Medion Erazer Major X20 review: Gaming notebook with RTX 4070 and solid hardware

Upgraded. Medion's heavily equipped gaming notebook offers a large 16-inch screen (QHD+, 240 Hz, G-Sync) in 16:10 format, a mechanical keyboard, 32 GB of RAM and a whopping 2 TB of storage space. A Core i9-13900HX and a GeForce RTX 4070 drive the powerful computing behemoth.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by Jacob Fisher), Published 04/26/2023 🇩🇪 🇸🇪 ...

The Medion Erazer Major X20 is primarily a gaming notebook, but is also made for other computing-intensive application scenarios. Compared to its predecessor, the X20 has received some useful upgrades: the Arc A730M graphics core has given way to a significantly more powerful GeForce RTX 4070. Furthermore, a mechanical keyboard replaces the chiclet model, while one of the two USB-C ports (USB 3.2 Gen 2) has been removed and the remaining one has been upgraded to a Thunderbolt 4 port.

The X20 is based on a Tongfang barebone (GM6PX7X), which is largely similar to the model known from the XMG Neo 16, but the port for the water cooling is missing. Competitors include laptops such as the Aorus 15X ASF, the Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22) and the Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI.

Test device courtesy of Medion

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Medion Erazer Major X20

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 140 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2175 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 140 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3161, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-4800, Dual-Chanel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB

, PCIe 4, M.2-2280, 1813 GB free

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Mic-in, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 29 x 357 x 269 ( = 1.14 x 14.06 x 10.59 in)

Battery

62.3 Wh, 4100 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Mechanical, Keyboard Light: yes, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.366 kg ( = 83.46 oz / 5.22 pounds), Power Supply: 980 g ( = 34.57 oz / 2.16 pounds)

Price

2499 Euro

Links

Medion homepage
Medion notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
89 %	04/2023	Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	29 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 %	04/2023	Aorus 15X ASF i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.3 kg	19.7 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
89.9 %	03/2023	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	2 kg	16.99 mm	15.60"	2560x1440
88.4 %	04/2023	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	30.7 mm	17.30"	2560x1440

Case - A discreet exterior for the Medion laptop

Medion uses a chic, sober chassis that does not stand out, even in a professional environment. The back of the lid of the matte black case is made of aluminum, the base unit of plastic. A non-slip rubber coating covers the base unit's upper side. In addition to the key backlight (RGB), two freely configurable LED strips (RGB) inside the rear air vents and the illuminated Erazer logo on the lid loosen up the otherwise serious-looking case.

The 16 incher reveals no manufacturing flaws. Gap dimensions are even and there are no material protrusions. The base unit can only be twisted slightly, the lid more clearly, but the entire device is within reasonable limits. The battery (screwed, not glued) and other internal components are accessible after removing the bottom shell. The hinges keep the lid firmly in position and the maximum opening angle is about 130 degrees. One-hand opening of the lid is possible.

In the comparison field, the Medion laptop is one of the devices with the thickest build. In terms of weight, it lands in the middle field.

Size Comparison

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI Medion Erazer Major X20 Aorus 15X ASF Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) DIN A4 ❌

Equipment - Major X20 offers Thunderbolt 4

The Erazer has three USB-A ports (1x USB 3.2 Gen 1, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2) and one USB-C port (Thunderbolt 4). The latter outputs a DisplayPort signal, but does not provide any Power Delivery support. The Major X20 also boasts a total of two video outputs (HDMI 2.1, DP). Further connections include a slot for a cable lock, two audio jacks and a Gigabit Ethernet port (2.5 Gbps).

Video outputs, the power slot and the network port are located on the back of the device. The corresponding cables thus run from the back and do not get in the way.

Left side: Cable lock slot, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A), mic-in, combo audio

Rear: Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; DisplayPort), HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet (2.5 GBit/s), power connector

Right side: memory card reader, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A)

SD Card Reader

The microSD memory card reader (reference card: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) is among the medium-fast models with maximum transfer rates of 78 MB/s (transfer of 250 jpg image files with around 5 MB each) and 88 MB/s (copying of large data blocks).

