Notebookcheck Logo
(Bildquelle: Alexander Wätzel)

The smartphone with a Porsche design and improved technology - Honor Magic7 RSR review

LiDAR without the iPhone.

The latest version of the Magic7 Pro features an exterior that was once again developed by Porsche Design. However, the Honor Magic7 RSR offers even more than just a modified form; it also sets additional technical accents.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Anton Avdyushkin (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

Verdict - Design upgrade with added value

The Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR is technically very similar to the Magic7 Pro and presents itself as a very good high-end smartphone. In addition to the Porsche-inspired design, however, it offers twice the memory, an extended scope of delivery, improved LiDAR autofocus, and a faster telephoto lens.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

The larger battery reads like a plus point, but the RSR cannot achieve longer runtimes in the test. Honor has also not improved the cooling of the fast Snapdragon SoC. The price is in the upper segment, meaning you can save around 50% with the Pro model if you don't need the additional features.

Pros

+ bright and accurate LTPO display
+ very good battery life
+ fast charging
+ versatile camera setup with powerful telephoto lens
+ 3D face recognition and ultrasonic fingerprint sensor

Cons

- overheats in some stress tests
- larger battery without effect
- no UWB

Price and availability

The Magic7 RSR has a recommended retail price (RRP) of 1,899 euros and is available exclusively directly from Honor or (even cheaper) at Porsche Design. Matching accessories can be found on Amazon and elsewhere.

The Honor Magic7 RSR was designed by the traditional German company Porsche Design but is technically very similar to the Honor Magic7 Pro. In addition to the larger memory, Honor has also added a bigger battery. The camera has also been upgraded.

Specifications: Honor Magic7 RSR

Honor Magic7 RSR (Magic7 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
24 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 19.7:9, 2800 x 1280 pixel 453 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, 1 - 120 LTPO, NanoCrystal Shield, 4.320 Hz PWM-Dimming, glossy: no, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash, 1024 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, color spectrum, 3D face scan, OTG, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28 (A&B), 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28 (A&B), 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.8 x 162.7 x 77.1 ( = 0.35 x 6.41 x 3.04 in)
Battery
5850 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode (Gen. 3), Power Enhanced Chip Honor E2
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (24 mm, f/1.4-2.0, OIS) + 200 MPix (3x optical zoom, 1/1.4", f/1.88, 72 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, 12 mm), 1200 Points LiDAR Matrix; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 50 MPix (f/2.0, 25 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, SIM-Tool, 2 USB-Cables, Case, 2 100W-Charger, MagicOS 9.0, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 / IP69 | USB Copy Test: 320 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: - W/kg, Head-SAR: - W/kg | max. charging speed: 100 W (wired) / 80 W (wireless) | Communication Chip Honor C2, Security Chip Honor S1, fanless, waterproof
Weight
228 g ( = 8.04 oz / 0.5 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1900 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case and equipment - Magic7 RSR in sporty elegance

The Honor Magic7 RSR is available in Provence and Agate Grey colors. The revised exterior of the smartphone comes from Porsche Design. It is said to contain the characteristic design elements of the German company and, in this case, is inspired by the aerodynamic aesthetics of the Taycan Turbo S. The workmanship is very good, and the RSR feels great in the hand. It is also certified according to IP68 and IP69 standards.

The equipment is nominally identical to the Magic7 Pro. Still, the RSR has twice as much memory, a more powerful battery, a more light-sensitive telephoto sensor, and a better autofocus system.

(Image source: Alexander Wätzel)
(Image source: Alexander Wätzel)
(Image source: Alexander Wätzel)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
(Image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Size comparison

162.7 mm / 6.41 in 77.1 mm / 3.04 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 228 g0.503 lbs162.9 mm / 6.41 in 76.5 mm / 3.01 in 8.5 mm / 0.3346 in 213 g0.4696 lbs162.8 mm / 6.41 in 77.6 mm / 3.06 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 218 g0.4806 lbs161.3 mm / 6.35 in 75.3 mm / 2.96 in 9.35 mm / 0.3681 in 229 g0.505 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Communication and operation - Smartphone with all-inclusive

The Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR supports a wide range of mobile phone frequency bands with all modern network standards. In addition to two nano SIM cards, it supports eSIM (dual eSIM). The voice quality is good, and noise is also effectively filtered out. The user of the smartphone remains intelligible even in acoustically extreme situations, but then sounds somewhat more cramped.

