
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 laptop review - HP's new business flagship is a great total package
2.8K OLED at 120 Hz.
The EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 is HP's new business spearhead featuring a high-quality aluminum case. Its Lunar Lake processor delivers sufficient performance and its fans are barely audible during use, but what compromises do you have to make for its low weight of 1.2 kilograms?Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Verdict - The EliteBook Ultra is better with Intel
The Intel version of the EliteBook Ultra is significantly better than the Snapdragon version and it features a range of significant upgrades. Its case is lighter, there are more ports, a better webcam, a haptic touchpad and a much better screen. There are also no compatibility issues whatsoever. The Lunar Lake processor offers good performance overall and the two fans always remain super quiet, which is noticeable during everyday use. Its battery runtimes are a little weaker, but we are happy to accept this compromise in view of its better display.
The new EliteBook lineup is a bit confusing due to the new naming system and compared to the more traditional EliteBook X models, you'll have to do without some key travel as well as some business features like a SmartCard reader or LTE/5G modules. The new Lenovo ThinkPad X9 14 is probably the biggest rival for the EliteBook Ultra and we are already excited to see how the X9 14 will fare in our test (coming soon).
Pros
Cons
HP's EliteBook Ultra G1i is a lightweight 14-inch business laptop that represents the new spearhead of the lineup. Our test device (B66THAT) with an MRSP of $3,849 is equipped with a 2.8K OLED touchscreen at 120 Hz, the Intel Core Ultra 258V processor with 32 GB RAM and a 1-TB SSD.
Specifications
Case & connectivity
As with the Snapdragon model, HP has also gone for a dark blue aluminum case for the EliteBook Ultra G1i, but its dimensions are slightly different, with the Intel model coming in at around 150 grams less. Visually, the device makes quite an impression—only the two new EliteBook and PolyStudio letterings at the rear don't harmonize particularly well with the design in our eyes. Despite its dark surfaces, fingerprints weren't a major problem during our test. The case's build quality and stability are both very good. The hinges (max. 180 degrees) are a little too tight to open the lid comfortably with one hand, but there is still a visible bounce when you adjust its angle. The lower case cover can be easily removed, but maintenance work is limited to the fans, the battery and the M.2 2280 SSD.
From a connectivity standpoint, this laptop has some advantages over the Snapdragon model because, in addition to another USB-C port (which is why the device can be charged on both sides), it features a Kensington lock. Nevertheless, its regular USB-A port with a small flap is still useful during everyday use. Further upgrades have been made to its webcam (with a cover and an IR sensor for facial recognition), which now uses a 9 MP sensor and is of better quality. As a Copilot+ laptop, Windows Studio effects are of course also supported. Its WLAN module (Intel BE201) now supports Wi-Fi 7 including Bluetooth 5.4 and its transfer rates in conjunction with our reference router from Asus were very good. However, a WWAN module is not on board.
Networking | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |

Sustainability
Input devices - Large haptic touchpad
In general, the EliteBook Ultra uses HP's new keyboard design but in comparison to the EliteBook X models, there are no dedicated up/down keys—we can't quite comprehend this decision. The bigger compromise, however, concerns its key travel, which is very shallow. The keystrokes are still precise, but this comes at the cost of comfort and the keyboard is simply a little weaker overall than the EliteBook X models or even the comparable ThinkPads. Its backlighting can't be activated automatically.
The EliteBook Ultra G1i also comes with a large haptic touchpad (13.8 x 8.6 mm), which is nice and smooth and works very well overall. You can also use the device's capacitive touchscreen for inputs.
Display - 2.8K OLED at 120 Hz & VRR
HP has installed an OLED screen from Samsung with a 2.8K resolution (2,880 x 1,800 pixels, 16:10), a 120-Hz refresh rate, and VRR. Subjectively, its picture quality is great, with crisp colors and sharp-looking content—only on closer inspection can you see a slight grid effect (moiré effect) on bright surfaces. However, this isn't visible from a normal sitting distance and it isn't as pronounced as on some Lenovo laptops. We measured PWM flickering at 480 Hz and its response times are super fast, as expected. Neither brightness nor color temperature can be adjusted automatically, and its minimum brightness of 20 cd/m² is a little too high. Overall, however, it is still a big upgrade over the IPS panel in the Snapdragon model.
