Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 review: An unusual gaming laptop with a good battery life

Dynamic duo. A Ryzen 9 6900HX APU and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU bring all the current games smoothly to the matte 4k screen (IPS, DCI P3, FreeSync) in the 16:10 format. They are accompanied by 4 TB of storage (RAID 0), 64 GB of working memory, and a surprisingly good battery life.

With the Zephyrus Duo 16, Asus presents a laptop for gamers, streamers, and content creators, whose most striking feature becomes immediately apparent: Placed above the keyboard is a second display including touchscreen functionality (Screenpad Plus). The competitors include devices such as the Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model, the Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5, the MSI GE76 Raider, the Medion Erazer Beast X30, and the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX (ROG Zephyrus Duo Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-H (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 1395 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 30.0.15.1259, Optimus
Memory
64 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS level, FreeSync Premium, Pantone Validated, (second screen: 14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, IPS level, capacitive, stylus support), glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Soundcard
Realtek ALC285
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 355 x 266 ( = 0.81 x 13.98 x 10.47 in)
Battery
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, palm rest, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.56 kg ( = 90.3 oz / 5.64 pounds), Power Supply: 850 g ( = 29.98 oz / 1.87 pounds)
Price
4999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.2 %
05/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
92.5 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
88.3 %
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.5 %
01/2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.7 %
05/2022
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg23 mm17.30"2560x1440
84.7 %
03/2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400

Case - GX650 with a robust metal case

The matte black metal case offers a good workmanship. There are no apparent gaps and no noticeable sharp edges. Another positive point is that the base unit cannot be warped. On the other hand, the lid could use a bit more stiffness. The hinges are able to hold the lid tightly in position. The maximum opening angle is about 130 degrees, and you can open the lid with one hand.

Once you open the display lid, the Screenpad, a second display with touchscreen functionality, is raised by a fixed angle of about 15 degrees towards the user. In addition, it is moved by about 2 cm (~0.8 in) toward the main screen. The resulting gap shows a transparent plastic plate that offers a glimpse into the insides of the case in some places. The raising of the Screenpad has not only ergonomic reasons, but there are also vent openings below the display to allow air flow into the case.

The Zephyrus is one of the heavier laptops in our comparison field. Only the MSI GE76 Raider is heavier. The dimensions also turn out slightly larger than comparable 16-inch laptops such as the MacBook Pro 16.

Size Comparison

397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 3 kg6.65 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.2 kg4.94 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 248.5 mm / 9.78 inch 22.4 mm / 0.882 inch 2.3 kg5.05 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 266 mm / 10.5 inch 20.5 mm / 0.807 inch 2.6 kg5.64 lbs355.7 mm / 14 inch 248.1 mm / 9.77 inch 16.8 mm / 0.661 inch 2.2 kg4.85 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2.1 kg4.61 lbs297 mm / 11.7 inch 210 mm / 8.27 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Equipment - The Zephyrus does not offer Thunderbolt 4

All four USB connections (2x USB-A, 2x USB-C) support the USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard. One of the two USB-C ports offers Power Delivery, and both ports support DisplayPort via USB-C. With this, the laptop offers three video output ports together with the HDMI 2.1 connection. The connections are completed by a combined audio port and a Gigabit Ethernet port.

Left side: power, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery, G-Sync), storage card reader (MicroSD), audio combo
Left side: power, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery, G-Sync), storage card reader (MicroSD), audio combo
Right side: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)
Right side: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI 2.1
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI 2.1

SD Card Reader

The MicroSD storage card reader is one of the fast models with maximum transfer rates of 155 MB/s (transferring 250 jpg image files of about 5 MB each) and 185 MB/s (copying large data blocks) using our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference storage card.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=101, last 2 years)
98.9 MB/s -36%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79.9 MB/s -48%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66 MB/s -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
185 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=95, last 2 years)
122.3 MB/s -34%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s -55%

Communication

The WLAN transfer rates determined under optimal conditions (with no additional WLAN devices nearby and the laptop and server PC in close proximity) turn out excellent and correspond to the capabilities of the WiFi chip (Mediatek MT7922; 802.11 ax, WiFi 6E). Wired network connections are handled by a Gigabit Ethernet chip (RTL8125) from Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1695 (1556min - 1768max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1503 (1451min - 1558max) MBit/s -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1333 (1044min - 1390max) MBit/s -21%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (358 - 1785, n=38)
1328 MBit/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1793, n=154, last 2 years)
1271 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1721 (1500min - 1744max) MBit/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1692 (1567min - 1738max) MBit/s
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (848 - 1775, n=38)
1435 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (685 - 1890, n=160, last 2 years)
1403 MBit/s -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1030 (752min - 1313max) MBit/s -39%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1029 (752-1313)
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (588-1235)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1044-1390)
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1235 (650-1337)

Webcam

The 0.9 MP webcam of the Zephyrus produces images with a maximum resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. It lacks color accuracy, and the colors deviate significantly from the target. The camera does not possess a mechanical cover.

ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.32 ∆E

Accessories

In addition to the usual documentation (quick start manual and warranty information), the laptop also includes a rubber palm rest.

Maintenance

To take off the bottom of the case, you first have to remove the screws at the bottom. But you need to pay attention, since one of the screws in the middle of the case is covered by a little rubber plate. The back of the case is also kept in place by some clips that can be loosened by some careful wiggling or with the help of a flat prying tool. After removing the case bottom, you get access to the working memory banks (both occupied), the two SSDs (PCIe 4), the fans, and the battery.

Insides of the GX650RX
Insides of the GX650RX

Warranty

Asus offers a 2-year warranty on the Zephyrus. A warranty extension to 3 years will cost an extra 129 Euros (~$136).

Input Devices - A second display for the Asus laptop

Keyboard

The keyboard only allows for comfortable typing if you use the included palm rest made from rubber (depth: ~5.5 cm, 2.2 in, angled). While it does a fairly good job, it really only works on a fixed surface. The smooth keys of the illuminated chiclet keyboard have a short stroke and clear pressure point. The key resistance is okay, and the keyboard doesn't bend while typing. The three-step RGB illumination is controlled via a function key. Overall, Asus delivers a keyboard here that is suitable for everyday tasks.

Touchpad

A multitouch-capable Clickpad (~5.8 x 9.6 cm, ~2.3 x 3.8 in) in portrait orientation serves as the mouse replacement. Its smooth surface facilitates sliding of the fingers. The pad has a short stroke and clear pressure point. Tapping the corresponding symbol on the pad will display a number pad.

Zephyrus Duo input devices
Zephyrus Duo input devices

Asus Screenpad Plus

There is an additional input option in form of the Screenpad Plus (14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, matte), which is a second display that includes touchscreen functionality (support for active input pens). It behaves like any other plugged-in external display and can be turned on and off via separate key.

