Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi 15

Xiaomi 15 smartphone review - Xiaomi's flagship phone sets new benchmarks for performance and battery life

Recipe for success.

The Snapdragon 8 Elite makes the Xiaomi 15 one of the fastest Android phones currently on the market. Plus, the 6.36-inch Xiaomi flagship has a lot more to offer, such as record runtimes and an even brighter display that can reach peaks of 3500 nits. Our test will reveal how much the competition has to live up to.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇪🇸 ...
Android 5G Touchscreen Smartphone

Verdict on the Xiaomi 15 - Even faster with better endurance

Xiaomi has further improved its flagship smartphone. With one exception, the Xiaomi 15 has inherited the powerful connectivity of its predecessors and is now better equipped to face the competition from Apple. The message is clear: If you're on the hunt for a compact smartphone, then the 6.36-inch Xiaomi 15 is a good alternative to the Apple iPhone 16 or iPhone 16 Pro. The Xiaomi flagship offers plenty of arguments in its favor, three of which stand out in particular.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

Its 120 Hz LTPO OLED display is now even brighter, with its HDR brightness surpassing the 2,500-nit mark. Plus, the Snapdragon 8 Elite makes the Xiaomi 15 one of the fastest Android smartphones currently on the market—results such as its AnTuTu score of 2,677,100 points underline this clearly. Moreover, a 17% larger battery helps give the Xiaomi 15 astounding runtimes that almost no other phone manages to come close to.

The list of negatives is relatively short if you disregard the limitations of our Chinese test version, as these shouldn't be an issue with the global version. Then, there are really only two disadvantages: The Snapdragon 8 Elite has a tendency to overheat under load, and the smaller tele-zoom (which has shrunk from the Xiaomi 14's 3.2x down to 2.6x) removes a bit of flexibility from its Leica camera system.

Pros

+ super bright 120-Hz display
+ very high performance
+ USB-C 3.2
+ good triple camera with 3x 50 MP
+ excellent battery life
+ fast charging at up to 90 watts
+ IP68 certification

Cons

- high waste heat
- telephoto lens only has 2.6x zoom
- no eSIM support (only China version)
- only 12-month warranty (only China version)

Price and availability

The Xiaomi 15 currently isn't available to purchase in the United States. However, you can order it as an import device from our lender TradingShenzhen for around $800.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.4%
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $209.98
Xiaomi Watch S4 Smartwatch w...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Screen...
3. $19.98
120W Fast Wall Charger Block...
List Price: 760€
191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED
2.
88.2%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18 ⎘
Apple A18 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $999.96
iPhone 16 / 128GB / Black (S...
2. $1,439.96
iPhone 16 Pro Max / 256GB / ...
3. $35.00
Apple iPhone 16 Silicone Cas...
List Price: 1329€
170 gApple 512GB NVMe6.10"
2556x1179
460 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
3.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $975.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
2. $799.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
3. $9.99
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P...
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
4.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 899€
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
89% v7 (old)
Sony Xperia 5 V
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $707.54
List Price: 999€
182 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"
2520x1080
449 PPI
OLED
6.
89.8% v7 (old)
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $789.99
List Price: 700€
193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED

Xiaomi is relaunching its flagship smartphone. The Xiaomi 15 has been available in China since the end of October, but should find its way to us by early 2025 at the latest. However, we didn't want to wait that long and have already taken a closer look at the Chinese version, which should only differ from the global version in a few ways.

Xiaomi hasn't changed anything about the predecessor model's size of 6.36 inches. This makes the Xiaomi 15 one of the most compact high-end smartphones currently available. As our test showed, despite its comparatively small dimensions, the Android 15 phone is very far ahead of the competition in terms of its performance and battery life, outperforming the Xiaomi 14 in both respects.

