Razer Blade 15 OLED (early 2022) review: A compact gaming laptop with an RTX 3070 Ti

The Razer Blade 15 (Early 2022) has ambitions to be a laptop for both gamers and creative users. Suitable hardware is on board: Core i9-12900H CPU, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti laptop GPU and a colour-accurate OLED display (QHD). Similar compact competitors can be found in the form of the Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22), the Aorus 15 XE5, the HP Omen 16, and the Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z.
Information regarding the case, features, input devices and speakers are already at hand in our review of its sibling, (12800H, RTX 3080 Ti). The latter is equipped with an LED panel (QHD) - the most relevant difference to the current device.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % | 03/2023 | Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 16.99 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.8 % | 02/2023 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
85.5 % | 12/2022 | Aorus 15 XE5 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 24 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
87.4 % | 08/2022 | Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 21.65 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
85.5 % | 05/2022 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 16.10" | 2560x1440 |
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=83, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=72, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1700, n=72, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (1465 - 1762, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (886 - 1857, n=43, last 2 years) | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=7) | |
Average of class Gaming (685 - 1890, n=90, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |

Display - The mobile Razer computer brings along an OLED panel
The OLED display offers the same key data as its LED display sibling: A resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels (QHD) at a refresh rate of 240 Hz and 15.6 inches in diameter.
Typical for OLEDs, the panel scores points for wonderful black levels and fast response times. In addition, this is accompanied by relatively high maximum brightness. This is something its LED counterpart cannot hold a flame to.
The OLED panel's weaknesses: It has a glossy surface and flickers at a brightness setting of ≤ 70 percent at a frequency of 500 Hz. The technically induced flickering is connected to the panel's brightness regulation. In this regard, its sibling's matte, flicker-free LED panel has its nose in front.
|
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 381 cd/m²
Contrast: 12767:1 (Black: 0.03 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.89 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 2.67
ΔE Greyscale 1.26 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
94% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z BOE0A0B (BOE CQ NE160QDM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Aorus 15 XE5 Chi Mei N156KME-GNA, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | HP Omen 16-b1090ng BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10 | Razer Blade 15 2022 Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.60 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -6% | -4% | -20% | -17% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.6 | 92.8 -5% | 95.2 -2% | 67.3 -31% | 71 -27% | 99.1 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.4 | 98.5 -1% | 99.9 1% | 96.7 -3% | 97.9 -2% | 99.9 1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 94 | 83.1 -12% | 84.5 -10% | 68.2 -27% | 73.3 -22% | 86.8 -8% |
Response Times | -340% | -475% | -365% | -498% | -550% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2 ? | 7.6 ? -280% | 14.4 ? -620% | 11.6 ? -480% | 14.5 ? -625% | 14.4 ? -620% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2 ? | 10 ? -400% | 8.6 ? -330% | 7 ? -250% | 9.4 ? -370% | 11.6 ? -480% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | |||||
Screen | -96% | -169% | -178% | -184% | -106% | |
Brightness middle | 383 | 497 30% | 336 -12% | 326 -15% | 335 -13% | 286 -25% |
Brightness | 384 | 481 25% | 316 -18% | 303 -21% | 319 -17% | 271 -29% |
Brightness Distribution | 99 | 82 -17% | 89 -10% | 89 -10% | 90 -9% | 89 -10% |
Black Level * | 0.03 | 0.21 -600% | 0.34 -1033% | 0.33 -1000% | 0.28 -833% | 0.25 -733% |
Contrast | 12767 | 2367 -81% | 988 -92% | 988 -92% | 1196 -91% | 1144 -91% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.89 | 3.53 -87% | 3.36 -78% | 2.73 -44% | 4.38 -132% | 2.74 -45% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.76 | 6.15 -64% | 6.67 -77% | 9.54 -154% | 9.48 -152% | 5.21 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.67 | 3.53 -32% | 0.74 72% | 1.36 49% | 1.33 50% | 2.52 6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.26 | 1.74 -38% | 4.7 -273% | 5.2 -313% | 7 -456% | 1.1 13% |
Gamma | 2.41 91% | 2.2 100% | 2.244 98% | 2.074 106% | 2.103 105% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6386 102% | 6418 101% | 6897 94% | 6911 94% | 6244 104% | 6408 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -147% /
-112% | -216% /
-177% | -188% /
-171% | -233% /
-193% | -219% /
-147% |
* ... smaller is better
Even out-of-the-box, the display delivers impressive color reproduction: With a deviation of 1,9, the target (DeltaE < 3) is clearly met. Calibration doesn't lead to any improvements. Color accuracy is given: The sRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces are reproduced completely and almost completely with the AdobeRGB color space at 94 percent. The sibling's LED panel also delivers similarly good results.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 70 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 70 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18925 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Blade 15 is based on Alder Lake and Ampere
With the Blade 15 (early 2022), Razer has a laptop in its product range designed for QHD gaming (high to maximum settings) but it also cuts a fine figure in areas such as video editing and rendering. The model reviewed here can be had for around $1,967.
