Notebookcheck Logo

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 review: An unusual gaming laptop with a good battery life

Dynamic duo. A Ryzen 9 6900HX APU and GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU bring all the current games smoothly to the matte 4k screen (IPS, DCI P3, FreeSync) in the 16:10 format. They are accompanied by 4 TB of storage (RAID 0), 64 GB of working memory, and a surprisingly good battery life.

With the Zephyrus Duo 16, Asus presents a laptop for gamers, streamers, and content creators, whose most striking feature becomes immediately apparent: Placed above the keyboard is a second display including touchscreen functionality (Screenpad Plus). The competitors include devices such as the Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model, the Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5, the MSI GE76 Raider, the Medion Erazer Beast X30, and the Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021.

Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
Processor
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX 8 x 3.3 - 4.9 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 80 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt H (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1395 MHz, Memory: 2000 MHz, 165 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 30.0.15.1259, Optimus
Memory
65536 MB 
, DDR5-4800, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 3840 x 2400 pixel 283 PPI, BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS level, FreeSync Premium, Pantone Validated, (second screen: 14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, IPS level, capacitive, stylus support), glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Soundcard
Realtek ALC285
Connections
4 USB 3.1 Gen2, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combined audio port, Card Reader: MicroSD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 20.5 x 355 x 266 ( = 0.81 x 13.98 x 10.47 in)
Battery
90 Wh, 5845 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 4 cells
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 6 speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, palm rest, Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.56 kg ( = 90.3 oz / 5.64 pounds), Power Supply: 850 g ( = 29.98 oz / 1.87 pounds)
Price
4999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88.2 %
05/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
92.5 %
11/2021
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU
2.2 kg16.8 mm16.20"3456x2234
88.3 %
05/2022
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.5 %
01/2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.7 %
05/2022
Medion Erazer Beast X30
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg23 mm17.30"2560x1440
84.7 %
03/2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400

Case - GX650 with a robust metal case

The matte black metal case offers a good workmanship. There are no apparent gaps and no noticeable sharp edges. Another positive point is that the base unit cannot be warped. On the other hand, the lid could use a bit more stiffness. The hinges are able to hold the lid tightly in position. The maximum opening angle is about 130 degrees, and you can open the lid with one hand.

Once you open the display lid, the Screenpad, a second display with touchscreen functionality, is raised by a fixed angle of about 15 degrees towards the user. In addition, it is moved by about 2 cm (~0.8 in) toward the main screen. The resulting gap shows a transparent plastic plate that offers a glimpse into the insides of the case in some places. The raising of the Screenpad has not only ergonomic reasons, but there are also vent openings below the display to allow air flow into the case.

The Zephyrus is one of the heavier laptops in our comparison field. Only the MSI GE76 Raider is heavier. The dimensions also turn out slightly larger than comparable 16-inch laptops such as the MacBook Pro 16.

Size Comparison

397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 26 mm / 1.024 inch 3 kg6.65 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.2 kg4.94 lbs356 mm / 14 inch 248.5 mm / 9.78 inch 22.4 mm / 0.882 inch 2.3 kg5.05 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 266 mm / 10.5 inch 20.5 mm / 0.807 inch 2.6 kg5.64 lbs355.7 mm / 14 inch 248.1 mm / 9.77 inch 16.8 mm / 0.661 inch 2.2 kg4.85 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 235 mm / 9.25 inch 16.99 mm / 0.669 inch 2.1 kg4.61 lbs

Equipment - The Zephyrus does not offer Thunderbolt 4

All four USB connections (2x USB-A, 2x USB-C) support the USB 3.2 Gen 2 standard. One of the two USB-C ports offers Power Delivery, and both ports support DisplayPort via USB-C. With this, the laptop offers three video output ports together with the HDMI 2.1 connection. The connections are completed by a combined audio port and a Gigabit Ethernet port.

