Notebookcheck
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 laptop review: 165 W GeForce RTX 3080 for ultrathin size

Great alternative to MSI, Asus or Razer. Super-thin gaming laptops are sexy and all, but they typically come with lower-power GPUs in the 100 W range. The Maingear Vector Pro bucks the trend by stuffing a 165 W GPU into a chassis the size of a Razer Blade Pro, but can it actually perform?
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

The Vector Pro is an ultra-thin 17.3-inch gaming laptop from the custom PC builder Maingear. It's an ultrathin high-performance system in the same vein as the MSI GS75, Razer Blade Pro, Asus Zephyrus S17, or Dell Alienware x17 series.

Our test unit has been fully configured with the 11th gen Core i7-11800H CPU, 165 W GeForce RTX 3080 GPU, and 165 Hz 1440p IPS display for approximately $2500 USD retail. Lesser SKUs to be made available with the RTX 3070 for lower starting prices.

It's worth mentioning that the Vector Pro utilizes a white label Tongfang chassis. Thus, users can find very similar designs and features from other resellers (Eluktronics, CyberPowerPC, Schenker, etc.) including the Schenker XMG Neo 17 or XMG Core 17.

Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Processor
Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 120 W PL2 / Short Burst, 120 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake H45
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU - 16384 MB, Core: 1605 MHz, Memory: 1750 MHz, 165 W TDP, 471.96, Manual and Optimus switch
Memory
32768 MB 
, DDR4-3200, 22-22-22-52, Dual-Channel
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, BOE0977, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM570
Storage
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, 1024 GB 
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
4 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm headphones, 3.5 mm microphone, Card Reader: MicroSD
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500/5000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19.81 x 393.95 x 260.8 ( = 0.78 x 15.51 x 10.27 in)
Battery
91 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
2.254 kg ( = 79.51 oz / 4.97 pounds), Power Supply: 846 g ( = 29.84 oz / 1.87 pounds)
Price
2500 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

potential competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Best Price
88 %
09/2021
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg19.81 mm17.30"2560x1440
90 %
07/2021
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
i9-11900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"2560x1440
84 %
06/2021
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
i7-10870H, GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg30.05 mm17.30"2560x1440
85 %
01/2021
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
R7 5800H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg27 mm17.30"2560x1440
84 %
12/2020
Schenker Compact 17
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
2.9 kg29.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
84 %
07/2020
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
2.3 kg18.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case

The chassis may not be as flashy as an Asus Zephyrus S or MSI GS75, but it certainly feels stronger and more rigid. The base doesn't yield or creak when attempting to twist its corners for strong first impressions. The lid and hinges, however, could have been stiffer to reduce teetering when adjusting angles. The thicker Asus ROG Strix laptops have larger hinges for a better sense of longevity.

, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Dimensions are nearly identical to the Razer Blade Pro. Weight, however, is almost half a kilogram lighter in favor of the Maingear. The lack of a vapor chamber cooler in the Maingear is likely responsible for the lighter weight.

Fingerprints readily accumulate all around the chassis
Fingerprints readily accumulate all around the chassis
Lid opened to maximum angle (~130 degrees)
Lid opened to maximum angle (~130 degrees)
Hinges are not very rigid and so the display will teeter when adjusting angles
Hinges are not very rigid and so the display will teeter when adjusting angles
Aluminum outer lid and keyboard deck with plastic bottom
Aluminum outer lid and keyboard deck with plastic bottom
Tapered edges for a thinner appearance
Tapered edges for a thinner appearance
Lots of ventilation grilles all around the rear of the system
Lots of ventilation grilles all around the rear of the system
399 mm / 15.7 inch 275 mm / 10.8 inch 29.9 mm / 1.177 inch 2.9 kg6.39 lbs395.7 mm / 15.6 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 30.05 mm / 1.183 inch 2.5 kg5.61 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 261 mm / 10.3 inch 27 mm / 1.063 inch 2.5 kg5.55 lbs396 mm / 15.6 inch 259 mm / 10.2 inch 18.9 mm / 0.744 inch 2.3 kg5.11 lbs394 mm / 15.5 inch 264 mm / 10.4 inch 19.9 mm / 0.783 inch 2.8 kg6.1 lbs393.95 mm / 15.5 inch 260.8 mm / 10.3 inch 19.81 mm / 0.78 inch 2.3 kg4.97 lbs

Connectivity

Port options are nearly identical to the Tongfang GM7ZG7S or GM7MG0R but with one notable exception: our Maingear chassis integrates a MicroSD reader instead of a full-size one. Thunderbolt 4 is natively supported via the Intel chipset unlike on AMD-powered laptops.

Unfortunately, the laptop cannot be recharged via USB-C even after testing out multiple USB-C adapters.