The Screenpad gives the option to move applications or their navigation elements to the touchscreen. The latter depends on whether the application supports this. For example, we are able to move the chat window to the Screenpad, while a game is running on the main screen.

There are several small apps preinstalled that give an impression of the possibilities of the Screenpad. For example, there is a calculator and a field for handwriting input, and a Quick Key application bundles often used functions such as cut, copy, and paste.

Display - Good color reproduction

The brightness (433.9 cd/m²) and contrast (1043:1) of the matte 16-inch display (3840 x 2400 pixels) fulfill the requirements. Positive points are the fast response times and lack of PWM flickering.

The display supports AMD's FreeSync technology, which dynamically adjusts the refresh rates of the display and frame rates of the GPU to each other. In this way, the created image is supposed to be as smooth as possible, particularly during computer games.

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
Light halos
Light halos
464
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE160QAM-NX1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 464 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 433.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X30
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Display
-23%
-22%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
98
65.3
-33%
63.1
-36%
67.7
-31%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
85.1
-15%
94
-6%
97.6
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.3
67.4
-22%
65.2
-24%
69.2
-20%
Response Times
-9%
-5%
-26%
74%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
71%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
62%
14.7 ?(7, 7.7)
-1%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
84%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
-88%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-71%
8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2)
-50%
2 ?(1, 1)
64%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(58)
Screen
329%
27%
20%
3%
456%
Brightness middle
459
507
10%
330
-28%
290
-37%
377
-18%
368
-20%
Brightness
434
494
14%
315
-27%
290
-33%
352
-19%
368
-15%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
89
1%
96
9%
86
-2%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.02
95%
0.24
45%
0.23
48%
0.32
27%
0.01
98%
Contrast
1043
25350
2330%
1375
32%
1261
21%
1178
13%
36800
3428%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.97
1.4
53%
1.47
51%
1.59
46%
2.91
2%
2.33
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.13
2.8
66%
2.73
66%
3.17
61%
6.78
17%
4.34
47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.03
0.63
39%
0.87
16%
1.3
-26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
2.3
53%
1.8
63%
2.5
49%
3.4
31%
0.8
84%
Gamma
2.235 98%
2.27 97%
2.282 96%
2.253 98%
2.109 104%
2.119 104%
CCT
6775 96%
6792 96%
6499 100%
6640 98%
7273 89%
6569 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
329% / 329%
-2% / 11%
-2% / 8%
-14% / -6%
265% / 380%

* ... smaller is better

The X Rite Pantone certification of the display ensures a very natural color reproduction. Correspondingly, the color display is fairly accurate already in the state of delivery. While the color deviation remains within the target limits, a calibration still brings significant improvements. The screen is able to display the sRGB (99.9%) and DCI-P3 (98%) color spaces almost completely, and 86% of the AdobeRGB color space are also covered.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs sRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs sRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs AdobeRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs AdobeRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs P3
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.7 ms rise
↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 23 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17853 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the IPS panel are stable, and it can be read from any angle. The display can be read outdoors, if the sunlight isn't too bright.

The Zephyrus outdoors
The Zephyrus outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Rembrandt meets Ampere

With the Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, Asus offers a 16-inch laptop that is primarily positioned as a gaming laptop. However, the device is also targeted towards streamers and content creators.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia System Info
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Test Conditions

The laptop offers three manufacturer specific performance profiles ("Silent", "Performance", and "Turbo"), and you can switch between them by using the "Fn" + "F5" key combination. The "Turbo" profile can only be used in mains operation. Our battery tests were performed using the "Silent" profile and all the benchmarks with the "Performance" profile activated.

Performance Turbo Silent
Power Limit 1 80 Watt 100 Watt 70 Watt
Power Limit 2 80 Watt 125 Watt 70 Watt

The preinstalled Armoury Crate software allows you to create individual profiles ("Manual"). For example, we configured the power limits of the CPU and the dynamic boost of the GPU individually. You can also overclock the graphics storage.

 
 

Processor

The CPU segment of the Ryzen 9 6900HX APU (Rembrandt) consists of an octa-core processor that runs at a basic clock speed of 3.3 GHz. The speed can be increased up to 4.9 GHz via Turbo. Simultaneous multithreading (two threads per core) is supported.

The multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark briefly runs at clock speeds between 4 and 4.4 GHz, and the single-thread test between 3.1 and 4.7 GHz. In battery operation, the CPU runs at 3 to 4.1 GHz (multithread) and 2 to 4.7 GHz (single-thread).

Multithread (mains operation)
Multithread (mains operation)
Single-thread (mains operation)
Single-thread (mains operation)