Left side: power, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery, G-Sync), storage card reader (MicroSD), audio combo
Left side: power, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort, Power Delivery, G-Sync), storage card reader (MicroSD), audio combo
Right side: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)
Right side: USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C; DisplayPort)
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI 2.1
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A), HDMI 2.1

SD Card Reader

The MicroSD storage card reader is one of the fast models with maximum transfer rates of 155 MB/s (transferring 250 jpg image files of about 5 MB each) and 185 MB/s (copying large data blocks) using our AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference storage card.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 222, n=95, last 2 years)
116.1 MB/s ∼75% -25%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79.9 MB/s ∼52% -48%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
66 MB/s ∼43% -57%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
185 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=88, last 2 years)
135.1 MB/s ∼73% -27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
83 MB/s ∼45% -55%

Communication

The WLAN transfer rates determined under optimal conditions (with no additional WLAN devices nearby and the laptop and server PC in close proximity) turn out excellent and correspond to the capabilities of the WiFi chip (Mediatek MT7922; 802.11 ax, WiFi 6E). Wired network connections are handled by a Gigabit Ethernet chip (RTL8125) from Realtek.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1695 (1556min - 1768max) MBit/s ∼100%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1621 (1412min - 1672max) MBit/s ∼96% -4%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (1492 - 1695, n=3)
1568 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1503 (1451min - 1558max) MBit/s ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (851 - 1695, n=16, last 2 years)
1451 MBit/s ∼86% -14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1333 (1044min - 1390max) MBit/s ∼79% -21%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz
1727 (866min - 1759max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1721 (1500min - 1744max) MBit/s ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1692 (1567min - 1738max) MBit/s ∼98%
Average MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
  (1553 - 1692, n=3)
1617 MBit/s ∼94% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (787 - 1748, n=20, last 2 years)
1581 MBit/s ∼92% -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1030 (752min - 1313max) MBit/s ∼60% -39%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1691 (1567-1738)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1697 (866-1759)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1721 (1500-1744)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1029 (752-1313)
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (588-1235)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1695 (1556-1768)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1621 (1412-1672)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1503 (1451-1558)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1333 (1044-1390)
MSI GE76 Raider Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1235 (650-1337)

Webcam

The 0.9 MP webcam of the Zephyrus produces images with a maximum resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. It lacks color accuracy, and the colors deviate significantly from the target. The camera does not possess a mechanical cover.

ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
18.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
15.3 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
25.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
18.5 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
4 ∆E
ColorChecker Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX: 15.96 ∆E min: 2.53 - max: 27.32 ∆E

Accessories

In addition to the usual documentation (quick start manual and warranty information), the laptop also includes a rubber palm rest.

Maintenance

To take off the bottom of the case, you first have to remove the screws at the bottom. But you need to pay attention, since one of the screws in the middle of the case is covered by a little rubber plate. The back of the case is also kept in place by some clips that can be loosened by some careful wiggling or with the help of a flat prying tool. After removing the case bottom, you get access to the working memory banks (both occupied), the two SSDs (PCIe 4), the fans, and the battery.

Insides of the GX650RX
Insides of the GX650RX

Warranty

Asus offers a 2-year warranty on the Zephyrus. A warranty extension to 3 years will cost an extra 129 Euros (~$136).

Input Devices - A second display for the Asus laptop

Keyboard

The keyboard only allows for comfortable typing if you use the included palm rest made from rubber (depth: ~5.5 cm, 2.2 in, angled). While it does a fairly good job, it really only works on a fixed surface. The smooth keys of the illuminated chiclet keyboard have a short stroke and clear pressure point. The key resistance is okay, and the keyboard doesn't bend while typing. The three-step RGB illumination is controlled via a function key. Overall, Asus delivers a keyboard here that is suitable for everyday tasks.

Touchpad

A multitouch-capable Clickpad (~5.8 x 9.6 cm, ~2.3 x 3.8 in) in portrait orientation serves as the mouse replacement. Its smooth surface facilitates sliding of the fingers. The pad has a short stroke and clear pressure point. Tapping the corresponding symbol on the pad will display a number pad.