Front: No ports
Front: No ports
Right: MicroSD reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1
Right: MicroSD reader, 2x USB-A 3.1 Gen. 1
Rear: USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4, HDMI, 2.5 Gbps RJ-45, AC adapter
Rear: USB-C w/ Thunderbolt 4, HDMI, 2.5 Gbps RJ-45, AC adapter
Left: Kensington lock, USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones
Left: Kensington lock, USB-A 3.1 Gen. 2, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm earphones

SD Card Reader

Transfer rates are average from the integrated MicroSD reader. Moving 1 GB of pictures from our UHS-II test card to desktop takes about 14 seconds compared to less than half that on the MSI GS75.

One of the few MicroSD readers where the card must be inserted upside-down. Additionally, the reader is not spring-loaded and so the card sill protrudes when fully inserted
One of the few MicroSD readers where the card must be inserted upside-down. Additionally, the reader is not spring-loaded and so the card sill protrudes when fully inserted
SDCardreader Transfer Speed
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
204.8 MB/s ∼100% +174%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
183 (181.31min - 182.94max) MB/s ∼89% +145%
Schenker Compact 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
156.4 MB/s ∼76% +109%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
83 MB/s ∼41% +11%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
  (AV Pro V60)
74.8 MB/s ∼37%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
18.46 MB/s ∼9% -75%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
 
256.95 MB/s ∼100% +191%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)
209.7 MB/s ∼82% +137%
Schenker Compact 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.2 MB/s ∼75% +118%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
90 MB/s ∼35% +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
  (AV Pro V60)
88.3 MB/s ∼34%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
  (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
20.54 MB/s ∼8% -77%

Communication

A removable Intel AX201 WLAN module comes standard for Bluetooth 5.2 and Wi-Fi 6 compatibility
A removable Intel AX201 WLAN module comes standard for Bluetooth 5.2 and Wi-Fi 6 compatibility
Networking
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1541 (1418min - 1606max) MBit/s ∼100% +35%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1350 MBit/s ∼88% +19%
Schenker Compact 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1275 (609min - 681max) MBit/s ∼83% +12%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1270 (1080min - 1388max) MBit/s ∼82% +12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1138 (921min - 1230max) MBit/s ∼74%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
636 (325min - 728max) MBit/s ∼41% -44%
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1711 (861min - 1776max) MBit/s ∼100% +21%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1416 (1350min - 1459max) MBit/s ∼83%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1370 MBit/s ∼80% -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1177 (773min - 1353max) MBit/s ∼69% -17%
Schenker Compact 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
914 (877min - 940max) MBit/s ∼53% -35%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
MediaTek MT7921
698 (529min - 748max) MBit/s ∼41% -51%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450145913971350145114491435141313821418142113911411140814351413144314241419142014161440143814121376141614141405135714271418145913971350145114491435141313821418142113911411140814351413144314241419142014161440143814121376141614141405135714271418114711211114118711521230118611611169115011911073116012041060921117311521175954119011761190113311511161118410769861209Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1415 (1350-1459)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1138 (921-1230)

Webcam

While there is IR for Windows Hello compatibility, the 720p webcam integrates no privacy shutter.

ColorChecker
10.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
19.6 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
12.4 ∆E
20.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17: 13.84 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 20.47 ∆E

Maintenance

The bottom panel pops off fairly easily after removing the ten Philips screws underneath. Owners have direct access to the battery, both M.2 2280 slots, both RAM slots, and the WLAN module.

Accessories and Warranty

There are no extras in the retail box other than the AC adapter, paperwork, and a couple of Maingear logo stickers. The standard one-year limited warranty applies with extension options from Maingear.

Input Devices

Keyboard

Key feedback and travel could have been firmer and deeper especially for a gaming laptop. Though not as light or shallow as a cheap Asus VivoBook, more give on the keys could have improved the gaming and typing experience. Feedback is more comparable to an Asus Zephyrus than on an MSI GT or GS model.

Touchpad

The clickpad is a bit smaller than the one on the Razer Blade Pro (13.3 x 7.5 cm vs. 13 x 8 cm). Feedback, however, is stronger and not as spongy on the Maingear.

Four-zone RGB lighting instead of per-key RGB
Four-zone RGB lighting instead of per-key RGB
Clickpad is slightly rubberized for a textured feel with very little sticking. Expect some noticeable fingerprint buildup over time
Clickpad is slightly rubberized for a textured feel with very little sticking. Expect some noticeable fingerprint buildup over time
Key feedback is not as soft as a typical Ultrabook while being not as firm as an HP Spectre. Clatter from the Space and Enter keys is moderately loud
Key feedback is not as soft as a typical Ultrabook while being not as firm as an HP Spectre. Clatter from the Space and Enter keys is moderately loud
Numpad and arrow keys are slightly narrower than the main QWERTY keys
Numpad and arrow keys are slightly narrower than the main QWERTY keys

Display

Our Vector Pro uses the same NE173QHM-NY2 IPS panel from BOE as found on the Schenker XMG Core 17 meaning both laptops share similar display attributes. Response times are fast with good brightness, contrast levels, and refresh rates to represent a high-end 1440p panel designed for gaming. BOE has a newer NE173QHM-NY3 panel with even faster response times and better colors as found on the Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703 and so it's a bit disappointing that our Maingear is using an older version.

