Verdict — One Of The Fastest CPU Options Available
The Omen Max 16 squeezes a ton of performance considering the size. It comes with the same Core Ultra 9 275HX CPU and 175 W GeForce RTX 5090 GPU as the competing Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 while being both heavier and smaller. The processor in particular allows the HP to outperform popular 16-inch gaming laptops like the Razer Blade 16 2025 or Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 which are limited to the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Core Ultra 9 285H, respectively. Users who can exploit the super-fast Core HX processor for their workloads may find the Omen Max 16 worthwhile especially since it comes with similar OLED panels as the competition and an arguably more comfortable keyboard.
As fast as the Arrow Lake HX CPU may be, it may be too fast for the Omen Max 16 to handle. Core temperature under load or when gaming is well over 90 C while clock rates are consistently slower than the same processor running on the aforementioned Legion Pro 7i 16. The deficit may be small, but enthusiasts who want every last drop of performance may prefer the Lenovo as a result or another model with cooler but slower CPU options.
Pros
Cons
Price and Availability
HP is now shipping the Omen Max 16 starting at $2500 for the base RTX 5070 Ti configuration up to $4000 for our RTX 5090 configuration as reviewed.
Table of Contents
- Verdict — One Of The Fastest CPU Options Available
- Specifications
- Case — Densely Packed
- Connectivity
- Input Devices — Familiar And Brighter
- Display — 240 Hz OLED With G-Sync
- Performance — Very Warm Processor Under Load
- Emissions
- Energy Management — A Very Demanding Processor
- Notebookcheck Rating
- Potential Competitors in Comparison
The Omen Max 16 is designed to the larger, heavier, and faster version of the "regular" Omen 16. It subsequently carries some of the fastest processors in the market including the Arrow Lake Core Ultra 9 275HX CPU and 175 W Blackwell GeForce RTX 5090 GPU whereas many thinner competitors offer "only" H-series processors alongside lower TGP GPUs. The Omen Max 16 aims to cut as few corners as possible when it comes to performance — at least in theory.
Lesser SKUs of this model start with the Core Ultra 7 255HX CPU and RTX 5070 Ti GPU with a 2K IPS display for $2500 USD up to our fully configured review unit with a 1600p OLED panel for over $4000 USD.
Alternatives in the 16-inch gaming space include the MSI Vector 16 HX, Lenovo Legion 9 16, or Razer Blade 16.
More HP reviews:
Specifications
Case — Densely Packed
Although their dimensions are different, the Omen Max 16 is visually very similar to the outgoing 2024 Omen 16 down to the matte black color scheme, rear design and hinges, and smooth aluminum surfaces. Main differences include the revised keyboard and new LED bar along the front edge much like on the latest Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 design.
Build quality remains excellent around the base while the lid and hinges could have been stiffer for a better sense of longevity. For example, the lid tends to teeter when adjusting angles and pressing down on the center behind the screen flexes the surface more than on the Blade 16 or aforementioned Lenovo.
HP really put the "Max" in "Omen Max 16" as the model is both thicker and heavier than the outgoing Omen 16. The weight increase in particular is notable as the system is several hundred grams heavier than competitors like the ROG Zephyrus G16 or last year's Legion 9 16IRX9. This is a fairly dense design even for a 16-inch gaming laptop.
Connectivity
Port options remain the same as on the Omen 16 despite the external and internal changes. This isn't necessarily a bad thing as the model integrates a healthy selection to be competitive against alternatives, but content creators may lament the lack of an integrated SD card reader.
Communication
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V |
Webcam
A 2 MP webcam comes standard with IR and a physical shutter.

Maintenance
The bottom panel comes off easily with just a regular Phillips screwdriver. The two M.2 2280 SSD slots and two SODIMM slots are clearly labeled for end-user upgrading. The WLAN module is also technically removable, but it is tucked underneath the cooling solution and so it is therefore more difficult to remove.
Sustainability
The outer lid and bottom covers consists of 100 percent recycled aluminum while the palm rests and bezel around the screen consist of 30 to 45 percent post-consumer recycled plastics.
Accessories And Warranty
There are no extras in the box beyond the AC adapter and paperwork. The usual one-year limited manufacturer warranty applies if purchased in the US.
