Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 825 vs Qualcomm Adreno 810

Qualcomm Adreno 825

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 825 is an integrated graphics adapter that debuted in April 2025. It has at least 768 unified shaders (more likely is a higher number, such as 1,024 or 1,280) but few specifics are known, as of this writing.

Qualcomm Adreno 810

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 810

The Adreno 810 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is being used for the first time in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 and is intended for use in Android-based mid-range devices.

According to Wikipedia, the GPU operates at up to 895 or 1,050 MHz. It supports common graphics APIs such as Vulkan 1.3, OpenGL ES 3.2 and OpenCL 2.0 FP, but not ray tracing.

According to Qualcomm, the GPU is up to 40% faster than the previous generation (hence probably the Adreno 710). In our benchmarks, the GPU does not stand out quite as clearly from the 710, but on average it remains well ahead.

The Adreno 810 supports displays with an extended Full HD resolution and a refresh rate of up to 144 Hz. The HDR standards HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ and HDR Vivid are also supported.

Qualcomm Adreno 825Qualcomm Adreno 810
Adreno 800 Series
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 @ 1.05 GHz
Adreno 830 compare 1536 @ 1.1 GHz
Adreno 825
Adreno 810 @ 1.05 GHz
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL 2.0, OpenCL 3.2, Vulkan 1.3OpenGL ES 3.2
technology4 nm4 nm
Displays2 Displays (max.)
Date of Announcement02.04.2025 07.05.2021
Core Speed1050 (Boost) MHz
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
PredecessorAdreno 642
CPU in Adreno 810GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 48 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 6078     avg: 6091     median: 6081.5 (26%)     max: 6122 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 6697     avg: 6720     median: 6706 (17%)     max: 6770 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 4131     avg: 4185     median: 4181 (2%)     max: 4253 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1039     avg: 1067     median: 1065.5 (1%)     max: 1094 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7.6     avg: 8.2     median: 8.3 (3%)     max: 8.8 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 17     avg: 18.5     median: 18.5 (3%)     max: 20 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 44     avg: 48.3     median: 48.5 (4%)     max: 52 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 34     avg: 34.3     median: 34 (3%)     max: 35 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 61     avg: 61.8     median: 62 (1%)     max: 62 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 84     avg: 84.8     median: 85 (4%)     max: 85 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 810
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 130     avg: 130.3     median: 130 (1%)     max: 131 fps
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 153422     avg: 187343     median: 196424 (16%)     max: 203102 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 49.36     avg: 50.3     median: 50.3 (1%)     max: 51.15 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 3315     avg: 3328     median: 3318 (1%)     max: 3351 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 3943     avg: 4286     median: 4446 (1%)     max: 4468 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 7     avg: 7.9     median: 7.9 (3%)     max: 8.85 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 810 → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
Adreno 810:
52.2  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
Adreno 810:
43.2 58.6 ~ 51 fps
ultra
Adreno 810:
36.7 40.9 ~ 39 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 810:
54.2 88.9 ~ 72 fps
high
Adreno 810:
55.4 59.5 ~ 57 fps
ultra
Adreno 810:
39.7 39.9 ~ 40 fps
Asphalt 9: Legends

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Adreno 810:
58  fps
high
Adreno 810:
58.2  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 825Qualcomm Adreno 810
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal52.2
Genshin Impact5139
PUBG Mobile725740
Asphalt 9: Legends5858.2
Qualcomm Adreno 825Qualcomm Adreno 810
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps


















< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

3
1




2


2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 09:16:20

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13111 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13034 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753600580s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 25 Jul 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.017s ... 0.018s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.018s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.018s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13111 +0.018s ... 0.036s

#9 got single benchmarks 13111 +0.004s ... 0.039s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13034 +0s ... 0.04s

#11 got single benchmarks 13034 +0.007s ... 0.047s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.047s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.053s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.053s

#16 Got 13 rows for game benchmarks. +0.003s ... 0.056s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.056s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.056s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.002s ... 0.058s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.058s

#21 return log +0.001s ... 0.058s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)