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=92, last 2 years)	105.5 MB/s ∼100% +35%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	80.8 MB/s ∼77% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	78 MB/s ∼74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=83, last 2 years)	129.8 MB/s ∼100% +48%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	88 MB/s ∼68%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	84.1 MB/s ∼65% -4%

Communication

WiFi data rates are excellent under optimal conditions (no WLAN devices in the immediate vicinity, small distance between laptop and server PC). The X20 has a WiFi 6E chip (Intel AX211) on board. Wired connections are handled by a chip (RTL8125; 2.5 GBit/s) from Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1662 (1535^min - 1766^max) MBit/s ∼100% +18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1650 MBit/s ∼99% +17%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1407 (1338^min - 1463^max) MBit/s ∼85%
Average of class Gaming (740 - 1780, n=83, last 2 years)	1342 MBit/s ∼81% -5%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (629 - 1861, n=83)	1320 MBit/s ∼79% -6%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1248 (589^min - 1505^max) MBit/s ∼75% -11%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1707 (1657^min - 1730^max) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1680 (1647^min - 1705^max) MBit/s ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1477 (1339^min - 1623^max) MBit/s ∼87% -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (839 - 1890, n=83)	1435 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=90, last 2 years)	1435 MBit/s ∼84% -16%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1180 (1047^min - 1233^max) MBit/s ∼69% -31%

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1407 (1338-1463)

Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1229 (589-1505)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1651 (1561-1736)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1663 (1535-1766)

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1707 (1657-1730)

Aorus 15X ASF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1180 (1047-1233)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1476 (1339-1623)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1680 (1647-1705)

Webcam

The webcam (2.1 MP, max. 1,920 x 1,080) delivers standard quality. Color accuracy is lacking: at a color deviation of about 11, the target (DeltaE less than 3) is missed. No mechanical shutter is on board.

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Major X20: 10.63 ∆E min: 1.46 - max: 23.48 ∆E

Accessories

Apart from the usual documents (quick start guide and warranty information), no other accessories are included with the notebook.

Maintenance

After removing all screws on the underside of the device, the bottom shell can be detached using a flat spatula or a joint smoother. You then have access to the two RAM slots (both occupied), the two SSDs (PCIe 4, M.2-2280), the WLAN module, the fans, the BIOS battery and the laptop battery.

Warranty

Medion provides a two-year warranty on the Erazer in Germany. This may differ in other countries, so buyers should double check before purchasing.

Warranty extensions are available but have to be purchased together with the notebook in Medion's online store. A subsequent purchase is not possible.

Input Devices - Mechanical keyboard with Cherry MX switches

Keyboard

Instead of a chiclet keyboard, Medion has installed a mechanical keyboard into the X20. The Cherry MX switches have a medium travel and a clearly audible and noticeable pressure point. The user is spoiled with a rich typing feel and precise feedback, and the keyboard does not yield during typing. Two function keys regulate the brightness of the four-stage individual key illumination (RGB). Overall, we can speak of a solid keyboard here.

Touchpad

A multi-touch capable clickpad (approx. 11.6 x 7.2 cm) serves as a mouse replacement. Its smooth surface makes finger gliding easy. It offers short travel and a clear pressure point. A finger tap on the LED in the upper left corner turns the entire pad on or off.

Display - QHD+ in 16:10-Format

Medion installs a 240 Hz panel with G-Sync support. The latter dynamically adjusts the refresh rates of the display and GPU to create the smoothest possible picture quality - particularly when gaming.

PWM flickering is not present at any brightness setting. The brightness and contrast of the matte 16-inch panel (2560x1600) in the work-friendly 16:10 format reach the respective target (> 300 cd/m² or 1000:1).


346 cd/m²	345 cd/m²	349 cd/m²
348 cd/m²	374 cd/m²	362 cd/m²
357 cd/m²	369 cd/m²	364 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 374 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 357.1 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 374 cd/m²
Contrast: 1133:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.43 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
70.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.191

