HP Omen 16 Gaming Laptop Review: Less is More
Like many current competitors, the HP Omen uses a 16-inch display. Hence the gaming notebook is reasonably portable and still offers a pleasantly large picture at the same time. Either Full HD or QHD can be selected as the resolution size. As for the processor, this comes in the form of an AMD Ryzen, of which the bandwidth ranges from Ryzen 5 to Ryzen 9.
Alongside the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070, which was used in our test for the predecessor HP Omen 16-b0085ng, there is also the AMD Radeon RX 6600M. This is what our test device uses in combination with the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H. In terms of performance, the gaming notebook is roughly equivalent to an HP Victus 16 or an MSI Alpha 15, which, like the HP Omen 16, currently cost around 1,300 Euros (~$1413).
One subtle difference remains: Saving power is definitely not among its strengths. This had a few noticeable effects on our test results.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
Details here
The Competition
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | HP Omen 16-c0077ng R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M | 2.3 kg | 26 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 R7 5800H, Radeon RX 6600M | 2.4 kg | 23.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 29 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2.6 kg | 26.85 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 |
Case - Little shine on the HP Omen
Apart from the hinges, the notebook's exterior is made of plastic. The stability of the construction suffers as a result. While the slightly yielding keyboard frame is hardly noticeable, the large display seems a bit too bendy. In particular, opening it with one hand bends the screen unnecessarily. An aluminum cover like in many business notebooks could have helped here.
Overall, the build leaves a high-quality impression. All parts fit together nicely and have even gaps. The possibilities for torsion are limited. But HP could have made the display frame a little more rigid. The hinges also seem a little too weak so that the screen wobbles, but it can still be opened with one hand at the same time.
The large format is due to the 16-inch display. Even the slim display edges can only compensate for this to a limited extent, so that standard laptop bags or notebook backpacks may be too tight. In terms of case thickness, the HP Omen 16 is 3 mm (~0.12 in) thicker than its predecessor. It also outperforms other gaming laptops with similar performance values due to the particularly large cooling system, which protrudes from the case in the rear area of the base.
The advantage of all the plastic is a relatively low weight of 2.25 kg (~5.0 lb). However, the 230 W power supply increases the total weight to 3 kg (~6.6 lb).
Hardware - Suitable for a gaming notebook
The choice between three different monitor outputs is commendable. With USB-C, miniDP and HDMI, there is something for almost every external display. Thanks to DP 1.4 and HDMI 2.1, monitors with more than 4K resolution can also be connected.
USB ports on both the left and right of the case allow almost everything on the desk to be connected without any problems. However, the distance between the individual connections is sometimes very tight. The two USB ports on the right are only separated by a width of 4 mm (~0.16 in).
While the number of ports seems very practical, the speed of USB-A in particular is a downside. All three ports only reach 5 Gbit/s and thus only the USB 3.0 standard. At least the USB-C connection manages 10 Gbit/s, but compared to Thunderbolt 4 in particular, which is not supported here, this is only a fraction of what is currently technically possible.
SD Card Reader
The card reader's speed, tested with our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference memory card, could be significantly higher. However, those who are not exactly ambitious hobby photographers will hardly notice this shortcoming.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9510 i5 11400H FHD (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Dell Inspiron 16 Plus 7610-MHJ8F (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Communication
In addition to the LAN port, Wi-Fi 6 is also available. Like in the HP Victus 16, a Realtek WLAN card is used here, which, in our tests, was roughly average for this kind of hardware. But since the HP Omen 16 is in the entry-level segment of gaming notebooks, this should suffice. However, a look at the average of all the gaming laptops in our review shows that the throughput rates are usually much higher.
Webcam
The resolution and color accuracy of the HP Omen 16 webcam meet the minimum requirements at best, though this is common practice in this segment.
Maintenance
No hidden screws, no firmly anchored plastic clips: After loosening the eight screws, a little finesse is required to remove the base plate. But a flat pry tool never hurts.
Afterwards, all crucial spots are easily accessible for cleaning the ventilation or changing the battery, which is screwed at six points. Two RAM slots are available for upgrading possibilities. Another NVMe SSD can be inserted into the unequipped M.2 slot. The WLAN module, which is installed a little too close to the heat pipe for our taste, can also be replaced.
Input devices - Gaming keyboard glows colorfully
Keyboard
The keyboard appears to be completely geared towards gaming. Even if the downstroke of only 1 mm seems shallow for demanding users, the non-slip surface and the appropriate distance between the keys ensure fast and accurate input. Instead of the number field on the right side, there are arrow keys that have been given a lot of space. Unfortunately, the arrangement directly above it looks a little chaotic, which is initially particularly irritating. The "Delete" and "Power" keys aren't exactly where we'd expect them to be. The quick access to the Omen Gaming Hub with power control, color control and other practical extras for games is conspicuously placed.
