Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Medion Erazer Beast X20 (Tongfang GM7MG7P) in review: Thin gaming notebook with good battery runtimes

A round thing. The compact Erazer Beast X20 scores with a Core-i7-10870H processor, GeForce-RTX-3070 laptop GPU, 32 GB of RAM (dual-channel mode), space for two NVMe SSDs, and a responsive WQHD display (IPS, 165 Hz). The metal chassis used has proven to be very stable.
Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...

The Medion Erazer Beast X20 belongs to the class of 17.3-inch gaming notebooks. Like the almost identical predecessor, the current model is also based on a barebone from the company Tongfang (GM7MG7P). The competitors include devices like the Schenker XMG Neo 17 the Aorus 17G YD and the MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 
Medion Erazer Beast X20 (Erazer Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-10870H 8 x 2.2 - 5 GHz, 60 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU - 8192 MB, Core: 1560 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 140 W TDP + 15 W Dynamic Boost, 27.21.14.6677, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, Dual-Channel-Mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4, 2048 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280-Slots (NVMe), 1770 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC274 @ Intel Comet Point-H PCH - cAVS
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Mic-in, Headset-out, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 23 x 395 x 262 ( = 0.91 x 15.55 x 10.31 in)
Battery
91 Wh, 7900 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (Trial), Microsoft Office 365 (Trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.246 kg ( = 79.23 oz / 4.95 pounds), Power Supply: 500 g ( = 17.64 oz / 1.1 pounds)
Price
2299 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Rating Version
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
86 %
07/2021
Medion Erazer Beast X20
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg23 mm17.30"2560x1440
85 %
01/2021
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
85 %
03/2021
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.9 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
86 %
06/2021
Aorus 17G YD
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case - The X20 comes with a metal chassis

Medion relies on the chic, matte-black metal case for the X20, which we already know from the X10. There is only a small difference between the chassis: The webcam is located below the display in the X10, and above the display in the X20. Both chassis have a slim display bezel. The innards can be accessed after removing the bottom shell. The battery is permanently installed.

The notebook is well manufactured. The gaps are correct and there are no material protrusions. Stability and rigidity are pleasing: The base unit cannot be twisted, the lid to a small extent. However, the latter is completely within limits. Pressure on the lid's back doesn't lead to image changes. The hinges keep the lid firmly in position. The maximum opening angle is around 130 degrees. Opening the lid with one hand is possible.

Within our comparison field, the Erazer represents the most compact and lightest device.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Size comparison

405 mm / 15.9 inch 276 mm / 10.9 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.8 kg6.22 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 2.9 kg6.39 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 261 mm / 10.3 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 2.5 kg5.55 lbs394.8 mm / 15.5 inch 261.8 mm / 10.3 inch 24.6 mm / 0.969 inch 2.3 kg4.98 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.2 kg4.95 lbs

Features - The Erazer Beast does not have Thunderbolt

While the USB-C slot of the Erazer Beast X10 supports Thunderbolt 3, the corresponding slot of the X20 "only" works with the USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard. The latter offers DisplayPort via USB-C. Thus, the laptop has two video outputs together with the HDMI 2.1 slot, three USB-A ports (2x USB 3.1 Gen 1, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2), two audio jacks (headphone output, microphone input), a Gigabit Ethernet slot, and an opening for a cable lock.

Left side: Slot for a cable lock, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type A), microphone input, headphone output
Left side: Slot for a cable lock, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type A), microphone input, headphone output
Right side: memory card reader (MicroSD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type A)
Right side: memory card reader (MicroSD), 2x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type A)
Rear: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type C; Displayport), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, power connector
Rear: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type C; Displayport), HDMI 2.1, Gigabit Ethernet, power connector

SDCardreader

The microSD memory card reader (reference card: AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) belongs to the medium-fast models with maximum transfer rates of 64 MB/s (transfer of 250 jpg image files with around 5 MB each) and 77 MB/s (copying large data blocks).

SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
192 MB/s ∼100% +200%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=93, last 2 years)
115 MB/s ∼60% +80%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼43% +30%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
64 MB/s ∼33%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G YD
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
197 MB/s ∼100% +156%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 257, n=93, last 2 years)
129 MB/s ∼65% +68%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90 MB/s ∼46% +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s ∼39%

Communication

The WLAN chip (Intel AX201) supports the 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax standards and offers Bluetooth 5 functionality. The data rates determined under optimal conditions (no other WLAN devices in the near vicinity, short distance between notebook and server PC) turn out good to very good. Wired network connections are handled by a Gigabit Ethernet chip (RTL8125) from Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1369 (693min - 1436max) MBit/s ∼100% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1351 (1239min - 1420max) MBit/s ∼99%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1350 MBit/s ∼99% 0%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1310 MBit/s ∼96% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1180 MBit/s ∼86% -13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=263)
1156 MBit/s ∼84% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (301 - 1645, n=160, last 2 years)
1131 MBit/s ∼83% -16%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1480 MBit/s ∼100% +45%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1370 MBit/s ∼93% +34%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 MBit/s ∼86% +24%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=263)
1248 MBit/s ∼84% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=160, last 2 years)
1197 MBit/s ∼81% +17%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1169 (619min - 1217max) MBit/s ∼79% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1021 (947min - 1109max) MBit/s ∼69%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400108510311058100010311025108410451062101610279799751023101598110031007105810391109977997998995947101097810221049619118311671205117412171179117911211107112511581175115811581132118011711167117611831180114711801161117311621146117511691085103110581000103110251084104510621016102797997510231015981100310071058103911099779979989959471010978102210496191183116712051174121711791179112111071125115811751158115811321180117111671176118311801147118011611173116211461175116913031327123912631395135313761317139413471417131713641313137412951368133214001380135813451365136313971353138313121420135769313731341136913171372134514321346141414201388137213821396137614361210134214271404114713191396137013881412140913661407Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1021 (947-1109)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1148 (619-1217)
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1351 (1239-1420)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1346 (693-1436)

Webcam

The webcam (0.9 MP) produces pictures in a maximum resolution of 1,280 x 720 pixels. The color accuracy is a problem. With a color deviation of almost 16, the target (DeltaE less than 3) is missed very clearly.

ColorChecker
31.3 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
32.4 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
26 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
18.7 ∆E
16.6 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
21 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
21.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804: 19.69 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 32.41 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
19 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
16 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Medion Erazer Beast X20: 15.51 ∆E min: 7.96 - max: 22.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
17.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
15 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
12 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
16 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
13 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H): 13.98 ∆E min: 4.53 - max: 18.6 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.5 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
ColorChecker MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG: 8.71 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 14.49 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.4 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
8 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 17G YD: 6.79 ∆E min: 2.11 - max: 15.47 ∆E

Accessories

The notebook comes with the usual documents: a quick start guide and warranty information.

Maintenance

After removing all screws on the bottom of the device, the bottom tray of our test device can be removed quite easily. You might need a joint smoother or a thin spatula to remove the bottom shell in other models. After that, there is access to the working memory banks (both occupied), the two M.2-2280 slots (one occupied), the WLAN module, the fans, the BIOS battery and the battery.

Hardware Erazer Beast X20
Hardware Erazer Beast X20

Warranty

Medion grants the Erazer a two-year warranty. Warranty extensions are not available.

Input devices - Keyboard with RGB lighting

Keyboard

The concave keys of the illuminated chiclet keyboard offer a short stroke and a clear pressure point. The resistance could be a bit crisper for our taste. Good: The keyboard does not bounce during typing. The four-level key illumination (RGB) is controlled via two function keys. All in all, Medion delivers a keyboard that is suitable for everyday use.

Touchpad

A multitouch-capable ClickPad (approx. 13.2 x 7.5 cm/~5.2 x 3.0 in) serves as a mouse replacement. Its smooth surface makes it easy for the fingers to glide. The pad also responds to inputs in the corners. It offers a short stroke and a clear pressure point.

Input devices Erazer Beast X20
Input devices Erazer Beast X20

Display - 165 Hz IPS

While the average brightness (340.7 cd/m²) of the matte 17.3-inch screen (1,920 x 1,080 pixels) meets the target (> 300 cd/m²), the contrast (881:1) is a bit too low. We consider values beyond 1000:1 to be good. The 165 Hz panel has short response times and does not exhibit PWM flickering.

