Notebookcheck Logo

Medion Erazer Major X10 laptop review: Debut of Intel Arc A730M

Struggling against Nvidia and AMD. The Medion Major X10 is a highly exciting 16-inch gaming laptop. It is the first notebook we have reviewed that features Intel's Arc A730M graphics card. In this review, we will see how it compares with other laptops in terms of performance.

The Erazer Major X10 costs around 1,700 Euro (US$1,728) and is available on Medion's online shop. For the price, you are getting not just 32 GB of dual-channel RAM (2 x 16 GB DDR5-4800) but also 1 TB of NVMe storage. The laptop features the Core i7-12700H, a 14-core processor that is very popular in gaming laptops. As mentioned at the beginning, demanding graphics processing is handled by Intel's Arc A730M – a mid-range GPU that is primarily designed to compete with the GeForce RTX 3060 and the Radeon RX 6600M. The laptop also features a matt 165Hz display with a 16:10 aspect ratio and a resolution of 2,560 x 1,600. Windows 11 Home rounds off the overall package.

Medion Erazer Major X10 (Erazer Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 75 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc A730M - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2050 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, GDDR6, 30.0.101.1736, Switchable Graphics
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB of SODIMM DDR5-4800, dual channel, two slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, AUO B160QAN03.H, IPS, QHD+, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R, 1024 GB 
, NVMe SSD, two M.2 slots (one empty)
Soundcard
Intel Alder Point-M/P PCH - HD Audio
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 4 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 1 Combined (Headset/Mic)
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-V (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 359 x 265 ( = 1.22 x 14.13 x 10.43 in)
Battery
80 Wh, 5195 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 Cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 300 W power supply, Medion Control Center, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.51 kg ( = 88.54 oz / 5.53 pounds), Power Supply: 880 g ( = 31.04 oz / 1.94 pounds)
Price
1700 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The Major X10 is competing with other mid-range gaming laptops, such as the Asus TUF F17 FX707Z-HX011W, the Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R (both with RTX 3060; one with a higher and the other with an average TGP) and the HP Omen 16-c0077ng (RX 6600M). The supposedly slower Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 with GeForce RTX 3050 Ti is likewise included in the comparison tables. We will explain why later in the review.

Comparison with possible competitors

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
85 %
09/2022
Medion Erazer Major X10
i7-12700H, A730M
2.5 kg31 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.1 %
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.9 %
08/2022
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3.1 kg28.6 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.4 %
08/2022
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg18.99 mm16.00"3072x1920
86 %
04/2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440

Chassis

Appearance-wise, the Major X10 reminds us of Lenovo's Legion series. Medion chose to use a matt black chassis with an aluminium lid. The chassis feels solid in our opinion, even though the base section can definitely flex in some spots when you apply more force and the lid could be somewhat firmer (as is the case with most laptops). The display can be opened up to 180°, which is rather unusual for a laptop. And the hinges do their job without any issues. For instance, the device can be easily opened with one hand. Medion has equipped the laptop with numerous lighting elements to make it appealing to gamers. Apart from the keyboard, the logo on the lid and the crosshairs at the rear of the sides also stand out visually. The air vents above the keyboard feature a crosshair design to complement the overall aesthetics.

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

The Major X10 has a very good fit and finish. On our review unit, all the surfaces are joined together neatly. At 2.5 kg (5.5 lb), the 16-inch device is neither light nor especially heavy for a gaming laptop. For comparison, the slightly larger Asus TUF F17 and Acer Nitro 5 AN517 weigh 2.5 kg (5.5 lb) and 3.1 kg (6.8 lb) respectively, whilst the 16-inch competitors Omen 16 and Inspiron 16 Plus are marginally lighter at 2.3 kg (5.1 lb) and 2.1 kg (4.6 lb) respectively. According to the manufacturer, the Major X10 has a thickness of 2.7 cm (1.06") without its feet and 3.1 cm (1.22") with them.

