Notebookcheck Logo

Schenker Compact 17 (Clevo PB71DF2-G) in review: A lot of performance with little heat development

Desktop replacement.

The Schenker Compact 17 offers powerful hardware, 32 GB of RAM (dual-channel mode), a 4K display, and a 1 TB NVMe SSD. In addition, there's an extensive range of connections and the possibility to install up to three storage devices.
Comet Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop Thunderbolt Windows

Schenker's 17.3-inch gaming laptop is powered by a Core i7-10875H octa-core processor and a GeForce RTX 2070 Super graphics core. It's the identically built sibling model of the XMG Pro 17. Competitors include devices like the Aorus 17G XB, the Asus Strix G17 G712LWS, the Razer Blade Pro 17, and the Gigabyte Aero 17 XB. Both of the latter devices have a 4K display on board like the Compact 17.

SCHENKER Compact 17
Processor
Intel Core i7-10875H 8 x 2.3 - 5.1 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Comet Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 1380 MHz, RAM: 1750 MHz, 115 W TDP, GDDR6, 27.21.14.5730 (Nvidia 457.30), Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR4-3200, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AU Optronics B173ZAN03.0, IPS, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel HM470
Storage
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB, 1024 GB 
, 2x M.2, 1x SATA; RAID 0/1, 913 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC1220 @ Intel Comet Point PCH - cAVS
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combined headset port, 2-in-1 (mic in, optical S/PDIF), Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 29.9 x 399 x 275 ( = 1.18 x 15.71 x 10.83 in)
Battery
62 Wh, 5500 mAh Lithium-Ion, 11.1 V
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: 2.1 system, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, Manual, thermal Pad, DVD (drivers), USB stick (drivers), a few stickers, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.9 kg ( = 102.29 oz / 6.39 pounds), Power Supply: 816 g ( = 28.78 oz / 1.8 pounds)
Price
2 Euro
Links
SCHENKER homepage
SCHENKER notebook section
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
84 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2020
SCHENKER Compact 17
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		2.9 kg29.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
87 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2020
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.7 kg21 mm17.30"3840x2160
86.7 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2019
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q		2.8 kg19.9 mm17.30"3840x2160
83.1 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2020
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile		2.8 kg26.5 mm17.30"1920x1080
86.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2020
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q		2.7 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

Case and connectivity - The Schenker laptop offers many ports

The matte black, soberly designed chassis is made of metal (back of the lid, top of the base unit) and plastic (display frame, bottom cover). The battery is removable (it's secured by two screws). The hardware of the laptop can be accessed after removing the base cover. The case is mostly well manufactured - with one exception: The tapered corners of the lid (metal) are not optimally chamfered. A risk of injury can't be ruled out here.

The Compact 17 has three USB Type-A ports (USB 3.2 Gen 1) and two USB Type-C ports (1x Thunderbolt 3, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2). The latter support DisplayPort via USB-C. Therefore, the laptop has a total of four video outputs together with the HDMI port and the Mini DisplayPort. The three DisplayPorts offer G-Sync functionality.

The SD memory card reader (reference card: 64 GB Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II SDXC) belongs to the faster representatives of its kind with maximum transfer rates of 156.6 MB/s (transferring 250 jpg image files of 5 MB each) and 192.2 MB/s (copying large data blocks).

The WLAN chip (Intel AX200) supports the 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax standards and provides Bluetooth 5 functionality. The data rates determined under optimal conditions (no other WLAN devices nearby, short distance between laptop and server PC; router: Netgear Nighthawk AX12) are very good.

Size comparison

❌
405 mm / 15.9 in 276 mm / 10.9 in 26 mm / 1.024 in 2.7 kg6.02 lbs399 mm / 15.7 in 275 mm / 10.8 in 30 mm / 1.181 in 2.8 kg6.19 lbs399 mm / 15.7 in 275 mm / 10.8 in 29.9 mm / 1.177 in 2.9 kg6.39 lbs399 mm / 15.7 in 293 mm / 11.5 in 26.5 mm / 1.043 in 2.8 kg6.16 lbs396 mm / 15.6 in 270 mm / 10.6 in 21 mm / 0.827 in 2.7 kg5.86 lbs395 mm / 15.6 in 260 mm / 10.2 in 19.9 mm / 0.783 in 2.8 kg6.06 lbs297 mm / 11.7 in 210 mm / 8.27 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 5.7 g0.01257 lbs

