5)
10388 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
10268 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10235 Points 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
9735 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
13370 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (12114 - 14827, n=5)
13282 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
13229 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
12920 Points +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
12114 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points -12%
CrossMark / Overall
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2002 - 2312, n=4)
2207 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2027 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1970 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1694 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1827 - 2191, n=4)
2075 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1812 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1629 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (2287 - 2458, n=4)
2389 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
2316 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2222 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1862 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1769 - 2330, n=4)
2102 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1785 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1557 Points
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1435 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
345 Points +1%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
342 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (322 - 342, n=5)
336 Points -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
331 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years)
301 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
288 Points -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points -17%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
300 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (291 - 301, n=3)
297 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
283 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years)
263 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms * -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
533 ms * -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years)
519 ms * -18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
471 ms * -8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
455 ms * -4%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (431 - 449, n=5)
439 ms * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 ms *

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7866 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
78330 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (56992 - 83392, n=22)
77573 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77103 MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67907 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years)
59613 MB/s -24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50007 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85070 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (54443 - 87507, n=22)
84273 MB/s -1%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84131 MB/s -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years)
63575 MB/s -25%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
60730 MB/s -29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
50703 MB/s -40%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84517 MB/s +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
77579 MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
76244 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (51387 - 78199, n=22)
74508 MB/s -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years)
61792 MB/s -20%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
54587 MB/s -30%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns * -62%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.9 ns * -2%
HP Omen Transcend 16
Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.8 ns * -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.5 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX
  (79.7 - 105, n=22)
84.1 ns * +3%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latencies

As with the predecessor, the new Omen 16 also has to battle with relatively high latencies and this could lead to problems in some application scenarios (for example, processing audio and video in real time).

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs * -59%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1566 μs *
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1518 μs * +3%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
673.1 μs * +57%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
603 μs * +61%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

Compared to the CPU performance, we observed no dips in the SSD's performance. The installed Kioxia drive is a little slower than the SK hynix drive found in the old Transcend but, despite this, it delivers sufficiently high speeds. What is a pity is that the 16-incher only has one M.2 slot and this means the built-in SSD will have to be replaced to expand the storage.

Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6967 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5341 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 511.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 400.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3599 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3651 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 125.3 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
89.8 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
74.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
70.6 pt
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
 