Input Devices — Familiar And Brighter
Keyboard
HP has changed up the keyboard to be more like the "zero lattice" keyboard of the recent Omen Transcend 14. The RGB backlighting is more vibrant as a result while the typing experience remains decent if not shallower and with lighter feedback than on the Legion Pro 7i 16 G10. The arrow keys are unfortunately smaller this time around while a proper numpad replaces the awkward PgUp, PgDn, Home, and End keys on the 2024 design.
Touchpad
Clickpad size remains the same as on the 2024 Omen 16 at 12.5 x 8 cm. Competing models like the Blade 16 or Zephyrus G16 have more spacious clickpads in comparison, but clicking on the Omen Max 16 is not as spongy to be a fair tradeoff.
Display — 240 Hz OLED With G-Sync
The Samsung ATNA60DL02-0 OLED panel here is very similar to the panel on the recent Zephyrus G14 down to their 240 Hz refresh rate, P3 color support, brightness levels, and even pulse-width modulation behavior. It checks off all the boxes to be fit for most gaming and content editing purposes.
G-Sync and HDR500 are supported while Windows VRR is not. We're able to measure a maximum brightness of 594 nits with HDR enabled or 391 nits if only on SDR mode.
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 376.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.67 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 0.94
ΔE Greyscale 1.1 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Samsung ATNA60DL02-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | HP Omen 16 (2024) BOE BOE0B7D, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1", 240 Hz | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GA605WV ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 ATNA60DL04-0, OLED, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Chi Mei N160GME-GTB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 240 Hz | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -0% | -6% | -6% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.7 | 68.6 -31% | 99.9 0% | 96.1 -4% | 95.4 -4% | 95.3 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 98.6 -1% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.7 0% | 99.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 98.2 | 70.6 -28% | 96.9 -1% | 85 -13% | 85.4 -13% | 86.6 -12% |
Response Times | -3321% | 24% | 26% | -2096% | -1936% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.29 ? | 14.1 ? -4762% | 0.22 ? 24% | 0.2 ? 31% | 5.7 ? -1866% | 12.6 ? -4245% |
Response Time Black / White * | 0.47 ? | 9.3 ? -1879% | 0.25 ? 47% | 0.25 ? 47% | 11.4 ? -2326% | 10 ? -2028% |
PWM Frequency | 960 ? | 960 0% | 960 ? 0% | 5430 466% | ||
Screen | -21% | 0% | 11% | -30% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 376.5 | 292 -22% | 416 10% | 391 4% | 557.2 48% | 631 68% |
Brightness | 382 | 291 -24% | 418 9% | 393 3% | 506 32% | 664 74% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 85 -11% | 96 0% | 98 2% | 83 -14% | 91 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.24 | 0.41 | 0.03 | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.67 | 2.36 36% | 1.6 56% | 1.2 67% | 2.91 21% | 2.68 27% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.24 | 4.08 44% | 2.1 71% | 3.2 56% | 5.94 18% | 6.41 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.94 | 0.93 1% | 1.63 -73% | 2.68 -185% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 3 -173% | 2.7 -145% | 1.8 -64% | 3.8 -245% | 2.71 -146% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.101 105% | 2.16 102% | 2.2 100% | 2.23 99% | 2.27 97% |
CCT | 6319 103% | 5976 109% | 6331 103% | 6493 100% | 6408 101% | 6135 106% |
Contrast | 1217 | 1359 | 21033 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1121% /
-571% | 8% /
6% | 10% /
11% | -711% /
-369% | -654% /
-460% |
* ... smaller is better
The display comes fairly calibrated out of the box against the P3 standard as is usual on most OLED panels.
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.25 ms rise | |
↘ 0.22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.15 ms rise | |
↘ 0.14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 960 Hz Amplitude: 31 % | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Performance — Very Warm Processor Under Load
Testing Conditions
We set Windows and Omen Gaming Hub to Performance mode prior to running the benchmarks below. Users are encouraged to become familiar with Omen Gaming Hub for adjusting system profiles and settings. The software is nonetheless far from perfect as it tucks away important settings behind several submenus and even a storefront.
