Notebookcheck Logo

Aorus 17X XES review: Gaming laptop with an i9-12900HX offers top performance

Not only for gaming. With its 360-Hertz panel, RGB keyboard, and Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, the Gigabyte laptop is fully designed for gaming. At the same time, the Intel processor used and the amount of RAM also offer abundant power. How exactly this turns out will be shown by our benchmarks and gaming tests.
The Aorus 17X XES offers 16 cores and 24 threads.
The Aorus 17X XES offers 16 cores and 24 threads.

With its most important key specifications, the laptop is predestined for gaming. Because of its 360-Hertz panel, the Aorus 17X is supposed to handle high frame rates particularly well. Considering the Intel i9-12900HX, which is currently the most powerful mobile processor of the Alder Lake class with its abundant 16 cores and an Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, this doesn't seem an illusory goal at all. In addition, there is also a model with the Nvidia RTX 3080 Ti, which promises additional FPS and should be even slightly faster.

With so much performance, the competitors include correspondingly well-equipped gaming laptops such as the MSI GE67 HX 12 UGS or the Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22. Another interesting comparison should be with the externally identical Aorus 17 XE4, which combines the same graphics card with a slightly smaller CPU. You can also find additional details on the case, maintenance, or input devices in the review of the Aorus 17 XE4, since these sections are identical for the Aorus 17X.

Aorus 17X XES (17X Series)
Processor
Intel Core i9-12900HX 16 x 1.7 - 5 GHz, 157 W PL2 / Short Burst, 86 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-HX
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1410 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 130 W TDP ( including 15 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 511.65, Nvidia Advanced Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5-4800, dual channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Sharp SHP1563, IPS, glossy: no, 360 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM670 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, 1024 GB 
, M.2 2280
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-S PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: headset port, Sensors: light
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 30 x 398 x 258 ( = 1.18 x 15.67 x 10.16 in)
Battery
99 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix HD webcam
Additional features
Speakers: stereo 2 x 2.5 W, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Gigabyte Control Center, 280-Watt power supply
Weight
2.74 kg ( = 96.65 oz / 6.04 pounds), Power Supply: 1.03 kg ( = 36.33 oz / 2.27 pounds)
Price
2800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
83.7 %
08/2022
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.7 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.8 %
09/2022
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg31 mm17.30"1920x1080
87.7 %
07/2022
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.5 kg23.4 mm15.60"1920x1080
85.4 %
07/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
87.4 %
06/2022
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.4 kg23.4 mm15.60"3840x2160
88.2 %
05/2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
85.2 %
04/2022
Aorus 17 XE4
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg27 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case - Large cooling system and a lot of plastic in the Aorus 17X

Being large, heavy, and dominated by plastic, the case can be considered pragmatic at best. The display lid could have been a bit more robust, but overall, there are no annoying creaking noises, and you can also open the lid up to 130 degrees using a single hand without any trouble. Considering the heavy base, this is of course not surprising. The white, illuminated Aorus logo is attractive to look at.

Size Comparison

398 mm / 15.7 inch 261 mm / 10.3 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 2.8 kg6.18 lbs398 mm / 15.7 inch 258 mm / 10.2 inch 30 mm / 1.181 inch 2.7 kg6.04 lbs398 mm / 15.7 inch 254 mm / 10 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 2.6 kg5.77 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 2.8 kg6.28 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 267 mm / 10.5 inch 23.4 mm / 0.921 inch 2.5 kg5.44 lbs358 mm / 14.1 inch 267 mm / 10.5 inch 23.4 mm / 0.921 inch 2.4 kg5.37 lbs355 mm / 14 inch 266 mm / 10.5 inch 20.5 mm / 0.807 inch 2.6 kg5.64 lbs

Equipment - Minimal but suitable for a gaming laptop

The amount of connections isn't really abundant. But at least, Thunderbolt 4 ensures fast data transfer. The 2.5-Gigabit LAN port offers a similar advantage, and not only creative professionals should be pleased with the three different video output ports.

