MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH gaming laptop review: GPU performance sacrificed for a slimmer build ↺

While other MSI gaming laptops are rather bulky (we recall the 17-inch GT76 monster, for example), the GS series makes a very subtle and discreet impression. The latest 17-inch model is powered by a processor from Intel's 11th generation. Models with the Core i7-11800H and Core i9-11900H are currently listed on the German homepage.
Demanding graphics computations are handled either by the GeForce RTX 3070 with 8 GB of VRAM or a GeForce RTX 3080 with 8 or 16 GB of VRAM. This is accompanied by 32 to 64 GB of DDR4-3200 RAM as well as an NVMe SSD with a capacity of 1 or 2 TB. For the display, you can choose between a Full HD panel with 300 or 360 Hz, or a 4K panel with 120 Hz.
Our review is based on the GS76 11UH-074 version that costs around 4,400 Euros (~$5,159). It comes with 64 GB of RAM, a 2 TB SSD, the Core i9-11900H, and the GeForce RTX 3080.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- Specialist News Writer
- Magazine Writer
- Translator (DE<->EN)
Details here
The competitors of the GS76 11UH include other high-end gaming laptops with the GeForce RTX 3080 that are no thicker than 2.5 cm. Besides the Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD and the Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD, the Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 and the Medion Erazer Beast X25 should also be mentioned here. These laptops are listed in the tables as comparison devices.
Join our Support Satisfaction Survey 2023: We want to hear about your experiences!
Participate here
Possible contenders in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.2 % | 09/2021 | MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.4 kg | 20 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
88 % | 05/2021 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD i9-11980HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 22 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
90.1 % | 07/2021 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
87.8 % | 02/2021 | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
85 % | 07/2021 | Medion Erazer Beast X25 R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 |
Case
Let's get straight to one of the biggest weaknesses: Although the GS series has become a bit sturdier over the generations, the current model still struggles with its stability and resistance to torsion. When strong pressure is applied, not only does the base unit flex noticeably in the area of the touchpad, but also in the center of the keyboard. Most manufacturers do a better job here despite the similarly thin designs.
Otherwise, there's hardly anything to criticize about the case. In comparison to the predecessor, the GS75, MSI doesn't use gold-colored elements, which makes the 17-incher look even more sober while also making a stylish and discreet impression in any situation or environment. Apart from the slightly rough transition between the C and D covers in some areas, the build quality is also able to impress. The GS76 is also pleasing in terms of quality. The dark metal surfaces are fingerprint magnets, but they feel very high-quality apart from their lack of stability.
Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks
under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1,000 USD/Euros, for University Students, Best Displays
Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤6-inch, Camera Smartphones
With a weight of around 2.4 kg, the GS75 is also one of the lightest 17-inch gaming devices. With the exception of the Medion Beast X25, all competitors are a few hundred grams heavier (2.8 - 3.0 kg). In combination with its low build height (about 2 cm without the feet), the MSI laptop is quite comfortable to carry around.
Connectivity
Ports
MSI is up to date when it comes to ports. As you would expect from a modern gaming laptop, the GS76 offers a Thunderbolt 4 port that supports DisplayPort as well as Power Delivery. Together with the second USB Type-C port (also with DisplayPort support), and the HDMI 2.1 output (120 Hz @4K or 60 Hz @8K), up to three external monitors can be connected. In addition, there are two classic USB Type-A ports (3.2 Gen 2), a 2.5 Gigabit LAN port (Killer E3100G Ethernet controller), a 3.5 mm audio jack, a card reader (UHS-III), and a slot for Kensington locks.
Because the ports are crammed into the central area of the two lateral surfaces, motion limitations can occur when using a mouse, depending on the amount of cables involved.
SD card reader
The card reader delivers a very good performance. With 199 MB/s in sequential reading and 196 MB/s when transferring photos with our 128 GB AV Pro V60 reference microSD card, it ranks second in the test field. Only the Razer Blade 17 Pro 2021 performs even better.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average of class Gaming (48.5 - 209, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Average of class Gaming (72 - 269, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
Communication
The Wi-Fi 6E Killer AX1675x chip is responsible for wireless connections. It supports Bluetooth 5.2 and the WLAN 802.11b/g/n/ac/ax standard. The GS76 shows no weakness in the test with our Netgear Nighthawk AX12 reference router (1 m distance). 1,499 Mb/s (sending) and 1,328 Mb/s (receiving) are excellent rates, respectively.