We evaluate whether the CPU Turbo is used constantly in mains operation by running the multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark for at least 30 minutes in a constant loop. The Turbo is used at a high level. By using the "Turbo" performance profile, the clock speed can be increased still slightly higher.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Leise: Ø2069 (2039.36-2194.43)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Turbo: Ø2369 (2355.85-2411.64)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Silent)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Silent)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2292 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Help
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
81.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
80.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
79.7 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
74 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
68.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
66.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
65.5 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max -5!
Apple M1 Max
64.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
63.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
58.9 pt
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 34613, n=233, last 2 years)
19665 Points +40%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18935 Points +34%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
15100 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
13966 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9709 - 15100, n=19)
13307 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12385 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points -31%
Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 2235, n=231, last 2 years)
1819 Points +16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1659 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
1576 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
1570 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1516 - 1616, n=19)
1565 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1530 Points -2%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 13769, n=231, last 2 years)
7476 Points +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7203 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points +26%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
5813 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
5403 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (3742 - 5813, n=19)
5162 Points -6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
2735 Points -50%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 855, n=231, last 2 years)
701 Points +18%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
612 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
610 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (595 - 631, n=19)
610 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
390 Points -34%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 5663, n=235, last 2 years)
3107 Points +36%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points +27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2854 Points +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
2411 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
2194 Points -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1588 - 2411, n=19)
2163 Points -6%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)
1693 (1667min - 1693max) Points -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points -32%
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points +12%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 318, n=234, last 2 years)
269 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
253 Points +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (241 - 261, n=19)
250 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
249 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
240 Points -4%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)
197 Points -21%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds * -39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
242 Seconds * -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (212 - 357, n=21)
239 Seconds * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
212 Seconds * +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 1259, n=229, last 2 years)
198.5 Seconds * +10%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Blender 3.0 beta for mac)
189 Seconds * +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
175.8 Seconds * +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 140932, n=230, last 2 years)
77594 MIPS +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
73485 MIPS +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
65336 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
63706 MIPS -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (49526 - 65336, n=20)
60091 MIPS -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS +8%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 7581, n=230, last 2 years)
6143 MIPS +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
5920 MIPS +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
5813 MIPS +2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5090 - 6070, n=20)
5799 MIPS +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5257 MIPS -8%
Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points +36%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 22200, n=235, last 2 years)
13683 Points +35%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12708 Points +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
12559 Points +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
10490 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
10071 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (8313 - 10490, n=21)
9642 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points -6%
Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points +20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 2210, n=235, last 2 years)
1814 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1782 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
1604 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1596 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1523 - 1652, n=21)
1589 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
1523 Points -4%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 37.6, n=233, last 2 years)
21.3 fps +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
20.5 fps +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
18.7 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
17.6 fps -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (12.6 - 18.7, n=20)
16.7 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps -35%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (44.8 - 81.7, n=20)
53.1 s * -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
49.5 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 332, n=227, last 2 years)
49.2 s * -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
45.2 s * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
44.8 s * -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s * +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * +13%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4936 sec * -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (0.4627 - 0.4974, n=20)
0.483 sec * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
0.4808 sec * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
0.4742 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 4.47, n=230, last 2 years)
0.468 sec * +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec * +6%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * +13%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
92.6 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.8 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
87.4 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
82.1 pt
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
68.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
68.4 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
49.6 pt
AIDA64
FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (3069 - 60169, n=226, last 2 years)
18737 KRay/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
17963 KRay/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
16852 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
16192 KRay/s -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10950 - 17963, n=20)
15327 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9405 KRay/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9065 KRay/s -46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
8265 KRay/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5839 KRay/s -65%
FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
110797 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
103794 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
101849 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (71414 - 110797, n=20)
96546 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (18567 - 252486, n=226, last 2 years)
94087 Points -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
42843 Points -59%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40570 Points -61%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
38277 Points -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
27801 Points -73%
CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 10389, n=226, last 2 years)
4354 MB/s +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
3804 MB/s +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3547 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
3480 MB/s -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3354 MB/s -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (2471 - 3804, n=20)
3301 MB/s -7%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3178 MB/s -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
2931 MB/s -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
2013 MB/s -43%
CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 200651, n=226, last 2 years)
109943 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
107042 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
107007 Points +2%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106414 Points +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106369 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
104920 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
104649 Points 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (84185 - 107544, n=20)
100656 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
85965 Points -18%
FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
13062 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
12957 Points 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
12955 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (10970 - 13205, n=20)
12630 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 32988, n=226, last 2 years)
12240 Points -6%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10237 Points -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10226 Points -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9655 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
7027 Points -46%
FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
61370 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
56121 Points -2%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (39164 - 61370, n=20)
52842 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (10291 - 134044, n=226, last 2 years)
48123 Points -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
26859 Points -53%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
24693 Points -57%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
22873 Points -60%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
15765 Points -73%
CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
140776 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
139407 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
137667 MB/s -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (54613 - 142360, n=20)
115891 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=226, last 2 years)
108037 MB/s -23%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
100062 MB/s -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
91041 MB/s -35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
67814 MB/s -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65871 MB/s -53%
CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 2409, n=226, last 2 years)
1219 MB/s +37%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1174 MB/s +32%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1085 MB/s +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
988 MB/s +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
911 MB/s +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
890 MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
863 MB/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (578 - 911, n=20)
803 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
701 MB/s -21%
FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (1518 - 31796, n=226, last 2 years)
10143 KRay/s +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
9540 KRay/s +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9001 KRay/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
8759 KRay/s -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5798 - 9540, n=20)
8175 KRay/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5596 KRay/s -38%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5239 KRay/s -42%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
4776 KRay/s -47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3257 KRay/s -64%
CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40095 MPixel/s +35%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40000 MPixel/s +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
39666 MPixel/s +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
38990 MPixel/s +31%
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=227, last 2 years)
36905 MPixel/s +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
29975 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
29894 MPixel/s +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
29705 MPixel/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (26873 - 30604, n=20)
29389 MPixel/s -1%

System Performance

The smoothly running system offers sufficient performance for gaming, video editing, and rendering for the next few years. The transfer rates of the built-in working memory remain beneath the values of comparable laptops that are equipped with DDR5-4800 storage. This is accompanied by very good PC-Mark results.

The working memory runs in dual-channel mode.
The working memory runs in dual-channel mode.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4418 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5798 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4622 points
PCMark 10 Score
6351 points
Help
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (5235 - 9852, n=199, last 2 years)
7597 Points +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7149 Points +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (8300 - 12334, n=198, last 2 years)
10732 Points +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9870 Points +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 11833, n=198, last 2 years)
9727 Points +26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9173 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (6462 - 18475, n=198, last 2 years)
11498 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10951 Points +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points
CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2334, n=171, last 2 years)
1882 Points +10%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1727 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1586 Points -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=171, last 2 years)
1792 Points +6%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1585 Points -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1361 Points -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
2102 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2514, n=171, last 2 years)
2048 Points +19%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1985 Points +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=171, last 2 years)
1705 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1471 Points -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1080 Points -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62554 MB/s +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62419 MB/s +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61946 MB/s +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61605 MB/s +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 92565, n=226, last 2 years)
59609 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (47938 - 53345, n=20)
50405 MB/s -5%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65865 MB/s +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65835 MB/s +23%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65452 MB/s +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65277 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (24879 - 90647, n=226, last 2 years)
63567 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
53321 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (43892 - 53321, n=20)
51062 MB/s -4%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65772 MB/s +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65159 MB/s +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
64282 MB/s +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61981 MB/s +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (21619 - 103259, n=226, last 2 years)
61782 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
57180 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (51085 - 57202, n=20)
55188 MB/s -3%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
95.2 ns * -3%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
92.6 ns * -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
92.3 ns *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
89.7 ns * +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (80.7 - 120.6, n=20)
88.7 ns * +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 152.5, n=223, last 2 years)
87.2 ns * +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

The standardized Latency Monitor test (web surfing, 4k video reproduction, Prime95 high load) revealed some conspicuous delays in the DPC latencies. The system doesn't appear to be suited for real-time video and audio processing. However, future software updates might lead to some improvements or even make things worse.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs * -827%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * -215%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
879.6 μs * -69%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

Two PCIe 4 SSDs (M.2-2280) with a storage capacity of 2 TB are combined in a RAID 0 array, so the operating system sees the two SSDs as a single 4-TB SSD. All the data to be stored is distributed across both SSDs. The resulting high transfer rates and short load times are optimal for games.

