Razer Blade 17 (Early 2022) review: Elegant 4k gaming laptop with a bright screen
The Razer Blade 17 is targeted towards gamers and creative professionals - particularly in our tested high-end configuration with a Core i9-12900H CPU, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, and 17.3-inch 4k display with accurate colors. The price point lies at around 4,700 Euros (~$4,900). In addition to the RTX 3080 Ti, its US sibling that we already tested had a Core i7-12800H CPU and a QHD-Panel (240 Hz). The competitors include extremely powerful laptops such as the Alienware x17 R2 P48E, the Medion Erazer Beast X30, and the MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS.
You can find information on the case, connection equipment, input devices, and speakers in our review of the identically constructed Blade 17 2022 (Core i7, QHD).
Possible Competitors in Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.9 % | 07/2022 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.2 % | 05/2022 | Alienware x17 R2 P48E i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 20.9 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
86.7 % | 05/2022 | Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.2 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.2 % | 04/2022 | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 20.8 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=94, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (AV Pro V60) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (AV Pro V60) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (AV Pro V60) |
Networking - iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz (917 - 1727, n=9) | |
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=157, last 2 years) |
Display - Bright and with accurate colors
In our test unit, Razer uses an impressive 17.3-inch display with a 4K resolution (3840 x 2160 pixels) and 144 Hz refresh rate that offers a higher brightness (486.3 cd/m²) and shorter response times than the displays of the competitors. This also goes for the comparison with the QHD panel of the US sibling model that we already tested. The contrast of 1,143:1 is also at a high level, and we did not observe any PWM flickering during our measurements.
|
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 503 cd/m²
Contrast: 1143:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.08 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
87.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.151
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Alienware x17 R2 P48E AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Medion Erazer Beast X30 BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti BOE NE173QHM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -10% | -18% | -2% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.4 | 79.2 -20% | 67.7 -32% | 96.2 -3% | 98.7 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.8 0% | 97.6 -2% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 87.3 | 79.6 -9% | 69.2 -21% | 85.8 -2% | 86.2 -1% |
Response Times | -65% | -73% | -132% | -120% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 7.5 ? | 12.4 ? -65% | 14.7 ? -96% | 17.6 ? -135% | 17.6 ? -135% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.6 ? | 9.2 ? -64% | 8.4 ? -50% | 12.8 ? -129% | 11.4 ? -104% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -63% | -58% | -92% | -37% | |
Brightness middle | 503 | 365.4 -27% | 377 -25% | 334.8 -33% | 335.9 -33% |
Brightness | 486 | 344 -29% | 352 -28% | 305 -37% | 294 -40% |
Brightness Distribution | 84 | 85 1% | 86 2% | 79 -6% | 75 -11% |
Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.29 34% | 0.32 27% | 0.34 23% | 0.38 14% |
Contrast | 1143 | 1260 10% | 1178 3% | 985 -14% | 884 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.08 | 3.17 -194% | 2.91 -169% | 4.1 -280% | 2.82 -161% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.54 | 7.69 -69% | 6.78 -49% | 7.28 -60% | 5.04 -11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 0.51 15% | 1.3 -117% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.3 | 5.3 -308% | 3.4 -162% | 5.6 -331% | 1.7 -31% |
Gamma | 2.151 102% | 2.18 101% | 2.109 104% | 2.16 102% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6541 99% | 5879 111% | 7273 89% | 6314 103% | 6382 102% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -46% /
-52% | -50% /
-51% | -75% /
-77% | -53% /
-41% |
* ... smaller is better
In terms of the color reproduction and color space coverage, the 4K panel and the QHD panel of the sibling model are similar, with both models delivering good values of almost identical levels already in the state of delivery. The average color deviations remain within the target range of DeltaE < 3. A calibration brings further improvements, and our profile file is linked in the info window on the display above for your free download. However, the 4K panel shows some slight weakness in the blue tones even after the calibration. Both displays are able to cover the sRGB and DCI-P3 color spaces completely, and the AdobeRGB color space is at least covered to 86 and 87% respectively.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
7.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.1 ms rise | |
↘ 5.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17263 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
The IPS panel offers stable viewing angles and can be read from any angle. Thanks to the fairly high display brightness, you can also read its contents easily outdoors.
Performance - The Razer laptop uses Alder Lake and Ampere
With the Blade 17, Razer offers a 17.3-inch gaming laptop that is able to bring all the current games to the display smoothly.