Zephyrus Duo input devices
Zephyrus Duo input devices

Asus Screenpad Plus

There is an additional input option in form of the Screenpad Plus (14 in, 3840 x 1100 pixels, matte), which is a second display that includes touchscreen functionality (support for active input pens). It behaves like any other plugged-in external display and can be turned on and off via separate key.

The Screenpad gives the option to move applications or their navigation elements to the touchscreen. The latter depends on whether the application supports this. For example, we are able to move the chat window to the Screenpad, while a game is running on the main screen.

There are several small apps preinstalled that give an impression of the possibilities of the Screenpad. For example, there is a calculator and a field for handwriting input, and a Quick Key application bundles often used functions such as cut, copy, and paste.

Display - Good color reproduction

The brightness (433.9 cd/m²) and contrast (1043:1) of the matte 16-inch display (3840 x 2400 pixels) fulfill the requirements. Positive points are the fast response times and lack of PWM flickering.

The display supports AMD's FreeSync technology, which dynamically adjusts the refresh rates of the display and frame rates of the GPU to each other. In this way, the created image is supposed to be as smooth as possible, particularly during computer games.

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
Light halos
Light halos
464
cd/m²
431
cd/m²
430
cd/m²
426
cd/m²
459
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
442
cd/m²
432
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE160QAM-NX1
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 464 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 433.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 459 cd/m²
Contrast: 1043:1 (Black: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.97 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 1.03
ΔE Greyscale 4.9 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
86.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.235
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.20
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.60
MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X30
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16.00
Display
-23%
-22%
-18%
Display P3 Coverage
98
65.3
-33%
63.1
-36%
67.7
-31%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
85.1
-15%
94
-6%
97.6
-2%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.3
67.4
-22%
65.2
-24%
69.2
-20%
Response Times
-9%
-5%
-26%
74%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
4.3 ?(2.4, 1.9)
71%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
62%
14.7 ?(7, 7.7)
-1%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
84%
Response Time Black / White *
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
10.5 ?(5.7, 4.8)
-88%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
-71%
8.4 ?(3.2, 5.2)
-50%
2 ?(1, 1)
64%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(58)
Screen
329%
27%
20%
3%
456%
Brightness middle
459
507
10%
330
-28%
290
-37%
377
-18%
368
-20%
Brightness
434
494
14%
315
-27%
290
-33%
352
-19%
368
-15%
Brightness Distribution
88
96
9%
89
1%
96
9%
86
-2%
93
6%
Black Level *
0.44
0.02
95%
0.24
45%
0.23
48%
0.32
27%
0.01
98%
Contrast
1043
25350
2330%
1375
32%
1261
21%
1178
13%
36800
3428%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.97
1.4
53%
1.47
51%
1.59
46%
2.91
2%
2.33
22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.13
2.8
66%
2.73
66%
3.17
61%
6.78
17%
4.34
47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.03
0.63
39%
0.87
16%
1.3
-26%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
4.9
2.3
53%
1.8
63%
2.5
49%
3.4
31%
0.8
84%
Gamma
2.235 98%
2.27 97%
2.282 96%
2.253 98%
2.109 104%
2.119 104%
CCT
6775 96%
6792 96%
6499 100%
6640 98%
7273 89%
6569 99%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
329% / 329%
-2% / 11%
-2% / 8%
-14% / -6%
265% / 380%

* ... smaller is better

The X Rite Pantone certification of the display ensures a very natural color reproduction. Correspondingly, the color display is fairly accurate already in the state of delivery. While the color deviation remains within the target limits, a calibration still brings significant improvements. The screen is able to display the sRGB (99.9%) and DCI-P3 (98%) color spaces almost completely, and 86% of the AdobeRGB color space are also covered.