Left: 2.5-Gbit LAN, HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-A (5 Gbit/s)
Left: 2.5-Gbit LAN, HDMI, DisplayPort, USB-A (5 Gbit/s)
Right: headset, USB-A (5 Gbit/s), Thunderbolt 4, power
Right: headset, USB-A (5 Gbit/s), Thunderbolt 4, power

Communications

The WLAN module, which slightly surpasses the average transmission rates of gaming laptops, also offers a high bandwidth. But with Wi-Fi 6E, the standard used here is also correspondingly powerful.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1755 (1679min - 1765max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1260 - 1857, n=12, last 2 years)
1620 MBit/s ∼92% -8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (883 - 1857, n=37)
1497 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1461 (1392min - 1501max) MBit/s ∼83% -17%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1648 (1133min - 1711max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (1348 - 1655, n=11, last 2 years)
1533 MBit/s ∼93% -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
  (944 - 1851, n=37)
1402 MBit/s ∼85% -15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1348 (1151min - 1393max) MBit/s ∼82% -18%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1133-1711)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1481 (1314-1543)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1679-1765)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533ZW-LN106WS Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1829 (831-1948)

Webcam

As in the Aorus 17 XE4, the 17X XES also uses a simple HD camera. With its weak resolution, it is just barely suited for video calls. At least, the resulting image is easily recognizable even in bad light conditions, and the color deviations remain within limits.

On the other hand, the dual-array microphone turns out good. Recordings from various directions and distances are reproduced at almost the same volume. Unfortunately, the voices sound very tinny, but at least they are easily understandable.

ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
12 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Aorus 17X XES: 8.89 ∆E min: 3.41 - max: 14.44 ∆E

Input Devices - The gaming keyboard has a colorful illumination

The decent keyboard doesn't offer a large stroke but a comfortable resistance. The frame hardly bends. At least, with the freely configurable RGB illumination, a large selection of function keys, and the full-size number block, there are no reasons for complaint. However, we have to be careful, since the keyboard is minimally smaller than the standard, which can cause some irritation when typing.

Display - Fast but not bright

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid
Hardly any noticeable screen bleeding.
Hardly any noticeable screen bleeding.

The large display with a 17.3-inch diagonal impresses particularly with its refresh rate of 360 Hz. The response times turn out correspondingly short. In addition, there is a decent contrast ratio of more than 1000:1. The high refresh rate is combined with a Full HD resolution.

What is less convincing is the brightness. Even on the desk, the average value of 270 cd/m² seems too low at times, and the illumination lacks power. Considering the weak background illumination, the screen bleeding remains within limits, and we only notice a light halo in the top right corner with extremely dark image content.

To enable the display to adjust automatically to the surroundings, Gigabyte equipped the Aorus 17X with a brightness sensor. While it works reliably, it activates a bit too often for our tastes. Merely creating some shadow by moving the hand in front of it, might lead to an adjustment of the brightness, which is also reported each time.

Nvidia Advanced Optimus, which runs in the background and limits the latencies to a minimum, ensures almost unnoticeable switching between the iGPU and gaming graphics card. This is especially practical for fast and competitive games, but also useful in general. 

295
cd/m²
302
cd/m²
294
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
278
cd/m²
270
cd/m²
253
cd/m²
247
cd/m²
240
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Sharp SHP1563
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 302 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 273 cd/m² Minimum: 6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 278 cd/m²
Contrast: 1069:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.96 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.3, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
71.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.224
Aorus 17X XES
Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung ATNA562P02-0, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.60
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
BOE099D, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
AUO51EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.60
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16.00
Aorus 17 XE4
Sharp LQ173M1JW12, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Display
-14%
-1%
19%
15%
20%
-1%
Display P3 Coverage
70.1
59.03
-16%
71.7
2%
97.5
39%
80.4
15%
98
40%
69
-2%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
87.46
-12%
89.7
-10%
99.9
0%
98.4
-2%
99.9
0%
99.4
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.9
61.04
-15%
75.2
5%
85.2
18%
94.7
32%
86.3
20%
71.2
-1%
Response Times
-192%
93%
-38%
-287%
-163%
-220%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
3.4 ?(1.4, 2)
14 ?(7, 7)
-312%
0.25 ?(0.13, 0.12)
93%
5.4 ?(2.3, 3.1)
-59%
18.8 ?(9.2, 9.6)
-453%
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
-329%
15.2 ?(7.6, 7.6)
-347%
Response Time Black / White *
5.8 ?(2.5, 3.3)
10 ?(6, 4)
-72%
0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)
93%
6.8 ?(2.9, 3.9)
-17%
12.8 ?(6.8, 6)
-121%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
3%
11.2 ?(6.8, 4.4)
-93%
PWM Frequency
100 ?(50)
480.4 ?(100)
Screen
8%
24%
20%
18%
16%
21%
Brightness middle
278
321
15%
356.1
28%
349
26%
351
26%
459
65%
274
-1%
Brightness
273
302
11%
358
31%
319
17%
347
27%
434
59%
267
-2%
Brightness Distribution
79
84
6%
99
25%
83
5%
90
14%
88
11%
82
4%
Black Level *
0.26
0.41
-58%
0.32
-23%
0.35
-35%
0.44
-69%
0.25
4%
Contrast
1069
783
-27%
1091
2%
1003
-6%
1043
-2%
1096
3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.96
1.62
59%
4.83
-22%
2.5
37%
2.54
36%
2.97
25%
2.07
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.78
4.08
62%
7.94
26%
6.87
36%
8.36
22%
8.13
25%
4.89
55%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.07
1.93
-80%
0.64
40%
0.67
37%
1.03
4%
0.83
22%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.8
1.24
82%
3.1
54%
3.9
43%
4.1
40%
4.9
28%
3
56%
Gamma
2.224 99%
2.41 91%
2.2 100%
2.09 105%
2.089 105%
2.235 98%
2.207 100%
CCT
7651 85%
6261 104%
5938 109%
7192 90%
7036 92%
6775 96%
6999 93%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-66% / -26%
39% / 30%
0% / 12%
-85% / -26%
-42% / -9%
-67% / -18%