The keyboard lighting is very nice to look at. Here, however, some things have been cut back. There are only four zones available, which can shine in 18 different colors. Only after installing Omen Light Studio are a few additional motion profiles added, which are generally oriented towards sound playback or the contents of the display. Due to the limited color selection and the fact that only four colors are shown at a time, the effects appear rudimentary. The static display with the separate "WASD" keys, on the other hand, looks good.
One workmanship flaw in our test device should not go unmentioned. The "Caps Lock" key sits crookedly. This is especially noticeable when the backlight is on, even though the button's function does not seem to be affected.
Touchpad
In all likelihood, one is likely to use the HP Omen 16 with a separate mouse. But the touchpad is quite convincing. It responds promptly and the matte yet smooth surface allows for precise control, even with multiple fingers. Of course, a few buttons below would have been even better, but uninteresting for full-blooded gamers with oscillating gaming mice anyway.
Display - HP also keeping demanding gamers in mind
In addition to the QHD display with 2,560 by 1,440 pixels used here, HP also offers a Full HD panel with a diagonal screen measurement of 16.1 inches for the Omen 16. Due to its size, the choice of a higher resolution seems reasonable since the screen looks like a 27-inch desktop monitor that also stands 27 inches away. Furthermore, the Full HD version only offers 144 hertz, whereas the larger variant offers 165 hertz. Whether this difference is actually perceptible is another question altogether.
Compared to the predecessor or competitor models Omen 16-b085ng or Victus 16, HP has lowered the peak brightness from 400 to 300 cd/m². When used on a desk and away from brightly lit workstations, the difference should hardly be noticeable. On the other hand, the even illumination is a positive note, and screen bleeding is also less noticeable due to the lowered brightness. In our test model, there was only a minimal abnormality in the bottom right corner.
As in the other HP models, we could not determine PWM flickering. There was also nothing to fault in terms of response times. Many other gaming notebooks are also around 10 ms.
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 295 cd/m²
Contrast: 1350:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.25 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.11
ΔE Greyscale 6.97 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
71.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
HP Omen 16-c0077ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AU Optronics B156HAN08.0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS LG Philips LGD0625 (LP156WFG-SPB3), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 Panda LM156LF-2F03, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | HP Omen 16-b0085ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) CSOT T3 MNG007DA1-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -5% | -41% | 4% | 4% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.8 | 65.9 -4% | 64.5 -6% | 39.7 -42% | 72.6 6% | 72.3 5% | |
sRGB Coverage | 96.9 | 91.6 -5% | 95.9 -1% | 59.7 -38% | 100 3% | 99.5 3% | 99 2% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 71.1 | 67 -6% | 65.8 -7% | 41.1 -42% | 73.5 3% | 73.8 4% | 73 3% |
Response Times | 44% | -16% | -208% | -9% | 7% | 41% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 13 ? | 5.06 ? 61% | 15 -15% | 40.4 ? -211% | 9.6 ? 26% | 8 ? 38% | 9.2 ? 29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 10 ? | 7.44 ? 26% | 11.6 -16% | 30.4 ? -204% | 14.4 ? -44% | 12.4 ? -24% | 4.8 52% |
PWM Frequency | |||||||
Screen | -20% | -2% | -49% | 4% | -26% | 14% | |
Brightness middle | 297 | 311 5% | 393 32% | 283 -5% | 361 22% | 405 36% | 551 86% |
Brightness | 283 | 325 15% | 353 25% | 266 -6% | 341 20% | 378 34% | 523 85% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 84 -8% | 83 -9% | 85 -7% | 88 -3% | 87 -4% | 88 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.22 -0% | 0.47 -114% | 0.2 9% | 0.3 -36% | 0.34 -55% | 0.54 -145% |
Contrast | 1350 | 1414 5% | 836 -38% | 1415 5% | 1203 -11% | 1191 -12% | 1020 -24% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.25 | 5.06 -56% | 2.84 13% | 5.32 -64% | 2.44 25% | 3.7 -14% | 1.8 45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.33 | 8.37 -32% | 7.15 -13% | 17.68 -179% | 6.37 -1% | 7.77 -23% | 2.53 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.11 | 2.62 -136% | 0.67 40% | 3.94 -255% | 1.26 -14% | 3.49 -214% | 1.66 -50% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.97 | 4.8 31% | 3.73 46% | 2.9 58% | 4.6 34% | 5.88 16% | 1.85 73% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.12 104% | 2.53 87% | 2.062 107% | 2.268 97% | 2.57 86% | 2.3 96% |
CCT | 6050 107% | 8002 81% | 7312 89% | 7167 91% | 6609 98% | 6342 102% | 6338 103% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 73.76 | 72.81 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.47 | 99.41 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
-7% | -8% /
-5% | -99% /
-70% | -0% /
2% | -5% /
-15% | 19% /
16% |
* ... smaller is better
The display delivers good pictures with a good contrast and a very low black value. Unfortunately, the factory settings are not quite optimal so that a slight yellowish tint can be observed. After calibration (the corresponding profile is available for download above the table), color deviations should no longer be visible to the naked eye.