 Honor's NanoCrystal Shield protects the Magic7 RSR's capacitive touchscreen and has good gliding properties. Inputs are implemented quickly and precisely. An ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is also integrated into the display, while 3D face recognition is made possible by a ToF sensor. Both systems are secure and work quickly. The linear vibration motor also provides crisp haptic feedback.

Networking
Honor Magic7 RSR
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
989 (min: 505) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
821 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1848 (min: 1807) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1567 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼97%
OnePlus 13
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
820 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
791 (min: 705) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1791 (min: 1704) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 769) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1806 (min: 1767) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1494 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1747 (min: 798) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1483 (min: 1289) MBit/s ∼92%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
984 (min: 960) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
840 (min: 800) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1565 (min: 1348) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1620 (min: 1545) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1170 (min: 987) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1019 (min: 812) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1276 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1340 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
730 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼40%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
720 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1430 (min: 521) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1372 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼85%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1848 (1807-1885)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1566 (1348-1604)
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1540 (785-1590)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1545-1651)
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø972 (505-1022)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (960-1005)
Honor Magic7 RSR 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (401-849)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø839 (800-859)

Software and sustainability - Long updates for the RSR

In terms of sustainability, the Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR is similarly positioned to its sister model, and Honor provides hardly any information on this. The outer packaging is bulkier due to the larger scope of delivery.

The RSR already benefits from Honor's Alpha Plan (our report) and receives seven years of updates. It is delivered with Google Android 15 and the in-house MagicOS 9.0, which also offers some AI functions.

Camera - Telephoto with better light-sensitivity for the Porsche Edition

Selfie with the Magic7 RSR
Selfie with the Magic7 RSR

At first glance, the camera setup of the Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR is similar to that of the Magic7 Pro. However, the top model has implemented a so-called LiDAR Matrix autofocus system, which can draw on a LiDAR matrix with 1,200 focus points. This promises both faster and more precise focusing.

The optical 3x zoom with 200 MPix has also been upgraded and, with an aperture of f/1.88, is nominally faster than that in the Magic7 Pro (aperture f/2.6). In a direct comparison with identical settings, it is easy to see that the telephoto lens of the RSR captures more light.

The other camera characteristics are identical to those of the Pro model.

Magic7 RSR (3x optical zoom, ISO 320, 10 sec.)Magic7 Pro (3x optical zoom, ISO 320, 10 sec.)
Magic7 RSR (3x optical zoom, ISO 320, 10 sec.)
Magic7 Pro (3x optical zoom, ISO 320, 10 sec.)

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide-angle5x ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker
8.7 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
4 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic7 RSR: 5.47 ∆E min: 1.49 - max: 8.74 ∆E
ColorChecker
18.7 ∆E
32.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
22 ∆E
27.8 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
18 ∆E
20 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
36.4 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
34.7 ∆E
23 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
37.2 ∆E
34 ∆E
33.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Honor Magic7 RSR: 26.18 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 38.54 ∆E

Display - Magic7 RSR with over 5,000 cd/m²

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The 6.8-inch OLED display of the Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR impresses with its balanced calibration and high brightness. Although this is almost identical on pure white and reduced white surfaces, it offers over 5,000 cd/m² when playing HDR content. If you adjust the brightness manually, up to 781 cd/m² is possible.

To protect the eyes, Honor uses high-frequency PWM dimming, a circadian night display, defocus stimulation, and blue light reduction, making it probably one of the most eye-friendly OLED displays in a smartphone.

1540
cd/m²
1548
cd/m²
1498
cd/m²
1556
cd/m²
1571
cd/m²
1538
cd/m²
1575
cd/m²
1593
cd/m²
1614
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1614 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1559.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1571 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 0.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Honor Magic7 RSR
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"
OnePlus 13
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.9"
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-20%
-100%
-34%
Brightness middle
1571
1155
-26%
1357
-14%
1041
-34%
Brightness
1559
1155
-26%
1350
-13%
1059
-32%
Brightness Distribution
93
98
5%
94
1%
96
3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
0.7
1
-43%
3.1
-343%
1
-43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
1.9
1.8
5%
4.7
-147%
2.7
-42%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.2
1.6
-33%
2.2
-83%
1.9
-58%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.3 96%
2 110%
2.23 99%
CCT
6514 100%
6503 100%
6391 102%
6697 97%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3438 cd/m² +132%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2613 cd/m² +76%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
1481 cd/m²
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
5097 cd/m²
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
3630 cd/m² -29%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2768 cd/m² -46%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 Hz
Amplitude: 14.74 %
Secondary Frequency: 4166 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Grayscale (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (color mode: Normal, color temperature: Standard, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5075 ms rise
↘ 0.5035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.721 ms rise
↘ 0.7845 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).
Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR outdoors (Image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Outdoors
Viewing angles of the Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR
Viewing angles

