Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 review - The gaming laptop now with G-Sync OLED and Intel Meteor Lake

Gaming meets high-end multimedia. Asus' new ROG Zephyrus G16 features a completely new and considerably slimmer design, with a target market in mind that goes beyond just gamers. The resulting product is a high-quality 16-inch laptop with an impressive OLED panel and excellent speakers that can easily compete with Apple's MacBook Pro or the Razer Blade 16. Update: 240 Hz screen refresh rate battery life tests added

Republic of Gamers—this stands for gaming laptops at Asus. When it comes to the new ROG Zephyrus G16 (and also the smaller G14), however, the manufacturer has altered its approach slightly, aiming to speak to further types of customers. To do so, it uses a flatter and more elegant case design, but this limits what components can be installed. The result is a high-end gaming/multimedia hybrid laptop which could also be interesting for content creators or, in general, users who are on the hunt for a stylish and powerful device. In fact, the new Zephyrus G16 is also the only 2024 gaming laptop from Asus to date that uses a new Meteor Lake processor from Intel. The smaller ROG Zephyrus G14 (review will be published soon), on the other hand, uses the new Ryzen 8000 processors from AMD.

Our test version of the ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605M isn't the high-end variant, as aside from its new Core Ultra 7 155H, it is equipped with the GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop. In addition, it now features an OLED display from Samsung which has a 240-Hz refresh rate and supports G-Sync for the first time. Furthermore, the laptop has 16 GB RAM and a 1-TB SSD installed. The new G16 is available to purchase from February 15th with prices starting from US$2,899.99; we can't yet name an MRSP for our test configuration.

February 5, 2024 update: Battery life tests with the OLED panel's refresh rate set to 240 Hz added. Please scroll down to the Runtimes section for details.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M (ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 Series)
Processor
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H 16 x 3.8 - 4.8 GHz, 70 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Meteor Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 80 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6
Memory
16 GB 
, LPDDR5x-7467, Dual-Channel, onboard
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH
Storage
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB 
, 855 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Meteor Lake-U/P/H PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Stereo, Card Reader: SDXC (UHS-II)
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.4 x 354 x 246 ( = 0.65 x 13.94 x 9.69 in)
Battery
90 Wh, 5820 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 1080p + IR
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 Speakers (4x 2W Woofers, 2x 2W Tweeters), Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
1.817 kg ( = 64.09 oz / 4.01 pounds), Power Supply: 583 g ( = 20.56 oz / 1.29 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
92.3 %
02/2024
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.8 kg16.4 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.4 %
08/2023
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg18.2 mm16.00"3200x2000
91.2 %
02/2023
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg21.99 mm16.00"2560x1600
86.2 %
03/2023
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18 mm16.00"3840x2400
88.6 %
07/2023
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1.6 kg17.1 mm16.00"2560x1600
88.8 %
07/2023
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.95 mm16.00"2560x1600
93.2 %
11/2023
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU
2.1 kg16.9 mm16.00"3456x2234

Case - The Zephyrus now made from aluminum

Asus' new Zephyrus G16 features an elegant aluminium unibody case and at first glance, you are immediately reminded of devices like the Razer Blade 16 or the Apple MacBook Pro 16. When handling the laptop, there is no doubt that this is a true premium device. Our test device is the dark-gray version (Eclipse Gray) and during the preview event at the end of last year, we also had a chance to take a look at the white variant (Platinum White). The white model is a little less of a fingerprint magnet but in turn, the dark-gray model is a little more inconspicuous. We also included a few pictures of the white variant in our photo gallery.

ROG logo and LED lighting
ROG logo and LED lighting
Speaker grill with 4,110 openings
Speaker grill with 4,110 openings

Asus has forgone the extensive dot-matrix display on the lid of the new model and in turn, it features a thin diagonal white light strip (Slash Lighting) consisting of 28 mini LEDs and 7 different zones. It can be programmed (for example, as a notification light) or alternatively, it can be completely deactivated if you don't to draw too much attention to the device. Aside from the keyboard, there are no further illuminated elements.

By default, the LED bar pulsates in standby mode, but this can be deactivated.
By default, the LED bar pulsates in standby mode, but this can be deactivated.
The cooler openings at the back direct warm air towards the floor and not directly towards the lower edge of the screen, which limits the laptop's opening angle.
The cooler openings at the back direct warm air towards the floor and not directly towards the lower edge of the screen, which limits the laptop's opening angle.

The device's build and stability are astounding and the keyboard practically can't be pressed in at all—even using lots of pressure. Creaking noises are also foreign to the Zephyrus. The thin display lid is a little more flexible but we noted no issues here, either. However, the new hinge design limits the laptop's maximum opening angle to 135 degrees. The lid can easily be opened with one hand but for our taste, the hinge could do with being set a little more tightly, as it wobbles quite a bit when you adjust the angle. 

The new ROG Zephyrus G16 is one of the most compact models in our comparison field and together with the Vision 16 Pro and the MacBook Pro, its 16.4 mm make it one of the thinnest models, too. However, it should also be noted that our test device is the thinnest version of the range, as the TFT models and Vapor-Chamber models are a little thicker. It is lightweight as well, weighing 1.8 kg; the 200-watt power supply adds an additional 583 grams onto the scales.

Size comparison

362.5 mm / 14.3 inch 245 mm / 9.65 inch 18.2 mm / 0.717 inch 2.2 kg4.91 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 244 mm / 9.61 inch 21.99 mm / 0.866 inch 2.4 kg5.34 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 19.95 mm / 0.785 inch 2 kg4.45 lbs355.7 mm / 14 inch 248.1 mm / 9.77 inch 16.9 mm / 0.665 inch 2.1 kg4.73 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 255 mm / 10 inch 18 mm / 0.709 inch 2.1 kg4.63 lbs353.7 mm / 13.9 inch 245.3 mm / 9.66 inch 17.1 mm / 0.673 inch 1.6 kg3.55 lbs354 mm / 13.9 inch 246 mm / 9.69 inch 16.4 mm / 0.646 inch 1.8 kg4.01 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Connectivity - Thunderbolt and speedy WLAN

The back is completely taken up by the cooling, which is why the ports are spread out between both sides of the laptop. Asus now uses a new rectangular power supply connector which has been placed on the back left of the case. The device features all the important connections, as aside from USB-C, it also has USB-A, a full HDMI output and a card reader. Both USB-C ports support Power Delivery at up to 100 watts and the one on the left supports Thunderbolt 4. It just doesn't have an Ethernet connection—if required, you will have to use a USB adapter.

Left: Power supply, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4 (40 GBit/s, DisplayPort 2.1, Power Delivery), USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/s)
Left: Power supply, HDMI 2.1, USB-C 4.0 with Thunderbolt 4 (40 GBit/s, DisplayPort 2.1, Power Delivery), USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/s)
Right: SD card reader (UHS-II), USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery)
Right: SD card reader (UHS-II), USB-A 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/s), USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (10 GBit/s, DisplayPort 1.4, Power Delivery)

SD card reader

The G16 has a full-featured card reader on the right side, whereby inserted cards jut out by about 1.2 cm. In combination with our reference card (Angelbird AV Pro V60), it achieved transfer rates of around 80-90 MB/s, meaning the test device came out near the bottom. 

