Notebookcheck Logo

HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop Review: Less is More

Not a miracle machine, but sufficient. HP's Omen 16 with AMD's Ryzen processor is sparing in its use of gaming components. Top performance thus cannot be expected, but this is not strictly necessary in the case of many popular gaming titles. Moreover, the fun does not stop upon seeing the price, even if a few weaknesses come to light in the test.

Like many current competitors, the HP Omen uses a 16-inch display. Hence the gaming notebook is reasonably portable and still offers a pleasantly large picture at the same time. Either Full HD or QHD can be selected as the resolution size. As for the processor, this comes in the form of an AMD Ryzen, of which the bandwidth ranges from Ryzen 5 to Ryzen 9.

Alongside the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070, which was used in our test for the predecessor HP Omen 16-b0085ng, there is also the AMD Radeon RX 6600M. This is what our test device uses in combination with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H. In terms of performance, the gaming notebook is roughly equivalent to an HP Victus 16 or an MSI Alpha 15, which, like the HP Omen 16, currently cost around 1,300 Euros (~$1413).

One subtle difference remains: Saving power is definitely not among its strengths. This had a few noticeable effects on our test results.

HP Omen 16-c0077ng (Omen 16 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H 8 x 3.2 - 4.4 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 134 W PL1 / Sustained, Cezanne H (Zen 3)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX 6600M - 8192 MB, Core: 2416 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR6, 30.0.15021.1001
Memory
16384 MB 
Display
16.10 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 182 PPI, BOE09E5, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, 1024 GB 
, 899 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Raven/Renoir/VanGogh/Cezanne - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: Combo Headset, Card Reader: SD Card Reader
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10MBit/s), RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26 x 370 x 245 ( = 1.02 x 14.57 x 9.65 in)
Battery
70 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HP Wide Vision 720p
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.25 kg ( = 79.37 oz / 4.96 pounds), Power Supply: 750 g ( = 26.46 oz / 1.65 pounds)
Price
1700 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

The Competition

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86 %
04/2022
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.3 kg26 mm16.10"2560x1440
82.6 %
01/2022
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
2.4 kg23.95 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.4 %
11/2021
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.1 kg29 mm15.60"1920x1080
81.4 %
12/2021
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg26 mm15.60"1920x1080
84.3 %
09/2021
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.5 mm16.10"1920x1080
86.6 %
10/2021
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23 mm16.10"1920x1080
87.4 %
08/2021
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.6 kg26.85 mm16.00"2560x1600

Case - Little shine on the HP Omen

Apart from the hinges, the notebook's exterior is made of plastic. The stability of the construction suffers as a result. While the slightly yielding keyboard frame is hardly noticeable, the large display seems a bit too bendy. In particular, opening it with one hand bends the screen unnecessarily. An aluminum cover like in many business notebooks could have helped here.

Overall, the build leaves a high-quality impression. All parts fit together nicely and have even gaps. The possibilities for torsion are limited. But HP could have made the display frame a little more rigid. The hinges also seem a little too weak so that the screen wobbles, but it can still be opened with one hand at the same time.

The iridescent logo stands out even from a distance.
The iridescent logo stands out even from a distance.
The display can be opened up to 145°.
The large fan is essential, but requires a lot of space.
Just big enough: the hinges.

The large format is due to the 16-inch display. Even the slim display edges can only compensate for this to a limited extent, so that standard laptop bags or notebook backpacks may be too tight. In terms of case thickness, the HP Omen 16 is 3 mm (~0.12 in) thicker than its predecessor. It also outperforms other gaming laptops with similar performance values due to the particularly large cooling system, which protrudes from the case in the rear area of the base.

The advantage of all the plastic is a relatively low weight of 2.25 kg (~5.0 lb). However, the 230 W power supply increases the total weight to 3 kg (~6.6 lb).

Size Comparison

370 mm / 14.6 inch 245 mm / 9.65 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.3 kg4.96 lbs369.2 mm / 14.5 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.4 kg5.22 lbs361 mm / 14.2 inch 258 mm / 10.2 inch 29 mm / 1.142 inch 2.1 kg4.7 lbs363.4 mm / 14.3 inch 255 mm / 10 inch 23.9 mm / 0.941 inch 2.3 kg5.07 lbs359 mm / 14.1 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 23.95 mm / 0.943 inch 2.4 kg5.18 lbs

Hardware - Suitable for a gaming notebook

The choice between three different monitor outputs is commendable. With USB-C, miniDP and HDMI, there is something for almost every external display. Thanks to DP 1.4 and HDMI 2.1, monitors with more than 4K resolution can also be connected.