* ... smaller is better

The color space coverage is optimally targeted for gaming. The sRGB color space can basically be reproduced completely. As expected, the display is only able to cover parts of the AdobeRGB or DCI-P3 color spaces, which are most used for processing media. 

CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Grayscale
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: Saturation
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: ColorChecker
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Grayscale (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN: ColorChecker (calibrated)

The color accuracy in the state of delivery can still be improved. However, you need trained eyes to be able to really notice the DeltaE of barely 4. After the calibration, we measure a DeltaE of only 1, which corresponds to an almost optimal color reproduction. You can download the associated color profile from the link above, at the bottom of the box with the panel values.

Aorus 17X XES vs sRGB
Aorus 17X XES vs sRGB
Aorus 17X XES vs AdobeRGB
Aorus 17X XES vs AdobeRGB
Aorus 17X XES vs P3
Aorus 17X XES vs P3

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 3.3 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.4 ms rise
↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (36.2 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19842 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoors, photos are hardly recognizable, but you can still read text.
Outdoors, photos are hardly recognizable, but you can still read text.

Using the Aorus 17X XES outdoors can hardly be recommended. In direct sunlight, you can hardly recognize anything anymore. Even in the shade or with light from the back, most colors will lack in brightness.

The laptop is still sufficient to use for web surfing or reading in a shady place. However, image processing or gaming can only be recommended indoors.

The viewing angle stability is without fault, but we don't expect anything else from an IPS panel. Even from a steep viewing angle of almost 90°, we do not observe any color changes. Although the brightness is reduced, this doesn't hinder recognition.

Performance - The i9 CPU dominates in the gaming laptop

The hardware equipment proves itself to be sufficient for the Full-HD resolution. All the current and most probably also many future games can be played smoothly on the gaming laptop without any compromises. If you can accept with less details, very high frame rates also become realistic and can be displayed optimally thanks to 360 Hz including variable refresh rates.

In addition, the extremely fast processor with a total of 24 threads in combination with 32 GB of DDR5 RAM also allow using it for demanding computations aside from graphical applications. The computing performance by no means needs to hide from a workstation.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z storage
CPU-Z storage
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

Test Conditions

For all the tests, games, and benchmarks, as well as additional tasks from text and image processing to surfing the Internet, we used the automatic switching of the performance profiles in the Gigabyte Control Center, which is called "Ai Boost." Not only does this adjust the power limits of the CPU, but the color profiles and behavior of the fans or keyboard also change depending on the situation. The table below shows how much power is allocated for the processor.

Overall, the system works reliably, recognizes all the programs, and associates them with the corresponding modes. However, we found the very noticeable change between color profiles that always occurred with some delay a bit annoying. This was noticeable, for example, when closing the browser and starting a writing program that activates the creator mode.

While completely turning off the keyboard illumination when the power plug is pulled from the outlet seems consequent, it still isn't really practical in the evening hours.

Independent from the intelligent control, the performance profiles can also be adjusted individually up to the smallest details, in order to orient them on your own preferences. However, you then need to switch them manually. You can do this via button press, which is also the same way you can adjust the fan profile.

Gaming Mode Creator Mode Turbo Mode Meeting Power Saving
PL1 65 W 86 W 86 W 15 W 15 W
PL2 157 W 157 W 157 W 30 W 30 W

Processor

Copper instead of aluminum for the heat pipes in the Aorus 17X.
Copper instead of aluminum for the heat pipes in the Aorus 17X.

The Intel Core i9-12900HX offers 2 additional Performance cores compared to the i9-12900H. Together with 8 additional Efficiency cores, this results in the ability to handle a total of 24 threads, which becomes noticeable during intense tasks including multi-tasking.

