HP Victus 16 gaming laptop review: Powerful hardware in a stylish case

The brand new HP Victus 16 is available in various equipment configurations. Our test unit with the label e0179ng is available for almost 1400 Euros (~$1641) and contains a powerful GeForce RTX 3060 with 6 GB of GDDR6-VRAM and a very powerful Ryzen 7 5800H. They are accompanied by 16 GB of RAM in dual-channel mode (2x 8 GB DDR4-3.200) and a large, 1 TB NVMe SSD. The display is a matte 16.1-inch panel based on IPS with a 1920 x 1080 pixel resolution that supports FreeSync. Windows 10 Home 64 bit is preinstalled as the operating system.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
The competitors of the Victus 16-e0179ng include other gaming laptops with the GeForce RTX 3060 such as the Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH, the Alienware m15 R5, and the Asus TUF F15 FX506HM. These competitors are also listed as the comparison devices in our charts below.
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.3 % | 09/2021 | HP Victus 16-e0179ng R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
83.4 % | 09/2021 | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.7 % | 06/2021 | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
85.9 % | 06/2021 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Case
HP laptops are known for their unique designs. The Victus 16 is no exception here and distinguishes itself visually in many ways from the competitors. In addition to the V on the display lid (which is unfortunately very susceptible to fingerprints), the pretty design of the fan vents on the case bottom provides an individual look. Despite its numerous design elements, the case does not look overly playful but still rather subdued, which is mainly due to the dark colors.
In terms of the build quality, the Victus 16 leaves some mixed feelings. The plastic surfaces, which tend to produce clattering in some places (cover and touchpad area) could be more robust, for example. The hinges are also not perfect. First, when we open the display lid, the base unit also moves slightly with it, and second, vibrations of the surface will also lead to more than the usual wobbling of the display. On the other hand, the workmanship gives hardly any reason for complaint. Almost all the case elements of our test unit show clean transitions. However, due to the edgy design, some corners still feel quite sharp, so they can cause some discomfort while using the laptop.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
At 2.5 kg (~5.5 lb), the weight of the Victus 16 is similar to that of the competitors. Only the Asus TUF F15 is a tick lighter at 2.3 kg (~5 lb). In terms of the height, with its 2.35 cm (~0.93 in), the 16-inch laptop presents a slim impression, placing between the slimmer Alienware m15 R5 and the thicker Lenovo Legion 5.
Equipment
Connections
The connection equipment is not quite up-to-date anymore. Because of AMD, the laptop has to make do without Thunderbolt. However, the fact that the four available USB ports (3x Type-A, 1x Type-C) only support 3.2 Gen1, which corresponds to the old 3.0 standard, is an unnecessary limitation. At least the Type-C port is capable of DisplayPort output, so that together with the HDMI 2.1 port and the built-in display, you can run up to three displays. The connections are completed by an RJ45 port, an audio port (combined headset/microphone port), and a card reader.
Since most of the connections are placed in the back half of both sides, it is easy to use an external mouse, particularly for right-handed users.
SD Card Reader
The card reader (SD/SDHC/SDXC) delivers a mediocre performance. Barely 80 MB/s during sequential reading and transferring photos are less than the average for gaming laptops. But at least the Victus 16 has a card reader, while all of the competitors fail in this regard.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=92, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=83, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Communication
A communication module from Realtek handles the wireless communication. While the RTL8852AE is at a fairly current level in terms of the technology (Wi-Fi 6), in our range test using the Netgear Nighthawk AX12 router (1 m distance), the measured results weren't really convincing. For receiving data, the Victus 16 finished in the last place, for example.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=70, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (424 - 928, n=20) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average RealTek Semiconductor RTL8852AE (621 - 877, n=20) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Webcam
As we are used to from most laptops, the webcam quality is limited. In addition to the color accuracy, the image sharpness also turns out disappointing.

Accessories
All that is included in the box is a quick start guide and a nicely rounded 200-Watt power supply.
Maintenance
Not only will you need a small screw driver for tiny Philips screws to get at the insides, but you also need a good combination of delicate touch and force. The bottom of the case is tightly fastened, especially in the back. After you finally succeeded in opening the case, you are greeted by a clean presentation. The space below the palm rest is completely taken up by the battery. Behind that are two RAM slots and two M.2 slots (each of them with a cooling element). The cooling system consists of two fans, several heat pipes, and relatively large-size metal surfaces.
Input Devices
Keyboard
The Victus 16 uses a slightly unconventional keyboard layout. The position of the power button is just as unusual as the placement of the Insert and Delete keys, as well as the ><| key (see picture). German users will also have to get used to the single-row Enter key. There are more negative points for the measly arrow keys that are hardly suitable for gaming. On the other hand, the 16-inch laptop offers a full number block. We would evaluate the typing experience as "good" (pressure point, stroke, etc.), although the shape of the keys has a real edge to it.
