Notebookcheck Logo

Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti

Re-polished.

The current incarnation of the Blade 15 still continues to rely on potent Alder Lake and Ampere hardware but also offers an enticing upgrade: Razer has gone for a high-contrast OLED display (QHD) complete with a high refresh rate (240 Hz) and excellent color space coverage.

The Razer Blade 15 (Early 2022) has ambitions to be a laptop for both gamers and creative users. Suitable hardware is on board: Core i9-12900H CPU, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptop GPU and a colour-accurate OLED display (QHD). Similar compact competitors can be found in the form of the Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), the Aorus 15 XE5, the HP Omen 16, and the Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.

Information regarding the case, features, input devices and speakers are already at hand in our review of its sibling, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). The latter is equipped with an LED panel (QHD) - the most relevant difference to the current device. 

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (Blade 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900H 14 x 1.8 - 5 GHz, 160 W PL2 / Short Burst, 65 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1035 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 110 W TDP, GDDR6, 31.0.15.2849, Optimus
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both are used)
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, glossy: yes, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
, 2 M.2-2280 slots (PCIe 4), 893 GB free
Connections
5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headset combined port, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 16.99 x 355 x 235 ( = 0.67 x 13.98 x 9.25 in)
Battery
80 Wh, 5209 mAh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: FHD
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Microsoft 365 (Trial), Microsoft OneNote (Trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.01 kg ( = 70.9 oz / 4.43 pounds), Power Supply: 790 g ( = 27.87 oz / 1.74 pounds)
Price
3249 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
89.9 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.8 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2023
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg19.9 mm16.00"2560x1600
85.5 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg24 mm15.60"2560x1440
87.4 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
1.9 kg21.65 mm15.60"2560x1440
85.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Size comparison

369 mm / 14.5 in 248 mm / 9.76 in 23 mm / 0.906 in 2.3 kg5.05 lbs360 mm / 14.2 in 244 mm / 9.61 in 24 mm / 0.945 in 2.3 kg5.1 lbs356.4 mm / 14 in 233.8 mm / 9.2 in 21.65 mm / 0.852 in 1.9 kg4.28 lbs355 mm / 14 in 243 mm / 9.57 in 19.9 mm / 0.783 in 2.1 kg4.57 lbs355 mm / 14 in 235 mm / 9.25 in 16.99 mm / 0.669 in 2 kg4.43 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs
Right side: Memory card reader (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot for a cable lock
Right side: Memory card reader (SD), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI, slot for a cable lock
Left side: Power connector, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), combined audio jack
Left side: Power connector, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C; Power Delivery, Displayport), combined audio jack
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s +105%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
138.1 (127.28min - 140.64max) MB/s +71%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 204, n=74, last 2 years)
101.5 MB/s +26%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
80.8 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
77 MB/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
60 MB/s -26%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
261.31 MB/s +211%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s +116%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 261, n=73, last 2 years)
130.3 MB/s +55%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
84.1 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (n=1)
1160 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (n=1)
1470 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1692 (1588min - 1709max) MBit/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1664 (1336min - 1741max) MBit/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1655 (1550min - 1681max) MBit/s -2%
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (1465 - 1762, n=5)
1628 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (853 - 1788, n=52, last 2 years)
1473 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1619 (1564min - 1655max) MBit/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1612 (817min - 1646max) MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1477 (1339min - 1623max) MBit/s
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
  (917 - 1727, n=9)
1418 MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1741, n=120, last 2 years)
1410 MBit/s -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MediaTek MT7921
967 (489min - 981max) MBit/s -35%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1635 (842-1702)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1559-1632)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1692 (1588-1709)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1655 (1550-1681)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1664 (1336-1741)
ColorChecker
6.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022): 9.02 ∆E min: 4.05 - max: 13.82 ∆E

Display - The mobile Razer computer brings along an OLED panel

Pixelraster
Pixel raster

The OLED display offers the same key data as its LED display sibling: A resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels (QHD) at a refresh rate of 240 Hz and 15.6 inches in diameter.

Typical for OLEDs, the panel scores points for wonderful black levels and fast response times. In addition, this is accompanied by relatively high maximum brightness. This is something its LED counterpart cannot hold a flame to. 

The OLED panel's weaknesses: It has a glossy surface and flickers at a brightness setting of ≤ 70 percent at a frequency of 500 Hz. The technically induced flickering is connected to the panel's brightness regulation. In this regard, its sibling's matte, flicker-free LED panel has its nose in front. 

385
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
382
cd/m²
384
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Samsung ATNA562P02-0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 387 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 383.9 cd/m² Minimum: 4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 381 cd/m²
Contrast: 12767:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Aorus 15 XE5
Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Display
-6%
-4%
-20%
-17%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
97.6
92.8
-5%
95.2
-2%
67.3
-31%
71
-27%
99.1
2%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.5
-1%
99.9
1%
96.7
-3%
97.9
-2%
99.9
1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
94
83.1
-12%
84.5
-10%
68.2
-27%
73.3
-22%
86.8
-8%
Response Times
-340%
-475%
-365%
-498%
-550%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
2 ?(1, 1)
7.6 ?(3.4, 4.2)
-280%
14.4 ?(6.9, 7.5)
-620%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-625%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-620%
Response Time Black / White *
2 ?(1, 1)
10 ?(4.6, 5.4)
-400%
8.6 ?(5.1, 3.5)
-330%
7 ?(3.3, 3.7)
-250%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
-370%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-480%
PWM Frequency
500 ?(70)
Screen
-96%
-169%
-178%
-184%
-106%
Brightness middle
383
497
30%
336
-12%
326
-15%
335
-13%
286
-25%
Brightness
384
481
25%
316
-18%
303
-21%
319
-17%
271
-29%
Brightness Distribution
99
82
-17%
89
-10%
89
-10%
90
-9%
89
-10%
Black Level *
0.03
0.21
-600%
0.34
-1033%
0.33
-1000%
0.28
-833%
0.25
-733%
Contrast
12767
2367
-81%
988
-92%
988
-92%
1196
-91%
1144
-91%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.89
3.53
-87%
3.36
-78%
2.73
-44%
4.38
-132%
2.74
-45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.76
6.15
-64%
6.67
-77%
9.54
-154%
9.48
-152%
5.21
-39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
2.67
3.53
-32%
0.74
72%
1.36
49%
1.33
50%
2.52
6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.26
1.74
-38%
4.7
-273%
5.2
-313%
7
-456%
1.1
13%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.244 98%
2.074 106%
2.103 105%
2.2 100%
CCT
6386 102%
6418 101%
6897 94%
6911 94%
6244 104%
6408 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-147% / -112%
-216% / -177%
-188% / -171%
-233% / -193%
-219% / -147%