Since only the P cores reach the maximum clock speed of 5.0 GHz, the HX chip offers the same on paper as a AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX in this regard. In the constant load test with Cinebench R15 and also the general CPU performance, it places significantly ahead of the AMD chip. Overall, the i9 leaves most of the competitors significantly behind in terms of the raw performance capabilities, which is not surprising when you consider its impressive equipment. The i9 processors with 6 P cores such as the i9-12900H are also left behind.

In addition, there is a very stable performance in the long run, which considering the high power consumption also points to a very well designed cooling system. After the first run of Cinebench R15, the value doesn't even drop by 4% in the long run. The cooling also represents the only visible external difference to the Aorus 17 XE4. Instead of the black painted cooling fins made from aluminum, you can see the copper of the heat pipes through the fan vent openings.

Our benchmark list provides an overview of the performance of various processors.

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø2729 (2696.14-2830.06)
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 Intel Core i9-12900H: Ø2569 (2512.4-2719.42)
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2467 (2423.65-2668.98)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
 
85.3 pt ∼85%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
79.5 pt ∼80%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
76.8 pt ∼77%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
73.3 pt ∼73%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
73 pt ∼73%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.4 pt ∼68%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
62.8 pt ∼63%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
62.4 pt ∼62%
Average of class Gaming
 
54.3 pt ∼54%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (18337 - 23482, n=8)
22529 Points ∼100% +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
22456 (19998.9min - 22456.2max) Points ∼100% +22%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
18337 Points ∼81%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
17161 Points ∼76% -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
16530 Points ∼73% -10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
16034 Points ∼71% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points ∼63% -23%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23482, n=205, last 2 years)
12796 Points ∼57% -30%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11814 Points ∼52% -36%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1928 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (1897 - 1936, n=8)
1917 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
1911 Points ∼99% -1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1855 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1812 Points ∼94% -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
1811 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1765 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points ∼81% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1936, n=204, last 2 years)
1526 Points ∼79% -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (7037 - 9042, n=8)
8602 Points ∼100% +22%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
8564 Points ∼100% +22%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
7037 Points ∼82%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
6516 Points ∼76% -7%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6271 Points ∼73% -11%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
6150 Points ∼71% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points ∼64% -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
4847 Points ∼56% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 9042, n=224, last 2 years)
4832 Points ∼56% -31%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
740 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (728 - 745, n=8)
738 Points ∼100% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
737 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
717 Points ∼97% -3%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
694 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
692 Points ∼94% -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
676 Points ∼91% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points ∼80% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 745, n=224, last 2 years)
584 Points ∼79% -21%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (2830 - 3652, n=8)
3493 Points ∼100% +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
3383 (3163.31min - 3383.24max) Points ∼97% +20%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
2830 (2696.14min - 2830.06max) Points ∼81%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
2719 (2512.4min - 2719.42max) Points ∼78% -4%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
2670 Points ∼76% -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2669 (2423.65min - 2668.98max) Points ∼76% -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2580 (2349.9min - 2579.98max) Points ∼74% -9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2518 (1886.88min - 2518.1max) Points ∼72% -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points ∼66% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3652, n=226, last 2 years)
2045 Points ∼59% -28%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (274 - 282, n=8)
278 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
276 Points ∼99%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
273 Points ∼98% -1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
267 Points ∼96% -3%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
263 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
260 Points ∼94% -6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points ∼92% -7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
250 Points ∼90% -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 282, n=218, last 2 years)
232 Points ∼83% -16%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1259, n=225, last 2 years)
277 Seconds * ∼100% -38%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
246 Seconds * ∼89% -22%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
234 Seconds * ∼84% -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * ∼79% -9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
201 Seconds * ∼73%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
195.9 Seconds * ∼71% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
189.9 Seconds * ∼69% +6%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (144 - 201, n=8)
154.4 Seconds * ∼56% +23%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
153.1 Seconds * ∼55% +24%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (69778 - 88128, n=7)
84614 MIPS ∼100% +21%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
76947 MIPS ∼91% +10%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
69778 MIPS ∼82%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
69083 MIPS ∼82% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
65743 MIPS ∼78% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS ∼76% -8%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
57987 MIPS ∼69% -17%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
55958 MIPS ∼66% -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=222, last 2 years)
53394 MIPS ∼63% -23%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6343 MIPS ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (6165 - 6358, n=7)
6293 MIPS ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
6041 MIPS ∼95% -5%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
5981 MIPS ∼94% -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
5851 MIPS ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5818 MIPS ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS ∼90% -10%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
5624 MIPS ∼89% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=222, last 2 years)
5523 MIPS ∼87% -13%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (15116 - 16925, n=8)
16247 Points ∼100% +7%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
15116 Points ∼93%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
14213 Points ∼87% -6%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13722 Points ∼84% -9%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
12261 Points ∼75% -19%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
12096 Points ∼74% -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11626 Points ∼72% -23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points ∼63% -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=216, last 2 years)
9281 Points ∼57% -39%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (1874 - 1949, n=8)
1909 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1902 Points ∼100%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1861 Points ∼97% -2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
1856 Points ∼97% -2%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
1781 Points ∼93% -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
1759 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1749 Points ∼92% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points ∼83% -16%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=216, last 2 years)
1531 Points ∼80% -20%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (19.6 - 26.6, n=7)
25 fps ∼100% +28%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
24.9 fps ∼100% +27%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
19.6 fps ∼78%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
19.1 fps ∼76% -3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.4 fps ∼74% -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps ∼72% -8%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
16.3 fps ∼65% -17%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=226, last 2 years)
14.9 fps ∼60% -24%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.6 fps ∼58% -26%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 332, n=220, last 2 years)
52.2 s * ∼100% -38%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * ∼86% -19%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
43.5 s * ∼83% -15%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
42 s * ∼80% -11%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
38.5 s * ∼74% -2%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
37.7 s * ∼72%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (33.6 - 42.4, n=7)
37.4 s * ∼72% +1%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
36.4 s * ∼70% +3%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
36.3 s * ∼70% +4%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=221, last 2 years)
0.544 sec * ∼100% -31%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * ∼88% -15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4659 sec * ∼86% -12%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX
0.459 sec * ∼84% -10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4534 sec * ∼83% -9%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4392 sec * ∼81% -6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H
0.437 sec * ∼80% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (0.4159 - 0.4242, n=7)
0.4211 sec * ∼77% -1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4159 sec * ∼76%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2830 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
236 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
276 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
 
