Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Schenker XMG Pro 17 with RTX 3080 (Clevo PC70HS) review: A throttled ultra-slim gaming laptop and workstation in one

More a workstation than a gaming laptop. Like its 15-inch sibling model, the new XMG Pro 17 also comes in an ultra-slim case, while still bringing an RTX 3080. To avoid potential problems with the cooling system, Schenker throttles this. We find out in this test, whether this concept succeeds and why the slim high-performance laptop is more of a workstation than a gaming device.

The last time we tested the 17-inch version of the XMG Pro was in the beginning of 2020, and a lot has happened since then. As we saw in the 15-inch version in March of last year, Schenker has completely reworked the design, turning a case that used to be thick into a particularly slim system with high-performance hardware that is targeted for gamers as well as creative professionals. We now ask whether this ultra-slim design can offer sufficient power for gamers and professionals at the same time.

The predecessor with its RTX 2060 and Intel Core i7-9750H is hardly suited for comparison anymore. For the benchmarks, we therefore use other competitors such as the Alienware x17 R1, the Medion Erazer Beast X25, and the significantly more expensive Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 and MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH, as well as the 15-inch XMG Pro 15 sibling model for comparison.

XMG Pro 17 (XMG Pro 17 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 135 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, 105 W TDP, No whisperMode, no advanced Optimus, Geforce 497.09, Optimus
Memory
32768 MB 
, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR4 SDRAM (DDR4-3200, M471A2K43DB1-CWE)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B), IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, 860 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: headset port, microphone port, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.9 x 395.9 x 264.95 ( = 0.78 x 15.59 x 10.43 in)
Battery
73 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, battery: only 12 months
Weight
2.431 kg ( = 85.75 oz / 5.36 pounds), Power Supply: 591 g ( = 20.85 oz / 1.3 pounds)
Price
3323.99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible Competitors for Comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
84.7 %
01/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
84.6 %
01/2022
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg19.8 mm15.60"3840x2160
89 %
09/2021
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3.2 kg21.4 mm17.30"3840x2160
85 %
07/2021
Medion Erazer Beast X25
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg23 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.2 %
09/2021
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.4 kg20 mm17.30"3840x2160
90.1 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440

Case - Ultra-slim metal case with a plastic keyboard

Maximum opening angle: 130 degrees
Maximum opening angle: 130 degrees

The slim, black case is now almost completely made of metal, except for the display bezels and the keyboard that is set into the base. For a gaming laptop, the design is kept very modest, reflecting more its parallel ambitions of being a professional workstation.

The basis is not completely resistant to warping but still fairly robust, even though it still produces various creaking noises when we try to bend it, particularly on the right side.

Although the display lid can also be bent slightly, it appears comfortably robust due to the metal frame. The hinges could have been tighter, particularly with small opening angles.

Schenker offers various 17-inch laptops, but the new XMG Pro 17 can easily beat the Key, Apex, Core, Ultra, Focus, Neo, and the predecessor in terms of a slim design. It is a full centimeter (~0.4 in) slimmer, making it the slimmest 17-inch Schenker overall!

The MSI and the Asus ROG are similarly slim but cost considerably more. The Alienware and the Medion cannot quite keep up here, even if at least the Alienware is anything but thick.

Size Comparison

399.23 mm / 15.7 inch 299.49 mm / 11.8 inch 21.4 mm / 0.843 inch 3.2 kg7.09 lbs395 mm / 15.6 inch 262 mm / 10.3 inch 23 mm / 0.906 inch 2.3 kg5 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 20 mm / 0.787 inch 2.4 kg5.26 lbs395.9 mm / 15.6 inch 264.95 mm / 10.4 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.4 kg5.36 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.1 lbs357.5 mm / 14.1 inch 238 mm / 9.37 inch 19.8 mm / 0.78 inch 2 kg4.4 lbs

Equipment - 3 external monitors

With Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C without a charging function), MiniDisplayport, and HDMI, you can connect three external monitors to the Pro 17. All the display ports are G-Sync compatible. The separate ports for microphone and headphones are also positive.

On the other hand, professional users will probably miss an SD card reader, and the positioning of the connections also gives some small reason for complaint. Even though the ports are distributed over the back, left, and right sides, unfortunately they are placed very close together. In this regard, all the manufacturers should take a look at the affordable MSI GP66 Leopard as a good example.