* ... smaller is better

Even out-of-the-box, the display delivers impressive color reproduction: With a deviation of 1,9, the target (DeltaE < 3) is clearly met. Calibration doesn't lead to any improvements. Color accuracy is given: The sRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces are reproduced completely and almost completely with the AdobeRGB color space at 94 percent. The sibling's LED panel also delivers similarly good results.

CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Gray scales
CalMAN - Gray scales
CalMAN - Color saturation
CalMAN - Color saturation
Blade vs. AdobeRGB
Blade vs. AdobeRGB
Blade vs. DCI P3
Blade vs. DCI P3
Blade vs. sRGB
Blade vs. sRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.6 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1 ms rise
↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 500 Hz ≤ 70 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8370 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The panel comes with great viewing angle stability and is legible from every angle. However, outdoors this is difficult due to the display's glossy, reflective surface.

The Blade outdoors
The Blade outdoors
Viewing angle
Viewing angle

Performance - Blade 15 is based on Alder Lake and Ampere

With the Blade 15 (early 2022), Razer has a laptop in its product range designed for QHD gaming (high to maximum settings) but it also cuts a fine figure in areas such as video editing and rendering. The model reviewed here can be had for around $1,967.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
Systeminfo

Test conditions

It is possible to switch between the three performance modes ("Balanced", "Silent", and "User-defined") by using the "Fn" + "P" key combo. The "User-defined" profile allows subpresets settings for the CPU ("Low", "Medium", "High", "Boost") and GPU ("Low", "Medium", and "High") - via preinstalled Razer Synapse software. In battery mode, only the "Balanced" profile is available. 

The benchmarks were carried out using the active "User-defined" mode at maximum settings (subpresets "Boost" and "High"). For the battery test, the "Silent" profile was used.

Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse
Razer Synapse

Processor

The Core i9-12900H processor (Alder Lake) consists of six performance cores (hyperthreading, 2.5 to 5 GHz) and eight efficiency cores (no hyperthreading, 1.8 to 3.8 GHz). In total, there are 20 logical CPU cores.

The Cinebench R15 benchmark multi-thread test was processed at 3.6 to 3.8 GHz (P-cores) and 2.8 to 2.9 GHz (E-cores). We ran the single-thread test at 1.4 to 4.5 GHz (P-cores) and 1.5 to 3.5 GHz (E-cores), respectively. In battery mode, the clock speeds are lower. The CB15 loop test shows: Multi-thread load is only confronted with high turbo clock speed for a short time. After 30 to 40 seconds the values drop to roughly the base clock speed.

Multi-thread (wall power)
Multi-thread (wall power)
Single-thread (wall power)
Single-thread (wall power)

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2191 (2149.96-2543.07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2532 (2431.02-2585.82)
Aorus 15 XE5 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1985 (1932.74-2711.24)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1427 (1394.46-1547.03)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2557 (2455.34-2812.94)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
CPU clock speeds while running CB15 loop (Max)
CPU clock speeds while running CB15 loop (Max)
CPU clock speeds while running CB15 loop (Balanced)
CPU clock speeds while running CB15 loop (Balanced)
CPU clock speeds while running CB15 loop (Silent)
CPU clock speeds while running CB15 loop (Silent)
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
84.1 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
71.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
70.7 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
67.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
66.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
64.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
64 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
50.1 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 40970, n=143, last 2 years)
23391 Points +50%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16170 Points +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
15870 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
15600 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (7359 - 19648, n=28)
15133 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
10742 Points -31%
Single Core
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2267, n=143, last 2 years)
1937 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1871 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1634 - 1930, n=28)
1829 Points +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1759 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1721 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1515 Points -12%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=143, last 2 years)
9010 Points +50%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6053 Points +1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
6044 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
6007 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2681 - 7471, n=28)
5717 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4148 Points -31%
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=143, last 2 years)
746 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
715 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (624 - 738, n=28)
706 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
683 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
662 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points -12%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=145, last 2 years)
3616 Points +42%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
2586 (2431.02min - 2585.82max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
2543 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1395 - 3077, n=28)
2454 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1547 Points -39%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=143, last 2 years)
286 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
263 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (235 - 277, n=29)
262 Points +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
249 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points -8%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
309 Seconds * -40%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
236 Seconds * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (160 - 451, n=28)
231 Seconds * -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * -3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
195 Seconds * +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=138, last 2 years)
162.9 Seconds * +26%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 148086, n=141, last 2 years)
87805 MIPS +38%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
66057 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
63825 MIPS
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34684 - 76677, n=28)
60849 MIPS -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
58296 MIPS -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47298 MIPS -26%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=141, last 2 years)
6365 MIPS +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
6192 MIPS +15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5302 - 6289, n=28)
5843 MIPS +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
5739 MIPS +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS +7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5492 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
5367 MIPS
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=140, last 2 years)
15829 Points +30%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points +11%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
12832 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
12753 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
12215 Points
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8519 - 14376, n=31)
11913 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
8261 Points -32%
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=140, last 2 years)
1960 Points +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
1841 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1631 - 1897, n=31)
1800 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
1728 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
1661 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1579 Points -5%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=141, last 2 years)
25.3 fps +46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
18.9 fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
17.3 fps
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps -1%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (8.05 - 22.5, n=28)
17.1 fps -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.2 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12.8 fps -26%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * -2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
50.7 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=139, last 2 years)
47.8 s * +6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
47.5 s * +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36.8 - 59.8, n=28)
42.4 s * +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
42.2 s * +17%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * +19%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
37.5 s * +26%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.557 sec * -11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.503 sec *
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4647 sec * +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (0.4218 - 0.506, n=28)
0.454 sec * +10%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.4352 sec * +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=142, last 2 years)
0.4319 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2543 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
213 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
662 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6007 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1721 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
15600 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
72.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
63.5 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
 