368
cd/m²
356
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
304
cd/m²
328
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 370 cd/m² Average: 340.7 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 370 cd/m²
Contrast: 881:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.76 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.3
ΔE Greyscale 1.8 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
71.35% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.01% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.11% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.176
Medion Erazer Beast X20
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Chi Mei CMN176E, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Aorus 17G YD
Sharp LQ173M1JW04, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
LG Phillips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
0%
-6%
2%
-6%
Display P3 Coverage
70.11
70.46
0%
64.74
-8%
72.32
3%
64.49
-8%
sRGB Coverage
99.01
99.47
0%
96.41
-3%
100
1%
95.62
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.35
71.85
1%
66.86
-6%
73.7
3%
65.59
-8%
Response Times
-5%
21%
10%
3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
16 (8.4, 7.6)
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-5%
7.4 (3.8, 3.6)
54%
13.6 (6.8, 6.8)
15%
14.4 (7.6, 6.8)
10%
Response Time Black / White *
9.6 (4.4, 5.2)
10 (4, 6)
-4%
10.8 (5.6, 5.2)
-13%
9.2 (5.2, 4)
4%
10 (5.2, 4.8)
-4%
PWM Frequency
24510 (39)
Screen
-13%
-5%
-23%
-46%
Brightness middle
370
410
11%
328
-11%
286
-23%
313
-15%
Brightness
341
381
12%
314
-8%
282
-17%
297
-13%
Brightness Distribution
82
88
7%
87
6%
73
-11%
88
7%
Black Level *
0.42
0.37
12%
0.29
31%
0.24
43%
0.27
36%
Contrast
881
1108
26%
1131
28%
1192
35%
1159
32%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.76
2.55
-45%
1.93
-10%
2.79
-59%
2.96
-68%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
2.88
4.33
-50%
4.94
-72%
6.23
-116%
9.83
-241%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.3
1.28
2%
0.68
48%
0.82
37%
1.03
21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
1.8
3.4
-89%
2.8
-56%
3.5
-94%
4.9
-172%
Gamma
2.176 101%
2.275 97%
2.18 101%
2.358 93%
2.187 101%
CCT
6543 99%
6637 98%
7023 93%
6147 106%
7559 86%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
72
67
74
66
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
95
89
96
89
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-6% / -9%
3% / -1%
-4% / -13%
-16% / -30%

* ... smaller is better

The screen shows a good color reproduction in its state of delivery and meets the target with a color deviation of just under 1.8 (Delta E less than 3). It does not suffer from a blue cast. Slight improvements can be achieved with a calibration. The deviation drops to 1.3 and the grayscale levels are displayed more balanced. The sRGB color space is reproduced to 99%, the AdobeRGB color space to 71%.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: Color saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
Medion Erazer Beast X20 vs sRGB
Medion Erazer Beast X20 vs sRGB
Subpixel
Subpixel
Medion Erazer Beast X20 vs AdobeRGB
Medion Erazer Beast X20 vs AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
9.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.4 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
16 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Outdoor reading of the display is possible when the sun does not shine too brightly.

The Erazer outdoors
The Erazer outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Eight-core power

Medion's Erazer Beast X20 is a 17.3-inch gaming notebook that brings every current game smoothly to the screen.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Nvidia System Info

Test conditions

The pre-installed Control Center allows choosing a performance profile ("Balanced", "Enthusiast", "Overboost"), among other things. We used the "Enthusiast" profile and the automatic fan control. The battery tests were performed with the "Balanced" profile active. A button next to the power button allows quick switching between the performance profiles.

Balanced Enthusiast Overboost
Power Limit 1 35 Watt 60 Watt 75 Watt
Power Limit 2 35 Watt 60 Watt 75 Watt

Five subprofiles can - but do not have to - be defined for each of the three performance profiles. For example, the CPU's power limits, the GPU's TGP and/or the temperature upper limits could be adjusted to individual usage scenarios.

Processor

The Core i7-10870H eight-core processor (Comet Lake) works with a base clock of 2.2 GHz. An increase to 4.2 GHz (eight cores) to 5 GHz (one core) is possible via Turbo. Hyperthreading (two threads per core) is supported.

The processor runs the CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark with 2.2 to 3.8 GHz (multi-thread) and 4 to 4.7 GHz (single-thread). In battery mode, the CPU runs at 2.3 to 2.5 GHz (multi-thread) and 1.8 to 3.8 GHz (single-thread).

Despite two additional CPU cores, the Core i7 achieves roughly the same test results as the one in the Erazer Beast X10, a Core i7-10750H six-core processor (Comet Lake). The relatively low power limits are responsible for this. The power limits would have to be increased via the Control Center for more multi-thread performance. This has hardly any impact on the single-thread performance.

The CPU remains stable at maximum power limits (PL1/PL2: 120 watts). We additionally ran some benchmarks under these conditions. The results can be found in the comparison tables.

Multi-thread (network operation)
Multi-thread (network operation)
Single thread (network operation)
Single thread (network operation)

We check whether the CPU Turbo is used permanently in mains operation by running the multi-thread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark in a loop for at least 30 minutes. The Turbo is used on medium level. Increasing the power limits to 120 watts causes the Turbo clock to increase.