USB ports on both the left and right of the case allow almost everything on the desk to be connected without any problems. However, the distance between the individual connections is sometimes very tight. The two USB ports on the right are only separated by a width of 4 mm (~0.16 in).

While the number of ports seems very practical, the speed of USB-A in particular is a downside. All three ports only reach 5 Gbit/s and thus only the USB 3.0 standard. At least the USB-C connection manages 10 Gbit/s, but compared to Thunderbolt 4 in particular, which is not supported here, this is only a fraction of what is currently technically possible. 

Left: power, 1 Gbit LAN, USB-A 3.0 (5 Gbit/s, HP Sleep and Charge), miniDP, HDMI, USB-C (10 Gbit/s, PD, DP), headset, SD card slot
Left: power, 1 Gbit LAN, USB-A 3.0 (5 Gbit/s, HP Sleep and Charge), miniDP, HDMI, USB-C (10 Gbit/s, PD, DP), headset, SD card slot
Right: 2x USB-A 3.0 (5 Gbit/s)
Right: 2x USB-A 3.0 (5 Gbit/s)

SD Card Reader

The card reader's speed, tested with our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference memory card, could be significantly higher. However, those who are not exactly ambitious hobby photographers will hardly notice this shortcoming.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H (AV Pro V60)
201 MB/s ∼100% +190%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=94, last 2 years)
116.1 MB/s ∼58% +68%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
75 MB/s ∼37% +8%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
69.2 MB/s ∼34%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
19.8 MB/s ∼10% -71%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD
Intel Core i5-11400H (AV Pro V60)
206 MB/s ∼100% +156%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=87, last 2 years)
135 MB/s ∼66% +68%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
80.5 MB/s ∼39%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s ∼37% -4%
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
26.9 MB/s ∼13% -67%

Communication

In addition to the LAN port, Wi-Fi 6 is also available. Like in the HP Victus 16, a Realtek WLAN card is used here, which, in our tests, was roughly average for this kind of hardware. But since the HP Omen 16 is in the entry-level segment of gaming notebooks, this should suffice. However, a look at the average of all the gaming laptops in our review shows that the throughput rates are usually much higher.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1424 (731min - 1507max) MBit/s ∼100% +58%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=151, last 2 years)
1167 MBit/s ∼82% +29%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1115 (720min - 827max) MBit/s ∼78% +23%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1084 (531min - 1102max) MBit/s ∼76% +20%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
967 (471min - 1048max) MBit/s ∼68% +7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
928 (483min - 1003max) MBit/s ∼65% +3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
904 (492min - 1037max) MBit/s ∼63% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
904 (826min - 950max) MBit/s ∼63%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (424 - 928, n=20)
787 MBit/s ∼55% -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1665 (857min - 1700max) MBit/s ∼100% +131%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1487 (1350min - 1522max) MBit/s ∼89% +107%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=151, last 2 years)
1236 MBit/s ∼74% +72%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1052 (986min - 1142max) MBit/s ∼63% +46%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
992 (835min - 956max) MBit/s ∼60% +38%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
928 (868min - 988max) MBit/s ∼56% +29%
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
  (621 - 877, n=20)
745 MBit/s ∼45% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
732 (376min - 763max) MBit/s ∼44% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE
720 (664min - 751max) MBit/s ∼43%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500Tooltip
HP Omen 16-c0077ng RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø720 (664-751)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1445 (1383-1538)
HP Omen 16-c0077ng RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø904 (826-950)
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX507ZM Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1045 (936-1115)

Webcam

The resolution and color accuracy of the HP Omen 16 webcam meet the minimum requirements at best, though this is common practice in this segment.

ColorChecker
21.4 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
30.4 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
19.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
18 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 16-c0077ng: 18.72 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.42 ∆E

Maintenance

No hidden screws, no firmly anchored plastic clips: After loosening the eight screws, a little finesse is required to remove the base plate. But a flat pry tool never hurts.

Afterwards, all crucial spots are easily accessible for cleaning the ventilation or changing the battery, which is screwed at six points. Two RAM slots are available for upgrading possibilities. Another NVMe SSD can be inserted into the unequipped M.2 slot. The WLAN module, which is installed a little too close to the heat pipe for our taste, can also be replaced.

