Notebookcheck Logo

HP Omen 17 (2022) gaming laptop in review: Stylish case and hardware with lots of potential

Auspicious power is not the case with the HP Omen 17. The gaming laptop fully utilizes its potential regarding the TDP and TGP of the Intel Core i7 12700H and the Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti. But gamers can also do things differently: if energy-saving settings are set correctly, the energy-hungry gamer becomes a meek, lamb-like laptop with a useful battery life.

For several years, HP has been successfully marketing the Omen series as strong gaming laptops with an appealing design and excellent build quality. However, the manufacturer also charges quite high prices. Buyers currently have to fork out over 2,000 Euros (~US$ 2000) for the current Omen 17.

A selection of strong hardware components in the HP Omen 17 ensures very strong performance in the processor benchmarks. The 2022 version of the gaming laptop now makes use of an Intel Core i7-12700H from the latest processor generation, which is accompanied by 16 GB DDR5 RAM and a 1 TB NVMe SSD from Western Digital. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in our second review sample also performs well. Our first review sample had to be replaced by HP due to a graphics card defect. Overall, the 17-inch Omen often outperforms the strong HP Omen 16 with the same hardware.

Other comparable gamers are the MSI Vector GP76 12UGS, the Asus TUF Gaming F17 and the much cheaper Acer Nitro 5 with an AMD processor. 

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng (Omen 17-ck Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 106 W PL2 / Short Burst, 75 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-P
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU - 8 GB VRAM, 135 W TDP
Memory
16 GB 
, 2x 8GB DDR5 SODIMM
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE09EE, IPS, glossy: no, 144 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
WDC PC SN810 1TB, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 4 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset, Card Reader: SD
Networking
Realtek Semiconductor RTL8168/8111 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet NIC (10/100/1000MBit/s), MediaTek MT7921 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 31 x 398 x 261 ( = 1.22 x 15.67 x 10.28 in)
Battery
78 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: 0.9
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Cicklett, Keyboard Light: yes, Alexa, ExpressVPN (30 days trail version), LastPass (30 days trail version), McAfee (30 days trail version), Microsoft 365 (30 days trail version), HP Omen Gaming HUB, HP Support Assistent, HP QuickDrop, myHP, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.801 kg ( = 98.8 oz / 6.18 pounds), Power Supply: 1.27 kg ( = 44.8 oz / 2.8 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors in Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.3 %
09/2022
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.8 kg31 mm17.30"1920x1080
83.7 %
08/2022
Aorus 17X XES
i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.7 kg30 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.7 %
05/2022
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.9 kg25.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
84.1 %
04/2022
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg25 mm17.30"1920x1080
81.3 %
08/2021
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.7 kg24.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
89.4 %
09/2021
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"1920x1080
85.5 %
05/2022
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm16.10"2560x1440

Case - Unchanged in design

Black plastic and some black-painted metal are used for the case of the HP Omen. The Omen logo on the display lid is the only eye-catching spot of color. Otherwise, the laptop's design has been kept simple. Straight lines with few decorations make up the exterior of the gaming notebook. Nothing has changed in the design since last year. Even the otherwise typical large openings for fans are inconspicuous here. HP manages to make the laptop look much less larger than it is thanks to Swiss edges and other optical tricks. In return, it almost seems to hover above the surface. 

When opened, a decent keyboard with switchable RGB lighting is revealed. Above this is an interesting triangle pattern, which seems to have no function at all. Otherwise, a large O17 lettering catches our attention. The laptop stands securely on large rubber feet on the underside.

The display lid and base underside are made of plastic. The upper side of the notebook with the keyboard and touchpad is made of metal. A positive aspect here is that the palm rests remain cool even under heavy load. Despite its size, the screen can be opened up to 150° with one hand. HP has done a good job with the hinges because the screen position remains stable, even when the laptop is subject to shaking. 

The size and weight of the HP notebook are typical for gaming laptops. Together, the laptop and power adapter weigh more than 4 kg. At best, it looks a little slimmer than many of its rivals.