Test conditions
It is possible to switch between the three performance modes ("Balanced", "Silent", and "User-defined") by using the "Fn" + "P" key combo. The "User-defined" profile allows subpresets settings for the CPU ("Low", "Medium", "High", "Boost") and GPU ("Low", "Medium", and "High") - via preinstalled Razer Synapse software. In battery mode, only the "Balanced" profile is available.
The benchmarks were carried out using the active "User-defined" mode at maximum settings (subpresets "Boost" and "High"). For the battery test, the "Silent" profile was used.
Processor
The Core i9-12900H processor (Alder Lake) consists of six performance cores (hyperthreading, 2.5 to 5 GHz) and eight efficiency cores (no hyperthreading, 1.8 to 3.8 GHz). In total, there are 20 logical CPU cores.
The Cinebench R15 benchmark multi-thread test was processed at 3.6 to 3.8 GHz (P-cores) and 2.8 to 2.9 GHz (E-cores). We ran the single-thread test at 1.4 to 4.5 GHz (P-cores) and 1.5 to 3.5 GHz (E-cores), respectively. In battery mode, the clock speeds are lower. The CB15 loop test shows: Multi-thread load is only confronted with high turbo clock speed for a short time. After 30 to 40 seconds the values drop to roughly the base clock speed.
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=238, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7647 - 19648, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1698 - 1921, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2922 - 7471, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (653 - 738, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=243, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1561 - 3077, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (243 - 277, n=23) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=244, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 415, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (37614 - 76677, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Multi-Core | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=23) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Single-Core | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1647 - 1892, n=23) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (9.16 - 22.5, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (38 - 59.8, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=237, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.503, n=22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (2585 - 55084, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (12439 - 234848, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Average of class Gaming (629 - 9930, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78668 - 111241, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (15371 - 186519, n=214, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (2137 - 30810, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (7135 - 124377, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (18146 - 236139, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=22) | |
Average of class Gaming (150.9 - 2231, n=229, last 2 years) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average of class Gaming (1437 - 29473, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=23) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (8341 - 52949, n=215, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
System Performance
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (7087 - 8072, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10266 - 11663, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (9402 - 10742, n=6) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (10009 - 12541, n=6) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1664 - 2044, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (974 - 2295, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1591 - 1968, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (907 - 2166, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1797 - 2148, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1027 - 2514, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU (1514 - 2069, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 2275, n=117, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5101 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5789 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7336 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=22) | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (18074 - 80776, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Average of class Gaming (20318 - 89096, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 66275, n=22) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Average of class Gaming (15975 - 80441, n=214, last 2 years) | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (88 - 118.1, n=21) | |
Average of class Gaming (76.2 - 135.3, n=229, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
The standardized latency monitor test (internet surfing, 4k video playback, Prime95 high load) revealed anomalies. The system doesn't appear to be suitable for video and audio editing in real time. However, future software updates could lead to either improvements or deteriorations in performance.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Schenker XMG Fusion 15 (Mid 22) | |
Razer Blade 15 2022 | |
Aorus 15 XE5 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU603Z | |
Razer Blade 15 OLED (Early 2022) | |
HP Omen 16-b1090ng |
* ... smaller is better