When it comes to brightness, the laptop's values of around 380 cd/m² in SDR mode and up to 600 cd/m² in HDR mode are in the usual range, but competitors such as the MateBook X Pro show that its brightness in particular could be significantly better. In our analysis using the professional CalMAN software, the panel performed well, especially for a business laptop. Even so, it is only suitable for image editing to a limited extent, as its color deviations are a bit too high and there is no sRGB profile, for example.
|
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 372 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.21
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 SDC41AA, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI LG Philips LGD07A1, IPS, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE ATNA40YK20-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 ATNA40CU09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 ATNA40CU07-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 IPS, 2240x1400, 14", 60 Hz | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 VisN236HUZ15, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -26% | -0% | -3% | -5% | -1% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 62.6 -37% | 99.5 0% | 99 -1% | 97 -3% | 99.8 0% | |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 93.2 -7% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98 | 64 -35% | 97.1 -1% | 89.2 -9% | 85.2 -13% | 94.6 -3% | |
Response Times | -5849% | -148% | 1% | -20% | -2719% | 76% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.74 ? | 55.8 ? -7441% | 2.4 ? -224% | 0.7 ? 5% | 0.83 ? -12% | 22.8 ? -2981% | 0.75 ? -1% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.7 ? | 30.5 ? -4257% | 1.9 ? -171% | 0.71 ? -1% | 0.69 ? 1% | 17.9 ? -2457% | 0.49 ? 30% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 240 ? -50% | 480 ? 0% | 240 -50% | 1440 200% | ||
Screen | -82% | -25% | 28% | 14% | -103% | 30% | |
Brightness middle | 392 | 442.8 13% | 407 4% | 374 -5% | 392 0% | 341.4 -13% | 613 56% |
Brightness | 378 | 412 9% | 410 8% | 379 0% | 398 5% | 315 -17% | 624 65% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 87 -8% | 99 4% | 98 3% | 97 2% | 87 -8% | 93 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.39 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 5.92 -147% | 4.9 -104% | 1 58% | 1.3 46% | 5.63 -135% | 1.9 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.6 | 10.46 -58% | 9.1 -38% | 2.2 67% | 3.2 52% | 11.94 -81% | 3.1 53% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.9 | 7.6 -300% | 2.3 -21% | 1.1 42% | 2.3 -21% | 8.8 -363% | 2.1 -11% |
Gamma | 2.21 100% | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.15 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.14 103% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6463 101% | 6728 97% | 6310 103% | 6549 99% | 6517 100% | 6034 108% | 6447 101% |
Contrast | 2013 | 875 | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.31 | 4.7 | 1.5 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1986% /
-1115% | -58% /
-49% | 9% /
13% | -4% /
1% | -1411% /
-757% | 35% /
34% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.7 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.39 ms rise | |
↘ 0.31 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.74 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4 ms rise | |
↘ 0.34 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 26 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8471 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance - Lunar Lake with 32 GB RAM
Testing conditions
HP doesn't offer its own energy profiles. We performed the following benchmarks and measurements using the Windows best performance mode.
