Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 laptop review - A slim gamer with an RTX 4090 and unfulfilled potential
The ROG Zephyrus G16 is currently the shooting star when it comes to thin Asus gaming laptops. A few months ago, we reviewed the variant with the Core Ultra 7 155H and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4070. Now we are looking at the high-end model with the Core Ultra 9 185H and the GeForce RTX 4090 laptop. In addition to the more powerful components, we are dealing with different cooling. Although the configurations up to the RTX 4070 laptop use a conventional cooling unit consisting of three fans and heat pipes, the high-end models (RTX 4080/4090 laptop) use vapor chamber cooling. Of course, we want to know how the new cooling affects both the performance and emissions.
Our review device possesses the number GU605MY, costs $3,649 and, in addition to the Core Ultra 9 185H and the GeForce RTX 4090 laptop, it also comes with 32 GB of RAM and the already familiar 240 Hz OLED screen. In this review, we will pay particular attention to the differences between the RTX 4070 laptop configuration and the performance as well as the high-end variant’s emissions. All the additional information regarding the case, input devices, display and speakers can be found in our review of the ROG Zephyrus G16 with the RTX 4070 laptop.
Asus will soon be launching an update with AMD’s new Strix Point processors (Zen5), however, these models will only be equipped with the GeForce RTX 4070 laptop.
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.1 % | v8 | 07/2024 | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 16.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.5 % | v8 | 06/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.6 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
83.9 % | v8 | 06/2024 | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.7 mm | 16.00" | 3200x2000 | |
88.4 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Alienware x16 R2 P120F Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 2.7 kg | 18.57 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.1 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Note: We have recently updated our rating system and the results of version 8 are not comparable with the results of version 7. More information is available here .
Differences to the G16 with the RTX 4070 laptop
The high-end model of the ROG Zephyrus G16 is visually indistinguishable from the weaker model equipped with the RTX 4070/4060 laptop. However, internally the cooling system differences become apparent. While the weaker models use a total of three fans and regular heat pipes, Asus has gone for vapor chamber cooling with two fans for its more expensive models.
The cooling increases the weight from 1.817 kg to 1.908 kg which is still light compared to the other RTX 4090 laptops in the 16-inch segment since the comparison devices are at least half a kilo heavier. On top of that, the Zephyrus is also simultaneously one of the thinnest and most compact models. Configurations up to the RTX 4070 laptop come with a 200-watt PSU (583 grams) and from the RTX 4080 laptop onwards it's a more powerful 240-watt one (745 grams).
Performance - Meteor Lake and RTX 4090 laptop
The high-end variant of the Zephyrus is currently equipped with the fastest Meteor Lake processor, the Core Ultra 9 185H. When it comes to the CPU performance, it lags behind Intel's HX CPUs. In the 115-watt version found here, the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090 laptop is quite a bit away from reaching maximum performance. The installed RAM sits at 32 GB (LPDDR5x 7467) but, due to the price and lack of upgradeability, we would have preferred 64 GB.
Test conditions
The basic energy profiles remain identical and the more powerful model with the RTX 4090 laptop also offers the profiles Quiet, Performance and Turbo. In the following table, we have listed their corresponding TDP/TGP values as well as the effect on the performance. Below this, we have also added the values from the RTX 4070 model of the Zephyrus G16 so you can see a direct comparison. In principle, the models with the more powerful vapor chamber cooling are allowed to consume a little more power but the difference is fairly small, especially when it comes to the processor. In both the Quiet and Performance profiles, the vapor chamber cooling even manages to get somewhat louder than the weaker RTX 4070 variant. As standard, we carried out the benchmarks and measurements using the turbo mode which is, however, only available when connected to the mains.
Energy profile | CPU load | CB R23 Multi | GPU load | Time Spy Graphics | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra | max. fan volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quiet | 60 watts | 15,750 points | 55 watts | 9,731 points | 40.2fps | 41.4 dB(A) |
Performance | 100->70 Watt | 17,452 points | 90 watts | 15,205 points | 60.2fps | 48.1 dB(A) |
Turbo | 110->80 watts | 19,109 points | 115 watts | 19,109 points | 68.1fps | 52.3 dB(A) |
Energy profile | CPU load | CB R23 Multi | GPU load | Time Spy Graphics | Cyberpunk 2077 QHD Ultra | max. fan volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quiet | 60->45 watts | 15,869 points | 65 watta | 9,042 points | 32.6fps | 41.5 dB(A) |
Performance | 70->50 watts | 17,133 points | 80 watts | 10,989 points | 43.7fps | 46.4 dB(A) |
Turbo | 95->70 watts | 18,372 points | 105 watts | 12,312 points | 48.7fps | 52.4 dB(A) |
Processor - Intel Core Ultra 9 185H
The Core Ultra 9 185H is the fastest mobile processor from Intel's Meteor Lake generation, nevertheless, it finds itself ranked clearly behind the HX processors (Raptor Lake refresh). As we just observed in the comparison table, there are also no tangible differences between the Core Ultra 9 and the Core Ultra 7 in both models of the Zephyrus G16 2024 as well as the Alienware x16 R2. The latter also has the Core Ultra 9 185H.