Processor
The Core Ultra 9 275HX in the Omen Max 16 is a mixed bag. On one hand, it's a lot faster than the underperforming Core i9-14900HX in the 2024 Omen 16. On the other, the CPU runs slower than most other laptops with the exact same processor including the recent Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 by up to 10 percent. This may be due to tighter thermal limitations of the HP design as our Stress Test section below suggests.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 -2! | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Dell G16 7620 -2! | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX -2! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (12302 - 15881, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (811 - 869, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (4853 - 6271, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (317 - 343, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
Dell G16 7620 |
Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (16033 - 21668, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD |
Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (2917 - 3158, n=11) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (32.6 - 43.2, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (36.9 - 62.1, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell G16 7620 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Alienware m16 R1 AMD | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7i 16 Gen 10 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (0.3943 - 0.4568, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (29330 - 39895, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (140254 - 198802, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (6998 - 9734, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (113887 - 140695, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (11172 - 14382, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72596 - 104057, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (107858 - 136847, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (1757 - 2263, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (14847 - 21372, n=10) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (47726 - 56613, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 |
Stress Test
Running Prime95 shows why the Omen Max 16 consistently falls behind the Legion Pro 7i 16 G10 even though they both ship with the same Core Ultra 9 275HX processor. The CPU in our HP would stabilize at 2.5 GHz, 98 C, and 108 W on Unleashed mode compared to 3.8 GHz, 95 C, and 156 W on the Lenovo. The latter is able to squeeze more consistent Turbo Boost performance from the CPU than on the Omen Max 16.
Owners should note that there are performance differences between the three power profiles: Balanced, Performance, and Unleashed as shown by the Cyberpunk 2077 screenshots below. The GPU power ceiling tops out at 145 W on Unleashed mode followed by 128 W on Performance mode and 81 W on Balanced mode. In other words, gamers must endure HP's maximum fan mode (i.e., Unleashed mode) to get the full power of the GPU.
CPU temperatures when gaming are warmer than we would like at almost 95 C while the GPU runs much cooler at 70 C or lower.
Average CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | Average GPU Temperature (°C) | |
System Idle | -- | -- | 57 | 36 |
Prime95 Stress | 3.5 | -- | 98 | 48 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.4 | 1747 | 94 | 77 |
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress (Unleashed mode) | 1.9 | 2347 | 94 | 64 |
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress (Performance mode) | 1.9 | 2182 | 94 | 68 |
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress (Balanced mode) | 1.6 | 1665 | 91 | 71 |
System Performance
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (8241 - 8819, n=5) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9994 - 11103, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (9122 - 9444, n=5) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (16344 - 18445, n=5) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1995 - 2282, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1847 - 2119, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (2285 - 2606, n=5) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (1673 - 2181, n=5) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (315 - 359, n=5) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (317 - 337, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop (409 - 420, n=5) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 8794 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74558 - 86978, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (74094 - 97151, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (72929 - 85648, n=10) | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX (105.8 - 125.1, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
The WDC PC SN810 SSD in our test unit would exhibit no throttling behavior when stressed for a stable maximum of ~6800 MB/s.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V | |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance — 175 W TGP Target
The mobile GeForce RTX 5090 is only 10 to 20 percent faster than the three-year old mobile RTX 4090 when it comes to raw rasterization. It's quite literally half as fast as the desktop RTX 5090 due to the inherent power limitations of laptop form factors, but it still carries upgraded 5th generation tensor cores and support for 4:2:2 encoding/decoding that are absent on the older GeForce 40 series.
Note that dropping to Performance mode from Unleashed mode reduces GPU performance by only a few percentage points as shown by our Fire Strike results table below.
Power Profile | Graphics Score | Physics Score | Combined Score |
Unleashed mode | 49342 | 44020 | 11675 |
Performance mode | 48146 (-2%) | 43466 (-1%) | 11522 (-1%) |
Balanced mode | 45941 (-7%) | 43842 (-0%) | 11319 (-3%) |
Battery Power | 15428 (-69%) | 23175 (-47%) | 2926 (-75%) |
3DMark 11 Performance | 48481 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 36501 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 22896 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming Performance
While the desktop RTX 5090 pairs well with a 4K display, the mobile RTX 5090 pairs well with a 2K or 3K displays instead. Demanding titles like Monster Hunter Wilds or Alan Wake 2 can already run on maximum settings at over 60 FPS on a 2K display before applying any DLSS or FG features. DLSS and/or slightly lower settings are recommended if gaming on an external 4K display to keep frame rates above 60.