Matte panel with no edge-to-edge glass protection
Matte panel with no edge-to-edge glass protection
Narrow bezels
Narrow bezels
Matte subpixels are just slightly grainy and not as sharp as glossy
Matte subpixels are just slightly grainy and not as sharp as glossy
Very minor uneven backlight bleeding
Very minor uneven backlight bleeding
358.2
cd/m²
372.3
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
351.9
cd/m²
389.7
cd/m²
370
cd/m²
327.6
cd/m²
379.3
cd/m²
345.7
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE NE173QHM-NY2
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 389.7 cd/m² Average: 363.2 cd/m² Minimum: 20.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 84 %
Center on Battery: 389.7 cd/m²
Contrast: 829:1 (Black: 0.47 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.93 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.5, calibrated: 1.31
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.64-98 Ø5.7
71.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
BOE NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
BOE099D (BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY3), IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
BOE CQ NE173QHM-NY2, IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
BOE NE173QHM-NY2 (BOE0977), IPS, 17.30, 2560x1440
Schenker Compact 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.0, IPS, 17.30, 3840x2160
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
Sharp LQ173M1JW05, IPS, 17.30, 1920x1080
Display
17%
-3%
0%
19%
4%
Display P3 Coverage
70.7
94.2
33%
68.08
-4%
70.46
0%
84.43
19%
75.55
7%
sRGB Coverage
99.4
98.7
-1%
98.46
-1%
99.47
0%
99.9
1%
99.78
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
71.7
84.4
18%
69.35
-3%
71.85
0%
98.04
37%
75.05
5%
Response Times
51%
5%
5%
-197%
57%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
15.6 (8.4, 7.2)
4.8
69%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-8%
16.8 (8.4, 8.4)
-8%
51 (25, 26)
-227%
5 (2.2, 2.8)
68%
Response Time Black / White *
12 (6.8, 5.2)
8
33%
10 (4.8, 5.2)
17%
10 (4, 6)
17%
32 (18, 14)
-167%
6.6 (2.6, 4)
45%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-11%
-7%
4%
-40%
3%
Brightness middle
389.7
322
-17%
370
-5%
410
5%
437
12%
299.4
-23%
Brightness
363
288
-21%
333
-8%
381
5%
413
14%
299
-18%
Brightness Distribution
84
72
-14%
84
0%
88
5%
88
5%
84
0%
Black Level *
0.47
0.3
36%
0.38
19%
0.37
21%
0.6
-28%
0.31
34%
Contrast
829
1073
29%
974
17%
1108
34%
728
-12%
966
17%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
1.93
3.05
-58%
2.41
-25%
2.55
-32%
4.28
-122%
1.82
6%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
6.84
5.23
24%
7.32
-7%
4.33
37%
7.65
-12%
3.91
43%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 calibrated *
1.31
1.92
-47%
1.19
9%
1.28
2%
3.41
-160%
1.59
-21%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
2.4
3.11
-30%
3.9
-63%
3.4
-42%
3.8
-58%
2.7
-13%
Gamma
2.12 104%
2.13 103%
2.287 96%
2.275 97%
2.49 88%
2.18 101%
CCT
6658 98%
6553 99%
7302 89%
6637 98%
7363 88%
6837 95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
84
69
72
87
67.1
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99
93
95
100
99.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)
19% / 4%
-2% / -4%
3% / 3%
-73% / -50%
21% / 11%

* ... smaller is better

Color space covers sRGB entirely and approximately 72 percent of AdobeRGB. Higher resolution 4K IPS panels tend to offer deeper colors albeit at the cost of slower refresh rates and response times.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3

Colors and grayscale are fairly accurate out of the box suggesting no end-user tinkering is really necessary. Nonetheless, our own calibration with an X-Rite colorimeter would improve average grayscale values just slightly across the board.

Grayscale before calibration
Grayscale before calibration
Saturation Sweeps before calibration (against P3)
Saturation Sweeps before calibration (against P3)
ColorChecker before calibration (against P3)
ColorChecker before calibration (against P3)
Grayscale after calibration
Grayscale after calibration
Saturation Sweeps after calibration (against P3)
Saturation Sweeps after calibration (against P3)
ColorChecker after calibration (against P3)
ColorChecker after calibration (against P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
12 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.8 ms rise
↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (23.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 7.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 15 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (37.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 15315 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 2500000) Hz was measured.

Outdoor visibility is better than on most 17.3-inch gaming laptops since maximum brightness is closer to 400 nits instead of the usual 300 nits. You'll still want to avoid direct sunlight, however, or else the screen will wash out.

Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade from extreme angles
Wide IPS viewing angles. Colors and contrast degrade from extreme angles
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors under shade
Outdoors on a bright overcast day
Outdoors on a bright overcast day

Performance

The Maingear squeezes in a 165 W GeForce RTX 3080 GPU despite its compact design to be similar to the GPU as found on the thicker Schenker XMG Ultra 17 in terms of target TGP. Resizable Bar, Dynamic Boost 2.0, and WhisperMode 2.0 are all supported while Advanced Optimus and internal G-Sync are not. Thus, a manual switch is available via the Maingear NODE Control Center software to toggle between dGPU mode (i.e., full GPU performance mode) or Optimus mode. We recommend users become familiar with this software as many system-specific settings and LED features are toggled here.

Our system was set to Turbo mode and dGPU mode prior to running any performance benchmarks below for the highest possible scores.

 

Processor

CPU performance is excellent and where we expect it to be relative to other laptops equipped with the same processor. Users upgrading from an older Core i7-10750H or Core i7-10875H laptop will see a performance boost of roughly 40 percent and 20 percent, respectively. The competing Ryzen 7 5800H is slightly faster in multi-threaded loads while being slightly slower in single-threaded loads than our Core i7-11800H.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

011022033044055066077088099011001210132014301540165017601870198020901866.631871.521780.311755.161758.41759.091761.571772.111765.691711.821762.041784.761734.231751.621767.411759.791768.581731.31723.921753.691746.81750.091736.411755.311759.011747.111746.951757.471755.851740.421726.741755.71748.41742.081743.831762.581757.551763.91724.731756.471761.571753.541740.191749.481715.051775.11749.171730.181724.141735.211845.871803.911769.751720.871721.171749.71750.551767.721739.051726.741733.71751.241742.921769.911752.161758.161721.761763.981728.911739.431766.471724.511764.681739.2817311773.441748.251739.051757.551741.021758.241762.811751.851761.81746.341732.51744.441742.161767.331763.511752.931744.5917261760.721731.981766.241741.251730.481740.491756.471822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.941866.631871.521780.311755.161758.41759.091761.571772.111765.691711.821762.041784.761734.231751.621767.411759.791768.581731.31723.921753.691746.81750.091736.411755.311759.011747.111746.951757.471755.851740.421726.741755.71748.41742.081743.831762.581757.551763.91724.731756.471761.571753.541740.191749.481715.051775.11749.171730.181724.141735.211845.871803.911769.751720.871721.171749.71750.551767.721739.051726.741733.71751.241742.921769.911752.161758.161721.761763.981728.911739.431766.471724.511764.681739.2817311773.441748.251739.051757.551741.021758.241762.811751.851761.81746.341732.51744.441742.161767.331763.511752.931744.5917261760.721731.981766.241741.251730.481740.491756.471822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.941866.631871.521780.311755.161758.41759.091761.571772.111765.691711.821762.041784.761734.231751.621767.411759.791768.581731.31723.921753.691746.81750.091736.411755.311759.011747.111746.951757.471755.851740.421726.741755.71748.41742.081743.831762.581757.551763.91724.731756.471761.571753.541740.191749.481715.051775.11749.171730.181724.141735.211845.871803.911769.751720.871721.171749.71750.551767.721739.051726.741733.71751.241742.921769.911752.161758.161721.761763.981728.911739.431766.471724.511764.681739.2817311773.441748.251739.051757.551741.021758.241762.811751.851761.81746.341732.51744.441742.161767.331763.511752.931744.5917261760.721731.981766.241741.251730.481740.491756.471822.571742.081723.171721.241695.631690.691681.661676.871678.841671.821672.81676.021673.921668.541662.931663.411673.011656.251652.071648.061645.141648.461650.371662.11666.62180.072090.082104.272063.772067.722163.682144.3121482093.042064.732165.212043.842143.052160.992098.862070.612183.762151.812081.492062.072163.452153.22167.432087.362059.94Tooltip
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17 Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1755 (1711.82-1871.52)
Dell XPS 17 9710 Core i7 RTX 3060 Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1750 (1720.87-1845.87)
MSI Katana GF76 11UE Intel Core i7-11800H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø1681 (1645.14-1822.57)
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD Intel Core i9-11900H; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø2117 (2043.84-2183.76)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender 2.79: BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.3: 64 Bit Single-Core Score | 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
5055 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5023 Points ∼99% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
4990 Points ∼99% +16%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
4776 Points ∼94% +11%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3306 - 5408, n=25)
4588 Points ∼91% +7%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4552 Points ∼90% +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
4304 Points ∼85%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
3531 Points ∼70% -18%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
3027 Points ∼60% -30%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
2968 Points ∼59% -31%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
2308 Points ∼46% -46%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1397 Points ∼28% -68%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
634 Points ∼100% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
608 Points ∼96% +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
581 Points ∼92% 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points ∼92%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (520 - 586, n=22)
572 Points ∼90% -2%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
554 Points ∼87% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
491 Points ∼77% -15%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
490 Points ∼77% -16%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
484 Points ∼76% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
470 Points ∼74% -19%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points ∼66% -28%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
312 Points ∼49% -46%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Multi Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
14066 Points ∼100% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
13002 (12859.5min - 13002.3max) Points ∼92% +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
12720 Points ∼90% +6%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
12373 Points ∼88% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
11981 (11268.1min - 11981.1max) Points ∼85%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (8447 - 14088, n=23)
11875 Points ∼84% -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
9071 (8918.34min - 9070.5max) Points ∼64% -24%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
8250 Points ∼59% -31%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
7747 Points ∼55% -35%
Cinebench R23 / CPU (Single Core)
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1619 Points ∼100% +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1586 Points ∼98% +6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1503 Points ∼93%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1491 Points ∼92% -1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1386 - 1520, n=21)
1490 Points ∼92% -1%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
1423 Points ∼88% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
1270 Points ∼78% -16%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1253 Points ∼77% -17%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1227 Points ∼76% -18%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
2361 Points ∼100% +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
2184 (2043.84min - 2183.76max) Points ∼93% +17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
2059 (2019.39min - 2059.31max) Points ∼87% +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2041 (1981.96min - 2041.34max) Points ∼86% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (1342 - 2173, n=24)
1934 Points ∼82% +3%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1932 (1913.23min - 1932.18max) Points ∼82% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
1872 (1711.82min - 1871.52max) Points ∼79%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