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
181.2 (133.5min - 187.53max) MB/s +130%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
163.3 MB/s +107%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
158 (154.8min - 166.31max) MB/s +101%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
125 MB/s +59%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=100, last 2 years)
98.4 MB/s +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
78.7 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
74.6 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
23.3 MB/s -70%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
226.7 MB/s +152%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
207.6 MB/s +131%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
188.81 MB/s +110%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
180.68 MB/s +101%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years)
121.3 MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
89.9 MB/s
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H (Angelibird AV Pro V60)
82.9 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
26.1 MB/s -71%

Communication

Swappable WLAN module
Swappable WLAN module

Asus has forgone Wi-Fi 7 but even so, the AX211 module from Intel is still an up-to-date WLAN adapter that supports Bluetooth 5.3 as well as Wi-Fi 6E. Together with our reference router from Asus, its transfer rates were very good and stable and during our test period, we had no issues surrounding signal quality.

Networking
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1654 (min: 1599) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1600 (min: 1564) MBit/s ∼91%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1618 (min: 1527) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1547 (min: 1409) MBit/s ∼88%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1155 (min: 495) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1328 (min: 1093) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1371 (min: 1036) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1494 (min: 1283) MBit/s ∼93%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1444 (min: 745) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1611 (min: 805) MBit/s ∼100%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1630 (min: 1571) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1687 (min: 1665) MBit/s ∼96%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1325 (min: 977) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1364 (min: 675) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1612 (min: 1573) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 731) MBit/s ∼90%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1726 (min: 1684) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1752 (min: 1702) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1654 (1599-1713)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1600 (1564-1627)

Webcam

The 1080p webcam installed into the upper display frame takes decent photos in good lighting conditions and it also supports functions like facial tracking and soft focus. It features an additional IR camera for facial recognition via Windows Hello.

ColorChecker
6.7 ∆E
7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
9 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
7 ∆E
7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M: 7.45 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 13.28 ∆E

Maintenance

Aside from the visible screws, two further ones are hidden beneath glued-on rubber covers. This makes accessing the components unnecessarily difficult. However, you can't really get up to much on the inside anyway, as the RAM is now soldered on. On the flip side, there are two slots for SSDs and if desired, the WLAN module and battery can be swapped out. You can also access the fans to clean them.

Internal build
Internal build
Two hidden screws beneath glued-on rubber feet
Two hidden screws beneath glued-on rubber feet

Input devices - Comfortable keyboard and huge touchpad

The G16 features a backlit keyboard (one RGB zone, 3 intensity levels) with no dedicated number pad. The layout isn't anything out of the ordinary but you do have to get used to the single-line Enter key as well as the small arrow keys—this isn't ideal for a gaming laptop. The keyboard itself is, however, extremely comfortable and its keys have a generous lift of 1.7 mm. It is quite quiet in everyday use and you can easily use it to write longer texts. 

Input devices
Input devices
Keyboard lighting (here in blue, for example)
Keyboard lighting (here in blue, for example)

The laptop's new touchpad is extremely large, measuring 15 x 9.9 cm (37 % bigger than before) with a 16:10 ratio. It feels great to operate thanks to its smooth surface, and its clicking noise is nice and muffled, giving it a high-quality feel.

Display - Asus' first 240-Hz OLED with G-Sync

Subpixel array
Subpixel array

The new ROG Zephyrus G16 is the first laptop to have a 16-inch OLED panel that supports G-Sync. Furthermore, its refresh rate is 240 Hz and subjectively, the reflective Samsung panel's picture quality is just astounding: Content is razor-sharp and colors look super vivid. Thanks to its fast response times, the OLED is also perfect for gaming. Asus hasn't installed a brightness sensor.

In SDR mode, it has an average brightness of 420 cd/m², which is a good result. As is typical for OLED, it has a black value of 0, leading to an extremely high contrast ratio. Asus has stated a maximum HDR brightness of 500 cd/m², whereas we measured a peak of 455 cd/m². In this aspect, the Samsung panel can't quite keep up with other OLED monitors and especially the mini LED panel installed into Apple's MacBook Pro 16 (max. 1,600 cd/m²). Moreover, we have to continue to critique Windows' HDR implementation, as it has to be activated manually and subsequently, the color profiles don't work right anymore. This currently affects all Windows devices. Due to the OLED panel's build, it doesn't suffer from any halo effects. 

420
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
419
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
416
cd/m²
418
cd/m²
425
cd/m²
410
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
ATNA60DL01-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 425 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 418.2 cd/m² Minimum: 19.7 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 416 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
96.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
ATNA60DL01-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
LEN160-3.2K, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
AUO26A9, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.00
Display
-2%
-3%
-0%
-20%
-5%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
99.9
97
-3%
98.5
-1%
99.9
0%
68.8
-31%
96.4
-4%
99.2
-1%
sRGB Coverage
100
99.8
0%
100
0%
100
0%
98.8
-1%
99.7
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
96.9
95.1
-2%
89.7
-7%
96.4
-1%
70
-28%
84.8
-12%
Response Times
-3113%
-3800%
-532%
-4634%
-2020%
-15400%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.22 ?(0.11, 0.11)
14 ?(7.5, 6.5)
-6264%
6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2)
-2900%
2 ?(1, 1)
-809%
13.7 ?(6.7, 7)
-6127%
4.4 ?(2.2, 2.2)
-1900%
66.9 ?(29.4, 37.5)
-30309%
Response Time Black / White *
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
9.2 ?(2.2, 7)
-3580%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
-4700%
1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48)
-692%
8.1 ?(3.8, 4.3)
-3140%
5.6 ?(2.2, 3.4)
-2140%
43.6 ?(13.6, 30)
-17340%
PWM Frequency
960 ?(60)
5800 ?(100)
504%
60
-94%
14877
1450%
Screen
15%
-55%
-19%
-84%
-69%
19%
Brightness middle
416
539
30%
456.8
10%
389.97
-6%
384
-8%
424
2%
630
51%
Brightness
418
546
31%
437
5%
395
-6%
371
-11%
411
-2%
604
44%
Brightness Distribution
96
96
0%
83
-14%
97
1%
88
-8%
88
-8%
94
-2%
Black Level *
0.18
0.35
0.03
0.3
0.37
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.4
12%
3.7
-131%
2
-25%
3.4
-113%
3.04
-90%
1.2
25%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.1
2.1
-0%
6.42
-206%
4.1
-95%
9.2
-338%
7.5
-257%
2.8
-33%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.7
2.2
19%
2.6
4%
2.23
17%
3.4
-26%
4.34
-61%
1.9
30%
Gamma
2.16 102%
2.19 100%
2.3 96%
2.41 91%
2.16 102%
2.32 95%
2.29 96%
CCT
6331 103%
6479 100%
6108 106%
6323 103%
7462 87%
6952 93%
6812 95%
Contrast
2994
1305
12999
1280
1146
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.66
1.68
1.3
3.04
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1033% / -771%
-1286% / -722%
-184% / -143%
-1579% / -894%
-698% / -407%
-5127% / -4609%

* ... smaller is better

The Armoury-Crate software gives you different color profiles to select from, which we analyzed using the professional CalMAN software (X-Rite i1 Pro2). The pre-selected profile Native is great for everyday use, but the colors are a little too oversaturated. To ensure the best color accuracy, you should go for the profile Display P3. Gray tones may still show some deviations (but without a color tint), however, its color accuracy compared to the P3 reference is already excellent and all colors show deviations below the important value of 3.

CalMAN grayscale (profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN grayscale (profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN saturation (profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN saturation (profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: Native, target color space P3)
CalMAN grayscale (profile: Display P3, target color space P3)
CalMAN grayscale (profile: Display P3, target color space P3)
CalMAN saturation (profile: Display P3, target color space P3)
CalMAN saturation (profile: Display P3, target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: Display P3, target color space P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: Display P3, target color space P3)

We additionally calibrated the display ourselves—with mixed results. Although we were able to improve grayscale deviations ever so slightly, this resulted in larger color deviations and all-in-all, it didn't really improve the situation. This is why we aren't making the corresponding profile available for download. The display covers the P3 color space in its entirety, but it also features a very accurate sRGB mode, in case you would like to edit photos or videos in the smaller color space. 