60.2 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
52.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (7192 - 85542, n=140, last 2 years)
25828 KRay/s +91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15387 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
13493 KRay/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12736 KRay/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
12680 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (4074 - 18289, n=28)
11191 KRay/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s -43%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (35040 - 252486, n=140, last 2 years)
118938 Points +66%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
74919 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
71736 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63698 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
61649 Points -14%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (22307 - 93236, n=28)
55458 Points -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points -49%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points -50%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1728 - 10389, n=140, last 2 years)
5418 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
4107 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3545 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3400 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (1378 - 4215, n=28)
3048 MB/s -10%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3023 MB/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s -21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=140, last 2 years)
117555 Points +11%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
106137 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105420 Points -1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102811 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (78172 - 111241, n=28)
100462 Points -5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points -12%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86848 Points -18%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (5020 - 33636, n=140, last 2 years)
14015 Points +44%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9706 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9538 Points -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (5709 - 10410, n=28)
9016 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
8872 Points -9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8654 Points -11%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Gaming
  (17585 - 134044, n=140, last 2 years)
60946 Points +79%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
37197 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36496 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34034 Points
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31084 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (11257 - 45581, n=28)
28667 Points -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points -37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points -38%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
135380 MB/s +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
128492 MB/s +30%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113172 MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=140, last 2 years)
109622 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99217 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (31935 - 151546, n=28)
85711 MB/s -14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2531, n=140, last 2 years)
1449 MB/s +36%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1064 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
993 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s -11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (449 - 1193, n=28)
932 MB/s -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s -13%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
860 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
690 MB/s -35%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3856 - 45446, n=140, last 2 years)
13863 KRay/s +91%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8316 KRay/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7268 KRay/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
6946 KRay/s -4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6843 KRay/s -6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (2235 - 10511, n=28)
6205 KRay/s -15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s -39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s -43%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
42574 MPixel/s +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 62274, n=140, last 2 years)
41481 MPixel/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s +19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s +18%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (20960 - 48269, n=29)
36660 MPixel/s +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
35065 MPixel/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34573 MPixel/s
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34312 MPixel/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
26692 MPixel/s -23%

System Performance

The system runs smoothly and reliably and provides enough power for demanding application areas such as rendering, video editing and gaming. The RAM's transfer rates are at a normal level for DDR5-4800 memory and this is complemented by good PC-Mark results.

The RAM runs in dual-channel mode.
The RAM runs in dual-channel mode.
PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=127, last 2 years)
8009 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
7871 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (7087 - 8072, n=6)
7712 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7695 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7336 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6126 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10936 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10266 - 11663, n=6)
10807 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=127, last 2 years)
10791 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10764 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10328 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9544 Points -8%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10352 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
10187 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9402 - 10742, n=6)
10153 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10024 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=127, last 2 years)
9885 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8571 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=127, last 2 years)
13239 Points +28%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
11881 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10009 - 12541, n=6)
11364 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11099 Points +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10350 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7627 Points -26%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=108, last 2 years)
1950 Points +13%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1947 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1884 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1664 - 2044, n=6)
1871 Points +8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1730 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1656 Points -4%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1887 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=108, last 2 years)
1839 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1797 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1591 - 1968, n=6)
1784 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1641 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1640 Points 0%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2729, n=108, last 2 years)
2163 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2004 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1797 - 2148, n=6)
2004 Points +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1983 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1883 Points
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1692 Points -10%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2022 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
1803 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1514 - 2069, n=6)
1759 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=108, last 2 years)
1717 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1600 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1573 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
5101 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
5789 points
PCMark 10 Score
7336 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21750 - 97515, n=140, last 2 years)
68734 MB/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63157 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s +13%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s +12%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (34438 - 74264, n=28)
58945 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
55639 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
50524 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48120 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (22956 - 103347, n=140, last 2 years)
71769 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67051 MB/s +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s +7%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (36365 - 74642, n=28)
61718 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
61461 MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57551 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
48849 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22297 - 108954, n=140, last 2 years)
70489 MB/s +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66275 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (32276 - 67858, n=28)
59318 MB/s +2%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58294 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58073 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
46056 MB/s -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=140, last 2 years)
98.8 ns * +1%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 ns * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
94 ns * +5%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
88 ns * +11%
Average Intel Core i9-12900H
  (74.7 - 118.1, n=27)
85.7 ns * +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

The standardized latency monitor test (internet surfing, 4k video playback, Prime95 high load) revealed anomalies. The system doesn't appear to be suitable for video and audio editing in real time. However, future software updates could lead to either improvements or deteriorations in performance.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3261 μs * -249%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * -46%
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1109.7 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
945.7 μs * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
933.2 μs *
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * +23%

* ... smaller is better

Mass storage

The Blade has space for two PCIe-4 SSDs in the M.2 2280 format. The installed PCIe-4 SSD (1 TB) from Samsung delivers very good transfer rates. Drops in performance due to thermal throttling were not present. 

