Dell G15 5530 Review: A viable Alienware alternative now with Raptor Lake-HX

The Dell G series is aimed at bringing Alienware prowess to those who prefer not to pay through the teeth for a capable gaming laptop. Back during MWC 2023, Dell introduced the refreshed G15 and G16 series with Intel Raptor Lake-HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 40 series GPU options.
We now have with us the Dell G15 5530 with a top-end configuration featuring the Intel Core i7-13650HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 16 GB DDR5-4800 RAM, 512 GB NVMe SSD, and a 15.6-inch 165 Hz FHD G-Sync display.
In this review, we take the Dell G15 5530 for a spin and see how well it fares vis-à-vis the competition for the ₹1,58,990 (€1,449 or US$1659.99) asking price.
Potential competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.2 % | 06/2023 | Dell G15 5530 i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 26.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % | 03/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 31 mm | 18.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.9 % | 05/2023 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.7 % | 06/2023 | Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.4 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
82.1 % | 02/2023 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK i7-13620H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 25.2 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.9 % | 06/2023 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S | 2.2 kg | 22.1 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
88.4 % | 04/2023 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 30.7 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
89 % | 04/2023 | Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 29 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Chassis: Plastic heavyweight complemented by a bulky power brick
Dell seems to have cut-down on RGB pizzazz this time, unlike what we've seen previously with the G15 5520 and G15 5521 Special Edition. The 5530's chassis is more or less identical to that of the G15 5510.
Our G15 5530 unit is the Quantum White variant with a Deep Space Blue thermal shelf. Additionally, Dell offers two alternative color choices for this model: Dark Shadow Gray with a Black thermal shelf and Pop Purple with a Neo Mint thermal shelf.
The G15 5530 laptop features a plastic chassis that weighs nearly 3 kg, which is its main drawback. Adding to the heft is also a 1.34 kg 330 W power adapter, so gamers can expect quite the workout while lugging around this laptop.
The hinges in our unit felt somewhat stiff, but the lid can be opened with a single finger with some effort. Although the lid easily flexes with minimal force, it remains stable without wobbling in normal use.
There are no surprises in the overall chassis design, but the sharp corners and heavy weight may not be to everyone's liking.
Connectivity: Non-ideal port distribution for gamers
The port placement on the G15 5530 is less than ideal. Only the LAN port and a headphone jack are present on the left while the right side features two USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A ports. The remaining ports are located at the rear.
The absence of USB ports on the left side can be irksome for peripheral connectivity, especially for gamers who use a wired mouse.
Furthermore, the sole USB Type-C port offers DisplayPort-out functionality but lacks Power Delivery. As a result, the laptop cannot be charged without utilizing the bulky power brick.
Communication
Although the Intel AX201 WLAN card in the G15 5530 lacks support for Wi-Fi 6E, we found that its implementation in the G15 5530 still delivers excellent throughput.
Our testing, conducted with the reference Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router, showed relatively stable performance when the laptop was positioned 1 m away from the router with a clear line of sight and no external interference.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1780, n=129, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (438 - 1715, n=60) | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (390 - 1734, n=65) | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=136, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Webcam
Image quality from the 720p webcam is nothing to write home about with large color deviations (particularly with blue shades) and a lack of overall sharpness and clarity.

Security
Apart from the TPM 2.0 module, the G15 5530 does not offer any additional security features or biometric logins.
Accessories and Warranty
There are no accessories in the box other than the 330 W power adapter and the usual paperwork.
In India, Dell provides a one-year premium onsite hardware and software support as standard.
Maintenance
The G15 5530's back panel can be easily pried open after removing 10 PH00 screws. The cooling system is located on the underside of the board. The WLAN, SSD, and DDR5 RAM are all upgradable.
Dell utilizes non-conventional M.2 2242 slots (M-key) for storage. Users should take this into consideration when adding or replacing NVMe drives. The battery can be unscrewed and replaced if necessary.
Input Devices: Flat keys with shallow travel and a cramped touchpad
Keyboard
The keyboard on the G15 5530 has minimal flex and features flat, evenly spaced keys that offer a somewhat shallow travel. It includes a numpad along with calculator shortcuts for convenience. However, this layout results in the Page Up and Page Down keys being crammed together with the tiny arrow keys.
According to Dell, the G15 5530's keyboard is equipped with 4-zone RGB backlighting. However, in our unit, only orange LEDs were present with a two-stage brightness adjustment. Additionally, the keyboard was not recognized in the Alienware Command Center, limiting customization options.
The F9 key includes a Game Shift shortcut, allowing for instant switching to maximum performance and fan speed whenever needed.
Touchpad
The 6 cm x 10.5 cm touchpad feels cramped compared to other 2023 laptops. That being said, it offers smooth gliding, supports Windows Precision gestures, and is responsive even at the corners.