Size Comparison

398 mm / 15.7 inch 261 mm / 10.3 inch 31 mm / 1.22 inch 2.8 kg6.18 lbs403.5 mm / 15.9 inch 280 mm / 11 inch 24.9 mm / 0.98 inch 2.7 kg5.95 lbs398 mm / 15.7 inch 258 mm / 10.2 inch 30 mm / 1.181 inch 2.7 kg6.04 lbs397 mm / 15.6 inch 284 mm / 11.2 inch 25.9 mm / 1.02 inch 2.9 kg6.28 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 25 mm / 0.984 inch 2.5 kg5.54 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 260 mm / 10.2 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.06 lbs369 mm / 14.5 inch 248 mm / 9.76 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.3 kg5.05 lbs

Equipment - All connections on the sides

The connectivity on HP's gaming laptop is relatively normal for gamers, although an SD card reader with good speed surprised us here. All ports are located on the sides of the notebook. However, if you connect a wired mouse or other hardware on the right side, you should be careful not to block the ventilation slot.

DC input, RJ45 GigabitLAN, USB 3.2 Type A Gen 1 (always on), mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, USB Type-C with Thunderbolt 4 and DisplayPort, 3.5 mm headphone/microphone combo jack, SD card reader
DC input, RJ45 GigabitLAN, USB 3.2 Type A Gen 1 (always on), mini DisplayPort, HDMI 2.1, USB Type-C with Thunderbolt 4 and DisplayPort, 3.5 mm headphone/microphone combo jack, SD card reader
2 x USB 3.2 Typ A Gen 1
2 x USB 3.2 Typ A Gen 1

SD Card Reader

The AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 reference card reaches significantly higher transfer speeds on many laptops. But it is nonetheless possible to work with a read rate of more than 100 MB/s.

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
208.9 MB/s ∼100% +107%
Average of class Gaming
  (18.5 - 222, n=86, last 2 years)
112.8 MB/s ∼54% +12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
100.9 MB/s ∼48%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
71.63 MB/s ∼34% -29%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 M22
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
69 MB/s ∼33% -32%
MSI Titan GT77 12UHS
Intel Core i9-12900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
59 MB/s ∼28% -42%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV Pro V60)
190.1 MB/s ∼100% +109%
Average of class Gaming
  (20.5 - 263, n=75, last 2 years)
136.6 MB/s ∼72% +50%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
91.1 MB/s ∼48%
Lenovo Legion Slim 7-16IAH 82TF004YGE
Intel Core i7-12700H
88.65 MB/s ∼47% -3%

Communication

MediaTek MT7921 glued under a heat pipe
MediaTek MT7921 glued under a heat pipe

The HP Omen 17 uses the MediaTek MT7921 for wireless communication. This module supports WLAN 6 and Bluetooth 5.2. In combination with the Netgear Nighthawk AX12, the rates for data transmission are unfortunately not as high as those of other laptops. Then again, above 880 MBit/s in receive and transmit direction is not a bad rate either. The positioning of the WLAN module may become problematic in the long run, as it is located under the heatpipes between the cooler and the graphics chip. It is even fixed there with an adhesive pad, so it could get quite warm during use. In the long run, this may also cause connection problems. 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1364 (756min - 1486max) MBit/s ∼100% +54%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1239 (1143min - 1322max) MBit/s ∼91% +40%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=108, last 2 years)
1164 MBit/s ∼85% +32%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
MediaTek MT7921
885 (808min - 986max) MBit/s ∼65%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
MediaTek MT7921
845 (560min - 969max) MBit/s ∼62% -5%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (548 - 985, n=16)
797 MBit/s ∼58% -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
450 (211min - 459max) MBit/s ∼33% -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1623 (1min - 1710max) MBit/s ∼100% +84%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1491 (1415min - 1540max) MBit/s ∼92% +69%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=108, last 2 years)
1209 MBit/s ∼74% +37%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
MediaTek MT7921
881 (818min - 900max) MBit/s ∼54%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (90 - 972, n=16)
628 MBit/s ∼39% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
423 MBit/s ∼26% -52%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
MediaTek MT7921
140 (33min - 562max) MBit/s ∼9% -84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1755 (1679min - 1765max) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (886 - 1857, n=22, last 2 years)
1547 MBit/s ∼88%
Average MediaTek MT7921
  (609 - 1245, n=5)
894 MBit/s ∼51%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1133-1711)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1755 (1679-1765)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø881 (818-900)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1624 (1355-1710)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12: Ø422 (403-429)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø139.8 (33-562)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1491 (1415-1540)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø885 (808-986)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1347 (1078-1486)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø441 (211-459)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø845 (560-969)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1239 (1143-1322)

Webcam

Even though the image quality of the built-in camera is sharp and rich in contrast in good ambient light, the webcam is hardly suitable for streamers. In darker rooms, it hardly stands a chance of delivering reasonably good image quality.

