AMD Radeon RX 7900M performance debut: Alienware m18 R1 laptop review
(November 28, 2023 update: Major display issues mentioned in this review can be addressed by installing the older display driver v31.0.14076.3, A01. Newer displays drivers were accidentally pushed and should be avoided for now. See our dedicated page here to learn more. Our original review is as follows.)
As the first 18-inch gaming laptop from Alienware in over a decade, Dell is going all-in on its Alienware M18 R1 series by offering Intel, AMD, and Nvidia options across the board to appeal to as many gamers as possible. Users can mix and match between Intel-Nvidia, AMD-Nvidia, or AMD-AMD when it comes to CPUs and GPUs which is very uncommon for a gaming laptop.
Our unit in review is the latest AMD-AMD configuration and one of the first available to offer the 180 W RNDA3 Radeon RX 7900M as an alternative to the reigning mobile GeForce RTX 4080. Perhaps most notably, the new AMD GPU undercuts the RTX 4090 configuration by $1200 USD with all other options held equal for a final price of $2300 USD as reviewed.
Alternatives to the Alienware m18 R1 include other high-end 18-inch gaming laptops like the Asus ROG Strix Scar 18, Razer Blade 18, or Acer Predator Helios 18. MSI does not yet offer any modern 18-inch gaming laptops at the moment.
More Dell reviews:
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2023 | Alienware m18 R1 AMD R9 7945HX, Radeon RX 7900M | 3.9 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.9 kg | 26.7 mm | 18.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.3 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3.2 kg | 29.15 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.4 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 21.9 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 30.8 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
v (old) | MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VI i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 17.30" | 2560x1600 |
Case
The Intel and AMD versions of the Alienware m18 R1 share the same chassis design and color options. Thus, the only quick and easy way to visually distinguish between the two models is to look for the Thunderbolt logos next to the USB-C ports along the rear. See our review on the Intel-Nvidia configuration to learn more about the physical features of the Alienware m18 R1.
USB4 is disappointingly not supported.
SD Card Reader
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m18 R1 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Alienware m18 R1 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 |
Communication
Webcam
Maintenance
The AMD-AMD configuration only supports up to three M.2 NVMe SSDs whereas the Intel-Nvidia configuration supports up to four as shown by the comparison images below. Their internal features are otherwise identical.
Accessories And Warranty
Dell has yet to transition to GaN AC adapters which can offer higher power-per-volume than traditional AC adapters. The included 330 W AC adapter is therefore very bulky when compared to the 330 W GaN AC adapters that currently ship with most Razer Blade laptops.
The standard one-year limited warranty applies if purchased in the US.
Display
Two FreeSync display options are available as follows:
- 1920 x 1200, 480 Hz, 100% DCI-P3, IPS
- 2560 x 1600, 165 Hz, 100% DCI-P3, IPS
Our configuration utilizes the bolded panel above much like on our previous Intel-Nvidia configuration. However, the panel provider is different this time around (BOE vs. Chi Mei) to suggest that Dell is sourcing 480 Hz panels from multiple vendors for its Alienware m18 series. There are thankfully no major differences between them in terms of color coverage, response times, or contrast for a very similar viewing experience.
The 480 Hz refresh rate is the fastest available on laptops as of this writing for extremely smooth motion with minimal ghosting. Nonetheless, the benefits of fast refresh rates become increasingly marginal the higher you go. It may therefore be worth considering the higher resolution 1600p option instead even if the refresh rate is slower as 165 Hz is still a silky smooth experience.
It's worth noting that the native 480 Hz refresh rate can be set to 240 Hz or 120 Hz via Windows, but not any lower. It's too bad that there is no 60 Hz option as high refresh rates impact power consumption as our Energy Management section below will show.
Strangely, the model comes calibrated against the sRGB spectrum out-of-the-box even though it supports full DCI-P3 colors. This would occur on our Intel-Nvidia configuration as well.
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 319.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 1278:1 (Black: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.22 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.47
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
Alienware m18 R1 AMD BOE NE18NZ1, IPS, 1920x1200, 18" | Alienware m18 R1 Chi Mei 180JME, IPS, 1920x1200, 18" | Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 AUO45A8 (B180QAN01.2), IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 AU Optronics B180QAN01.0, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W NE180QDM-NZ2, IPS, 2560x1600, 18" | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 1% | -2% | -2% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.5 | 97.7 -1% | 99.8 1% | 96.9 -2% | 97.2 -1% | 97.6 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.7 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 99.8 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 88.7 | 89.8 1% | 91.8 3% | 85.3 -4% | 84.9 -4% | 86.5 -2% |
Response Times | -5% | -128% | -17% | -42% | -9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.8 ? | 3 ? -7% | 7.6 ? -171% | 4.2 ? -50% | 5.41 ? -93% | 4.2 ? -50% |
Response Time Black / White * | 9.6 ? | 9.9 ? -3% | 17.8 ? -85% | 8 ? 17% | 8.62 ? 10% | 6.4 ? 33% |
PWM Frequency | 2509 | |||||
Screen | -18% | -131% | -99% | -215% | -145% | |
Brightness middle | 319.6 | 372.8 17% | 360 13% | 549.6 72% | 490 53% | 398.6 25% |
Brightness | 304 | 367 21% | 355 17% | 524 72% | 468 54% | 384 26% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 97 11% | 92 6% | 89 2% | 86 -1% | 89 2% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.32 -28% | 0.21 16% | 0.53 -112% | 0.54 -116% | 0.46 -84% |
Contrast | 1278 | 1165 -9% | 1714 34% | 1037 -19% | 907 -29% | 867 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.22 | 1.92 -57% | 3.82 -213% | 3.32 -172% | 4.97 -307% | 4.05 -232% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 3.65 -18% | 7.38 -138% | 6.63 -114% | 11.02 -255% | 8.68 -180% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.47 | 0.51 -9% | 2.24 -377% | 2.7 -474% | 2.97 -532% | 1.02 -117% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 1.5 -88% | 5.06 -533% | 2 -150% | 7.2 -800% | 6.5 -713% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.34 94% | 2.52 87% | 2.29 96% | 2.161 102% | 2.11 104% |
CCT | 6471 100% | 6607 98% | 5657 115% | 6319 103% | 6515 100% | 7518 86% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-12% | -86% /
-102% | -39% /
-67% | -86% /
-144% | -52% /
-95% |
* ... smaller is better
Average DeltaE values are well below 2 to suggest that end-user calibration will be not necessary for most users.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.9 ms rise | |
↘ 4.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.2 ms rise | |
↘ 1.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance
Testing Conditions
We set Alienware Command Center to Overdrive mode prior to running the benchmarks below. Familiarity with Command Center is vital for controlling specific features of the laptop including RGB lighting, power profiles, and game-specific profiles.