Processor - Core Ultra 7 258V
HP has gone for the efficient Lunar Lake Core Ultra 7 258V processor, which consumes 37 watts for a short time and 18 watts permanently, which is why the laptop's multi-core performance doesn't remain stable (-35%). Its single-core performance is very good, but both the old Meteor Lake models and the latest chips from AMD and Qualcomm are faster when it comes to multi-core performance. In particular, the EliteBook X G1a 14 with the Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 375 is in a completely different league. This performance is sufficient for normal office work, but if you need more multi-core performance, there are better alternatives on the market. Its performance stays constant in battery mode.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 -2! |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (406 - 660, n=18) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107.8 - 123, n=12) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 173, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9114 - 11097, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1664 - 1947, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (3530 - 4314, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (643 - 749, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1504 - 1656, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (258 - 298, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=70, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (315 - 414, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (32198 - 36724, n=14) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (5265 - 5869, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=74, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9311 - 11334, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2593 - 2795, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (7717 - 9864, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (1891 - 2046, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (10.5 - 14.2, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (41.1 - 59.3, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (0.4457 - 0.4852, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (9215 - 12781, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (48758 - 63401, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (2271 - 2817, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (49510 - 49818, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4103 - 4440, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (25361 - 33565, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (37728 - 40753, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (499 - 632, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (4891 - 6930, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (51323 - 54971, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
System performance
During everyday use, the EliteBook Ultra is a very responsive laptop and its results in the synthetic benchmarks were also impressive. We noted no stability problems during our test. The Wolf security software is also included, but it is very invasive and checks every app and file before use, for example.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (6265 - 7314, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=57, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11331, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9295 - 11467, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (7357 - 9619, n=14) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10623, n=57, last 2 years) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (9333 - 10048, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1590 - 1742, n=13) | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1558 - 1684, n=13) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1727 - 1977, n=13) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (1251 - 1411, n=13) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=66, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (219 - 314, n=12) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (199.5 - 291, n=14) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=67, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V (468 - 559, n=14) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7162 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (107682 - 114336, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (82846 - 89417, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=68, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (109734 - 117935, n=14) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 7 258V (95 - 101.1, n=14) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI |
* ... smaller is better
Storage device
Our test device is equipped with a 1-TB version of the Kioxia XG8. The PCIe 4.0 SSD's performance is okay overall, but not completely stable under prolonged load.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
The integrated Intel Arc Graphics 140V graphics card delivers very good performance and you can even enjoy some games in your free time. Overall, the EliteBook Ultra was only just beaten by the EliteBook X with the Radeon 890M during our test, and its graphics performance (~9% drop in the Time Spy stress test) remained much more stable than its pure multi-core CPU performance. Further GPU benchmarks are available in our tech section.
3DMark 11 Performance | 11604 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8768 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4259 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3275 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 3261 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (509 - 700, n=21) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 1127, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140V (210 - 401, n=9) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (210 - 368, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE |
* ... smaller is better
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.48 - 31.4, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 149.8 | 133.4 | 50.6 | 25.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 92.1 | 99.3 | 75.1 | 70.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80.5 | 39.9 | 29.7 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 44 | 35.9 | 29.1 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 222 | 82.3 | 68.5 | 57.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.7 | 31.9 | 27.5 | 26 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 41.7 | 32.1 | 26.5 | 23.4 |
Emissions & energy
Noise emissions
HP also uses two fans inside the model with the efficient Lunar Lake processor, which makes itself known during everyday use. The EliteBook Ultra G1i is a very quiet laptop overall and in lots of cases, it's even silent. Even with a full CPU load, it takes around 20 seconds before the fans even start up. The maximum fan noise emissions are also very low at a maximum of 31.5 dB(A) and, once again, noticeably quieter than the Snapdragon model. There were no other electronic noises coming from our test device during our test.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.9 / 23.9 / 23.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 28.4 / 31.5 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Arc 140V, Core Ultra 7 258V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-80-100 | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SD X Elite X1E-78-100, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -8% | -1% | 3% | 1% | -21% | |
off / environment * | 23.9 | 24 -0% | 23.2 3% | 23.7 1% | 24 -0% | 23.4 2% | 24.8 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.9 | 24.4 -2% | 23.2 3% | 23.7 1% | 24 -0% | 23.4 2% | 24.8 -4% |
Idle Average * | 23.9 | 24.4 -2% | 23.2 3% | 23.7 1% | 24 -0% | 23.4 2% | 29.8 -25% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.9 | 24.5 -3% | 23.2 3% | 23.7 1% | 26.3 -10% | 24.3 -2% | 29.8 -25% |
Load Average * | 28.4 | 25.4 11% | 29.9 -5% | 30.5 -7% | 27.2 4% | 25 12% | 34 -20% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 31.5 | 39.3 -25% | 43.3 -37% | 31.1 1% | 27.2 14% | ||
Load Maximum * | 31.5 | 43.1 -37% | 40.5 -29% | 33.6 -7% | 27.2 14% | 34.8 -10% | 46.8 -49% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.6 | 39.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
The EliteBook's case stays very cool in idle mode and under low load, and there are no problems even under maximum load. Only a hotspot on the underside reached 44 °C during our test, but this was by no means critical. The keyboard remained significantly cooler during the stress test. As with pure CPU load, the SoC stabilized at around 18 watts after a few minutes during our stress test, and it stayed at this level.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.7 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.9 °C / 75 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (+4.3 °C / 7.8 F).