ColorChecker
4.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
14.8 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
15.9 ∆E
12 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
ColorChecker HP Omen 17-ck1075ng: 10.37 ∆E min: 2.28 - max: 17.41 ∆E

Security

Users won't find anything more than the security features of the Intel Core i7, such as TPM 2.0 and SecureBoot, in this gaming notebook.

Accessories

Scope of delivery only includes the usual documents and the large 350 W power adapter.

Maintenance

The HP Omen 17 is relatively easy to open and there are many modular components inside. A free NVMe SSD slot is available here. A corresponding heat spreader and a thermal pad have already been pre-installed. However, the replacement of the WLAN module may be problematic. As previously mentioned, it is located underneath the heatpipes and is held in place by an adhesive pad.

HP Omen 17 opened
HP Omen 17 opened

Warranty

HP offers a 24-month warranty for the HP Omen 17 in Europe. This may differ in other regions, so you should check with your supplier before buying.

Input Devices - RGB keyboard

Keyboard

While a 17-inch laptop has room for a full keyboard, HP has omitted the Numpad here to make more room for the arrow keys and some macro keys (P1 to P6) and to give the key blocks good spacing. The RGB-illuminated keyboard is very haptically pleasing thanks to a clear key travel of over one millimeter and crisp feedback. For Europeans, who are used to the ISO layout, the ANSI layout of the keyboard might be quite unusual. On the other hand, gamers who mainly use mechanical keyboards should quickly feel at home here.

The WASD keys, among others, can be visually highlighted with the four controllable areas of the RGB lighting. Gamers are likely to be pleased about this. The keyboard's illumination and the assignment of the macro keys can be controlled via the Omen Center. Static and dynamic modes are available for the lighting. Another interesting aspect is that the color and brightness of the keyboard illumination can be adjusted to the screen content. This results in an effect that is somewhat reminiscent of the Ambilight system. This function is only available in Light Studio.

HP Omen lighting
HP Omen lighting
HP Omen Light Studio
HP Omen Light Studio

Touchpad

The clickpad responds to every input with a rich clicking sound. It is precise and responsive. The size and position of the clickpad are also pleasing. 

Input devices of the HP Omen 17
Input devices of the HP Omen 17

Display - 144 Hz but not particularly responsive

Screen bleeding on the HP Omen 17
Screen bleeding on the HP Omen 17
Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The IPS-grade display of the HP Omen 17, with Full HD resolution and a brightness level of just 302 cd/m², falls more in the middle class. Thanks to the matte surface, there are at least no reflections that would otherwise disturb the gaming experience. We determined the contrast ratio to be only 892:1. The black value is relatively high at 0.36 cd/m². 

No brightness differences on the display are visible to the naked eye. Only the camera can detect clear halos on the screen, albeit only after long exposure.

The screen's response times do not quite correspond to what we expect from a gaming laptop. Demanding gamers in particular are likely to notice clear streaks during rapid image changes.  

However, competing gaming laptops do not fare any better here. Both the Asus TUF Gaming and the Acer Nitro 5 use screens in their 17-inch variants that mostly have significantly worse rates.