Two PCIe 4 SSDs...
Two PCIe 4 SSDs...
...form a RAID 0 array.
...form a RAID 0 array.
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 9490 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 10135 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 563.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 412 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 5266 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 9867 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 71.92 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 327.5 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
81.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
75.5 pt
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
73.6 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.4 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
71.3 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
58.6 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
4903 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3946 (3883.92min - 3946.42max) MB/s -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3887 MB/s -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3819 (3405.77min - 3819.33max) MB/s -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=198, last 2 years)
3528 MB/s -28%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2529 (2450.31min - 2528.54max) MB/s -48%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7889 (6495.73min - 7888.81max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
4457 MB/s -44%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3923 (3818.83min - 3922.64max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3899 (3880.57min - 3898.61max) MB/s -51%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3863 (3808.78min - 3862.78max) MB/s -51%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=198, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s -52%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
10557 (9742.97min - 10557.3max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7028 (6634.28min - 7027.76max) MB/s -33%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6722 (5765.49min - 6722max) MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6666 (5850.89min - 6666.43max) MB/s -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6643 (6200.62min - 6642.94max) MB/s -37%
Average of class Gaming
  (2268 - 16089, n=198, last 2 years)
6370 MB/s -40%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9830 (9799.27min - 9829.82max) MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5004 (4980.32min - 5004.43max) MB/s -49%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4999 (4978.75min - 4998.98max) MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4951 (4938.35min - 4951.38max) MB/s -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4939 (4931.24min - 4938.77max) MB/s -50%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=198, last 2 years)
4804 MB/s -51%
4k q1 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
90.6 (86.51min - 90.63max) MB/s +24%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.8 (89.42min - 89.75max) MB/s +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
88.7 MB/s +21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
87.3 (86.6min - 87.26max) MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
73.1 (72.79min - 73.06max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=198, last 2 years)
67.6 MB/s -8%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
373 (371.9min - 373.21max) MB/s +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
359 (324.09min - 358.58max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
275 (273.95min - 275.11max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
252 (240.11min - 252.24max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (66.6 - 421, n=198, last 2 years)
224 MB/s -38%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
210 (209.55min - 210.02max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4073 (4064.94min - 4073.47max) MB/s +70%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3908 (3879.66min - 3907.88max) MB/s +64%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3555 (3552.55min - 3555.1max) MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3493 (3465.14min - 3493.06max) MB/s +46%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=198, last 2 years)
2578 MB/s +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2390 (2226.95min - 2390.15max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3612 (3585.78min - 3612.01max) MB/s +134%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3004 (2951.07min - 3004.3max) MB/s +95%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2645 (2612.9min - 2645.36max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=198, last 2 years)
2143 MB/s +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1542 (1501.74min - 1541.63max) MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1066 (1060.72min - 1066.17max) MB/s -31%
AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
9380 Points +41%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8982 Points +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8658 Points +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8103 Points +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=186, last 2 years)
6807 Points +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6635 Points
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3634 Points +39%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3344 Points +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3192 Points +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3054 Points +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2619 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (760 - 4721, n=186, last 2 years)
2494 Points -5%
Score Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3997 Points +56%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3991 Points +56%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3893 Points +52%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3545 Points +39%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=186, last 2 years)
3105 Points +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2556 Points
Seq Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5588 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
5344.88 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5205 MB/s -3%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5120 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5098.67 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=186, last 2 years)
4950 MB/s -7%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7663.27 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3936 MB/s -49%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3872.7 MB/s -49%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3692 MB/s -52%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=186, last 2 years)
3663 MB/s -52%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3267 MB/s -57%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
109.4 MB/s +59%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
82.8 MB/s +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.55 MB/s +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
76.99 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
68.93 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (30.4 - 112.1, n=186, last 2 years)
66.6 MB/s -3%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
328.69 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
321.6 MB/s -2%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
241.3 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming
  (96.3 - 512, n=186, last 2 years)
210 MB/s -36%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
201.1 MB/s -39%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
176.69 MB/s -46%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2966 MB/s +47%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2749 MB/s +36%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2604.76 MB/s +29%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2451.55 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2015.68 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (442 - 3475, n=186, last 2 years)
1927 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3387 MB/s +132%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3342 MB/s +129%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3329.28 MB/s +128%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2950.05 MB/s +102%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=186, last 2 years)
2531 MB/s +73%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1460.96 MB/s
Access Time Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.057 ms * -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.056 ms * -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=184, last 2 years)
0.05345 ms * -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
0.053 ms *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.044 ms * +17%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.029 ms * +45%
Access Time Write
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=186, last 2 years)
0.04684 ms * -260%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms * -77%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * -62%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.018 ms * -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
0.013 ms *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.012 ms * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

05301060159021202650318037104240477053005830636068907420795084809010954010070Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0): Ø8257 (5868.26-10519.1)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6642 (6357.38-6687.03)
MSI GE76 Raider Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB: Ø4011 (3422.21-6714.24)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø6290 (5297.3-6328.92)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Phison ESR01TBMFCT: Ø7004 (6456.5-7039.72)

Graphics Card

The actual performance of an RTX 3000 GPU depends on several factors: the cooling, the storage equipment, and the maximum TGP that a manufacturer configures within the limits defined by Nvidia. Asus allows the GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU a maximum TGP of 165 watts (140 watts + 25 watts dynamic boost). The GPU is able to use fast GDDR6 graphics storage (16,384 MB).

According to Asus, the dynamic boost (10 watts max.) is only available if the "Turbo" performance profile is selected, and the Witcher 3 test confirms this. The maximum (25 watts) would need to be enabled using the Armoury Crate software ("Manual" profile). The benchmark results range just above the RTX 3080 Ti average that we determined so far.

But this isn't the end of it. There is also the option of direct image output via GeForce GPU (Armoury Crate, MUX switch: separate GPU). In combination with a manual increase of the dynamic boost to 25 watts, the graphics performance increases noticeably.