The Blade has space for two SSDs.
The Blade has space for two SSDs.
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7098 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2442 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 643.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 454.2 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 3732 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 2413 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 80.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 213.2 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
91.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
83.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
78.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
75.7 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
 
72.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
70.9 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
70.8 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4199 (4194.93min - 4199.13max) MB/s +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4117 (3552.16min - 4116.81max) MB/s +16%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3928 (3889.8min - 3927.66max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1761 - 4677, n=87)
3765 MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3764 (3540.2min - 3763.76max) MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3564 (3515.46min - 3563.69max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 7663, n=123, last 2 years)
3429 MB/s -4%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4767 (4365.51min - 4766.62max) MB/s +35%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4299 (4288.86min - 4298.95max) MB/s +22%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4236 (3477.46min - 4236.46max) MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
4033 (3953.13min - 4032.82max) MB/s +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 9307, n=123, last 2 years)
3875 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2220 - 4564, n=87)
3583 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3531 (3391.93min - 3530.77max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7020 (5888.98min - 7020.02max) MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s +4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
6867 (6210.3min - 6866.91max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6847 (6590.72min - 6846.78max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6663 (6017.91min - 6663.07max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 15056, n=123, last 2 years)
6585 MB/s -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6550 (5497.59min - 6549.73max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (3421 - 7100, n=87)
6480 MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5412 (5265.32min - 5411.99max) MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (1281 - 13519, n=123, last 2 years)
5147 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4999 (4982.73min - 4998.98max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4980 (4904.66min - 4979.58max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4876 (4374.87min - 4876.3max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2216 - 5281, n=87)
4818 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
4421 (4173.33min - 4420.8max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.2 (79.58min - 81.23max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
80.6 (67.84min - 80.61max) MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.9 (77.66min - 77.9max) MB/s -4%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
77.1 (76.91min - 77.11max) MB/s -5%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (48.4 - 97.4, n=87)
76.7 MB/s -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
74.3 (71.59min - 74.33max) MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 95.9, n=123, last 2 years)
67.2 MB/s -17%
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
333 (331.94min - 333.25max) MB/s +57%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
264 (263.57min - 264.44max) MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s +21%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
239 (238.19min - 238.82max) MB/s +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=123, last 2 years)
216 MB/s +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
212 (209.62min - 211.78max) MB/s
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
205 (195.73min - 204.56max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (49.9 - 280, n=87)
188.4 MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4309 (4179.96min - 4309.38max) MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4152 (4133.05min - 4152.1max) MB/s
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3566 (3562.85min - 3566.11max) MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2855 (2482.75min - 2854.87max) MB/s -31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (376 - 4185, n=87)
2579 MB/s -38%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=123, last 2 years)
2480 MB/s -40%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1528 (1477.56min - 1527.59max) MB/s -63%
4k q32 t16 write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3600 (3594.9min - 3599.81max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3512 (3421.77min - 3511.78max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3435 (2876.62min - 3435.27max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2694 (2561.51min - 2693.92max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 5588, n=123, last 2 years)
2023 MB/s -42%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (291 - 3559, n=87)
1953 MB/s -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
585 (555.77min - 584.61max) MB/s -83%
AS SSD
Score Total
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9117 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8376 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points +7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7180 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2577 - 9147, n=86)
6872 Points -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
6864 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2319 - 13854, n=123, last 2 years)
6736 Points -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5985 Points -17%
Score Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3576 Points +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3123 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2858 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2562 Points -10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (983 - 3469, n=86)
2425 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=123, last 2 years)
2354 Points -18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1994 Points -30%
Score Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3814 Points +31%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3723 Points +28%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (921 - 4043, n=86)
3277 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (989 - 7208, n=123, last 2 years)
3246 Points +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
3093 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2953 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2916 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points -12%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s +24%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
5592.23 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
5396.69 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5171.96 MB/s +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 9890, n=123, last 2 years)
5102 MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (2638 - 5621, n=86)
4896 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4623.95 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
3388 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
4240 MB/s +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s +15%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3881.37 MB/s +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (722 - 9486, n=123, last 2 years)
3857 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3551.32 MB/s
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (1617 - 4526, n=86)
3328 MB/s -6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3311.86 MB/s -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2667.04 MB/s -25%
4K Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
106.98 MB/s +77%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
73.81 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (45.9 - 89.2, n=86)
72.4 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
66.29 MB/s +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=123, last 2 years)
66.2 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
60.3 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
52.1 MB/s -14%
4K Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
289.15 MB/s +57%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
247.26 MB/s +34%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.4 - 512, n=123, last 2 years)
216 MB/s +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
205 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
189.98 MB/s +3%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (118.6 - 246, n=86)
186 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
183.9 MB/s
4K-64 Read
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2909.44 MB/s +25%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2789 MB/s +19%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2539.3 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2335.71 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2171 MB/s -7%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (421 - 2854, n=86)
1863 MB/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3630, n=123, last 2 years)
1771 MB/s -24%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
1380.56 MB/s -41%
4K-64 Write
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
3193.44 MB/s +34%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3144.88 MB/s +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (367 - 3451, n=86)
2758 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (521 - 5909, n=123, last 2 years)
2648 MB/s +11%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
2579.14 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2376.83 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
2324 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1934 MB/s -19%
Access Time Read
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.083 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.07 ms * +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=123, last 2 years)
0.05706 ms * +31%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.056 ms * +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.052 ms * +37%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.045 ms * +46%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.018 - 0.083, n=85)
0.03785 ms * +54%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.023 ms * +72%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.058 ms * -164%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=123, last 2 years)
0.04785 ms * -118%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
  (0.017 - 0.101, n=86)
0.03444 ms * -57%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.022 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
0.02 ms * +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
0.016 ms * +27%
Aorus 15 XE5
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
0.013 ms * +41%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035571010651420177521302485284031953550390542604615497053255680603563906745Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6602 (5678.43-6643.28)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH: Ø4741 (3891.45-4949.7)
Aorus 15 XE5 Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10: Ø7001 (6418.71-7045.97)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW: Ø6780 (6489.82-6797.74)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng WDC PC SN810 1TB: Ø6496 (1637.54-6888.72)
Razer Blade 15 2022 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6887 (6595.77-6910.33)

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptop GPU (VRAM: 8192 MB GDDR6) delivers 3D-Mark results at the GPU's average level determined up to now and the relatively low maximum TGP of 110 watts is noticeable. The direct image output via the GeForce GPU leads to a negligible increase in graphics performance. Switching between Optimus and dGPU mode is done directly in the BIOS or via Razer Synapse software. Advanced Optimus is not supported.