1489 (1469.35min - 1489.04max) Points ∼63% -20%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1336 Points ∼57% -29%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1299 (1187.65min - 1299max) Points ∼55% -31%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1116 (974.99min - 1115.73max) Points ∼47% -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
548 Points ∼23% -71%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
254 Points ∼100% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
241 Points ∼95% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
239 Points ∼94% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
229 Points ∼90% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points ∼89%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (204 - 230, n=21)
225 Points ∼89% 0%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
209 Points ∼82% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points ∼80% -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
201 Points ∼79% -11%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
187 Points ∼74% -17%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points ∼68% -23%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
108 Points ∼43% -52%
Blender 2.79 / BMW27 CPU
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
528 Seconds * ∼100% -96%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
466 Seconds * ∼88% -73%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
358 Seconds * ∼68% -33%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
333 Seconds * ∼63% -23%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
302 Seconds * ∼57% -12%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
270 Seconds * ∼51%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (217 - 342, n=21)
266 Seconds * ∼50% +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
250 Seconds * ∼47% +7%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
248 Seconds * ∼47% +8%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
237 Seconds * ∼45% +12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
231 Seconds * ∼44% +14%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
227 Seconds * ∼43% +16%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
6174 MIPS ∼100% +14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
5795 MIPS ∼94% +7%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5664 MIPS ∼92% +5%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
5520 MIPS ∼89% +2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (5138 - 5716, n=21)
5470 MIPS ∼89% +1%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
5438 MIPS ∼88% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
5404 MIPS ∼88%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
5338 MIPS ∼86% -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
5321 MIPS ∼86% -2%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
4634 MIPS ∼75% -14%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4580 MIPS ∼74% -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2945 MIPS ∼48% -46%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
59182 MIPS ∼100% +10%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
57579 MIPS ∼97% +7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
57263 MIPS ∼97% +6%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
54172 MIPS ∼92% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
53817 MIPS ∼91%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
50428 MIPS ∼85% -6%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38156 - 56758, n=21)
49293 MIPS ∼83% -8%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
45258 MIPS ∼76% -16%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
39581 MIPS ∼67% -26%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
36771 MIPS ∼62% -32%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
29342 MIPS ∼50% -45%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
15146 MIPS ∼26% -72%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Single-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
1777 Points ∼100% +101%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
1648 Points ∼93% +87%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1529 Points ∼86% +73%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (882 - 1625, n=18)
1371 Points ∼77% +55%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
1333 Points ∼75% +51%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
1315 Points ∼74% +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
1191 Points ∼67% +35%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
1176 Points ∼66% +33%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1117 Points ∼63% +27%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
882 Points ∼50%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
703 Points ∼40% -20%
Geekbench 5.3 / 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
10482 Points ∼100% +215%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
9628 Points ∼92% +190%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
9294 Points ∼89% +180%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
8134 Points ∼78% +145%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
7864 Points ∼75% +137%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (3323 - 9851, n=18)
7302 Points ∼70% +120%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
6403 Points ∼61% +93%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
6394 Points ∼61% +92%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4897 Points ∼47% +47%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
3323 Points ∼32%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
2783 Points ∼27% -16%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
17.1 fps ∼100% +26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
16.7 fps ∼98% +23%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.8 fps ∼92% +16%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
14.8 fps ∼87% +9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (10.5 - 17.4, n=21)
14.1 fps ∼82% +4%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.6 fps ∼80%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
13.1 fps ∼77% -4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps ∼71% -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
10.7 fps ∼63% -21%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.2 fps ∼60% -25%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.2 fps ∼48% -40%
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
6.13 fps ∼36% -55%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
94.04 s * ∼100% -103%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
57.7 s * ∼61% -24%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
54.1 s * ∼58% -17%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
53.5 s * ∼57% -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
52.2 s * ∼56% -13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
49.3 s * ∼52% -6%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.4 s * ∼49%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (38.6 - 50.7, n=21)
45.9 s * ∼49% +1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
45.3 s * ∼48% +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
44.4 s * ∼47% +4%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
40.5 s * ∼43% +13%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo Legion 5 17IMH05
Intel Core i5-10300H
1.088 sec * ∼100% -90%
Schenker XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.679 sec * ∼62% -19%
Medion Erazer Beast X20
Intel Core i7-10870H
0.6 sec * ∼55% -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 2021 Touch 4K, i7-10875H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.587 sec * ∼54% -3%
Eluktronics RP-17
AMD Ryzen 7 4800H
0.582 sec * ∼53% -2%
Schenker XMG Core 17 Comet Lake
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.578 sec * ∼53% -1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.572 sec * ∼53%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H
  (0.548 - 0.605, n=21)
0.566 sec * ∼52% +1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Intel Core i9-11900H
0.53 sec * ∼49% +7%
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713QE-RB74
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
0.518 sec * ∼48% +9%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
Intel Core i9-11900K
0.4981 sec * ∼46% +13%
Medion Erazer Beast X25
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4926 sec * ∼45% +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1872 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
115 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
226 Points
Help

System Performance

PCMark 10 scores are very high and with a slight edge over most other gaming laptops likely due to the PCIe x4 NVMe SSD in our test unit
PCMark 10 scores are very high and with a slight edge over most other gaming laptops likely due to the PCIe x4 NVMe SSD in our test unit
PCMark 10 / Score
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7286 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (7073 - 7470, n=7)
7254 Points ∼100% 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7245 Points ∼99% -1%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
6983 Points ∼96% -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
6582 Points ∼90% -10%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6364 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
5685 Points ∼78% -22%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10839 Points ∼100%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10630 Points ∼98% -2%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10130 - 11064, n=7)
10511 Points ∼97% -3%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
10064 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10051 Points ∼93% -7%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9473 Points ∼87% -13%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9182 Points ∼85% -15%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8893 - 9803, n=7)
9244 Points ∼100% +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9182 Points ∼99% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
8893 Points ∼96%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
8849 Points ∼96% 0%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8549 Points ∼92% -4%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
8469 Points ∼92% -5%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7217 Points ∼78% -19%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10887 Points ∼100%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (10075 - 11323, n=7)
10667 Points ∼98% -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10573 Points ∼97% -3%
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
10389 Points ∼95% -5%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
9082 Points ∼83% -17%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8640 Points ∼79% -21%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
7526 Points ∼69% -31%
PCMark 10 Score
7286 points
Help

DPC Latency

LatencyMon shows minor DPC latency issues when opening multiple browser tabs on our homepage. 4K video playback at 60 FPS is otherwise smooth and with no dropped frames.

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
1820.7 μs * ∼100% -246%
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1444.5 μs * ∼79% -175%
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i7-10870H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
742.6 μs * ∼41% -41%
Schenker Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
595.7 μs * ∼33% -13%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
525.7 μs * ∼29%
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, i7-10875H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
364 μs * ∼20% +31%

* ... smaller is better

Storage Devices

Our test unit comes with a Samsung PM9A1 which is the manufacturer's premier PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD for consumers. Sequential read and write rates approach 7000 MB/s and 5200 MB/s, respectively, to be about 2x faster than on the Samsung PM981a series commonly found on previous generation flagship laptops.

CDM 8
CDM 8
AS SSD
AS SSD
System supports up to two M.2 2280 PCIe 4 SSDs
System supports up to two M.2 2280 PCIe 4 SSDs
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Asus ROG Zephyrus S17 GX703HSD
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Schenker XMG Core 17 (Early 2021)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
Schenker XMG Neo 17 (Early 2021, RTX 3070, 5800H)
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Schenker Compact 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
MSI GS75 10SF-609US
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G
AS SSD
7%
-38%
-28%
-28%
-50%
Seq Read
5366.88
5085
-5%
2875.85
-46%
3019.89
-44%
2879.15
-46%
2326.96
-57%
Seq Write
3965.48
4434
12%
2802.79
-29%
2631.23
-34%
2841.56
-28%
2479.16
-37%
4K Read
79.92
80.35
1%
55.33
-31%
60.35
-24%
51.64
-35%
45.46
-43%
4K Write
194.21
214.69
11%
106.9
-45%
171.59
-12%
142.48
-27%
157.4
-19%
4K-64 Read
2683.94
2572.6
-4%
1662.47
-38%
1410.3
-47%
1671.97
-38%
1049.71
-61%
4K-64 Write
3335.39
2972.36
-11%
2101.1
-37%
2324.17
-30%
2292.59
-31%
938.15
-72%
Access Time Read *
0.027
0.018
33%
0.067
-148%
0.045
-67%
0.034
-26%
0.076
-181%
Access Time Write *
0.066
0.02
70%
0.037
44%
0.024
64%
0.027
59%
0.071
-8%
Score Read
3301
3161
-4%
2005
-39%
1773
-46%
2012
-39%
1328
-60%
Score Write
3926
3631
-8%
2488
-37%
2759
-30%
2719
-31%
1343
-66%
Score Total
8847
8380
-5%
5520
-38%
5429
-39%
5760
-35%
3366
-62%
Copy ISO MB/s
2579.16
3238.69
26%
2028.86
-21%
2383.4
-8%
3091.91
20%
Copy Program MB/s
1132.84
898.63
-21%
691.17
-39%
602.86
-47%
733.08
-35%
Copy Game MB/s
2161.44
2171.21
0%
1513.01
-30%
872.5
-60%
1682.7
-22%
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
1%
-32%
-28%
-31%
-37%
Write 4K
227.2
244.2
7%
145.7
-36%
206.1
-9%
167.8
-26%
177.9
-22%
Read 4K
89
89.8
1%
51.34
-42%
53
-40%
53.48
-40%
47.42
-47%
Write Seq
4256
3036
-29%
3018
-29%
3073
-28%
2707
-36%
Read Seq
4364
2837
-35%
2575
-41%
2488
-43%
2369
-46%
Write 4K Q32T1
614.4
606.77
-1%
510.7
-17%
535.2
-13%
523.6
-15%
427.8
-30%
Read 4K Q32T1
658.9
657.86
0%
582.4
-12%
607.6
-8%
594.8
-10%
543.2
-18%
Write Seq Q32T1
5216
5269.7
1%
3294
-37%
3242
-38%
3324
-36%
2703
-48%
Read Seq Q32T1
7073
7090.6
0%
3522
-50%
3617
-49%
3564
-50%
3387
-52%
Write 4K Q8T8
2270.27
Read 4K Q8T8
2489.72
Total Average (Program / Settings)
4% / 5%
-35% / -36%
-28% / -28%
-30% / -29%
-44% / -46%

* ... smaller is better

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7073 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5216 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 658.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 614.4 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 4364 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 4256 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 227.2 MB/s

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0335670100513401675201023452680301533503685402043554690502553605695603063656201.466255.596260.636265.036267.346274.476280.346280.976281.186282.446284.546284.956291.046582.966588.836588.836590.096590.516590.726591.356591.566592.616593.036593.246594.086595.126595.546595.756597.646598.066598.96599.116599.116599.116599.536600.586600.796601.426601.626601.626602.676602.886603.36603.516603.726603.936604.146604.986605.616614.42Tooltip
: Ø6513 (6201.46-6614.42)

GPU Performance

Graphics performance falls short by around 15 percent when compared to the Schenker Ultra 17 even though each system comes with a 165 W TGP GeForce RTX 3080. A "proper" desktop RTX 3080 can perform anywhere between 40 to 60 percent faster than our mobile version. Even so, our GPU is about where we expect it to be after testing over 30 RTX 3080 laptops thus far.

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
Time Spy
Time Spy
Fire Strike
Fire Strike
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Port Royal
Port Royal
Cloud gate
Cloud gate
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
40910 Points ∼100% +40%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
30650 Points ∼75% +5%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
29194 Points ∼71%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (20538 - 32366, n=34)
28057 Points ∼69% -4%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
25597 Points ∼63% -12%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
23649 Points ∼58% -19%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
22820 Points ∼56% -22%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
21532 Points ∼53% -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
20874 Points ∼51% -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
19737 Points ∼48% -32%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
18877 Points ∼46% -35%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
16694 Points ∼41% -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17467 Points ∼100% +55%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
13144 Points ∼75% +17%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
11235 Points ∼64%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8920 - 13210, n=33)
11051 Points ∼63% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
9908 Points ∼57% -12%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9480 Points ∼54% -16%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
8906 Points ∼51% -21%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
8267 Points ∼47% -26%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
7901 Points ∼45% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7597 Points ∼43% -32%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
7582 Points ∼43% -33%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6374 Points ∼36% -43%
2560x1440 Time Spy Score
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
15712 Points ∼100% +42%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
13067 Points ∼83% +18%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
11052 Points ∼70%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (8737 - 13067, n=33)
10807 Points ∼69% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
9921 Points ∼63% -10%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
9177 Points ∼58% -17%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
8883 Points ∼57% -20%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
8100 Points ∼52% -27%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
8035 Points ∼51% -27%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
7778 Points ∼50% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
7475 Points ∼48% -32%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
6680 Points ∼43% -40%
2560x1440 Port Royal Graphics
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
11238 Points ∼100% +63%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
7991 Points ∼71% +16%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
6888 Points ∼61%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (5552 - 8032, n=21)
6823 Points ∼61% -1%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
5582 Points ∼50% -19%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
4835 Points ∼43% -30%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
4405 Points ∼39% -36%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
3598 Points ∼32% -48%
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
47287 Points ∼100% +25%
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
41696 Points ∼88% +11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (31288 - 43744, n=31)
38767 Points ∼82% +3%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
37714 Points ∼80%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
35128 Points ∼74% -7%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
32995 Points ∼70% -13%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
31826 Points ∼67% -16%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
29011 Points ∼61% -23%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
27613 Points ∼58% -27%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
27203 Points ∼58% -28%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
25793 Points ∼55% -32%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
23409 Points ∼50% -38%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Schenker XMG Ultra 17 Rocket Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i9-11900K
20233 Points ∼100% +19%
ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 ROG STRIX OC GAMING
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080, R9 5900X
17096 Points ∼84% 0%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H
17049 Points ∼84%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (13526 - 20233, n=30)
16744 Points ∼83% -2%
Alienware m17 R3 P45E
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, i9-10980HK
16243 Points ∼80% -5%
HP Omen 17-cb0020ng
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i9-9880H
15274 Points ∼75% -10%
Asus TUF Gaming F17 FX706HM
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU, i9-11900H
15274 Points ∼75% -10%
Asus Zephyrus S17 GX701LXS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H
14000 Points ∼69% -18%
Acer Nitro 5 AN517-41-R5Z7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, R7 5800H
13858 Points ∼68% -19%
Eluktronics RP-17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, R7 4800H
12972 Points ∼64% -24%
Lenovo Legion Y740-17IRHg-81UJ001VGE
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H
12569 Points ∼62% -26%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H
9419 Points ∼47% -45%
3DMark 11 Performance
29298 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
56574 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
23301 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
11052 points
Help
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (148 - 228, n=2)
188 fps ∼100% +2%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
184 fps ∼98%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (158 - 199, n=20)
178 fps ∼95% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (151 - 158, n=2)
155 fps ∼82% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (137 - 195, n=18)
154 fps ∼82% -16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
150 fps ∼80% -18%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (121 - 137, n=4)
130 fps ∼69% -29%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (125 - 127, n=2)
126 fps ∼67% -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (98.4 - 144, n=4)
118 fps ∼63% -36%
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (132 - 205, n=2)
169 fps ∼100% +17%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
144 fps ∼85%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (113 - 154, n=21)
136 fps ∼80% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (117 - 129, n=2)
123 fps ∼73% -15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (67 - 142, n=19)
111 fps ∼66% -23%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (100 - 106, n=5)
103 fps ∼61% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
 
103 fps ∼61% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (100 - 106, n=3)
103 fps ∼61% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (74 - 89.2, n=5)
82.3 fps ∼49% -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (78.1 - 87.6, n=5)
81.5 fps ∼48% -43%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (113 - 156, n=2)
135 fps ∼100% +25%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108 fps ∼80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (85.4 - 115, n=24)
103 fps ∼76% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
  (90.6 - 108, n=3)
99.2 fps ∼73% -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (62 - 103, n=24)
85.9 fps ∼64% -20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (77 - 80.6, n=3)
78.6 fps ∼58% -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (74 - 81.4, n=5)
77.7 fps ∼58% -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (67 - 80.8, n=2)
73.9 fps ∼55% -32%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (52 - 67.5, n=7)
61.8 fps ∼46% -43%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (55.4 - 63.9, n=5)
59 fps ∼44% -45%
GTA V
1024x768 Lowest Settings possible
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (182 - 187, n=2)
185 fps ∼100% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
184 (2.63min, 143P1 - 457max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 186, n=24)
181 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (179 - 180, n=2)
180 fps ∼97% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (164 - 185, n=19)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (163 - 179, n=3)
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (153 - 178, n=4)
171 fps ∼92% -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
 
164 fps ∼89% -11%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (153 - 168, n=5)
160 fps ∼86% -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
  (140 - 171, n=2)
156 fps ∼84% -15%
1920x1080 Lowest Settings possible
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
184 (2.89min, 125P1 - 476max) fps ∼100%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (180 - 187, n=2)
184 fps ∼100% 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (173 - 186, n=23)
180 fps ∼98% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (176 - 177, n=2)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
  (174 - 179, n=2)
177 fps ∼96% -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (150 - 185, n=18)
174 fps ∼95% -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
 
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
  (168 - 175, n=4)
173 fps ∼94% -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
  (124 - 163, n=3)
148 fps ∼80% -20%
1366x768 Normal/Off AF:4x
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
  (175 - 187, n=2)
181 fps ∼100% +1%
Maingear Vector Pro MG-VCP17
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
179 (4.18min, 125P1 - 463max) fps ∼99%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
  (167 - 182, n=20)
176 fps ∼97% -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
  (172 - 174, n=2)
173 fps ∼96% -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
  (153 - 180, n=15)
170 fps ∼94% -5%