Notebookcheck Logo
Nothing Phone (3a) (image: Daniel Schmidt)

The elegant all-rounder presses all the right buttons - Nothing Phone (3a) review

With an extra AI button.

Why spend more than $380 on a smartphone? For this price, you get the Nothing Phone (3a) with excellent everyday performance, great runtimes, 6 years of updates, a 120-Hz AMOLED screen and the unmistakable Glyph design. It also features a zoom camera, which is a real rarity for a mid-range phone.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict on the Nothing Phone (3a)

The Nothing Phone (3a) is by no means a feature monster, but it is one of the best smartphones currently available in the price range of up to $400. Its Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 is easily enough for everyday tasks and has enough reserves for gaming. Other advantages include its high-quality finish including a glass back and Glyph interface, good cameras, very smooth Nothing OS as well as long battery life and fast charging. Its 6-year update guarantee is also a welcome bonus.

However, if you want better cameras, the Nothing Phone (3a) Pro and its 3x telephoto zoom may be more of interest to you. The phone's AI features shouldn't play a major role in whether you purchase it, as they are still in the test phase.

Pros

+ unique design & glass back
+ responsive system
+ IP64 certification
+ bright 120-Hz display
+ good main camera
+ 6 years of security updates
+ long runtimes & fast charging

Cons

- AI features still in test phase
- not completely waterproof
- no eSIM support
- no wireless charging
- no power supply included

Price and availability

You can currently purchase the Nothing Phone (3a) via Nothing's online store for $379.

Nothing has released a new version of its mid-range smartphone. The Nothing Phone (3a) replaces the Nothing Phone (2a) and features all the typical Nothing trademarks, namely the Glyph interface and transparent back. The successor model has improved in two areas in particular: cameras and artificial intelligence.

Its camera ensemble has gained a lens, which means that the Nothing Phone (3a) now has a telephoto camera with 2x optical zoom in addition to the main and ultra-wide-angle lenses. And similar to Apple, there is also a new physical button. Named the Essential Key, it sits next to the power button and brings the Nothing Phone (3a)'s AI functions to life.

Specifications

Nothing Phone (3a) (Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 8 x 1.8 - 2.6 GHz, Cortex-A720 / A520
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.77 inch 19.9:9, 2392 x 1080 pixel 387 PPI, capacitive, AMOLED, 1000 Hz touch sampling rate, 3000 nits maximum brightness, Panda Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), 4G (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66), 5G (Band n1, n2, n3, n5, n7, n8, n12, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n48, n66, n77, n78), 4x4 MIMO, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.35 x 163.52 x 77.5 ( = 0.33 x 6.44 x 3.05 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.88, 1/1.57" sensor, 84,5° FOV, OIS & EIS, AF, 24mm) + 50MP telephoto camera (2x optical zoom, f/2.0, 1/2.75" sensor, 49,5° FOV, EIS, AF, 50mm) + 8MP ultrawide camera (f/2.2, 1/4" sensor, 120° FOV, 15mm)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2, 1/3.44" sensor, 89° FOV, 22mm
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, safety information, NothingOS 3.1, 24 Months Warranty, 50W max. charging speed; Head SAR 0.99 W/kg, Body SAR 1.29 W/kg; GPS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Beidou (B1), Galilei (E1), QZSS (L1); Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, LHDC V1/V2/V3/V5, Opus, fanless
Weight
201 g ( = 7.09 oz / 0.44 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Nothing Phone (3a) with a glass back

Nothing has retained its design language with the Nothing Phone (3a), as it once again has a transparent back, which is now made of glass instead of plastic. Unlike the Nothing Phone (2a), its IP64 certification means that the smartphone is significantly better protected against the elements—although it isn't completely waterproof.

Under its transparent back again sits the Glyph interface, which has been slightly modified compared to the Nothing Phone (2a), but still consists of three LED strips. The rest of the design on the back isn't based on the look of the New York subway map this time, but is instead inspired by Japan. Another new feature is a second button next to the power button, which can be used to activate the AI functions. The front and back are connected by a sturdy aluminum frame.