Fire Strike (wall power, Max)
Fire Strike (wall power, Max)
Fire Strike (wall power, dGPU, Max)
Fire Strike (wall power, dGPU, Max)
Fire Strike (wall power, Balanced)
Fire Strike (wall power, Balanced)
Fire Strike (battery mode, Balanced)
Fire Strike (battery mode, Balanced)
Fire Strike (wall power, Silent)
Fire Strike (wall power, Silent)
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
99.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
85.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
82.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
81.1 pt
Aorus 15 XE5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
79.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
79.5 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
78.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
75.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
74 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 76300, n=135, last 2 years)
46560 Points +29%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
37438 Points +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
37151 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
36023 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13799 - 42569, n=36)
35944 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
35719 Points -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
34141 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
32236 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
32235 Points -11%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
153993 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
153719 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (84648 - 193851, n=60, last 2 years)
148787 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
145558 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
144658 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
141689 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137434 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33126 - 181005, n=25)
130456 Points -10%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 62849, n=148, last 2 years)
33580 Points +24%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
28601 Points +5%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
28374 Points +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22612 - 32550, n=37)
27554 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
27309 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
27183 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
25891 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
24766 Points -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
24618 Points -9%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25040, n=144, last 2 years)
14165 Points +39%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
11071 Points +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
10623 Points +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8142 - 12324, n=37)
10478 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
10357 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
10157 Points
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
9980 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
9421 Points -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
9048 Points -11%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
48871 points
3DMark 11 Performance
30645 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
59982 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23793 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
10342 points
Help
Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
28 Seconds * -8%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
26 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)
26 Seconds * -0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (22 - 30, n=15)
25.3 Seconds * +3%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)
24 Seconds * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (9 - 95, n=135, last 2 years)
20.1 Seconds * +23%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
45 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
45 Seconds *
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)
44 Seconds * +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 46, n=16)
41.4 Seconds * +8%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)
40 Seconds * +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (15 - 110, n=135, last 2 years)
33.7 Seconds * +25%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
559 Seconds * -49%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (3.3.0)
404 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3, dGPU)
378 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
376 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (285 - 459, n=16)
376 Seconds * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (3.3.3)
329 Seconds * +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (122 - 962, n=141, last 2 years)
278 Seconds * +26%
GPUScore: Sacred Path
2560x1440 Official VRS
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)
134.8 (63.1min, 116.3P1 - 196.8max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)
17.9 (14.8min, 14.9P1 - 27.9max) fps -87%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)
134.8 (63.1min, 116.3P1 - 196.8max) fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12. dGPU)
132.1 (111.8min, 113.5P1 - 195.7max) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.89 - 313, n=185, last 2 years)
110.2 fps -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (17.9 - 134.8, n=4)
104.9 fps -22%
2560x1440 Official
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3, dGPU)
130.6 (107.4min, 111.4P1 - 183.5max) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12, dGPU)
122.4 (103.4min, 104.7P1 - 186.3max) fps -5%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 Vulkan 1.3)
129.4 (23min, 110P1 - 180.4max) fps
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (0.9.0 DirectX 12)
17 (14.2min, 14.3P1 - 25.6max) fps -87%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (1.0.0 Vulkan 1.3)
115.7 (58.1min, 92.3P1 - 149.7max) fps -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.43 - 305, n=255, last 2 years)
111.9 fps -14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (17 - 130.6, n=6)
107.2 fps -17%
Geekbench 5.5
OpenCL Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5039 - 276660, n=139, last 2 years)
139463 Points +19%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
128448 Points +10%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
123594 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (100630 - 150471, n=38)
121784 Points +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
116873 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
110844 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
109157 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
108536 Points -7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
107175 Points -8%
Vulkan Score 5.5
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
86126 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (9296 - 177533, n=106, last 2 years)
81247 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (52594 - 92020, n=10)
67737 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
64974 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
61835 Points
Geekbench 6.0
GPU Vulkan 6.0
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
96149 Points +403%
Average of class Gaming
  (4776 - 184611, n=18, last 2 years)
70003 Points +266%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19109 - 96149, n=2)
57629 Points +202%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
19109 Points
GPU OpenCL 6.0
Average of class Gaming
  (30211 - 207017, n=19, last 2 years)
116421 Points +12%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
104147 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (103225 - 104147, n=2)
103686 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (dGPU)
103225 Points -1%
V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
Average of class Gaming
  (556 - 4011, n=75, last 2 years)
2278 mpaths +54%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
1834 mpaths +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1334 - 1847, n=15)
1570 mpaths +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)
1480 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)
1471 mpaths -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
1455 mpaths -2%
GPU CUDA
Average of class Gaming
  (425 - 3264, n=76, last 2 years)
1657 mpaths +36%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
1378 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1062 - 1391, n=14)
1261 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)
1214 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)
1210 mpaths 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
1194 mpaths -2%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (4081 - 30302, n=79, last 2 years)
15746 mpaths +52%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1, dGPU)
10826 mpaths +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (5.0.1)
10360 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H (5.0.1)
10193 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (2880 - 11931, n=20)
9832 mpaths -5%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (5.0.1)
9590 mpaths -7%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (5.0.1)
7572 mpaths -27%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (54 - 1333, n=117, last 2 years)
762 mpaths +71%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
558 mpaths +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (277 - 559, n=33)
465 mpaths +4%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )
456 mpaths +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
445 mpaths
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)
435 mpaths -2%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
399 mpaths -10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
398 mpaths -11%
CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (6122 - 45327, n=117, last 2 years)
23389 ksamples +50%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
18763 ksamples +20%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07, dGPU)
16498 ksamples +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
16474 ksamples +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H (v4.10.07 )
15575 ksamples
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4722 - 19786, n=33)
15523 ksamples 0%
Aorus 15 XE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H (v4.10.07 )
14684 ksamples -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H (v4.10.07 )
11804 ksamples -24%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.3 - 37.6, n=14, last 2 years)
26.9 fps +32%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
20.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19.9 - 20.4, n=2)
20.2 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
18.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 54.3, n=14, last 2 years)
38.2 fps +15%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
33.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.1 - 33.1, n=2)
32.6 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
32 fps -3%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (281 - 687, n=14, last 2 years)
449 fps +34%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
334 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
334 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
285.6 fps -14%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (28.2 - 76.5, n=14, last 2 years)
48.6 fps +106%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (23.6 - 23.8, n=2)
23.7 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
23.6 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
23.4 fps -1%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (79.3 - 141.9, n=14, last 2 years)
110.5 fps +16%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
95 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (n=1)
95 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
85.6 fps -10%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (47.9 - 117.2, n=14, last 2 years)
76.7 fps +17%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
65.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (63.6 - 65.5, n=2)
64.5 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.6 fps -9%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 221, n=14, last 2 years)
130.4 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
104.8 fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900H
98.5 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (95.6 - 98.5, n=2)
97 fps -2%

