Medion Erazer Beast X20 (Tongfang GM7MG7P) in review: Thin gaming notebook with good battery runtimes

A round thing. The compact Erazer Beast X20 scores with a Core-i7-10870H processor, GeForce-RTX-3070 laptop GPU, 32 GB of RAM (dual-channel mode), space for two NVMe SSDs, and a responsive WQHD display (IPS, 165 Hz). The metal chassis used has proven to be very stable.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, ✓ Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 07/10/2021 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The Medion Erazer Beast X20 belongs to the class of 17.3-inch gaming notebooks. Like the almost identical predecessor, the current model is also based on a barebone from the company Tongfang (GM7MG7P). The competitors include devices like the Schenker XMG Neo 17 the Aorus 17G YD and the MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG.

Test device courtesy of Medion DE

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating	Rating Version	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size
85.5 %	07/2021	Medion Erazer Beast X20 i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.2 kg	23 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
85.1 %	01/2021	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
85.1 %	03/2021	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86 %	06/2021	Aorus 17G YD i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	26 mm	17.30"	1920x1080

Case - The X20 comes with a metal chassis

Medion relies on the chic, matte-black metal case for the X20, which we already know from the X10. There is only a small difference between the chassis: The webcam is located below the display in the X10, and above the display in the X20. Both chassis have a slim display bezel. The innards can be accessed after removing the bottom shell. The battery is permanently installed.

The notebook is well manufactured. The gaps are correct and there are no material protrusions. Stability and rigidity are pleasing: The base unit cannot be twisted, the lid to a small extent. However, the latter is completely within limits. Pressure on the lid's back doesn't lead to image changes. The hinges keep the lid firmly in position. The maximum opening angle is around 130 degrees. Opening the lid with one hand is possible.

Within our comparison field, the Erazer represents the most compact and lightest device.

Size comparison

Aorus 17G YD MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Medion Erazer Beast X20 ❌

Features - The Erazer Beast does not have Thunderbolt

While the USB-C slot of the Erazer Beast X10 supports Thunderbolt 3, the corresponding slot of the X20 "only" works with the USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard. The latter offers DisplayPort via USB-C. Thus, the laptop has two video outputs together with the HDMI 2.1 slot, three USB-A ports (2x USB 3.1 Gen 1, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2), two audio jacks (headphone output, microphone input), a Gigabit Ethernet slot, and an opening for a cable lock.

SDCardreader

The microSD memory card reader (reference card: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) belongs to the medium-fast models with maximum transfer rates of 64 MB/s (transfer of 250 jpg image files with around 5 MB each) and 77 MB/s (copying large data blocks).

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	192 MB/s ∼100% +200%
Average of class Gaming (18 - 222, n=94, last 2 years)	116.9 MB/s ∼61% +83%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	83 MB/s ∼43% +30%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	64 MB/s ∼33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	197 MB/s ∼100% +156%
Average of class Gaming (20.5 - 263, n=88, last 2 years)	136.2 MB/s ∼69% +77%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	90 MB/s ∼46% +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	77 MB/s ∼39%

Communication

The WLAN chip (Intel AX201) supports the 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax standards and offers Bluetooth 5 functionality. The data rates determined under optimal conditions (no other WLAN devices in the near vicinity, short distance between notebook and server PC) turn out good to very good. Wired network connections are handled by a Gigabit Ethernet chip (RTL8125) from Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1369 (693^min - 1436^max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1351 (1239^min - 1420^max) MBit/s ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1350 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1310 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1180 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=322)	1162 MBit/s ∼85% -14%
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1603, n=165, last 2 years)	1156 MBit/s ∼84% -14%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1480 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1370 MBit/s ∼93% +34%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1270 MBit/s ∼86% +24%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=322)	1261 MBit/s ∼85% +24%
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=165, last 2 years)	1230 MBit/s ∼83% +20%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1169 (619^min - 1217^max) MBit/s ∼79% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1021 (947^min - 1109^max) MBit/s ∼69%

Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1021 (947-1109)

Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1148 (619-1217)

Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1351 (1239-1420)

Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (693-1436)

Webcam

The webcam (0.9 MP) produces pictures in a maximum resolution of 1,280 x 720 pixels. The color accuracy is a problem. With a color deviation of almost 16, the target (DeltaE less than 3) is missed very clearly.

ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804: 19.69 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.41 ∆E

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)

Accessories

The notebook comes with the usual documents: a quick start guide and warranty information.

Maintenance

After removing all screws on the bottom of the device, the bottom tray of our test device can be removed quite easily. You might need a joint smoother or a thin spatula to remove the bottom shell in other models. After that, there is access to the working memory banks (both occupied), the two M.2-2280 slots (one occupied), the WLAN module, the fans, the BIOS battery and the battery.

Warranty

Medion grants the Erazer a two-year warranty. Warranty extensions are not available.

Input devices - Keyboard with RGB lighting

Keyboard

The concave keys of the illuminated chiclet keyboard offer a short stroke and a clear pressure point. The resistance could be a bit crisper for our taste. Good: The keyboard does not bounce during typing. The four-level key illumination (RGB) is controlled via two function keys. All in all, Medion delivers a keyboard that is suitable for everyday use.

Touchpad

A multitouch-capable ClickPad (approx. 13.2 x 7.5 cm/~5.2 x 3.0 in) serves as a mouse replacement. Its smooth surface makes it easy for the fingers to glide. The pad also responds to inputs in the corners. It offers a short stroke and a clear pressure point.

Display - 165 Hz IPS

While the average brightness (340.7 cd/m²) of the matte 17.3-inch screen (1,920 x 1,080 pixels) meets the target (> 300 cd/m²), the contrast (881:1) is a bit too low. We consider values beyond 1000:1 to be good. The 165 Hz panel has short response times and does not exhibit PWM flickering.


368 cd/m²	356 cd/m²	330 cd/m²
336 cd/m²	370 cd/m²	347 cd/m²
304 cd/m²	328 cd/m²	327 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2

X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 370 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 340.7 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: 881:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
71.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.176

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Medion Erazer Beast X20 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Aorus 17G YD Sharp LQ173M1JW04, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display		1%	-6%	2%	-6%
Display P3 Coverage	70.1	70.5 1%	64.7 -8%	72.3 3%	64.5 -8%
sRGB Coverage	99	99.5 1%	96.4 -3%	100 1%	95.6 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	71.3	71.8 1%	66.9 -6%	73.7 3%	65.6 -8%
Response Times		-5%	21%	10%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	16 ?(8.4, 7.6)	16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4) -5%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 54%	13.6 ?(6.8, 6.8) 15%	14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8) 10%
Response Time Black / White *	9.6 ?(4.4, 5.2)	10 ?(4, 6) -4%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) -13%	9.2 ?(5.2, 4) 4%	10 ?(5.2, 4.8) -4%
PWM Frequency			24510 ?(39)
Screen		-13%	-5%	-23%	-46%
Brightness middle	370	410 11%	328 -11%	286 -23%	313 -15%
Brightness	341	381 12%	314 -8%	282 -17%	297 -13%
Brightness Distribution	82	88 7%	87 6%	73 -11%	88 7%
Black Level *	0.42	0.37 12%	0.29 31%	0.24 43%	0.27 36%
Contrast	881	1108 26%	1131 28%	1192 35%	1159 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.76	2.55 -45%	1.93 -10%	2.79 -59%	2.96 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.88	4.33 -50%	4.94 -72%	6.23 -116%	9.83 -241%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.3	1.28 2%	0.68 48%	0.82 37%	1.03 21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.8	3.4 -89%	2.8 -56%	3.5 -94%	4.9 -172%
Gamma	2.176 ^101%	2.275 ^97%	2.18 ^101%	2.358 ^93%	2.187 ^101%
CCT	6543 ^99%	6637 ^98%	7023 ^93%	6147 ^106%	7559 ^86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		72	67	74	66
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		95	89	96	89
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-6% / -9%	3% / -1%	-4% / -13%	-16% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

The screen shows a good color reproduction in its state of delivery and meets the target with a color deviation of just under 1.8 (Delta E less than 3). It does not suffer from a blue cast. Slight improvements can be achieved with a calibration. The deviation drops to 1.3 and the grayscale levels are displayed more balanced. The sRGB color space is reproduced to 99%, the AdobeRGB color space to 71%.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.4 ms rise
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8.4 ms rise
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21941 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Outdoor reading of the display is possible when the sun does not shine too brightly.