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs sRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs sRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs AdobeRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs AdobeRGB
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs P3
ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2 ms rise
↘ 3.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.7 ms rise
↘ 7.9 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21792 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The viewing angles of the IPS panel are stable, and it can be read from any angle. The display can be read outdoors, if the sunlight isn't too bright.

The Zephyrus outdoors
The Zephyrus outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - Rembrandt meets Ampere

With the Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX, Asus offers a 16-inch laptop that is primarily positioned as a gaming laptop. However, the device is also targeted towards streamers and content creators.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z
Nvidia System Info
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWInfo
HWInfo
 

Test Conditions

The laptop offers three manufacturer specific performance profiles ("Silent", "Performance", and "Turbo"), and you can switch between them by using the "Fn" + "F5" key combination. The "Turbo" profile can only be used in mains operation. Our battery tests were performed using the "Silent" profile and all the benchmarks with the "Performance" profile activated.

Performance Turbo Silent
Power Limit 1 80 Watt 100 Watt 70 Watt
Power Limit 2 80 Watt 125 Watt 70 Watt

The preinstalled Armoury Crate software allows you to create individual profiles ("Manual"). For example, we configured the power limits of the CPU and the dynamic boost of the GPU individually. You can also overclock the graphics storage.

 
 

Processor

The CPU segment of the Ryzen 9 6900HX APU (Rembrandt) consists of an octa-core processor that runs at a basic clock speed of 3.3 GHz. The speed can be increased up to 4.9 GHz via Turbo. Simultaneous multithreading (two threads per core) is supported.

The multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark briefly runs at clock speeds between 4 and 4.4 GHz, and the single-thread test between 3.1 and 4.7 GHz. In battery operation, the CPU runs at 3 to 4.1 GHz (multithread) and 2 to 4.7 GHz (single-thread).

Multithread (mains operation)
Multithread (mains operation)
Single-thread (mains operation)
Single-thread (mains operation)

We evaluate whether the CPU Turbo is used constantly in mains operation by running the multithread test of the Cinebench R15 benchmark for at least 30 minutes in a constant loop. The Turbo is used at a high level. By using the "Turbo" performance profile, the clock speed can be increased still slightly higher.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø1535 (1448.91-1565.5)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
Medion Erazer Beast X30 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2761 (2697.24-2854.49)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Leise: Ø2069 (2039.36-2194.43)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX; Turbo: Ø2369 (2355.85-2411.64)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Turbo)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Silent)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop (Silent)
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2292 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
158.6 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Help
CPU Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
83.9 pt ∼84%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
82 pt ∼82%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
76.5 pt ∼77%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
71.1 pt ∼71%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
68.8 pt ∼69%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
68.7 pt ∼69%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
67.6 pt ∼68%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max -5!
Apple M1 Max
65.2 pt ∼65%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
60.6 pt ∼61%
Average of class Gaming
 