315
cd/m²
312
cd/m²
303
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
271
cd/m²
300
cd/m²
316
cd/m²
287
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE09EE
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 302 cd/m² Minimum: 16 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 313 cd/m²
Contrast: 783:1 (Black: 0.41 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.62 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2, calibrated: 1.93
ΔE Greyscale 1.24 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
61.04% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.46% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.03% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.41
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Aorus 17X XES
Sharp SHP1563, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
AUO B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
AU Optronics B173HAN04.9 (AUO4B9D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
BOE NV173FHM-NX4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
BOE09E5, IPS, 2560x1440, 16.10
Display
17%
16%
-32%
-38%
18%
17%
Display P3 Coverage
59.03
70.1
19%
70.09
19%
40.2
-32%
36.7
-38%
71.7
21%
71
20%
sRGB Coverage
87.46
99.9
14%
98.98
13%
59.7
-32%
55.3
-37%
98.8
13%
97.9
12%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.04
71.9
18%
70.91
16%
41.5
-32%
37.9
-38%
73.6
21%
73.3
20%
Response Times
59%
46%
-188%
-35%
41%
1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14 ?(7, 7)
3.4 ?(1.4, 2)
76%
4 ?(1, 3)
71%
39.2 ?(18.2, 21)
-180%
18 ?(8, 10)
-29%
4.2 ?(1.6, 2.6)
70%
14.5 ?(7.2, 7.3)
-4%
Response Time Black / White *
10 ?(6, 4)
5.8 ?(2.5, 3.3)
42%
8 ?(4, 4)
20%
29.6 ?(15.4, 14.2)
-196%
14 ?(7, 7)
-40%
8.8 ?(4.4, 4.4)
12%
9.4 ?(4.4, 5)
6%
PWM Frequency
100 ?(50)
Screen
-74%
-22%
-64%
-93%
-89%
-70%
Brightness middle
321
278
-13%
274
-15%
287
-11%
282
-12%
323.3
1%
335
4%
Brightness
302
273
-10%
264
-13%
268
-11%
255
-16%
315
4%
319
6%
Brightness Distribution
84
79
-6%
87
4%
89
6%
85
1%
91
8%
90
7%
Black Level *
0.41
0.26
37%
0.25
39%
0.17
59%
0.24
41%
0.33
20%
0.28
32%
Contrast
783
1069
37%
1096
40%
1688
116%
1175
50%
980
25%
1196
53%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.62
3.96
-144%
2.53
-56%
5.1
-215%
5.91
-265%
4.59
-183%
4.38
-170%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.08
10.78
-164%
6.76
-66%
8.72
-114%
10.98
-169%
10.82
-165%
9.48
-132%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.93
1.07
45%
0.98
49%
5.1
-164%
1.4
27%
1.33
31%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.24
6.8
-448%
3.49
-181%
4.24
-242%
5.85
-372%
7.9
-537%
7
-465%
Gamma
2.41 91%
2.224 99%
2.31 95%
2.44 90%
2.32 95%
2.28 96%
2.103 105%
CCT
6261 104%
7651 85%
6714 97%
6008 108%
7372 88%
5941 109%
6244 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
35
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
55
Total Average (Program / Settings)
1% / -36%
13% / -4%
-95% / -75%
-55% / -71%
-10% / -47%
-17% / -41%

* ... smaller is better

The displayable color space of the HP Omen 17 is not exactly high at only 87.46% sRGB. This may be sufficient for games and office applications, but artists might want more.

HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. sRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. adobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. adobeRGB
HP Omen 17 vs. DisplayP3
HP Omen 17 vs. DisplayP3

Calibrated, the screen of the HP Omen 17 shows a fairly small color deviation. If you have the same configuration, you can reduce the color deviations considerably using the color profile in the info box. The color deviation falls from a deltaE 6.41 to 1.93, which is below a perceptible value. 

CalMan colors
CalMan colors
CalMan colors calibrated
CalMan colors calibrated
CalMan grayscale
CalMan grayscale
CalMan grayscale calibrated
CalMan grayscale calibrated
CalMan saturation
CalMan saturation
CalMan saturation calibrated
CalMan saturation calibrated

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 7 ms rise
↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 17 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 100 Hz ≤ 50 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 100 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 100 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19590 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

The display's backlight is somewhat weak in direct sunlight. But it is still possible to work with the laptop in bright sunshine with the right viewing angle.

HP Omen 17 with the sun from behind
HP Omen 17 with the sun from behind
HP Omen 17 against the sun
HP Omen 17 against the sun

The screen of the gaming laptop is not particularly stable in terms of viewing angles. Although there are no significant color deviations at steeper viewing angles, there are strong changes in perceptible brightness.

Viewing angle analysis of the HP Omen 17
Viewing angle analysis of the HP Omen 17

Performance - HP laptop with slightly above-average graphics performance

The hardware of the HP Omen 17 is clearly designed for PC gaming. The Nvidia GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and the Intel Core i7 12700H ensure strong performance here. The processor is supported by 16 GB of DDR5 working memory. The NVMe SSD from Western Digital is also large enough to hold a few games with 1 TB.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
CPU-Z: mainboard
CPU-Z: mainboard
CPU-Z: RAM
CPU-Z: RAM
CPU-Z: RAM slot 1
CPU-Z: RAM slot 1
CPU-Z: graphics
CPU-Z: graphics
CPU-Z: graphics
CPU-Z: graphics
CPU-Z: benchmarks
CPU-Z: benchmarks
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
HWinfo
HWinfo
 
 
 

Testing Conditions

Power control of the HP Omen 17
Power control of the HP Omen 17

The power control of the HP Omen 17 has been kept relatively plain, but can also be strongly customized. the profile Balanced was selected for the benchmarks in the areas of system performance, CPU performance, DPC latencies and SSD performance. Tests on GPU performance and gaming were carried out in Performance mode. Different performance modes were also tested for the volume and energy measurements.