Port configuration

Left side: Cable lock slot, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), 2-in-1 (mic in, optical S/PDIF), headphone output
Left side: Cable lock slot, USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), 2-in-1 (mic in, optical S/PDIF), headphone output
Right side: Thunderbolt 3 (Type-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A)
Right side: Thunderbolt 3 (Type-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A)
The memory card reader (SD) is found on the front.
The memory card reader (SD) is found on the front.
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), power supply
Back: Gigabit Ethernet, HDMI 2.0, Mini DisplayPort 1.4, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (Type-C; DisplayPort), USB 3.2 Gen 1 (Type-A), power supply
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
212 MB/s +36%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
207 MB/s +32%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
203 MB/s +30%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
181.3 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER Compact 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
156.4 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 204, n=69, last 2 years)
95.6 MB/s -39%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Aorus 17G XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
247 MB/s +29%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
245 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
219 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
198 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER Compact 17
  (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
192.2 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 261, n=68, last 2 years)
121.8 MB/s -37%
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1410 MBit/s +11%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1410 MBit/s +11%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1275 (609min - 681max) MBit/s
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s -1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1190 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (447 - 1645, n=127)
1104 MBit/s -13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
647 (652min) MBit/s -49%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1620 MBit/s +77%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1390 MBit/s +52%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1280 MBit/s +40%
Aorus 17G XB
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650x Wireless Network Adapter (200NGW)
1260 MBit/s +38%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
  (523 - 1684, n=128)
1191 MBit/s +30%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
914 (877min - 940max) MBit/s
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
655 MBit/s -28%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
SCHENKER Compact 17 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (877-940)
SCHENKER Compact 17 Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø657 (609-681)

Input devices - Chiclet keyboard with RGB backlighting

The flat, smooth keys of the backlit chiclet keyboard (RGB lighting) have a medium travel and a clear pressure point. The keyboard visibly bounces during typing. All in all, Schenker delivers a keyboard suitable for everyday use here. The surface of the multi-touch capable touchpad (about 10.8 x 6.1 cm) makes it easy for fingers to glide on it. The pad responds to input in the corners as well. The two separate mouse buttons offer a short travel and a clear pressure point.

Compact 17 input devices
Compact 17 input devices

Display - 4K IPS

Pixel grid
Pixel grid

While the matte 17.3-inch display (3840x2160 pixels, 60 Hz) delivers a good brightness value (412.8 cd/m²), there's a lot of room for improvement in terms of contrast (728:1). We consider values beyond 1,000:1 to be good. Positive: The display doesn't show any PWM flickering.

410
cd/m²		419
cd/m²		406
cd/m²
396
cd/m²		437
cd/m²		412
cd/m²
402
cd/m²		444
cd/m²		389
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 444 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 412.8 cd/m² Minimum: 25 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 444 cd/m²
Contrast: 728:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86, calibrated: 3.41
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
87% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
98% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
84.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
SCHENKER Compact 17
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.0, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
AUO B173ZAN03.2 (AUO329B), IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
AU Optronics B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
LG Philips LP173WFG-SPB3, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		Aorus 17G XB
AU Optronics B173HAN05.0 (AUO509D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
AU Optronics B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
1%
0%
-19%
-15%
-23%
Display P3 Coverage
84.4
86.5
2%
84.8
0%
65.2
-23%
70.6
-16%
62.8
-26%
sRGB Coverage
99.9
100
0%
99.9
0%
96.8
-3%
97.2
-3%
89.8
-10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
98
100
2%
98.6
1%
66.4
-32%
72.8
-26%
64.2
-34%
Response Times
6%
69%
70%
66%
65%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
51 ?(25, 26)
55.2 ?(26.8, 28.4)
-8%
15.2 ?(8.4, 6.8)
70%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
72%
16 ?(7.6, 8.4)
69%
16.8 ?(8.4, 8.4)
67%
Response Time Black / White *
32 ?(18, 14)
26 ?(9.2, 16.8)
19%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
67%
10.4 ?(5.2, 5.2)
67%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
62%
12 ?(6.8, 5.2)
62%
PWM Frequency
Screen
40%
-2%
10%
30%
-1%
Brightness middle
437
487
11%
346.7
-21%
323
-26%
293
-33%
274
-37%
Brightness
413
475
15%
332
-20%
300
-27%
285
-31%
273
-34%
Brightness Distribution
88
95
8%
91
3%
89
1%
95
8%
95
8%
Black Level *
0.6
0.38
37%
0.27
55%
0.31
48%
0.24
60%
0.26
57%
Contrast
728
1282
76%
1284
76%
1042
43%
1221
68%
1054
45%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.28
1.19
72%
5.62
-31%
3.01
30%
1.27
70%
4.62
-8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
7.65
2.43
68%
9.36
-22%
7.65
-0%
2.24
71%
7.66
-0%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
3.41
0.5
85%
3.81
-12%
1
71%
1.06
69%
1.93
43%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
1.45
62%
5.5
-45%
3.8
-0%
1.34
65%
5.3
-39%
Gamma
2.49 88%
2.21 100%
2.25 98%
2.154 102%
2.38 92%
2.34 94%
CCT
7363 88%
6557 99%
6175 105%
7507 87%
6542 99%
7619 85%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
87
88
1%
87.2
0%
66
-24%
73
-16%
58
-33%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
100
0%
100
0%
90
-10%
94
-6%
90
-10%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
16% / 28%
22% / 8%
20% / 12%
27% / 26%
14% / 3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 85 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 25 ms rise
↘ 26 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Out of the box, the display shows a decent color reproduction. However, the target (Delta E less than 3) isn't met with a color deviation of almost 4.3. The display doesn't suffer from a blue tint. Furthermore, calibration reduces the color deviation to 3.41 and provides a more balanced representation of grayscales. Good: The display covers 100% of the sRGB color space.

CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - ColorChecker
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Grayscales
CalMAN - Color saturation
CalMAN - Color saturation
CalMAN - ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN - ColorChecker (calibrated)
CalMAN - Grayscales (calibrated)
CalMAN - Grayscales (calibrated)
CalMAN - Color saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN - Color saturation (calibrated)

The viewing-angle stable IPS panel can be read from any position. Moreover, it's certainly possible to read the display outdoors.

The Compact 17 outdoors (shot in an overcast sky).
The Compact 17 outdoors (shot in an overcast sky).

Performance - Sufficient for all application areas

Schenker's 17.3-inch gaming laptop brings every modern game smoothly onto the screen and also cuts a fine figure in all other application areas. Our test device costs about 3,000 Euros (~$3,636). The device can be individually customized in Schenker's online store.

Test conditions

The preinstalled Control Center allows adjusting the fan control and selecting a performance profile, among other things. We performed all tests with automatic fan control and under the "Entertainment Mode" performance profile. We also ran some benchmarks under the "Performance Mode" profile. The "GPU Overclocking" function is only available when Optimus is disabled.

Processor

The Core i7-10875H octa-core processor (Comet Lake) operates at a base clock speed of 2.3 GHz. An increase to 4.3 GHz (eight cores) or 5.1 GHz (one core) is possible via Turbo. Hyper-Threading (two threads per core) is supported.

The CPU tests of the Cinebench R15 benchmark are processed at 2.6 to 4.2 GHz (multithread) and 4.2 to 5.1 GHz (single-thread), respectively. On battery power, the speeds are 1.8 to 1.9 GHz (multithread) and 1.8 to 3.9 GHz (single-thread), respectively.

CPU-Z
CPU-Z
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
HWiNFO
HWiNFO

We verify if the CPU Turbo is also consistently used when plugged in by running the Cinebench R15 benchmark's multithread test in a continuous loop for at least 30 minutes. Turbo is used.

"Performance Mode" lets the Turbo clock rates increase significantly for a short time. Under prolonged load, the speeds are only just above those of the "Entertainment Mode".