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, AMD Radeon 890M | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V, Intel Arc Graphics 140V | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 3% | -10% | -11% | -18% | -17% | -15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.9 | 36 5% | 42.3 -12% | 43.7 -15% | 47.9 -26% | 40.8 -8% | 43.2 -14% |
Maximum Bottom * | 44.3 | 34.2 23% | 40.1 9% | 46.9 -6% | 51.3 -16% | 40.4 9% | 42 5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.3 | 25 -7% | 27.3 -17% | 25.8 -11% | 26.7 -15% | 32.2 -38% | 29.3 -26% |
Idle Bottom * | 23.6 | 25.6 -8% | 28.3 -20% | 26.3 -11% | 26.9 -14% | 31.2 -32% | 29.7 -26% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
The laptop's speakers (PolyStudio) can get very loud and, apart from their somewhat weak bass coverage (which is often the case with thin devices), they deliver a good sound.
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 19% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 12% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (5.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Power consumption
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375, Radeon 890M, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, SK hynix PCB01 HFS001TFM9X179N GL, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 7 258V, Arc 140V, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 SD X Elite X1E-80-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, , OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 SD X Elite X1E-78-100, Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X101N BF, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00, OLED, 3120x2080, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -87% | -2% | -7% | -18% | 11% | -131% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 6.5 -76% | 4.7 -27% | 5.1 -38% | 5.4 -46% | 2.5 32% | 9.3 -151% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 8.7 -61% | 5.7 -6% | 6.2 -15% | 9.7 -80% | 5.7 -6% | 16 -196% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.7 | 10.3 -81% | 6.1 -7% | 6.9 -21% | 10.2 -79% | 5.8 -2% | 16.4 -188% |
Load Average * | 39.4 | 75.7 -92% | 29.8 24% | 38.7 2% | 28.9 27% | 24.2 39% | 67.3 -71% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 35.3 | 76.2 -116% | 35.3 -0% | 33.1 6% | 24.7 30% | 33.5 5% | |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 32.4 | 73.1 -126% | 34.1 -5% | 28.6 12% | 22 32% | 26.8 17% | |
Load Maximum * | 62.9 | 100.7 -60% | 60.1 4% | 60 5% | 68.2 -8% | 66.4 -6% | 94.3 -50% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 23.1 | 64.6 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
Runtimes
Notebookcheck total rating
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14
- 03/22/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Possible alternatives compared
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,026.06 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 in... 2. $2,129.20 HP EliteBook Ultra G1i 14 in... 3. $2,872.95 HP EliteBook X Flip G1i 14" ... List Price: 2349€ | 1.2 kg | 12.1 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
HP EliteBook X G1a 14 AI AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $2,530.35 List Price: 2200 USD | 1.5 kg | 13.2 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 21NS0010GE Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $2,019.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 2. $2,499.00 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... 3. $2,545.97 Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Ge... List Price: 2700 Euro | 982 g | 16 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Intel Core Ultra 7 258V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140V ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $969.00 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED 2024 Bu... 2. $974.00 ASUS Zenbook 14 OLED Laptop,... 3. $569.50 Asus ZenBook 14 Pro oled Q41... List Price: 1999€ | 1.2 kg | 13 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book4 Edge 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-80-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $702.33 List Price: 1569€ | 1.2 kg | 10.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
HP EliteBook Ultra G1q 14 Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite X1E-78-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $719.99 List Price: 1700 USD | 1.3 kg | 11.2 mm | 14.00" 2240x1400 189 PPI IPS | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2024 Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $32.99 Vaxson Privacy Screen Protec... 2. $24.99 HYZUO 15-16 Inch Laptop Slee... 3. $20.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 2500€ | 980 g | 13.5 mm | 14.20" 3120x2080 264 PPI OLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.