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion Erazer Major X20 BOE CQ NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00	Aorus 15X ASF BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60	Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60	Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI BOE0B69, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display		-0%	25%	22%
Display P3 Coverage	69.4	69.3 0%	97.6 41%	98.3 42%
sRGB Coverage	98	98.2 0%	99.4 1%	100 2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	70.9	70.5 -1%	94 33%	85.9 21%
Response Times		-12%	79%	21%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	13.1 ?(6, 7.1)	12.4 ?(6, 6.4) 5%	2 ?(1, 1) 85%	5.3 ?(2.4, 2.9) 60%
Response Time Black / White *	7.3 ?(3.1, 4.2)	9.4 ?(4.9, 4.5) -29%	2 ?(1, 1) 73%	8.6 ?(3.7, 4.9) -18%
PWM Frequency			500 ?(70)
Screen		14%	126%	12%
Brightness middle	374	316 -16%	383 2%	327 -13%
Brightness	357	301 -16%	384 8%	320 -10%
Brightness Distribution	92	90 -2%	99 8%	89 -3%
Black Level *	0.33	0.28 15%	0.03 91%	0.38 -15%
Contrast	1133	1129 0%	12767 1027%	861 -24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.43	1.54 37%	1.89 22%	1.01 58%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.97	2.46 38%	3.76 5%	4.01 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.4	1.21 14%	2.67 -91%	0.41 71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.1	1.3 58%	1.26 59%	1.6 48%
Gamma	2.191 ^100%	2.307 ^95%	2.41 ^91%	2.168 ^101%
CCT	6194 ^105%	6456 ^101%	6386 ^102%	6659 ^98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		1% / 7%	77% / 97%	18% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

The screen produces good color representation in the delivery state: The target (DeltaE < 3) is reached with a deviation of about 2.4. Manual calibration reduces the deviation to 1.4 and ensures a more balanced grayscale.

The panel completely covers the sRGB color space, but not the AdobeRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces. If all three color spaces are required, there is no way around the Blade 15's OLED screen.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.1 ms rise
7.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6 ms rise
13.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19046 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Reading the screen outdoors is possible if the sun is not too strong.

Performance - Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace power the gaming notebook

Gaming, rendering, and generally all performance demanding application areas count among the Erazer Major X20's application scenarios. Raptor Lake and Ada Lovelace provide the necessary computing power. This model is available for around EUR 2,500 (~US$2,500).

Testing Conditions

The X20 offers three manufacturer-specific power modes (see table), which you can select via a separate button (next to the power button). A status LED reveals which mode is active. "Turbo Mode" (benchmarks) and "Office Mode" (battery tests) were used. Optimus was active.

Individual profiles can be created using the preinstalled Control Center software. For example, the power limits of the CPU, the TGP of the GPU and/or the upper temperature limits can be adjusted.

We used the English-language interface of the CC software because the German translation was partially unsuccessful. You can switch between the two languages.

	Turbo Mode (dt: Overboost)	Balance Mode (dt: Balanced)	Office Mode (dt: Balanced)
CPU PL1 (HWInfo)	140 watts	140 watts	140 watts
CPU PL2 (HWInfo)	140 watts	140 watts	140 watts
Noise (Witcher 3)	50-53 dB(A)	48-51 dB(A)	36-43 dB(A), later 32-34 dB(A)
Performance (Witcher 3)	124 fps	118 fps	114-118 fps, later 30 fps lock

Processor

The Core-i9-13900HX processor (Raptor Lake) consists of eight performance cores (hyperthreading, 2.2 to 5.4 GHz) and sixteen efficiency cores (no hyperthreading, 1.6 to 3.9 GHz). In total, there are 32 logical CPU cores. The benchmark results are on par with the CPU's average rates.

The CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark were run at high to maximum clock rates in mains operation. Single-thread performance (222 points), which is relevant to everyday use, drops significantly less in battery mode than multi-thread performance (1025 points).

The CB15 loop test reveals that a high turbo clock is consistently sustained under multi-thread load in mains operation. The clock rate only drops minimally over the course of the test.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4327 (4285.41-4407.71)

Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX: Ø2776 (2691.43-3460.13)

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)

Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX: Ø4920 (4749.47-5204.94)

CPU clock rates during execution of the CB15 loop (Turbo Mode)

CPU clock rates during execution of the CB15 loop (Balanced Mode)

CPU clock rates during execution of the CB15 loop (Office Mode)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	82 pt ∼82%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	81.2 pt ∼81%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.1 pt ∼80%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	64.3 pt ∼64%
Average of class Gaming	52.2 pt ∼52%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	52 pt ∼52%