Left: Kensington, USB-A 3.0, headset, microphone
Left: Kensington, USB-A 3.0, headset, microphone
Right: 2x USB-A 3.0, LAN
Right: 2x USB-A 3.0, LAN
Back: MiniDP, HDMI 2.1, power, USB-C 3.2 Gen2x1 with Thunderbolt 4
Back: MiniDP, HDMI 2.1, power, USB-C 3.2 Gen2x1 with Thunderbolt 4
Front: Control LEDs
Front: Control LEDs

Communication

The WiFi module
The WiFi module

While the Intel AX201 WiFi module used here achieves Gigabit speeds, it still performs slightly below its full capabilities, particularly when receiving data.

Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1499 (1390min - 1622max) MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1498 (748min - 1544max) MBit/s ∼100% +39%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1460 (1142min - 1595max) MBit/s ∼97% +36%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1220 (1110min - 1275max) MBit/s ∼81% +13%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=322)
1162 MBit/s ∼78% +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (450 - 1603, n=162, last 2 years)
1160 MBit/s ∼77% +8%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1075 (526min - 1130max) MBit/s ∼72%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s ∼42% -41%
iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1390 (669min - 1618max) MBit/s ∼100% +37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1328 (642min - 1384max) MBit/s ∼96% +31%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1290 (800min - 1659max) MBit/s ∼93% +28%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=322)
1261 MBit/s ∼91% +25%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1242 (1169min - 1337max) MBit/s ∼89% +23%
Average of class Gaming
  (90 - 1743, n=162, last 2 years)
1236 MBit/s ∼89% +22%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1011 (390min - 1048max) MBit/s ∼73%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s ∼50% -31%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12: Ø944 (390-1048)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) 1 m 4M x10 Netgear AX12: Ø993 (526-1130)

Webcam

Despite the target group being creative professionals, there is a standard 720p webcam that struggles with even larger color deviations than the competitors, which are already not very good. 

ColorChecker
22.1 ∆E
22.9 ∆E
24.9 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
23.2 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
31.6 ∆E
17 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
17.7 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
26.4 ∆E
27.1 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
14.7 ∆E
20.4 ∆E
30.6 ∆E
2 ∆E
9 ∆E
17 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080): 20.91 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 31.58 ∆E

Security

There is a Kensington Lock slot and also TPM 2.0. In addition, the Pro 17 offers a fingerprint sensor, which is integrated into the top left corner of the touchpad.

The sensor operates in combination with Windows Hello and succeeds in unlocking the laptop very quickly.

Accessories

In addition to the usual paperwork, as typical for Schenker the box includes a USB stick with drivers and alternatively also a driver CD, as well as a black cleaning cloth. Other manufacturers only include less or no accessories at all.

Maintenance

The bottom of the case is secured with 12 Philips screws. After removing them, it is not too hard to pry open the bottom plate although it is made of solid metal. Once you get access to the insides, you can replace the two RAM modules, the WLAN module, and the SSD and also clean the two fans. There is space for a second SSD, and the battery is also accessible.

Taking a look inside
Taking a look inside
The 2 Samsung RAM modules
The 2 Samsung RAM modules

Warranty

XMG offers a two-year manufacturer warranty. When ordering the laptop, you can also expand this to three years at an extra cost. In contrast to many other manufacturers, the warranty service also includes a free inspection. After you send in the laptop for free, it is cleaned, the heat paste is renewed, and the firmware is updated to the newest version. If you like, Windows can also be reinstalled with all the current updates.

Warranty conditions
Warranty conditions

Input Devices - Small keys on a keyboard that bends too much

Keyboard

The keyboard
The keyboard

The keys look fairly small, particularly for a 17-inch laptop. But the layout looks very clean, and there is a number block. Unfortunately, there is no gap between the regular keyboard and the number block, so that the regular-sized arrow keys are not placed separately but positioned between the two keyboard halves.

It is not apparent at first glance, but the keyboard, which is set into the metal base, is only made from thin plastic. This means that the thin plate below the keys bends down a lot, moving in visible waves while typing. This is a bit much for us and becomes annoying.

The stroke height turns out mediocre, but the feedback is clear and typing is fairly comfortable. Only the small size of the keys is slightly annoying. The typing noise is very moderate.

The keyboard offers a separate RGB illumination for each key, allowing you to illuminate the WASD keys in a different color, for example, to make them stand out more from the other keys. The settings for this are contained in the Control Center.

The arrow keys
The arrow keys
Very small (Function) keys
Very small (Function) keys
The power button
The power button

Touchpad

The touchpad
The touchpad

The touchpad is fairly large (~13 x 6.8 cm, ~5.1 x 2.7 in) with dedicated mouse keys below. The fingerprint sensor is integrated in the left, top corner. Finger movements above and to the left of that are not registered.

The surface allows easy sliding of the fingers, and there are hardly any stutters even in slow movements.

The extra mouse keys below are wide and make a good impression at first glance. The volume of the mouse clicks is also at a moderate level. However, when listening closely, the keys produce some slight squeaking noise. 

Display - 4K with a high color space coverage

A matte, grainy pixel grid
A matte, grainy pixel grid

The matte 4K IPS display is the same that is used in the Schenker XMG Ultra 17 from last year. Unfortunately, you have to make do without a higher refresh rate due to the 4K resolution. Alternatively, the laptop is also available with a Full-HD display and fast 300 Hz.

In addition, the panel is very bright, and the brightness distribution is still decent. The black value and contrast are also at a good level, with the latter being even slightly higher than that of the competitors.

What is less good is the very lame response time. In combination with the lower refresh rate, this also shows that the XMG Pro 17 with the 4K display is targeted more towards creative professionals, while gamers might rather choose the Full-HD model, depending on their preference.

We did not detect any PWM. Even looking very closely in the dark, we can only see some minimal screen bleeding at the bottom edge (but it is not visible in the screenshot), so this is not problematic.

470
cd/m²
492
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
441
cd/m²
475
cd/m²
447
cd/m²
415
cd/m²
428
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B)
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 492 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 451.1 cd/m² Minimum: 28 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 471 cd/m²
Contrast: 1397:1 (Black: 0.34 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.84 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4, calibrated: 3.51
ΔE Greyscale 6.56 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
100% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.42
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
AUO B173ZAN3.0 (AUO309B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung ATNA56WR14-0, OLED, 3840x2160, 15.60
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
AU Optronics B173ZAN, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Medion Erazer Beast X25
BOE NE173FHM-NZ1 (BOE0884), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.30
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
AUO B173ZAN06.1 (AUODE95), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.30
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30
Display
-7%
0%
-16%
-23%
-3%
Display P3 Coverage
87.1
81.2
-7%
88.3
1%
70.4
-19%
63
-28%
94.2
8%
sRGB Coverage
100
97.7
-2%
100
0%
99.8
0%
94.8
-5%
98.7
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
100
89.1
-11%
100
0%
71.6
-28%
65
-35%
84.4
-16%
Response Times
94%
69%
82%
81%
83%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
46.8 ?(23.4, 23.4)
3.2 ?(1.2, 2)
93%
14.4 ?(7.6, 6.8)
69%
9.2 ?(4.8, 4.4)
80%
8.8 ?(2.8, 6)
81%
4.8
90%
Response Time Black / White *
32.6 ?(16.6, 16)
1.6 ?(1, 0.6)
95%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
68%
5.6 ?(2.8, 2.8)
83%
6.4 ?(2, 4.4)
80%
8
75%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(81)
Screen
212%
13%
17%
22%
11%
Brightness middle
475
443
-7%
438.7
-8%
329
-31%
474
0%
322
-32%
Brightness
451
434
-4%
435
-4%
315
-30%
454
1%
288
-36%
Brightness Distribution
84
94
12%
91
8%
88
5%
88
5%
72
-14%
Black Level *
0.34
0.02
94%
0.48
-41%
0.33
3%
0.46
-35%
0.3
12%
Contrast
1397
22150
1486%
914
-35%
997
-29%
1030
-26%
1073
-23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.84
3.73
36%
4.34
26%
2.03
65%
1.5
74%
3.05
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.97
8.12
19%
7.3
27%
5.5
45%
5.59
44%
5.23
48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.51
0.72
79%
0.82
77%
0.86
75%
1.92
45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.56
2.5
62%
2.4
63%
3.5
47%
2.8
57%
3.11
53%
Gamma
2.42 91%
2.001 110%
2.09 105%
2.223 99%
2.158 102%
2.13 103%
CCT
6376 102%
6522 100%
6413 101%
6526 100%
6597 99%
6553 99%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
84
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
Total Average (Program / Settings)
100% / 144%
27% / 18%
28% / 19%
27% / 21%
30% / 18%

* ... smaller is better

Schenker advertises the display as color calibrated by X-Rite, but the color deviations still leave room for improvement. Warm, red tones are dominating, at least at full brightness. A manual calibration decreases the Delta-E value further, and you can download the corresponding ICC profile file from the link further above.

Grayscale
Grayscale
Saturation
Saturation
Colorchecker
Colorchecker
Grayscale calibrated
Grayscale calibrated
Saturation calibrated
Saturation calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated
ColorChecker calibrated

The display is very well suited for image processing and video editing, since various color spaces are covered well. While sRGB and AdobeRGB are covered completely, DCI-P3 is still covered to 87%.

The 4K panel of the Alienware and the 2K panel of the Asus Zephyrus are similarly good, and the Medion Erazer Beast and the MSI GS76 Stealth turn out worse here, but this is also a matter of the price.

sRGB 100%
sRGB 100%
AdobeRGB 99.9%
AdobeRGB 99.9%
DCI-P3 87.1%
DCI-P3 87.1%

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.6 ms rise
↘ 16 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (23.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 23.4 ms rise
↘ 23.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.692 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (37 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 21913 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Outdoors, the matte surface, the high brightness of more than 400 Nits, the good viewing angles, and the fairly high contrast will benefit, allowing you to read the display contents in most situations without being impacted much.

The viewing angle stability is decent, even though the brightness decreases noticeably from extreme viewing angles. There are IPS panels with even more stable viewing angles.

Performance - Throttled for the slim case

Schenker advertises the XMG Pro 17 targeting gamers as well as professional users. The Intel Core i7-11800H and particularly the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 laptop GPU, and also the ample 32 GB of RAM support this cause. On the other hand, the 4K display with only 60 Hz but very good color space coverage shows that the laptop aims slightly more towards the needs of creative users rather than gamers. Also, you wouldn't really expect the highest gaming performance from an ultra-slim design either. For example, the TGP of the graphics card is limited to relatively weak 105 watts.

 

Test Conditions

The XMG performance modes
The XMG performance modes

Schenker is fairly transparent about the performance values of its various performance profiles. The manufacturer officially recommends the "Entertainment" mode as the best compromise between noise volume and performance. However, since we measure all the gaming laptops in the best performance mode (without overclocking), we change to the "Performance" mode in the Control Center. Only here, the GPU is also allowed to use the Dynamic Boost, and the TDPs of the CPU are also slightly higher. The image below shows the performance values of all the modes as listed by Schenker.

TDPs and TGPs depending on the performance mode (image source: Schenker)
TDPs and TGPs depending on the performance mode (image source: Schenker)

Processor

The Intel Core i7-11800H offers an ample eight cores that have a clock speed between 2.3 and 4.6 GHz.

In the Cinebench loop, the values drop by about 7% within the first four or five loops, but they remain stable after that.

Even though they use the same CPU, the XMG Pro is unable to keep up with the powerful, unthrottled Alienware X17 in the multi-core test, and the rest of the competitors are slightly ahead of it. However, these small differences are not relevant in everyday operation, and only the Alienware is significantly faster by 10 to 15%.

In the single-core tests, the differences between the laptops are significantly smaller.

In battery mode, the CPU performance is considerably lower. After an initial value of 13 watts, the TDP decreases to only 11.5 watts. Correspondingly, the score drops from 1,865 - 2,009 to only 534 points, which is a decrease of at least 71%!

TDP in mains vs. battery operation
TDP in mains vs. battery operation

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080) Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1879 (1859.17-2009.14)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2136 (2089.97-2164.85)
Medion Erazer Beast X25 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2004 (1981.96-2041.34)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | 64 Bit Single-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
79.9 pt ∼80%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
77.1 pt ∼77%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
76.4 pt ∼76%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
75.4 pt ∼75%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
75.3 pt ∼75%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
74.1 pt ∼74%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
70.8 pt ∼71%
Average of class Gaming
 
68.1 pt ∼68%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
14011 (13899.7min - 14010.8max) Points ∼100% +14%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
13012 Points ∼93% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12721 Points ∼91% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points ∼91% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points ∼88% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12253 Points ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (4032 - 19282, n=160, last 2 years)
12229 Points ∼87% 0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6508 - 14088, n=41)
11684 Points ∼83% -5%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points ∼100% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1575 Points ∼99% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1516 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points ∼95% 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
1508 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1522, n=38)
1495 Points ∼94% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (778 - 1920, n=159, last 2 years)
1484 Points ∼94% -2%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
5383 Points ∼100% +16%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points ∼93% +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
4878 Points ∼91% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points ∼89% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4756 Points ∼88% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4647 Points ∼86%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2498 - 5408, n=43)
4471 Points ∼83% -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (1397 - 7382, n=228, last 2 years)
4329 Points ∼80% -7%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
610 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points ∼100% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
585 Points ∼96% 0%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points ∼95% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=40)
575 Points ∼94% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (300 - 740, n=228, last 2 years)
547 Points ∼90% -6%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points ∼100% +9%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
2165 (2089.97min - 2164.85max) Points ∼99% +8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
2148 (1832.59min - 2147.65max) Points ∼98% +7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
2050 Points ∼94% +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points ∼93% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
2009 (1859.17min - 2009.14max) Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=42)
1911 Points ∼88% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (536 - 3077, n=240, last 2 years)
1818 Points ∼83% -10%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼100% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼99% +4%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
238 Points ∼99% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
229 Points ∼95%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points ∼93% -2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
225 Points ∼93% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (201 - 231, n=39)
225 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (108 - 277, n=230, last 2 years)
219 Points ∼91% -4%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming
  (168 - 732, n=228, last 2 years)
292 Seconds * ∼100% -14%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 454, n=39)
275 Seconds * ∼94% -7%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
256 Seconds * ∼88%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * ∼86% +2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
249 Seconds * ∼85% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
243 Seconds * ∼83% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * ∼79% +10%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
219 Seconds * ∼75% +14%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS ∼97% +11%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
55743 MIPS ∼94% +8%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
54133 MIPS ∼91% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
53205 MIPS ∼90% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
51421 MIPS ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
  (21148 - 76063, n=227, last 2 years)
48965 MIPS ∼83% -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (33718 - 56758, n=39)
48377 MIPS ∼82% -6%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS ∼100% +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS ∼98% +1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
5640 MIPS ∼97% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5587 MIPS ∼96%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5521 MIPS ∼95% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=39)
5491 MIPS ∼95% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (2743 - 6506, n=227, last 2 years)
5383 MIPS ∼93% -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
5367 MIPS ∼93% -4%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
9856 Points ∼100% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points ∼98% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
9408 Points ∼95% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
9380 Points ∼95%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points ∼94% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4655 - 9851, n=33)
8530 Points ∼87% -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (2783 - 14294, n=220, last 2 years)
8266 Points ∼84% -12%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points ∼100% +3%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
1632 Points ∼99% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1602 Points ∼97%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1571 Points ∼95% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1429 - 1625, n=33)
1560 Points ∼95% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points ∼93% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (703 - 1933, n=220, last 2 years)
1437 Points ∼87% -10%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.2 fps ∼100% +15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps ∼97% +12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps ∼92% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15.7 fps ∼91% +5%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
15 fps ∼87% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.9 fps ∼87%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (7.38 - 17.4, n=39)
13.8 fps ∼80% -7%
Average of class Gaming
  (4.67 - 22.5, n=229, last 2 years)
13.7 fps ∼80% -8%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming
  (23.9 - 113, n=225, last 2 years)
52.6 s * ∼100% -8%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * ∼94% -1%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
49.3 s * ∼94% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.8 s * ∼93% -0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
48.7 s * ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 59.9, n=38)
46.7 s * ∼89% +4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.5 s * ∼88% +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * ∼84% +9%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.565 sec * ∼100% -3%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=39)
0.565 sec * ∼100% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.412 - 1.088, n=224, last 2 years)
0.553 sec * ∼98% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.549 sec * ∼97%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.549 sec * ∼97% -0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.533 sec * ∼94% +3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * ∼94% +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * ∼87% +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2009 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
197 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
229 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
99.8 pt ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
 
86.9 pt ∼87%
Average of class Gaming
 
84.7 pt ∼85%
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
14463 KRay/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8772 - 15961, n=13)
13548 KRay/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (2585 - 19199, n=182, last 2 years)
11424 KRay/s ∼79% -21%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (12439 - 110797, n=182, last 2 years)
61783 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
60967 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (39404 - 65636, n=13)
57788 Points ∼94% -5%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4109 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (2599 - 4439, n=13)
3867 MB/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (833 - 4851, n=182, last 2 years)
2823 MB/s ∼69% -31%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91605 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (88481 - 91941, n=13)
91364 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (30447 - 132615, n=182, last 2 years)
89060 Points ∼97% -3%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (3007 - 17639, n=182, last 2 years)
9878 Points ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9775 Points ∼99%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (6420 - 9787, n=13)
9170 Points ∼93% -6%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
36460 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (23365 - 39464, n=13)
34571 Points ∼95% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (7135 - 61370, n=182, last 2 years)
33453 Points ∼92% -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
142475 MB/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (74617 - 149388, n=13)
124625 MB/s ∼87% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (11368 - 156370, n=182, last 2 years)
74832 MB/s ∼53% -47%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
773 MB/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (305 - 1209, n=203, last 2 years)
680 MB/s ∼88% -12%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (461 - 830, n=36)
286 (461min - 830max) MB/s ∼37% -63%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
7830 KRay/s ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (4545 - 8717, n=14)
7347 KRay/s ∼94% -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1437 - 10472, n=182, last 2 years)
6199 KRay/s ∼79% -21%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
26597 MPixel/s ∼100%
Average of class Gaming
  (8341 - 46643, n=182, last 2 years)
24105 MPixel/s ∼91% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (11898 - 26732, n=14)
21789 MPixel/s ∼82% -18%

System Performance

In PCMark 10, the XMG Pro doesn't necessarily deliver the most powerful performance, to say it mildly. Usually, the competitors in the test remain fairly close together, but our test unit always remains behind the competitors by about 8% (MSI) to 18% (Alienware). While in this performance class, this won't really be that noticeable in everyday operation since everything runs smoothly, for performance enthusiasts, the PCMark scores of the slim laptop are a disappointment.

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
7470 Points ∼100% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points ∼97% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (6673 - 7470, n=11)
7154 Points ∼96% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6996 Points ∼94%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6842 Points ∼92% -2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6822 Points ∼91% -2%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6673 Points ∼89% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (4077 - 8186, n=192, last 2 years)
6455 Points ∼86% -8%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points ∼100% +6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9862 - 11064, n=11)
10328 Points ∼97% +3%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
10130 Points ∼95% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10024 Points ∼94%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10018 Points ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9862 Points ∼93% -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (7148 - 11205, n=191, last 2 years)
9817 Points ∼92% -2%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9690 Points ∼91% -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
9803 Points ∼100% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9252 Points ∼94% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points ∼94% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9126 Points ∼93%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8278 - 9803, n=11)
9115 Points ∼93% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8882 Points ∼91% -3%
Average of class Gaming
  (6161 - 10638, n=191, last 2 years)
8664 Points ∼88% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8278 Points ∼84% -9%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
11323 Points ∼100% +11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points ∼93% +4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (9881 - 11323, n=11)
10560 Points ∼93% +4%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10160 Points ∼90%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10014 Points ∼88% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9881 Points ∼87% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9377 Points ∼83% -8%
Average of class Gaming
  (3670 - 13098, n=191, last 2 years)
8712 Points ∼77% -14%
PCMark 10 Score
6996 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48016 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47304 MB/s ∼99%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
42811 MB/s ∼89% -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (24508 - 48016, n=14)
42715 MB/s ∼89% -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (18074 - 77803, n=182, last 2 years)
42110 MB/s ∼88% -11%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
48045 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
47698 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (20318 - 76185, n=182, last 2 years)
45925 MB/s ∼96% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (25882 - 50365, n=13)
45674 MB/s ∼95% -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
44887 MB/s ∼93% -6%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46718 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46214 MB/s ∼99% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46176 MB/s ∼99%
Average of class Gaming
  (15975 - 66256, n=182, last 2 years)
44315 MB/s ∼95% -4%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (22240 - 46214, n=13)
42987 MB/s ∼92% -7%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
93.6 ns * ∼100% -1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.3 ns * ∼99%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.8 ns * ∼92% +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (97.6 - 122, n=205, last 2 years)
61.2 ns * ∼65% +34%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (77.3 - 97.5, n=37)
34.4 (77.3min - 97.5max) ns * ∼37% +63%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns * ∼0% +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC Latencies

When just opening the web browser (Edge), the LatencyMon software already encounters some latency problems. These increase when playing our 4K, 60-fps YouTube test video (32 dropped frames) or briefly starting the Prime95 test.

The fault appears to lie mainly in the ACPI driver for NT, but there is also an Nvidia driver that creates some problems for the system.

However, in our comparison the size of the latency value is more in the middle of the field, and the comparison laptops are also not free of problems. It is only that their latencies start later and definitely not when just starting the browser.

YouTube test video
YouTube test video
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Main
LatencyMon Drivers
LatencyMon Drivers
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, 2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4407 μs * ∼100% -250%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1445 μs * ∼33% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1259 μs * ∼29%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1056 μs * ∼24% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
907 μs * ∼21% +28%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
762 μs * ∼17% +39%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Solution

Schenker uses the proven and fast Samsung SSD 980 Pro with 1 TB of storage space. Its performance is at the top end, and only the PM9A1 (MSI, Asus Zephyrus) from the same manufacturer is slightly faster in some areas.

During the constant read test, the very high performance drops slightly over time, but it should still be higher than that of some competitors.

Crystaldiskmark
Crystaldiskmark
AS SSD
AS SSD
AS SSD Copy
AS SSD Copy
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7109 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5188 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 754 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 580 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 93.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 243 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 1666 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2849 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
93.7 pt ∼94%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90.4 pt ∼90%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
83.6 pt ∼84%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
78.7 pt ∼79%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
70.7 pt ∼71%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
53.5 pt ∼54%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
51.4 pt ∼51%
Average of class Gaming
 
50.2 pt ∼50%
DiskSpd
seq read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4645 (4634.08min - 4645.19max) MB/s ∼100% +8%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4285 (4213.14min - 4284.51max) MB/s ∼92%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3980 (3953.55min - 3979.77max) MB/s ∼86% -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 - 4315, n=12)
3980 MB/s ∼86% -7%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3829 (3821.85min - 3829.08max) MB/s ∼82% -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2376 (2356.88min - 2376.42max) MB/s ∼51% -45%
Average of class Gaming
  (170 - 4931, n=189, last 2 years)
2295 MB/s ∼49% -46%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2161 (2137.42min - 2160.91max) MB/s ∼47% -50%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4574 (4560.15min - 4574.31max) MB/s ∼100% +6%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4325 (4312.56min - 4324.91max) MB/s ∼95%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4318 (3897.94min - 4317.86max) MB/s ∼94% 0%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 - 4360, n=12)
4015 MB/s ∼88% -7%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3834 (3789.52min - 3833.59max) MB/s ∼84% -11%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2978 (2936.01min - 2977.75max) MB/s ∼65% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (174 - 7889, n=188, last 2 years)
2479 MB/s ∼54% -43%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2461 (2448.92min - 2461.11max) MB/s ∼54% -43%
seq q8 t1 read
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7089 (6335.16min - 7089.42max) MB/s ∼100% +6%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
6684 (5510.27min - 6684.46max) MB/s ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6672 (6155.41min - 6672.09max) MB/s ∼94% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6670 (6036.74min - 6669.78max) MB/s ∼94% 0%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6666 (6346.92min - 6665.59max) MB/s ∼94%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 - 6701, n=12)
6340 MB/s ∼89% -5%
Average of class Gaming
  (144 - 13195, n=189, last 2 years)
3742 MB/s ∼53% -44%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3471 (3205.62min - 3471.02max) MB/s ∼49% -48%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5251 (5213.16min - 5250.64max) MB/s ∼100% +5%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5006 (4951.75min - 5006.11max) MB/s ∼95%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4949 (4924.12min - 4949.28max) MB/s ∼94% -1%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4917 (4616.04min - 4917.19max) MB/s ∼94% -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 - 5013, n=12)
4748 MB/s ∼90% -5%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4124 (2287.86min - 4123.91max) MB/s ∼79% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3537 (3525.65min - 3537.42max) MB/s ∼67% -29%
Average of class Gaming
  (86.2 - 9830, n=189, last 2 years)
2967 MB/s ∼57% -41%
4k q1 t1 read
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
93.6 (93.28min - 93.6max) MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
91.2 (91.05min - 91.17max) MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (62.7 - 94.3, n=12)
83.2 MB/s ∼89% -11%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.7 (62.59min - 62.69max) MB/s ∼67% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
62.4 (62.03min - 62.36max) MB/s ∼67% -33%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
56.2 (55.28min - 56.2max) MB/s ∼60% -40%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.53 - 97.4, n=189, last 2 years)
55.1 MB/s ∼59% -41%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
51.2 (51.08min - 51.21max) MB/s ∼55% -45%
4k q1 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
255 (254.32min - 255.35max) MB/s ∼100% +3%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
248 (247.22min - 247.96max) MB/s ∼97%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
246 (245.08min - 246.35max) MB/s ∼96% -1%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (160 - 260, n=12)
229 MB/s ∼90% -8%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
174 (171.94min - 173.87max) MB/s ∼68% -30%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.79 - 421, n=188, last 2 years)
168.6 MB/s ∼66% -32%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
166 (164.47min - 165.73max) MB/s ∼65% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
134 (134.04min - 134.47max) MB/s ∼53% -46%
4k q32 t16 read
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4198 (4186.31min - 4197.96max) MB/s ∼100%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4192 (4183.34min - 4192.34max) MB/s ∼100% 0%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4071 (4064.6min - 4070.6max) MB/s ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4060 (4051.28min - 4059.64max) MB/s ∼97% -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1271 - 4198, n=12)
3278 MB/s ∼78% -22%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.1 - 4198, n=188, last 2 years)
1749 MB/s ∼42% -58%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1393 (1367.28min - 1392.8max) MB/s ∼33% -67%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
724 (719.56min - 724.12max) MB/s ∼17% -83%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3531 (3517.4min - 3531.03max) MB/s ∼100% +188%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3437 (3425.9min - 3437.33max) MB/s ∼97% +181%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (470 - 3758, n=12)
2081 MB/s ∼59% +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (1.15 - 4249, n=188, last 2 years)
1744 MB/s ∼49% +42%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1225 (1217.23min - 1224.73max) MB/s ∼35%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1184 (1165.59min - 1184.31max) MB/s ∼34% -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
509 (508.08min - 509.24max) MB/s ∼14% -58%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
376 (372.82min - 375.8max) MB/s ∼11% -69%
AS SSD
Score Total
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9011 Points ∼100%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8830 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8380 Points ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (5763 - 9033, n=12)
7360 Points ∼82% -18%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6065 Points ∼67% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5733 Points ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (910 - 9279, n=181, last 2 years)
5077 Points ∼56% -44%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4314 Points ∼48% -52%
Score Read
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3372 Points ∼100%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3285 Points ∼97% -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3161 Points ∼94% -6%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1850 - 3512, n=12)
2906 Points ∼86% -14%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2673 Points ∼79% -21%
Average of class Gaming
  (389 - 3587, n=181, last 2 years)
1899 Points ∼56% -44%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1801 Points ∼53% -47%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1648 Points ∼49% -51%
Score Write
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3980 Points ∼100%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3953 Points ∼99% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3631 Points ∼91% -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3269 Points ∼82% -18%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1412 - 4106, n=12)
3044 Points ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (335 - 4414, n=181, last 2 years)
2224 Points ∼56% -44%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2211 Points ∼56% -44%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1737 Points ∼44% -56%
Seq Read
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5408 MB/s ∼100% +2%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5315 MB/s ∼98%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5274 MB/s ∼98% -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5085 MB/s ∼94% -4%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
4978 MB/s ∼92% -6%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (545 - 5464, n=12)
4632 MB/s ∼86% -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (252 - 6562, n=181, last 2 years)
3075 MB/s ∼57% -42%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2591 MB/s ∼48% -51%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4434 MB/s ∼100% +13%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3920 MB/s ∼88%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3863 MB/s ∼87% -1%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1613 - 4001, n=12)
3440 MB/s ∼78% -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (308 - 7663, n=181, last 2 years)
2386 MB/s ∼54% -39%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
2058 MB/s ∼46% -47%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1900 MB/s ∼43% -52%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1613 MB/s ∼36% -59%
4K Read
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
86.2 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
80.3 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (53.5 - 86.8, n=12)
73.5 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
55 MB/s ∼64% -36%
Average of class Gaming
  (20 - 108, n=181, last 2 years)
54.1 MB/s ∼63% -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
53.9 MB/s ∼63% -37%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
52.7 MB/s ∼61% -39%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
43.4 MB/s ∼50% -50%
4K Write
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
220.6 MB/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
214.7 MB/s ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
208.7 MB/s ∼95% -5%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (134.6 - 223, n=12)
195.2 MB/s ∼88% -12%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
153.1 MB/s ∼69% -31%
Average of class Gaming
  (18 - 364, n=181, last 2 years)
147.1 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
146.9 MB/s ∼67% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
112.6 MB/s ∼51% -49%
4K-64 Read
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2754 MB/s ∼100%
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2692 MB/s ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2573 MB/s ∼93% -7%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1305 - 2938, n=12)
2328 MB/s ∼85% -15%
Schenker XMG Pro 15 (Late 2021)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2091 MB/s ∼76% -24%
Average of class Gaming
  (216 - 2959, n=181, last 2 years)
1538 MB/s ∼56% -44%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1335 MB/s ∼48% -52%
Alienware x17 RTX 3080 P48E
2x WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 (RAID 0)
1260 MB/s ∼46% -54%
4K-64 Write
MSI GS76 Stealth 11UH
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3414 MB/s ∼100% +1%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 (Late 2021, RTX 3080)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3367 MB/s ∼99%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2972 MB/s ∼87% -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2966 MB/s ∼87% -12%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (811 - 3708, n=12)
2505 MB/s ∼73% -26%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.8 - 3859, n=181, last 2 years)