05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650170017501800Tooltip
SCHENKER Compact 17 Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1308 (1280.29-1495.1)
SCHENKER Compact 17 Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H; Leistungsmodus: Ø1380 (1326.74-1768.97)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1572 (1548.11-1671.4)
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø1024 (1016.29-1117.57)
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS Intel Core i7-10750H, Intel Core i7-10750H: Ø1296 (1270.16-1339.9)
Aorus 17G XB Intel Core i7-10875H, Intel Core i7-10875H: Ø1613 (1597.83-1832.68)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G Intel Core i7-9750H, Intel Core i7-9750H: Ø988 (974.99-1115.73)
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop ("Performance Mode")
CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop ("Performance Mode")
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
212 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1495 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
151.7 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3281 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
484 Points
Help
Cinebench R15 | Blender | 7-Zip 18.03 | Cinebench R20 | Geekbench 5.5 | HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 | LibreOffice | R Benchmark 2.5
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 343, n=146, last 2 years)
283 Points +33%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
220 Points +4%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
212 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
211 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (190 - 220, n=37)
204 Points -4%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
203 Points -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
202 Points -5%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
175 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
173 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (1537 - 6271, n=149, last 2 years)
3515 Points +135%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1833 (1597.83min - 1832.68max) Points +23%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
1769 Points +18%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1671 (1548.11min - 1671.4max) Points +12%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1003 - 1833, n=38)
1554 Points +4%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
1495 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1344 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1116 (974.99min - 1115.73max) Points -25%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
1094 Points -27%
Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
466 Seconds * -38%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
347 Seconds * -3%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
338 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (259 - 535, n=30)
327 Seconds * +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
317 Seconds * +6%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
304 Seconds * +10%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
290 Seconds * +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (80 - 517, n=140, last 2 years)
166.7 Seconds * +51%
7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7573, n=144, last 2 years)
6311 MIPS +9%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
5780 MIPS
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
5762 MIPS 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5413 MIPS -6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5071 - 5780, n=31)
5360 MIPS -7%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
5345 MIPS -8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
5118 MIPS -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4580 MIPS -21%
7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 144064, n=144, last 2 years)
85910 MIPS +104%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
48662 MIPS +15%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
46702 MIPS +11%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
44829 MIPS +6%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (29844 - 49562, n=31)
43117 MIPS +2%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
42211 MIPS
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
36718 MIPS -13%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
29342 MIPS -30%
Cinebench R20
CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 870, n=146, last 2 years)
737 Points +52%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
524 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
499 Points +3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
494 Points +2%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
486 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (430 - 524, n=32)
486 Points 0%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
484 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
431 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
421 Points -13%
CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 16108, n=146, last 2 years)
8768 Points +167%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
4165 Points +27%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3823 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1986 - 4176, n=32)
3455 Points +5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
3431 Points +5%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
3281 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
3247 Points -1%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H
2328 Points -29%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
2308 Points -30%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2423, n=143, last 2 years)
1932 Points +43%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
1367 Points +1%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
1350 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (1233 - 1371, n=29)
1304 Points -3%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1293 Points -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
1290 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
1233 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
1117 Points -17%
Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 27010, n=143, last 2 years)
15449 Points +100%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
8605 Points +11%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
8139 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (5715 - 8620, n=29)
7734 Points 0%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
7719 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
7431 Points -4%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
6370 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
4897 Points -37%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (7.7 - 44.3, n=144, last 2 years)
24.7 fps +125%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.8 fps +16%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
12.3 fps +12%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
12.1 fps +10%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (7.27 - 14.1, n=27)
11.7 fps +6%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
11 fps
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
10.8 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
8.2 fps -25%
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
84.3 s * -54%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
55.4 s * -1%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
54.8 s *
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
53.1 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (30.2 - 84.3, n=30)
50.3 s * +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 96.6, n=142, last 2 years)
47.5 s * +13%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
43.1 s * +21%
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H
0.679 sec * -22%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H
0.609 sec * -10%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.583 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H
  (0.546 - 0.662, n=29)
0.582 sec * -5%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.556 sec * -0%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H
0.555 sec *
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
0.552 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3551 - 0.759, n=145, last 2 years)
0.4359 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

System performance

The system works fast and smoothly. The installed hardware provides more than enough computing power for all common application areas - gaming, video-editing, and image-processing don't pose a big challenge for the laptop. This is accompanied by good PCMark results.

The laptop has two memory slots.
The laptop has two memory slots.
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3561 points
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
6034 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4380 points
PCMark 10 Score
6364 points
Help
PCMark 10 | PCMark 8
PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=130, last 2 years)
7940 Points +25%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6571 Points +3%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6483 Points +2%
SCHENKER Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
6364 Points
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
6202 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (5447 - 6364, n=4)
5873 Points -8%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5262 Points -17%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4739 Points -26%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12600, n=130, last 2 years)
10761 Points +14%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10239 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
10024 Points +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
9927 Points +5%
SCHENKER Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
9473 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
9288 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (7547 - 9783, n=4)
9075 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
9033 Points -5%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=130, last 2 years)
9873 Points +15%
SCHENKER Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8549 Points
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8237 Points -4%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
8176 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (7534 - 8549, n=4)
8138 Points -5%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
8049 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
7362 Points -14%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
7357 Points -14%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming
  (7440 - 19351, n=130, last 2 years)
12959 Points +50%
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9128 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
9022 Points +4%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
8862 Points +3%
SCHENKER Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
8640 Points
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (5442 - 8640, n=4)
7580 Points -12%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
5290 Points -39%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
4344 Points -50%
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming
  (4748 - 5883, n=7, last 2 years)
5434 Points +53%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
4412 Points +24%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR
4255 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (3561 - 4405, n=2)
3983 Points +12%
SCHENKER Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
3561 Points

DPC latencies

Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
Latency Monitor
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 17G XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
6058 μs * -916%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8
3226 μs * -441%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
1933 μs * -224%
SCHENKER Compact 17
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
596 μs *

* ... smaller is better

Storage

The laptop can accommodate two SSDs (1x NVMe, 1x NVMe/SATA; RAID 0/1) in the M.2 format. Our test device is equipped with an NVMe SSD that provides 1 TB of storage space. The transfer rates are very good. Moreover, the Schenker laptop still has room for a 2.5-inch storage medium. A mounting frame and SATA slot are available.