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901336.011322.141320.791322.81322.971321.961314.411322.311322.141326.791320.611319.441325.251324.241325.031321.621318.131321.751319.781320.791318.781318.611321.091318.521319.831322.11325.341322.141321.831318.741322.451310.361322.311322.311313.51319.391321.7513191318.911318.571681.871616.811613.941620.091624.891627.011623.441626.151623.051624.761620.811621.471620.681627.411626.881623.641620.751628.131620.881619.961623.511622.321624.51618.581624.371630.321616.491625.091622.651619.891624.31622.451623.511622.261622.651626.151626.881625.091628.271621.82108.482088.662082.682069.322064.32049.52071.042042.92067.722036.872052.762071.042062.712068.472056.132063.452044.572064.22059.412044.572059.412044.572052.762049.392057.821152.61164.521135.851136.041141.781125.41122.111129.621113.241129.081136.591118.691243.391245.721213.221240.621247.51250.741243.21251.131257.821251.411248.131250.781254.042089.212057.31924.281934.421930.041946.191935.921949.221915.621928.551955.131915.621958.191925.671937.421930.131956.661927.151964.151940.241944.671941.841934.421921.411950.651944.771915.621930.131944.671955.131931.531915.621928.641938.831950.741943.261928.641931.531919.941937.421364.111350.531332.271339.231342.731339.231342.781352.681354.11349.121343.451342.731337.171342.731351.951359.111354.11344.91347.711345.531351.211346.981339.231351.261351.211337.841345.531343.451339.941350.531349.81347.711343.451347.711349.121339.231355.521356.251347.661342.06Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H: Ø1321 (1310.36-1336.01)
Medion Erazer Beast X20 Intel Core i7-10870H; PL1/2 120W: Ø1625 (1613.94-1681.87)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2061 (2036.87-2108.48)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1192 (1113.24-1257.82)
Aorus 17G YD Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1943 (1915.62-2089.21)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1347 (1332.27-1364.11)
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
201 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1336 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
147.07 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Help
Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
81.2 pt ∼81%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
78.7 pt ∼79%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
68 pt ∼68%
Average of class Gaming
 