Specifications: The Xiaomi 15

Xiaomi 15 (15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.36 inch 20:9, 2670 x 1200 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, touch sampling rate up to 300 Hz, max. brightness 3200 nits; HDR: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 491 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Rear ambient light sensor, Acceleration sensor, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, X-axis linear motor, Infrared remote control, flicker sensor, laser focus sensor, barometer, Hall sensor, 4x4 MIMO, Camera2 API Level 3, Dolby Atmos, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/34/38/39/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78/80/81/83/84/89); Head SAR & Body SAR < 2 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.08 x 152.3 x 71.2 ( = 0.32 x 6 x 2.8 in)
Battery
5400 mAh Lithium-Ion, 90W charging; 50W wireless charging, 10W wireless reverse charging; supports QC3+, QC3.0, QC2.0, PD3.0, PD2.0; Silicon-Carbon-Anode
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Hunter 900, OIS, f/1.62, 23mm, 2.4μm pixel size) + 50 MP telephoto (2.6x optical zoom, OIS, f/2.0, 60mm) + 50 MP ultrawide (115°, EIS, f/2.2, 14mm); video recording up to 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 22mm; video recording up to 4K@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 90W charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, Quick start guide, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
191 g ( = 6.74 oz / 0.42 pounds), Power Supply: 97 g ( = 3.42 oz / 0.21 pounds)
Price
760 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - From glass to crocodile leather, everything is covered

The Xiaomi 15 is slightly slimmer, thinner and more lightweight than the Xiaomi 14. Visually, it could almost be an alternative to the iPhone thanks to its flatter and more angular design. The glass version uses a matte back cover that barely attracts fingerprint marks. 

Its bezels have also been reduced in size, now measuring in at only 1.4 millimeters in width, resulting in an improved display-to-surface ratio of 94 percent. The same as with the Xiaomi 14, a striking camera unit on the back protrudes a few millimeters from the phone's body. However, the LED flash is no longer part of the lens ensemble, instead sitting to the right of it.

The case's materials once again consist of glass and aluminum. The Xiaomi 15 makes use of so-called Dragon Crystal Glass which, according to the manufacturer, is said to be ten times more robust than the Xiaomi 14's Gorilla Glas Victus. All-in-all, its build quality is great and all gaps are tight and even. The Xiaomi 15 wasn't fazed by our twisting attempts, and it is IP68 protected against dust and water.

The Xiaomi smartphone comes in a glass version which, like our test device, has a mint-green back cover, as well as in the colorways light blue, white and black. Buyers in China can additionally access a colorway called Bright Silver, whose back cover features a wave pattern. In addition, there is a visually striking Diamond Limited Edition version of the phone with crystals inside its aluminum frame and a crocodile leather-look back cover. In these versions, the case's thickness increases from 8.1 to 8.5 and 8.4 millimeters respectively.

Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15 with a mint-green back cover
Xiaomi 15 with a light-blue cover
Xiaomi 15 with a black back cover
Xiaomi 15 with a white back cover

Size comparison

154 mm / 6.06 in 68 mm / 2.68 in 8.6 mm / 0.3386 in 182 g0.4012 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 72 mm / 2.83 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 199 g0.4387 lbs152.8 mm / 6.02 in 71.5 mm / 2.81 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 193 g0.4255 lbs152.3 mm / 6 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.08 mm / 0.3181 in 191 g0.4211 lbs147.6 mm / 5.81 in 71.6 mm / 2.82 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 170 g0.3748 lbs147 mm / 5.79 in 70.6 mm / 2.78 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 167 g0.3682 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - The Xiaomi 15 with up to 16 GB RAM and 1 TB storage

The Xiaomi 15 has retained the powerful connectivity of its predecessor—with a few extras, although these are only minor details. Instead of an optical fingerprint sensor, it now has an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor under its display and the screen's touch sampling rate has been increased from 240 to 300 Hz.

In addition to an IR blaster, its features include dual SIM, WiFi 7, NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, stereo speakers and dual-band GPS. However, it still doesn't have a UWB chip, as used in iPhones, for example. The USB-C port with its USB 3.2 connection ensures fast data transfers. It achieved speeds of 346 MByte/s during the copying test using the M2.SSD Samsung 980 Pro (USB 3.2 Gen. 2).

On the Chinese market, Xiaomi offers its flagship phone in four storage variants: 12/256 GB, 12/512 GB, 16/512 GB and 16/1024 GB. It is not yet known whether all of these will also be available with the global version.