Performance - Eight-core power

Medion's Erazer Beast X20 is a 17.3-inch gaming notebook that brings every current game smoothly to the screen.

Test conditions

The pre-installed Control Center allows choosing a performance profile ("Balanced", "Enthusiast", "Overboost"), among other things. We used the "Enthusiast" profile and the automatic fan control. The battery tests were performed with the "Balanced" profile active. A button next to the power button allows quick switching between the performance profiles.

	Balanced	Enthusiast	Overboost
Power Limit 1	35 Watt	60 Watt	75 Watt
Power Limit 2	35 Watt	60 Watt	75 Watt

Five subprofiles can - but do not have to - be defined for each of the three performance profiles. For example, the CPU's power limits, the GPU's TGP and/or the temperature upper limits could be adjusted to individual usage scenarios.

Processor

The Core i7-10870H eight-core processor (Comet Lake) works with a base clock of 2.2 GHz. An increase to 4.2 GHz (eight cores) to 5 GHz (one core) is possible via Turbo. Hyperthreading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor runs the CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark with 2.2 to 3.8 GHz (multi-thread) and 4 to 4.7 GHz (single-thread). In battery mode, the CPU runs at 2.3 to 2.5 GHz (multi-thread) and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz (single-thread).

Despite two additional CPU cores, the Core i7 achieves roughly the same test results as the one in the Erazer Beast X10, a Core i7-10750H six-core processor (Comet Lake). The relatively low power limits are responsible for this. The power limits would have to be increased via the Control Center for more multi-thread performance. This has hardly any impact on the single-thread performance.

The CPU remains stable at maximum power limits (PL1/PL2: 120 watts). We additionally ran some benchmarks under these conditions. The results can be found in the comparison tables.

We check whether the CPU Turbo is used permanently in mains operation by running the multi-thread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark in a loop for at least 30 minutes. The Turbo is used on medium level. Increasing the power limits to 120 watts causes the Turbo clock to increase.

Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1321 (1310.36-1336.01)

Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H; PL1/2 120W: Ø1625 (1613.94-1681.87)

Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)

MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)

Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1943 (1915.62-2089.21)

Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

201 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1336 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

147.1 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	81.1 pt ∼81%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	78.6 pt ∼79%
Average of class Gaming	73.8 pt ∼74%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	67.9 pt ∼68%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H	64.9 pt ∼65%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	59.4 pt ∼59%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 ^-2! Intel Core i7-10750H	57.9 pt ∼58%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG ^-2! Intel Core i7-10750H	56 pt ∼56%

Cinebench R23
CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	1497 Points ∼100% +22%
Average of class Gaming (778 - 1920, n=155, last 2 years)	1475 Points ∼99% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1403 Points ∼94% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1227 Points ∼82%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	1227 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1177 - 1253, n=12)	1223 Points ∼82% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1136 Points ∼76% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	12862 Points ∼100% +56%
Average of class Gaming (4032 - 19282, n=156, last 2 years)	12097 Points ∼94% +47%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11739 Points ∼91% +42%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	10215 Points ∼79% +24%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (8250 - 10450, n=12)	9594 Points ∼75% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	8250 Points ∼64%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	7965 Points ∼62% -3%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming (300 - 740, n=227, last 2 years)	544 Points ∼100% +16%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	541 Points ∼99% +15%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	540 Points ∼99% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	476 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (460 - 484, n=12)	474 Points ∼87% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	470 Points ∼86%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	460 Points ∼85% -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	4818 Points ∼100% +59%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4510 Points ∼94% +49%
Average of class Gaming (1397 - 7382, n=227, last 2 years)	4291 Points ∼89% +42%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	3910 Points ∼81% +29%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (3027 - 4020, n=12)	3588 Points ∼74% +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	3027 Points ∼63%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	2998 Points ∼62% -1%

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	232 Points ∼100% +15%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	227 Points ∼98% +13%
Average of class Gaming (108 - 277, n=229, last 2 years)	217 Points ∼94% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	201 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (196 - 204, n=11)	199.8 Points ∼86% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	199 Points ∼86% -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	198 Points ∼85% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	196 Points ∼84% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	2108 (2036.87^min - 2108.48^max) Points ∼100% +58%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	2089 Points ∼99% +56%
Average of class Gaming (536 - 3077, n=239, last 2 years)	1805 Points ∼86% +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	1682 Points ∼80% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1336 - 1740, n=14)	1614 Points ∼77% +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1364 Points ∼65% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1336 Points ∼63%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1258 (1113.24^min - 1257.82^max) Points ∼60% -6%

Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	358 Seconds * ∼100% -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	333 Seconds * ∼93%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	322 Seconds * ∼90% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (272 - 333, n=12)	298 Seconds * ∼83% +11%
Average of class Gaming (168 - 732, n=226, last 2 years)	294 Seconds * ∼82% +12%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	284.1 Seconds * ∼79% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	273 Seconds * ∼76% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	245 Seconds * ∼68% +26%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5590 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	5547 MIPS ∼99% +4%
Average of class Gaming (2743 - 6506, n=226, last 2 years)	5368 MIPS ∼96% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	5343 MIPS ∼96% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	5321 MIPS ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (5145 - 5429, n=12)	5293 MIPS ∼95% -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	5236 MIPS ∼94% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	5191 MIPS ∼93% -2%
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	57284 MIPS ∼100% +45%
Average of class Gaming (21148 - 76063, n=226, last 2 years)	48802 MIPS ∼85% +23%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	48261 MIPS ∼84% +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	46708 MIPS ∼82% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (39581 - 46708, n=12)	44452 MIPS ∼78% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	39581 MIPS ∼69%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	37082 MIPS ∼65% -6%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	36161 MIPS ∼63% -9%

Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	1583 Points ∼100% +33%
Average of class Gaming (703 - 1933, n=219, last 2 years)	1426 Points ∼90% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1354 Points ∼86% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	1331 Points ∼84% +12%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	1304 Points ∼82% +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	1287 Points ∼81% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (1191 - 1295, n=12)	1273 Points ∼80% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	1191 Points ∼75%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	9317 Points ∼100% +46%
Average of class Gaming (2783 - 14294, n=219, last 2 years)	8209 Points ∼88% +28%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	8035 Points ∼86% +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	7755 Points ∼83% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (6403 - 7882, n=12)	7482 Points ∼80% +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	6652 Points ∼71% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	6403 Points ∼69%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	6392 Points ∼69% 0%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	15.8 fps ∼100% +48%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	15.6 fps ∼99% +46%
Average of class Gaming (4.67 - 22.5, n=225, last 2 years)	13.5 fps ∼85% +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	13.2 fps ∼84% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (10.7 - 13.5, n=12)	12.2 fps ∼77% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	11.6 fps ∼73% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	10.7 fps ∼68%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	10.4 fps ∼66% -3%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (46 - 64.4, n=12)	53.7 s * ∼100% -3%
Average of class Gaming (23.9 - 113, n=224, last 2 years)	52.8 s * ∼98% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	52.2 s * ∼97%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	51.3 s * ∼96% +2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	50.9 s * ∼95% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	50.8 s * ∼95% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	48.36 s * ∼90% +7%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	39 s * ∼73% +25%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H	0.6 sec * ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	0.594 sec * ∼99% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H	0.593 sec * ∼99% +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H	0.592 sec * ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H (0.573 - 0.614, n=12)	0.591 sec * ∼99% +1%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H	0.558 sec * ∼93% +7%
Average of class Gaming (0.412 - 1.088, n=223, last 2 years)	0.555 sec * ∼93% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.512 sec * ∼85% +15%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The nimble and smoothly working system offers enough computing power for performance demanding applications like gaming for years. This is complemented by good PCMark results.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4011 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6129 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5405 points
PCMark 10 Score		5908 points
Help

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7073 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6983 Points ∼99% +18%
Average of class Gaming (4077 - 8186, n=193, last 2 years)	6429 Points ∼91% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (5660 - 6630, n=8)	6230 Points ∼88% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	6207 Points ∼88% +5%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	6017 Points ∼85% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	5908 Points ∼84%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5581 Points ∼79% -6%
Essentials
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10295 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10051 Points ∼98% +17%
Average of class Gaming (7148 - 11205, n=192, last 2 years)	9807 Points ∼95% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9209 Points ∼89% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (8609 - 9518, n=8)	9120 Points ∼89% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	8829 Points ∼86% +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8652 Points ∼84% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	8609 Points ∼84%
Productivity
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9259 Points ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8849 Points ∼96% +14%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	8657 Points ∼93% +11%
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 10638, n=192, last 2 years)	8634 Points ∼93% +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	8383 Points ∼91% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7012 - 8741, n=8)	8032 Points ∼87% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	7771 Points ∼84%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	7415 Points ∼80% -5%
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	10389 Points ∼100% +24%
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	10075 Points ∼97% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (7831 - 10130, n=8)	8816 Points ∼85% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)	8766 Points ∼84% +5%
Average of class Gaming (3670 - 13098, n=192, last 2 years)	8650 Points ∼83% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	8367 Points ∼81%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	7893 Points ∼76% -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6912 Points ∼67% -17%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5265 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Gaming (3181 - 6657, n=78, last 2 years)	4645 Points ∼88% +16%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (4011 - 4792, n=4)	4384 Points ∼83% +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4350 Points ∼83% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	4011 Points ∼76%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	7104 Points ∼100% +31%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5792 Points ∼82% +7%
Average of class Gaming (4265 - 7104, n=78, last 2 years)	5703 Points ∼80% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (4878 - 6300, n=4)	5638 Points ∼79% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	5405 Points ∼76%

DPC latencies

The standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, Prime95 high-load) revealed conspicuous DPC latencies. The system does not seem to be suitable for real-time video and audio editing.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	1821 μs * ∼100% -116%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	1082 μs * ∼59% -28%
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1064 μs * ∼58% -26%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	844 μs * ∼46%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	787 μs * ∼43% +7%

* ... smaller is better

The overclocking of the working memory would be possible

The BIOS of the computer offers the possibility of memory overclocking. The whole thing is done at your own risk. Possible damage would be the owner's responsibility. However, the corresponding overclocking option has to be enabled via the Control Center first.

Mass storage

An NVMe SSD (M.2-2280) from Phison serves as the system drive. It provides 2 TB of storage space and delivers very good transfer rates. The notebook still has room for a second NVMe-SSD.

The notebook offers space for two NVMe SSDs.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3440 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3017 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 627 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 532 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1371 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 1591 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.96 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.5 MB/s

	Medion Erazer Beast X20 Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4	Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB	Aorus 17G YD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		29%	-29%	62%	-8%
Write 4K	155.5	206.1 33%	143.7 -8%	227.4 46%	151 -3%
Read 4K	47.96	53 11%	45.1 -6%	91.3 90%	49.29 3%
Write Seq	1591	3018 90%	978 -39%	2241 41%	1109 -30%
Read Seq	1371	2575 88%	1163 -15%	4496 228%	1049 -23%
Write 4K Q32T1	532	535 1%	519 -2%	661 24%	494.4 -7%
Read 4K Q32T1	627	608 -3%	302.7 -52%	712 14%	569 -9%
Write Seq Q32T1	3017	3242 7%	981 -67%	1540 -49%	3017 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	3440	3617 5%	1983 -42%	6806 98%	3542 3%
AS SSD		14%	-45%	39%	1%
Seq Read	2849	3020 6%	1659 -42%	5150 81%	2470 -13%
Seq Write	2831	2631 -7%	921 -67%	3920 38%	2473 -13%
4K Read	51.3	60.3 18%	51 -1%	46.6 -9%	50.2 -2%
4K Write	106.3	171.6 61%	120.1 13%	145.8 37%	124.4 17%
4K-64 Read	1763	1410 -20%	463.5 -74%	2071 17%	1711 -3%
4K-64 Write	2010	2324 16%	909 -55%	3267 63%	1848 -8%
Access Time Read *	0.093	0.045 52%	0.179 -92%	0.078 16%	0.039 58%
Access Time Write *	0.035	0.024 31%	0.032 9%	0.029 17%	0.029 17%
Score Read	2099	1773 -16%	680 -68%	2633 25%	2008 -4%
Score Write	2399	2759 15%	1121 -53%	2805 17%	2220 -7%
Score Total	5573	5429 -3%	2130 -62%	7716 38%	5257 -6%
Copy ISO MB/s	1601			3190 99%	1909 19%
Copy Program MB/s	645			987 53%	588 -9%
Copy Game MB/s	1328			2096 58%	975 -27%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		22% / 20%	-37% / -38%	51% / 47%	-4% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The actual performance of an RTX-3000 graphics core depends on the maximum TGP that a notebook manufacturer chooses within the limits defined by Nvidia. Medion grants the GeForce-RTX-3070-Laptop-GPU (Overview of all RTX-3070 laptops including the TGPs) the possible TGP maximum of 140 watts (125 watts + 15 watts Dynamic Boost).

The 3DMark results are on an average level compared with the RTX 3070 notebooks tested so far. The Erazer does not quite reach the results of the MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG even when the TGP is fully enabled manually (see comparison table) - an indication that the Dynamic Boost is not used much or not at all. This is also confirmed by the Witcher 3 test. For cross-checking, we only ran the "FurMark" tool and were able to measure the maximum TGP of 140 watts.

The integrated UHD Graphics 630-GPU is active and the notebook works with Nvidia's Optimus switching graphics solution. Both iGPU and dGPU could be disabled. The BIOS of the computer offers three options: "MSHybrid" (= Optimus), "iGPU Only" (= UHD Graphics 630), "dGPU Only" (= RTX 3070).

Fire Strike (mains operation, overboost, TGP 140W)

3DMark 11 Performance		24901 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		41008 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		20220 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		9251 points
Help

... in comparison

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	38275 Points ∼100% +12%
Aorus 17G YD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	36043 Points ∼94% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP 140W)	35566 Points ∼93% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	34071 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (20039 - 38275, n=40)	33144 Points ∼87% -3%
Average of class Gaming (1925 - 45050, n=211, last 2 years)	28990 Points ∼76% -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	27153 Points ∼71% -20%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	29128 Points ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	27968 Points ∼96% +8%
Aorus 17G YD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	27275 Points ∼94% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP 140W)	26507 Points ∼91% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	25849 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (16628 - 29128, n=39)	24591 Points ∼84% -5%
Average of class Gaming (1360 - 34993, n=230, last 2 years)	21781 Points ∼75% -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	21446 Points ∼74% -17%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	10898 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H	10850 Points ∼100% +13%
Aorus 17G YD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	10144 Points ∼93% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP 140W)	10018 Points ∼92% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H	9619 Points ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (6059 - 11019, n=40)	9462 Points ∼87% -2%
Average of class Gaming (429 - 13455, n=232, last 2 years)	8421 Points ∼77% -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H	7837 Points ∼72% -19%

Gaming performance

The computer brings all current games smoothly to the screen. The full screen resolution (2,560 x 1,440 pixels) and high to maximum quality settings can usually be selected.

Compared with the RTX 3070 notebooks tested so far, the Beast X20 does decently and delivers (slightly) above-average frame rates. Manually setting the TGP to the maximum of 140 watts lets the rates increase a bit more.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	109 (83^min) fps ∼100% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	107 (35.2^min, 48.1^P0.1, 67.3^P1 - 207^max) fps ∼98% +4%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	106 (43.4^min, 50.9^P0.1, 68.2^P1 - 195^max) fps ∼97% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	103 (33.5^min, 51.4^P0.1, 68^P1 - 190^max) fps ∼94%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	101 fps ∼93% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (73.5 - 109, n=40)	92.7 fps ∼85% -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	92.5 fps ∼85% -10%
Average of class Gaming (30 - 128, n=229, last 2 years)	83.3 fps ∼76% -19%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	130 (114.3^min) fps ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	128 (112.9^min) fps ∼98% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (103 - 158, n=41)	120.2 fps ∼92% +5%
Average of class Gaming (22 - 159, n=213, last 2 years)	120 fps ∼92% +4%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	117 (101.8^min) fps ∼90% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	117 (102^min) fps ∼90% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	115 (99.6^min) fps ∼88%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	82.9 fps ∼100% +19%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	80.2 fps ∼97% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (62.7 - 105, n=43)	78.1 fps ∼94% +12%
Average of class Gaming (13.7 - 117.5, n=213, last 2 years)	78.1 fps ∼94% +12%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	75.8 fps ∼91% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	71.8 fps ∼87% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	69.9 fps ∼84%

Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP 140W)	174 (82.8^min, 129^P1 - 345^max) fps ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	168 (84.4^min, 126^P1 - 285^max) fps ∼97%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (105 - 194, n=31)	163.3 fps ∼94% -3%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	163 (119^min, 123^P1 - 273^max) fps ∼94% -3%
Average of class Gaming (10.9 - 221, n=141, last 2 years)	153.7 fps ∼88% -9%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP 140W)	131 (81.3^min, 104^P1 - 238^max) fps ∼100% +4%
Average of class Gaming (34.8 - 165, n=43, last 2 years)	126.9 fps ∼97% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	126 (68.1^min, 98.7^P1 - 269^max) fps ∼96%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (82.3 - 137.3, n=11)	118.4 fps ∼90% -6%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP 140W)	95 fps ∼100% +4%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	93.8 fps ∼99% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)	91.6 fps ∼96%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	90.2 fps ∼95% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (62 - 107, n=33)	87.6 fps ∼92% -4%
Average of class Gaming (15.4 - 131, n=151, last 2 years)	85.2 fps ∼90% -7%
2560x1440 High Quality
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP 140W)	74.2 fps ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)	71.5 fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming (10.9 - 93.3, n=55, last 2 years)	71.4 fps ∼96% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (49.1 - 78.2, n=15)	66.7 fps ∼90% -7%

GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	97 (8.76^min, 66.7^P1 - 172^max) fps ∼100% +10%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	95.7 (17.9^min, 66.7^P1 - 174^max) fps ∼99% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	90.4 (15.6^min, 62.5^P1 - 172^max) fps ∼93% +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (72.6 - 114, n=35)	90.4 fps ∼93% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	88.5 (16.4^min, 58.8^P1 - 182^max) fps ∼91%
Average of class Gaming (4.18 - 126.3, n=155, last 2 years)	87.6 fps ∼90% -1%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming (30 - 111, n=41, last 2 years)	85.1 fps ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	83.4 (21.4^min, 55.6^P1 - 158^max) fps ∼98%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	83 (20.4^min, 58.8^P1 - 167^max) fps ∼98% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (70.8 - 94.4, n=11)	79.6 fps ∼94% -5%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	114 fps ∼100% +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	110 (86^min - 136^max) fps ∼96% +5%
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	108 (79^min - 136^max) fps ∼95% +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (89 - 126, n=28)	105.8 fps ∼93% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	105 (80^min - 131^max) fps ∼92%
Average of class Gaming (12 - 146, n=133, last 2 years)	102.4 fps ∼90% -2%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming (52 - 124, n=44, last 2 years)	97.4 fps ∼100% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	97 (79^min - 112^max) fps ∼100% +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (81 - 101, n=12)	90.4 fps ∼93% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	90 (77^min - 103^max) fps ∼92%

Dirt 5
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU	87.5 (58.8^min, 65.7^P0.1, 71.2^P1 - 139.1^max) fps ∼100% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (86.1)	86.1 (53^min, 60.3^P0.1, 68.3^P1 - 129.4^max) fps ∼98% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	82.6 (49.2^min, 56.2^P0.1, 64.9^P1 - 127.7^max) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (50 - 96, n=10)	76.8 fps ∼88% -7%
Average of class Gaming (12.4 - 117, n=41, last 2 years)	70.6 fps ∼81% -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q	65.1 (49.9^min, 52.3^P0.1, 55.3^P1 - 88.3^max) fps ∼74% -21%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)	72.4 (50.5^min, 54.7^P0.1, 59.7^P1 - 116.1^max) fps ∼100% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU	67.5 (41.1^min, 47.8^P0.1, 53^P1 - 124.5^max) fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (58.6 - 75, n=5)	67.1 fps ∼93% -1%
Average of class Gaming (11.4 - 96.5, n=18, last 2 years)	63.4 fps ∼88% -6%

To check whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a longer period, we run the game "The Witcher 3" for about 60 minutes with Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The game character is not moved. A drop in the frame rates is not noticed.