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	32379 Points ∼100% +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (26407 - 32623, n=17)	28496 Points ∼88% +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	27788 Points ∼86%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	20297 Points ∼63% -27%
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=238, last 2 years)	16258 Points ∼50% -41%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	15600 Points ∼48% -44%
Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1972 - 2097, n=14)	2057 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points ∼99%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	1897 Points ∼92% -7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	1863 Points ∼91% -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1721 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=236, last 2 years)	1675 Points ∼81% -18%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9992 - 12541, n=15)	10910 Points ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	10484 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	10025 Points ∼92% -4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	7852 Points ∼72% -25%
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=240, last 2 years)	6138 Points ∼56% -41%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	6007 Points ∼55% -43%
CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (756 - 810, n=15)	788 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	777 Points ∼99%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	726 Points ∼92% -7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	712 Points ∼90% -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	662 Points ∼84% -15%
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=240, last 2 years)	646 Points ∼82% -17%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	5205 (4749.47^min - 5204.94^max) Points ∼100% +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4274 - 4970, n=16)	4600 Points ∼88% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4407.71 Points ∼85%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	3460 Points ∼66% -22%
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=243, last 2 years)	2606 Points ∼50% -41%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	2543 Points ∼49% -42%
CPU Single 64Bit
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (278 - 304, n=16)	295 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	294 Points ∼99% -1%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	277 Points ∼93% -7%
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=244, last 2 years)	251 Points ∼85% -15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	249 Points ∼84% -16%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=241, last 2 years)	234 Seconds * ∼100% -107%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	220 Seconds * ∼94% -95%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	181 Seconds * ∼77% -60%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=16)	116.2 Seconds * ∼50% -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113 Seconds * ∼48%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	100 Seconds * ∼43% +12%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	123364 MIPS ∼100% +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	113598 MIPS ∼92%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (93947 - 127283, n=15)	113288 MIPS ∼92% 0%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	74733 MIPS ∼61% -34%
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=237, last 2 years)	65845 MIPS ∼53% -42%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	63825 MIPS ∼52% -44%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	7332 MIPS ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6610 - 7177, n=15)	6898 MIPS ∼94% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6895 MIPS ∼94%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	6407 MIPS ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=238, last 2 years)	5820 MIPS ∼79% -16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	5367 MIPS ∼73% -22%

Geekbench 5.4
Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (18109 - 21075, n=16)	19998 Points ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	19213 Points ∼96%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	18372 Points ∼92% -4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	15191 Points ∼76% -21%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	12215 Points ∼61% -36%
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=236, last 2 years)	11579 Points ∼58% -40%
Single-Core
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	2053 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2033 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1924 - 2093, n=16)	2028 Points ∼99% 0%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	1860 Points ∼91% -9%
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=236, last 2 years)	1690 Points ∼82% -17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	1661 Points ∼81% -18%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	33.8 fps ∼100% +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24.2 - 34.4, n=16)	29.6 fps ∼88% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	28.9 fps ∼86%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	19.7 fps ∼58% -32%
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=241, last 2 years)	18.2 fps ∼54% -37%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	17.3 fps ∼51% -40%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	50.7 s * ∼100% -20%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=237, last 2 years)	50.7 s * ∼100% -20%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	45.7 s * ∼90% -8%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	43.6 s * ∼86% -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	42.4 s * ∼84%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 50.8, n=15)	41.7 s * ∼82% +2%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H	0.503 sec * ∼100% -28%
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=237, last 2 years)	0.503 sec * ∼100% -28%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX	0.4403 sec * ∼88% -12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX	0.4159 sec * ∼83% -6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4234, n=16)	0.3968 sec * ∼79% -1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3922 sec * ∼78%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4407.71 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

264.8 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

297 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.6 pt ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	66.3 pt ∼66%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65.2 pt ∼65%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	49.9 pt ∼50%
Average of class Gaming	43.7 pt ∼44%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	42.5 pt ∼43%