Input devices - Gaming keyboard glows colorfully


Four zones can be color adjusted.
Four zones can be color adjusted.

Keyboard

The keyboard appears to be completely geared towards gaming. Even if the downstroke of only 1 mm seems shallow for demanding users, the non-slip surface and the appropriate distance between the keys ensure fast and accurate input. Instead of the number field on the right side, there are arrow keys that have been given a lot of space. Unfortunately, the arrangement directly above it looks a little chaotic, which is initially particularly irritating. The "Delete" and "Power" keys aren't exactly where we'd expect them to be. The quick access to the Omen Gaming Hub with power control, color control and other practical extras for games is conspicuously placed.

The keyboard lighting is very nice to look at. Here, however, some things have been cut back. There are only four zones available, which can shine in 18 different colors. Only after installing Omen Light Studio are a few additional motion profiles added, which are generally oriented towards sound playback or the contents of the display. Due to the limited color selection and the fact that only four colors are shown at a time, the effects appear rudimentary. The static display with the separate "WASD" keys, on the other hand, looks good.

One workmanship flaw in our test device should not go unmentioned. The "Caps Lock" key sits crookedly. This is especially noticeable when the backlight is on, even though the button's function does not seem to be affected.

No numpad, but room for arrow keys and the Omen Gaming Hub.
No numpad, but room for arrow keys and the Omen Gaming Hub.
Caps Lock is mounted crookedly.
Caps Lock is mounted crookedly.

Touchpad

In all likelihood, one is likely to use the HP Omen 16 with a separate mouse. But the touchpad is quite convincing. It responds promptly and the matte yet smooth surface allows for precise control, even with multiple fingers. Of course, a few buttons below would have been even better, but uninteresting for full-blooded gamers with oscillating gaming mice anyway.

Display - HP also keeping demanding gamers in mind

A very faint halo can be observed in the lower right corner.
A very faint halo can be observed in the lower right corner.

In addition to the QHD display with 2,560 by 1,440 pixels used here, HP also offers a Full HD panel with a diagonal screen measurement of 16.1 inches for the Omen 16. Due to its size, the choice of a higher resolution seems reasonable since the screen looks like a 27-inch desktop monitor that also stands 27 inches away. Furthermore, the Full HD version only offers 144 hertz, whereas the larger variant offers 165 hertz. Whether this difference is actually perceptible is another question altogether.

Compared to the predecessor or competitor models Omen 16-b085ng or Victus 16, HP has lowered the peak brightness from 400 to 300 cd/m². When used on a desk and away from brightly lit workstations, the difference should hardly be noticeable. On the other hand, the even illumination is a positive note, and screen bleeding is also less noticeable due to the lowered brightness. In our test model, there was only a minimal abnormality in the bottom right corner. 

As in the other HP models, we could not determine PWM flickering. There was also nothing to fault in terms of response times. Many other gaming notebooks are also around 10 ms.

295
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
276
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
297
cd/m²
291
cd/m²
279
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
286
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09E5
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 297 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 282.8 cd/m² Minimum: 11.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1350:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.25 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 6.97 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Panda LM156LF-2F03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00
Display
-5%
-5%
-41%
4%
4%
3%
Display P3 Coverage
68.8
65.9
-4%
64.5
-6%
39.7
-42%
72.6
6%
72.3
5%
sRGB Coverage
96.9
91.6
-5%
95.9
-1%
59.7
-38%
100
3%
99.5
3%
99
2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.1
67
-6%
65.8
-7%
41.1
-42%
73.5
3%
73.8
4%
73
3%
Response Times
44%
-16%
-208%
-9%
7%
41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
13 ?(6, 7)
5.06 ?(2.5, 2.56)
61%
15
-15%
40.4 ?(18.4, 22)
-211%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
26%
8 ?(4.2, 3.8)
38%
9.2 ?(3, 6.2)
29%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(5, 5)
7.44 ?(3.76, 3.68)
26%
11.6
-16%
30.4 ?(16.4, 14)
-204%
14.4 ?(8.4, 6)
-44%
12.4 ?(6.6, 5.8)
-24%
4.8
52%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-20%
-2%
-49%
4%
-26%
14%
Brightness middle
297
311
5%
393
32%
283
-5%
361
22%
405
36%
551
86%
Brightness
283
325
15%
353
25%
266
-6%
341
20%
378
34%
523
85%
Brightness Distribution
91
84
-8%
83
-9%
85
-7%
88
-3%
87
-4%
88
-3%
Black Level *
0.22
0.22
-0%
0.47
-114%
0.2
9%
0.3
-36%
0.34
-55%
0.54
-145%
Contrast
1350
1414
5%
836
-38%
1415
5%
1203
-11%
1191
-12%
1020
-24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.25
5.06
-56%
2.84
13%
5.32
-64%
2.44
25%
3.7
-14%
1.8
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.33
8.37
-32%
7.15
-13%
17.68
-179%
6.37
-1%
7.77
-23%
2.53
60%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.11
2.62
-136%
0.67
40%
3.94
-255%
1.26
-14%
3.49
-214%
1.66
-50%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.97
4.8
31%
3.73
46%
2.9
58%
4.6
34%
5.88
16%
1.85
73%
Gamma
2.3 96%
2.12 104%
2.53 87%
2.062 107%
2.268 97%
2.57 86%
2.3 96%
CCT
6050 107%
8002 81%
7312 89%
7167 91%
6609 98%
6342 102%
6338 103%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
73.76
72.81
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.47
99.41
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / -7%
-8% / -5%
-99% / -70%
-0% / 2%
-5% / -15%
19% / 16%

* ... smaller is better

The display delivers good pictures with a good contrast and a very low black value. Unfortunately, the factory settings are not quite optimal so that a slight yellowish tint can be observed. After calibration (the corresponding profile is available for download above the table), color deviations should no longer be visible to the naked eye.

Since the display is not intended for professional users, it offers adequate color reproduction with almost 100 percent coverage of the sRGB color space.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
97% coverage of sRGB
97% coverage of sRGB
69% coverage of DCI-P3
69% coverage of DCI-P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5 ms rise
↘ 5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

With 300 cd/m², the Omen 16 should only be used outdoors in an emergency. Gaming in particular is not very appealing because colors are much less visible. But texts and simple graphics remain legible even in direct sunlight. The matte display surface makes its contribution here. In contrast, the brightness is more than sufficient indoors, especially since the very low black value of 0.22 cd/m² ensures a high contrast.

Text under direct sunglight
Text under direct sunglight
Image under backlight
Image under backlight

The IPS panel is stable at the usual viewing angles. Color changes cannot be detected even at acute angles. However, the brightness decreases noticeably from about 70 to 80°, although this is hardly a practical viewing angle.

Performance - HP focuses on power

With the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M in our HP Omen 16, there is sufficient power for current games. 16 GB of RAM should almost always suffice and can be easily expanded later. However, the limits of the notebook are tested when the system is made to run at 165 fps on the QHD display. 60 fps on the other hand seems to be almost effortlessly achievable in many games.

To stretch these limits as far as possible, we selected the "Performance" option in the Omen Gaming Hub, which increases the power supply to the processor by almost 20%.

Processor

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has almost unlimited power consumption. For fractions of a second, it can consume 160 W. For longer periods of time, 134 W is the standard. Both values are, for example, significantly higher than the settings found in the MSI Alpha 15 with an identical CPU.

However, a larger performance leap could not be determined. At least the normally inexpensive CPU can compete with an Intel Core i7-11800 or i7-12800H, albeit at the expense of efficiency. The effects of the increased power consumption are not really visible in our benchmarks. The Omen 16 is mostly in the midfield in the various ratings, closely surrounded by the competition. All that can be said is that the processor gives everything that it is capable of.

What is really striking is the lack of a drop in the values in the Cinebench loop, which usually prevents the system from overheating. The HP Omen 16 simply ramps up its ventilation to maximum, which then counteracts any drops in performance.