Two M.2 SSDs and a 2.5-inch storage drive can be installed.
Two M.2 SSDs and a 2.5-inch storage drive can be installed.
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
AS SSD
DiskSpd
hddimg
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3564 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3324 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 595 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 524 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 2488 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 3073 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 53.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 167.8 MB/s
SCHENKER Compact 17
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB		Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR		Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8		Aorus 17G XB
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ		SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB		Average Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
 		Average of class Gaming
 
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6
-14%
-24%
-27%
-12%
-19%
-7%
33%
Write 4K
167.8
123.4
-26%
121.7
-27%
141.1
-16%
123.4
-26%
117.5
-30%
155.5 ?(86.5 - 238, n=18)
-7%
207 ?(10.1 - 373, n=112, last 2 years)
23%
Read 4K
53.5
45.59
-15%
43.81
-18%
60.9
14%
45.02
-16%
46.47
-13%
51.6 ?(40.5 - 76.7, n=18)
-4%
67.8 ?(8.93 - 97.1, n=112, last 2 years)
27%
Write Seq
3073
2320
-25%
1276
-58%
1681
-45%
2526
-18%
1345
-56%
2660 ?(1197 - 3241, n=17)
-13%
3810 ?(502 - 9435, n=81, last 2 years)
24%
Read Seq
2488
2013
-19%
1183
-52%
1602
-36%
2062
-17%
2804
13%
2390 ?(1018 - 3037, n=17)
-4%
3778 ?(977 - 7931, n=81, last 2 years)
52%
Write 4K Q32T1
524
489.3
-7%
527
1%
406.6
-22%
497.9
-5%
368.2
-30%
447 ?(289 - 569, n=18)
-15%
522 ?(182.2 - 1013, n=112, last 2 years)
0%
Read 4K Q32T1
595
559
-6%
592
-1%
470.2
-21%
579
-3%
412.9
-31%
544 ?(332 - 715, n=18)
-9%
659 ?(326 - 1136, n=112, last 2 years)
11%
Write Seq Q32T1
3324
2979
-10%
2379
-28%
1759
-47%
2982
-10%
3248
-2%
3296 ?(3227 - 3339, n=18)
-1%
4836 ?(537 - 11245, n=112, last 2 years)
45%
Read Seq Q32T1
3564
3432
-4%
3213
-10%
1932
-46%
3440
-3%
3559
0%
3551 ?(3477 - 3571, n=18)
0%
6419 ?(1771 - 12915, n=112, last 2 years)
80%
AS SSD
-29%
-32%
-49%
-25%
-7%
1%
23%
Seq Read
2879
1762
-39%
1881
-35%
1778
-38%
1791
-38%
2946
2%
2800 ?(2173 - 3002, n=18)
-3%
4983 ?(2260 - 9653, n=120, last 2 years)
73%
Seq Write
2842
2309
-19%
2354
-17%
1478
-48%
2193
-23%
2627
-8%
2633 ?(2469 - 2858, n=18)
-7%
3792 ?(495 - 9486, n=120, last 2 years)
33%
4K Read
51.6
49.45
-4%
43.42
-16%
49.76
-4%
50.7
-2%
56.9
10%
51.2 ?(27.9 - 71.1, n=18)
-1%
65.4 ?(27.8 - 112.1, n=120, last 2 years)
27%
4K Write
142.5
117.1
-18%
104.1
-27%
117.9
-17%
116.8
-18%
151.7
6%
131.2 ?(86.3 - 188.1, n=18)
-8%
216 ?(79.4 - 512, n=120, last 2 years)
52%
4K-64 Read
1672
1237
-26%
1805
8%
591
-65%
1525
-9%
1222
-27%
1839 ?(1579 - 2340, n=18)
10%
1821 ?(451 - 3630, n=120, last 2 years)
9%
4K-64 Write
2293
1986
-13%
1775
-23%
875
-62%
1958
-15%
2444
7%
2144 ?(708 - 2512, n=18)
-6%
2619 ?(277 - 5909, n=120, last 2 years)
14%
Access Time Read *
0.034
0.076
-124%
0.049
-44%
0.082
-141%
0.07
-106%
0.051
-50%
0.04528 ?(0.031 - 0.068, n=18)
-33%
0.05734 ?(0.016 - 0.379, n=119, last 2 years)
-69%
Access Time Write *
0.027
0.032
-19%
0.106
-293%
0.041
-52%
0.032
-19%
0.025
7%
0.03128 ?(0.02 - 0.054, n=18)
-16%
0.04938 ?(0.011 - 1.028, n=120, last 2 years)
-83%
Score Read
2012
1463
-27%
2037
1%
818
-59%
1755
-13%
1574
-22%
2171 ?(1846 - 2708, n=18)
8%
2393 ?(776 - 4721, n=120, last 2 years)
19%
Score Write
2719
2334
-14%
2115
-22%
1140
-58%
2294
-16%
2859
5%
2539 ?(1134 - 2923, n=18)
-7%
3210 ?(515 - 7208, n=120, last 2 years)
18%
Score Total
5760
4581
-20%
5215
-9%
2377
-59%
4972
-14%
5232
-9%
5812 ?(4450 - 6452, n=18)
1%
6760 ?(2271 - 13854, n=120, last 2 years)
17%
Copy ISO MB/s
2383
1877
-21%
1495
-37%
2133 ?(1710 - 2383, n=12)
-10%
2988 ?(383 - 5643, n=98, last 2 years)
25%
Copy Program MB/s
603
539
-11%
446
-26%
698 ?(255 - 2694, n=12)
16%
945 ?(226 - 1548, n=98, last 2 years)
57%
Copy Game MB/s
873
1368
57%
697
-20%
1521 ?(791 - 5984, n=12)
74%
2032 ?(332 - 3308, n=98, last 2 years)
133%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-22% / -23%
-28% / -29%
-38% / -41%
-19% / -20%
-13% / -12%
-3% / -2%
28% / 27%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