CalMAN grayscale (profile: sRGB, target color space sRGB)
CalMAN grayscale (profile: sRGB, target color space sRGB)
CalMAN saturation (profile: sRGB, target color space sRGB)
CalMAN saturation (profile: sRGB, target color space sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: sRGB, target color space sRGB)
CalMAN ColorChecker (profile: sRGB, target color space sRGB)
vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. P3
vs. P3
vs. Adobe
vs. Adobe

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.13 ms rise
↘ 0.12 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.11 ms rise
↘ 0.11 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 960 Hz ≤ 60 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 60 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17903 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

PWM 0% brightness
PWM 0% brightness
PWM 20% brightness
PWM 20% brightness
PWM 40 % brightness
PWM 40 % brightness
PWM 60 % brightness
PWM 60 % brightness
PWM 80 % brightness (DC Dimming)
PWM 80 % brightness (DC Dimming)
PWM 100 % brightness (DC Dimming)
PWM 100 % brightness (DC Dimming)

In general, the new OLED panel runs using PWM at a frequency of 960 Hz but at brightness levels over 60 %, it makes use of less-harmful DC dimming (at 240 Hz). As soon as the brightness falls beneath this level, a warning pops up stating that DC dimming is no longer available. As was already the case on other OLED laptops from Asus, you get the chance to dim the display using software which lets you continue to use DC dimming. We would just wish to see this control being combined with the regular brightness control in order to maximize comfort.

Outside (clouded day)
Outside (clouded day)
In the sun
In the sun

The Zephyrus G16 does really well outside and even on sunny days, you can use it well—as long as you stay out of direct sunlight. Its viewing-angle stability is great and only large deviations from the center lead to a slight blue shimmer being noticeable, but this is typical for OLED panels. 

Viewing-angle stability
Viewing-angle stability

Performance - The Zephyrus now with Meteor Lake

 
 
 

Testing conditions

Within its Armoury-Crate software, Asus offers a variety of energy profiles as well as a manual mode that lets you individually set the GPU/CPU performance. We put together the energy profiles' values in the following table. It should be noted, however, that these values only count for the configurations featuring the 4070/4060/4050 Laptop which are fitted with conventional heat pipes and three fans. The more powerful models with the RTX 4080/4090 Laptop, on the other hand, have a Vapor-Chamber cooling system with two fans, which is why the processor and GPU consume more power (in all profiles). 

Energy profile CPU load CB R23 Multi GPU load Time Spy graphics Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra max. fan emissions
Quiet 60->45 watts 15,869 points 65 watts 9,042 points 32.6 fps 41.5 dB(A)
Performance 70->50 watts 17,133 points 80 watts 10,989 points 43.7 fps 46.4 dB(A)
Turbo 95->70 watts 18,372 points 105 watts 12,312 points 48.7 fps 52.4 dB(A)

After several tests, we decided to run the following benchmarks and measurements using performance mode. Although you might not get the maximum performance, the fans remain bearable when playing games, as noise emissions from about 48 dB(A) are hard to tolerate. Thanks to its great speakers, you can even get away with playing without headphones with performance mode selected. Even so, if you require the maximum performance possible, then you can easily switch modes with the push of a button (however, turbo is only available when connected to the mains). During simple tasks, you should select quiet mode, as otherwise, the fans can almost always be heard.

Processor - Core Ultra 7 155H

We already took a look at the new Meteor-Lake-gen Core Ultra 7 155H in our analysis article. With power limits of 70/50 watts, the processor does well—but there is no real difference to the old Raptor-Lake chips such as the Core i7-13700H and this also doesn't change when you select turbo mode. Its single-core performance is slightly weaker, however, and we are already looking forward to seeing how Meteor Lake fares against the new Ryzen-8000 CPUs. All-in-all, its multi-core performance remains very constant in total. In battery use, the CPU performance remains constant. Further CPU benchmarks can be found here.

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Intel Core Ultra 7 155H: Ø2533 (2383.65-2679.17)
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 Intel Core i7-13705H: Ø2816 (2725.35-2987.08)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23) Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2126 (2076.41-2253.14)
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø2552 (2375.16-3030.99)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max Apple M3 Max 16-Core: Ø3354 (3260.25-3391.27)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
26736 (22394.1min - 26736.1max) Points +55%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
24024 Points +39%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
20034 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
19675 Points +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=234, last 2 years)
19653 Points +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
19188 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
17267 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
14760 Points -15%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
2029 Points +21%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
1968 Points +17%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
1885 Points +12%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
1879 Points +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1854 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=232, last 2 years)
1819 Points +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1707 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1681 Points
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
8697 Points +30%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
7674 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
7529 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=232, last 2 years)
7470 Points +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
7254 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6682 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
6327 Points -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
5672 Points -15%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
742 Points +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
732 Points +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
729 Points +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
719 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=232, last 2 years)
701 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
693 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
651 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
497 Points -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
4529 (4463.29min - 4528.99max) Points +69%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
3401 (3260min - 3401max) Points +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=237, last 2 years)
3111 Points +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
2987 (2725.35min - 2987.08max) Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
2963 (2772.58min - 2962.96max) Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
2854 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2679 (2383.65min - 2679.17max) Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
2253 (2076.41min - 2253.14max) Points -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
276 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
274 Points +4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
274 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
273 Points +3%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
269 Points +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=236, last 2 years)
269 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
264 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
243 Points -8%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
223 Seconds * -16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
215 Seconds * -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
198.5 Seconds * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
193 Seconds *
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
172 Seconds * +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
172 Seconds * +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
169 Seconds * +12%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
114 Seconds * +41%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
109330 MIPS +60%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
78446 MIPS +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=231, last 2 years)
77566 MIPS +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
76344 MIPS +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
74386 MIPS +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
68500 MIPS
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
61921 MIPS -10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
6445 MIPS +18%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
6224 MIPS +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=231, last 2 years)
6142 MIPS +13%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
6125 MIPS +13%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
5924 MIPS +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
5570 MIPS +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
5439 MIPS
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
21243 Points +59%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
14502 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (5340 - 18590, n=76, last 2 years)
14236 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
13323 Points
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
3096 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (1599 - 3095, n=76, last 2 years)
2666 Points +11%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
2588 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
2410 Points
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
22816 Points +77%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
18152 Points +41%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
14521 Points +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
13796 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)
13658 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
13239 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
12905 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
11808 Points -9%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2331 Points +33%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
1885 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
1829 Points +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)
1813 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
1805 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
1791 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
1755 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
1718 Points -2%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
28.7 fps +44%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
21.3 fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=234, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
21 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
19.9 fps
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
19.7 fps -1%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
16.6 fps -17%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
57.8 s * -17%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
54.6 s * -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
49.6 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=229, last 2 years)
49.3 s * +1%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
47.7 s * +4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
47.6 s * +4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
47.5 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H
0.4934 sec * -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=231, last 2 years)
0.4679 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
0.4654 sec *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H
0.4571 sec * +2%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.4498 sec * +3%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H
0.434 sec * +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX
0.4121 sec * +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2679 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
173.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
264 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
98.1 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73.9 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73.3 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
71.4 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66.2 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
57.6 pt
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
 
