Verdict — Modern AMD Zen 5 With Stackable Form Factor
While the new EVO-X1 gives off excellent first impressions, a bit of digging or use uncovers some rough patches. The loud fans under load, questionable RGB LEDs, and power state bugs when turned off or in sleep mode all suggest that the model could have benefited from more fine-tuning before launch.
Look beyond the annoyances or bugs and the EVO-X1 is still an attractive and powerful mini PC for home, office, or professional purposes. Its main selling point is the integrated Oculink port meaning that buyers will want to exploit this feature to really make the most out of the model. Otherwise, other mini PCs like the Beelink SER9 come with similar AMD Zen 5 processor options but with removable RAM for a little less money.
Pros
Cons
Price and Availability
The EVO-X1 as reviewed is now on sale at Amazon for $900. Alternatively, users can purchased directly from the manufacturer starting at $920.
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GMK EVO-X1 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $899.99 List Price: 900 USD | 595 g | 63.2 mm | x | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950H ⎘ AMD Radeon 680M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $369.99 List Price: 440 USD | 621 g | 58.4 mm | x | |
GMK NucBox K9 Intel Core Ultra 5 125H ⎘ Intel Arc 7-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $639.99 List Price: 560 USD | 528 g | 47 mm | x | |
Beelink SER9 AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 ⎘ AMD Radeon 890M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $999.00 List Price: 1000 USD | 814 g | 44.7 mm | x | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $889.99 ASUS NUC 14 Pro Tall Full Sy... 2. $849.00 ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini Comp... 3. $909.00 ASUS NUC 14 Pro AI Mini PC, ... List Price: 1250 EUR | 622 g | 41 mm | x | |
BOSGAME M2 AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS ⎘ AMD Radeon 780M ⎘ 32 GB Memory | Amazon: $699.00 List Price: 600 USD | 819 g | 51 mm | x |
The EVO-X1 is the latest generation mini PC from GMKtec. it represents a departure from the traditional NucBox series with its brand new chassis design, RGB LEDs, and Oculink support.
Our test unit comes equipped with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, integrated Radeon 890M graphics, 32 GB of LPDDR5-7500 soldered RAM, and 1 TB NVMe SSD for approximately $920. Other SKUs may come with a larger SSD, but the CPU and RAM are fixed across all options at the moment.
Alternatives to the EVO-X1 include other high-performance mini PCs like the Beelink SER9, Asus NUC 14 Pro+, or BOSGAME M2.
More GMK reviews:
Specifications
Case
The new case design helps to visually distinguish the EVO-X1 from competitors. Its sharp boxy look and metal outer chassis feel more professional than the largely plastic NucBox series. Size and weight are also smaller and lighter than expected due in part to the soldered RAM.
The RGB LEDs are a mixed bag, however, as they conflict with the otherwise professional appearance. We can find no BIOS settings or application to toggle the LEDs, either. They even remain lit when the unit is powered off or when in Sleep mode.
Connectivity
The most notable feature of the EVO-X1 is its Oculink port. Unlike USB4, Oculink supports eGPUs with higher bandwidth and direct PCIe connections for specific applications. The system is compatible with the recently released GMK AD-GP1 Oculink eGPU.
Communication
An Intel AX200 comes standard for Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2 support. The model does not ship with Wi-Fi 6E or Wi-Fi 7 support which is a bit disappointing considering the relatively high price.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 |
Maintenance
Servicing is slightly different from most other mini PCs. Firstly, the C-shaped metal cover must be removed via four hand screws along the bottom. Next, a Phillips screwdriver is required to remove the white fan as shown below to reveal the upgradeable components.
Sustainability
GMK does not share any sustainability measures taken during the manufacturing process. The packaging itself is mostly cardboard with some foam protection.
Accessoies And Warranty
Performance
Testing Conditions
We set Windows to Performance mode prior to running the benchmarks below.