Graphics card

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super graphics core (Turing) is a top-of-the-line GPU. It's supported by fast GDDR6 memory (8,192 MB). The 3DMark results are at a normal level for the GPU installed here. "Performance Mode" causes a very slight increase in graphics performance. Furthermore, the UHD Graphics 630 GPU that's integrated into the processor is active, and the laptop works with Nvidia's Optimus graphics-switching solution. Optimus can be disabled in the BIOS.

GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
GPU-Z
Optimus can be disabled.
Optimus can be disabled.
Fire Strike Ultra
Fire Strike Ultra
Time Spy
Time Spy
Port Royal
Port Royal
Fire Strike Ultra ("Performance Mode")
Fire Strike Ultra ("Performance Mode")
Time Spy ("Performance Mode")
Time Spy ("Performance Mode")
Port Royal ("Performance Mode")
Port Royal ("Performance Mode")
3DMark 11 Performance
24026 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
40127 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
18624 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
8338 points
Help
3DMark 11 | 3DMark
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (10741 - 73596, n=137, last 2 years)
45116 Points +58%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
29436 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (28207 - 31050, n=8)
29416 Points +3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
29011 Points +2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
28555 Points 0%
SCHENKER Compact 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
28504 Points
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
27955 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
20863 Points -27%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2913 - 56116, n=150, last 2 years)
32501 Points +51%
SCHENKER Compact 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
22775 Points +6%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
22260 Points +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (18662 - 23042, n=12)
21824 Points +1%
SCHENKER Compact 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
21541 Points
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
21532 Points 0%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
21004 Points -2%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
20914 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
16353 Points -24%
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (84648 - 193851, n=62, last 2 years)
148896 Points +96%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
134954 Points +78%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
123700 Points +63%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (75986 - 141778, n=7)
121959 Points +61%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
118058 Points +55%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
76716 Points +1%
SCHENKER Compact 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
75986 Points
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
65295 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (2295 - 25040, n=146, last 2 years)
13734 Points +66%
SCHENKER Compact 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H (Leistungsmodus)
8509 Points +3%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H
8299 Points +1%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10750H
8267 Points 0%
SCHENKER Compact 17
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, Intel Core i7-10875H
8255 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (7840 - 8657, n=12)
8238 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7468 Points -10%
Aorus 17G XB
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, Intel Core i7-10875H
7358 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-9750H
5923 Points -28%

Gaming performance

The Compact 17 brings all the latest games onto the screen smoothly at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The hardware also handles higher resolutions. However, the quality level has to be set more conservatively in some cases. "Performance Mode" leads to a slight increase in frame rates.

The Witcher 3 | Death Stranding | Serious Sam 4 | Watch Dogs Legion | Assassin´s Creed Valhalla | Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War | Yakuza Like a Dragon | Dirt 5
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 224, n=103, last 2 years)
127.5 fps +35%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
94.6 fps
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
92.7 fps -2%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
87.8 (68min) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (76.3 - 94.6, n=8)
87.3 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
75.3 (63min) fps -20%
Aorus 17G XB
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
73.6 (62min) fps -22%
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
58.5 (40min) fps -38%
Death Stranding - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (n=1last 2 years)
129.5 fps +11%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Leistungsmodus)
121.6 fps +4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (116.2 - 123.8, n=4)
119.6 fps +2%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
116.8 fps
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
116.2 fps -1%
Serious Sam 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra (DX12) AA:2xMS
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Leistungsmodus)
82.1 (16.4min, 30.7P0.1, 46.6P1 - 143max) fps +5%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
78 (4.71min, 24.4P0.1, 46.2P1 - 153max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (71.1 - 82.1, n=4)
75.9 fps -3%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
Intel Core i7-10750H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
71.1 (2.42min, 32.4P1 - 130max) fps -9%
Watch Dogs Legion - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (DX12)
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Leistungsmodus)
64 (38min, 47P0.1, 53P1 - 98max) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (59.3 - 64, n=4)
61.1 fps 0%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
61 (18min, 40P0.1, 50P1 - 99max) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (n=1last 2 years)
54.9 fps -10%
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (99 - 178, n=3, last 2 years)
126 fps
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Leistungsmodus)
93 (35min, 40P0.1, 60P1 - 149max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (60 - 93, n=3)
71.3 fps
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War - 1920x1080 Highest Settings
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
85.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (n=1)
85.1 fps 0%
Yakuza Like a Dragon - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
92.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (n=1)
92.2 fps 0%
Dirt 5 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile (Leistungsmodus)
68.6 (46.8min, 51.6P0.1, 58.2P1 - 125.1max) fps +8%
SCHENKER Compact 17
Intel Core i7-10875H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
63.8 (40.1min, 48.9P0.1, 53.5P1 - 78.2max) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
  (45.5 - 68.6, n=3)
59.3 fps -7%