In Balanced- and Performance mode, the CPU's boost power is 100 watts and that of the GPU 135 watts. In Balanced mode, the processor operates constantly at around 45 watts, and in Performance mode at around 75 watts. 

Processor

Log Analysis Cinebench R15 Loop: blue - Battery; green - Balanced; red - Performance
Log Analysis Cinebench R15 Loop: blue - Battery; green - Balanced; red - Performance

The Intel Core i7-12700H belongs to the high-end chips of the current Alder Lake generation, consisting of six performance and eight efficiency cores for a total of 20 threads. In Performance mode, PL1, at 75 watts, is well above the usual values of 45 watts. In testing, with 25 runs of the Cinebench R15 benchmark, the log analysis shows clearly different results for the various performance profiles and battery mode. The i7 manages four runs in a row on Boost power (as long as Performance mode is activated) before rapidly falling to 75 watts of continuous output. Balanced mode allows for a sustained output of 45 watts, meaning that Performance mode achieves 490 points more. PL1 and PL2 are severely restricted in battery mode. Here the processor only has 35 and 25 watts at its disposal, respectively.

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

01452904355807258701015116013051450159517401885203021752320246526102755Tooltip
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)
Aorus 17X XES Intel Core i9-12900HX: Ø2729 (2696.14-2830.06)
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2353 (2287.54-2805.84)
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø1955 (1902.5-2820.28)
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø2006 (1963-2025.09)
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1865 (1855.12-1943.35)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
85.6 pt ∼86%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
80.9 pt ∼81%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
78.8 pt ∼79%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
73.9 pt ∼74%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
70.2 pt ∼70%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 pt ∼68%
Average of class Gaming
 