Fire Strike (mains operation)
Fire Strike (mains operation)
Fire Strike (mains operation)
Fire Strike (mains operation)
Fire Strike (mains operation, Turbo)
Fire Strike (mains operation, Turbo)
Fire Strike (mains operation, Silent)
Fire Strike (mains operation, Silent)
Fire Strike (mains operation, sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25 watts)
Fire Strike (mains operation, sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25 watts)
The image output can be switched to the GeForce GPU via mouse click
The image output can be switched to the GeForce GPU via mouse click
3DMark 11 Performance
31771 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
47119 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
24278 points
Help
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
100 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
97.5 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
96.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X30 -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
91.4 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
90.3 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -2!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
83.6 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
83.6 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 -1!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
75.2 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
73.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -25!
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
57.9 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
45050 Points +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
44012 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)
42275 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
41590 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72070, n=232, last 2 years)
40563 Points +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40257 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
33249 Points -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
31565 Points -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
14745 Points -63%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)
34080 Points +24%
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
34041 Points +24%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
31082 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=237, last 2 years)
29512 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27562 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
26460 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
25240 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
24580 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
14198 Points -48%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13324 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)
13302 Points +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
12269 Points +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22547, n=234, last 2 years)
12083 Points +8%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
12060 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11227 Points
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
9646 Points -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
9515 Points -15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
9488 Points -15%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
8462 Points +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (sep. GPU, 25W)
8139 Points +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
7919 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6423 - 8462, n=28)
7800 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (280 - 14457, n=153, last 2 years)
7747 Points +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
7733 Points +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
7329 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
7251 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
6423 Points -12%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (87.4 - 179, n=21, last 2 years)
118.4 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (62.9 - 133.4, n=8)
108.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
108.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
102.3 fps -6%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (16.2 - 99.6, n=21, last 2 years)
29.6 fps +40%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (18.3 - 25.3, n=8)
22.3 fps +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
21.2 fps
Showcase (showcase-02)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
148.9 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (25.9 - 281, n=21, last 2 years)
148.4 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (110 - 175, n=8)
146.6 fps -2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
127.2 fps -15%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Gaming
  (57.2 - 122.8, n=21, last 2 years)
78.8 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
75.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (65.3 - 79.1, n=8)
74.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
71.9 fps -4%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Gaming
  (83.7 - 601, n=21, last 2 years)
340 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (212 - 430, n=8)
321 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
308.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
275.8 fps -10%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.3 - 74.7, n=21, last 2 years)
35.4 fps +36%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
26.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19.3 - 27.3, n=8)
24.5 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.7 fps -17%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Gaming
  (70.4 - 461, n=21, last 2 years)
254 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (177.4 - 311, n=8)
249 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
239.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
215.7 fps -10%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Gaming
  (47.7 - 344, n=21, last 2 years)
177.5 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
171.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (130.4 - 190.3, n=8)
170 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
161.6 fps -6%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (49.1 - 373, n=21, last 2 years)
229 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (161 - 260, n=8)
223 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
210.2 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
208.7 fps
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming
  (29.9 - 515, n=23, last 2 years)
292 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
210.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (174.7 - 211, n=3)
198.6 fps
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (2.93 - 231, n=36, last 2 years)
32.8 fps +55%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (18.1 - 25, n=6)
21.8 fps +3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
21.1 fps
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (23.5 - 59.9, n=36, last 2 years)
38.8 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
38.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33 - 40.2, n=6)
37.4 fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
36.2 fps -6%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (99.8 - 687, n=34, last 2 years)
397 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (248 - 456, n=6)
351 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
336 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
308.7 fps -8%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (20.6 - 76.5, n=36, last 2 years)
42.3 fps +61%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
26.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19.6 - 27, n=6)
23.7 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
21.6 fps -18%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (44 - 141.9, n=35, last 2 years)
103.5 fps +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (55.3 - 114.7, n=6)
92.3 fps +7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
89.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
86.4 fps
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (17.8 - 117.2, n=36, last 2 years)
70.5 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (51.8 - 78.7, n=6)
67.4 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
66.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
65.1 fps -2%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
128.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (99.2 - 153, n=6)
128.4 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 221, n=36, last 2 years)
122.5 fps -5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
121.5 fps -6%
3840x2160 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Gaming
  (97.2 - 255, n=6, last 2 years)
192.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (87.9 - 255, n=4)
137.6 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
104.1 fps
3840x2160 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Gaming
  (16.8 - 67.8, n=12, last 2 years)
26.3 fps +45%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (15.5 - 21.1, n=7)
18.9 fps +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18.1 fps
3840x2160 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (10.9 - 56, n=12, last 2 years)
25.1 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13.2 - 34.3, n=7)
17.9 fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
16.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
14.5 fps -10%
3840x2160 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (137 - 474, n=12, last 2 years)
284 fps +76%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (137.4 - 345, n=7)
208 fps +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
161.1 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
152.1 fps -6%
3840x2160 Energy (energy-03)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
118.7 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (27.7 - 118.7, n=7)
65.1 fps -45%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
64.6 fps -46%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.83 - 118.7, n=12, last 2 years)
57.5 fps -52%
3840x2160 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Gaming
  (60.8 - 132, n=12, last 2 years)
95 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49 - 93.3, n=7)
77.4 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
73.5 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
70.4 fps -4%
3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Gaming
  (13.5 - 109, n=12, last 2 years)
54.7 fps +36%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.3 - 69.6, n=7)
43.7 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40.3 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
37.6 fps -7%
3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Gaming
  (61.6 - 199, n=12, last 2 years)
106.8 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (69.5 - 144, n=7)
95.7 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
87.9 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
84.4 fps -4%

Gaming Performance

The hardware brings all the current games smoothly to the screen in FHD to QHD resolution and maximum settings. Using the full display resolution of 3840 x 2400 pixels requires reduced settings at times. The frame rates range around the RTX 3080 Ti average. The direct image output via GeForce GPU (MUX switch: separate GPU) in combination with an increase of the dynamic boost to 25 watt leads to a slight increase of the frame rates.

The low frame rates when the "Silent" profile is activated are due to the "Whisper mode 2.0" of the GeForce GPU, which is supposed to keep the noise level as low as possible while the frame rate level is still sufficient for a game (at least 30 to 60 fps). This means that the GPU doesn't have to run at full power, thus producing less heat and allowing the fans to remain quieter.