57.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
25857 KRay/s +57%
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=227, last 2 years)
18693 KRay/s +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
18385 KRay/s +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
17934 KRay/s +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
17568 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
16431 KRay/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
13486 KRay/s -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (6670 - 18470, n=25)
13154 KRay/s -20%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125944 Points +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=227, last 2 years)
93857 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
92250 Points +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90834 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
85461 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81656 Points -4%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70104 Points -18%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (43630 - 93181, n=25)
69102 Points -19%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
6350 MB/s +66%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=227, last 2 years)
4348 MB/s +14%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
4189 MB/s +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4187 MB/s +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
4080 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3814 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (1940 - 4436, n=25)
3215 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
3200 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
133226 Points +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=227, last 2 years)
109886 Points +22%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
106736 Points +18%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105597 Points +17%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
99961 Points +11%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
95175 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
90347 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64698 - 93266, n=25)
84034 Points -7%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
15813 Points +49%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=227, last 2 years)
12226 Points +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
11077 Points +4%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
11050 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10641 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
10485 Points -1%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (5639 - 10641, n=25)
9122 Points -14%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8982 Points -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
63308 Points +51%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=227, last 2 years)
48017 Points +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44967 Points +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44154 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
42686 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
41806 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (21052 - 47685, n=25)
33830 Points -19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
33488 Points -20%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149377 MB/s +88%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
125644 MB/s +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=227, last 2 years)
108279 MB/s +36%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
85118 MB/s +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81504 MB/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
79475 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (45713 - 152179, n=25)
75133 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66616 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
1850 MB/s +64%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
1226 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=227, last 2 years)
1218 MB/s +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1192 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
1032 MB/s -9%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (557 - 1250, n=25)
950 MB/s -16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
13844 KRay/s +64%
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=227, last 2 years)
10121 KRay/s +20%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9803 KRay/s +16%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
9680 KRay/s +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
9166 KRay/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
8449 KRay/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
7240 KRay/s -14%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (3569 - 9802, n=25)
6875 KRay/s -19%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
52257 MPixel/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
50834 MPixel/s +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49238 MPixel/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (32719 - 54223, n=25)
46865 MPixel/s -5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
46114 MPixel/s -6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44611 MPixel/s -9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44545 MPixel/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=228, last 2 years)
36915 MPixel/s -25%

System performance

Subjectively, the laptop performs well—only during graphics switching (e.g. booting up games) does it hang slightly during the MUX switch, but this is completely normal. The competition achieved more points in the synthetic tests, however, you won't likely notice the difference in everyday use. Its memory benchmark results were excellent, but its RAM can't be expanded and 16 GB on a high-end device is simply not enough. All models should have 32 GB as standard.

PCMark 10 / Score
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
8058 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7888 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=200, last 2 years)
7592 Points +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7368 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7329 Points +3%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (7084 - 7761, n=3)
7323 Points +3%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7301 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
7123 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11332 Points +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11078 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10994 Points +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10753 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=199, last 2 years)
10731 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10491 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10038 - 10393, n=3)
10254 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10038 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=199, last 2 years)
9725 Points +6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9511 Points +3%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
9376 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (9192 - 9422, n=3)
9274 Points +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9231 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
9208 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8858 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
8271 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
14535 Points +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
13575 Points +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years)
11476 Points +8%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (10100 - 13035, n=3)
11249 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
10860 Points +2%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10849 Points +2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
10691 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
10612 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
2051 Points +19%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1896 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1882 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=170, last 2 years)
1881 Points +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1835 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1789 Points +4%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1721 - 1848, n=3)
1777 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1721 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1592 Points -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
1828 Points +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1822 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=170, last 2 years)
1791 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1781 Points +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1705 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1698 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1624 - 1750, n=3)
1686 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1624 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1509 Points -7%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
2564 Points +32%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2104 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=170, last 2 years)
2046 Points +5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2012 Points +4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1978 Points +2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1913 - 2014, n=3)
1956 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1942 Points
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1936 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1780 Points -8%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1915 Points +34%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
1789 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=170, last 2 years)
1704 Points +20%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
1635 Points +15%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (1424 - 1683, n=3)
1561 Points +10%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1535 Points +8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
1486 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1424 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1342 Points -6%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
426 Points +51%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
301 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (215 - 480, n=196, last 2 years)
301 Points +6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
299 Points +6%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
297 Points +5%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (283 - 294, n=3)
287 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
283 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
269 Points -5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
231 Points -18%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
279 Points +9%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
274 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
268 Points +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
264 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (157.9 - 328, n=163, last 2 years)
263 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
256 Points
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (254 - 257, n=3)
256 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
234 Points -9%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
563 ms * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
548 ms *
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (546 - 548, n=2)
547 ms * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (421 - 824, n=211, last 2 years)
519 ms * +5%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
509 ms * +7%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
505 ms * +8%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
494 ms * +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
474 ms * +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
391.7 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score
7123 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
89414 MB/s
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (62397 - 95631, n=25)
85966 MB/s -4%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
78047 MB/s -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
77060 MB/s -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69289 MB/s -23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
66344 MB/s -26%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
65071 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=227, last 2 years)
59613 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
86576 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
84869 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (60544 - 90647, n=25)
81502 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
77976 MB/s -10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73950 MB/s -15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
70707 MB/s -18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68252 MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=227, last 2 years)
63575 MB/s -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95196 MB/s +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
80441 MB/s +10%
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (64852 - 93451, n=25)
74035 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
73337 MB/s
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71464 MB/s -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68170 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67041 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=227, last 2 years)
61792 MB/s -16%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
  (125.8 - 173, n=25)
143.5 ns * -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
140 ns *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
115 ns * +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
99.5 ns * +29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94.4 ns * +33%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
87.6 ns * +37%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=224, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +38%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
84.2 ns * +40%

* ... smaller is better

DPC latency

In our standardized latency test (surfing the web, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), the test device with the current BIOS version showed slight limitations when using real-time audio applications.

LatencyMon - overview
LatencyMon - overview
LatencyMon - drivers
LatencyMon - drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
18226.8 μs * -634%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4358.5 μs * -75%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2484.4 μs *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2448.6 μs * +1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1053.8 μs * +58%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
893 μs * +64%

* ... smaller is better

Storage devices

A second M.2-2280 slot is available.
A second M.2-2280 slot is available.

The new G16 has two M.2-2280 slots which are connected via PCIe 4.0. The 1-TB version of the Western Digital SN560 is installed into our test device and although it delivered good transfer rates of up to 5 GB/s, it isn't one of the fastest drives on the market. At least its performance remains constant even under permanent load. Ex-works, users have 855 GB free to use. Further SSD benchmarks can be found here.