Size comparison

400.5 mm / 15.8 inch 294 mm / 11.6 inch 28.6 mm / 1.126 inch 3.1 kg6.75 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.5 kg5.54 lbs370 mm / 14.6 inch 245 mm / 9.65 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.3 kg4.96 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 265 mm / 10.4 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 2.5 kg5.53 lbs356.78 mm / 14 inch 251.9 mm / 9.92 inch 18.99 mm / 0.748 inch 2.1 kg4.53 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Features

Interfaces

If you don't mind not having a Thunderbolt port and a card reader, you would be satisfied with the laptop's port selection. There are three USB Type A and two Type C ports (compatible with DisplayPort), and all except one of them support the 3.2 Gen 2 standard. The laptop is also equipped with a combo audio jack (headphones and microphone), an RJ45 Ethernet port and a HDMI 2.0 output. Because the most important ports are located at the back of the laptop, you won't have to worry about your movement being greatly restricted while you are gaming with an external mouse.

On the left: USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 3.5 mm audio jack
On the left: USB-A 3.2 Gen 2, 3.5 mm audio jack
On the rear: RJ45 Ethernet, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.0, power port
On the rear: RJ45 Ethernet, 1x USB-A 3.2 Gen 1, HDMI 2.0, power port
On the right: 2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (incl. DisplayPort), USB-A 3.2 Gen 2
On the right: 2x USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (incl. DisplayPort), USB-A 3.2 Gen 2

Connectivity

There were no surprises during our Wi-Fi test (laptop 1 m away from our reference router Asus AXE11000). The Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 module inside the device delivers high transfer speeds, in line with expectations.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1734 (1678min - 1748max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=74)
1437 MBit/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=156, last 2 years)
1398 MBit/s -19%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1481 (1366min - 1520max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (438 - 1715, n=69)
1299 MBit/s -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=150, last 2 years)
1265 MBit/s -15%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1734 (1678-1748)
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (1366-1520)

Webcam

Medion could do with a better webcam. Although the webcam is slightly sharper and faster than many of its competitors, it is lacking in colour accuracy, much like many built-in webcams on laptops.

ColorChecker
16 ∆E
16.5 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Major X10: 15.55 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 22.25 ∆E

Accessories

Our review unit only came with a 300-watt power supply that measures approx. 20 x 9 x 2 cm (7.9 x 3.5 x 0.8").

Maintenance

The inside of the device can be accessed for maintenance in the same way as with most gaming laptops. After removing 11 Phillips screws from the bottom, you can lift the bottom cover off the laptop. Because there are clips holding the cover in place, you will need to apply a good amount of force using a flat tool to do. Inside the chassis, you will find two SODIMM slots, two M.2 slots (both located underneath a cover), the wireless module and the battery. The cooling system consists of two fans that share several heat pipes.

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

Warranty

The Erazer Major X10 comes with a 24-month warranty.

Input devices

Keyboard

The 16-inch laptop features a chiclet keyboard with a complete numeric pad whose keys are slightly narrower than the rest. Unlike many other manufacturers, Medion decided to use decently sized arrow keys rather than those tiny ones – some gamers are going to be happy about this. We also like the keyboard's layout, which mostly adheres to the standard QWERTZ design. One of the highlights is the four-zone RGB lighting with adjustable brightness levels. Several modes are available to let you customise the lighting. The keyboard feels decent to type on for a gaming laptop, i.e. it gives you sufficient feedback.

Medion Erazer Major X10
Medion Erazer Major X10

Touchpad

There is also nothing much to complain about the touchpad. Measuring around 12 x 6.5 cm (4.7 x 2.6"), it allows fingers to slide over it effortlessly thanks to its fairly smooth surface and also doesn't exhibit any issues (e.g. with precision, gestures). Only the areas for clicking at the bottom were a little too flimsy for our liking, despite being sturdy enough.

Display

The top-notch display is an outstanding feature of the device. Right now, 16:10 panels are becoming more and more popular in gaming laptops as well. And Medion is following this trend.

429
cd/m²
403
cd/m²
421
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
489
cd/m²
462
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
435
cd/m²
411
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B160QAN03.H tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 489 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 435.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 489 cd/m²
Contrast: 1223:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.27
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
72.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.205
Medion Erazer Major X10
AUO B160QAN03.H, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
B173HAN04.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
BOE NE16N41, IPS, 3072x1920, 16.00
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Display
-42%
-15%
1%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
70.4
40.2
-43%
58.9
-16%
70.8
1%
68.8
-2%
sRGB Coverage
98
59.7
-39%
86.4
-12%
99.5
2%
96.9
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
72.5
41.5
-43%
60.5
-17%
73.2
1%
71.1
-2%
Response Times
-273%
16%
-256%
-25%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13.9 ?(6.5, 7.4)
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
-182%
6 ?(3, 3)
57%
38 ?(21.2, 16.8)
-173%
13 ?(6, 7)
6%
Response Time Black / White *
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
-363%
8 ?(4, 4)
-25%
28 ?(13.2, 14.8)
-338%
10 ?(5, 5)
-56%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-66%
-36%
9%
-30%
Brightness middle
489
287
-41%
286
-42%
288.9
-41%
297
-39%
Brightness
436
268
-39%
278
-36%
276
-37%
283
-35%
Brightness Distribution
82
89
9%
89
9%
92
12%
91
11%
Black Level *
0.4
0.17
57%
0.32
20%
0.26
35%
0.22
45%
Contrast
1223
1688
38%
894
-27%
1111
-9%
1350
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.08
5.1
-145%
3.05
-47%
1.88
10%
3.25
-56%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.27
8.72
-104%
5.83
-37%
4.37
-2%
6.33
-48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.27
5.1
-302%
3.13
-146%
0.42
67%
1.11
13%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.6
4.24
-63%
3.17
-22%
1.4
46%
6.97
-168%
Gamma
2.205 100%
2.44 90%
2.29 96%
2.3 96%
2.3 96%
CCT
6797 96%
6008 108%
6916 94%
6634 98%
6050 107%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-127% / -90%
-12% / -24%
-82% / -30%
-19% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

The 165Hz display made by AUO (model B160QAN03.H) is exceptional in almost every regard. First, it outclasses the competition when it comes to peak brightness. The panel has a good average peak brightness of 436 cd/m², thus making the Major X10 quite suitable for outdoor use. For comparison, the competitors can't even hit 300 cd/m².

CalMAN: Greyscale
CalMAN: Greyscale
CalMAN: Colour saturation
CalMAN: Colour saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Greyscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Greyscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Colour saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Colour saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

Second, the contrast ratio of 1,233:1 is excellent for an IPS panel. However, this is only enough to place the laptop in the middle of our comparison group. That said, the display is already fairly colour-accurate right out of the box, as shown by the measurements we took using CalMan (see screenshots). Its colour coverage should be able to satisfy most consumers – the 98% sRGB coverage is more than adequate for a gaming notebook. And the screen is able to cover up to 73% of the AdobeRGB and 70% of the P3 colour space.

Medion Erazer Major X10 vs sRGB
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs sRGB
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs AdobeRGB
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs AdobeRGB
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs P3
Medion Erazer Major X10 vs P3

The viewing angle is typical of an IPS panel. Our measurement device reported response times of 6 ms (black-to-white) and 14 ms (grey-to-grey), which is likewise not bad relative to the other laptops in our comparison. However, it is a little unfortunate that there is some noticeable IPS glow around the edges. Our review unit had a brightness distribution of just 82%.

Light on the screen
Light on the screen
Subpixel array
Subpixel array
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 4.4 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.5 ms rise
↘ 7.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.6 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17788 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Performance

Although having 32 GB of RAM and 12 GB of VRAM screams high-end, we would only classify the Major X10 as a mid-range machine due to its less-than-stellar graphics performance (more in-depth analysis later on). At 1,700 Euro (US$1,728), the overall package can't really be considered a great deal.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
 

Test conditions

You can choose between three profiles in the preinstalled Control Center software. Unless otherwise stated, measurements were taken with the Major X10 in Gaming mode, which should be similar to performance mode on other laptops. You can find the PL1 and PL2 settings of the various profiles in the table below.

Control Center
Control Center
Control Center

Processor

The Core i7-12700H found in this Medion laptop is a current-gen 10-nm processor from Intel's Alder Lake lineup. The high-end option offers 6 performance and 8 efficiency cores and can handle up to 20 threads in parallel using Hyper-Threading. In our series of CPU tests, the Major X10 performed well even without Turbo mode activated. During the Cinebench R15 loop, its performance settled down at a fairly consistent level that is slightly higher than the what the 12700H's rivals are capable of. Even the Ryzen 7 5800H in the HP Omen 16 can't match this level of performance.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2237 (2206.41-2384.22)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2176 (2139.15-2407.46)
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1998 (1901.59-2430.28)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
84.1 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.7 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
72.7 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
71.5 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
70 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
67.7 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54.9 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=223, last 2 years)
19964 Points +34%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
14899 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
14704 (12621.1min - 14704.4max) Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
13774 Points -8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points -18%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=221, last 2 years)
1824 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
1822 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
1816 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1766 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points -22%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=221, last 2 years)
7590 Points +37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
6030 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points +7%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5648 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
5545 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points -13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points -15%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=221, last 2 years)
702 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
698 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
680 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points -21%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=226, last 2 years)
3150 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points +18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points +6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
2430 (1901.59min - 2430.28max) Points +2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
2412 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
2384 (2206.41min - 2384.22max) Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points -15%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=225, last 2 years)
269 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points 0%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
254 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points -13%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * -16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
235 Seconds * -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
227 Seconds * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
217 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=218, last 2 years)
197.1 Seconds * +9%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=220, last 2 years)
78727 MIPS +25%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
62953 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
59929 MIPS -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS -13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
54224 MIPS -14%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=220, last 2 years)
6162 MIPS +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
5907 MIPS
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
5756 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
5570 MIPS -6%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=225, last 2 years)
13878 Points +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
13515 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
12157 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
11887 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points -40%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=225, last 2 years)
1819 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
1733 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
1691 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points -25%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=221, last 2 years)
21.6 fps +32%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.4 fps
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.3 fps -1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps -7%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
9.06 fps -45%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * -95%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * -82%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
50.7 s * -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=217, last 2 years)
49.5 s * -4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
47.4 s *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
46.1 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * -14%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.473 sec * -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=220, last 2 years)
0.4685 sec * -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4679 sec * -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * -2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4533 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
15298
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
17026 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
130.14 fps
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit
131.96 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2384 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
200 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.8 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
263 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
98.1 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
81.7 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
69.8 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
68.7 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
61 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
54.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=216, last 2 years)
19277 KRay/s +153%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s +91%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
12734 KRay/s +67%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s +42%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7897 KRay/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
7632 KRay/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=216, last 2 years)
96689 Points +162%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points +149%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
63563 Points +72%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points +43%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
36924 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
36879 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=216, last 2 years)
4437 MB/s +68%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s +19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s +16%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
2892 MB/s +9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2696 MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
2645 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=216, last 2 years)
110843 Points +12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points 0%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
98875 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
98756 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points -1%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
92646 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=216, last 2 years)
12357 Points +31%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
9397 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9061 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
8567 Points -9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points +136%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=216, last 2 years)
49132 Points +129%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
31113 Points +45%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points +30%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21882 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
21413 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s +120%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=216, last 2 years)
108767 MB/s +93%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s +51%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
65597 MB/s +16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
56534 MB/s 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
56481 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s -12%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=216, last 2 years)
1235 MB/s +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s +3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
969 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
945 MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
919 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=216, last 2 years)
10415 KRay/s +132%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s +71%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
6747 KRay/s +50%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s +33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
4681 KRay/s +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
4491 KRay/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s -13%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
38760 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=217, last 2 years)
37372 MPixel/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
35147 MPixel/s -9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -14%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s -15%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s -49%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19573 MPixel/s -50%

System performance

In terms of system performance, the 16-inch laptop took third place in our comparison with an excellent score of 6,830 in PCMark. Based on our subjective impression, the operating system is responsive and smooth.

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=192, last 2 years)
7617 Points +12%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points +5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
6846 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (6830 - 6845, n=2)
6838 Points 0%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6830 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6651 Points -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points -12%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
11116 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (10529 - 11116, n=2)
10823 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=191, last 2 years)
10746 Points -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points -6%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
10172 Points -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9784 Points -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=191, last 2 years)
9750 Points +34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points +27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9119 Points +26%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9098 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
7260 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (7070 - 7260, n=2)
7165 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=191, last 2 years)
11548 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  (10714 - 11691, n=2)
11203 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
10714 Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
9409 Points -12%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
8950 Points -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=165, last 2 years)
1882 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1881 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1810 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1740 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points
CrossMark / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1795 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=165, last 2 years)
1790 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1766 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1651 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=165, last 2 years)
2051 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1952 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1916 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1886 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A730M
  ()
1923 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1724 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=165, last 2 years)
1700 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1523 Points
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points
PCMark 10 Score
6830 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
61237 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=216, last 2 years)
60169 MB/s -2%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
54375 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -12%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s -14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
41426 MB/s -32%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
65324 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 90647, n=216, last 2 years)
64226 MB/s -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
62046 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -12%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
43175 MB/s -34%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=216, last 2 years)
62267 MB/s +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Core i7-12700H, A730M
59407 MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s -3%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
57432 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49644 MB/s -16%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
94.7 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=213, last 2 years)
88.7 ns *
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns *
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC latency

As is so often the case with laptops, the Major X10 has some issues with latency. According to LatencyMon, the laptop is only suitable for real-time audio and video processing to a limited extent.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * -36%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * -23%
Medion Erazer Major X10
A730M, i7-12700H, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
1710.5 μs *
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1038 μs * +39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
989.5 μs * +42%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

The Major X10 houses an NVMe SSD with above-average speed that will make the competitors nervous. It has excellent sequential read and write speed of over 5,000 MB/s and 4,000 MB/s respectively (obtained using AS SSD Benchmark). There is also a second PCIe M.2 slot for you to conveniently expand the storage if required in future.

Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7091 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 4708 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1043 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 763.9 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3442 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3125 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 83.61 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 319.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
91 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
73 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
70.2 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
56.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
49.3 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
36.9 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4572 (1938.92min - 4572max) MB/s +28%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3582 (3181.8min - 3581.9max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=191, last 2 years)
3498 MB/s -2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2746 (2728.19min - 2745.84max) MB/s -23%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2355 (2335.33min - 2354.8max) MB/s -34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s -50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1780 (1752.32min - 1780.06max) MB/s -50%
seq write
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4434 (4418.88min - 4433.95max) MB/s +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=191, last 2 years)
3752 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3714 (3600.39min - 3714.27max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2786 (2776.21min - 2785.86max) MB/s -25%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2643 (2559.24min - 2642.87max) MB/s -29%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2020 (1893.72min - 2020.34max) MB/s -46%
seq q8 t1 read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
6976 (5599.73min - 6976.39max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6792 (6372.24min - 6792.05max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=191, last 2 years)
6277 MB/s -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s -50%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3515 (2963.07min - 3514.83max) MB/s -50%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3503 (3178.09min - 3503.42max) MB/s -50%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2569 (2176.89min - 2569.43max) MB/s -63%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5091 (5070.42min - 5091.14max) MB/s +2%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
5011 (4994.03min - 5010.93max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=191, last 2 years)
4722 MB/s -6%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3016 (2902.04min - 3015.7max) MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
3012 (2669.05min - 3012.29max) MB/s -40%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2752 (2520.98min - 2752.46max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
90.4 (89.34min - 90.39max) MB/s +7%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
84.3 (83.89min - 84.32max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=191, last 2 years)
67.4 MB/s -20%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
62.7 (61.51min - 62.72max) MB/s -26%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
48.8 (47.91min - 48.76max) MB/s -42%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s -61%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
32.6 (30.94min - 32.64max) MB/s -61%
4k q1 t1 write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
295 (292.45min - 295.27max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
236 (235.61min - 236.11max) MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=191, last 2 years)
223 MB/s -24%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
216 (185.22min - 215.93max) MB/s -27%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
162.6 (156.2min - 162.6max) MB/s -45%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
144 (143.57min - 144.35max) MB/s -51%
4k q32 t16 read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3551 (3538.39min - 3550.66max) MB/s
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2780 (2665.55min - 2779.85max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=191, last 2 years)
2587 MB/s -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s -38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2214 (2192.88min - 2214.37max) MB/s -38%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1798 (1787.41min - 1797.64max) MB/s -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
652 (637.52min - 651.63max) MB/s -82%
4k q32 t16 write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3398 (3342.89min - 3398.03max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2307 (2258.85min - 2307.29max) MB/s -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2249 (2140.07min - 2249.23max) MB/s -34%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2142 (2133.48min - 2142.48max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=191, last 2 years)
2139 MB/s -37%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
408 (386.27min - 408.12max) MB/s -88%
AS SSD
Score Total
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
8906 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=179, last 2 years)
6792 Points -24%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5866 Points -34%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5514 Points -38%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4577 Points -49%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2529 Points -72%
Score Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3464 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=179, last 2 years)
2486 Points -28%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2363 Points -32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2182 Points -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2121 Points -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1190 Points -66%
Score Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
3707 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=179, last 2 years)
3101 Points -16%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2325 Points -37%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2324 Points -37%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1450 Points -61%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
762 Points -79%
Seq Read
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5367 MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
5200.42 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=179, last 2 years)
4892 MB/s -6%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3148 MB/s -39%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
2693.29 MB/s -48%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2656 MB/s -49%
Seq Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
4309.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=179, last 2 years)
3616 MB/s -16%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2565 MB/s -40%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2535 MB/s -41%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1904 MB/s -56%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
1683.46 MB/s -61%
4K Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
97.3 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=179, last 2 years)
66.4 MB/s -32%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
65.01 MB/s -33%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
53.97 MB/s -45%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
52.1 MB/s -46%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
28.83 MB/s -70%
4K Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
294.39 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=179, last 2 years)
210 MB/s -29%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
203.81 MB/s -31%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
197.81 MB/s -33%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
136.8 MB/s -54%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
59 MB/s -80%
4K-64 Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2846.23 MB/s
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1996 MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=179, last 2 years)
1925 MB/s -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1827 MB/s -36%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1591.21 MB/s -44%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
855.48 MB/s -70%
4K-64 Write
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
2981.55 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=179, last 2 years)
2532 MB/s -15%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2011 MB/s -33%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1931 MB/s -35%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1055.78 MB/s -65%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
395.8 MB/s -87%
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.086 ms *
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.078 ms * +9%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.075 ms * +13%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.066 ms * +23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.057 ms * +34%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=178, last 2 years)
0.0546 ms * +37%
Access Time Write
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNS512G
0.06 ms * -362%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
0.059 ms * -354%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=179, last 2 years)
0.04747 ms * -265%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.027 ms * -108%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.021 ms * -62%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R
0.013 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Medion Erazer Major X10: Ø6972 (5977.93-7028.19)

Graphics card

We have come to the most interesting part about the Major X10: its graphics card. This is the very first time that an Intel Arc A730M (24 Xe cores and 24 Ray Tracing Units) has landed on our testbench. The Intel GPU is a great performer when it comes to synthetic graphics benchmarks. In 3DMark tests, it significantly outperforms the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti and is on the same level as the GeForce RTX 3060 and Radeon RX 6600M. With Turbo mode enabled, the Medion laptop was able to get almost 20% more performance out of the GPU and speed past the other devices in our comparison. More benchmark results can be found on our page about the Arc A730M.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
100 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
77.3 pt
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1!
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
75.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
75.1 pt
Average Intel Arc A730M
 
68.3 pt
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
67.6 pt
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
65.7 pt
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
45.2 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=220, last 2 years)
40982 Points +53%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
31859 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
31466 Points +17%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
30335 Points +13%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (24928 - 31551, n=4)
28692 Points +7%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
28009 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
26822 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
18679 Points -30%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=225, last 2 years)
29766 Points +48%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
24460 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
23109 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
22409 Points +11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
21574 Points +7%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (19850 - 22620, n=4)
21265 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
20179 Points
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
13760 Points -32%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=222, last 2 years)
12199 Points +41%
Medion Erazer Major X10 Turbo Mode
Intel Arc A730M
10352 Points +19%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
9000 Points +4%
Average Intel Arc A730M
  (7212 - 10352, n=4)
8798 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Major X10
Intel Arc A730M
8677 Points
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-55-738R
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8342 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
8207 Points -5%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7620
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
5352 Points -38%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
Average of class Gaming