Touchpad
Aside from the stability, which is less than optimal, the touchpad delivers a good performance. With a width of 12.5 cm (~4.9 in) and depth of 8 cm (~3.1 in), it is pleasantly large. Even though the surface feels slightly less smooth than in many competitors, all the mouse movements succeed easily. Gesture support such as zooming and scrolling with two fingers also works reliably. A small issue: left and right clicks at the bottom edge produce slight clattering sounds, which takes away some of the quality impression of the laptop.
Display
While some of the competitors offer mediocre displays (the first of those being the Asus TUF F15), the 144-Hz panel of the Victus 16-e0179ng scores in almost every regard.
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 361 cd/m²
Contrast: 1203:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.44 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.1, calibrated: 1.26
ΔE Greyscale 4.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
73.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
72.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.268
HP Victus 16-e0179ng BOE09BE, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.10 | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL B156HAN12.H, , 1920x1080, 15.60 | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition B156HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -40% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 72.6 | 65.4 -10% | 41.9 -42% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 96.3 -4% | 62.9 -37% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.5 | 67.5 -8% | 43.3 -41% | |
Response Times | -3% | 50% | -123% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 9.6 ? | 13.6 ? -42% | 4 ? 58% | 28.4 ? -196% |
Response Time Black / White * | 14.4 ? | 9.2 ? 36% | 8.4 ? 42% | 21.6 ? -50% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | -14% | 3% | -59% | |
Brightness middle | 361 | 350 -3% | 329 -9% | 268.3 -26% |
Brightness | 341 | 350 3% | 321 -6% | 257 -25% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 96 9% | 92 5% | 84 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.3 -0% | 0.27 10% | 0.34 -13% |
Contrast | 1203 | 1167 -3% | 1219 1% | 789 -34% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.44 | 3.9 -60% | 2.78 -14% | 5.05 -107% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.37 | 8.2 -29% | 4.88 23% | 15.43 -142% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.26 | 1.6 -27% | 1.63 -29% | 3.21 -155% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 5.5 -20% | 2.5 46% | 5.5 -20% |
Gamma | 2.268 97% | 2.15 102% | 2.106 104% | 2.35 94% |
CCT | 6609 98% | 7414 88% | 6201 105% | 7392 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 76 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -8% /
-11% | 27% /
12% | -74% /
-64% |
* ... smaller is better
This begins with the color space coverage, which measures 100% sRGB and almost 74% AdobeRGB. This is quite a lot for a gaming laptop. At about 10 ms, the response time is also not bad.
The 16-inch screen also leaves a convincing impression in the rest of the measurements. The relatively low black value (0.3 cd/m²) and the acceptable brightness (341 cd/m² on average) result in a contrast of about 1200:1. Together with the relatively good color reproduction in the state of delivery, this ensures a vibrant and differentiated display image.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 27 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19035 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Test Conditions
Those who like to finetune the performance should be pleased about the Omen Gaming Hub. The "Victus Laptop" menu offers tabs for system monitoring (temperature, load, …), a network booster, and performance control. In the latter, we selected the "Performance" mode with the automatic fan speed for our measurements.
Performance
Considering the GeForce RTX 3060, the Victus 16-e0179ng should be settled in the lower high-end range, even though 6 GB of VRAM are not state-of-the-art at this point anymore. 16 GB of RAM and a 1-TB SSD should satisfy most buyers and be sufficient for the next few years. The same goes for the octa-core processor from AMD.
Processor
The Ryzen 7 5800H is considered the absolute top in the laptop segment. The octa-core model on 7-nm basis that contains 16 MB L3 cache and is able to work on 16 threads in parallel via SMT does not have to hide behind the Intel competitors. The opposite is the case, in fact.
As our Cinebench R15 loop shows, the 5800H performs at the level of the Core i7-11800H, which is also specified at 45 watts TDP. However, newer benchmarks such as Cinebench R23 reveal that the processor in the Victus 16 is unable to develop its full potential. In other devices, the AMD CPU achieves a performance that is various percentage points higher. The basic clock speed of the 5800H is also 3.2 GHz. Under load, up to 4.4 GHz are possible due to the automatic Turbo.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (209 - 234, n=28) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1487 - 2119, n=27) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (3430 - 5020, n=30) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (502 - 560, n=29) |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (8812 - 13214, n=28) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1294 - 1441, n=28) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (237 - 340, n=28) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=238, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=234, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (45773 - 59986, n=27) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (5038 - 5632, n=28) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=233, last 2 years) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (6551 - 9062, n=27) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (1336 - 1505, n=27) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (11.6 - 16.1, n=28) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (47.4 - 113, n=28) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H (0.511 - 0.559, n=27) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=234, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
System Performance
In the PCMark 10 system test, the Victus ends up next to last. However, the differences turn out relatively small and should be hardly noticeable in practical operation. Subjectively, the operating system responds as quickly as we expect from a current gaming laptop.