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4970 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3496 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 468 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 46.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 115.5 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 372 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 779 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
93.8 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
81.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
74.2 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
72 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
68.2 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
68.1 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
 
51.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
47.4 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3844 (3257.93min - 3843.87max) MB/s +20%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3770 (3740.06min - 3770.26max) MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=199, last 2 years)
3539 MB/s +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3349 (938.07min - 3349.15max) MB/s +5%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2406 - 4093, n=10)
3233 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3202 (3129.61min - 3201.93max) MB/s
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3077 (2170.13min - 3076.66max) MB/s -4%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2519 MB/s -21%
seq write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5155 (4427.3min - 5155.43max) MB/s +104%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4485 (775.32min - 4484.81max) MB/s +78%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=199, last 2 years)
3829 MB/s +52%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3340 (3237.37min - 3340.31max) MB/s +32%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3291 (3216.4min - 3290.77max) MB/s +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3242 (1498min - 3241.78max) MB/s +28%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2235 - 3416, n=10)
2957 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
2526 (2498.97min - 2525.81max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
7121 (6367.95min - 7120.69max) MB/s +42%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
6935 (5510.15min - 6934.86max) MB/s +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6872 (4963.33min - 6872.25max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6555 (5758.8min - 6554.54max) MB/s +31%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
6460 (6020.84min - 6459.94max) MB/s +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=199, last 2 years)
6390 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
5008 (4421.01min - 5007.74max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3728 - 5023, n=10)
4865 MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
6761 (6735.84min - 6761.33max) MB/s +109%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4937 (4926.84min - 4936.71max) MB/s +53%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4926 (4833.5min - 4926max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=199, last 2 years)
4818 MB/s +49%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4803 (4344.79min - 4802.73max) MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4244 (427.59min - 4244.22max) MB/s +31%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (2957 - 3429, n=10)
3236 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3230 (3169.22min - 3230.03max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
85.3 (84.45min - 85.25max) MB/s +61%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
83.7 (81.88min - 83.66max) MB/s +58%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.9 (64.79min - 67.93max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=199, last 2 years)
67.9 MB/s +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
66.9 (50.9min - 66.86max) MB/s +26%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (47.2 - 64.7, n=10)
57.1 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
56.5 (49.8min - 56.49max) MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
52.9 (51.15min - 52.91max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
313 (306.34min - 313.21max) MB/s +144%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
267 (266.37min - 267.43max) MB/s +108%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
253 (250.9min - 252.85max) MB/s +97%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=199, last 2 years)
224 MB/s +74%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
220 (56.84min - 219.56max) MB/s +71%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (118.5 - 259, n=10)
178.5 MB/s +39%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
141 (138.88min - 140.96max) MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
128.4 (126.56min - 128.36max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4358 (4325.31min - 4358.41max) MB/s +622%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3523 (3416.03min - 3522.69max) MB/s +483%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3111 (2388.54min - 3111.42max) MB/s +415%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3013 (755.04min - 3013.06max) MB/s +399%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=199, last 2 years)
2590 MB/s +329%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (604 - 1533, n=10)
1061 MB/s +76%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
996 (952.75min - 996.41max) MB/s +65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
604 (565.74min - 603.6max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3597 (3488.54min - 3597.4max) MB/s +795%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3090 (3060.74min - 3090.41max) MB/s +669%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2736 (1172min - 2736.15max) MB/s +581%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=199, last 2 years)
2152 MB/s +435%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1282 (960.6min - 1281.78max) MB/s +219%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (305 - 2783, n=10)
1060 MB/s +164%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
457 (451.8min - 456.79max) MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
402 (389.17min - 402.07max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
9172 Points +180%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
7774 Points +138%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7311 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6843 Points +109%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5792 Points +77%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5636 Points +72%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3272 - 5610, n=9)
4237 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3272 Points
Score Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3369 Points +230%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3308 Points +224%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2959 Points +190%
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2508 Points +146%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1805 Points +77%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1496 Points +47%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (961 - 1761, n=9)
1343 Points +32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1020 Points
Score Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
4082 Points +126%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3631 Points +101%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
3331 Points +84%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3120 Points +73%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3012 Points +67%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2428 Points +34%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1792 - 3010, n=9)
2279 Points +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1808 Points
Seq Read
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5144.76 MB/s +40%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5128 MB/s +40%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
5126 MB/s +40%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5048 MB/s +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4963 MB/s +36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4582 MB/s +25%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (3074 - 4308, n=9)
3821 MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
3662 MB/s
Seq Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
5101 MB/s +166%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
4546 MB/s +137%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)
3673 MB/s +91%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3058.47 MB/s +59%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2623 MB/s +37%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2310 MB/s +20%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1536 - 3059, n=9)
2199 MB/s +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1921 MB/s
4K Read
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76 MB/s +80%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
75.8 MB/s +80%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
67.7 MB/s +60%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)
66.9 MB/s +59%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
61.3 MB/s +45%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (41.5 - 61.3, n=9)
51.1 MB/s +21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
49.65 MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
42.2 MB/s
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
288 MB/s +82%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
231 MB/s +46%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (117 - 512, n=9)
219 MB/s +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)
211 MB/s +34%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
207 MB/s +31%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
193 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
157.9 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
144.8 MB/s -8%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
2780 MB/s +354%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2744.3 MB/s +348%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2378 MB/s +289%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)
1939 MB/s +217%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1285 MB/s +110%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
915 MB/s +50%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (605 - 1272, n=9)
909 MB/s +49%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
612 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
3341 MB/s +129%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3176 MB/s +118%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
2669 MB/s +83%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)
2544 MB/s +74%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2493 MB/s +71%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1944.47 MB/s +33%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (1381 - 2500, n=9)
1872 MB/s +28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
1458 MB/s
Access Time Read
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.032 - 0.121, n=9)
0.07144 ms * -123%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)
0.05343 ms * -67%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.041 ms * -28%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.032 ms *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.028 ms * +12%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.027 ms * +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +34%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.018 ms * +44%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.082 ms * -257%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)
0.04639 ms * -102%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
  (0.016 - 0.073, n=9)
0.03289 ms * -43%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
0.023 ms *
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +9%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
0.02 ms * +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
0.017 ms * +26%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

02505007501000125015001750200022502500275030003250350037504000425045004750Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4947 (4458.34-4961.59)

Graphics card

GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop
GPU-Z Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop

The GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop has 8 GB RAM and in performance mode, it runs at a maximum of 80 watts. In order to access its full performance of up to 105 watts, you have to select turbo mode. The Zephyrus G16 features a MUX switch with Advanced Optimus, so switching to the dGPU doesn't require you to restart the system. The new Meteor-Lake processors' Arc iGPU shows considerably improved performance compared to the old Iris Xe Graphics G7, but since the G16 has a dedicated Nvidia GPU, this isn't all too important.

Its benchmark results were okay and you could achieve a bit better performance using turbo mode (this would also close the gap to the comparison devices). Under permanent load, the GPU is only allowed to consume 42 watts, which is why the GPU performance ends up being 27 % lower. Further GPU benchmarks can be found here.

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
56565 Points +52%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
41480 Points +11%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
41302 Points +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
40870 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years)
40513 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (24229 - 46434, n=50)
40358 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
37313 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
35299 Points -5%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
40570 Points +53%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
30051 Points +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
29801 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)
29469 Points +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (16212 - 33451, n=49)
29225 Points +10%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
28885 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
26568 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
25562 Points -4%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
18441 Points +68%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=235, last 2 years)
12072 Points +10%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11955 Points +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
11798 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (6241 - 13391, n=49)
11762 Points +7%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
11496 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
10989 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
9913 Points -10%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
31268 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1891 - 44487, n=32, last 2 years)
22325 Points
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
21612 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17684 - 24275, n=8)
21519 Points
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
19185 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
173311 Points +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 226512, n=234, last 2 years)
121576 Points +7%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
118031 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
113949 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (17391 - 129366, n=48)
112623 Points -1%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
112071 Points -2%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
108736 Points -5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
100573 Points -12%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
91362 Points -20%
Geekbench 6.2 - GPU OpenCL
Average of class Gaming
  (4321 - 207373, n=76, last 2 years)
118162 Points +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (101474 - 129836, n=25)
116444 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
107953 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
91413 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
87488 Points -19%
3DMark 11 Performance
31273 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23302 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10850 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
25 Seconds * -14%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
24 Seconds * -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 142, n=182, last 2 years)
23.1 Seconds * -5%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
23 Seconds * -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
22 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (18 - 28, n=48)
21.5 Seconds * +2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
21 Seconds * +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
15 Seconds * +32%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
44 Seconds * -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 172, n=52)
43.5 Seconds * -28%
Average of class Gaming
  (16 - 175, n=189, last 2 years)
40.2 Seconds * -18%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
36 Seconds * -6%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
35 Seconds * -3%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
34 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
34 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
22 Seconds * +35%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
393 Seconds * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
330 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (138 - 962, n=201, last 2 years)
314 Seconds * +5%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13705H
307 Seconds * +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H
304 Seconds * +8%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-13700H
299 Seconds * +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 428, n=48)
287 Seconds * +13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX
207 Seconds * +37%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
194 Seconds * +41%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core
32 Seconds *

* ... smaller is better

Gaming performance

Even though the new ROG Zephyrus G16 is no longer a hardcore gaming laptop, its gaming performance naturally remains a very important aspect—and the new model certainly didn't disappoint. The RTX 4070 Laptop's performance, together with that of the Meteor-Lake processor, is more than enough to run current games smoothly. In combination with the great OLED panel, this laptop offers an extraordinary gaming experience. Only extremely demanding games or ray tracing might require the use of upscaling technologies, if these are supported by the game. In addition, its gaming performance remains completely stable even during longer sessions.