It's also recommended to download AMD Adrenalin to get the latest GPU drivers and for toggling on/off all the features of the GPU.
Processor
CPU performance is the classic AMD vs. Intel affair where our Ryzen 9 7945HX offers 5 to 10 percent faster raw multi-thread performance than the competing Core i9-13980HX while being 5 to 10 percent slower in single-thread performance. It's essentially on par with the recent Ryzen 9 7945HX3D to be one of the fastest mobile processors available. Downgrading to the Ryzen 9 7845HX or Ryzen 7 7745HX is expected to reduce processor performance by about 20 to 25 percent and 40 to 50 percent, respectively.
Performance sustainability is excellent as exemplified by the steady scores when running CineBench R15 xT in a loop.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (51004 - 60169, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (214250 - 252486, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (8525 - 10389, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (175140 - 200651, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (29064 - 32988, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (113499 - 134044, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (149040 - 325960, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (2039 - 2409, n=5) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (26952 - 31796, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (31421 - 40095, n=5) | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD |
System Performance
PCMark results are some of the highest of any gaming laptop to place our Alienware m18 on equal footing with some of the fastest Intel-Nvidia alternatives. Unfortunately, the user experience is less than stellar in practice due to all the bugs we observed. A few notable ones include:
- Main display would sometimes turn off for no reason and a reboot would be required
- Failure to boot if an external monitor is connected
- Failure to run 3DMark Speed Way and Blender Classroom HIP/AMD benchmarks
- Unusually high power consumption when on Standby mode
These issues would occur more than once even with the latest Windows updates and AMD drivers installed at the time of writing (31.0.22023.1014).
Memory performance is also noticeably slower than many Intel-based gaming laptops. This doesn't appear to be a fluke either as our Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 with the same Ryzen 9 CPU as our Alienware would also return similarly low numbers.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, AMD Radeon RX 7900M () |
PCMark 10 Score | 9852 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX (77.1 - 91.3, n=5) | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
Alienware m18 R1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
LatencyMon reveals slight DPC issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage which is not unusual. 4K video playback at 60 FPS could be better, however, as we're able to record 4 dropped frames within a 60-second window compared to 0 on the Blade 18.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The 1 TB Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 is a higher-end PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD similar to the Samsung PM9A1 series. Our drive would exhibit no throttling issues maintaining high transfer rates of ~6300 MB/s for extended periods.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 18 2023 G834JY-N6005W |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
AMD is marketing the Radeon RX 7900M as a direct competitor to the mobile GeForce RTX 4080 and we think that is a very fair comparison. 3DMark results are on par with the RTX 4080 in the Alienware m16 R1 if not just slightly faster in the DX11-based Fire Strike test. The raw performance jump over last year's Radeon RX 6850M XT is significant at around 40 to 60 percent. AMD had no real answer to the mobile RTX 4070, 4080, or 4090 prior to the launch of the Radeon RX 7900M.
RT acceleration has always been a weak point of the Radeon series, but this has improved substantially for the Radeon RX 7900M. Our Port Royal score is about 10 percent behind a mobile GeForce RTX 4080 to represent a 2x to 2.5x increase over last year's Radeon RX 6800M. Enabling RT was previously never recommended on a Radeon-powered laptop due to the immense performance loss, but the Radeon RX 7900M is the turning point AMD fans have been waiting for.
Running on Performance mode or Balanced mode instead of Overdrive mode decreases performance by just a few percentage points as shown by our Fire Strike results table below. The minor differences are noteworthy as the fan noise differences between these modes are significant as detailed in our System Noise section below.
Power Profile | Physics Score | Graphics Score | Combined Score |
Overdrive Mode | 39027 | 50241 | 16256 |
Performance Mode | 37979 (-3%) | 47187 (-6%) | 16523 (-0%) |
Balanced Mode | 37590 (-4%) | 48170 (-4%) | 16382 (-0%) |
Battery Power | 31494 (-19%) | 10735 (-79%) | 4174 (-74%) |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
Alienware m18 R1 AMD | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 7900M () | |
Alienware m18 R1 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Acer Predator Helios 18 N23Q2 |