In order to verify whether the frame rates remain largely constant over a prolonged period of time, we let the game The Witcher 3 run for about 60 minutes at Full HD resolution and maximum quality settings. The character is not moved. A drop in frame rates wasn't found.

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
SCHENKER Compact 17 GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB: Ø88.8 (83-96)
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø76.2 (70-80)
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR: Ø84.5 (10-91)
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, i7-10750H, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8: Ø88.9 (80-96)
Aorus 17G XB GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, i7-10875H, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ: Ø74.5 (70-80)
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB: Ø59.6 (56-63)
GPU measurements during our The Witcher 3 test
GPU measurements during our The Witcher 3 test
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
The Witcher 3 (2015) 381.2 268.1 170.2 94.6 59.8
Death Stranding (2020) 137.5 129.2 119.1 116.8 81.3 46.9
Serious Sam 4 (2020) 143 102 86.6 78 63.7 39.8
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) 112 105 92 61 44 25
Dirt 5 (2020) 165 95.5 78 63.8 52.3 34.9
Call of Duty Black Ops Cold War (2020) 191 100.5 93.8 85.1 60.6 35.3
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) 156 105.4 104.1 92.2 61 31.4

Emissions and energy - Loud under load

Noise emissions

The fans mainly work at low rotational speeds in idle usage, but they repeatedly turn up strongly for a short time - we measured sound pressure levels of up to 40 dB(A). Occasionally, they stand still. The fans produce considerably more noise under load. The maximum sound pressure level is 54.6 dB(A). Gaming is no fun here without a headset.

Noise Level

Idle
25.4 / 25.4 / 40 dB(A)
Load
54.6 / 54.6 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
  
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 25.4 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.730.93033.534.72539.742.935.84039.73135.832.830.536.135.84032.127.928.430.632.15032.628.328.728.532.66334.229.629.225.934.28033.933.925.924.233.910025.526.418.420.625.512528.329.620.118.928.316029.730.219.716.129.720031.132.322.216.631.125033.233.124.513.633.231538.238.825.213.138.240040.841.126.512.140.850037.137.423.611.437.163036.937.124.211.636.98004039.72611.740100041.341.229.811.441.3125044.744.831.81244.7160043.443.629.91243.4200045.44531.712.645.4250042.842.830.513.142.8315042.642.626.613.242.6400045.645.724.41445.6500043.543.424.514.143.5630039.23920.714.139.2800039.739.718.71539.71000037.2371615.237.21250033.733.716.11533.71600027.326.815.315.427.3SPL54.654.64025.454.6N9.79.730.79.7median 39.2median 39median 24.4median 13.6median 39.2Delta5.85.64.31.95.8hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER Compact 17

Temperature

The Compact 17 in the stress test
The Compact 17 in the stress test

In our stress test (Prime95 and FurMark run for at least an hour), the CPU and GPU run at 2.3 to 3 GHz and 1,100 to 1,600 MHz, respectively. Significantly lower speeds are achieved on battery power. The stress test represents an extreme scenario, though. We use this test to check whether the system remains stable under full load.

The laptop doesn't get particularly warm. During the stress test, we register temperatures in the lower to mid 40-°C range (~104 °F) at some measuring points. The values are within the green area in everyday use.