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (1066 - 1499, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (450 - 1580, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW) (1037 - 1469, n=8) | |
Average of class Gaming (90 - 1743, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD |
Webcam
The built-in 720p webcam proves to be less impressive. As with most rivals, it lacks color accuracy and image sharpness.

Accessories
The box includes a 230-watt power adapter, which isn't particularly compact, and a few information booklets.
Maintenance
The maintenance options are rather disappointing. Those who break the factory seal on the case's bottom and remove the 15 cross-head screws can indeed lift off the entire bottom cover, but only the fans, the battery, the M.2 slots, and the wireless module are accessible inside due to the presence of huge, glued foil surfaces. The CPU's or GPU's cooling system and the RAM can't be accessed easily. This is unnecessary and is solved in a better way by other manufacturers.
Warranty
The warranty period extends to 24 months (Pickup & Return service).
Input devices
Keyboard
As usual with MSI laptops, the keyboard layout takes a lot of getting used to, and it differs from the standard in many places (see photo), which is why you first need to spend some time becoming familiar with it. Despite the suboptimal stability, the keyboard scores points with a good typing experience. Not least thanks to the relatively high key travel and the clear stroke, a firm feedback is generated, and inputs aren't particularly quiet. Older GS models partly came with rather mushy keyboards. We can therefore see an improvement here.
With the exception of the somewhat narrow number pad keys, the dimensions are good. Gamers can also enjoy the RGB lighting that can be adjusted in several levels. A minor drawback: Due to the keyboard's centered position, the height of the palm rest is limited. As a result, larger hands will rest unpleasantly on the case's edge.
Touchpad
In general, the touchpad has some catching up to do. Due to the moderate stability, the mouse replacement can clearly be pushed down, and it quickly rattles with inputs, which is detrimental to the perceived quality. Accuracy could also be a bit better. At least the smooth surface provides a pleasant gliding experience. The dimensions leave mixed feelings. While the touchpad is pleasantly wide at 12 cm, the height of 6 cm is a bit low. There were no problems with gesture support (zooming and scrolling with two fingers, etc.).
Display
The top model is equipped with the sharpest of the available displays. The 4K display has the AUO B173ZAN06.1 designation and offers a resolution of 3840x2160 pixels.
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 474 cd/m²
Contrast: 1030:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.5 | 0.55-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.4
65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
94.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.158
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD AU Optronics AUO329B, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30 | Medion Erazer Beast X25 BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 32% | 28% | 33% | 9% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 63 | 86.9 38% | 94.2 50% | 88.6 41% | 70.4 12% |
sRGB Coverage | 94.8 | 100 5% | 98.7 4% | 100 5% | 99.8 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 65 | 99.6 53% | 84.4 30% | 99.9 54% | 71.6 10% |
Response Times | -399% | 10% | -81% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.8 ? | 52 ? -491% | 4.8 45% | 15.2 ? -73% | 9.2 ? -5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 6.4 ? | 26 ? -306% | 8 -25% | 12 ? -88% | 5.6 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | 22% | -31% | -115% | -10% | |
Brightness middle | 474 | 488 3% | 322 -32% | 407.2 -14% | 329 -31% |
Brightness | 454 | 467 3% | 288 -37% | 403 -11% | 315 -31% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 72 -18% | 90 2% | 88 0% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.33 28% | 0.3 35% | 0.42 9% | 0.33 28% |
Contrast | 1030 | 1479 44% | 1073 4% | 970 -6% | 997 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.5 | 1.23 18% | 3.05 -103% | 7.25 -383% | 2.03 -35% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.59 | 2.94 47% | 5.23 6% | 12.51 -124% | 5.5 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.86 | 0.77 10% | 1.92 -123% | 3.62 -321% | 0.82 5% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 1.5 46% | 3.11 -11% | 8.1 -189% | 3.5 -25% |
Gamma | 2.158 102% | 2.169 101% | 2.13 103% | 2.24 98% | 2.223 99% |
CCT | 6597 99% | 6614 98% | 6553 99% | 5925 110% | 6526 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 99 | 84 | 88.1 | ||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | 99 | 100 | ||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -115% /
-36% | 2% /
-13% | -54% /
-78% | 1% /
-4% |
* ... smaller is better
Unlike some other 4K laptops, the refresh rate is not 60 Hz, but 120 Hz instead, which should make the GS76 suitable for fast games as well. This statement is supported by the measured response times. 6.4 ms for black-to-white and 8.8 ms for gray-to-gray are very good by laptop standards - especially for UHD displays.