Processor
The Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is one AMD's fastest AI HX-series processors available beating out the competing Core Ultra 9 185H by a decent 15 percent margin. The Core i9-14900HX is even faster still, but it lacks an integrated NPU. The year-over-year leap over the outgoing Ryzen 7 8845HS is also decent at around 20 to 25 percent.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
Minisforum AtomMan G7 Ti | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (20.3 - 28.7, n=17) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Beelink SER6 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox K3 Pro | |
Lenovo IdeaCentre Mini 01IRH8-90W20081GF |
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (24673 - 37804, n=16) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (95655 - 147937, n=17) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (4421 - 5926, n=17) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (41744 - 99088, n=17) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (16445 - 19115, n=17) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (50357 - 93798, n=16) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (67015 - 118806, n=17) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (1077 - 1530, n=17) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (13665 - 20648, n=17) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (36752 - 51727, n=17) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
System Performance
PCMark results are comparable to other Ryzen 9 or Core Ultra H mini PCs including the NucBox K9. The biggest difference comes in RAM performance as integrated LPDDR5 RAM is generally faster than the removable RAM modules on most other mini PCs.
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Beelink SER9 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (6577 - 7646, n=10) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9277 - 11262, n=10) | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (8497 - 10615, n=10) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (9334 - 11422, n=10) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Overall | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1402 - 1847, n=9) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1253 - 1719, n=9) | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1707 - 2211, n=9) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (1085 - 1610, n=9) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (252 - 342, n=9) | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (210 - 277, n=10) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Beelink SER9 |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, AMD Radeon 890M (419 - 503, n=11) | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7341 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (72702 - 93640, n=17) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (84635 - 102937, n=17) | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (83907 - 108954, n=17) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (87.2 - 119.4, n=17) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latency
LatencyMon reveals only minor DPC issues when opening multiple browser tabs of our homepage. 4K60 video playback is unfortunately imperfect with 5 dropped frames recorded during a 60-second period. It's not major enough to be noticeable for most users, but it should ideally be zero nonetheless.
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 |
* ... smaller is better
Storage Devices
Our unit ships with the same Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 as found on the Beelink SER9 which is an upgrade from the Zettastone CP200 on the GMK NucBox M7 Pro. Transfer rates are steady at ~4800 MB/s compared to ~3500 MB/s on the Zettastone.
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER9 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU Performance
The Radeon 890M is roughly 10 to 15 percent faster than the outgoing Radeon 780M or about 5 to 15 percent faster than last year's competing Arc 8. The more recent Intel Arc Graphics 140V can stand neck-to-neck with our AMD solution, but the GPU is still relatively new and not yet common on mini PCs.
3DMark 11 Performance | 14855 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39149 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8896 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4017 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Beelink SER6 Pro | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
GMK NucBox K3 Pro | |
Beelink SER6 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (214 - 306, n=12) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Lenovo ThinkCentre Neo Ultra | |
v3.3 Classroom oneAPI/Intel | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
Asus NUC 14 Pro+ |
* ... smaller is better
Gaming Performance
The Radeon 890M is one of the fastest integrated solutions in the market for gaming purposes. It's powerful enough to run demanding games like Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p provided that you tune down most settings to Low or Low-Medium.
F1 22 | |
1280x720 Ultra Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (160.9 - 186.8, n=6) | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (81 - 111.2, n=9) | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (76.8 - 102.9, n=9) | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (64.2 - 78.1, n=9) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro | |
GMK NucBox K9 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
Beelink GTI12 Ultra EX Docking Station | |
Average AMD Radeon 890M (16.7 - 22, n=9) | |
GMK EVO-X1 | |
BOSGAME M2 | |
GMK NucBox K6 | |
Beelink SER8 | |
GMK NucBox M7 Pro |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 149.1 | 145.9 | 78.8 | 32.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 142.7 | 112.7 | 93.4 | 83.3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 88.8 | 45.6 | 32.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 82.6 | 62.4 | 46.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 92 | 57 | 53 | 50 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 191.3 | 80.6 | 68.6 | 58.4 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 85.2 | 62.4 | 41.4 | 33 |
F1 22 (2022) | 106.3 | 96.1 | 72.7 | 19.7 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 41.3 | 34.1 | 28.6 | 28.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 49.2 | 38.2 | 28.7 | 25.1 |
Emissions
System Noise
Fan noise is arguably the weakest aspect of the model. Not only are the fans always active, but they pulse and increase in RPM quite readily even when set to Balanced mode. When running 3DMark 06, for example, fan noise would increase to almost 45 dB(A) not even halfway into the first benchmark scene to be noticeably louder than many other mini PCs. Expect this same noise level when gaming as well.