96.9 pt ∼97%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86.7 pt ∼87%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
80.7 pt ∼81%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 pt ∼78%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
73.7 pt ∼74%
Average of class Gaming
 
64.8 pt ∼65%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.6 pt ∼64%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61.1 pt ∼61%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53.4 pt ∼53%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (11535 - 22183, n=7)
19240 KRay/s ∼100% +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16852 KRay/s ∼88% +10%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15255 KRay/s ∼79%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15078 KRay/s ∼78% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 22183, n=184, last 2 years)
11915 KRay/s ∼62% -22%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
11088 KRay/s ∼58% -27%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8573 KRay/s ∼45% -44%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8538 KRay/s ∼44% -44%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7233 KRay/s ∼38% -53%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103794 Points ∼100% +32%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (52916 - 110093, n=7)
96060 Points ∼93% +23%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78356 Points ∼75%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
75435 Points ∼73% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=184, last 2 years)
64453 Points ∼62% -18%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49654 Points ∼48% -37%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38656 Points ∼37% -51%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38396 Points ∼37% -51%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34372 Points ∼33% -56%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (3559 - 5123, n=7)
4698 MB/s ∼100% +32%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3977 MB/s ∼85% +12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3791 MB/s ∼81% +7%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3559 MB/s ∼76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3547 MB/s ∼76% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3043 MB/s ∼65% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=184, last 2 years)
3034 MB/s ∼65% -15%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2992 MB/s ∼64% -16%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2525 MB/s ∼54% -29%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107024 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
105314 Points ∼98% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104920 Points ∼98% 0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104457 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (101029 - 104457, n=7)
102903 Points ∼96% -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102833 Points ∼96% -2%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99702 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 132615, n=184, last 2 years)
92009 Points ∼86% -12%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91366 Points ∼85% -13%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12955 Points ∼100% +24%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (10475 - 13062, n=7)
12627 Points ∼97% +21%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
12303 Points ∼95% +17%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10475 Points ∼81%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=184, last 2 years)
10158 Points ∼78% -3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9687 Points ∼75% -8%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9652 Points ∼75% -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9634 Points ∼74% -8%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8783 Points ∼68% -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points ∼100% +47%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (31779 - 53628, n=7)
47917 Points ∼84% +23%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39016 Points ∼68%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
37158 Points ∼65% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=184, last 2 years)
35281 Points ∼62% -10%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
31771 Points ∼55% -19%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23188 Points ∼40% -41%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
23070 Points ∼40% -41%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
19904 Points ∼35% -49%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (125268 - 183146, n=7)
166223 MB/s ∼100% +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
139407 MB/s ∼84% +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
136241 MB/s ∼82% +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134645 MB/s ∼81%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
117708 MB/s ∼71% -13%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95195 MB/s ∼57% -29%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95126 MB/s ∼57% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 183146, n=184, last 2 years)
90380 MB/s ∼54% -33%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
81335 MB/s ∼49% -40%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1351 MB/s ∼100% +36%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (990 - 1408, n=7)
1336 MB/s ∼99% +35%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1056 MB/s ∼78% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1048 MB/s ∼78% +6%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1004 MB/s ∼74% +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
990 MB/s ∼73%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
890 MB/s ∼66% -10%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
875 MB/s ∼65% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1408, n=205, last 2 years)
743 MB/s ∼55% -25%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (6663 - 11913, n=7)
10470 KRay/s ∼100% +23%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9001 KRay/s ∼86% +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8518 KRay/s ∼81%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7989 KRay/s ∼76% -6%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
6675 KRay/s ∼64% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11913, n=184, last 2 years)
6474 KRay/s ∼62% -24%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4940 KRay/s ∼47% -42%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4924 KRay/s ∼47% -42%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4160 KRay/s ∼40% -51%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (40239 - 47710, n=7)
42604 MPixel/s ∼100% +5%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40648 MPixel/s ∼95% +1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40386 MPixel/s ∼95%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34944 MPixel/s ∼82% -13%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
32445 MPixel/s ∼76% -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
29705 MPixel/s ∼70% -26%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
28692 MPixel/s ∼67% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 47710, n=184, last 2 years)
26413 MPixel/s ∼62% -35%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
25893 MPixel/s ∼61% -36%