Performance, Emissions and battery life - The RSR stumbles in the stress test

The Snapdragon 8 Elite with a whopping 24 GB of RAM guarantees first-class performance for the Porsche Design | Honor Magic7 RSR. Unfortunately, this is not always the case in the 3DMark stress tests. On the one hand, the performance losses are high, and on the other, the more demanding Wild Life Extreme and Solar Bay benchmarks are aborted due to the risk of overheating. However, we haven't noticed any problems in everyday use so far.

The speakers of the Honor smartphone deliver a good sound but are a little too treble-heavy. The audio codec support for Bluetooth is solid but could be broader.

The battery is nominally larger than the Pro model (5,270 mAh) and provides 5,850 mAh; unfortunately, the Magic7 RSR has not yet converted this into longer runtimes. Nevertheless, these are excellent.

Charging is wireless with up to 80 watts; even 100 watts is possible with Honors SuperCharger. Two power supply units are included for the latter: one with a type C and one with a type G plug. A full charge takes just 34 minutes (50 %: 14 min., 80 %: 24 min.).

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
3200 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3099 Points +1%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
3087 Points 0%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576 (Performance Mode)
3078 Points
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
3062 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=15)
3013 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=205, last 2 years)
1544 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
10020 Points +7%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9685 Points +3%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576 (Performance Mode)
9381 Points
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
8895 Points -5%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9369 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8154 - 10401, n=15)
9267 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=205, last 2 years)
4401 Points -53%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14984 - 27169, n=13)
21807 Points +6%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
20764 Points +1%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
20637 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
19793 Points -4%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
18590 Points -10%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13982 Points -32%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
26614 Points +7%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
25785 Points +3%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
24947 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19436 - 25785, n=12)
23458 Points -6%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
21937 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (271 - 27327, n=188, last 2 years)
8823 Points -65%
Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6845 Points +3%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6754 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
6654 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (5230 - 7094, n=13)
6108 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5809 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (61 - 7094, n=193, last 2 years)
2392 Points -64%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
6907 Points +4%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
6789 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
6638 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (5161 - 7212, n=13)
6100 Points -8%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
5794 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 7212, n=192, last 2 years)
2380 Points -64%
Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12711 Points +6%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
11974 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11879 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8652 - 13318, n=13)
10842 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
10070 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2799 - 13318, n=73, last 2 years)
7845 Points -34%
Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
12395 Points +6%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
11821 Points +1%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
11706 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8664 - 13244, n=13)
10702 Points -9%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
9972 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 - 13244, n=73, last 2 years)
7782 Points -34%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
120 fps 0%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
120 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (60 - 166, n=13)
105.1 fps -12%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
60 fps -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.5 - 166, n=201, last 2 years)
53.9 fps -55%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
321 fps +7%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
301 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
259 fps -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (178 - 321, n=13)
259 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
237 fps -21%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 - 321, n=201, last 2 years)
96.2 fps -68%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
118 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
100 fps -15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (53 - 144, n=13)
92.1 fps -22%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
91 fps -23%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
60 fps -49%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=202, last 2 years)
42.4 fps -64%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
115 fps +5%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
110 fps
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
107 fps -3%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
106 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (86 - 115, n=13)
100 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 - 129, n=201, last 2 years)
38 fps -65%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
52 fps +2%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 (vulkan)
52 fps +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
51 fps
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
49 fps -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (38 - 52, n=13)
46.2 fps -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 - 53, n=202, last 2 years)
17.8 fps -65%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288 (Chrome 132)
99202 Points +4%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576 (Chrome 134)
95506 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 (Chrome 131)
92054 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (37943 - 95506, n=13)
79526 Points -17%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384 (Chrome 132)
73424 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
43074 Points -55%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
695 Points
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
689 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
670 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (287 - 738, n=11)
552 Points -21%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
522 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=42, last 2 years)
442 Points -36%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=41, last 2 years)
998 Points +44%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
695 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
661 Points -5%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
654 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (265 - 734, n=11)
542 Points -22%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
516 Points -26%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=41, last 2 years)
1677 Points +2%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576
1646 Points
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288
1430 Points -13%
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1375 Points -16%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (594 - 1708, n=11)
1238 Points -25%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384
1151 Points -30%
Max. Load
 45.7 °C
114 F
46.2 °C
115 F
45.2 °C
113 F
 