56.2 pt ∼56%
Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18935 Points ∼100% +34%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points ∼97% +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points ∼96% +29%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
15100 Points ∼80% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (13966 - 15100, n=4)
14318 Points ∼76% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points ∼74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
13966 Points ∼74% -1%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12385 Points ∼65% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 22456, n=174, last 2 years)
12352 Points ∼65% -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9777 Points ∼52% -31%
Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points ∼100% +24%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points ∼98% +22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1799 Points ∼93% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1659 Points ∼86% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
1576 Points ∼81% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
1570 Points ∼81% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points ∼81%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1529 - 1576, n=4)
1560 Points ∼80% 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1530 Points ∼79% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1920, n=173, last 2 years)
1492 Points ∼77% -5%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
7203 Points ∼100% +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points ∼96% +26%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points ∼95% +25%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
5813 Points ∼81% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5403 - 5813, n=4)
5542 Points ∼77% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
5403 Points ∼75% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 8564, n=229, last 2 years)
4427 Points ∼61% -19%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
3741 Points ∼52% -32%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
2735 Points ∼38% -50%
CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
695 Points ∼95% +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points ∼93% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
612 Points ∼83% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
610 Points ∼83% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (595 - 612, n=4)
605 Points ∼82% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
596 Points ∼81% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 740, n=229, last 2 years)
554 Points ∼75% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
390 Points ∼53% -34%
Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points ∼100% +27%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2854 Points ∼98% +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points ∼96% +21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
2411 Points ∼83% +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (2194 - 2411, n=4)
2296 Points ∼79% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points ∼79%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
2194 Points ∼75% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3383, n=238, last 2 years)
1866 Points ∼64% -19%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)
1693 (1667min - 1693max) Points ∼58% -26%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1566 (1448.91min - 1565.5max) Points ∼54% -32%
CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points ∼100% +12%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points ∼99% +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
253 Points ∼91% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points ∼89%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
249 Points ∼89% 0%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (245 - 253, n=4)
249 Points ∼89% 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
242 Points ∼87% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
240 Points ∼86% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 277, n=228, last 2 years)
222 Points ∼80% -11%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Rosetta 2)
197 Points ∼71% -21%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
306 Seconds * ∼100% -39%
Average of class Gaming
  (153.1 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
295 Seconds * ∼96% -34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
242 Seconds * ∼79% -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (212 - 242, n=5)
223 Seconds * ∼73% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * ∼72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
212 Seconds * ∼69% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * ∼65% +9%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max (Blender 3.0 beta for mac)
189 Seconds * ∼62% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * ∼59% +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
175.8 Seconds * ∼57% +20%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
73485 MIPS ∼100% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS ∼99% +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS ∼93% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
65336 MIPS ∼89% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS ∼88%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (62123 - 65336, n=4)
63906 MIPS ∼87% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
63706 MIPS ∼87% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 83533, n=228, last 2 years)
49989 MIPS ∼68% -22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
44553 MIPS ∼61% -31%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS ∼100% +8%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS ∼99% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
5920 MIPS ∼96% +3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5892 MIPS ∼95% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (5727 - 5920, n=4)
5825 MIPS ∼94% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
5813 MIPS ∼94% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS ∼93%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=228, last 2 years)
5415 MIPS ∼88% -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5257 MIPS ∼85% -8%
Geekbench 5.3
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points ∼100% +36%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points ∼98% +34%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12708 Points ∼92% +25%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
12559 Points ∼91% +24%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
10490 Points ∼76% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points ∼73%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (9647 - 10490, n=4)
10094 Points ∼73% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
10071 Points ∼73% -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
9607 Points ∼69% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 14294, n=221, last 2 years)
8461 Points ∼61% -17%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points ∼100% +20%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points ∼97% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1842 Points ∼96% +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1782 Points ∼93% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
1604 Points ∼84% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1596 Points ∼83% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points ∼83%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (1523 - 1604, n=4)
1570 Points ∼82% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
1523 Points ∼79% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1933, n=221, last 2 years)
1452 Points ∼76% -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
20.5 fps ∼100% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps ∼97% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
18.7 fps ∼91% +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps ∼88% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps ∼88%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (17.6 - 18.7, n=4)
18 fps ∼88% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
17.6 fps ∼86% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 24.9, n=230, last 2 years)
13.9 fps ∼68% -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
11.7 fps ∼57% -35%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 332, n=226, last 2 years)
53.2 s * ∼100% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
49.5 s * ∼93% -10%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (44.8 - 50.1, n=4)
46.3 s * ∼87% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
45.2 s * ∼85% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * ∼85%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
44.8 s * ∼84% -0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
42.9 s * ∼81% +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * ∼73% +13%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * ∼73% +14%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=226, last 2 years)
0.564 sec * ∼100% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4936 sec * ∼88% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Leise)
0.4808 sec * ∼85% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * ∼85%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (0.4742 - 0.4808, n=4)
0.4787 sec * ∼85% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (Turbo)
0.4742 sec * ∼84% +1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4522 sec * ∼80% +6%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * ∼75% +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * ∼74% +13%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.2 pt ∼95%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
 