63.7 pt ∼64%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
60.7 pt ∼61%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
59 pt ∼59%
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
18337 Points ∼100% +55%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
18203 Points ∼99% +54%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
16253 Points ∼89% +38%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=56)
15698 Points ∼86% +33%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
13934 Points ∼76% +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (2435 - 23482, n=218, last 2 years)
13188 Points ∼72% +12%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
12316 (11587.2min - 12316.3max) Points ∼67% +4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
12262 Points ∼67% +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11814 Points ∼64%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1928 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1799 Points ∼93% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1790 Points ∼93% +1%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
1778 Points ∼92% +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1765 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=55)
1757 Points ∼91% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (527 - 1936, n=217, last 2 years)
1548 Points ∼80% -12%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
1504 Points ∼78% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1431 Points ∼74% -19%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
7037 Points ∼100% +45%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
6889 Points ∼98% +42%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=56)
5937 Points ∼84% +22%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5892 Points ∼84% +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (930 - 9042, n=229, last 2 years)
5004 Points ∼71% +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
4847 Points ∼69%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
4808 Points ∼68% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4742 Points ∼67% -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
4724 Points ∼67% -3%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
740 Points ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
695 Points ∼94% 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
692 Points ∼94%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
689 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
686 Points ∼93% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=56)
678 Points ∼92% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (169 - 745, n=229, last 2 years)
596 Points ∼81% -14%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
580 Points ∼78% -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
556 Points ∼75% -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
2872 (2287.68min - 2523.66max) Points ∼100% +11%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
2830 (2696.14min - 2830.06max) Points ∼99% +10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
2820 (1902.5min - 2820.28max) Points ∼98% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2813 (2455.34min - 2812.94max) Points ∼98% +9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2580 (2349.9min - 2579.98max) Points ∼90%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
2518 (1886.88min - 2518.1max) Points ∼88% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=61)
2522 Points ∼88% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (400 - 3652, n=227, last 2 years)
2119 Points ∼74% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2025 Points ∼71% -22%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
1943 (1855.12min - 1943.35max) Points ∼68% -25%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
276 Points ∼100% +8%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points ∼95% +2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
257 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points ∼93% 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
256 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
250 Points ∼91% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=56)
253 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (79.2 - 282, n=221, last 2 years)
236 Points ∼86% -8%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼83% -11%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points ∼82% -11%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 1259, n=228, last 2 years)
267 Seconds * ∼100% -9%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
256 Seconds * ∼96% -4%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
250 Seconds * ∼94% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
247 Seconds * ∼93% -0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
246 Seconds * ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=55)
225 Seconds * ∼84% +9%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
208 Seconds * ∼78% +15%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
201 Seconds * ∼75% +18%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
182.7 Seconds * ∼68% +26%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
72679 MIPS ∼100% +30%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
69778 MIPS ∼96% +25%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
62405 MIPS ∼86% +12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=55)
60746 MIPS ∼84% +9%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
55958 MIPS ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
  (11386 - 88128, n=225, last 2 years)
55039 MIPS ∼76% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
55010 MIPS ∼76% -2%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54596 MIPS ∼75% -2%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
52870 MIPS ∼73% -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
6343 MIPS ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5863 MIPS ∼92% +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
5818 MIPS ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5907, n=55)
5627 MIPS ∼89% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5588 MIPS ∼88% -4%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
5588 MIPS ∼88% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2685 - 6582, n=225, last 2 years)
5554 MIPS ∼88% -5%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
5510 MIPS ∼87% -5%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
5472 MIPS ∼86% -6%
Geekbench 5.4 / Multi-Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
15116 Points ∼100% +30%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
13500 Points ∼89% +16%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
12661 Points ∼84% +9%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
11934 Points ∼79% +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=55)
11864 Points ∼78% +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
11626 Points ∼77%
Average of class Gaming
  (1946 - 16925, n=220, last 2 years)
9578 Points ∼63% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
7472 Points ∼49% -36%
Geekbench 5.4 / Single-Core
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
1902 Points ∼100% +9%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1810 Points ∼95% +3%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
1769 Points ∼93% +1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
1756 Points ∼92% 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
1749 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=55)
1734 Points ∼91% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (158 - 1949, n=220, last 2 years)
1556 Points ∼82% -11%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1464 Points ∼77% -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
20 fps ∼100% +37%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
19.6 fps ∼98% +34%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
19 fps ∼95% +30%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=56)
16.7 fps ∼84% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (3 - 26.6, n=229, last 2 years)
15.4 fps ∼77% +5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
15.1 fps ∼76% +3%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.1 fps ∼76% +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.6 fps ∼73%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
14.1 fps ∼71% -3%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
86.1 s * ∼100% -98%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
77.6 s * ∼90% -78%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.6 - 332, n=224, last 2 years)
52.2 s * ∼61% -20%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=55)
46 s * ∼53% -6%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.1 s * ∼51% -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
43.5 s * ∼51%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s * ∼50% +1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
41 s * ∼48% +6%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
37.7 s * ∼44% +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.555 sec * ∼100% -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 4.47, n=224, last 2 years)
0.536 sec * ∼97% -15%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.514 sec * ∼93% -10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=55)
0.4725 sec * ∼85% -1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4659 sec * ∼84%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4614 sec * ∼83% +1%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4609 sec * ∼83% +1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4489 sec * ∼81% +4%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX
0.4159 sec * ∼75% +11%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2580 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
195.8 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
250 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93.2 pt ∼93%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.4 pt ∼90%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
85.5 pt ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
 