66 pt ∼66%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
 
65.1 pt ∼65%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
59.5 pt ∼60%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 -2!
Intel Core i7-10750H
58 pt ∼58%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG -2!
Intel Core i7-10750H
56.1 pt ∼56%
Cinebench R23
CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1497 Points ∼100% +22%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1403 Points ∼94% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1095 - 1619, n=80, last 2 years)
1359 Points ∼91% +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1227 Points ∼82%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
1227 Points ∼82% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1177 - 1253, n=12)
1223 Points ∼82% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1136 Points ∼76% -7%
CPU (Multi Core)
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
12862 Points ∼100% +56%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
11739 Points ∼91% +42%
Average of class Gaming
  (4621 - 14363, n=81, last 2 years)
10765 Points ∼84% +30%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
10215 Points ∼79% +24%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (8250 - 10450, n=12)
9594 Points ∼75% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
8250 Points ∼64%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
7965 Points ∼62% -3%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
541 Points ∼100% +15%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
540 Points ∼100% +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (312 - 634, n=187, last 2 years)
495 Points ∼91% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
476 Points ∼88% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (460 - 484, n=12)
474 Points ∼88% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
470 Points ∼87%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
460 Points ∼85% -2%
CPU (Multi Core)
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
4818 Points ∼100% +59%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4510 Points ∼94% +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
3910 Points ∼81% +29%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 6321, n=188, last 2 years)
3699 Points ∼77% +22%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (3027 - 4020, n=12)
3588 Points ∼74% +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
3027 Points ∼63%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
2998 Points ∼62% -1%
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
232 Points ∼100% +15%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points ∼98% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
201 Points ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (196 - 204, n=11)
200 Points ∼86% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 254, n=196, last 2 years)
200 Points ∼86% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
199 Points ∼86% -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
198 Points ∼85% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
196 Points ∼84% -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2108 (2036.87min - 2108.48max) Points ∼100% +58%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
2089 Points ∼99% +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
1682 Points ∼80% +26%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1336 - 1740, n=14)
1614 Points ∼77% +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 2804, n=208, last 2 years)
1571 Points ∼75% +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1364 Points ∼65% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1336 Points ∼63%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
1258 (1113.24min - 1257.82max) Points ∼60% -6%
Blender 2.79 - BMW27 CPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds * ∼100% -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
333 Seconds * ∼93%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
322 Seconds * ∼90% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (179 - 633, n=167, last 2 years)
318 Seconds * ∼89% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (272 - 333, n=12)
298 Seconds * ∼83% +11%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
284.1 Seconds * ∼79% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
273 Seconds * ∼76% +18%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
245 Seconds * ∼68% +26%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5590 MIPS ∼100% +5%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
5547 MIPS ∼99% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
5343 MIPS ∼96% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
5321 MIPS ∼95%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (5145 - 5429, n=12)
5293 MIPS ∼95% -1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
5236 MIPS ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2945 - 6174, n=168, last 2 years)
5218 MIPS ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
5191 MIPS ∼93% -2%
7z b 4
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
57284 MIPS ∼100% +45%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
48261 MIPS ∼84% +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
46708 MIPS ∼82% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (39581 - 46708, n=12)
44452 MIPS ∼78% +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (15146 - 75612, n=168, last 2 years)
44361 MIPS ∼77% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
39581 MIPS ∼69%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
37082 MIPS ∼65% -6%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
36161 MIPS ∼63% -9%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
1583 Points ∼100% +33%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1354 Points ∼86% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
1331 Points ∼84% +12%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
1304 Points ∼82% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1777, n=166, last 2 years)
1302 Points ∼82% +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
1287 Points ∼81% +8%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (1191 - 1295, n=12)
1273 Points ∼80% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1191 Points ∼75%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
9317 Points ∼100% +46%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
8035 Points ∼86% +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
7755 Points ∼83% +21%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (6403 - 7882, n=12)
7482 Points ∼80% +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 11393, n=166, last 2 years)
7147 Points ∼77% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
6652 Points ∼71% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
6403 Points ∼69%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
6392 Points ∼69% 0%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.8 fps ∼100% +48%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.6 fps ∼99% +46%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
13.2 fps ∼84% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (10.7 - 13.5, n=12)
12.2 fps ∼77% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.4 - 19.8, n=167, last 2 years)
12.2 fps ∼77% +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
11.6 fps ∼73% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
10.7 fps ∼68%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.4 fps ∼66% -3%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=159, last 2 years)
54.4 s * ∼100% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (46 - 64.4, n=12)
53.7 s * ∼99% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
52.2 s * ∼96%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
51.3 s * ∼94% +2%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
50.9 s * ∼94% +2%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
50.8 s * ∼93% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
48.36 s * ∼89% +7%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
39 s * ∼72% +25%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.6 sec * ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
0.594 sec * ∼99% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.593 sec * ∼99% +1%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.592 sec * ∼99% +1%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H
  (0.573 - 0.614, n=12)
0.591 sec * ∼99% +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.4907 - 1.088, n=162, last 2 years)
0.584 sec * ∼97% +3%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.558 sec * ∼93% +7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.512 sec * ∼85% +15%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The nimble and smoothly working system offers enough computing power for performance demanding applications like gaming for years. This is complemented by good PCMark results.

Two working memory banks are available.
Two working memory banks are available.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4011 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6129 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5405 points
PCMark 10 Score
5908 points
Help
PCMark 10
Score
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7073 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6983 Points ∼99% +18%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (5660 - 6630, n=8)
6230 Points ∼88% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
6207 Points ∼88% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (3952 - 7884, n=176, last 2 years)
6063 Points ∼86% +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
6017 Points ∼85% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
5908 Points ∼84%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5581 Points ∼79% -6%
Essentials
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10295 Points ∼100% +20%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10051 Points ∼98% +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11266, n=174, last 2 years)
9612 Points ∼93% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9209 Points ∼89% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (8609 - 9518, n=8)
9120 Points ∼89% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
8829 Points ∼86% +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8652 Points ∼84% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
8609 Points ∼84%
Productivity
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9259 Points ∼100% +19%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
8849 Points ∼96% +14%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
8657 Points ∼93% +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
8383 Points ∼91% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (5813 - 10066, n=174, last 2 years)
8206 Points ∼89% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7012 - 8741, n=8)
8032 Points ∼87% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
7771 Points ∼84%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
7415 Points ∼80% -5%
Digital Content Creation
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10389 Points ∼100% +24%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10075 Points ∼97% +20%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (7831 - 10130, n=8)
8816 Points ∼85% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H (PL1/2 120W)
8766 Points ∼84% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
8367 Points ∼81%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
7893 Points ∼76% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 12250, n=174, last 2 years)
7822 Points ∼75% -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6912 Points ∼67% -17%
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5265 Points ∼100% +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (2832 - 6277, n=90, last 2 years)
4564 Points ∼87% +14%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (4011 - 4792, n=4)
4384 Points ∼83% +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4350 Points ∼83% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
4011 Points ∼76%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
7104 Points ∼100% +31%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5792 Points ∼82% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4265 - 7104, n=90, last 2 years)
5673 Points ∼80% +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (4878 - 6300, n=4)
5638 Points ∼79% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
5405 Points ∼76%