 45.1 °C
113 F
45.8 °C
114 F
43.2 °C
110 F
 
 44.9 °C
113 F
45.4 °C
114 F
43.9 °C
111 F
 
Maximum: 46.2 °C = 115 F
Average: 45 °C = 113 F
41.5 °C
107 F
42.4 °C
108 F
40.2 °C
104 F
40.7 °C
105 F
42.7 °C
109 F
40.5 °C
105 F
41.6 °C
107 F
42.9 °C
109 F
40.4 °C
105 F
Maximum: 42.9 °C = 109 F
Average: 41.4 °C = 107 F
Power Supply (max.)  25.1 °C = 77 F | Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.2 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
63 % +16%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.7 % +3%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.9 % +1%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.3 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
65 % +44%
OnePlus 13
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.7 % +13%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.6 % +12%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
45 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Honor Magic7 RSR Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø98.1 (75.5-139.1)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø106.7 (86-136.6)
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø106.2 (104.5-116.2)
Honor Magic7 RSR Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.7 (8.42-18.7)
Xiaomi 15 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø14.2 (11.9-18.3)
Asus Zenfone 12 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13 (12.7-14.1)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.243.12532.533.33121.927.94031.431.15033.540.66321.728.7802430.610017.839.812516.647.816019.756.52001953.825017.555.531516.258.440016.558.450012.367.163012.371.58001572.2100013.272.6125012.476.3160011.678.4200013.378.125001278.8315012.779.7400012.980.4500013.377.663001377800013.174.31000013.5721250013.662.51600013.455.7SPL25.489.2N0.777median 13.3median 72.2Delta1.79.638.443.230.640.119.240.421.539.636.944.224.447.719.746.315.84714.150.615.260.112.459.29.560.99.763.410.566.4970.29.873.98.976.69.479.711.579.211.278.31283.911.783.41282.31282.912.58312.981.113.38013.578.613.569.513.665.623.9930.598.2median 12median 78.31.58.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHonor Magic7 RSRSamsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Honor Magic7 RSR audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (93 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 134)
22h 16min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Honor Magic7 RSR
5850 mAh
1336 min
OnePlus 13
6000 mAh
1349 min
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
5000 mAh
1331 min
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
5410 mAh
1270 min

Notebookcheck overall rating

As is typical for Porsche Design, the price is relatively high. However, Honor also offers an excellent smartphone with a long update supply and an exclusive design.

Honor Magic7 RSR - 04/08/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
94%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 69 → 100%
Weight
88%
Battery
93%
Display
93%
Games Performance
37 / 55 → 66%
Application Performance
85 / 85 → 100%
AI Performance
45%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
87%
Average
70%
89%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
45%
Power Use
94.8%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 50.8%

Comparison of possible alternatives

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.6%
Honor Magic7 RSR
Honor Magic7 RSR
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
24 GB Memory, 1024 GB 
Amazon:
1. $8.27
BMPNLSZ Black Cover for Hono...
2. $12.98
Puccy 2 Pack Camera Lens Pro...
3. $13.99
Premium 30 Pack Stylus Compa...
List Price: 1900€
228 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"
2800x1280
453 PPI
OLED
2.
87.6%
OnePlus 13
OnePlus 13
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $13.98
uShield 2+2 Pack For OnePlus...
2. $12.98
JZG 3pcs for OnePlus 13 Scre...
3. $11.99
GiiYoon 3 PACK Screen Protec...
List Price: 720€
213 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"
3168x1440
510 PPI
AMOLED
3.
89.4%
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.20
Ailun Glass Screen Protector...
2. $7.18
Milomdoi 3 Pack Privacy Scre...
3. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 1449€
218 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.90"
3120x1440
498 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
89.5%
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi 15 Ultra ...
2. $10.99
Anbzsign 2 Pack for Xiaomi 1...
3. $5.99
Aiziki 2 Pack for Xiaomi 15 ...
List Price: 1499€
229 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash6.73"
3200x1440
521 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The smartphone with a Porsche design and improved technology - Honor Magic7 RSR review
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-04- 9 (Update: 2025-04- 9)