System Performance

Considering the processor used, we almost expected the excellent performance of the Aorus 17X in terms of the system performance. The laptop is clearly able to move ahead of the average of gaming laptops we tested, in some parts even by more than 20%. It almost always places ahead of the Aorus 17 XE4, which is not very surprising considering the lower processor performance of that system. Only the MSI Raider GE66 12UHS with the overclocked Intel Core i9-12900HK is able to achieve even better values almost throughout.

The performance capabilities can be clearly felt during almost every application startup, and we can hardly, if at all, observe any delays. Even running several applications in parallel does not lead to any hindrances, which is also due to the large and fast working memory. The use of virtual scenarios therefore also appears completely realistic.

In battery operation, which forces using the Power Saving mode, not much is left of the high performance, and the result in PCMark10 then reaches only one third of the best value.

PCMark10 in Ai Boost mode
PCMark10 in Ai Boost mode
PCMark10 in Power Saving mode
PCMark10 in Power Saving mode
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8178 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8042 Points ∼98% +2%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7899 Points ∼97%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
7899 Points ∼97% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7812 Points ∼96% -1%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7700 Points ∼94% -3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7357 Points ∼90% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 8636, n=179, last 2 years)
6854 Points ∼84% -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points ∼78% -20%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
11078 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10919 Points ∼99% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10814 Points ∼98% +2%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10765 Points ∼97% +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10646 Points ∼96% +1%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10589 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
10589 Points ∼96% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 11205, n=178, last 2 years)
10059 Points ∼91% -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points ∼85% -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10422 Points ∼100% +2%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10237 Points ∼98%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
10237 Points ∼98% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10197 Points ∼98% 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10023 Points ∼96% -2%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
9820 Points ∼94% -4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9279 Points ∼89% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10932, n=178, last 2 years)
9045 Points ∼87% -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points ∼74% -25%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
12897 Points ∼100% +4%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12857 Points ∼100% +4%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
12342 Points ∼96%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
12342 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
11732 Points ∼91% -5%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
11721 Points ∼91% -5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10938 Points ∼85% -11%
Average of class Gaming
  (4716 - 14291, n=178, last 2 years)
9691 Points ∼75% -21%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points ∼75% -22%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2155 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2155 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2000 Points ∼93% -7%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1973 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1833 Points ∼85% -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2170, n=50, last 2 years)
1791 Points ∼83% -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points ∼79% -21%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2030 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2030 Points ∼100% 0%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1962 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1874 Points ∼92% -8%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1741 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=50, last 2 years)
1731 Points ∼85% -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points ∼84% -16%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2304 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2304 Points ∼100% 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2089 Points ∼91% -9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2012 Points ∼87% -13%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1992 Points ∼86% -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2366, n=50, last 2 years)
1891 Points ∼82% -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points ∼75% -25%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2142 Points ∼100% +1%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2113 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
 