91.6 pt ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.5 pt ∼92%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
90 pt ∼90%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70.7 pt ∼71%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
70.7 pt ∼71%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.5 pt ∼67%
Average of class Gaming
 
64.7 pt ∼65%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
51 pt ∼51%
AIDA64
FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
17963 KRay/s ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
16852 KRay/s ∼94%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (16192 - 17963, n=4)
16847 KRay/s ∼94% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
16192 KRay/s ∼90% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=183, last 2 years)
11310 KRay/s ∼63% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9405 KRay/s ∼52% -44%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9065 KRay/s ∼50% -46%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
8265 KRay/s ∼46% -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5839 KRay/s ∼33% -65%
FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
110797 Points ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (101849 - 110797, n=4)
104690 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
103794 Points ∼94%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
101849 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=183, last 2 years)
61289 Points ∼55% -41%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
42843 Points ∼39% -59%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40570 Points ∼37% -61%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
38277 Points ∼35% -63%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
27801 Points ∼25% -73%
CPU SHA3
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
3804 MB/s ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (3480 - 3804, n=4)
3583 MB/s ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3547 MB/s ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
3480 MB/s ∼91% -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3354 MB/s ∼88% -5%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3178 MB/s ∼84% -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
2931 MB/s ∼77% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 4851, n=183, last 2 years)
2851 MB/s ∼75% -20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
2013 MB/s ∼53% -43%
CPU Queen
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
107042 Points ∼100% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
107007 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106414 Points ∼99% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
106369 Points ∼99% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
104920 Points ∼98%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (102463 - 107007, n=4)
104760 Points ∼98% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
104649 Points ∼98% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=183, last 2 years)
89359 Points ∼83% -15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
85965 Points ∼80% -18%
FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
13062 Points ∼100% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (12861 - 13062, n=4)
12959 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
12957 Points ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
12955 Points ∼99%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10237 Points ∼78% -21%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
10226 Points ∼78% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=183, last 2 years)
9892 Points ∼76% -24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9655 Points ∼74% -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
7027 Points ∼54% -46%
FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
61370 Points ∼100% +7%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (56121 - 61370, n=4)
57821 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points ∼93%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
56121 Points ∼91% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=183, last 2 years)
33433 Points ∼54% -42%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
26859 Points ∼44% -53%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
24693 Points ∼40% -57%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
22873 Points ∼37% -60%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
15765 Points ∼26% -73%
CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
140776 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (137667 - 140776, n=4)
139475 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
139407 MB/s ∼99%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
137667 MB/s ∼98% -1%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
100062 MB/s ∼71% -28%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
91041 MB/s ∼65% -35%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 166300, n=183, last 2 years)
77534 MB/s ∼55% -44%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
67814 MB/s ∼48% -51%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65871 MB/s ∼47% -53%
CPU ZLib
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1174 MB/s ∼100% +32%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
1085 MB/s ∼92% +22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
988 MB/s ∼84% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
911 MB/s ∼78% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
890 MB/s ∼76%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (863 - 911, n=4)
886 MB/s ∼75% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
863 MB/s ∼74% -3%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
701 MB/s ∼60% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1351, n=204, last 2 years)
694 MB/s ∼59% -22%
FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
9540 KRay/s ∼100% +6%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (8748 - 9540, n=4)
9012 KRay/s ∼94% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
9001 KRay/s ∼94%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
8759 KRay/s ∼92% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=183, last 2 years)
6138 KRay/s ∼64% -32%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5596 KRay/s ∼59% -38%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
5239 KRay/s ∼55% -42%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
4776 KRay/s ∼50% -47%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
3257 KRay/s ∼34% -64%
CPU PhotoWorxx
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40095 MPixel/s ∼100% +35%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
40000 MPixel/s ∼100% +35%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
39666 MPixel/s ∼99% +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
38990 MPixel/s ∼97% +31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Turbo)
29975 MPixel/s ∼75% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800, Leise)
29894 MPixel/s ∼75% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
29705 MPixel/s ∼74%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (28094 - 29975, n=4)
29417 MPixel/s ∼73% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=183, last 2 years)
24707 MPixel/s ∼62% -17%

System Performance

The smoothly running system offers sufficient performance for gaming, video editing, and rendering for the next few years. The transfer rates of the built-in working memory remain beneath the values of comparable laptops that are equipped with DDR5-4800 storage. This is accompanied by very good PC-Mark results.