DPC latencies

The standardized latency monitor test (web surfing, 4K video playback, Prime95 high-load) revealed conspicuous DPC latencies. The system does not seem to be suitable for real-time video and audio editing.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1820.7 μs * ∼100% -116%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
1082 μs * ∼59% -28%
Aorus 17G YD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1063.6 μs * ∼58% -26%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
843.5 μs * ∼46%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
787 μs * ∼43% +7%

* ... smaller is better

The overclocking of the working memory would be possible

The BIOS of the computer offers the possibility of memory overclocking. The whole thing is done at your own risk. Possible damage would be the owner's responsibility. However, the corresponding overclocking option has to be enabled via the Control Center first.

Mass storage

An NVMe SSD (M.2-2280) from Phison serves as the system drive. It provides 2 TB of storage space and delivers very good transfer rates. The notebook still has room for a second NVMe-SSD.

The notebook offers space for two NVMe SSDs.
The notebook offers space for two NVMe SSDs.
Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3440 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3017 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 626.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 532.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 1371 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 1591 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 47.96 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 155.5 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB
Aorus 17G YD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
29%
-29%
62%
-8%
Write 4K
155.5
206.1
33%
143.7
-8%
227.4
46%
151
-3%
Read 4K
47.96
53
11%
45.1
-6%
91.28
90%
49.29
3%
Write Seq
1591
3018
90%
978.2
-39%
2241
41%
1109
-30%
Read Seq
1371
2575
88%
1163
-15%
4496
228%
1049
-23%
Write 4K Q32T1
532.2
535.2
1%
519.1
-2%
660.6
24%
494.4
-7%
Read 4K Q32T1
626.6
607.6
-3%
302.7
-52%
711.5
14%
568.5
-9%
Write Seq Q32T1
3017
3242
7%
980.7
-67%
1540
-49%
3017
0%
Read Seq Q32T1
3440
3617
5%
1983
-42%
6806
98%
3542
3%
AS SSD
14%
-45%
39%
1%
Seq Read
2848.5
3019.89
6%
1658.71
-42%
5150.38
81%
2470.07
-13%
Seq Write
2831.42
2631.23
-7%
921.32
-67%
3920.13
38%
2472.91
-13%
4K Read
51.28
60.35
18%
51.03
0%
46.6
-9%
50.23
-2%
4K Write
106.31
171.59
61%
120.1
13%
145.76
37%
124.39
17%
4K-64 Read
1762.89
1410.3
-20%
463.54
-74%
2071.25
17%
1711.12
-3%
4K-64 Write
2009.98
2324.17
16%
908.68
-55%
3267.27
63%
1847.98
-8%
Access Time Read *
0.093
0.045
52%
0.179
-92%
0.078
16%
0.039
58%
Access Time Write *
0.035
0.024
31%
0.032
9%
0.029
17%
0.029
17%
Score Read
2099
1773
-16%
680
-68%
2633
25%
2008
-4%
Score Write
2399
2759
15%
1121
-53%
2805
17%
2220
-7%
Score Total
5573
5429
-3%
2130
-62%
7716
38%
5257
-6%
Copy ISO MB/s
1601.45
3190.41
99%
1908.65
19%
Copy Program MB/s
645.4
986.86
53%
587.88
-9%
Copy Game MB/s
1327.91
2096.31
58%
975
-27%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
22% / 20%
-37% / -38%
51% / 47%
-4% / -2%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0340680102013601700204023802720306034003740408044204760510054405780612064602740.143331.283332.373335.943336.363336.363337.23337.413337.833338.253338.463338.673338.883339.713339.713340.343340.553340.553340.763340.943340.973341.033341.183341.63341.63342.233342.233342.233342.443343.073343.913344.123344.123344.333344.333344.543344.773345.193345.83345.83346.433346.433346.843347.053347.263347.263347.283351.673353.773356.283355.233565.373565.793566356635663566356635663566.213566.213566.213566.213566.213566.213566.423566.423566.423566.633566.633566.633566.633566.843566.843566.843566.843567.053567.053567.053567.053567.053567.053567.263567.263567.473567.473567.473567.473567.473567.473567.673567.883567.883567.883567.883567.883567.883567.883569.143569.141865.421971.111982.651982.861983.281983.281983.281983.491983.71983.711983.711983.911984.121984.151984.331984.331984.531984.551984.761984.761985.181985.181985.181985.181985.181985.181985.391985.391985.391985.391985.391985.61985.61985.61985.61985.61985.61985.61985.811985.811985.811986.021986.021986.021986.021986.021986.021986.021986.221986.646517.296621.136623.646624.696625.116626.586626.796627.426629.16629.16629.526631.46633.296633.926634.136637.916638.126638.126647.346728.56729.556730.816731.866732.496733.336733.546733.966734.376735673567356735.426735.636735.846736.056736.266736.896737.316737.316737.526737.736738.366739.26739.416739.836739.836740.886741.36741.926743.182978.293369.883373.693374.113376.373377.213377.423378.263378.933380.143383.133385.583386.423386.843387.673388.093388.513389.773389.983389.983389.983390.813391.093391.863392.143393.193393.333393.333393.333393.823393.953394.873395.213395.293396.053396.053396.473396.673396.763396.883397.723397.933397.933398.773398.983401.163401.493403.3734043409.34Tooltip
Medion Erazer Beast X20 GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Phison E12S-2TB-Phison-SSD-BICS4: Ø3330 (2740.14-3356.28)
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H) GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø3563 (3355.23-3569.14)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-10750H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB: Ø1982 (1865.42-1986.64)
Aorus 17G YD GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ: Ø6694 (6517.29-6743.18)
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10750H, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR: Ø3383 (2978.29-3409.34)

Graphics card

The actual performance of an RTX-3000 graphics core depends on the maximum TGP that a notebook manufacturer chooses within the limits defined by Nvidia. Medion grants the GeForce-RTX-3070-Laptop-GPU (Overview of all RTX-3070 laptops including the TGPs) the possible TGP maximum of 140 watts (125 watts + 15 watts Dynamic Boost).

The 3DMark results are on an average level compared with the RTX 3070 notebooks tested so far. The Erazer does not quite reach the results of the MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG even when the TGP is fully enabled manually (see comparison table) - an indication that the Dynamic Boost is not used much or not at all. This is also confirmed by the Witcher 3 test. For cross-checking, we only ran the "FurMark" tool and were able to measure the maximum TGP of 140 watts.

The integrated UHD Graphics 630-GPU is active and the notebook works with Nvidia's Optimus switching graphics solution. Both iGPU and dGPU could be disabled. The BIOS of the computer offers three options: "MSHybrid" (= Optimus), "iGPU Only" (= UHD Graphics 630), "dGPU Only" (= RTX 3070).

Fire Strike (mains operation)
Fire Strike (mains operation)
Fire Strike (mains operation, overboost, TGP 140W)
Fire Strike (mains operation, overboost, TGP 140W)
Fire Strike (battery operation)
Fire Strike (battery operation)
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP 140W)
Fire Strike Ultra (Overboost, TGP 140W)
Time Spy (Overboost, TGP 140W)
Time Spy (Overboost, TGP 140W)
Port Royal (Overboost, TGP 140W)
Port Royal (Overboost, TGP 140W)
3DMark 11 Performance
24901 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
41008 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
20220 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
9251 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
38275 Points ∼100% +12%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
36043 Points ∼94% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP 140W)
35566 Points ∼93% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
34071 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (20039 - 38275, n=28)
32793 Points ∼86% -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
27153 Points ∼71% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1925 - 43077, n=187, last 2 years)
26455 Points ∼69% -22%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
29128 Points ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
27968 Points ∼96% +8%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
27275 Points ∼94% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP 140W)
26507 Points ∼91% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
25849 Points ∼89%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (16628 - 29128, n=27)
24374 Points ∼84% -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
21446 Points ∼74% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1360 - 34993, n=195, last 2 years)
19942 Points ∼68% -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
10898 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10750H
10850 Points ∼100% +13%
Aorus 17G YD
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10144 Points ∼93% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H (Overboost, TGP 140W)
10018 Points ∼92% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-10870H
9619 Points ∼88%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (6059 - 11019, n=28)
9343 Points ∼86% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10750H
7837 Points ∼72% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (429 - 13210, n=198, last 2 years)
7628 Points ∼70% -21%

Gaming performance

The computer brings all current games smoothly to the screen. The full screen resolution (2,560 x 1,440 pixels) and high to maximum quality settings can usually be selected.