The clicks can get loud at times, which could be a minor annoyance for those who prefer quieter input.
The G15's input devices aren't bad per se, but users can surely benefit from an external keyboard and mouse.
Display: 165 Hz 1080p panel with overdrive
Dell equips the G15 with a 1080p AUO IPS panel that offers a 165 Hz refresh rate with G-Sync. We see significant blacklight bleeding at the corners, as is typical with IPS screens.
The brightness distribution is quite even at 94% and the contrast ratio is a respectable 1524:1, which should offer a good viewing experience for gaming.
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 321 cd/m²
Contrast: 1524:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.55 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.51
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
74.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
Dell G15 5530 AUO B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI NE180QDM-NZ2 (BOE0B35), IPS, 2560x1600, 18.00 | Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 AU Optronics B160QAN03.1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V TMX1603 (TL160ADMP03-0), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | MSI Katana 17 B13VFK B173HAN04.9, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.30 | Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16.00 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI BOE0B69, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 17% | -1% | 16% | -42% | -4% | 17% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 73.1 | 98.1 34% | 71.2 -3% | 96.61 32% | 40.8 -44% | 69.3 -5% | 98.3 34% | 69.4 -5% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.4 | 99.9 2% | 98.8 0% | 99.92 2% | 61 -38% | 97.3 -1% | 100 2% | 98 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.4 | 85.6 15% | 73.3 -1% | 84.63 14% | 42.2 -43% | 70.7 -5% | 85.9 15% | 70.9 -5% |
Response Times | -67% | -211% | -27% | -630% | -224% | -59% | -161% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3.39 ? | 5.6 ? -65% | 14.5 ? -328% | 3.8 ? -12% | 33 ? -873% | 15.6 ? -360% | 5.3 ? -56% | 13.1 ? -286% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.35 ? | 9 ? -68% | 10.4 ? -94% | 7.6 ? -42% | 26 ? -386% | 10 ? -87% | 8.6 ? -61% | 7.3 ? -36% |
PWM Frequency | 21620 ? | |||||||
Screen | 14% | 21% | 21% | -32% | 21% | 17% | 12% | |
Brightness middle | 320 | 471 47% | 405.7 27% | 486 52% | 267 -17% | 301 -6% | 327 2% | 374 17% |
Brightness | 316 | 422 34% | 368 16% | 469 48% | 256 -19% | 294 -7% | 320 1% | 357 13% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 83 -12% | 87 -7% | 91 -3% | 93 -1% | 94 0% | 89 -5% | 92 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.47 -124% | 0.38 -81% | 0.39 -86% | 0.21 -0% | 0.21 -0% | 0.38 -81% | 0.33 -57% |
Contrast | 1524 | 1002 -34% | 1068 -30% | 1246 -18% | 1271 -17% | 1433 -6% | 861 -44% | 1133 -26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.55 | 2.05 55% | 1.65 64% | 2.27 50% | 4.7 -3% | 1.79 61% | 1.01 78% | 2.43 47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.83 | 4.15 58% | 4.2 57% | 5.73 42% | 20.4 -108% | 3.48 65% | 4.01 59% | 3.97 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.51 | 0.8 47% | 0.53 65% | 0.6 60% | 4.5 -198% | 1.2 21% | 0.41 73% | 1.4 7% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 2.8 55% | 1.2 81% | 3.36 46% | 1.5 76% | 2.5 60% | 1.6 74% | 3.1 50% |
Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.204 100% | 2.3 96% | 2.46 89% | 2.12 104% | 2.265 97% | 2.168 101% | 2.191 100% |
CCT | 6479 100% | 7122 91% | 6453 101% | 6625 98% | 6552 99% | 6157 106% | 6659 98% | 6194 105% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
3% | -64% /
-17% | 3% /
13% | -235% /
-119% | -69% /
-19% | -8% /
7% | -51% /
-16% |
* ... smaller is better
The G15's out-of-the-box color accuracy exhibits noticeable deviations. However, we were able to achieve dramatic improvements with our calibration routine using the X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 spectrophotometer and Portrait Display's Calman Ultimate color calibration software.
The Grayscale average Delta E 2000 could be reduced to 0.7, while the ColorChecker average Delta E 2000 improved to 1.51.
The calibrated ICC file can be downloaded from the link above.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.35 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.34 ms rise | |
↘ 3.01 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3.39 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.4 ms rise | |
↘ 1.99 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (34.3 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 21620 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 21620 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 21620 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18704 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The G15's panel employs overdrive to achieve lower response times. It is worth noting that there is no option to deactivate panel overdrive through the Alienware Command Center.
Although the panel does not utilize PWM for brightness adjustment, it still exhibits flickering. However, this is unlikely to cause significant eye strain or discomfort for most users due to its high frequency.