The remaining results are also respectable. Only the Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD comes close to the average brightness of 454 cd/m², but it has significantly worse response times. Thanks to this value and the matte surface, outdoor use is possible even in somewhat brighter places, as long as you don't expose it to excessive sunlight.
The contrast of 1,030:1 only ranks in the midfield. The reason for this is the suboptimal black level of 0.46 cd/m². There are no surprises in terms of viewing angles. As expected from wide-view panels (IPS level), minor shifts in colors and brightness are only visible from very oblique viewing angles. We didn't observe any screen flickering (like PWM, for instance) or an excessive amount of screen bleeding.
The color reproduction is already very good out of the box (DeltaE 2000 less than 2). Calibration improves the average DeltaE value to less than 1 (our ICC file is linked above). As for color space, 95% of sRGB is covered, followed by 65% of AdobeRGB. All display measurements were performed using the True Color mode "sRGB" (MSI software for controlling image reproduction).
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2 ms rise | |
↘ 4.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.2 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 18889 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
Test conditions
Performance
An octa-core CPU, 16 GB GPU, and a generous 64 GB of RAM: The GS76 11UH-074 falls into the absolute high-end range - not surprising considering the hefty price of 4,400 Euros (~$5,159).
Processor
MSI chose one of the strongest processors from Intel's current Tiger Lake generation for its top model. The Core i9-11900H offers 24 MB of L3 cache and eight cores, and up to 16 parallel threads are possible via Hyper-Threading. The base clock speed of the 10 nm chip is 2.5 GHz. Under load - depending on the application and stress - up to 4.9 GHz can be reached. The TDP of 45 watts is in line with most other mobile CPUs with six or eight cores. The HWiNFO tool indicates a PL1 value of 90 watts and a PL2 one of 109 watts.
The GS76 excels with a very high speed in our benchmark course, but its performance drops a bit over time as our Cinebench loop shows. The comparison laptops based on the 11900H/11980HK or the 5900HX tend to gain a bit of ground in the long run. Older Comet Lake counterparts (e.g. with the Core i7-10875H) fall considerably behind, on the other hand.
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Cinebench R23 | |
Multi Core | |
Average of class Gaming (2435 - 34521, n=237, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (11567 - 13012, n=3) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Single Core | |
Average of class Gaming (527 - 2169, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (1574 - 1586, n=3) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (930 - 13769, n=238, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (4403 - 5160, n=4) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Gaming (169 - 825, n=238, last 2 years) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (600 - 610, n=4) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (400 - 5663, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (2029 - 2211, n=4) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Gaming (79.2 - 312, n=242, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (236 - 241, n=4) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (231 - 249, n=4) | |
Average of class Gaming (91 - 1259, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD |
7-Zip 18.03 | |
7z b 4 | |
Average of class Gaming (11386 - 140932, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (50441 - 57263, n=4) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Gaming (2685 - 7581, n=236, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (5582 - 5870, n=4) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
Geekbench 5.4 | |
Multi-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (1946 - 22200, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (7725 - 9856, n=4) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Single-Core | |
Average of class Gaming (158 - 2139, n=234, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (1576 - 1648, n=4) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
Average of class Gaming (3 - 37.6, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (14.9 - 16.7, n=4) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 332, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (40.5 - 49.3, n=4) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H (0.529 - 0.544, n=4) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average of class Gaming (0.375 - 4.47, n=235, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 |
* ... smaller is better
System performance
The system performance of the GS76 11UH meets the high expectations, despite it only being sufficient for the second-to-last place in PCMark 10. The differences in the overall score are marginal, though.
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Gaming (4477 - 9331, n=195, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6822 - 7245, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average of class Gaming (7334 - 12176, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (9690 - 10630, n=2) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average of class Gaming (6161 - 11833, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (8882 - 9182, n=2) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average of class Gaming (5288 - 16424, n=194, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Average Intel Core i9-11900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (10014 - 10573, n=2) | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) |
PCMark 10 Score | 6822 points | |
Help |
DPC latencies
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH |
* ... smaller is better
Storage
Things really take off when it comes to storage. MSI provides the 17-incher with an extremely fast PCIe 4 SSD that significantly outperforms older PCIe 3 drives (at least on paper). The 2 TB version of the Samsung PM9A1 was also installed in our test device of the Asus ROG GX703HSD, and as expected, it performed similarly well there. If you want to expand the storage space, there's still an empty M.2 slot inside the case (but only PCIe 3.0).