Compared with the RTX 3070 notebooks tested so far, the Beast X20 does decently and delivers (slightly) above-average frame rates. Manually setting the TGP to the maximum of 140 watts lets the rates increase a bit more.

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
109 (83min) fps ∼100% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
107 (35.2min, 48.1P0.1, 67.3P1 - 207max) fps ∼98% +4%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
106 (43.4min, 50.9P0.1, 68.2P1 - 195max) fps ∼97% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
103 (33.5min, 51.4P0.1, 68P1 - 190max) fps ∼94%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
101 fps ∼93% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
92.5 fps ∼85% -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (73.5 - 109, n=30)
91.8 fps ∼84% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.3 - 123, n=195, last 2 years)
76.9 fps ∼71% -25%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
130 (114.3min) fps ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
128 (112.9min) fps ∼98% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (103 - 140, n=29)
118 fps ∼91% +3%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
117 (101.8min) fps ∼90% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
117 (102min) fps ∼90% +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.6 - 156, n=152, last 2 years)
116 fps ∼89% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
115 (99.6min) fps ∼88%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
82.9 fps ∼100% +19%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
80.2 fps ∼97% +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62.7 - 98.4, n=31)
76.8 fps ∼93% +10%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
75.8 fps ∼91% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.6 - 113, n=153, last 2 years)
75.3 fps ∼91% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
71.8 fps ∼87% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
69.9 fps ∼84%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP 140W)
174 (82.8min, 129P1 - 345max) fps ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
168 (84.4min, 126P1 - 285max) fps ∼97%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
163 (119min, 123P1 - 273max) fps ∼94% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (105 - 194, n=21)
158 fps ∼91% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 219, n=69, last 2 years)
152 fps ∼87% -10%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, TGP 140W)
131 (81.3min, 104P1 - 238max) fps ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
126 (68.1min, 98.7P1 - 269max) fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (48.7 - 165, n=23, last 2 years)
125 fps ∼95% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (82.3 - 132, n=8)
116 fps ∼89% -8%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 High Quality
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP 140W)
95 fps ∼100% +4%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (1.3)
93.8 fps ∼99% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
91.6 fps ∼96%
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90.2 fps ∼95% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=24)
85.9 fps ∼90% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (15.4 - 115, n=86, last 2 years)
81.8 fps ∼86% -11%
2560x1440 High Quality
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3, Overboost, TGP 140W)
74.2 fps ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
71.5 fps ∼96%
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 90.3, n=28, last 2 years)
68 fps ∼92% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (49.1 - 78.2, n=13)
65.6 fps ∼88% -8%
GTA V
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
97 (8.76min, 66.7P1 - 172max) fps ∼100% +10%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
95.7 (17.9min, 66.7P1 - 174max) fps ∼99% +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
90.4 (15.6min, 62.5P1 - 172max) fps ∼93% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
88.5 (16.4min, 58.8P1 - 182max) fps ∼91%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (72.6 - 108, n=23)
87.8 fps ∼91% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.18 - 112, n=90, last 2 years)
83.2 fps ∼86% -6%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
83.4 (21.4min, 55.6P1 - 158max) fps ∼100%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
83 (20.4min, 58.8P1 - 167max) fps ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (48 - 99.1, n=20, last 2 years)
82.3 fps ∼99% -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (70.8 - 83.7, n=8)
77.7 fps ∼93% -7%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
MSI GP76 Leopard 10UG
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
114 fps ∼100% +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
110 (86min - 136max) fps ∼96% +5%
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108 (79min - 136max) fps ∼95% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
105 (80min - 131max) fps ∼92%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (89 - 122, n=21)
103 fps ∼90% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 146, n=88, last 2 years)
97.1 fps ∼85% -8%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (Overboost, TGP 140W)
97 (79min - 112max) fps ∼100% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (48 - 112, n=27, last 2 years)
91.3 fps ∼94% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90 (77min - 103max) fps ∼93%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (81 - 99, n=10)
89.3 fps ∼92% -1%
Dirt 5
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Aorus 17G YD
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
87.5 (58.8min, 65.7P0.1, 71.2P1 - 139.1max) fps ∼100% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (86.1)
86.1 (53min, 60.3P0.1, 68.3P1 - 129.4max) fps ∼98% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
82.6 (49.2min, 56.2P0.1, 64.9P1 - 127.7max) fps ∼94%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (50 - 86.1, n=9)
74.6 fps ∼85% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 110, n=33, last 2 years)
67.8 fps ∼77% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X10 MD61804
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q