2113 Points ∼99% 0%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1941 Points ∼91% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points ∼80% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=50, last 2 years)
1702 Points ∼79% -19%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1613 Points ∼75% -24%
PCMark 10 Score
7899 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (62852 - 70863, n=7)
65526 MB/s ∼100% +4%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62959 MB/s ∼96% 0%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62852 MB/s ∼96%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s ∼81% -15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53008 MB/s ∼81% -16%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
49810 MB/s ∼76% -21%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
47278 MB/s ∼72% -25%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=184, last 2 years)
46173 MB/s ∼70% -27%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
45062 MB/s ∼69% -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68051 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (62140 - 72930, n=7)
67115 MB/s ∼99% -1%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66798 MB/s ∼98% -2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59935 MB/s ∼88% -12%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57329 MB/s ∼84% -16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53321 MB/s ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=184, last 2 years)
49722 MB/s ∼73% -27%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
48780 MB/s ∼72% -28%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46179 MB/s ∼68% -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65001 MB/s ∼100% +8%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (60001 - 68782, n=7)
62827 MB/s ∼97% +5%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60001 MB/s ∼92%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58827 MB/s ∼91% -2%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
57764 MB/s ∼89% -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57180 MB/s ∼88% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=184, last 2 years)
47497 MB/s ∼73% -21%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
46677 MB/s ∼72% -22%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
44515 MB/s ∼68% -26%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.8 ns * ∼100% -16%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Intel Core i7-12800HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
95.7 ns * ∼95% -10%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93.7 ns * ∼93% -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.3 ns * ∼92% -6%
Aorus 17 XE4
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
91.7 ns * ∼91% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Intel Core i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91.2 ns * ∼90% -5%
Average Intel Core i9-12900HX
  (83.9 - 93.4, n=7)
87.9 ns * ∼87% -1%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 ns * ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 122, n=206, last 2 years)
63.5 ns * ∼63% +27%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

In the evaluation of latencies when running programs, the laptop is unable to impress us fully. To evaluate this, we open several pages in the default browser and then play a Youtube video in 4K resolution and run Prime95. This results in a maximum delay of barely more than 1 ms. This value is limited and in some instances significantly lower than those of the competitors. However, the Aorus 17X XES is still not suited for real-time audio and video processing with this.

The 4K video reproduction gives solid but not perfect results. The demand on the processor is not very high, and after completing the video, only 3 frames were dropped of a total of 3,500 single frames.

LatencyMon main page
LatencyMon main page
LatencyMon list of drivers
LatencyMon list of drivers
YouTube video at 4K
YouTube video at 4K
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9988 μs * ∼100% -796%
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5785 μs * ∼58% -419%
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1698.6 μs * ∼17% -52%
Aorus 17 XE4
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1681 μs * ∼17% -51%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1115 μs * ∼11%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
903 μs * ∼9% +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * ∼5% +53%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

The Gigabyte M.2 SSD used does not show any weaknesses. Even during the load test, which is particularly meant to show whether the heat development is too high, the maximum performance remains constant. The capabilities of the PCIe 4.0 connection are used to the full extent. 

Among the other competitors, the Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22 shows how things shouldn't be done, since there is throttling already after a short time period.

Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Sequential Read: 5715MB/s
Sequential Write: 3218MB/s
4K Read: 94.04MB/s
4K Write: 256.3MB/s
4K-64 Read: 2963MB/s
4K-64 Write: 3299MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.085ms
Access Time Write: 0.014ms
Score Read: 3629Points
Score Write: 3877Points
Score Total: 9242Points
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Schenker XMG Pro 17 E22
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
MSI Raider GE66 12UHS
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
Aorus 17 XE4
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Drive Performance Rating
Percent
76.9
55.5
-28%
76.6
0%
73.7
-4%
77.7
1%
77
0%
79.4
3%
78.2
2%
48.3
-37%
DiskSpd
-25%
3%
-4%
-2%
24%
-6%
-3%
-34%
seq read
3871
3605
-7%
3929
1%
3141
-19%
3813
-1%
4903
27%
3631
-6%
3751 ?(3631 - 3871, n=2)
-3%
2661 ?(170 - 5544, n=175, last 2 years)
-31%
seq write
4224
3593
-15%
4063
-4%
3391
-20%
3838
-9%
7889
87%
2200
-48%
3212 ?(2200 - 4224, n=2)
-24%
2877 ?(174 - 7889, n=174, last 2 years)
-32%
seq q8 t1 read
6921
6799
-2%
6683
-3%
6766
-2%
5358
-23%
10557
53%
7034
2%
6978 ?(6921 - 7034, n=2)
1%
4465 ?(144 - 13195, n=175, last 2 years)
-35%
seq q8 t1 write
4852
5199
7%
4985
3%
4993
3%
4951
2%
9830
103%
3611
-26%
4232 ?(3611 - 4852, n=2)
-13%
3474 ?(86.2 - 10203, n=175, last 2 years)
-28%
4k q1 t1 read
74.1
77
4%
93
26%
67.2
-9%
88.3
19%
73.1
-1%
88.8
20%
81.5 ?(74.1 - 88.8, n=2)
10%
60.3 ?(0.53 - 97.4, n=175, last 2 years)
-19%
4k q1 t1 write
319
205
-36%
275
-14%
279
-13%
273
-14%
359
13%
356
12%
338 ?(319 - 356, n=2)
6%
187 ?(0.79 - 421, n=174, last 2 years)
-41%
4k q32 t16 read
3564
1274
-64%
4176
17%
4260
20%
4068
14%
2390
-33%
3582
1%
3573 ?(3564 - 3582, n=2)
0%
2075 ?(1.1 - 4483, n=174, last 2 years)
-42%
4k q32 t16 write
3570
553
-85%
3491
-2%
3961
11%
3478
-3%
1542
-57%
3604
1%
3587 ?(3570 - 3604, n=2)
0%
1944 ?(1.15 - 4383, n=174, last 2 years)
-46%
AS SSD
-25%
-21%
-6%
1%
0%
7%
3%
-57%
Score Total
9242
5693
-38%
8980
-3%
9047
-2%
8959
-3%
6635
-28%
9279
0%
9261 ?(9242 - 9279, n=2)
0%
5815 ?(910 - 9279, n=165, last 2 years)
-37%
Score Read
3629
1898
-48%
3469
-4%
3276
-10%
3341
-8%
2619
-28%
3549
-2%
3589 ?(3549 - 3629, n=2)
-1%
2181 ?(389 - 3629, n=165, last 2 years)
-40%
Score Write
3877
2955
-24%
3799
-2%
4151
7%
3977
3%
2556
-34%
3996
3%
3937 ?(3877 - 3996, n=2)
2%
2548 ?(335 - 4459, n=165, last 2 years)
-34%
Seq Read
5715
5233.79
-8%
5282.63
-8%
4559
-20%
5098.97
-11%
5344.88
-6%
5031
-12%
5373 ?(5031 - 5715, n=2)
-6%
3645 ?(252 - 9681, n=165, last 2 years)
-36%
Seq Write
3218
2355.42
-27%
3975.65
24%
3548
10%
3667.77
14%
7663.27
138%
3162
-2%
3190 ?(3162 - 3218, n=2)
-1%
2735 ?(308 - 8206, n=165, last 2 years)
-15%
4K Read
94.04
68.25
-27%
86.37
-8%
63.1
-33%
84.06
-11%
68.93
-27%
108
15%
101 ?(94 - 108, n=2)
7%
58.8 ?(20 - 108, n=165, last 2 years)
-37%
4K Write
256.3
224.32
-12%
240.81
-6%
254.1
-1%
244.47
-5%
328.69
28%
308.6
20%
282 ?(256 - 309, n=2)
10%
165.1 ?(18 - 364, n=165, last 2 years)
-36%
4K-64 Read
2963
1306.59
-56%
2854.25
-4%
2757
-7%
2747.2
-7%
2015.68
-32%
2938
-1%
2951 ?(2938 - 2963, n=2)
0%
1758 ?(216 - 2963, n=165, last 2 years)
-41%
4K-64 Write
3299
2495.32
-24%
3160.56
-4%
3543
7%
3365.94
2%
1460.96
-56%
3371
2%
3335 ?(3299 - 3371, n=2)
1%
2121 ?(191.8 - 3950, n=165, last 2 years)
-36%
Access Time Read *
0.085
0.078
8%
0.029
66%
0.073
14%
0.032
62%
0.053
38%
0.048
44%
0.0665 ?(0.048 - 0.085, n=2)
22%
0.06177 ?(0.018 - 0.23, n=160, last 2 years)
27%
Access Time Write *
0.014
0.017
-21%
0.054
-286%
0.018
-29%
0.018
-29%
0.013
7%
0.013
7%
0.0135 ?(0.013 - 0.014, n=2)
4%
0.0624 ?(0.012 - 0.588, n=165, last 2 years)
-346%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-26% / -25%
-6% / -11%
-5% / -5%
0% / -0%
8% / 10%
1% / 2%
1% / 1%
-43% / -47%

* ... smaller is better

Constant Performance Reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

035070010501400175021002450280031503500385042004550490052505600595063006650