Multi-frame generation is not recommended if FPS is 60 or lower as input delay becomes very noticeable based on our time with Alan Wake 2 or Indiana Jones. Lower settings, lower resolutions, and/or DLSS Performance mode are recommended instead to boost base frame rates before applying MFG.
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD DLSS | QHD | 4K DLSS | 4K FSR | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 215 | 186.6 | 178.9 | 161 | 151.6 | ||||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 226 | 203 | 177.2 | 104.7 | |||||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 140.4 | 141.5 | 112.6 | 89.9 | |||||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 382 | 319 | 179.6 | ||||||
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 173.7 | 171.6 | 161.5 | 151.9 | 126.2 | 111.3 | 80.2 | 46.4 | 52.8 |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 82.9 | 69.7 | 46.2 | ||||||
F1 24 (2024) | 152.2 | 104.3 | 87.9 | 52 | |||||
Indiana Jones and the Great Circle (2024) | 142.3 | 120.6 | 115.9 | 68.6 | |||||
Monster Hunter Wilds (2025) | 88.2 | 85 | 74.7 | 64 | 47.5 | ||||
Assassin's Creed Shadows (2025) | 70 | 64 | 55 | 53 | 40 |
Emissions
System Noise
The fans do an excellent job at staying quiet when running undemanding loads like browsers or videos with minimal pulsing behavior. On the flip side, they can become quite loud very quickly even when on Balanced mode where we're able to measure 48 dB(A) during the first 90 seconds of 3DMark 06. This behavior is unfortunately common on gaming laptops.
Fan noise when running Cyberpunk 2077 on Balanced, Performance, and Unleashed modes would stabilize at 45 dB(A), 55 dB(A), and 61 dB(A), respectively. Headphones are recommend at 60 dB(A) or above as even the internal speakers aren't loud enough to overcome the fans at this stage. Unleashed mode squeezes the most performance out of the GPU as mentioned in the GPU section above, but the gains are very small relative to the very loud increase in noise. Gamers may want to consider Performance mode or Balanced mode instead as a result.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB(A) |
Load |
| 47.7 / 61.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 275HX, WDC PC SN810 2TB | HP Omen 16 (2024) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006 | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, SSSTC CA6-8D2048 | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | 4% | 4% | -10% | 15% | |
off / environment * | 22.8 | 25 -10% | 23.8 -4% | 24.1 -6% | 23.2 -2% | 23 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 29 | 29 -0% | 23.8 18% | 24.1 17% | 33.5 -16% | 23 21% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 30 -3% | 27.2 6% | 30.6 -6% | 33.5 -16% | 23 21% |
Idle Maximum * | 29 | 31 -7% | 31.3 -8% | 30.6 -6% | 33.5 -16% | 23 21% |
Load Average * | 47.7 | 46 4% | 47.6 -0% | 45.5 5% | 52.1 -9% | 39 18% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 54.8 | 51.3 6% | 48.2 12% | |||
Load Maximum * | 61.1 | 47 23% | 53.3 13% | 53.4 13% | 62 -1% | 55.56 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 62 | 55.32 |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Hot spots when gaming can reach over 35 C and 46 C on the keyboard and bottom cover, respectively. These areas are toward the rear of the unit away from commonly touched areas like the palm rests, WASD keys, or numpad. Most notably, average temperatures are significantly cooler than what we observed on the 2024 Omen 16 by several degrees C likely due to all the internal updates.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.2 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the class Gaming.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26 °C / 78.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -4% | 4% | -10% | 11% | -31% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 42.8 | 47 -10% | 44 -3% | 48.3 -13% | 36.4 15% | 56 -31% |
Maximum Bottom * | 50.2 | 57 -14% | 44.1 12% | 53.3 -6% | 35.6 29% | 53 -6% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.6 | 25 9% | 26.1 5% | 28.3 -3% | 26.6 4% | 38 -38% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.2 | 26 1% | 25.5 3% | 30.3 -16% | 27 -3% | 39 -49% |
* ... smaller is better
Speakers
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Energy Management — A Very Demanding Processor
Power Consumption
Consumption ranges wildly when idling on desktop due to the OLED panel and GPU settings. When on Power Saver iGPU mode with brightness set to minimum, for example, idling can be as low as 10 W versus 47 W when idling on Performance dGPU mode on maximum brightness showing an all-white screen.