76.8 pt ∼77%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
72.9 pt ∼73%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
70.6 pt ∼71%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
67.5 pt ∼68%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57.7 pt ∼58%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070 -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 pt ∼0%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15255 KRay/s ∼100% +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
15078 KRay/s ∼99%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
14345 KRay/s ∼94% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 22183, n=192, last 2 years)
12283 KRay/s ∼81% -19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=55)
10422 KRay/s ∼68% -31%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8399 KRay/s ∼55% -44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7636 KRay/s ∼50% -49%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
6797 KRay/s ∼45% -55%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
90996 Points ∼100% +21%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
78356 Points ∼86% +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
75435 Points ∼83%
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 117712, n=192, last 2 years)
66849 Points ∼73% -11%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=55)
50875 Points ∼56% -33%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40635 Points ∼45% -46%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
36195 Points ∼40% -52%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32381 Points ∼36% -57%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3791 MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3559 MB/s ∼94% -6%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
3408 MB/s ∼90% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (629 - 5123, n=192, last 2 years)
3110 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
3100 MB/s ∼82% -18%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=55)
3059 MB/s ∼81% -19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
2673 MB/s ∼71% -29%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2331 MB/s ∼61% -39%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
104457 Points ∼100% +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
102833 Points ∼98%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
99861 Points ∼96% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
99296 Points ∼95% -3%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
98276 Points ∼94% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=55)
97639 Points ∼93% -5%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
97195 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15371 - 116406, n=192, last 2 years)
93549 Points ∼90% -9%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
11871 Points ∼100% +23%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
10475 Points ∼88% +9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2137 - 17639, n=192, last 2 years)
10288 Points ∼87% +7%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9835 Points ∼83% +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9634 Points ∼81%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
9247 Points ∼78% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=55)
9092 Points ∼77% -6%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
8317 Points ∼70% -14%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
50136 Points ∼100% +35%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
39016 Points ∼78% +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
37158 Points ∼74%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 64776, n=192, last 2 years)
36463 Points ∼73% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=55)
27280 Points ∼54% -27%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
22321 Points ∼45% -40%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
21106 Points ∼42% -43%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
18863 Points ∼38% -49%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
136241 MB/s ∼100%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
134645 MB/s ∼99% -1%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
122777 MB/s ∼90% -10%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100255 MB/s ∼74% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (18146 - 183146, n=192, last 2 years)
95725 MB/s ∼70% -30%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
85401 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=55)
84090 MB/s ∼62% -38%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
49493 MB/s ∼36% -64%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1124 MB/s ∼100% +12%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
1004 MB/s ∼89%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
990 MB/s ∼88% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=55)
978 MB/s ∼87% -3%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
948 MB/s ∼84% -6%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
793 MB/s ∼71% -21%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
787 MB/s ∼70% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (150.9 - 1408, n=213, last 2 years)
769 MB/s ∼68% -23%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s ∼0% -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
8518 KRay/s ∼100% +7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
7989 KRay/s ∼94%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
7439 KRay/s ∼87% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 11913, n=192, last 2 years)
6668 KRay/s ∼78% -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=55)
5789 KRay/s ∼68% -28%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4769 KRay/s ∼56% -40%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
4457 KRay/s ∼52% -44%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
3917 KRay/s ∼46% -51%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40868 MPixel/s ∼100% +17%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
40386 MPixel/s ∼99% +16%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
34944 MPixel/s ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=55)
33819 MPixel/s ∼83% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
32915 MPixel/s ∼81% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 48269, n=192, last 2 years)
27040 MPixel/s ∼66% -23%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
27001 MPixel/s ∼66% -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
15341 MPixel/s ∼38% -56%

System Performance

Thanks to strong hardware, the gaming laptop also proves its strengths in the system performance benchmarks. Strong scores can be seen in all subareas of PCMark10 and CrossMark. Although HP's Omen 17 cannot place itself at the top of the comparison devices, all devices have very high performance values. This makes for a consistently responsive laptop in everyday use.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
7947 Points ∼100% +8%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
7899 Points ∼99% +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6941 - 7947, n=11)
7554 Points ∼95% +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7357 Points ∼93%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
7322 Points ∼92% 0%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7311 Points ∼92% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (4477 - 8636, n=185, last 2 years)
6959 Points ∼88% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
6749 Points ∼85% -8%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
5986 Points ∼75% -19%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10832 Points ∼100% +2%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
10648 Points ∼98% 0%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10646 Points ∼98%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10589 Points ∼98% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9892 - 10935, n=11)
10525 Points ∼97% -1%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10249 Points ∼95% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (7334 - 11318, n=184, last 2 years)
10133 Points ∼94% -5%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
10131 Points ∼94% -5%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
9289 Points ∼86% -13%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
10638 Points ∼100% +15%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
10237 Points ∼96% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9024 - 10638, n=11)
9816 Points ∼92% +6%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9549 Points ∼90% +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9279 Points ∼87%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
9205 Points ∼87% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10932, n=184, last 2 years)
9150 Points ∼86% -1%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9149 Points ∼86% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
6161 Points ∼58% -34%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
12342 Points ∼100% +13%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
12038 Points ∼98% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (10165 - 12546, n=11)
11337 Points ∼92% +4%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10938 Points ∼89%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
10888 Points ∼88% 0%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10701 Points ∼87% -2%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
10175 Points ∼82% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (5288 - 14291, n=184, last 2 years)
9933 Points ∼80% -9%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
8948 Points ∼73% -18%
CrossMark / Overall
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2155 Points ∼100% +18%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1957 Points ∼91% +7%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1833 Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (974 - 2000, n=12)
1817 Points ∼84% -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (974 - 2170, n=67, last 2 years)
1787 Points ∼83% -3%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1649 Points ∼77% -10%
CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2030 Points ∼100% +17%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1921 Points ∼95% +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (907 - 1962, n=12)
1761 Points ∼87% +1%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1741 Points ∼86%
Average of class Gaming
  (907 - 2062, n=67, last 2 years)
1726 Points ∼85% -1%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1536 Points ∼76% -12%
CrossMark / Creativity
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2304 Points ∼100% +15%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
2012 Points ∼87%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1963 Points ∼85% -2%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1938 Points ∼84% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1027 - 2366, n=67, last 2 years)
1891 Points ∼82% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1027 - 2057, n=12)
1873 Points ∼81% -7%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2134 Points ∼100% +32%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
2113 Points ∼99% +31%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1029 - 2142, n=12)
1833 Points ∼86% +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 2230, n=67, last 2 years)
1687 Points ∼79% +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
1613 Points ∼76%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
1210 Points ∼57% -25%
PCMark 10 Score
7357 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
63110 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
62852 MB/s ∼100% +19%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31252 - 80511, n=55)
54669 MB/s ∼87% +3%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
53008 MB/s ∼84%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
52925 MB/s ∼84% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=192, last 2 years)
46883 MB/s ∼74% -12%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
44627 MB/s ∼71% -16%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
38331 MB/s ∼61% -28%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
68051 MB/s ∼100% +14%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
66496 MB/s ∼98% +11%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
62745 MB/s ∼92% +5%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
59935 MB/s ∼88%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (32677 - 79442, n=55)
58276 MB/s ∼86% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=192, last 2 years)
50491 MB/s ∼74% -16%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47618 MB/s ∼70% -21%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
43460 MB/s ∼64% -27%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
64272 MB/s ∼100% +9%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
60001 MB/s ∼93% +2%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
58827 MB/s ∼92%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
57728 MB/s ∼90% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (30592 - 88660, n=55)
55630 MB/s ∼87% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 68782, n=192, last 2 years)
48205 MB/s ∼75% -18%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
47203 MB/s ∼73% -20%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
34098 MB/s ∼53% -42%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
100.8 ns * ∼100%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
93.5 ns * ∼93% +7%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
90.1 ns * ∼89% +11%
Aorus 17X XES
Intel Core i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
87 ns * ∼86% +14%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
77.9 ns * ∼77% +23%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=55)
73.8 ns * ∼73% +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (76.2 - 122, n=214, last 2 years)
66.1 ns * ∼66% +34%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latency