Weighing in at 201 grams, the Nothing Phone (3a) is slightly heavier than its predecessor. This is mainly due to its slightly larger size, as the phone's AMOLED panel has increased in size from 6.7 to 6.77 inches. In addition to our test device's white colorway, you can select between blue and black.

Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Daniel Schmidt)
Nothing Phone (3a) (image source: Daniel Schmidt)

Size comparison

166.1 mm / 6.54 in 77.2 mm / 3.04 in 8.3 mm / 0.3268 in 205 g0.4519 lbs163.52 mm / 6.44 in 77.5 mm / 3.05 in 8.35 mm / 0.3287 in 201 g0.4431 lbs162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 185.5 g0.409 lbs162.4 mm / 6.39 in 75.7 mm / 2.98 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.74 mm / 6.37 in 76.32 mm / 3 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 209 g0.4608 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - Up to 12 GB RAM and 256 GB storage on the Nothing phone

In the DACH region, where this test was carried out, the Nothing Phone (3a) is available in two memory/storage variants, namely with 8 GB RAM and 128 GB storage, and with 12 + 256 GB. In India, Nothing also sells the smartphone in a third variant with 8 + 256 GB.

In terms of its other features, the Nothing Phone (3a) takes a lot from the Nothing Phone (2a), but uses the latest Bluetooth version, namely Bluetooth 5.4. Two nano SIM cards fit into its SIM slot, but no eSIMs can be activated. The phone's USB-C port runs at USB 2.0 speed and achieved a data throughput of 28.1 MB/s using our external Samsung PSSD T7 reference SSD.

Left: volume rocker (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Left: volume rocker (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Right: Essential Key, power button (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Right: Essential Key, power button (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Top: microphone (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Top: microphone (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Bottom: dual-SIM, microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Bottom: dual-SIM, microphone, USB-C 2.0, speaker (image source: Manuel Masiero)

Software - The Nothing Phone (3a) with a local AI assistant

The Nothing Phone (3a) runs Nothing OS 3.1, which is based on Android 15. It hardly differs from stock Android in terms of how you operate it, but it features its own accents in the shape of its black and white design and pixel look. If desired, you can switch to the classic Android look at any time.

The Glyph interface on the back consists of three LED strips that can display notifications, incoming calls and a timer, among other things. What exactly should be displayed can be configured in detail by the user.

The Essential Key, which is located next to the power button, calls up the Essential Space. This is an AI hub designed to help users with everyday tasks. If you press the Essential key once, the smartphone takes a screenshot to which you can add a text or voice memo. The app then automatically analyzes the information, saves it in the Essential Space and reminds the user of upcoming appointments or interesting products, for example.

If you press the Essential Key twice, you switch directly to the Essential Hub where you can browse through all the content you have added so far. Essential Space has nothing to do with clouds, as it works locally. It is currently still in the test phase, but had no problems understanding us in German during our test. It is now also possible to add camera recordings. Other hub features such as a cataloging function for images, text and audio will follow in the coming months.

Nothing is set to provide 3 years of Android upgrades for its smartphone. Android security updates will be available for 6 years.

Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)

Sustainability

With a carbon footprint of 51.3 kg CO2, the Nothing Phone (3a) is said to be the most sustainable Nothing smartphone to date. Its aluminum frame is made from 100 percent recycled aluminum. Six circuit boards are made from 100% recycled tin. Nothing states that 85% of the steel used is recycled. Over 60 percent of the plastic parts are said to come from sustainable sources.

Nothing doesn't offer spare parts or repair manuals for the Nothing Phone (3a). However, the smartphone can be sent directly to the manufacturer for repair.

Communication and GNSS - The Nothing Phone (3a) with WiFi 6 and precise GPS

The Nothing Phone (3a) supports a good range of frequencies for 5G. It connects to 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz WLAN networks via WiFi 6. Connected to our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, it achieved fast and largely stable transfer rates that peaked at 938 Mb/s.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
938 (466min - 956max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=139)
862 MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=193, last 2 years)
722 MBit/s -23%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s -28%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
398 (193min - 410max) MBit/s -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
373 (183min - 385max) MBit/s -60%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=137)
834 MBit/s 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
831 (777min - 861max) MBit/s
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=191, last 2 years)
711 MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
377 (187min - 380max) MBit/s -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (340min - 366max) MBit/s -58%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1437 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (614 - 1902, n=21)
1256 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G75
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
614 (224min, 294.76P1 - 786max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Motorola Moto G75
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1434 (1076min, 1112.83P1 - 1626max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (743 - 1816, n=21)
1228 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø923 (466-956)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
Nothing Phone (3a) 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (777-861)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outside
GPS reception outside