Consumption would cycle between 130 W and 270 W when running Prime95 and FurMark simultaneously even when on Unleashed mode to suggest issues maintaining consistent performance when fully stressed. Though such extreme loads are uncommon, running this same test on most other gaming laptops would show steadier and more consistent results in comparison.
Running Cyberpunk 2077 demands significantly more power than on the ROG Zephyrus G16 or Blade 16 all with the same RTX 5090 GPU likely due to both the HX-series CPU and higher TGP target of our HP.
We're able to record a maximum draw of 309 W from the large (~20 x 9 x 2.5 cm) 330 W AC adapter when the CPU and GPU are fully stressed.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, WDC PC SN810 2TB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.1" | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEPNSJ-2T00-1006, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, SSSTC CA6-8D2048, OLED, 2560x1600, 16" | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Micron 3400 2TB MTFDKBA2T0TFH, MiniLED, 3200x2000, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 13% | 31% | 25% | -5% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 9.9 | 9 9% | 9.4 5% | 10.9 -10% | 15.8 -60% | 20.5 -107% |
Idle Average * | 28.6 | 16 44% | 13.6 52% | 13.5 53% | 23.3 19% | 27.7 3% |
Idle Maximum * | 47.1 | 35 26% | 15.8 66% | 13.7 71% | 30 36% | 32.1 32% |
Load Average * | 141.8 | 129 9% | 115.4 19% | 120.2 15% | 123.9 13% | 105 26% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 230 | 160.4 30% | 177.6 23% | |||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 253 | 164.5 35% | 178.2 30% | |||
Load Maximum * | 233 | 285 -22% | 216.7 7% | 246.1 -6% | 306 -31% | 323 -39% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 150.8 | 285 | 246 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
Battery Life
WLAN runtime is almost exactly the same as what we recorded on the 2024 Omen 16 when under similar Balanced power profiles and iGPU settings. While that may sound lackluster at first, keep in mind that our 2025 model utilizes a more demanding higher resolution OLED panel compared to the IPS panel on the older model.
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Ultra 9 275HX, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 83 Wh | HP Omen 16 (2024) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh | Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Ultra 9 285H, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop, 90 Wh | MSI Vector 16 HX A14V i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | 54% | 36% | 12% | 33% | |
Reader / Idle | 522 | 641 23% | ||||
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 352 1% | 540 54% | 475 36% | 332 -5% | 290 -17% |
Load | 71 | 84 18% | 129 82% | |||
H.264 | 592 | 294 | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra 150cd | 71 |
Notebookcheck Rating
HP Omen Max 16 ah000
- 05/03/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
HP Omen Max 16 ah000 Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $3,299.00 List Price: 3800 USD | 2.8 kg | 24.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
HP Omen 16 (2024) Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,169.09 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... 2. $1,099.99 HP OMEN 16 inch Laptop, FHD ... 3. $1,399.00 HP Omen 16 2024 Gaming Lapto... List Price: 3200 Euro | 2.4 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" 2560x1440 182 PPI IPS | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 GU605CX Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $99.99 240W Laptop Charger for Asus... 2. $1,839.00 ASUS ROG Zephyrus G16 Gaming... 3. $20.98 Puccy 2 Pack Film Protector,... List Price: 4799€ | 1.9 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
Razer Blade 16 2025 RTX 5090 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 Laptop ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $4,499.99 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 2. $5,495.00 Razer Blade 18 Gaming Laptop... 3. $5,698.00 Razer Blade 16 Gaming Laptop... List Price: 4399€ | 2.1 kg | 17.4 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI OLED | |
MSI Vector 16 HX A14V Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,670.00 MSI Vector 16 HX 16” 240Hz... 2. $45.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 3. $59.99 Smatree 16 inch Laptop Sleev... List Price: 2700 USD | 2.7 kg | 28.55 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX ⎘ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU ⎘ 64 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $4,799.00 List Price: 4899 Euro | 2.5 kg | 22.7 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI MiniLED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.