Cinebench R15 multi sustained load

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
HP Omen 16-c0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2015 (1981.18-2029.63)
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1973 (1963.86-1985.21)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2073 (2055.92-2084.96)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2126 (2093.8-2147.31)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
83.2 pt ∼83%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
81.1 pt ∼81%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
79.2 pt ∼79%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
78.7 pt ∼79%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
76.4 pt ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
76.2 pt ∼76%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
75.6 pt ∼76%
Average of class Gaming
 
75.2 pt ∼75%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
68.1 pt ∼68%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12817 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11938 Points ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12738 Points ∼99% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12663 Points ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
12409 Points ∼97% +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 19282, n=173, last 2 years)
12293 Points ∼96% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12173 Points ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12083 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (8812 - 13214, n=26)
11897 Points ∼93% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10097 Points ∼79% -17%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
1511 Points ∼100% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=172, last 2 years)
1490 Points ∼99% +5%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1432 Points ∼95% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1427 Points ∼94% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1415 Points ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1294 - 1441, n=26)
1410 Points ∼93% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1407 Points ∼93% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1374 Points ∼91% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1294 Points ∼86% -9%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4982 Points ∼100% +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4611 Points ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4946 Points ∼99% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4913 Points ∼99% +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
4831 Points ∼97% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4726 Points ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4663 Points ∼94% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (3430 - 5020, n=28)
4604 Points ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 7382, n=229, last 2 years)
4404 Points ∼88% -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4172 Points ∼84% -12%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
558 Points ∼95% +1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
558 Points ∼95% +1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼95% +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 740, n=229, last 2 years)
554 Points ∼95% +1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
551 Points ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (502 - 560, n=27)
550 Points ∼94% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
529 Points ∼90% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
502 Points ∼86% -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
2147 (2093.8min - 2147.31max) Points ∼100% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2095 (2082.79min - 2095.01max) Points ∼98% +3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2093 (2069.32min - 2093.04max) Points ∼97% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2085 (2055.92min - 2084.96max) Points ∼97% +3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2030 (1981.18min - 2029.63max) Points ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1985 (1963.86min - 1985.21max) Points ∼92% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1487 - 2119, n=25)
1984 Points ∼92% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1982 (1952.36min - 1982.46max) Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3077, n=238, last 2 years)
1857 Points ∼86% -9%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
231 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
230 Points ∼100% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
209 Points ∼90% -9%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (209 - 234, n=26)
229 Points ∼99% 0%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
228 Points ∼99% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 277, n=228, last 2 years)
221 Points ∼96% -3%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
296 Seconds * ∼100% -18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (237 - 340, n=26)
258 Seconds * ∼87% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
257 Seconds * ∼87% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
256 Seconds * ∼86% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
255 Seconds * ∼86% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * ∼82% +3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
251.8 Seconds * ∼85%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
244 Seconds * ∼82% +3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
241 Seconds * ∼81% +4%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Seconds * ∼76% +10%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
58467 MIPS ∼100%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56716 MIPS ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56682 MIPS ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56187 MIPS ∼96%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56348 MIPS ∼96%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
54903 MIPS ∼94%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54228 MIPS ∼93%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47854 - 59986, n=26)
52243 MIPS ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 83533, n=228, last 2 years)
49811 MIPS ∼85%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0 MIPS ∼0%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
5674 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS ∼99% +3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5575 MIPS ∼98% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5508 MIPS ∼97% +2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5502 MIPS ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5497 MIPS ∼97% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5038 MIPS ∼89% -7%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5038 - 5632, n=26)
5479 MIPS ∼97% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5423 MIPS ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=228, last 2 years)
5412 MIPS ∼95% 0%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
9261 Points ∼100% +26%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 14294, n=221, last 2 years)
8426 Points ∼91% +15%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8389 Points ∼91% +15%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8266 Points ∼89% +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8244 Points ∼89% +13%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7993 Points ∼86% +9%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7899 Points ∼85% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (6551 - 9062, n=25)
7749 Points ∼84% +6%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7392 Points ∼80% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7326 Points ∼79%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
1588 Points ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1501 Points ∼95% +12%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1492 Points ∼94% +12%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1472 Points ∼93% +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1933, n=221, last 2 years)
1449 Points ∼91% +8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (1336 - 1505, n=25)
1448 Points ∼91% +8%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1436 Points ∼90% +7%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1393 Points ∼88% +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1347 Points ∼85% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1336 Points ∼84%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
16.6 fps ∼100% +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
16.1 fps ∼97% +6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.7 fps ∼89% -3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps ∼94% +3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps ∼92% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.2 fps ∼92%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps ∼91% -1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps ∼91% -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (11.6 - 16.1, n=26)
14.6 fps ∼88% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 22.5, n=230, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼84% -9%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
99.9 s * ∼100% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.9 s * ∼57% +38%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
92.3 s * ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (47.4 - 113, n=26)
65.3 s * ∼65% +29%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.7 s * ∼57% +39%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
56.4 s * ∼56% +39%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
55.9 s * ∼56% +39%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s * ∼54% +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=225, last 2 years)
53.3 s * ∼53% +42%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s * ∼46% +50%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.565 sec * ∼100% -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.559 sec * ∼99% -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.524 sec * ∼93% -2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * ∼98% -8%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (0.511 - 0.559, n=25)
0.525 sec * ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.522 sec * ∼92% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.52 sec * ∼92% -1%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼92% -0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.516 sec * ∼91%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼91% +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2030 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
143 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97.6 pt ∼98%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
96.7 pt ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
95 pt ∼95%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
94.8 pt ∼95%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94.3 pt ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
 
92.1 pt ∼92%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
89.2 pt ∼89%
Average of class Gaming
 
79.1 pt ∼79%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14805 KRay/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14349 KRay/s ∼97% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14775 KRay/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14725 KRay/s ∼99% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14590 KRay/s ∼99%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
14273 KRay/s ∼96% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14203 KRay/s ∼96% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (10349 - 15169, n=26)
14075 KRay/s ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=183, last 2 years)
11305 KRay/s ∼76% -23%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94920 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
94497 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94054 Points ∼99% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
89066 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
91947 Points ∼97%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
89725 Points ∼95% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
89240 Points ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (63663 - 95954, n=26)
88290 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=183, last 2 years)
61308 Points ∼65% -33%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3230 MB/s ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3209 MB/s ∼99% +2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3048 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3164 MB/s ∼98% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3142 MB/s ∼97%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3049 MB/s ∼94% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
3049 MB/s ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (2096 - 3287, n=26)
3004 MB/s ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 4851, n=183, last 2 years)
2842 MB/s ∼88% -10%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
99215 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
97488 Points ∼98% -2%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96679 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
96626 Points ∼97% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (92948 - 99215, n=26)
96135 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
96014 Points ∼97% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
93649 Points ∼94% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
92948 Points ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=183, last 2 years)
89257 Points ∼90% -10%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11831 Points ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11821 Points ∼100% 0%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11782 Points ∼100% 0%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
11722 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
11629 Points ∼98% -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (9962 - 11871, n=26)
11550 Points ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11409 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11398 Points ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=183, last 2 years)
9865 Points ∼83% -17%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52168 Points ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52072 Points ∼100% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
51892 Points ∼99% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
49017 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
50615 Points ∼97%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
49254 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49016 Points ∼94% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (36083 - 52732, n=26)
48477 Points ∼93% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=183, last 2 years)
33405 Points ∼64% -34%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
125127 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
124083 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
119353 MB/s ∼95% -4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
124070 MB/s ∼99%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
121180 MB/s ∼97% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
119953 MB/s ∼96% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (50226 - 127832, n=26)
114873 MB/s ∼92% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 166300, n=183, last 2 years)
77043 MB/s ∼62% -38%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
50226 MB/s ∼40% -60%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
811 MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
803 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
802 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
795 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
783 MB/s ∼97% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
789 MB/s ∼97% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
783 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (591 - 828, n=26)
775 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1209, n=204, last 2 years)
690 MB/s ∼85% -15%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7871 KRay/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7826 KRay/s ∼99% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7665 KRay/s ∼97%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7644 KRay/s ∼97% 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7488 KRay/s ∼95% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
7526 KRay/s ∼96% -2%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
7469 KRay/s ∼95% -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (5457 - 7884, n=26)
7416 KRay/s ∼94% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=183, last 2 years)
6131 KRay/s ∼78% -20%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=183, last 2 years)
24624 MPixel/s ∼100% +24%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
20495 MPixel/s ∼83% +3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
20026 MPixel/s ∼81% +1%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
19344 MPixel/s ∼79% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19952 MPixel/s ∼81% 0%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
19911 MPixel/s ∼81%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
19901 MPixel/s ∼81% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (14445 - 25421, n=26)
17573 MPixel/s ∼71% -12%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
14445 MPixel/s ∼59% -27%

System Performance

Similarly to its predecessor, system performance is convincing in view of the direct competition. Taking into account possible fluctuations in the measurements, the Omen 16 is roughly on par with its competitors and is always near the top. The creation and editing of images and videos even scores above average. Models with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 cannot quite keep up here.

PCMark 10 / Score
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
7231 Points ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7150 Points ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (6875 - 7150, n=2)
7013 Points ∼97% -2%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
6875 Points ∼95% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6717 Points ∼93% -6%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
6703 Points ∼93% -6%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
6665 Points ∼92% -7%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
6567 Points ∼91% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=189, last 2 years)
6550 Points ∼91% -8%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10735 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10479 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (9907 - 10479, n=2)
10193 Points ∼95% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9943 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9907 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9905 Points ∼92% -5%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
9867 Points ∼92% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=188, last 2 years)
9859 Points ∼92% -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9548 Points ∼89% -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9231 Points ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (8922 - 9231, n=2)
9077 Points ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
8935 Points ∼97% -3%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8923 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
8922 Points ∼97% -3%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
8890 Points ∼96% -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8866 Points ∼96% -4%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
8798 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=188, last 2 years)
8746 Points ∼95% -5%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
10700 Points ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
10257 Points ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (9977 - 10257, n=2)
10117 Points ∼95% -1%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
9977 Points ∼93% -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
9715 Points ∼91% -5%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
9377 Points ∼88% -9%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
9161 Points ∼86% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=188, last 2 years)
8964 Points ∼84% -13%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8660 Points ∼81% -16%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=32, last 2 years)
1741 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1309 Points ∼75%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1302 - 1309, n=3)
1305 Points ∼75%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=32, last 2 years)
1692 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1285 Points ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1284 - 1285, n=3)
1285 Points ∼76%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=32, last 2 years)
1823 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1401 Points ∼77%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1384 - 1401, n=3)
1391 Points ∼76%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=32, last 2 years)
1671 Points ∼100%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1129 Points ∼68%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M
  (1116 - 1136, n=3)
1127 Points ∼67%
PCMark 10 Score
7150 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=183, last 2 years)
43238 MB/s ∼100% +4%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41377 MB/s ∼96%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (34964 - 44180, n=26)
39582 MB/s ∼92% -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=183, last 2 years)
46990 MB/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
46645 MB/s ∼99%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (39990 - 47260, n=26)
44780 MB/s ∼95% -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=183, last 2 years)
45078 MB/s ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
41254 MB/s ∼92%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (28456 - 47022, n=26)
37755 MB/s ∼84% -8%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M
86.6 ns * ∼100%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
  (76.3 - 105.1, n=26)
82 ns * ∼95% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (0 - 122, n=207, last 2 years)
60.1 ns * ∼69% +31%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

Only three skipped frames when playing video in 4K is a decent result. The measured latencies, on the other hand, show that the tuning of the drivers does not seem to be optimal. With just under 2 ms, the HP Omen 16 takes the lead in the ranking, which is unfortunately the worst result. But it should be kept in mind that other comparable gaming notebooks are also unconvincing in this category.

YouTube stream in 4K
YouTube stream in 4K
LatencyMon main
LatencyMon main
LatencyMon drivers
LatencyMon drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2098 μs * ∼100%
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
1550 μs * ∼74% +26%
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
1330 μs * ∼63% +37%
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1161 μs * ∼55% +45%
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1154 μs * ∼55% +45%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Radeon RX 6600M, R7 5800H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
1010 μs * ∼48% +52%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
698 μs * ∼33% +67%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The installed NVMe SSD Samsung PM981a, like in many other notebooks, was able to fully demonstrate its capacities. Almost all recorded values are above average, which also explains why, in our table of hard drives and SSDs, this SSD is found high at the top of our table.

The SSD would be even faster via PCIe 4.0, but this is not supported by the AMD processor. The connection on the motherboard itself would even be capable of this. But this feature does not play a significant role in the performance of this system.

Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Sequential Read: 3148MB/s
Sequential Write: 2565MB/s
4K Read: 52.1MB/s
4K Write: 136.8MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1996MB/s
4K-64 Write: 1931MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.066ms
Access Time Write: 0.027ms
Score Read: 2363Points
Score Write: 2325Points
Score Total: 5866Points
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS
Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW)
Medion Erazer Deputy P25
Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
HP Victus 16-e0179ng
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H)
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE)
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
93.9
67.6
-28%
69.9
-26%
66.4
-29%
87.5
-7%
18.1
-81%
54.6
-42%
83.2
-11%
89.5
-5%
AS SSD
-31%
-24%
-36%
-6%
-163%
-151%
-14%
-17%
Score Total
5866
3300
-44%
3394
-42%
3329
-43%
5503
-6%
910
-84%
3636
-38%
4826 ?(3309 - 6095, n=37)
-18%
5243 ?(910 - 9279, n=176, last 2 years)
-11%
Score Read
2363
1157
-51%
1612
-32%
1574
-33%
2017
-15%
389
-84%
1493
-37%
1786 ?(1078 - 2449, n=37)
-24%
1954 ?(389 - 3587, n=176, last 2 years)
-17%
Score Write
2325
1546
-34%
1007
-57%
1000
-57%
2452
5%
338
-85%
1397
-40%
2144 ?(1471 - 2527, n=37)
-8%
2310 ?(335 - 4414, n=176, last 2 years)
-1%
Seq Read
3148
2016
-36%
2589
-18%
2844
-10%
2383
-24%
925
-71%
2695
-14%
2553 ?(1938 - 3148, n=37)
-19%
3194 ?(252 - 6562, n=176, last 2 years)
1%
Seq Write
2565
1830
-29%
1435
-44%
1779
-31%
2466
-4%
496
-81%
2384
-7%
2084 ?(1248 - 2837, n=37)
-19%
2472 ?(308 - 7663, n=176, last 2 years)
-4%
4K Read
52.1
55.2
6%
53.6
3%
42.9
-18%
44.14
-15%
19.99
-62%
29.75
-43%
53.1 ?(44.3 - 68.4, n=37)
2%
55.2 ?(20 - 108, n=176, last 2 years)
6%
4K Write
136.8
127.7
-7%
154.2
13%
130.7
-4%
117.5
-14%
17.96
-87%
52
-62%
131.2 ?(87.4 - 208, n=37)
-4%
150.2 ?(18 - 364, n=176, last 2 years)
10%
4K-64 Read
1996
901
-55%
1299
-35%
1246
-38%
1734
-13%
276.2
-86%
1193
-40%
1477 ?(762 - 2093, n=37)
-26%
1579 ?(216 - 2959, n=176, last 2 years)
-21%
4K-64 Write
1931
1235
-36%
710
-63%
692
-64%
2088
8%
270.2
-86%
1107
-43%
1805 ?(1074 - 2152, n=37)
-7%
1923 ?(191.8 - 3859, n=176, last 2 years)
0%
Access Time Read *
0.066
0.087
-32%
0.056
15%
0.089
-35%
0.049
26%
0.23
-248%
0.136
-106%
0.04983 ?(0.032 - 0.087, n=36)
24%
0.06431 ?(0.018 - 0.23, n=169, last 2 years)
3%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.032
-19%
0.027
-0%
0.043
-59%
0.032
-19%
0.249
-822%
0.36
-1233%
0.04222 ?(0.017 - 0.128, n=37)
-56%
0.06954 ?(0.012 - 0.588, n=176, last 2 years)
-158%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-30% / -30%
-25% / -24%
-33% / -35%
-7% / -7%
-122% / -156%
-97% / -142%
-13% / -14%
-11% / -16%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

018036054072090010801260144016201800198021602340252027002880306032403420Tooltip
HP Omen 16-c0077ng Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3535 (3326.44-3565.79)
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD: Ø1469 (269.9-1640.05)
Schenker XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW): Ø2984 (2805.94-2994.62)

GPU Performance

The AMD Radeon RX 6600M is one of the entry-level cards and is roughly on par with a Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060. The AMD card offers larger video memory, so it should be able to handle more demanding titles somewhat better.

Unlike the processor, however, the Omen 16 does not supply the GPU with additional power, but only with a maximum of 115 W. In some gaming laptops such as the Schenker XMG Apex 15, the card is supplied with a maximum of 130 W by Nvidia.

In battery mode, HP has even limited power consumption to just 25 W. Without a permanent power supply, gaming is only possible to a limited extent.

3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Time Spy
3DMark Fire Strike - maximum performance
3DMark Fire Strike - maximum performance
3DMark Fire Strike - battery mode
3DMark Fire Strike - battery mode
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) -3!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
100 pt ∼100%
HP Omen 16-b0085ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
98.9 pt ∼99%
HP Omen 16-c0077ng
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
87.7 pt ∼88%
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M
 
87.5 pt ∼88%
Average of class Gaming
 
83.3 pt ∼83%
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008
AMD Radeon RX 6600M, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H