* ... smaller is better

Gaming Performance

The laptop is designed for QHD gaming at high to maximum settings. Higher resolutions would be possible by connecting to a suitable monitor - albeit at sometimes reduced settings. The frame rate of the tested titles is at a level typical for the determined RTX 3070 Ti average. The direct image output via GeForce GPU can lead - depending on the game - to a minimal increase in frame rates. 

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
97.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 pt
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
84.8 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.6 pt
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
82.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
81.1 pt
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
80.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
74.9 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 224, n=91, last 2 years)
129.1 fps +34%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107.2 (99min) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (76.8 - 124.1, n=39)
102.4 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.1 (21.9min, 25.6P0.1, 52.5P1) fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97.7 (83min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
97.7 (84min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
96.4 (82min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
91.8 (38.7min, 41.3P0.1, 60.8P1) fps -5%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 186.9, n=121, last 2 years)
119.1 fps +5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (4.44min, 76.9P1) fps +4%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115.6 (3.67min, 83.3P1) fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
113.7 (33.2min, 76.9P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (16.1min, 76.9P1) fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
110.2 (10.6min, 76.9P1) fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
108.1 (4.18min, 76.9P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44 - 123.9, n=36)
106.7 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
100 (16.4min, 66.7P1) fps -12%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 212, n=139, last 2 years)
128.1 fps +28%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
106 fps +6%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
104.6 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU)
103.8 fps +3%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
100.3 fps
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99.6 (59min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49.5 - 122.4, n=35)
98.5 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
94.8 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.3)
93.8 fps -6%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 453, n=131, last 2 years)
245 fps +41%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
188.5 (48.7min, 134P1) fps +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
184 (33.3min, 131P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (109 - 221, n=37)
179.9 fps +4%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU)
175.9 (41.6min, 131.7P1) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
173.4 (30.1min, 131.1P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
165.6 (39.1min, 131.2P1) fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
163.8 (35.9min, 125.2P1) fps -6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
146.6 (72.6min, 102.4P1) fps -15%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
160.5 (140.4min) fps +21%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156 (135.1min) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 248, n=141, last 2 years)
152.6 fps +15%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
145.2 (127.1min) fps +9%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
140.8 (121.1min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (68.7 - 160.5, n=38)
135.6 fps +2%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
134.9 (115.1min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
133 (114.4min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
125.3 (106.2min) fps -6%
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
115 fps +21%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
112.5 fps +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110 fps +16%
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
105.3 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.4 - 166.2, n=143, last 2 years)
104.8 fps +10%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (dGPU)
100.8 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.6 - 116.9, n=37)
95.5 fps +1%
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95 fps
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
86.8 fps -9%

In order to check if the frame rates continue to remain stable over longer periods of time, we ran "The Witcher 3" game for roughly 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The game character was not moved and there was no noticeable drop in frame rates. 

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

0102030405060708090100110Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.3 (87-96)
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91 (74-97)
Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø100.3 (92-105)
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU: Ø90.6 (86-94)
HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø96.2 (88-100)
Razer Blade 15 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø102.3 (87-111)
GPU analysis during the Witcher 3 test (Max)
GPU analysis during the Witcher 3 test (Max)
GPU analysis during the Witcher 3 test (Max, dGPU)
GPU analysis during the Witcher 3 test (Max, dGPU)
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 182.7 177.2 172.8 113 94.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 365.8 288.5 176.6 96.4
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 162 148.2 143.4 133
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 174.2 133.3 100.3 75.1
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 133.3 121.6 95
Far Cry 5 (2018) 170 141 135 126 100
Strange Brigade (2018) 351 240 197.2 173.4 130.9
Flight Simulator 2020 (2020) 124.8 97.8 70.2 52.2 41.3
F1 22 (2022) 203 202 173.1 65.2 42.3
FIFA 23 (2022) 104.3
A Plague Tale Requiem (2022) 101.6 84 73.3 62.9 50.5
Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection (2022) 78 75.2 71.8 69.3 56.2
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 2022 (2022) 126 112 89 85 63
Spider-Man Miles Morales (2022) 107 102.6 94.9 93.2 69.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022) 117 99.3 71 70.7 52.8
Need for Speed Unbound (2022) 112.8 106.9 93 84.6 66.7
High On Life (2023) 175.7 139.4 117.5 97.1 60.8
The Witcher 3 v4.00 (2023) 174.4 149.6 81.3 71.4 47.4
Dead Space Remake (2023) 82.1 74.6 68.1 66.8 47.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 88.5 79 69.7 59.3 42.6

Emissions - The Razer laptop does not heat up excessively

Noise emissions

All in all, for a gaming laptop, noise levels are moderate. In idle and everyday use (office and internet), the fans run at low speed and are practically inaudible. Under full load (stress test, Witcher 3 test) sound pressure levels can rise to 43.9 dB (A). The "Silent" performance profile doesn't do as the name would suggest but it does manage to lower the background noise - at the expense of computational power. 