Performance Rating - Percent
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
100 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.7 pt
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
74.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
71 pt
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
68.7 pt
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
65 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
59.5 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps +79%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119 fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps +18%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.4 (100min, 100P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.8 (87min, 88P1) fps -8%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
140.7 (3.02min, 100P1) fps +42%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
123.2 (3.96min, 76.9P1) fps +25%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119.7 (4.54min, 76.9P1) fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=220, last 2 years)
107.7 fps +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
107.4 (4.68min, 66.7P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.8 (3.78min, 58.8P1) fps
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
96.5 (4.91min, 66.7P1) fps -2%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
157.8 fps +57%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116.2 fps +15%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=230, last 2 years)
111.6 fps +11%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
100.8 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
95.7 fps -5%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
323 (61.7min, 222P1) fps +150%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=228, last 2 years)
207 fps +60%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
204 (39min, 153.9P1) fps +58%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
200 (31.2min, 147.4P1) fps +55%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
196.7 (34.8min, 146.3P1) fps +52%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
184.1 (24min, 133P1) fps +42%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
129.3 (30.4min, 84.7P1) fps
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
194.7 (160min) fps +48%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
154.7 (131.1min) fps +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
144.5 (123.6min) fps +10%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
143.8 (126.1min) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=240, last 2 years)
143.1 fps +9%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
142.3 (118.3min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
131.6 (114.5min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
137 fps +69%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115.3 fps +42%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
110.2 fps +36%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
109.7 fps +35%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=245, last 2 years)
102.2 fps +26%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
98.3 fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
81.2 fps
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
176.8 (159min) fps +79%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
119 fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)
117.2 fps +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
116 (48.5P0.1, 82.5P1) fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (69.8 - 133.7, n=51)
111.5 fps +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
105.4 (100min, 100P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
98.6 (94min, 94P1) fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
90.8 (87min, 88P1) fps -8%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
69 fps -30%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
149 fps +33%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
143 (112min) fps +28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (92 - 158, n=28)
129.4 fps +16%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
127 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=126, last 2 years)
126.3 fps +13%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
120 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
112 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
50 fps -55%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
115 fps +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 194, n=94, last 2 years)
114 fps +21%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
113 (102min) fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (79 - 128, n=26)
109.2 fps +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
108 fps +15%
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
97 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
49 fps -48%
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (6.76 - 144.7, n=44, last 2 years)
90.8 fps +32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64.3 - 90.7, n=17)
82.1 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
69 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
42.8 fps -38%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset (FSR off)
Average of class Gaming
  (32.9 - 103.9, n=37, last 2 years)
67.3 fps +54%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39.6 - 57.1, n=17)
50.8 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
43.7 fps
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
37.4 fps -14%
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023
1920x1080 Extreme Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (41 - 205, n=12, last 2 years)
119.2 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (94 - 114, n=4)
105 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
94 fps
2560x1440 Extreme Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (56 - 162, n=10, last 2 years)
103.4 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (64 - 82, n=4)
74 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
64 fps
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 103, n=13, last 2 years)
66.2 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (49 - 62, n=5)
54.4 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
49 fps
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (29.8 - 70, n=10, last 2 years)
52.9 fps +65%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (32 - 42, n=5)
37.2 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
32 fps
Star Wars Jedi Survivor
1920x1080 Epic Preset
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
71.1 (11min, 24.9P0.1, 36.9P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (61.5 - 80.1, n=8)
71.1 fps +16%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
67 fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.2 - 117.4, n=22, last 2 years)
63.8 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
61.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
60 fps -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
51 fps -17%
2560x1440 Epic Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 88.4, n=16, last 2 years)
48.4 fps +23%
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
47 (17min, 23.7P0.1, 31.8P1) fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
  (39.5 - 51.1, n=8)
45.4 fps +15%
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
44 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
39.5 fps
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
38 fps -4%

We also noted the impact the different energy modes have on several games with QHD resolution and maximum details. As you can see, there are some differences, but they are by no means huge. Even in quiet mode, you can usually still run them quite well (especially if you lower the resolution slightly or use DLSS)—in practice, you should just try out lots of different settings.

Gaming-Performance QHD@ Ultra-Settings
Energy profile Far Cry 5 Witcher 3 Cyberpunk 2077 Modern Warfare 3 Avatar Star Wars Jedi Survivor
Quiet 87 fps 68.5 fps 32.6 fps 49 fps 23 fps 29.8 fps
Performance 94 fps 82.4 fps 43.7 fps 64 fps 32 fps 39.5 fps
Turbo 105 fps 83.9 fps 48.7 fps 66 fps 34 fps 42.5 fps

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU: Ø98.6 (94-104)
CPU/GPU data Witcher 3 (1080p, Ultra settings)
CPU/GPU data Witcher 3 (1080p, Ultra settings)
low med. high ultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 166.5 98.8 79.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 221 98.6 82.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 162.3 146.8 140.7 131.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 131.8 100.8 76.3
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 119.9 106.3 81.2
Far Cry 5 (2018) 147 126 121 112 94
Strange Brigade (2018) 211 129.3 123.4
F1 2021 (2021) 294 270 220 123.1 95.2
F1 22 (2022) 192.9 199.7 168.1 65.6 44.3
Star Wars Jedi Survivor (2023) 78.7 69.9 65.1 61.5 39.5
F1 23 (2023) 195.2 193.8 165.4 55.8 36
Cyberpunk 2077 2.0 Phantom Liberty (2023) 96.4 90 77 69 43.7
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023) 143 130 101 94 64
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023) 81 75 66 49 32

Emissions - The ROG G16 with a third fan

Noise emissions

Three fans and lots of heat pipes
Three fans and lots of heat pipes

As previously mentioned, the models with the RTX 4050/4060/4070 Laptop use a conventional heat pipe cooling unit with a third case fan. This fan sucks in fresh air via the bottom and directs it toward the GPU. The problem is, however, that this small fan runs very fast with a high rotation speed, which leads to it being pretty noticeable. In general, the new Zephyrus G16 is by no means a silent laptop—even during everyday tasks—as the fans spring into action very quickly. This is even the case when using quiet mode. Under load, it very quickly hits about 46 dB(A) with performance mode in use, which is clearly audible but still tolerable. In turn, from around 48 dB(A), the fans' noise emissions get quite uncomfortable as there is an additional humming noise present, resulting in us not being able to recommend using turbo mode (max. 52.4 dB(A)). The following table shows a summary of the noise emissions using the different energy profiles. We didn't note any additional electronic noises coming from our test device. These test results are not representative of the models with the RTX 4080/4090 Laptop which use two fans including a Vapor Chamber. We will try to test one of these models as soon as possible.