Noise Level
Idle |
| 27.8 / 30.3 / 30.4 dB(A) |
Load |
| 44.6 / 46.1 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GMK EVO-X1 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | GMK NucBox M7 Pro Radeon 680M, R9 PRO 6950H | GMK NucBox K9 Arc 7-Core, Ultra 5 125H, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000 | Beelink SER9 Radeon 890M, Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8 | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU | BOSGAME M2 Radeon 780M, R9 7940HS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -4% | 15% | -1% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 23.3 | 23 1% | 23 1% | 23.2 -0% | 24.6 -6% | 23 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 27.8 | 35.9 -29% | 29.8 -7% | 26.6 4% | 24.7 11% | 31.5 -13% |
Idle Average * | 30.3 | 36.7 -21% | 35.7 -18% | 26.8 12% | 29.6 2% | 32.3 -7% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.4 | 36.7 -21% | 35.7 -17% | 26.8 12% | 29.8 2% | 34.9 -15% |
Load Average * | 44.6 | 38.4 14% | 41.9 6% | 33.4 25% | 45.7 -2% | 39 13% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 44.2 | 38.7 12% | 43.8 1% | 34.6 22% | 47.7 -8% | 40.3 9% |
Load Maximum * | 46.1 | 39.8 14% | 44 5% | 33.8 27% | 47.4 -3% | 42.5 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Temperature
Exhaust escapes from the two sides of the chassis instead of the rear unlike the vast majority of mini PCs in the market. It's therefore not recommended to place the unit on its side without the included vertical stand for optimal airflow. Fresh air still enters from the slits along the top edge of the chassis.
Stress Test
The CPU would stabilize at 2.9 GHz, 67 C, and 54 W when initiating Prime95 stress compared to 3.3 GHz, 71 C, and 54 W on the Beelink SER9 equipped with the same Ryzen AI 9 HX processor. Our GMK would similarly run slightly cooler and slower when playing Cyberpunk 2077 as well. Core temperature would remain below 70 C no matter the onscreen load.
Average CPU Clock (GHz) | GPU Clock (MHz) | Average CPU Temperature (°C) | |
System Idle | -- | -- | 26 |
Prime95 Stress | 2.9 | -- | 67 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 2.3 | 1583 | 68 |
Cyberpunk 2077 Stress | 0.8 | 2249 | 65 |
Energy Management
Power Consumption
Average power consumption is slightly lower than the Zen 4-powered Beelink SER8 while simultaneously providing faster CPU and GPU performance for increased performance-per-watt. Unfortunately, the GMK suffers from power state issues when turned off or when in sleep mode as mentioned above and this is evident in our readings where consumption levels would range between 3 W and 13 W when they should ideally be 2 W or less.
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
GMK EVO-X1 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | GMK NucBox M7 Pro R9 PRO 6950H, Radeon 680M, , , x, | GMK NucBox K9 Ultra 5 125H, Arc 7-Core, MasonSemi 1TB MC7000, , x, | Beelink SER9 Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, Radeon 890M, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8, , x, | Asus NUC 14 Pro+ Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, Samsung PM9A1a MZVL21T0HDLU, , x, | BOSGAME M2 R9 7940HS, Radeon 780M, , , x, | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -92% | -39% | -4% | -36% | -21% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.4 | 14.6 -170% | 10.9 -102% | 5.7 -6% | 4.2 22% | 6.4 -19% |
Idle Average * | 5.8 | 15 -159% | 11 -90% | 5.9 -2% | 7.2 -24% | 7.3 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.8 | 16 -176% | 11.4 -97% | 6 -3% | 13 -124% | 7.5 -29% |
Load Average * | 72.1 | 80.4 -12% | 52.8 27% | 68.7 5% | 68.5 5% | 75 -4% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 72.5 | 86.2 -19% | 57.1 21% | 78.2 -8% | 74.1 -2% | 83 -14% |
Load Maximum * | 76.1 | 89.5 -18% | 72.2 5% | 82 -8% | 144.9 -90% | 99.9 -31% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Cyberpunk / Stress Test
Power Consumption external Monitor
Notebookcheck Rating
GMK EVO-X1
- 02/18/2025 v8
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.