67.7 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
66.3 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
61.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
48.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4677 (4664.17min - 4676.56max) MB/s +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3449 (3368.24min - 3448.79max) MB/s +11%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2735 - 4156, n=8)
3434 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3102 (3080.64min - 3101.78max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3023 (3010.73min - 3023.25max) MB/s -3%
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4326 (4313.21min - 4326.48max) MB/s +42%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (3038 - 4893, n=8)
3945 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)
3829 MB/s +26%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3637 (3591.53min - 3636.88max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3152 (3026.22min - 3152.01max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3038 (2862.26min - 3038.15max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s -17%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7137 (6595.15min - 7137.45max) MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6899 (5306.42min - 6899.46max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6660 (6017.57min - 6659.93max) MB/s +4%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (6169 - 6985, n=8)
6612 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)
6390 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
6388 (5544.27min - 6387.72max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s -22%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6818 (6604.35min - 6817.63max) MB/s +30%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5716 (5661.68min - 5716.31max) MB/s +9%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5234 - 5667, n=8)
5454 MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5234 (5167.11min - 5234.47max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4943 (4926min - 4942.6max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)
4818 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s -38%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.57min - 80.12max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
64.2 (63.05min - 64.22max) MB/s +25%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (51.3 - 69.6, n=8)
60.1 MB/s +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
56.3 (55.9min - 56.3max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
51.3 (50.48min - 51.25max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
244 (243min - 243.65max) MB/s +90%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +75%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (116.4 - 219, n=8)
164.4 MB/s +28%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
146.3 (140.58min - 146.31max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
128.1 (123.78min - 128.05max) MB/s
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
127 (124.67min - 127.01max) MB/s -1%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4173 (4166.98min - 4173.4max) MB/s +364%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)
2590 MB/s +188%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (561 - 3829, n=8)
1971 MB/s +119%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1077 (1013.53min - 1077.14max) MB/s +20%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
932 (919.54min - 932.39max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
900 (832.36min - 900.34max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s -33%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3552 (3546.24min - 3551.63max) MB/s +711%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s +391%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (365 - 2682, n=8)
1266 MB/s +189%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
501 (456.23min - 501.33max) MB/s +14%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
438 (405.08min - 437.5max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
413 (372.31min - 412.68max) MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s -8%
AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8963 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6843 Points +33%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
6291 Points +22%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6198 Points +21%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (4465 - 8212, n=8)
6068 Points +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5138 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points -36%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3449 Points +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2508 Points +72%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (1359 - 3403, n=8)
2147 Points +47%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1603 Points +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
1523 Points +4%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
1458 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points -30%
Score Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
4064 Points +34%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3832 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3812 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3120 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3029 Points
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2518 - 3244, n=8)
2902 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points -40%
Seq Read
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
5625.54 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5621.18 MB/s 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
5588.41 MB/s -1%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (5197 - 5837, n=8)
5537 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4963 MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4362 MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s -35%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4010.3 MB/s +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3875.81 MB/s +8%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2824 - 5175, n=8)
3874 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)
3673 MB/s +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
3587.95 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3376 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s -46%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.46 MB/s +48%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)
66.9 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
61.2 MB/s +23%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (49.8 - 63.3, n=8)
58.5 MB/s +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
54.59 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
49.79 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s -15%
4K Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
211.54 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
191.79 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (147.9 - 209, n=8)
184.6 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
181.9 MB/s -5%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
177.87 MB/s -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s -18%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2813.87 MB/s +233%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)
1939 MB/s +129%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (773 - 2766, n=8)
1535 MB/s +82%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1105 MB/s +31%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
909.92 MB/s +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
845.48 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s -28%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
3498.72 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3293 MB/s +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3219.74 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)
2544 MB/s +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
2478.06 MB/s
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (2083 - 2535, n=8)
2330 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s -41%
Access Time Read
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.037 - 0.111, n=8)
0.06713 ms * -24%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.054 ms *
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)
0.05343 ms * +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms * +41%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.031 ms * +43%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.023 ms * +57%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms * +59%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.064 ms * -220%
HP Omen Transcend 16
SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N
0.054 ms * -170%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)
0.04639 ms * -132%
Average Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
  (0.02 - 0.071, n=8)
0.03913 ms * -96%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms * -15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.022 ms * -10%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02
0.02 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

036072010801440180021602520288032403600396043204680504054005760612064806840Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø6318 (5640.08-6341.89)
HP Omen Transcend 16 SK hynix PC801 HFS002TEJ9X101N: Ø6898 (5515.51-6944.88)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB: Ø7119 (6237.25-7138.29)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6087 (3287.84-6658.98)

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 4070 is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture and, performance-wise, it positions itself closer to the RTX 4060 than the RTX 4080. Despite the generous 130-watt TGP, the Omen 16 navigated our benchmark course in a slightly below-average manner although the difference to the competition is sometimes very small. The RTX 4070's future-proofing is rather poor due to the low amount of VRAM. In some games, 8 GB could already become a limiting factor. In our eyes, Nvidia should have given the GPU at least 12 GB, especially since laptops of this kind aren't exactly cheap. 

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
93.7 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
89.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
87.9 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
82.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.3 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
45606 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41090 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)
40513 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=50)
40358 Points +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39424 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
38784 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
37313 Points -5%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
169253 Points +51%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (54238 - 193851, n=20)
149792 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=142, last 2 years)
136246 Points +21%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112162 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
32810 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
30936 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)
29469 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (16212 - 33451, n=49)
29225 Points +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
28461 Points
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
27343 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
26568 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13040 Points +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
12617 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)
12072 Points +8%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11960 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6241 - 13391, n=49)
11762 Points +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11181 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10989 Points -2%
3DMark 11 Performance
32528 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
53528 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23683 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11682 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)
23.1 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
23 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds * +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 28, n=48)
21.5 Seconds * +7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20 Seconds * +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
19 Seconds * +17%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
19 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 172, n=52)
43.5 Seconds * -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)
40.2 Seconds * -12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
36 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
36 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
33 Seconds * +8%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
32 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
298 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX
298 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 428, n=48)
287 Seconds * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 7745HX
277 Seconds * +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX
222 Seconds * +26%

* ... smaller is better

Gaming performance

The Transcend 16 is fast enough to be able to play almost all games at its native 2,560 x 1,600 resolution and at high to maximum settings. Things only get problematic in very demanding or poorly optimized games such as Enshrouded. For 4K monitors, we recommend at least an RTX 4080.

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
97.4 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16 -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
94.7 pt
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
89.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
88.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
88.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
87.5 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
72.8 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
120 fps +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.8 (114min) fps +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114 fps
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
111.8 (102min) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=51)
111.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps -14%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.9 (3.81min, 76.9P1) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
116.1 (4.31min, 83.3P1) fps 0%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
115.8 (21.8min, 83.3P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (63.5 - 140.5, n=43)
112.1 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years)
107.7 fps -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps -15%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
124.8 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
119.9 fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (66 - 131.9, n=46)
112.2 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years)
111.6 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
108.3 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
100.8 fps -7%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
223 (89min, 167.8P1) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
218 (57.2min, 162.5P1) fps +12%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
208 (60.7min, 153.8P1) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years)
207 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (117.7 - 234, n=46)
197.7 fps +2%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
194.2 (59.2min, 144.5P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps -33%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
182 (152.8min) fps +18%
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
168.4 (146.6min) fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
154.1 (133.3min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (89.7 - 187.5, n=47)
150.3 fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years)
143.1 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
134.8 (119.8min) fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
131.6 (114.5min) fps -15%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
HP Omen Transcend 16
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
132.9 fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7745HX
117.8 fps +3%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
114.9 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (72.2 - 144.4, n=49)
107.9 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=245, last 2 years)
102.2 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R7 7840HS
85.5 fps -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H
81.2 fps -29%
Enshrouded - 2560x1440 Max. Quality AA:FX
Average of class Gaming
  (42.3 - 76, n=5, last 2 years)
60.9 fps +44%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
42.3 (24.7min, 28.4P0.1, 30.5P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (38.9 - 42.3, n=2)
40.6 fps -4%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
38.9 (26.5min, 28.9P0.1, 30.1P1) fps -8%
Palworld - 2560x1440 Epic Preset AA:TSR
Average of class Gaming
  (69.1 - 119.8, n=2, last 2 years)
94.5 fps +37%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
81.3 (33.5min, 35.1P0.1, 56.1P1) fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.1 - 81.3, n=2)
75.2 fps +9%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
69.1 (19.7min, 22P0.1, 49.9P1) fps
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown - 2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:SM
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
354 (18.9min, 190.3P0.1, 305P1) fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (325 - 354, n=2)
340 fps +5%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
325 (13.8min, 53.2P0.1, 210P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (35.3 - 355, n=3, last 2 years)
238 fps -27%
Ready or Not - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (84.8 - 144.3, n=4, last 2 years)
110.9 fps +31%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
95.6 (20.2min, 38.9P0.1, 55.1P1) fps +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (84.8 - 95.6, n=2)
90.2 fps +6%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
84.8 (20.1min, 21.4P0.1, 51.1P1) fps
The Finals - 2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (82.8 - 147.4, n=4, last 2 years)
115.9 fps +40%
XMG Pro 15 E23
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX
94.6 (58.2min, 65.2P0.1, 71.9P1) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (82.8 - 94.6, n=2)
88.7 fps +7%
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX
82.8 (50.1min, 52.1P0.1, 61.1P1) fps

We used the role-playing game, The Witcher 3 (FHD/Ultra) to see how the 3D performance fares over a longer period of time and even after roughly one hour, the frame rate remained very stable. 

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø113.2 (109-118)
HP Omen Transcend 16 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø105.7 (97-112)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23) R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø118.4 (110-125)
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø112.3 (106-121)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 181.2 175.3 115.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 114
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 202 178.9 167 154.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 147.5 108.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 166.6 141.7 114.9
Strange Brigade (2018) 272 220 194.2
The Finals (2023) 168 130.2 82.8
Ready or Not (2023) 194.2 134 84.8
Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) 358 358 325
Palworld (2024) 102.2 96.6 69.1
Enshrouded (2024) 66.6 56.5 42.3
Helldivers 2 (2024) 91.5 91.1 69.2

Emissions

Noise emissions

If you restrict yourself to using balanced mode, the 16-inch device doesn't get too loud. The 3D noise level of 44 to 47 dB(A) is audible but not annoying (the latter would apply to the performance mode with a recording of 50+ dB). In idle mode, the fans are continually active and run at an audible 29 to 31 dB(A) which is not quite optimal.

Noise Level

Idle
29 / 30 / 31 dB(A)
Load
45 / 47 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.441.835.539.938.62535.437.336.635.638.23148.746.244.244.245.74034.730.128.630.734.25030.529.230.429.131.46333.626.624.723.834.18028.621.819.614.930.410025.519.418.61625.412526.319.718.215.529.316027.820.519.617.730.220030.324.722.118.331.325027.119.817.716.131.23152818.818.311.93040029.51917.81133.150032.219.21811.933.763032.117.717.611.533.580032.117.517.212.234.3100034.719.118.911.436.4125035.719.41911.137.416003519.118.910.837.1200035.319.619.611.537.3250034.718.318.211.936315034.716.215.712.936.2400032.915.515.212.934.9500028.414.714.113.130.5630027.114.513.613.128.980002514.113.613.127.31000022.214.313.612.624.31250017.713.61312.418.51600016.313.412.511.715.5SPL45.129.729.324.546.9N4.91.21.10.65.7median 29.5median 18.8median 17.8median 12.4median 31.3Delta3.91.81.91.53.9hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise
-4%
7%
5%
10%
off / environment *
24
22.9
5%
23.9
-0%
23
4%
23.2
3%
Idle Minimum *
29
29.1
-0%
23.9
18%
23
21%
23.2
20%
Idle Average *
30
29.1
3%
27.8
7%
28.48
5%
23.2
23%
Idle Maximum *
31
29.1
6%
30.1
3%
28.48
8%
26.2
15%
Load Average *
45
45.7
-2%
34.2
24%
30
33%
31.4
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44
54.3
-23%
46.4
-5%
54.12
-23%
48.4
-10%
Load Maximum *
47
54.3
-16%
46.4
1%
54.12
-15%
53.8
-14%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

While the temperatures on the top of the laptop sit in the middle of the pack, the base of the case gets warmer than the competition under load. A maximum of 63 °C (when gaming) will prevent users from using the device placed on their lap. In idle operation, the situation is significantly more comfortable with the chassis remaining pleasantly cool at a maximum of 30 °C.

Max. Load
 47 °C
117 F
49 °C
120 F
45 °C
113 F
 
 43 °C
109 F
46 °C
115 F
42 °C
108 F
 
 31 °C
88 F
34 °C
93 F
33 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 49 °C = 120 F
Average: 41.1 °C = 106 F
62 °C
144 F
63 °C
145 F
53 °C
127 F
49 °C
120 F
49 °C
120 F
41 °C
106 F
36 °C
97 F
37 °C
99 F
34 °C
93 F
Maximum: 63 °C = 145 F
Average: 47.1 °C = 117 F
Power Supply (max.)  50 °C = 122 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.1 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 63 °C / 145 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat
5%
6%
4%
12%
Maximum Upper Side *
49
47.4
3%
50.3
-3%
46
6%
41.8
15%
Maximum Bottom *
63
54.4
14%
48
24%
44
30%
41.4
34%
Idle Upper Side *
30
28.4
5%
28.8
4%
32
-7%
29
3%
Idle Bottom *
29
29.2
-1%
29.8
-3%
33
-14%
30.4
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test

In the stress test using the Furmark and Prime95 tools, after 60 minutes, the CPU settled to around 85 °C, whereas the GPU hit 81 °C (a hotspot of 88 °C) – both relatively high but harmless values.

Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Furmark & Prime95
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3
Witcher 3

Speakers

The sound quality is somewhat better than the overall gaming laptop average, although, as is often the case, the bass struggles and it could be more powerful and precise. The maximum volume of 82 dB(A) is more than decent.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.842.62536.639.43143.141.1403133.75041.743.26325.831.28026.827.810029.526.312529.134.216023.642.720022.253.32502258.531516.260.940012.967.350012.768.163013.971.280011.673.5100011.368.8125011.170.6160011.374.3200011.873.7250011.968.931501366.1400013.266.8500013.267.9630013.171800013.265.91000013.168.31250012.768.61600012.162.6SPL25.882.4N0.855.7median 13.1median 67.9Delta3.15.536.143.62639.829.441.436.64732.638.426.743.323.85022.461.62166.118.963.618.269.322.972.717.27213.772.711.971.211.472.710.372.510.3719.674.19.575.4107410.469.410.769.611.266.511.566.411.765.511.768.411.865.111.76211.259.723.983.30.661.9median 11.7median 69.42.73.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ngAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Energy management

Power consumption

The energy requirements are similar to the standard values found in this performance category. 10 to 32 watts idle consumption and 128 to 242 watts consumption under load is neither particularly high nor low.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 10 / 18 / 32 Watt
Load midlight 128 / 242 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-42%
33%
12%
1%
-4%
Idle Minimum *
10
19.2
-92%
8.3
17%
11
-10%
8.1
19%
Idle Average *
18
22.7
-26%
12.5
31%
15.2
16%
15.9
12%
Idle Maximum *
32
55.4
-73%
12.8
60%
16
50%
37.2
-16%
Load Average *
128
128.4
-0%
71.3
44%
64
50%
90.9
29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
148.4
206
-39%
127.5
14%
179
-21%
189.6
-28%
Load Maximum *
242
292
-21%
169.1
30%
280
-16%
263.5
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø148.4 (143.6-156)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø186.1 (161-242)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.2 (10.5-31.9)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190Tooltip
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø110 (93.2-197)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø159.9 (158.2-163.7)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.2 (134-145.6)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø142.9 (132.4-150.1)
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.3 (11.5-34.3)

Battery life

When it comes to the energy requirements in battery mode, HP still has some work to do. Despite the powerful 97 Wh battery, the 16-inch machine only managed to last just short of 5 hours in our Wi-Fi test at a reduced brightness of 150 cd/m². As a comparison: The ROG Zyphrus G16 managed over 7 hours and the XMG Core 16 even lasted over 8 hours.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
4h 52min
HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng
i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
HP Omen Transcend 16
i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
SCHENKER XMG CORE 16 (L23)
R7 7840HS, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8
R7 7745HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-14%
49%
72%
-18%
26%
WiFi v1.3
292
250
-14%
435
49%
501
72%
240
-18%
Reader / Idle
375
392
Load
73
71
143
61
H.264
671
609

Pros

+ OLED's benefits: response time, contrast, viewing angle
+ decent speakers
+ 2x Thunderbolt 4
+ privacy shutter
+ speedy Wi-Fi

Cons

- limited Core i9-14900HX performance
- OLED's disadvantages: flickering, glossy surface
- pretty expensive for an RTX 4070 laptop
- battery life could be better
- only one M.2 slot

Verdict

Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: Review device provided by HP Germany
Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng: Review device provided by HP Germany

First and foremost, the Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng tries to draw in potential customers with a brilliant OLED display that speaks to both gamers and creators.

If you can deal with a very reflective screen and don't have a problem with flickering, you get a colourful display with an excellent contrast ratio and great response times, on top of superb black levels and viewing angles.

There are some minus points for emissions and speed. While the 16-inch machine gets unpleasantly loud in performance mode, the balanced mode's performance seems somewhat below average. Apart from that, the Omen Transcend 16 is similar to other gaming laptops regarding case quality, input devices and port selection.

Overall, the total score is comparable to that of the XMG Core 16 L23 or the Legion Pro 5 16ARX8. Anyone looking for an especially light and compact device in the 16-inch category should look at the new ROG Zeyphrus G16.

Price and availability

At the time of our review, the HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng with the Core i9-14900HX and the GeForce RTX 4070 is currently unavailable on HP's online store, Amazon or Best Buy.

HP Omen Transcend 16-u1095ng - 02/12/2024 v7
Florian Glaser

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 83%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 91%
Battery
63 / 95 → 66%
Display
94%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
76 / 90 → 85%
Audio
78%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
77%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Read all 6 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > HP Omen Transcend 16 (2024) laptop review: An RTX 4070 gaming machine with an OLED display
Florian Glaser, 2024-02-14 (Update: 2024-02-17)