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126 (108min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)
124.4 (20.1min, 40.2P0.1, 88.9P1) fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
120.7 (22.4min, 49.9P0.1, 82.6P1) fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
117.4 (26.9min, 30.4P0.1, 81.6P1) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8.61 - 216, n=228, last 2 years)
117.3 fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.1 (30min, 41.5P0.1, 74.7P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 (19.1min, 45.8P0.1, 67.7P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.3 (64min) fps -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)
60 (33.6min, 39P0.1, 47.5P1) fps -46%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (42.8 - 107.6, n=16, last 2 years)
67.1 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44.8 - 62.7, n=5)
56.4 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54.4 (30.3min, 36.3P0.1, 43.6P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
44.8 (14.7min, 26.1P0.1, 36.7P1) fps -18%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
160 (139.4min) fps +44%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156 (137min) fps +40%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
145.1 (124.5min) fps +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (26.9 - 220, n=239, last 2 years)
143.1 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (29.9 - 170.5, n=45)
141.1 fps +27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)
118.5 (101.8min) fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
115 (97.7min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.3 (96.1min) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
59.9 (57.1min) fps -46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)
59.6 (57.5min) fps -46%
3840x2160 ultra (3/3) best looking
Average of class Gaming
  (14.2 - 205, n=81, last 2 years)
136.7 fps +53%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (70.8 - 155.6, n=19)
124.8 fps +40%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112 (98.7min) fps +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)
105.5 (92.7min) fps +18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
92.3 (81.3min) fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.2 (77.6min) fps
X-Plane 11.11
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (12 - 145.5, n=76, last 2 years)
96.6 fps +46%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.9 - 109.5, n=20)
82.7 fps +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.6 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
66.7 fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.1 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)
58.5 fps -11%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
109 fps +39%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps +38%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.4 - 166.2, n=244, last 2 years)
102.1 fps +31%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.6 - 127, n=45)
101.1 fps +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.3 fps +27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.4 fps +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)
82.8 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
79.7 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)
60.4 fps -23%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.2 - 94.7, n=68, last 2 years)
62.6 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)
58.4 fps +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)
55.4 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (35.1 - 61.2, n=18)
52.7 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
51.4 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Leise)
47.2 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
40.1 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (86min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, sep. GPU, 25W)
125.1 fps +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3, Turbo)
118.5 fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)
113.8 fps +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (9.13 - 194.9, n=229, last 2 years)
111.5 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
108 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
90.4 fps -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
89.4 fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.3)
85.8 fps -21%
GTA V
3840x2160 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 90.9, n=49, last 2 years)
64.3 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
63.2 (14.7min, 47.6P1) fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
59 (14.1min, 43.5P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (37.7 - 67.2, n=14)
58.6 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41.8 (13min, 32.3P1) fps -29%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
125 (10.6min, 83.3P1) fps +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (20.6min, 76.9P1) fps +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 139.2, n=42)
111 fps +9%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110.9 (20.6min, 71.4P1) fps +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6.38 - 167.7, n=219, last 2 years)
107.6 fps +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (sep. GPU, 25W)
106.6 (3.82min, 71.4P1) fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Turbo)
102.7 (18.1min, 76.9P1) fps +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.5 (21.1min, 71.4P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.4 (7.56min, 62.5P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (Leise)
60 (11.5min, 58.8P1) fps -41%
F1 2021
3840x2160 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
Average of class Gaming
  (47.6 - 115.1, n=22, last 2 years)
71.6 fps +19%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
68 (59min) fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)
66.4 (58min, 57P1) fps +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)
64.4 (56min, 53P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (41.1 - 70.2, n=18)
60.9 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)
60 (51min, 49P1) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)
56.5 (50min, 47P1) fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)
47.3 (39min, 38P1) fps -21%
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
157 (132min) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, sep. GPU, 25W)
155.9 (129min, 120P1) fps +20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Turbo)
142.1 (121min, 103P1) fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)
130.2 (109min, 92P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931)
126.3 (112min, 91P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.2 - 160.6, n=30)
126.1 fps -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (13.5 - 271, n=63, last 2 years)
118.4 fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (852849)
103 (76min, 83P1) fps -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (874931, Leise)
60 (59min, 57P1) fps -54%
Strange Brigade
3840x2160 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (54.5 - 298, n=57, last 2 years)
113.2 fps +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)
92.9 (64.3min, 67.3P1) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (61.7 - 100.7, n=15)
87.6 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
84.5 (30.7min, 66.2P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
68.4 (41.3min, 58.5P1) fps -19%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
221 (94.6min, 162P1) fps +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, sep. GPU, 25W)
221 (76.3min, 154.1P1) fps +21%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.6 - 421, n=227, last 2 years)
207 fps +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
196.3 (44.4min, 139.6P1) fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Turbo)
194.9 (119.9min, 137.3P1) fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (42.3 - 224, n=41)
187.3 fps +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
182.4 (66.8min, 132.6P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
151 (35.4min, 116P1) fps -17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)
149.8 (29.6min, 114.2P1) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leise)
60 (44min, 59.5P1) fps -67%
Far Cry 5
3840x2160 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (39 - 113, n=33, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +33%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (45 - 76, n=9)
67.6 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60 (54min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
45 (37min) fps -25%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (111 - 162, n=24)
133 fps +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
130 (93min) fps +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (14 - 218, n=126, last 2 years)
126.2 fps +14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122 (97min) fps +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (82min) fps
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
49.9 (28.1min) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39.2 - 49.9, n=7)
43.3 fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.6 - 74, n=38, last 2 years)
43 fps +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40.3 (29.8min) fps
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (4.3 - 56, n=39, last 2 years)
34 fps +35%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (19.6 - 32.4, n=6)
27.1 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25.2 (16.6min) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
19.6 (13min) fps -22%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.1 (29min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (54 - 144.1, n=16)
93.6 fps -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 159.7, n=101, last 2 years)
86.7 fps -13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.2 (55.1min) fps -26%
Far Cry 6
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
114 (96min) fps +32%
Average of class Gaming
  (14.7 - 167, n=35, last 2 years)
98.8 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (71.3 - 114, n=6)
98.7 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86.2 (65min) fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
71.3 (59min) fps -17%
3840x2160 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (3.38 - 92, n=18, last 2 years)
62.1 fps +34%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57 (47min) fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (46.2 - 57, n=4)
52.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46.2 (42min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (91 - 92, n=3)
91.3 fps
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91 (81min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (53 - 119, n=11, last 2 years)
86.5 fps
Rainbow Six Extraction
1920x1080 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
169 (107min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
159 (114min) fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (128 - 169, n=3)
152 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (33 - 314, n=16, last 2 years)
133.3 fps -21%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
128 fps -24%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset (with Fixed Resolution Quality)
Average of class Gaming
  (37 - 112, n=5, last 2 years)
69.3 fps +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57 (30min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (44 - 57, n=2)
50.5 fps -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
44 (19min) fps -23%
Ghostwire Tokyo
1920x1080 Highest Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
143.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (125 - 143.3, n=2)
134.2 fps -6%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
125 (28.2min, 41.7P0.1, 80.1P1) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.1 - 231, n=19, last 2 years)
119 fps -17%
3840x2160 Highest Settings
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
59.9 (20.5min, 29.9P0.1, 40.4P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  ()
59.9 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (11 - 100, n=8, last 2 years)
57.4 fps -4%
1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing
Average of class Gaming
  (25.7 - 127, n=13, last 2 years)
68.6 fps +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
68.3 (19.2min, 29.1P0.1, 43.2P1) fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (66.1 - 68.3, n=2)
67.2 fps +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.1 (22.5min, 32.9P0.1, 42.2P1) fps
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands
1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming
  (9.7 - 189.4, n=59, last 2 years)
109 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (100.7 - 110.5, n=4)
104.6 fps 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104.3 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103 fps -1%
3840x2160 Badass Preset (DX12)
Average of class Gaming
  (6.6 - 73.7, n=33, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (40.1 - 43.9, n=2)
42 fps +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40.1 fps
Guardians of the Galaxy
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155 (87min) fps +38%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (112 - 155, n=3)
139.7 fps +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112 (74min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (42 - 163, n=14, last 2 years)
111.5 fps 0%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
75 (20min) fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (60 - 75, n=2)
67.5 fps +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (42 - 96, n=4, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60 (45min) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (72min) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (82 - 104, n=2)
93 fps +13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
82 (52min) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (37 - 128, n=10, last 2 years)
73.8 fps -10%
Alan Wake Remastered
3840x2160 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89 (40.7min, 52P0.1, 72.3P1) fps +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (71.6 - 89, n=2)
80.3 fps +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
71.6 (21.9min, 39.4P0.1, 48.8P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (last 2 years)
71.6 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155 (49.6min, 56P0.1, 120P1) fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (118.8 - 155, n=2)
136.9 fps +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118.8 (31.4min, 50P0.1, 97.7P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (95.3 - 144.9, n=6, last 2 years)
118.3 fps 0%
Dying Light 2
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 83.9, n=21, last 2 years)
42.2 fps +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38.8 (22.1min, 25.7P0.1, 30.7P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33.4 - 42.3, n=5)
38.5 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
33.4 (23.3min, 24.3P0.1, 27.8P1) fps -14%
3840x2160 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (20.8 - 62, n=9, last 2 years)
43.4 fps +40%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
31 (24.4min, 26P0.1, 27.8P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (27.3 - 31, n=2)
29.2 fps -6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27.3 (15.7min, 18.5P0.1, 24.9P1) fps -12%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (35.8 - 174, n=25, last 2 years)
84.5 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 88.4, n=5)
80.5 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
77.6 (65.2min, 69.1P0.1, 71.6P1) fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69.2 (52min, 58.4P0.1, 62.9P1) fps -11%