Max. Load
 38 °C
100 F		40.1 °C
104 F		40.5 °C
105 F		 
 32.1 °C
90 F		36.1 °C
97 F		38.9 °C
102 F		 
 26.6 °C
80 F		26.2 °C
79 F		28.4 °C
83 F		 
Maximum: 40.5 °C = 105 F
Average: 34.1 °C = 93 F
44.9 °C
113 F		43.8 °C
111 F		39 °C
102 F
38.9 °C
102 F		41.6 °C
107 F		29.6 °C
85 F
26.4 °C
80 F		31.2 °C
88 F		26.5 °C
80 F
Maximum: 44.9 °C = 113 F
Average: 35.8 °C = 96 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.5 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 22.9 °C = 73 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.5 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.3 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
Heat development top (load)
Heat development top (load)
Heat development top (idle)
Heat development top (idle)
Heat development bottom (load)
Heat development bottom (load)
Heat development bottom (idle)
Heat development bottom (idle)

Speakers

The Compact 17 is equipped with a 2.1 speaker system that produces a very decent sound. However, it lacks bass - despite having a subwoofer.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203333.533253840383136.236.136.24029.930.629.95034.828.534.86335.725.935.78048.324.248.310043.120.643.112550.318.950.316050.316.150.320049.916.649.92505713.65731563.713.163.740073.812.173.850073.911.473.963074.211.674.280077.311.777.3100080.911.480.9125078.31278.31600751275200076.212.676.2250072.513.172.5315067.413.267.4400066.81466.8500070.614.170.6630069.714.169.7800065.11565.1100006715.267125006715671600068.315.468.3SPL86.525.486.5N67.60.767.6median 68.3median 13.6median 68.3Delta5.81.95.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER Compact 17
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER Compact 17 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 25% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy consumption

Energy consumption is at a normal level for the hardware installed here. The power adapter's output is 230 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.4 / 1.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 13.6 / 19.8 / 23.5 Watt
Load midlight 105 / 243 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy

Battery life

The 17.3-incher completed our WLAN test (accessing websites using a script; display brightness at about 150 cd/m²) after 4:40 hours. The value is perfectly acceptable for a powerful laptop with a 4K display.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 86)
4h 40min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Aorus 17G XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
450 min +61%
Average of class Gaming
  (85 - 889, n=120, last 2 years)
388 min +39%
Gigabyte Aero 17 HDR XB
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, 94 Wh
372 min +33%
Asus Strix G17 G712LWS
i7-10750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 66 Wh
330 min +18%
SCHENKER Compact 17
i7-10875H, GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, 62 Wh
280 min
SCHENKER XMG Pro 17 PB71RD-G
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 62 Wh
244 min -13%
Razer Blade Pro 17 4K UHD 120 Hz
i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 70 Wh
223 min -20%

Pros

+ individually customizable
+ matte IPS display (4K)
+ 100% sRGB coverage
+ high system performance
+ NVMe SSD
+ space for a second SSD
+ space for a 2.5-inch storage drive
+ RAID 0/1 capable
+ RGB lighting
+ very fast memory card reader
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ the three DisplayPorts support G-Sync

Cons

- low display contrast
- poorly chamfered lid corners (metal)
- inconsistent fan control
- loud under load

Verdict

The Schenker Compact 17, provided by Schenker.
The Schenker Compact 17, provided by Schenker.

The Compact 17 doesn't follow the trend towards increasingly thinner cases - which leads to good heat dissipation. Our measurements confirm this: Under load, the device warms up moderately at best. The fan control needs attention: The fans sometimes turn up too much in idle usage. The problem can't be solved by using a different performance scheme.

The well-equipped Schenker Compact 17 offers many upgrade options.

There are no problems in terms of performance. The Core i7-10875H processor and the GeForce RTX 2070 Super graphics core bring all modern computer games smoothly onto the screen. 32 GB of memory (dual-channel mode; max. 64 GB) and a 1 TB NVMe SSD represent an adequate storage configuration. Expanding storage wouldn't be a problem if necessary.

The display (4K, IPS, 60 Hz) scores points with a matte surface, stable viewing angles, high brightness, decent color reproduction, and good color-space coverage. Contrast should be higher, though. Battery life is alright. The chiclet keyboard (RGB lighting) proved to be suitable for everyday use. Moreover, the laptop's ample range of connections includes, among other things, four video outputs - three of which support G-Sync. Finally, the build quality deserves criticism: The lid's tapered corners (metal) are poorly chamfered.

SCHENKER Compact 17 - 12/08/2020 v7 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
68 / 98 → 69%
Keyboard
83%
Pointing Device
78%
Connectivity
70 / 80 → 87%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Battery
62 / 95 → 65%
Display
88%
Games Performance
95%
Application Performance
89%
Temperature
91 / 95 → 96%
Noise
62 / 90 → 69%
Audio
77%
Camera
39 / 85 → 46%
Average
74%
84%
Gaming - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

SCHENKER Compact 17 (Compact 17 Series)
News
•
"Marvel's Avengers" or "Troy -...

Price comparison

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Schenker Compact 17 (Clevo PB71DF2-G) in review: A lot of performance with little heat development
Sascha Mölck, 2020-12-11 (Update: 2020-12-11)