Energy profile 3DMark 06 Witcher 3 Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty Stress test
Quiet 30.4 dB(A) 38 dB(A) 41.5 dB(A) 41.5 dB(A)
Performance 34.2 dB(A) 46.4 dB(A) 46.4 dB(A) 46.4 dB(A)
Turbo 41.5 dB(A) 52.4 dB(A) 52.4 dB(A) 52.4 dB(A)

Noise Level

Idle
23.9 / 27.8 / 30.1 dB(A)
Load
34.2 / 46.4 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23.9 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203838.138.236.436.535.845.436.140.42533.233.931.428.428.228.231.22640.53133.434.932.728.330.630.536.929.436.6403334.93632.133.432.642.936.635.75030.230.630.730.634.329.633.132.628.26326.830.228.827.731.826.529.626.727.48023.530.423.425.226.222.726.323.824.610024.726.624.924.323.422.62822.423.612523.829.924.820.923.221.130.72122.316020.826.323.820.721.418.922.518.920.620021.92724.521.521.719.72218.222.325024.53227.122.622.422.226.222.925.531524.429.125.823.320.219.921.717.22540025.130.126.622.519.218.218.913.722.750024.630.426.621.218.217.416.511.922.463024.730.126.820.917.416.21511.42280027.235.330.623.818.917.615.610.324.5100029.337.732.725.920.719.116.710.325.1125028.336.932.525.120.719.616.19.624.6160027.636.431.924.619.71915.79.524.4200028.537.332.323.92018.915.41024.1250027.136.831.82320.217.514.210.423.2315023.932.727.420.316.315.412.410.720.4400024.732.627.818.616.114.81311.218.8500023.432.124.916.41513.812.311.516.463002229.322.715.713.613.612.311.715.2800018.725.720.313.712.613.212.211.713.81000016.62215.112.912.21312.111.813.21250017.217.313.613.112.213.21211.713.71600015.113.712.212.111.712.411.411.212.5SPL3846.441.534.230.429.227.823.934.3N2.85.33.61.91.31.110.61.9median 24.5median 30.1median 26.6median 21.2median 19.2median 17.6median 15.6median 11.7median 22.3Delta2.23.72.83.832.74.72.74.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Ultra 7 155H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-13705H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700H, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple SSD AP8192Z
Noise
-5%
2%
-11%
-12%
4%
5%
off / environment *
23.9
24.7
-3%
23
4%
23
4%
25.9
-8%
24
-0%
23.7
1%
Idle Minimum *
23.9
24.7
-3%
23
4%
23
4%
25.9
-8%
24
-0%
23.7
1%
Idle Average *
27.8
26.2
6%
23
17%
23
17%
25.9
7%
24
14%
23.7
15%
Idle Maximum *
30.1
26.2
13%
23.6
22%
33.64
-12%
32
-6%
24
20%
23.7
21%
Load Average *
34.2
39.7
-16%
39
-14%
51.49
-51%
47.2
-38%
34.81
-2%
40.8
-19%
Witcher 3 ultra *
46.4
53.2
-15%
51.6
-11%
55.27
-19%
53.1
-14%
44.05
5%
42.8
8%
Load Maximum *
46.4
53.2
-15%
51.3
-11%
55.24
-19%
53.1
-14%
51.57
-11%
42.8
8%

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

Despite its thin case, the Zephyrus G16's temperature results are good. During simple tasks, the device barely gets warm. Under load, we measured up to 50 °C on the top of the base unit, but only in the area above the keyboard. The keyboard itself remains a lot cooler and poses no limitations when operating the laptop. On the bottom, we measured temperatures between ~45-48 °C, so you shouldn't place it onto your thighs in this case.

During the stress test, the CPU balanced out at 30 watts and the GPU at 65 watts, which is exactly what is stated by Asus when it comes to the profile performance. In quiet mode, we noted 30/45 watts and in turbo mode, we measured 35+85 watts.

CPU/GPU data stress test
CPU/GPU data stress test
Max. Load
 46.1 °C
115 F
50.3 °C
123 F
48 °C
118 F
 
 35.1 °C
95 F
41 °C
106 F
37.7 °C
100 F
 
 29.3 °C
85 F
29.6 °C
85 F
32.4 °C
90 F
 
Maximum: 50.3 °C = 123 F
Average: 38.8 °C = 102 F
46.9 °C
116 F
48 °C
118 F
44.3 °C
112 F
43.1 °C
110 F
44.1 °C
111 F
35.6 °C
96 F
31.9 °C
89 F
31.4 °C
89 F
27.7 °C
82 F
Maximum: 48 °C = 118 F
Average: 39.2 °C = 103 F
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C = 108 F | Room Temperature 20.5 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 50.3 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.4 °C / 90.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-3.5 °C / -6.3 F).
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (top)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Surface temperatures stress test (bottom)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
Intel Core i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
Intel Core i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
Heat
7%
6%
16%
3%
-27%
18%
Maximum Upper Side *
50.3
41.6
17%
40
20%
41
18%
46.7
7%
60
-19%
42.3
16%
Maximum Bottom *
48
50
-4%
37.6
22%
47
2%
54.1
-13%
61
-27%
42
12%
Idle Upper Side *
28.8
26.8
7%
32.4
-13%
23
20%
26.5
8%
38.2
-33%
22.5
22%
Idle Bottom *
29.8
27.9
6%
31.4
-5%
23
23%
26.8
10%
37.7
-27%
22.9
23%

* ... smaller is better

Speakers

One of the speakers
One of the speakers

Asus has installed a sound system with 6 modules (4x woofers at 2 watts each + 2x tweeters at 2 watts each) into the ROG Zephyrus G16. The results are great and about on the same level as the MacBook Pro 16 which is currently still the one to beat. Multimedia competitors such as the excellent Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16 can also be beaten by Asus when it comes to this. The sound is very powerful and spatial, and the modules can get very loud without distorting too much. This means that even using performance mode, you can easily still play sound through the speakers. All-in-all, an outstanding performance.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.143.6252639.83129.441.44036.6475032.638.46326.743.38023.85010022.461.61252166.116018.963.620018.269.325022.972.731517.27240013.772.750011.971.263011.472.780010.372.5100010.37112509.674.116009.575.420001074250010.469.4315010.769.6400011.266.5500011.566.4630011.765.5800011.768.41000011.865.11250011.7621600011.259.7SPL23.983.3N0.661.9median 11.7median 69.4Delta2.73.741.340.333.230.929.926.233.133.127.629.125.731.821.440.42052.318.559.616.660.119.265.122.267.115.96913.765.512.662.311.568.51171.71167.511.466.310.966.611.672.511.771.512.170.712.364.912.564.912.864.712.961.712.961.412.76412.360.924.780.50.650.9median 12.6median 65.12.43.537.937.731.732.529.633.128.933.425.533.125.845.5205519.360.319.765.617.56617.172.417.374.613.675.111.572.710.472.29.872.59.674.59.772.59.874.310.570.910.873.711.174.811.7721270.312.268.612.469.112.569.812.668.312.468.712.169.623.784.30.567.8median 12.1median 722.62.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605MLenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power management - A 90-Wh battery leads to decent runtimes