Left: no connections
Left: no connections
Right: power button, volume rocker
Right: power button, volume rocker
Top: no connections
Top: no connections
Bottom: dual-SIM, microphone, USB-C 3.2 Gen 1, speaker
Bottom: dual-SIM, microphone, USB-C 3.2 Gen 1, speaker

Software - HyperOS 2.0 based on Android 15

The Xiaomi 15 runs HyperOS 2.0 based on Android 15. Xiaomi's user interface can be operated practically the same as HyperOS 1.0 on the Xiaomi 14, which in turn is very similar to standard Android. Under the hood, however, a lot has changed.

In addition to various system optimizations, these changes naturally also concern the trending topic of AI. For example, HyperOS can be used to generate texts, scan ID cards and find photos based on a description. New personalization options are also included, such as new designs and widgets for the start and home screens as well as animated wallpapers. In the global version, however, the AI features are likely to look even different thanks to Xiaomi's cooperation with Google.

HyperOS 2.0 has been rolled out for Xiaomi's smartphones, tablets and smartwatches since November. Xiaomi's founder, Lei Jun, has published the schedule for this on his X account.

In the Chinese version, HyperOS 2.0 only understands English as a system language in addition to simplified Chinese, traditional Chinese, Tibetan and Uyghur. The Google Store is not installed, but can be retrofitted immediately via Xiaomi's GetApps app store because the Google framework is already running in the background. The Xiaomi 15 also supports DRM Widevine L1.

Xiaomi hasn't provided any information on our Chinese test version's update period. However, as with its predecessor, it should be supplied with 4 years of OS upgrades and 5 years of Android security patches. At the time of testing in early December, its Android security patches were up to date as of November 1. 

Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15

Sustainability

Xiaomi hasn't provided any precise information about the proportion of recycled materials used in its smartphones. However, according to the manufacturer, the amount of recycled aluminum, gold and copper has been increased for smartphone components. The company also aims to keep its own ecological footprint as small as possible through measures such as the production of plastic material from discarded fishing nets and trade-in programs.

Xiaomi aims to recycle a total of 38,000 tons of electronic waste by 2026. So far, 44 percent of this target has been reached. The company also follows the provisions of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas and the RBA Responsible Minerals Initiative (RMI), which regulate the procurement of conflict materials such as tin, tungsten, tantalum, gold and cobalt.

Communication and GNSS - The Xiaomi phone with WiFi 7 and dual-SIM

The Xiaomi 15 supports the fastest Wi-Fi standard currently available, namely WiFi 7. Connected to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, it achieved a high data throughput using the 6 GHz band, peaking at just under 1,800 Mbps. However, during our test, its transfer rates in the receiving direction weren't particularly high at first, as they started at a low 628 MBit/s.

In our import version, its cellular bands are optimized for the Chinese market. Surprisingly, its frequency support also includes LTE band 20, which hardly plays a role in Asia, but is all the more important in Europe—especially when it comes to good cellular reception in rural areas.

The global version of the Xiaomi 15 is likely to support significantly more cellular bands than the Chinese version, so no restrictions are to be expected in this respect.

Networking
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 16
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
776 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1401 (min: 1319) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1257 (min: 1214) MBit/s ∼70%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼48%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi 14
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼97%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1015 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1014 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼62%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1527 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1515 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼84%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
737 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1392 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1407 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼78%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (628-1900)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1671-1841)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (445-968)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (785-951)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
GPS test indoors
GPS test indoors
GPS test outside
GPS test outside

The Xiaomi phone uses all important satellite navigation services to determine its current position, such as GPS, Glonass, Galileo, Beidou and QZSS. This is usually done in dual-band mode and this was reflected in our test with a location accuracy of 3 meters. It didn't matter whether we were outdoors or indoors.

The device is very suitable for navigation tasks. It recorded the route of our 10-kilometer bike ride almost as accurately as the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, which served as our reference device.

GPS test: summary
GPS test: summary
GPS test: trip around a lake
GPS test: trip around a lake
GPS test: turning point
GPS test: turning point

Telephone features and call quality - The Xiaomi 15 import version without eSIM support

The Xiaomi 15 comes with a dual SIM slot and supports VoLTE as well as Wi-Fi calls. eSIMs cannot be activated on our test device. However, this functionality should be included in the global version.