In the current configuration, the HP Omen 17 shows serious problems with the DPC latencies. 9988 µs was the result here. During the first test run, the laptop crashed completely and displayed a blue screen. Driver updates may be able to remedy this.

LatencyMon
LatencyMon
LatencyMon drivers
LatencyMon drivers
YouTube video playback test
YouTube video playback test
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
9988 μs * ∼100%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX707Z-HX011W
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N
2319 μs * ∼23% +77%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1907.6 μs * ∼19% +81%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, SK Hynix BC711 1TB HFM001TD3JX016N
1164 μs * ∼12% +88%
Aorus 17X XES
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
1115 μs * ∼11% +89%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, WDC PC SN810 1TB
717.4 μs * ∼7% +93%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
395.1 μs * ∼4% +96%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

The WDC PC SN810 1TB is a very fast NVMe SSD. In the memory benchmarks, however, its performance is significantly behind the top models in our benchmark table for SSDs und HDDs. The SSDs of the comparison devices also perform better here. On the other hand, the access times and transfer rates of the NVMe SSD in the HP Omen 17 are excellent. Unfortunately, the data transfer rates of the NVMe SSD drop keep collapsing after a certain time under long-term load (without the SSD's sensors indicating overheating). We also observed the same behavior in the HP Omen 16

WDC PC SN810 1TB
Sequential Read: 5233.79MB/s
Sequential Write: 2355.42MB/s
4K Read: 68.25MB/s
4K Write: 224.32MB/s
4K-64 Read: 1306.59MB/s
4K-64 Write: 2495.32MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.078ms
Access Time Write: 0.017ms
Copy ISO: 1813.44MB/s
Copy Program: 384.09MB/s
Copy Game: 1142.39MB/s
Score Read: 1898Points
Score Write: 2955Points
Score Total: 5693Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Aorus 17X XES
Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10
89.2 pt ∼89%
Razer Blade 17 RTX 3070
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
81.6 pt ∼82%
MSI Vector GP76 12UGS-434
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
74.1 pt ∼74%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
72.1 pt ∼72%
Average WDC PC SN810 1TB
 
72 pt ∼72%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng
WDC PC SN810 1TB
66.5 pt ∼67%
Average of class Gaming