To evaluate whether the frame rates remain fairly constant over a longer time period, we let the game "The Witcher 3" run for about 60 minutes in Full-HD resolution and maximum quality settings, without moving the gaming character. We did not notice a drop in the frame rates.

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø111.3 (107-116)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø87.2 (70-92)
MSI GE76 Raider i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø122.2 (107-127)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.9 (95-119)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Leise: Ø60 (59-61)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; Turbo: Ø117.9 (98-124)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU; sep. GPU, 25W: Ø124.6 (120-128)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø91.2 (87-96)
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test (Turbo)
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test (Turbo)
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test (Silent)
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test (Silent)
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test (sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25W)
GPU measurements during the Witcher 3 test (sep. GPU, dyn. boost 25W)
low med. high ultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 180.4 175.4 158.9 101.5 92.2 101.5
The Witcher 3 (2015) 345 298 197.9 111.1 80.5
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 133.8 122.2 114.8 111.3 89.2
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 177.8 138.7 108 84.6 51.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 112.9 95.1 78.2 66.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 146 124 120 111 104 60
Strange Brigade (2018) 359 229 198.8 182.4 140.2 84.5
F1 2021 (2021) 330 275 225 130.2 102.5 60
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) 142.4 123.4 118.8 114.4 71.6
Far Cry 6 (2021) 116.2 100.3 90.9 71.3 75.2 46.2
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) 118 113 112 112 103 60
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) 243 207 202 169 113 57
Dying Light 2 (2022) 106.9 88.4 77.6 55.8 31
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 136.3 119.6 98.3 99.1 53.7 25.2
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) 148.1 146.8 143.8 143.3 110.6 59.9
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) 192.7 167.3 128.9 104.3 73.5 40.1

Emissions - Asus ROG 16 with acceptable noise and heat development

Noise Emissions

During everyday operation with office and Internet tasks, the two fans take it easy, producing only very little noise. At times, they even remain turned off. On the other hand, under full load they get loud with a maximum noise level of 50 dB(A) during the stress test and 48 dB(A) during the Witcher 3 test. While the noise development can be reduced by selecting the "Silent" profile, this happens at the cost of computing performance.

Noise Level

Idle
26 / 27 / 29 dB(A)
Load
41 / 50 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 26 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.93937.738.846.12536.438.741.73740.33147.645.447.14148.44032.634.533.331.235.35040.229.334.726.541.56329.930.231.427.236.88022.823.921.521.830.910021.818.71818.225.41252419.118.620.325.616024.821.320.618.427.720025.92422.721.731.325027.325.824.324.132.131528.723.521.820.630.940026.421.815.314.436.550029.120.317.716.535.363029.51915.115.736.580032.919.41313.840.4100031.918.212.713.439.2125032.117.11212.740.4160030.315.311.91338.4200029.614.21213.338.3250027.516.112.413.437.331502713.81313.537.2400031.713.912.913.339.5500027.713.913.813.639.3630022.714.314.513.83580002013.813.813.431.21000017.613.41412.826.91250019.313.716.713.123.2160002314.516.413.320.2SPL41.42926.726.549.9N3.71.20.90.87.1median 27.3median 17.1median 14.5median 13.6median 35.3Delta3.53.23.11.85.4hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise
10%
4%
-11%
-8%
-9%
off / environment *
26
24.2
7%
26
-0%
26
-0%
26
-0%
25
4%
Idle Minimum *
26
24.2
7%
26
-0%
26
-0%
27
-4%
30
-15%
Idle Average *
27
24.2
10%
27
-0%
27
-0%
29
-7%
32
-19%
Idle Maximum *
29
24.2
17%
29
-0%
40
-38%
34
-17%
33
-14%
Load Average *
41
42.9
-5%
37
10%
50
-22%
48
-17%
45
-10%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48
39.5
18%
44
8%
53
-10%
51
-6%
50
-4%
Load Maximum *
50
42.9
14%
45
10%
53
-6%
53
-6%
52
-4%

* ... smaller is better

Temperatures

During everyday operation (office, Internet), the case temperatures remain within the green range. Under load (stress test, Witcher 3 test), the laptop warms up without becoming excessively hot. The CPU temperatures range within acceptable levels.

The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
The Witcher 3
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Stress test
Max. Load
 35 °C
95 F
36 °C
97 F
35 °C
95 F
 
 44 °C
111 F
45 °C
113 F
39 °C
102 F
 
 41 °C
106 F
40 °C
104 F
38 °C
100 F
 
Maximum: 45 °C = 113 F
Average: 39.2 °C = 103 F
50 °C
122 F
50 °C
122 F
46 °C
115 F
45 °C
113 F
46 °C
115 F
44 °C
111 F
43 °C
109 F
44 °C
111 F
42 °C
108 F
Maximum: 50 °C = 122 F
Average: 45.6 °C = 114 F
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C = 117 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 40.1 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.8 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
20%
-12%
-1%
-13%
-5%
Maximum Upper Side *
45
42.3
6%
53
-18%
43
4%
55
-22%
49
-9%
Maximum Bottom *
50
41.7
17%
53
-6%
47
6%
62
-24%
55
-10%
Idle Upper Side *
33
23.9
28%
36
-9%
33
-0%
32
3%
33
-0%
Idle Bottom *
33
23.9
28%
38
-15%
37
-12%
36
-9%
33
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Stress Test

In the beginning of the stress test with Prime95 and Furmark running for at least one hour, the CPU (4 to 4.1 GHz) and GPU (1,000 to 1,600 MHz) run at high clock speeds. Continuing, the values drop to between 3 and 3.1 GHz (CPU) and between 850 and 900 MHz (GPU). The stress test represents an extreme scenario, and we use this test to evaluate whether the system remains stable under full load.