Noise Level

Idle
28 / 28 / 28 dB(A)
Load
38.5 / 43.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.233.328.129.529.22534.237.53336.334.23137.139.734.136.737.14034.634.540.530.634.65033.432.329.630.233.46325.3272426.325.38020.3202119.220.310022.122.722.22022.112521.72322.121.521.716018.221.6241918.220016.8222418.716.825016.121.524.517.816.131515.823.927.218.415.840015.323.52816.815.350014.823.827.316.414.863013.321.426.514.413.380013.126.331.116.713.1100013.52731.717.313.5125013.427.432.117.913.4160013.730.535.217.313.7200013.730.335.516.813.7250013.52934.415.313.5315013.627.534.51413.6400013.921.530.713.813.9500013.819.62714.113.8630013.917.92314.113.980001415.819.814.2141000013.914.516.114.113.91250013.714.2151413.716000131514.11413SPL2638.543.927.926N0.82.64.110.8median 13.9median 22.7median 27median 16.7median 13.9Delta1.44.35.11.91.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseRazer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH
Aorus 15 XE5
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Noise
-10%
-6%
-5%
-16%
-4%
off / environment *
26
23
12%
24
8%
26
-0%
26
-0%
25.4
2%
Idle Minimum *
28
23
18%
26
7%
26
7%
30
-7%
26.2
6%
Idle Average *
28
24
14%
28
-0%
28
-0%
31
-11%
26.2
6%
Idle Maximum *
28
47
-68%
30
-7%
31
-11%
33
-18%
28.4
-1%
Load Average *
38.5
47.91
-24%
48
-25%
45
-17%
49
-27%
44.7
-16%
Load Maximum *
43.9
50.25
-14%
52
-18%
48
-9%
57
-30%
51.9
-18%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.91
52
46
53
44.7

* ... smaller is better

Temperature

In everyday use (office, internet) the case's temperatures remain very much in the green zone. Under load (stress test, Witcher 3 test) the laptop heats up noticeably, but not excessively. 

Max. Load
 42.9 °C
109 F
49.5 °C
121 F
40.9 °C
106 F
 
 32.2 °C
90 F
45.5 °C
114 F
30.9 °C
88 F
 
 36.5 °C
98 F
34.4 °C
94 F
32.9 °C
91 F
 
Maximum: 49.5 °C = 121 F
Average: 38.4 °C = 101 F
44.3 °C
112 F
47.5 °C
118 F
41 °C
106 F
34.7 °C
94 F
45.7 °C
114 F
38.1 °C
101 F
37.4 °C
99 F
41.2 °C
106 F
36.1 °C
97 F
Maximum: 47.5 °C = 118 F
Average: 40.7 °C = 105 F
Power Supply (max.)  55.8 °C = 132 F | Room Temperature 24.2 °C = 76 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.5 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.5 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38 °C / 100.4 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-9.1 °C / -16.4 F).
Heat distribution top (load)
Heat distribution top (load)
Heat distribution top (idle)
Heat distribution top (idle)
Heat distribution top (Witcher 3)
Heat distribution top (Witcher 3)
Heat distribution bottom (load)
Heat distribution bottom (load)
Heat distribution bottom (idle)
Heat distribution bottom (idle)
Heat distribution bottom (Witcher 3)
Heat distribution bottom (Witcher 3)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Aorus 15 XE5
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
2%
-12%
-15%
9%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
49.5
52
-5%
46
7%
52
-5%
41
17%
50
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
47.5
51
-7%
57
-20%
63
-33%
62
-31%
47
1%
Idle Upper Side *
33.4
29
13%
38
-14%
37
-11%
25
25%
37.4
-12%
Idle Bottom *
35
33
6%
42
-20%
38
-9%
26
26%
38.4
-10%

* ... smaller is better

Stress test

The Blade during the stress test.
The Blade during the stress test.

The stress test (Prime95 and Furmark in continuous operation) presents the extreme scenario of analysing system stability under full load. In the course of the test, the CPU clock speed dropped from a starting point of 2.5 GHz (P-cores) and 2.1 GHz (E-cores), respectively, to around 1.7 GHz (P-cores) and 1.5 GHz (E-cores), respectively. The GPU clock speed fluctuates between 700 and 1,300 MHz.

Speakers

The stereo speakers produce a decent sound but one which lacks bass. 