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	52479 KRay/s ∼100% +109%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	25147 KRay/s ∼48%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=16)	24331 KRay/s ∼46% -3%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	17289 KRay/s ∼33% -31%
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 55084, n=214, last 2 years)	14839 KRay/s ∼28% -41%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	13493 KRay/s ∼26% -46%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	227882 Points ∼100% +82%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	125161 Points ∼55%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 136688, n=16)	121118 Points ∼53% -3%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86201 Points ∼38% -31%
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 234848, n=214, last 2 years)	77881 Points ∼34% -38%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	71736 Points ∼31% -43%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	8525 MB/s ∼100% +37%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	6234 MB/s ∼73%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=16)	6108 MB/s ∼72% -2%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	3879 MB/s ∼46% -38%
Average of class Gaming (629 - 9930, n=214, last 2 years)	3657 MB/s ∼43% -41%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	3400 MB/s ∼40% -45%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	180473 Points ∼100% +35%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=16)	134203 Points ∼74% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	134141 Points ∼74%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	110085 Points ∼61% -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	106137 Points ∼59% -21%
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 186519, n=214, last 2 years)	101463 Points ∼56% -24%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	29598 Points ∼100% +93%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	15349 Points ∼52%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=16)	15093 Points ∼51% -2%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	11602 Points ∼39% -24%
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 30810, n=214, last 2 years)	11138 Points ∼38% -27%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	9706 Points ∼33% -37%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	118401 Points ∼100% +88%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	62932 Points ∼53%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=16)	60321 Points ∼51% -4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42851 Points ∼36% -32%
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 124377, n=214, last 2 years)	41499 Points ∼35% -34%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34034 Points ∼29% -46%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	167732 MB/s ∼100% +40%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	147294 MB/s ∼88% +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 236139, n=16)	140370 MB/s ∼84% +17%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	119757 MB/s ∼71%
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=214, last 2 years)	105570 MB/s ∼63% -12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99217 MB/s ∼59% -17%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2090 MB/s ∼100% +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1804 MB/s ∼86%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=16)	1770 MB/s ∼85% -2%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1092 MB/s ∼52% -39%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	1064 MB/s ∼51% -41%
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2231, n=229, last 2 years)	954 MB/s ∼46% -47%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	28105 KRay/s ∼100% +105%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	13736 KRay/s ∼49%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=16)	13184 KRay/s ∼47% -4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9194 KRay/s ∼33% -33%
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 29473, n=214, last 2 years)	8057 KRay/s ∼29% -41%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	7268 KRay/s ∼26% -47%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=16)	47838 MPixel/s ∼100% +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	42994 MPixel/s ∼90%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	35342 MPixel/s ∼74% -18%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34573 MPixel/s ∼72% -20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	34312 MPixel/s ∼72% -20%
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 52949, n=215, last 2 years)	31427 MPixel/s ∼66% -27%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	31421 MPixel/s ∼66% -27%

System Performance

The smoothly running system does not lack computing power. The laptop handles gaming, rendering, and video editing without issue, as confirmed by the good PCMark results. The transfer rates of the RAM are on a normal level for DDR5-4800 memory.

PCMark 10 / Score
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7575 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7449 Points ∼98% -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7336 Points ∼97% -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (6956 - 7575, n=2)	7266 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=195, last 2 years)	7263 Points ∼96% -4%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7178 Points ∼95% -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11653 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11166 Points ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9865 - 11653, n=2)	10759 Points ∼92% -8%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10705 Points ∼92% -8%
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=194, last 2 years)	10460 Points ∼90% -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10328 Points ∼89% -11%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11087 Points ∼100% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10024 Points ∼90% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	9850 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9470 - 9850, n=2)	9660 Points ∼87% -2%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9637 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=194, last 2 years)	9457 Points ∼85% -4%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=194, last 2 years)	10572 Points ∼100% +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10350 Points ∼98% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10278 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (9776 - 10278, n=2)	10027 Points ∼95% -2%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9731 Points ∼92% -5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	9062 Points ∼86% -12%

CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2065 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2037 Points ∼99% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1842 - 2029, n=2)	1936 Points ∼94% +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1842 Points ∼89%
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=117, last 2 years)	1842 Points ∼89% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1730 Points ∼84% -6%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1960 Points ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1917 Points ∼98% +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1700 - 1872, n=2)	1786 Points ∼91% +5%
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=117, last 2 years)	1762 Points ∼90% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1700 Points ∼87%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1641 Points ∼84% -3%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2313 Points ∼100% +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (2088 - 2310, n=2)	2199 Points ∼95% +5%
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2193 Points ∼95% +5%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2088 Points ∼90%
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=117, last 2 years)	1988 Points ∼86% -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1883 Points ∼81% -10%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2016 Points ∼100% +25%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=117, last 2 years)	1690 Points ∼84% +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (1608 - 1752, n=2)	1680 Points ∼83% +4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1671 Points ∼83% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1608 Points ∼80%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1573 Points ∼78% -2%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4889 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6067 points
PCMark 10 Score		7575 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=16)	74197 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	67755 MB/s ∼91%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	57467 MB/s ∼77% -15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	55639 MB/s ∼75% -18%
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 80776, n=214, last 2 years)	52718 MB/s ∼71% -22%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	48948 MB/s ∼66% -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=16)	81179 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	73998 MB/s ∼91%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66898 MB/s ∼82% -10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	61461 MB/s ∼76% -17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	59759 MB/s ∼74% -19%
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=214, last 2 years)	56589 MB/s ∼70% -24%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=16)	72259 MB/s ∼100% +10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	65604 MB/s ∼91%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	58602 MB/s ∼81% -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58073 MB/s ∼80% -11%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	55411 MB/s ∼77% -16%
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=214, last 2 years)	53741 MB/s ∼74% -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	99.4 ns * ∼100% -10%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90.6 ns * ∼91%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.8 ns * ∼87% +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=16)	86.6 ns * ∼87% +4%
Aorus 15X ASF Intel Core i7-13700HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	86.2 ns * ∼87% +5%
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=229, last 2 years)	73.6 ns * ∼74% +19%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

The standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4k video playback, Prime95 high-load) revealed anomalies. The system does not seem to be suitable for real-time video and audio editing. Future software updates may improve this or lead to further deterioration.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 15X ASF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i7-13700HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1813 μs * ∼100% -3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1752.1 μs * ∼97%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1489 μs * ∼82% +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	933.2 μs * ∼51% +47%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The Erazer houses two 1 TB SSDs (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) from Phison, which deliver good performance rates overall. The SSDs do not form a RAID array, nor does the X20 offer RAID support - one SSD serves as the system drive, the other as data storage. A positive aspect: thermal throttling was not observed.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7038 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5008 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 942.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 783.9 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 3007 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 3328 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 57.06 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 263.2 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	93.1 pt ∼93%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	86.2 pt ∼86%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	81.4 pt ∼81%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 pt ∼81%
Average of class Gaming	68.4 pt ∼68%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	52 pt ∼52%

DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3564 (3515.46^min - 3563.69^max) MB/s ∼100% +13%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3419 (3322.79^min - 3419.41^max) MB/s ∼96% +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3377 (3319.03^min - 3377.04^max) MB/s ∼95% +7%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3127 - 3582, n=3)	3287 MB/s ∼92% +4%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3153 (2810.23^min - 3153.26^max) MB/s ∼88%
Average of class Gaming (834 - 6045, n=196, last 2 years)	3145 MB/s ∼88% 0%
seq write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3531 (3391.93^min - 3530.77^max) MB/s ∼100% +41%
Average of class Gaming (399 - 9108, n=195, last 2 years)	3358 MB/s ∼95% +34%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3270 (3004.03^min - 3269.84^max) MB/s ∼93% +30%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2507 - 3714, n=3)	3146 MB/s ∼89% +25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2743 (2563.98^min - 2742.87^max) MB/s ∼78% +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2507 MB/s ∼71%
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7018 (6152.48^min - 7017.7^max) MB/s ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6966 (5571.08^min - 6965.69^max) MB/s ∼99%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (6956 - 6976, n=3)	6966 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6663 (6017.91^min - 6663.07^max) MB/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming (1620 - 16089, n=196, last 2 years)	5535 MB/s ∼79% -21%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5018 (4382.25^min - 5017.89^max) MB/s ∼72% -28%
seq q8 t1 write
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4980 (4904.66^min - 4979.58^max) MB/s ∼100% +34%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3723 - 5011, n=3)	4573 MB/s ∼92% +23%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4398 (3867.15^min - 4398.16^max) MB/s ∼88% +18%
Average of class Gaming (86.2 - 14571, n=196, last 2 years)	4136 MB/s ∼83% +11%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3723 (3590.69^min - 3723.28^max) MB/s ∼75%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3125 (3099.17^min - 3124.97^max) MB/s ∼63% -16%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 (79.58^min - 81.23^max) MB/s ∼100% +42%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	73.5 (69.87^min - 73.51^max) MB/s ∼91% +28%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (56.8 - 84.3, n=3)	66.1 MB/s ∼81% +16%
Average of class Gaming (23.3 - 97.4, n=196, last 2 years)	65.7 MB/s ∼81% +15%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	57.2 (55.31^min - 57.16^max) MB/s ∼70%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	53.7 (52.37^min - 53.65^max) MB/s ∼66% -6%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	346 (334.68^min - 346.11^max) MB/s ∼100% +26%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (275 - 295, n=3)	284 MB/s ∼82% +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	275 (272.08^min - 274.75^max) MB/s ∼79%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	212 (209.62^min - 211.78^max) MB/s ∼61% -23%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 421, n=195, last 2 years)	210 MB/s ∼61% -24%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	163.8 (162.54^min - 163.76^max) MB/s ∼47% -40%
4k q32 t16 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4152 (4133.05^min - 4152.1^max) MB/s ∼100% +16%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3578 (3566.03^min - 3578.13^max) MB/s ∼86%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3543 - 3578, n=3)	3557 MB/s ∼86% -1%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3552 (3501.51^min - 3552.08^max) MB/s ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming (313 - 5829, n=195, last 2 years)	2351 MB/s ∼57% -34%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	857 (717.83^min - 857.03^max) MB/s ∼21% -76%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3610 (3279.33^min - 3609.84^max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3607 (3566.02^min - 3606.71^max) MB/s ∼100%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3398 - 3688, n=3)	3564 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3512 (3421.77^min - 3511.78^max) MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average of class Gaming (288 - 4869, n=195, last 2 years)	2039 MB/s ∼56% -43%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	305 (269.91^min - 305.05^max) MB/s ∼8% -92%

AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9097 Points ∼100% +7%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (8477 - 8906, n=3)	8641 Points ∼95% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8541 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7180 Points ∼79% -16%
Average of class Gaming (910 - 10745, n=184, last 2 years)	6355 Points ∼70% -26%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4118 Points ∼45% -52%
Score Read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3530 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3332 - 3464, n=3)	3397 Points ∼96% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3332 Points ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2858 Points ∼81% -14%
Average of class Gaming (389 - 3980, n=184, last 2 years)	2377 Points ∼67% -29%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1204 Points ∼34% -64%
Score Write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3794 Points ∼100% +6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3583 Points ∼94%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3399 - 3707, n=3)	3563 Points ∼94% -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2916 Points ∼77% -19%
Average of class Gaming (338 - 5157, n=184, last 2 years)	2812 Points ∼74% -22%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2387 Points ∼63% -33%
Seq Read
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (4774 - 5200, n=3)	4925 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4774.16 MB/s ∼97%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4649.46 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4623.95 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Average of class Gaming (925 - 12763, n=184, last 2 years)	4359 MB/s ∼89% -9%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3846 MB/s ∼78% -19%
Seq Write
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (3290 - 4309, n=3)	3842 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3810.26 MB/s ∼99% +16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3551.32 MB/s ∼92% +8%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3289.95 MB/s ∼86%
Average of class Gaming (308 - 11316, n=184, last 2 years)	3168 MB/s ∼82% -4%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1821 MB/s ∼47% -45%
4K Read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	100.75 MB/s ∼100% +44%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (60.6 - 97.3, n=3)	76 MB/s ∼75% +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	69.95 MB/s ∼69%
Average of class Gaming (20 - 108, n=184, last 2 years)	64.4 MB/s ∼64% -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	60.3 MB/s ∼60% -14%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	51.29 MB/s ∼51% -27%
4K Write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	308.92 MB/s ∼100% +83%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (168.4 - 294, n=3)	213 MB/s ∼69% +26%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	196.8 MB/s ∼64% +17%
Average of class Gaming (18 - 364, n=184, last 2 years)	190.2 MB/s ∼62% +13%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	183.9 MB/s ∼60% +9%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	168.39 MB/s ∼55%
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2964.13 MB/s ∼100% +6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2784 - 2854, n=3)	2828 MB/s ∼95% +2%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2784.37 MB/s ∼94%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2335.71 MB/s ∼79% -16%
Average of class Gaming (216 - 3395, n=184, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s ∼63% -33%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	768 MB/s ∼26% -72%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15X ASF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3103.89 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3085.54 MB/s ∼99%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (2831 - 3086, n=3)	2966 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2376.83 MB/s ∼77% -23%
Average of class Gaming (243 - 4381, n=184, last 2 years)	2310 MB/s ∼74% -25%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2008 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.121 ms * ∼100% -55%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.083 ms * ∼69% -6%
Average Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R (0.078 - 0.086, n=3)	0.083 ms * ∼69% -6%
Medion Erazer Major X20 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit in comparison
Toshiba Satellite W30Dt-A-100 (min) A4-1200, Radeon HD 8180	33
...
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4339
TR 2970WX, RX Vega 64	4376
Schenker Key 17 Pro (Early 23) i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4399
Medion Erazer Major X20 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4407.71
Razer Blade 18 RTX 4070 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4481
Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4487
R9 5950X, NVIDIA Titan RTX	4492
...
(max) TR Pro 3995WX, Radeon Pro W6800	9706