Speakers

The stereo speakers produce a decent sound, although it could use more bass. For a better sound experience, using headphones or external speakers is recommended.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.238.840.2253837383146.64146.64029.631.229.65028.926.528.96332.827.232.88032.721.832.710043.118.243.112553.520.353.516056.918.456.920061.321.761.325069.324.169.331570.420.670.440069.114.469.15007216.57263074.715.774.780072.413.872.410007013.470125070.112.770.1160072137220006813.368250065.213.465.2315064.313.564.3400056.413.356.4500057.313.657.3630051.313.851.3800057.813.457.8100005712.8571250052.613.152.61600049.413.349.4SPL80.326.580.3N47.90.847.9median 64.3median 13.6median 64.3Delta8.11.88.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAsus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 39% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Power Management - The Zephyrus Duo offers a good battery life

Power Consumption

During idle operation, the GX650 has a slightly higher power consumption than most other Windows competitors. However, none of the other competitors can reach the low values of the MacBook Pro 16. The stress test or Witcher-3 test lead to an increase of the Zephyrus consumption up to a maximum of 256 watts or 186.5 watts on average, which are normal values for the hardware used here. While the power consumption remains constant during the Witcher 3 test, it drops slightly during the course of the stress test. Rated at 280 watts, the included power supply is sized sufficiently large.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 19 / 24 / 31 Watt
Load midlight 104 / 256 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
42%
16%
4%
9%
-15%
11%
Idle Minimum *
19
5.4
72%
17
11%
12
37%
12
37%
26
-37%
Idle Average *
24
16.4
32%
19
21%
17
29%
16
33%
30
-25%
Idle Maximum *
31
16.7
46%
25
19%
28
10%
22
29%
37
-19%
Load Average *
104
94
10%
108
-4%
118
-13%
118
-13%
127
-22%
Witcher 3 ultra *
186.5
104
44%
150
20%
252
-35%
223
-20%
176
6%
Load Maximum *
256
135
47%
179
30%
272
-6%
290
-13%
236
8%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø186.5 (182.4-193.3)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø202 (151.3-250)

Power Consumption With External Monitor

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø130.5 (128-133.6)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø129.5 (127.8-130.9)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø166.2 (157.9-172.1)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø174.7 (170-184)

Battery Life

In the WLAN test where websites are loaded via script and in the video test running the short movie Big Buck Bunny (H.264-coding, FHD) in a constant loop, the 16-inch laptop lasts for 7:49 hours and 9:19 hours respectively. During both tests, the power saving functions of the laptop are deactivated and the display brightness adjusted to about 150 cd/m². While running the video test, the communication modules are also turned off.

The battery offers a capacity of 90 Wh.
The battery offers a capacity of 90 Wh.
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
12h 29min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 101)
7h 49min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
9h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 02min
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 91.2 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
59%
-3%
-35%
10%
-3%
-11%
Reader / Idle
749
484
-35%
463
-38%
533
-29%
H.264
559
1021
83%
356
-36%
386
-31%
452
-19%
WiFi v1.3
469
894
91%
293
-38%
306
-35%
341
-27%
381
-19%
Load
62
63
2%
122
97%
145
134%
96
55%

Pros

+ matte 4k display in the 16:10 format
+ good color reproduction (Pantone certification)
+ high color space coverage
+ Dolby Vision/HDR
+ FreeSync and G-Sync (the latter via USB-C)
+ high system performance
+ overclocking options
+ robust metal case
+ 2 PCIe 4 SSDs (Raid 0)
+ a lot of storage space (4 TB)
+ fast storage card reader
+ excellent WLAN transfer rates
+ very good battery life
+ Power Delivery

Cons

- no Thunderbolt 4 or USB 4
- larger and heavier than comparable devices

Verdict - A powerful laptop for the creative segment

The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, provided by Asus Germany
The ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, provided by Asus Germany

Asus advertises the Zephyrus primarily as a gaming laptop, but the concept of the laptop is also targeted toward content creators: Video and image processing, rendering and of course also gaming are the core disciplines. 4k gaming is possible in high to maximum settings.

While the Screenpad Plus should offer a certain added value in some application scenarios, it also increases the weight, purchase price, and size of the laptop.

Ryzen 9 6900HX APU and GeForce RTX 3080-Ti Laptop GPU deliver the necessary computing performance, and both components run at a constant, high clock speed. Two PCIe 4 SSDs (RAID 0) ensure short load times and offer a lot of storage space (4 TB). The whole package is rounded by 64 GB of working memory.

The noise and heat development under load range at the usual level for this class of laptop. However, during everyday operation the laptop remains very quiet. The good 16-inch display in the 16:10 format scores with an excellent color reproduction (Pantone certification) and covers the DCI-P3 color space completely.

Despite the high computing performance, you don't have to live with a short battery life. One battery charge (90 Wh) lasts for a WLAN runtime of almost 8 hours. Another positive point is the ability to charge the battery using a universal USB-C charger (45 watts min.), since the left USB-C Gen 2 port also supports Power Delivery. This means that you don't necessarily have to bring along the hefty 280-Watt power supply.

An alternative to the Zephyrus would be Gigabyte Aero 16, which offers a higher CPU performance and a Thunderbolt 4 port. The disadvantages are a worse battery life, a reflective display, and more heat development. If you need a powerful computing performance and battery life that is as long as possible, you can hardly get around the Apple MacBook Pro 16. On the other hand, you then could neither replace or expand the SSD, nor the working memory. In addition, the MacBook also uses a reflective screen.

Price and Availability

While the ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX is already listed on Asus' US website at the time of this test, other online shops such as CDW ($4097) and B&H Photo ($4000) show it as not in stock yet.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX - 05/23/2022 v7
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
81%
Pointing Device
83%
Connectivity
70 / 80 → 88%
Weight
59 / 10-66 → 88%
Battery
80 / 95 → 84%
Display
89%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
97%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
81 / 90 → 90%
Audio
74%
Camera
41 / 85 → 48%
Average
78%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 4 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 review: An unusual gaming laptop with a good battery life
Sascha Mölck, 2022-05-24 (Update: 2023-01- 1)