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs202929.229253234.2323132.837.132.84033.934.633.9503333.4336325.325.325.38023.520.323.510034.122.134.112544.521.744.51605318.25320050.716.850.725055.416.155.431565.515.865.540074.515.374.550077.214.877.26307713.37780080.413.180.4100080.513.580.5125077.113.477.1160078.513.778.5200079.313.779.3250075.313.575.3315073.213.673.2400070.813.970.8500074.113.874.1630076.413.976.4800076.71476.71000080.113.980.11250074.913.774.91600069.31369.3SPL89.22689.2N83.80.883.8median 75.3median 13.9median 75.3Delta6.21.46.231.333.531.338.832.738.84537.7453123.63126.824.426.830.618.130.635.416.135.437.319.337.348.716.148.759.715.659.764.518.764.565.820.665.864.813.764.862.88.662.866.78.466.775.47.975.474.88.174.870.8870.869.18.569.1749.37473.79.773.769.710.869.765.610.965.665.311.365.368.411.668.470.611.770.670.111.970.168.51268.569.512.169.565.41165.48323.18358.70.558.7median 68.4median 11.3median 68.43.13.43.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRazer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.96 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy management - The Blade is very hungry in idle use

Power consumption

In idle use, energy requirements (up to 39 watts) are comparatively high. This seems to be a general problem found in the 2022 Blade models that we came across on many occasions. Under load, consumption is normal for this kind of hardware. While the Witcher 3 test ran at constant power consumption, the requirements dropped abruptly during the stress test - the CPU was stifled. The power supply unit (230 watts) is suitably sized.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.65 / 5.7 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 31.6 / 33.3 / 38.6 Watt
Load midlight 149 / 160 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, WDC PC SN810 1TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1"
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
26%
-18%
24%
29%
-8%
18%
19%
Idle Minimum *
31.6
10.8
66%
31
2%
12
62%
4
87%
33.2
-5%
14.2 ?(4 - 34.6, n=27)
55%
Idle Average *
33.3
17
49%
35
-5%
17
49%
10
70%
36.4
-9%
19.9 ?(8.9 - 43, n=27)
40%
Idle Maximum *
38.6
17.8
54%
46
-19%
24
38%
19
51%
37.6
3%
Load Average *
149
116
22%
120
19%
106
29%
114
23%
116.7
22%
125.8 ?(87.2 - 202, n=27)
16%
Witcher 3 ultra *
149.6
144
4%
202
-35%
159.9
-7%
183.2
-22%
172
-15%
Load Maximum *
160
220
-38%
268
-68%
208
-30%
221
-38%
228.6
-43%
248 ?(160 - 319, n=27)
-55%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø149.6 (124.3-155)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø149.2 (145.9-160.7)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø34.3 (32.4-37.2)

Power consumption with an external monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø65.5 (61.8-78.2)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø75.6 (43-78.2)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132.4-160.1)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø143.3 (134.9-149.9)
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022); Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.4 (23.4-28.2)

Battery life

In the WiFi test (opening websites using a script) and the video test (short film Big Buck Bunny (H.264 encoding, FHD) in a loop), the 15-inch device achieved battery runtimes of 4.34 hours and 5.52 hours, respectively. The laptop's energy-saving functions were deactivated during both tests and the display brightness was set to 150 cd/m². The video test was also carried out with the radio module switched off.

All in all, the Blade wasn't able to deliver impressive battery life - even for a powerful QHD laptop. Across the board, the competition offers better stamina - both in absolute terms and also in terms of calculated watt-hours.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
6h 44min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 110)
4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
5h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 05min
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022)
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Aorus 15 XE5
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 93.48 Wh
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 83 Wh
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
18%
24%
52%
21%
7%
20%
Reader / Idle
404
601
49%
931
130%
603
49%
H.264
352
436
24%
371
5%
448
27%
WiFi v1.3
274
445
62%
410
50%
446
63%
336
23%
292
7%
Load
125
86
-31%
112
-10%
109
-13%
114
-9%

Pros

+ Bright, high-contrast OLED display (QHD)
+ Good color reproduction and color space coverage
+ Slim display frame
+ Robust metal case
+ High system performance
+ Comparatively moderate heat production
+ PCIe-4 SSD
+ Space for a second PCIe-4 SSD
+ Thunderbolt 4
+ Power Delivery

Cons

- Reflective display
- Meagre battery life
- High energy requirements in idle use
- No Advanced Optimus

Verdict- A compact powerhouse

The Razer Blade 15 (early 22), provided by Razer.
The Razer Blade 15 (early 22), provided by Razer.

The Blade 15's main areas of application ought to be found in video editing, rendering and gaming. The Core-i9 12900H CPU and GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptop GPU (TGP: 110 watts) deliver the necessary power. A speedy PCIe-4 SSD (1 TB) ensures short loading times.

The Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) is a powerful tool for gamers and creative types alike.

The focus is not only on high performance: The computing cores' maximum results are average when compared to previously reviewed laptops with the 12900H or 3070 Ti. While heat production is typical for a laptop of this power, noise emissions are relatively moderate. The latter cannot be said about power consumption in idle use: The Blade 15 helps itself to a very large swig from the bottle. 

Real-life battery life of 4 to 6 hours fails to impress. In this regard, the competition has much more to offer. Nevertheless, the battery can be charged via a universal USB-C power supply (min. 65 watts, 20 V) and both USB-C ports (2x Thunderbolt) support Power Delivery (and Displayport).

Overall, the reflective OLED panel (QHD) scores somewhat better than the conventional LED panel (QHD) found in the previously reviewed Blade 2022 model. Both displays offer good color space coverage (sRGB: 100 %) and good color reproduction. The OLED model has its nose in front when it comes to black levels, brightness and response times, whereby the LED model scores points thanks to its matte surface.

A possible alternative to this device could come in the form of the Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z. Performance-wise, the processor is on par but it scores extra points due to a brighter, 16:10 format display as well as considerably longer battery life. A budget alternative could be the Aorus 15 XE5. Despite this machine being a few hundred dollars cheaper in price, it delivers a little more power and better battery life than the Blade.

Price and availability

The review specification Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 22) can be had on Amazon for $1,967.

Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) - 03/04/2023 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
73 / 80 → 91%
Weight
63 / 10-66 → 94%
Battery
63 / 95 → 66%
Display
91%
Games Performance
99%
Application Performance
93%
Temperature
83 / 95 → 87%
Noise
85 / 90 → 95%
Audio
82%
Camera
47 / 85 → 55%
Average
80%
90%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Read all 6 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti
Sascha Mölck, 2023-03- 9 (Update: 2024-08-15)