Since the display is not intended for professional users, it offers adequate color reproduction with almost 100 percent coverage of the sRGB color space.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6 ms rise | |
↘ 7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
With 300 cd/m², the Omen 16 should only be used outdoors in an emergency. Gaming in particular is not very appealing because colors are much less visible. But texts and simple graphics remain legible even in direct sunlight. The matte display surface makes its contribution here. In contrast, the brightness is more than sufficient indoors, especially since the very low black value of 0.22 cd/m² ensures a high contrast.
The IPS panel is stable at the usual viewing angles. Color changes cannot be detected even at acute angles. However, the brightness decreases noticeably from about 70 to 80°, although this is hardly a practical viewing angle.
Performance - HP focuses on power
With the AMD Ryzen 7 5800H and the AMD Radeon RX 6600M in our HP Omen 16, there is sufficient power for current games. 16 GB of RAM should almost always suffice and can be easily expanded later. However, the limits of the notebook are tested when the system is made to run at 165 fps on the QHD display. 60 fps on the other hand seems to be almost effortlessly achievable in many games.
To stretch these limits as far as possible, we selected the "Performance" option in the Omen Gaming Hub, which increases the power supply to the processor by almost 20%.
Processor
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800H has almost unlimited power consumption. For fractions of a second, it can consume 160 W. For longer periods of time, 134 W is the standard. Both values are, for example, significantly higher than the settings found in the MSI Alpha 15 with an identical CPU.
However, a larger performance leap could not be determined. At least the normally inexpensive CPU can compete with an Intel Core i7-11800 or i7-12800H, albeit at the expense of efficiency. The effects of the increased power consumption are not really visible in our benchmarks. The Omen 16 is mostly in the midfield in the various ratings, closely surrounded by the competition. All that can be said is that the processor gives everything that it is capable of.
What is really striking is the lack of a drop in the values in the Cinebench loop, which usually prevents the system from overheating. The HP Omen 16 simply ramps up its ventilation to maximum, which then counteracts any drops in performance.
Cinebench R15 multi sustained load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng -1! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=29) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=29) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=188, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=31) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=188, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=30) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=195, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=28) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=192, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=29) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=29) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=183, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=187, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=28) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=29) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=188, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=28) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=188, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=28) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=187, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=29) |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=29) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=28) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=188, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng -9! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (10349 - 15169, n=29) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (63663 - 95954, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=184, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (2096 - 3287, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (91846 - 99215, n=29) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (9962 - 11871, n=29) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (36083 - 52732, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (50226 - 127832, n=29) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (591 - 828, n=29) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5457 - 7884, n=29) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=185, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (14445 - 25421, n=29) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 |
System Performance
Similarly to its predecessor, system performance is convincing in view of the direct competition. Taking into account possible fluctuations in the measurements, the Omen 16 is roughly on par with its competitors and is always near the top. The creation and editing of images and videos even scores above average. Models with the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 cannot quite keep up here.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=166, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (6875 - 7150, n=2) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=165, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (9907 - 10479, n=2) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=165, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (8922 - 9231, n=2) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=165, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (9977 - 10257, n=2) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=147, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1302 - 1309, n=3) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=147, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1284 - 1285, n=3) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=147, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1384 - 1401, n=3) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=147, last 2 years) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, AMD Radeon RX 6600M (1116 - 1136, n=3) |
PCMark 10 Score | 7150 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (34964 - 44180, n=29) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (39548 - 47260, n=29) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (28456 - 47022, n=29) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=184, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (76.3 - 105.1, n=29) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
Only three skipped frames when playing video in 4K is a decent result. The measured latencies, on the other hand, show that the tuning of the drivers does not seem to be optimal. With just under 2 ms, the HP Omen 16 takes the lead in the ranking, which is unfortunately the worst result. But it should be kept in mind that other comparable gaming notebooks are also unconvincing in this category.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The installed NVMe SSD Samsung PM981a, like in many other notebooks, was able to fully demonstrate its capacities. Almost all recorded values are above average, which also explains why, in our table of hard drives and SSDs, this SSD is found high at the top of our table.
The SSD would be even faster via PCIe 4.0, but this is not supported by the AMD processor. The connection on the motherboard itself would even be capable of this. But this feature does not play a significant role in the performance of this system.
HP Omen 16-c0077ng Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 Micron 2210 MTFDHBA1T0QFD | SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS Samsung SSD 980 500GB (MZ-V8V500BW) | Medion Erazer Deputy P25 Phison E12S-512GB-Phison-SSD-BICS4 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | HP Omen 16-b0085ng Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 512GB HBRPEKNX0202A(L/H) | Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Average Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Drive Performance Rating | |||||||||
Percent | 79.6 | 57.1 -28% | 59.6 -25% | 56.1 -30% | 74.5 -6% | 15.2 -81% | 44.8 -44% | 70.6 -11% | 96 21% |
AS SSD | -31% | -24% | -36% | -6% | -163% | -151% | -14% | 18% | |
Score Total | 5866 | 3300 -44% | 3394 -42% | 3329 -43% | 5503 -6% | 910 -84% | 3636 -38% | 4826 ? -18% | 6736 ? 15% |
Score Read | 2363 | 1157 -51% | 1612 -32% | 1574 -33% | 2017 -15% | 389 -84% | 1493 -37% | 1786 ? -24% | 2442 ? 3% |
Score Write | 2325 | 1546 -34% | 1007 -57% | 1000 -57% | 2452 5% | 338 -85% | 1397 -40% | 2144 ? -8% | 3109 ? 34% |
Seq Read | 3148 | 2016 -36% | 2589 -18% | 2844 -10% | 2383 -24% | 925 -71% | 2695 -14% | 2553 ? -19% | 4933 ? 57% |
Seq Write | 2565 | 1830 -29% | 1435 -44% | 1779 -31% | 2466 -4% | 496 -81% | 2384 -7% | 2084 ? -19% | 3755 ? 46% |
4K Read | 52.1 | 55.2 6% | 53.6 3% | 42.9 -18% | 44.14 -15% | 19.99 -62% | 29.75 -43% | 53.1 ? 2% | 65.3 ? 25% |
4K Write | 136.8 | 127.7 -7% | 154.2 13% | 130.7 -4% | 117.5 -14% | 17.96 -87% | 52 -62% | 131.2 ? -4% | 212 ? 55% |
4K-64 Read | 1996 | 901 -55% | 1299 -35% | 1246 -38% | 1734 -13% | 276.2 -86% | 1193 -40% | 1477 ? -26% | 1877 ? -6% |
4K-64 Write | 1931 | 1235 -36% | 710 -63% | 692 -64% | 2088 8% | 270.2 -86% | 1107 -43% | 1805 ? -7% | 2524 ? 31% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.087 -32% | 0.056 15% | 0.089 -35% | 0.049 26% | 0.23 -248% | 0.136 -106% | 0.04983 ? 24% | 0.05556 ? 16% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.032 -19% | 0.027 -0% | 0.043 -59% | 0.032 -19% | 0.249 -822% | 0.36 -1233% | 0.04222 ? -56% | 0.04807 ? -78% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -30% /
-30% | -25% /
-24% | -33% /
-35% | -6% /
-6% | -122% /
-156% | -98% /
-142% | -13% /
-14% | 20% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The AMD Radeon RX 6600M is one of the entry-level cards and is roughly on par with a Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060. The AMD card offers larger video memory, so it should be able to handle more demanding titles somewhat better.
Unlike the processor, however, the Omen 16 does not supply the GPU with additional power, but only with a maximum of 115 W. In some gaming laptops such as the Schenker XMG Apex 15, the card is supplied with a maximum of 130 W by Nvidia.
In battery mode, HP has even limited power consumption to just 25 W. Without a permanent power supply, gaming is only possible to a limited extent.
3DMark 11 Performance | 25021 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 51430 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21360 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 8353 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
Regarding the choice of possible games, there are hardly any restrictions. Current titles achieve more than respectable frame rates even with QHD resolution. This is especially true of games that have been specially programmed for a wide audience and generally require less system performance. The graphics performance here should be sufficient for a while for triple-A games, ranging from sports simulation to battle royale games.
In Full HD, even if the highest level of detail is selected, a three-digit framerate is almost always achievable to supply the 165 hertz of the display with content.
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b0085ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 Pro 16ACH6H (82JQ001PGE) | |
SCHENKER XMG Apex 15 NH57E PS | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (75.4 - 88.2, n=6) | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Elex 2 | |
1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (30.1 - 118.5, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (59 - 66.1, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
2560x1440 Ultra / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (59.9 - 116.7, n=4, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M () |
GRID Legends | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (109.8 - 199, n=9, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (105 - 131.7, n=5) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
2560x1440 Ultra Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 190, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (87 - 102.8, n=4) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng |
Back 4 Blood | |
1920x1080 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (72.3 - 309, n=7, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M () | |
Medion Erazer Deputy P25 | |
2560x1440 Epic Preset (DX12) AA:T | |
Average of class Gaming (94.7 - 327, n=4, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-c0077ng | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M () |
GTA V | |
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Average of class Gaming (36.9 - 160.6, n=110, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 6600M (49.3 - 63.8, n=4) |