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Medion Erazer Beast X25 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 2% | 1% | -44% | -37% | |
Write 4K | 230.7 | 230.4 0% | 244.2 6% | 123.5 -46% | 129.7 -44% |
Read 4K | 87.9 | 91.6 4% | 89.8 2% | 45.96 -48% | 62.4 -29% |
Write Seq | 4300 | 4216 -2% | 1861 -57% | 2436 -43% | |
Read Seq | 4392 | 4543 3% | 1584 -64% | 2354 -46% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 582 | 667 15% | 607 4% | 466.4 -20% | 512 -12% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 730 | 728 0% | 658 -10% | 566 -22% | 436.2 -40% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 5152 | 5043 -2% | 5270 2% | 2981 -42% | 3541 -31% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 7094 | 6821 -4% | 7091 0% | 3260 -54% | 3568 -50% |
AS SSD | -1% | 14% | -67% | -28% | |
Seq Read | 5408 | 5438 1% | 5085 -6% | 2068 -62% | 2591 -52% |
Seq Write | 3863 | 3904 1% | 4434 15% | 2047 -47% | 1900 -51% |
4K Read | 52.7 | 56.2 7% | 80.3 52% | 47.85 -9% | 53.9 2% |
4K Write | 153.1 | 165.8 8% | 214.7 40% | 87.4 -43% | 112.6 -26% |
4K-64 Read | 2692 | 2489 -8% | 2573 -4% | 1932 -28% | 1335 -50% |
4K-64 Write | 3414 | 3480 2% | 2972 -13% | 2017 -41% | 2966 -13% |
Access Time Read * | 0.046 | 0.054 -17% | 0.018 61% | 0.055 -20% | 0.038 17% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.026 4% | 0.02 26% | 0.128 -374% | 0.036 -33% |
Score Read | 3285 | 3089 -6% | 3161 -4% | 2187 -33% | 1648 -50% |
Score Write | 3953 | 4036 2% | 3631 -8% | 2309 -42% | 3269 -17% |
Score Total | 8830 | 8620 -2% | 8380 -5% | 5612 -36% | 5733 -35% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1% /
0% | 8% /
9% | -56% /
-57% | -33% /
-32% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Graphics card
Estimating the performance of current Nvidia graphics cards is not an easy task due to the strongly differing TGPs. In the case of the GS76, the GeForce RTX 3080, which theoretically reaches up to 165 watts (incl. Dynamic Boost), only runs with a TGP of 95 watts; this can lead to the top model from Nvidia's Ampere series performing slower than a much cheaper RTX 3070.
Correspondingly, it's hardly surprising that the GS76 finishes last in the synthetic graphics benchmarks. Despite its comparable height, the Asus Zephyrus S17 is partly over 20% faster. No wonder, since Asus allows the RTX 3080 to consume 140 Watts. Whether the emissions are at least lower in return than those of the competition is something that we'll analyze shortly.
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (31288 - 43744, n=36) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72070, n=233, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH |
3DMark | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (16455 - 32366, n=42) | |
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=240, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (6407 - 13210, n=41) | |
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22547, n=241, last 2 years) | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH |
3DMark 11 Performance | 28333 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35442 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 21544 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 9326 points | |
Help |
Gaming performance
The weak TGP has a negative impact on the gaming benchmarks as well. The GS76 often has to admit defeat to its rivals here too. Nevertheless, performance is sufficient to run all the latest games smoothly in FHD or QHD with maximum details. However, things can get a bit tight at the native 4K resolution and/or when ray tracing is enabled, which is shown by our benchmarks. In this case, Crysis Remastered drops below the 30 FPS mark, for example. If the resolution is reduced when necessary, passionate gamers will still be satisfied with the 3D performance of the GS76 11UH.
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (149 - 242, n=30) | |
Average of class Gaming (17.5 - 449, n=176, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD | |
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 (QHD Touch) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU (85.1 - 123, n=38) | |
Average of class Gaming (8.61 - 216, n=239, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X25 | |
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH | |
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR YD |
We tested how the graphics performance behaves over a prolonged period of time with the role-playing game The Witcher 3 for a good 60 minutes (FHD/Ultra). Similar to the CPU, the GPU performance also decreases a bit after a while, but we can't say that there are major performance drops.