The working memory runs in dual-channel mode.
The working memory runs in dual-channel mode.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
4418 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
5798 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4622 points
PCMark 10 Score
6351 points
Help
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points ∼100% +26%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points ∼98% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7313 Points ∼91% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7149 Points ∼89% +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=188, last 2 years)
6551 Points ∼82% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points ∼79%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points ∼98% +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10597 Points ∼97% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9870 Points ∼90% +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=187, last 2 years)
9858 Points ∼90% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points ∼86%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points ∼100% +31%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points ∼100% +30%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9675 Points ∼96% +26%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9173 Points ∼91% +19%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=187, last 2 years)
8749 Points ∼87% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points ∼76%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points ∼100% +34%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points ∼91% +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10951 Points ∼85% +14%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10351 Points ∼80% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points ∼75%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=187, last 2 years)
8969 Points ∼70% -7%
CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points ∼100% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1768 Points ∼84% +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2108, n=33, last 2 years)
1748 Points ∼83% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1727 Points ∼82% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points ∼81%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1586 Points ∼75% -7%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points ∼100% +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1719 Points ∼85% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points ∼84%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=33, last 2 years)
1697 Points ∼84% 0%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1585 Points ∼78% -7%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1361 Points ∼67% -20%
CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points ∼100% +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
2102 Points ∼97% +22%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1985 Points ∼92% +15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1868 Points ∼86% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2165, n=33, last 2 years)
1831 Points ∼85% +6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points ∼80%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points ∼100% +30%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=33, last 2 years)
1679 Points ∼75% -2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1633 Points ∼73% -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1471 Points ∼66% -14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1080 Points ∼48% -37%
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62554 MB/s ∼100% +18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
62419 MB/s ∼100% +17%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61946 MB/s ∼99% +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61605 MB/s ∼98% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s ∼85%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (48427 - 53345, n=4)
52043 MB/s ∼83% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=183, last 2 years)
43345 MB/s ∼69% -18%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65865 MB/s ∼100% +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65835 MB/s ∼100% +23%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65452 MB/s ∼99% +23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65277 MB/s ∼99% +22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
53321 MB/s ∼81%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (50457 - 53321, n=4)
52476 MB/s ∼80% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=183, last 2 years)
47110 MB/s ∼72% -12%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65772 MB/s ∼100% +15%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
65159 MB/s ∼99% +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
64282 MB/s ∼98% +12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
61981 MB/s ∼94% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
57180 MB/s ∼87%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (54912 - 57202, n=4)
56374 MB/s ∼86% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=183, last 2 years)
45228 MB/s ∼69% -21%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
95.2 ns * ∼100% -3%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
92.6 ns * ∼97% -0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
92.3 ns * ∼97%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
89.7 ns * ∼94% +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
  (83.4 - 92.3, n=4)
86.1 ns * ∼90% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (0 - 122, n=206, last 2 years)
60.6 ns * ∼64% +34%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU (v6.50.5800)
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

The standardized Latency Monitor test (web surfing, 4k video reproduction, Prime95 high load) revealed some conspicuous delays in the DPC latencies. The system doesn't appear to be suited for real-time video and audio processing. However, future software updates might lead to some improvements or even make things worse.

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model Early 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4836 μs * ∼100% -827%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * ∼34% -215%
Medion Erazer Beast X30
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
879.6 μs * ∼18% -69%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * ∼13% -19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * ∼11%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution