Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS review: The AMD laptop with up to 20-hour runtimes
The Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition - a mid-range gaming laptop - relies on AMD hardware: A Ryzen-9-7940HS APU and Radeon-RX-7600S GPU power the device. Competitors include the Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8, the MSI Katana 15 B12VEK, the Medion Erazer Defender P40 and the Gigabyte G5 KE.
For more detailed information on the laptop's case, connectivity and input devices, take a look at our review of the A16's identically-built sister model.
possible competitors compared
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.9 % | 06/2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 22.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.9 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.9 % | 03/2023 | MSI Katana 15 B12VEK i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.6 % | 05/2023 | Medion Erazer Defender P40 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 33 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
81.8 % | 04/2023 | Gigabyte G5 KE i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 23.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case & connectivity - small changes compared to its sister model
Compared to its sister model's well-known black case, the A16 has a two-toned case. The back of the lid and bottom of the case are a sandy color ("Sandstorm"). Connectivity options are also a little different: One of the two USB-C ports has been upgraded to USB-4 standard.
Display - 16:10 panel with sRGB coverage
The A16 is equipped with the same 165-Hz panel that can be found on its sister model. Its matte 16-inch display (1,920 x 1,200 pixels, IPS) has a 16:10 format and it scores points thanks to its FreeSync support, lack of PWM flickering and quick reaction speeds. While its contrast is acceptable, its brightness could do with being a little better.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 301 cd/m²
Contrast: 1433:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
70.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.265
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Katana 15 B12VEK AUOAF90 (B156HAN08.4), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer Defender P40 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Gigabyte G5 KE Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 NE160WUM-NX2 (BOE0B33), IPS-Level, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | -44% | -0% | -39% | 0% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.3 | 71.2 3% | 38.1 -45% | 68.3 -1% | 40.7 -41% | 69.4 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.3 | 98.8 2% | 56.8 -42% | 98.1 1% | 61 -37% | 97.8 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.7 | 73.3 4% | 39.3 -44% | 69.8 -1% | 42.1 -40% | 70.9 0% |
Response Times | 2% | -159% | 10% | -79% | -5% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.6 ? | 14.5 ? 7% | 38.8 ? -149% | 14.6 ? 6% | 26.64 ? -71% | 17 ? -9% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 10.4 ? -4% | 26.8 ? -168% | 8.7 ? 13% | 18.65 ? -87% | 10.1 ? -1% |
PWM Frequency | ||||||
Screen | 5% | -115% | 7% | -113% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 301 | 405.7 35% | 261 -13% | 364 21% | 269 -11% | 308 2% |
Brightness | 294 | 368 25% | 258 -12% | 343 17% | 248 -16% | 293 0% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 87 -7% | 92 -2% | 86 -9% | 85 -10% | 90 -4% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.38 -81% | 0.19 10% | 0.28 -33% | 0.5 -138% | 0.23 -10% |
Contrast | 1433 | 1068 -25% | 1374 -4% | 1300 -9% | 538 -62% | 1339 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.79 | 1.65 8% | 5.57 -211% | 1.67 7% | 4.54 -154% | 1.47 18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.48 | 4.2 -21% | 20.6 -492% | 2.78 20% | 17.28 -397% | 2.98 14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 0.53 56% | 4.63 -286% | 1.14 5% | 3.34 -178% | 1.02 15% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 1.2 52% | 3.19 -28% | 1.4 44% | 3.8 -52% | 2.2 12% |
Gamma | 2.265 97% | 2.3 96% | 2.45 90% | 2.091 105% | 2.17 101% | 2.228 99% |
CCT | 6157 106% | 6453 101% | 6146 106% | 6568 99% | 7408 88% | 6228 104% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
4% | -106% /
-106% | 6% /
6% | -77% /
-92% | -0% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Ex works, the screen features good color depiction: A deviation of around 1.8 is acceptable (DeltaE < 3). Calibration lowers this rate to 1.2 and leads to more balanced gray tones. The panel can depict the entire sRGB color space, but not the AdobeRGB and DCI P3 spaces. This is similar to most of its competitors' displays.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.7 ms rise | |
↘ 4.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.3 ms rise | |
↘ 8.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The laptop's viewing-angle stable IPS panel remains legible from every angle. It is possible to view the panel outside - as long as the sun isn't shining too brightly.
Performance - Asus make use of AMD power
The Asus TUF Gaming A16 Advantage Edition FA617XS is a mid-range gaming laptop. AMD hardware delivers the necessary computing power. The present model can be purchased for around $1,700.
Testing conditions
You can switch between the three manufacturer-specific performance profiles (see table) via the key combination "Fn" + "F5". The profiles "Performance" (benchmarks) and "Quiet" (battery tests) were used. The GPU mode was set to "Standard" (= switching graphics). The notebook's control center ("Armoury Crate") allows you to create individual profiles ("Manual"), which includes setting the PPT and fan curves.
Turbo | Performance | Quiet | |
---|---|---|---|
Power Limit 1 (HWInfo) | 120 watts | 105 watts | 75 watts |
Power Limit 2 (HWInfo) | 144 watts | 114 watts | 90 watts |
Noise (Wichter 3) | 53 dB(A) | 51 dB(A) | 46 dB(A) |
Performance (Witcher 3) | ~100 fps | ~100 fps | ~94 fps |
Processor
The CPU part of the Ryzen-9-7940HS-APU (Phoenix, Zen 4) features eight processing cores with 16 threads. A base clock rate of 4 GHz can be raised to up to 5.25 GHz (one core). Our measured benchmark results are about the same as the previously tested 7940HS laptops. Using the profile "Turbo" leads to a little better performance (4-5 per cent).
The sister model's Ryzen-7-7735HS-APU (Rembrandt R, Zen 3+) is clearly beaten by the Ryzen 9, even with the same number of cores and the same power limits. Thanks to its better architecture and higher clock rates, its per-watt performance is greater.
The CB15 loop test shows: Continuous multi-thread load leads the CPU to work with consistently high turbo clock rates - regardless of the chosen performance profile.
Please note: Detailed information about the installed APU and its architecture can be read in our Zen4 analysis article.
Cinebench R15 multi continuous test
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Gigabyte G5 KE |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (25226 - 29109, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (106512 - 123214, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (4566 - 5119, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (118174 - 124783, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (14663 - 15551, n=8) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (56839 - 66238, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (86309 - 169946, n=8) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (866 - 1152, n=8) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (13175 - 15675, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=195, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK (v6.85.6300) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 (v6.75.6100) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (29922 - 41024, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS (v6.75.6100) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE (v6.75.6100) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 (v6.85.6300) |
System performance
The smoothly running system provides enough performance for demanding areas of use, such as rendering, video editing and gaming - the good PCMark results can confirm this. The RAM's transfer rates are on a normal level for DDR5 4800 RAM. It is important to note: The automated switch between dGPU and iGPU (Smart Access Graphic) always takes a second or two. During this time, the system freezes.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=174, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=173, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=158, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S () |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5937 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6458 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7927 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (59712 - 78739, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (50399 - 61836, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (72541 - 91567, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Gigabyte G5 KE |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS (87.6 - 111.1, n=8) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latency
The standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4k video playback, Prime95 high-load) revealed some anomalies. The system does not seem to be suitable for real-time video and audio editing. Future software updates could lead to improvements or even degradations.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Katana 15 B12VEK | |
Medion Erazer Defender P40 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Gigabyte G5 KE | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage devices
Asus has equipped the A16 with a 512 GB SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) from Micron - (too) little storage space for a gaming notebook. It delivers decent data rates but is not one of the top models among all the available SSDs. Especially the write rates are far below today's possibilities.