For more information, check out our article, "Why PWM is such a headache". Also, the PWM Ranking table provides an overview of measured PWM frequencies across all reviewed devices to date.
Outdoor viewing does not pose major issues as long there's no direct sunlight falling on the screen. Viewing angles are wide and are relatively stable save for some perceivable loss of brightness at the extremes.
Performance: On expected lines for a Core i7-13650HX and RTX 4060 combo
Our Dell G15 5530 unit is powered by the Intel Core i7-13650HX and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU. Depending on the region, buyers can also configure this laptop with a Core i5-13450HX and an RTX 3050 6 GB or RTX 4050 Laptop GPU.
Note that the RTX 3050 option is only available in combination with the Core i5-13450HX.
Testing Conditions
The Alienware Command Center provides four predefined performance presets to choose from, but it also allows users to create and customize their own profiles.
We utilized the Performance mode for all benchmarks and tests, except for assessing battery life for which we used the Battery profile.
The table below illustrates the variations in Processor Base Power (PBP) and Maximum Turbo Power (MTP) for each scenario:
Performance mode | PL1 (PBP) / Tau | PL2 (MTP) / Tau | PL4 |
---|---|---|---|
Battery | 55 W / 56 s | 157 W / 2.44 ms | 242 W |
Quiet | 55 W / 56 s | 157 W / 2.44 ms | 242 W |
Balanced | 157 W / 56 s | 157 W / 2.44 ms | 242 W |
Performance | 191 W / 56 s | 191 W / 2.44 ms | 242 W |
Processor
The Intel Core i7-13650HX is a 14-core 20-thread Raptor Lake-HX part that offers a single-core boost up to 4.9 GHz on its P-cores.
In the Cinebench R15 multi-core loop test, the G15 5530 starts off on par with the Asus ROG Strix G18, which utilizes the same CPU. However, we observe slight throttling midway through the test. The overall CPU performance is otherwise nearly identical in both models.
The G15 5530's Core i7-13650HX offers good leads in multi-core tests over the Ryzen 9 7940HS in the Asus TUF Gaming A16, but the latter manages to stay within striking distance in cumulative performance due to its high single-core gains.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (20992 - 21006, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34613, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1834 - 1903, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (7999 - 8021, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (711 - 728, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (3136 - 3147, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (273 - 275, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=240, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 1259, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (158 - 165, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (77712 - 80057, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=232, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (5838 - 6125, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (14025 - 14367, n=2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1838 - 1852, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=239, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (22.7 - 23.6, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=236, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (46.4 - 58.8, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=231, last 2 years) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (0.4273 - 0.4398, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 |
* ... smaller is better
The graph below illustrates how various CPU parameters vary in each performance mode during a Cinebench R15 multi-core loop.
Performance and Balanced modes show similar average boost clocks around the 3.6 GHz mark while Quiet mode makes do with just a 2.6 GHz average boost.
Balanced mode is about 9 W more economical than Performance in terms of peak CPU package power draw. The core temperatures are more or less identical in both presets, however.
It's worth noting that while Quiet mode consumes just about 50.5 W package power on average, it also results in a 23% performance loss.
On battery power, Cinebench R20 single-core performance takes only a 7% hit. However, the multi-core score drops by 34%.
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (18208 - 20012, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 60169, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (91226 - 97317, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 252486, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (4343 - 4487, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 10389, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (108627 - 110093, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 200651, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 32988, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (10616 - 10764, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (44567 - 48323, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 134044, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 328679, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (85111 - 85343, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (1251 - 1262, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2409, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (9886 - 10900, n=2) | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 31796, n=229, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX (37953 - 41319, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 60161, n=230, last 2 years) | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS |
Our dedicated Intel Core i7-13650HX page offers more information and performance comparisons.
System Performance
The G15 5530 achieves a lower PCMark 10 overall score relative to the competition, but we didn't face any hiccups in general purpose computing.
The MSI Katana 17 with a Core i7-13620H manages to slightly edge out the G15 5530 in PCMark 10 and CrossMark overall scores.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 18475, n=199, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
Average Intel Core i7-13650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4748 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 6712 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6984 points | |
Help |
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell G15 5530 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Medion Erazer Major X20 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V | |
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS | |
Asus ROG Strix G18 G814JI | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16IRX8 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Dell offers two M.2 2242 slots for storage drives instead of the more ubiquitous M.2 2280 variety.
Users should upgrade the drive if they intend to install a large number of games, as the factory image only provides 398 GB free of the 512 GB capacity.
With sequential reads of less than 3,000 MB/s and sequential writes around the 500 MB/s mark, the SSTC CL4's performance is far from impressive.
There is no scope for storage expansion via 2.5-inch SATA drives.