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6465 - 6855, n=6) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (9589 - 10414, n=6) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (8798 - 9728, n=6) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=193, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (7884 - 9497, n=6) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL |
PCMark 10 Score | 6567 points | |
Help |
DPC Latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Solution
As the storage solution, HP uses an NVMe drive from Western Digital in our test unit. The 1-TB version of the WDC PC SN730 races past most of the SSDs of the competitors that use Micron, Toshiba, or SK Hynix SSDs, particularly in the AS SSD benchmark. It is also very useful that those who want to expand the storage will find an empty M.2 slot under the hood.
HP Victus 16-e0179ng WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL Micron 2300 512GB MTFDHBA512TDV | Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 4% | -22% | 3% | |
Write 4K | 157.3 | 124.6 -21% | 116.9 -26% | 168.1 7% |
Read 4K | 49 | 54.2 11% | 44.56 -9% | 65.1 33% |
Write Seq | 2983 | 2706 -9% | 1552 -48% | 2124 -29% |
Read Seq | 2247 | 2298 2% | 1682 -25% | 2204 -2% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 395 | 499.7 27% | 497.8 26% | 455.3 15% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 557 | 570 2% | 436.8 -22% | 465.6 -16% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3094 | 2999 -3% | 1461 -53% | 2911 -6% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2871 | 3461 21% | 2364 -18% | 3519 23% |
AS SSD | -27% | -80% | -13% | |
Seq Read | 2383 | 2960 24% | 2082 -13% | 2873 21% |
Seq Write | 2466 | 2586 5% | 825 -67% | 1619 -34% |
4K Read | 44.14 | 46.84 6% | 42.41 -4% | 57.5 30% |
4K Write | 117.5 | 96.1 -18% | 98.3 -16% | 149.6 27% |
4K-64 Read | 1734 | 854 -51% | 1255 -28% | 1252 -28% |
4K-64 Write | 2088 | 2015 -3% | 738 -65% | 2196 5% |
Access Time Read * | 0.049 | 0.048 2% | 0.109 -122% | 0.04 18% |
Access Time Write * | 0.032 | 0.094 -194% | 0.17 -431% | 0.082 -156% |
Score Read | 2017 | 1197 -41% | 1506 -25% | 1597 -21% |
Score Write | 2452 | 2370 -3% | 918 -63% | 2508 2% |
Score Total | 5503 | 4170 -24% | 3136 -43% | 4869 -12% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-14% | -51% /
-55% | -5% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics Card
In contrast to the GeForce RTX 3050 (Ti), which due to its meager video storage of only 4 GB does not offer any particular assurance and sense of being future proof, the GeForce RTX 3060 is a good choice for price conscious gamers. The DirectX 12 model from Nvidia's Ampere generation at least has 6 GB of GDDR6 VRAM, which is currently still sufficient.
However, analogous to the CPU performance, the GPU performance of the Victus 16 is also mostly below average compared to the competitors. This is not surprising, since the HP only configured the RTX 3060 with a TGP of 95 watts (including Dynamic Boost). Theoretically, up to 130 watts are possible, as for example Lenovo shows with the Legion 5. That laptop is often more than 10% ahead of the HP device in the synthetic graphics benchmarks and also in the gaming runs.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (13799 - 30772, n=43) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (16354 - 23109, n=49) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 5 15ACH-82JU00C6GE-FL | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (6285 - 9235, n=49) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics | |
Average of class Gaming (280 - 14457, n=152, last 2 years) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (3724 - 5399, n=25) | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
3DMark 11 Performance | 22166 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45994 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 17711 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7680 points | |
Help |
Gaming Performance
Despite the relatively low TGP, the Victus holds its own with modern games. With the exception of "Crysis Remastered," which uses raytracing at higher levels, all the tested games were run at more than 60 fps even in maximum detail settings. This was the case even for extremely demanding and VRAM hungry games such as the recently introduced "Deathloop."
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (81 - 186.8, n=41) | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 217, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (58.2 - 91.5, n=48) | |
Alienware m15 R5 Ryzen Edition | |
Asus TUF Gaming F15 FX506HM | |
HP Victus 16-e0179ng |
Beyond some smaller FPS fluctuations, the constant load test with "The Witcher 3" shows nothing unusual.