Test Conditions
You can switch between the three available performance profiles ("Balanced," "Silent," and "User defined") by using the "Fn" + "P" key combination. The "User defined" profile allows you to set the sub-presets for the CPU ("Low," "Medium," "High," and "Boost") and GPU ("Low," "Medium," and "High") via the Razer Synapse software. In battery operation, the only profile available is "Balanced."
During our test, we used the "User defined" profile with the "Medium" (CPU) and "High" (GPU) sub-presets, which is the default setting in the state of delivery. In addition, we ran several benchmarks using the "Silent" profile, at maximum performance (CPU: "Boost", GPU: "High"), and in the dGPU mode. You can find the results in the charts below.
Processor
The Core i9-12900H processor (Alder Lake) consists of six performance cores (Hyperthreading, 2.5 to 5 GHz) and eight efficiency cores (no Hyperthreading, 1.8 to 3.8 GHz). In total, this results in 20 logical CPU cores.
During the CB15 Multi Thread test, the "Medium" CPU sub-preset ensures speeds (P cores: 2.6 to 2.7 GHz, E cores: 2.1 GHz) just above the basic clock speed. The Single Thread test completes with high clock speeds (P cores: 4 to 4.6 GHz, E cores: 2.1 to 3.7 GHz). In battery operation, the values are significantly lower.
Using the same CPU presets, the Core i9 only delivers a slight performance advantage in the peaks compared to the Core i7-12800H processor of the sibling model. This is not surprising, since both CPUs offer the same amount of cores and the Core i9 offers a slightly higher maximum speed (5 GHz vs. 4.8 GHz).
In multi-thread operation, the intensity of the Turbo usage depends a lot on the selected CPU sub-preset. In all cases, the CPU is able to run constantly at an even clock speed, which is shown by the CB15 loop test. It is noticeable that the CPU clock speed drops slightly from the first to the second/third run, regardless of the selected preset. The i9 CPU will only bring a noteworthy advantage to the user compared to the i7 CPU in some brief load peaks. Under longer loads, the performance gap between both processors is narrowing, and they end up very close to each other.
Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test
CPU Performance Rating - Percent | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (7359 - 19648, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Single Core | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1634 - 1921, n=27) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2681 - 7471, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (624 - 738, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=207, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1395 - 3077, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=204, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (235 - 277, n=28) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (160 - 451, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=196, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34684 - 76677, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5302 - 6289, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
Geekbench 5.5 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8519 - 14376, n=30) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Single-Core | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=202, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1631 - 1892, n=30) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=200, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (8.05 - 22.5, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36.8 - 59.8, n=27) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Lautlos) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (0.4218 - 0.506, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=201, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (4074 - 18289, n=27) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (22307 - 93236, n=27) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (1378 - 4215, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (78172 - 111241, n=27) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (5709 - 10410, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (11257 - 45581, n=27) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (31935 - 151546, n=27) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (449 - 1193, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (2235 - 10511, n=27) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=198, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (20960 - 48269, n=28) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
System Performance
The hardware of the smoothly running system delivers more than sufficient computing performance for gaming, video cutting, and rendering. The transfer rates of the working memory range at normal levels for the DDR5-4800 storage. They are accompanied by good PC Mark results.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=177, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (7139 - 8083, n=6) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (10254 - 11178, n=6) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9102 - 11186, n=6) | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=176, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (9847 - 12627, n=6) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1696 - 1965, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1622 - 1870, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1855 - 2135, n=3) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=160, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1483 - 1777, n=3) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4671 points | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6358 points | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5464 points | |
PCMark 10 Score | 7139 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (34438 - 74264, n=27) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (36365 - 74642, n=27) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=197, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (32276 - 67858, n=27) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800) | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E (v6.50.5800) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=197, last 2 years) | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US (v6.50.5800) | |
Average Intel Core i9-12900H (74.7 - 118.1, n=26) | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti (v6.50.5800) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 (v6.50.5800) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Max.) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (v6.50.5800, Lautlos) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies
The standardized Latency Monitor test (web surfing, 4k video reproduction, Prime95 High Load) revealed some conspicuous behavior in the DPC latencies. The system doesn't appear to be suited for real-time video and audio processing. Future software updates might lead to improvements or even make things worse.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Stealth GS77 12UHS-083US | |
Alienware x17 R2 P48E | |
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3080 Ti | |
Medion Erazer Beast X30 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Solution
Razer has equipped the Blade with a 1-TB SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280) from Samsung that delivers very good transfer rates. In addition, the laptop offers space for a second SSD (PCIe 4, M.2-2280).