However, the other RTX 4090 competitors with the Core i9 14900HX offer significantly higher CPU performance, especially in the multi-core tests. The ROG Zephyrus G16's multi-core performance doesn't always remain entirely stable, although a deficit of around 10 % under sustained load can be considered quite small. In battery mode, the processor is allowed to draw a maximum of 75 watts but this has hardly any effect on the multi-core performance (~8 %). Additional CPU benchmarks can be found here.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.2: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (12688 - 19851, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1166 - 1912, n=15) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4843 - 7651, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (442 - 735, n=15) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1582 - 3165, n=17) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (191.9 - 281, n=15) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (163 - 285, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51738 - 76331, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4199 - 5781, n=15) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 6.2 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9140 - 14540, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 6.2 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=105, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (1490 - 2573, n=15) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9330 - 14230, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (986 - 1902, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (14.1 - 22.7, n=15) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (34.5 - 62, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (0.4313 - 0.759, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (9220 - 18676, n=15) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (48865 - 96463, n=15) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (2394 - 4534, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (66785 - 95241, n=15) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (7255 - 11392, n=15) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (24004 - 48020, n=15) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (53116 - 154066, n=15) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (678 - 1341, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (4428 - 10078, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (44809 - 53918, n=15) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=198, last 2 years) |
System performance
Slightly less than surprising is that the high-end variant of the Zephyrus G16 is a very responsive laptop. Although the benchmark results are also good, once again, the HX processor-equipped competition performs better. However, this is not noticeable in everyday situations. Due to the Advanced Optimus graphics switching, there is an occasional short freeze when booting games when the system switches to the dGPU, however, that is completely normal.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=175, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=159, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=164, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=189, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7993 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (71360 - 95718, n=15) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=197, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (64619 - 87768, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=197, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (51114 - 93871, n=15) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=197, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 185H (129 - 259, n=15) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
In our standardized latency test (surfing the internet, 4K YouTube playback, CPU load), with the current BIOS, the review device displayed limitations when it came to using real-time audio applications. However, that was already the case with the RTX 4070 model.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605MY | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 2024 GU605M | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 |
* ... smaller is better
Mass storage
The Zephyrus G16 offers two, fast PCIe 4.0 slots for M.2 2280 SSDs meaning the storage capacity can be upgraded quickly and affordably. Our review device comes with a 2 TB, Samsung PM9A1a although 1.76 TB are available to the user after the first installation. In the synthetic tests, the SSD didn't quite meet our expectations but we are still dealing with a very fast storage drive with transfer speeds remaining perfectly consistent even under sustained load. Additional SSD benchmarks can be found here.
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card - GeForce RTX 4090 laptop
The Zephyrus G16 is available with the full range of current GeForce RTX laptop models (4050-4090), however, the thin design makes itself known in the fast variants. In the turbo mode, the GeForce RTX 4090 laptop only operates with a TGP of 95 watts + 20 watts of dynamic boost meaning it is quite a bit off the maximum configuration of 175 watts (150 TGP + 25 watts of dynamic boost). That is something potential buyers should know to avoid later disappointment. In the GPU benchmarks, we can clearly see the disadvantage compared to other RTX 4090 laptop models which are between 15-26 % faster. Even the RTX 4080 laptop found in the Alienware x16 R2 (175W) is a touch quicker than the RTX 4090 housed in the Zephyrus G16.
The advantage compared to the Zephyrus G16 with the RTX 4070 laptop sits at 50 % which is still, of course, huge - especially considering the compact case. Basically, the RTX 4070 laptop (and also the weaker versions) can better reach its potential when paired with the Zephyrus G16. Depending on the use case, a larger amount of video memory (16 GB) can be an additional advantage, for example, when editing videos.
Under sustained load, the GPU performance remains stable, however, in battery mode, the GPU is allowed to draw a maximum of 55 watts and this is why the GPU performance drops significantly here (-52 %). Additional GPU benchmarks can be found here.