In our test, the Xiaomi phone boasted good call quality and transmitted voices clearly and distinctly. In hands-free mode, background noise seemed to be filtered out quite effectively, even in noisy environments.

Cameras - A Leica triple-camera with a 50-MP resolution

Photo taken using selfie camera
Photo taken using selfie camera

The Xiaomi 15's selfie camera has a resolution of 32 MP and records videos at up to 4K and at 60 frames per second. It takes good pictures and can use the full 32 MP without pixel binning

Xiaomi has also stuck to its cooperation with Leica when it comes to its new flagship phone. The camera app therefore again features the two Leica image modes called Leica Vibrant (more saturated colors) and Leica Authentic (realistic colors). The lens composition has also remained the same. The main telephoto and ultra-wide-angle cameras each feature 50 MP.

The same as with the Xiaomi 14, its main camera uses the 1/1.31-inch Light Hunter 900, an OIS-stabilized sensor that shoots 12.5 MP photos using 4-in-1 pixel binning. In good lighting conditions, the images boast high sharpness, natural colors and vivid contrasts.

The phone's ultra-wide-angle camera also uses 4-in-1 pixel binning and has a similar color balance to the main camera. However, it can't come close to its level of detail and struggles with blurring at the edges of the image.

The OIS-stabilized telephoto lens has even taken a small step backward compared to the Xiaomi 14. Instead of a 3.2x optical zoom and a focal length of 75mm, it now only features a 2.6x zoom and a focal length reduced to 60mm. Nevertheless, its picture quality is solid and the telephoto lens can capture lots of detail up to a magnification of around 5x.

Its main camera records good-quality videos at up to 8K at 24 FPS. The ultra-wide-angle and telephoto lenses can record up to 4K at 60 frames per second. You can switch back and forth between all three lenses while recording.

Photo taken using main camera (no zoom)
Photo taken using main camera (no zoom)
Photo taken using main camera (2x zoom)
Photo taken using main camera (2x zoom)
Photo taken using telephoto camera (2.6x zoom)
Photo taken using telephoto camera (2.6x zoom)
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

In controlled lighting conditions, the main camera proved that it could capture colors relatively accurately, but suffered a few inaccuracies when it came to dark brown and green tones. The main camera only depicted the test chart blurrily at 1 lux of residual light, but it was complete and clearly recognizable.

ColorChecker
18.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
14 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15: 10.48 ∆E min: 3.4 - max: 22.75 ∆E
ColorChecker
24 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
46 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15: 32.48 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 48.52 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - 90-watt power supply included

The included 90-watt power supply.
The included 90-watt power supply.

The Chinese version of the Xiaomi 15 comes with a 90-watt power adapter (up to 20V/4.5A, plug type A), a USB-C cable, a SIM tool, a protective cover and a quick start guide. The power adapter will likely be omitted when it comes to the global version. Anyone who buys the smartphone from our loaner TradingShenzhen will receive a power adapter as a free gift.

TradingShenzhen offers a 12-month warranty on the Xiaomi 15. The global version is likely to come with a 24-month warranty, as is usual for Xiaomi.

Input devices & operation - The Xiaomi 15 with an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor

Powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the Xiaomi 15's operation is very smooth and the device provides precise haptic feedback thanks to its precisely adjustable vibration motor. The system's speed stays consistently high even with lots of apps open at the same time. The phone can only be brought to its limits through test apps such as the Burnout benchmark, which puts the CPU and GPU under maximum load. The 120 Hz OLED screen works using a touch sampling rate of 300 Hz and implements inputs very accurately.

While the Xiaomi 14 was still equipped with an optical fingerprint sensor, the Xiaomi 15 uses an ultrasonic fingerprint sensor. As usual, it is located under the display, reacts even when the screen is off and boasts an excellent recognition rate. Alternatively, biometric authentication is also possible via 2D facial recognition, which works just as reliably in sufficient ambient light.

The retrofitted Google Gboard in landscape mode ...
The retrofitted Google Gboard in landscape mode ...
... and in portrait mode.
... and in portrait mode.

Display - up to 3,500 nits in HDR mode

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The Xiaomi 15's 120 Hz display is very similar to that of its predecessor. The 6.36-inch LPTO OLED's resolution remains unchanged at 2,670 x 1,200 pixels and its pixel density is still 460 PPI. According to the spec sheet, however, its brightness is now higher. Instead of "only" 3,000 nits, the OLED panel should now shine at up to 3,200 nits.

When displaying an all-white background, we measured an average brightness of 1,018 cd/m², which doesn't sound very spectacular at first. When showing smaller image sections (APL18), however, the OLED panel increased to a brightness of up to 3,463 cd/m², in turn delivering on its promise. With a peak value of 3,593 cd/m², the display gets even brighter in HDR mode, ensuring first-class HDR effects.

If you deactivate the brightness sensor, the brightness remains in three digits. You can expect a maximum of 611 cd/m² using the default setting, and up to 814 cd/m² with Sunlight Mode activated.

The OLED panel uses pulse width modulation (PWM) to control its brightness. This means that it flickers at a low frequency of 120 Hz across all the brightness levels we measured, which may be problematic for sensitive users. However, the display also works using high-frequency PWM dimming to compensate for the negative effects of PWM flickering. We measured a PWM dimming frequency of 3,846 Hz. How high it should nominally be is not stated in the phone's datasheet.

1008
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²
1021
cd/m²
1021
cd/m²
1020
cd/m²
1020
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1025 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1017.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1021 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.3 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
CCT: 6658 K
Xiaomi 15
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Apple iPhone 16
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Sony Xperia 5 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Screen
23%
53%
-28%
-6%
6%
Brightness middle
1021
1101
8%
2083
104%
1349
32%
889
-13%
1043
2%
Brightness
1018
1102
8%
2016
98%
1369
34%
898
-12%
1052
3%
Brightness Distribution
98
99
1%
84
-14%
97
-1%
97
-1%
96
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
0.7
46%
3.3
-154%
1.4
-8%
1.1
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
1.5
48%
2
31%
5
-72%
4.5
-55%
2.8
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.3
41%
1.1
50%
2.4
-9%
1
55%
1.9
14%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.16 102%
2.22 99%
1.97 112%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6658 98%
6480 100%
6560 99%
6635 98%
6456 101%
6740 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 17.54 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).

Our analysis using a photo spectrometer and the Calman software revealed that the Xiaomi 15's OLED panel only suffers very low average Delta-E deviations. Its color depiction is most accurate using the Original Color PRO color profile and a color temperature set to warm.

Vivid and saturated are two further profiles users can choose from. You can additionally adjust the color space and color temperature and activate the Adaptive Colors mode, which adjusts the display colors to the ambient light.

Color accuracy (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color profile Original Color Pro, color temperature warm, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5325 ms rise
↘ 0.4815 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.492 ms rise
↘ 0.3725 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

The Xiaomi 15 does well outdoors. It easily copes with winter light conditions, but should also have no problems displaying content legibly in summer thanks to its high brightness reserves. The OLED panel's viewing-angle stability is great.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance - The Xiaomi 15 with the Snapdragon 8 Elite

The Xiaomi 15 is the first flagship smartphone to use Qualcomm's new high-end Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC. The octa-core processor, manufactured with a 3 nm structure width, calculates using 2 prime cores at up to 4.32 GHz, which can be temporarily overclocked, as well as 6 performance cores at up to 3.53 GHz. The Snapdragon 8 Elite is flanked by the Adreno 830 GPU and can access up to 16 GB LPDDR5X RAM inside the Xiaomi 15.

The Snapdragon 8 Elite helps the Xiaomi 15 to deliver outstanding performance. During the synthetic benchmarks, the SoC provided new Android best values, thus replacing the previous performance leader, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Resistance arose in the Apple camp in the shape of the Apple A18. Although the Apple SoC fell far behind during AnTuTu v10, it beat the Snapdragon 8 Elite in Geekbench 6 with a higher single-core performance and took first place in AImark v3 by a large margin.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
3377 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=22)
3034 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
2006 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1618 Points -46%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7784 - 10401, n=22)
9225 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
8362 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5198 Points -44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4668 Points -49%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2099 - 2286, n=11)
2206 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2173 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1684 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1497 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2437, n=148, last 2 years)
1147 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
7733 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (6384 - 8816, n=11)
7614 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6307 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4998 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=148, last 2 years)
3893 Points -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points -51%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2340778 - 3015111, n=16)
2707247 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1632305 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=144, last 2 years)
1342470 Points -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14378 - 27169, n=19)
20518 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15925 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=191, last 2 years)
14331 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -38%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1064 - 2674, n=16)
1838 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1718 Points
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1492 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1170 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=145, last 2 years)
1047 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points -41%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8155 - 14066, n=16)
11055 Points 0%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10370 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8863 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=151, last 2 years)
7076 Points -36%
System
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15741 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 20776, n=16)
15455 Points -6%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14618 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=151, last 2 years)
10868 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -51%
Memory
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7081 - 20572, n=16)
13035 Points -23%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11252 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
9266 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20652, n=151, last 2 years)
7957 Points -53%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35063 - 384996, n=16)
62851 Points +42%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
31876 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
26141 Points -41%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 384996, n=151, last 2 years)
22958 Points -48%
Web
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2048 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +59%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=16)
1883 Points +57%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points +56%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1743 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=151, last 2 years)
1637 Points +36%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +101%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=142, last 2 years)
18925 Points +4%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=14)
17502 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
16413 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -36%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
33181 Points +1754%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=127, last 2 years)
26867 Points +1401%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (787 - 307528, n=14)
23511 Points +1213%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1160 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -37%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 2472, n=55, last 2 years)
508 Points +2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (255 - 738, n=15)
503 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
500 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
315 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
283 Points -43%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=55, last 2 years)
1148 Points +134%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
491 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (218 - 734, n=15)
490 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points -34%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
301 Points -39%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=55, last 2 years)
1868 Points +73%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (555 - 1708, n=15)
1121 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1080 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
669 Points -38%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3194 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)
949 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=4)
234 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
182 Points
Score V6
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 12784, n=13)
8302 Points +738%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5332 Points +438%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=56, last 2 years)
4240 Points +328%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
991 Points

The Xiaomi 15's graphics performance is similarly impressive. The Snapdragon 8 Elite's Adreno 830 GPU made the smartphone a serial winner during the graphics benchmarks. Neither the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 nor the Apple A18 could compete here. Even so, the Qualcomm SoC suffered a small outlier: It achieved a moderate Physics score in 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited, which is why the Xiaomi 15 only landed in the midfield during this test.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4142 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3627 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4255 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3667 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
16523 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13993 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points -49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -62%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7453 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11649 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7422 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1569 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -55%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1803 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7939 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7231 Points +32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6268 Points +15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5602 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5466 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33210 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32235 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25121 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23181 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16300 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19187 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16451 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15607 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14492 Points -7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11444 Points -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
477 fps -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
476 fps -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
297 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -31%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
201 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
139 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -9%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
59.9 fps -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -31%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -39%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
52.3 fps -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
165 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
140 fps -49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
25.5 fps -46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -57%

Web surfing on the Xiaomi 15 appears to be just like the rest of its operation: everything runs extremely smoothly and feels completely effortless. However, the browser benchmarks didn't entirely reflect this, as the smartphone only landed in the upper midfield.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
280.143 Points +46%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 289, n=14)
211 Points +10%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179.212 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=154, last 2 years)
142.4 Points -26%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
539 runs/min +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (244 - 419, n=6)
362 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
342 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min -22%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
264 runs/min -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
207 runs/min -39%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=137, last 2 years)
181.3 runs/min -47%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179 runs/min -48%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
32.4 runs/min +38%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 34, n=13)
23.5 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -33%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=105, last 2 years)
12.7 runs/min -46%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 122)
11.6 runs/min -51%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
263 Points +57%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (125 - 255, n=14)
179.4 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
171 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=149, last 2 years)
133.6 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
96054 Points +22%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=19)
71058 Points -10%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
61881 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
44659 Points -43%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=158, last 2 years)
1287 ms * -183%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
705.9 ms * -55%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -54%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * -46%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 873, n=15)
532 ms * -17%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms *
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
284.5 ms * +37%

* ... smaller is better

The Xiaomi 15's UFS 4.0 storage ensures a very high data throughput. Delivering a sequential read performance of almost 4,000 MByte/s, apps are always loaded within a very short time.

Xiaomi 15Google Pixel 9 ProSamsung Galaxy S24Sony Xperia 5 VXiaomi 14Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-51%
-24%
-17%
17%
7%
-27%
Sequential Read 256KB
3934.92
1717.9
-56%
3701.23
-6%
1812.23
-54%
3385.74
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
3889.06
253.53
-93%
1435.39
-63%
1331.81
-66%
2906.65
-25%
3068 ?(1494 - 4030, n=47)
-21%
Random Read 4KB
296.95
218.41
-26%
373.12
26%
359.71
21%
420.99
42%
Random Write 4KB
360.36
261.55
-27%
175.98
-51%
473.91
32%
594.78
65%

Games - Graphics power in abundance

Displaying the latest games smoothly is child's play for the Xiaomi 15. Our test games Genshin Impact and PUBG Mobile were run at maximum frame rates in all detail levels. Theoretically, they could be even higher, but both games have an internal FPS limit. Genshin Impact ran at 60 frames per second throughout, while PUBG Mobile ran at between 40 and 90 frames per second depending on the graphics setting. PUBG Mobile now also allows up to 120 FPS in the lowest graphics settings, but it didn't seem to offer this option for the Xiaomi 15.

We measured the game frame rates using Gamebench.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 15; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø60.2 (57-61)
Xiaomi 15; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø60.1 (57-61)
Xiaomi 15; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.5.0: Ø89.7 (85-90)
Xiaomi 15; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.5.0: Ø59.9 (54-61)
Xiaomi 15; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.5.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)

Emissions - The Snapdragon 8 Elite overheats

Temperature

The Xiaomi 15 heats up quickly under load. We measured a temperature hotspot of 47 °C next to the camera module on the back cover. Although this value is harmless in thermal terms, it no longer feels very comfortable to hold the smartphone in your hand during longer gaming sessions. The Xiaomi 15 was brought to its knees reproducibly using the Burnout benchmark, as it overheated after a short time with the stress test app.

The Xiaomi smartphone also quickly throttles its performance under load. In the 3DMark stress tests, which render the same game scene 20 times in a row, its scores dropped after the first run and only leveled off at around 2/3 of the initial values at the end. Despite the thermally triggered SoC handbrake, the Xiaomi 15 continued to run as fast as an arrow—we didn't notice any limitations in apps or games during the test.

Max. Load
 44.1 °C
111 F
44.8 °C
113 F
43.9 °C
111 F
 
 45.4 °C
114 F
46.6 °C
116 F
43.6 °C
110 F
 
 45 °C
113 F
45.8 °C
114 F
41.8 °C
107 F
 
Maximum: 46.6 °C = 116 F
Average: 44.6 °C = 112 F
40.7 °C
105 F
44.3 °C
112 F
43.2 °C
110 F
40 °C
104 F
45.3 °C
114 F
47 °C
117 F
39.4 °C
103 F
42.7 °C
109 F
47 °C
117 F
Maximum: 47 °C = 117 F
Average: 43.3 °C = 110 F
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 20.4 °C = 69 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
93.3 % +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +14%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % +2%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 %
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +1%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
68.7 % 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -17%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -25%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
72.5 % +8%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 % +6%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -13%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % +11%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
72.4 % +4%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.8 (24.8-37.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6)
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15

Speakers

The Dolby Atmos-compatible stereo speakers produce a fairly loud sound with very balanced mids and highs. However, we noted hardly any bass in their sound.

The sound is much better when you connect external speakers or headphones via USB-C or Bluetooth 5.4. Our import version supports some—but by no means all—common BT audio codecs, including SBC, AAC, LDAC as well as aptX, aptX HD and aptX Adaptive.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.440.72533.836.13117.834.64021.234.75030.437.96324.338.68015.342.410016.840.212514.145.816013.454.420013.154.525013.55831513.461.340011.762.450011.367.163010.371.880010.476.9100012.778125011.679.9160012.780.4200013.879.5250014.381.3315013.779400012.681500013.480.9630013.379.8800013.381.71000013.571.61250013.667.8160001461.5SPL25.191.3N0.690.6median 13.4median 76.9Delta0.79.536.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 15Samsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Runs and runs and runs

Power consumption

Despite almost identical body dimensions, the Xiaomi 15 has a much larger battery than the Xiaomi 14, which has grown by 790 mAh to 5,400 mAh compared to the previous 4,610 mAh. This is made possible by a silicon-carbon anode, which allows smaller batteries to have a higher energy density.

The phone boasts a super low maximum power consumption of 9.3 watts under load, which we simulated with the demanding Burnout benchmark. When the Xiaomi 15 is put under a lot of strain, it sometimes runs twice as frugally as the competition.

The Xiaomi 15 gets its energy supply from its 90-watt power supply unit. During our test, it only took 45 minutes to restore its battery from 1 percent to 100 percent. The battery hit the 80-percent mark after just 30 minutes.

Xiaomi has answered the question of whether fast charging harms the phone's battery in the long term as follows: After 1,600 charging cycles, the battery should still have more than 80 percent of its original capacity. If the smartphone is only fully charged every 2 days, which should be a realistic time span due to the device's long battery life, the 80 percent mark will only be reached after over 8 years.

The Xiaomi 15 supports wireless charging at 50 watts and reverse wireless charging at 10 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.5 / 1.11 / 1.13 Watt
Load midlight 8.91 / 9.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-4%
-24%
-23%
-7%
7%
-58%
-28%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
0.51
-2%
0.59
-18%
0.42
16%
0.79
-58%
0.51
-2%
1.137 ?(0.49 - 3.8, n=20)
-127%
Idle Average *
1.11
1.42
-28%
1.1
1%
0.93
16%
1.08
3%
0.89
20%
1.711 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=20)
-54%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.43
-27%
1.2
-6%
1.07
5%
1.12
1%
0.92
19%
1.925 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=20)
-70%
Load Average *
8.91
4.21
53%
7.15
20%
15.43
-73%
7.93
11%
9.08
-2%
9.04 ?(5.8 - 13, n=16)
-1%
Load Maximum *
9.3
10.96
-18%
20.37
-119%
16.51
-78%
8.78
6%
9.11
2%
12.9 ?(8.86 - 19.5, n=16)
-39%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5 (0.695-9.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.8 (0.822-12.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.693 (0.662-0.794)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.27 (9.11-9.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.37-11.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.693 (0.662-0.794)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Runtimes

Its battery, which is around 17 percent larger than that of the Xiaomi 14, helps the Xiaomi 15 manage outstanding runtimes that hardly any other compact flagship smartphone can currently match. The Xiaomi 15 lasted almost 23 hours of simulated web surfing and almost 30 hours of continuous video playback during our test.

We could only run the Burnout benchmark to determine its minimum runtime with the handbrake on. In our test, we only activated the CPU load because the CPU and GPU load combined caused the smartphone to overheat after about 15 minutes.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
62h 39min
WiFi Websurfing
22h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
29h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 26min
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Battery Runtime
-25%
-26%
-39%
-15%
-16%
Reader / Idle
3759
2772
-26%
2398
-36%
2788
-26%
2926
-22%
H.264
1784
1385
-22%
1227
-31%
1493
-16%
1674
-6%
WiFi v1.3
1367
1096
-20%
1017
-26%
880
-36%
952
-30%
1092
-20%
Load
326
217
-33%
159
-51%
371
14%
277
-15%

Notebookcheck total rating

The compact Xiaomi 15 scores points with its very bright OLED display, brute performance and excellent battery life.

Xiaomi 15 - 12/11/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 96%
Weight
89%
Battery
93%
Display
91%
Games Performance
45 / 55 → 81%
Application Performance
79 / 85 → 93%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
79%
Average
72%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
96.4%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
77.8%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 3 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi 15 smartphone review - Xiaomi's flagship phone sets new benchmarks for performance and battery life
Manuel Masiero, 2024-12-14 (Update: 2024-12-14)