Power consumption

The laptop's power consumption measurements are less of a surprise, although the test device benefitted massively from its dark standard wallpaper during the idle measurements in particular. As is typical for OLED displays, consumption varies depending on which content is depicted, with light images using up more power. While gaming, we noted 120 watts and during the stress test, it hit 170 watts for a short period of time—this then balanced out quickly at 165 watts. As a result, we can safely say that the 200-watt power supply is more than powerful enough; configurations with the RTX 4080/4090 Laptop come delivered with a more powerful 240-watt power supply.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.79 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 8.3 / 12.5 / 12.8 Watt
Load midlight 71.3 / 169.1 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16.00
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, OLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP8192Z, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.00
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
-41%
-113%
-31%
-5%
-32%
-5%
-48%
-67%
Idle Minimum *
8.3
10.9
-31%
15.2
-83%
11.8
-42%
8.6
-4%
11
-33%
5.2
37%
12.1 ?(4.3 - 26.7, n=41)
-46%
Idle Average *
12.5
22.6
-81%
22.8
-82%
16.1
-29%
12
4%
18
-44%
16.9
-35%
16.9 ?(4.6 - 34.1, n=41)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
12.8
23.5
-84%
49.8
-289%
17
-33%
12.4
3%
19
-48%
17.2
-34%
24.1 ?(9 - 55.4, n=41)
-88%
Load Average *
71.3
84.6
-19%
121.2
-70%
100.6
-41%
80
-12%
91
-28%
90.5
-27%
Witcher 3 ultra *
127.5
159.5
-25%
242
-90%
158
-24%
147.7
-16%
130
-2%
109
15%
Load Maximum *
169.1
177.3
-5%
273.7
-62%
192
-14%
173.1
-2%
228
-35%
145.2
14%
220 ?(107 - 319, n=40)
-30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø127.5 (122.2-135.3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø137.3 (125.1-169.1)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø12.2 (8.44-15.9)

Power consumption with external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø96.1 (82.4-109.4)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø99.2 (60.9-104)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø41.2 (35.5-76.8)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø104.1 (102.5-117.2)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø116.4 (111.4-126.3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø122 (118.4-124.8)
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø19.6 (16.8-24.5)

Runtimes

The Asus laptop is equipped with a large 90-Wh battery and its runtimes are excellent in total compared to the Windows comparison devices—only the MacBook Pro 16 came far ahead. Within the Armoury Crate software, it is set that the refresh rate is reduced to 60 Hz in battery mode, which is why we are using these values for the comparison (we will add the values at 240 Hz shortly). During the WLAN test—which often isn't optimal for OLED panels due to lots of bright websites—we noted runtimes of 07:15 hours at 150 cd/m² (57 % of its maximum brightness) and 05:45 hours at full brightness. During the video test at 150 cd/m², its results of just over 11 hours were a lot better. It seems that the new Arc iGPU (or its video decoder) runs very efficiently in this aspect, as the other Meteor-Lake test devices' good runtimes also thoroughly stand out in the video test (for example the Zenbook 14 OLED or the Spectre x360 14—reviews coming soon). If you play an HDR video at maximum brightness, its runtimes are about 7.5 hours, but this is naturally also to do with its limited HDR brightness. One full charge takes 112 minutes with the device switched on, whereby 60 % of its capacity is available after about 35 minutes and 80 % is available after 50 minutes.

February 5, 2024 update: Enabling the 240 Hz mode leads to battery life figures shrinking noticeably. Surfing the Web at a brightness level of around 150 cd/m² drained the battery in 6 hours and 21 minutes. This is about an hour less than the result obtained at 60 Hz. At full brightness, 5 hours and 45 minutes are no longer obtainable. One will have to be content with 5 hours instead.

Battery information
Battery information
Charging curve
Charging curve
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 15min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
11h 11min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 11min
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M
Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Lenovo Yoga Pro 9 16-IRP G8
i7-13705H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 75 Wh
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023
i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF
i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh
SCHENKER VISION 16 Pro (M23)
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
MSI Stealth 16 Studio A13VG
i7-13700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Max
Apple M3 Max 16-Core, M3 Max 40-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-27%
-1%
15%
-5%
25%
71%
-12%
H.264
671
449
-33%
442
-34%
470
-30%
462
-31%
1221
82%
WiFi v1.3
435
385
-11%
365
-16%
448
3%
467
7%
466
7%
999
130%
Load
71
44
-38%
81
14%
126
77%
77
8%
142
100%
71
0%

Pros

+ very high-quality and compact aluminum case
+ great OLED screen with 240-Hz refresh rate and G-Sync
+ excellent speakers
+ great input devices
+ 2x SSD slots
+ good system performance

Cons

- annoying 3rd fan, Vapor-Chamber only from RTX 4080 upwards
- RAM soldered on, small configurations only come with 16 GB
- limited maximum HDR brightness
- no Wi-Fi 7

Verdict - The new ROG Zephyrus G16 is an outstanding gaming/multimedia hybrid

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 review. Test device provided by Asus Germany.
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 review. Test device provided by Asus Germany.

Asus has tweaked its concept surrounding the new ROG Zephyrus G16, now aiming to attract a wider audience. In our eyes, this has been a success on the manufacturer's side, as its new 2024 model is an extremely high-quality, compact and lightweight 16-inch laptop with an aluminum case, impressive speakers, great input devices and a wonderful OLED panel. The latter can't quite live up to the competition when it comes to its HDR capabilities, as its maximum brightness is limited. Even so, films and games look great on the 240-Hz OLED screen and gamers will be pleased with its quick response times and G-Sync support. Furthermore, Asus remains one of the only manufacturers to offer a software solution that dims the display without reaching potentially harmful PWM areas.  

Its components' performance is good, too, although the new Meteor-Lake processor doesn't really offer any increased performance compared to its old Raptor-Lake counterpart—plus, its single-core performance is actually even worse. The new mobile processors' actual strength—the new Arc iGPU—doesn't bring much to the table in this case, as a dedicated Nvidia GPU is installed into the device. 

A high-quality and lightweight aluminum case, great OLED display and excellent speakers: Thanks to its powerful hardware, the new ROG Zephyrus G16 can of course still depict current games, but Asus' 2024 model edges more in the direction of high-end multimedia. So, even if you have no gaming ambitions whatsoever, it's still worth taking a look at the new Zephyrus G16.

Our biggest issue lies in the laptop's cooling, as the G16 only remains truly silent in the rarest of cases, plus, its additional system fan unfortunately has a very high rotation speed. It is also a shame that only the two versions with the RTX 4080/4090 Laptop benefit from more powerful Vapor-Chamber cooling, which leads to a completely different fan behavior and the CPU being able to profit from higher power limits. The device's soldered-on RAM is another disadvantage—especially when you consider that our test sample only has 16 GB installed. For a starting price of almost US$3,000, Asus should really install 32 GB RAM as standard.

The new ROG Zephyrus G16's biggest competitor is surely the Razer Blade 16 and our review of the new 2024 variant (which also features a Samsung OLED) will be published soon. When it comes to multimedia devices, the Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i 16 or the Apple MacBook Pro 16 are its biggest rivals, although, these devices only offer limited gaming capabilities.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Price and availability

The new ROG Zephyrus G16 is available from 02/15/2024 and individual configurations are already listed. Prices start from US$2,899.99.

Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M - 02/04/2024 v7
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
91 / 98 → 93%
Keyboard
92%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
70 / 80 → 88%
Weight
65 / 10-66 → 99%
Battery
82 / 95 → 86%
Display
92%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
95%
Temperature
85 / 95 → 89%
Noise
76 / 90 → 84%
Audio
96%
Camera
44 / 85 → 52%
Average
84%
92%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Read all 74 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 review - The gaming laptop now with G-Sync OLED and Intel Meteor Lake
Andreas Osthoff, 2024-02- 6 (Update: 2024-02-21)