The Nothing Phone (3a) determines its current position using the satellite navigation services GPS, Glonass, Beidou, Galileo and QZSS, each of which operates in single-band mode. On a walk of just over 3.5 kilometers, the smartphone located us as precisely as the Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, making it well suited for navigation purposes.

GPS test: summary
GPS test: summary
GPS test: routes
GPS test: routes
GPS test: pond
GPS test: pond

Telephone functions and call quality - The Nothing Phone (3a) without eSIM support

The Nothing Phone (3a) supports VoLTE and Wi-Fi calls, but no eSIMs.

It delivers good call quality and can suppress ambient noise quite efficiently. This works just as reliably in loudspeaker mode, although we often had to speak a little louder during our test in this case, as we otherwise sounded too quiet for the person we were talking to.

Cameras - Triple camera with 2x optical zoom and Glyph photography assistance

Photo taken using selfie camera
Photo taken using selfie camera

Like its predecessor, the Nothing Phone (3a) has a 32 MP selfie camera that offers good image quality and achieves a solid bokeh effect in portrait mode. It can record videos at up to 1080p at 60 frames per second.

Instead of a dual camera like the Nothing Phone (2a), the Nothing Phone (3a) now has a triple sensor. A new feature is its 50 MP telephoto lens with a 2x optical zoom. The main camera still has a resolution of 50 MP, while the ultra-wide-angle lens has been reduced from 50 to 8 MP.

In daylight, the Nothing Phone (3a) rewarded us with beautiful photos during our test. Although they aren't quite flagship quality, they look very good for this price range. The images' sharpness is good and the colors appear nice and crisp without looking unrealistic. Even in low light conditions, the main camera still takes decent photos. The Glyph interface can be used to brighten up subjects.

Its photographic possibilities are extended by a 2x telephoto zoom, which captures lots of detail up to a magnification of 5x. Beyond that, however, things quickly become blurred, especially if you use its maximum zoom level of 30x. The phone's ultra-wide-angle lens is the weakest in its camera ensemble because, with a resolution of 8 MP, its possibilities are quite limited. Its images are not particularly sharp and are noisy at the edges.

The device's main and telephoto cameras record videos in decent quality in up to 4K at 30 frames per second. If 60fps is required, you can only record at 1080p.

Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera
Photo taken using main camera

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photoDaylightUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

In our test lab, the phone's main camera once again proved its good imaging performance. It captured colors precisely and displayed the test chart clearly even in 1 lux of residual light.

ColorChecker
7.9 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (3a): 5.93 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 12.26 ∆E
ColorChecker
26.6 ∆E
44.8 ∆E
35 ∆E
32.3 ∆E
39.1 ∆E
54.1 ∆E
42.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
42.6 ∆E
25.9 ∆E
58.7 ∆E
35.5 ∆E
38.3 ∆E
57.3 ∆E
61 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
23.3 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (3a): 38.91 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 61.01 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Nothing Phone (3a) without a 50-watt power supply

The Nothing Phone (3a) comes with a USB-C cable, a SIM tool and a booklet with safety instructions. A protective film is applied to its display straight out of the box.

The Nothing online store offers only a small selection of accessories for the phone. In addition to protective covers and headphones, you can also get a 45-watt power adapter there. This would be enough for the Nothing Phone (2a), but the Nothing Phone (3a) can be charged at up to 50 watts.

In the United States, the Nothing Phone (3a) is covered by a standard 12-month warranty.

Input devices and operation - Responsive display with a 1000-Hz sampling rate

Although the Nothing Phone (3a) is equipped with a mid-range SoC in the shape of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, it feels like a high-end smartphone during use.

On the one hand, this is because of the display's high touch sampling rate of 1000 Hz and on the other hand, it's thanks to Nothing OS, which runs super smoothly and is hardly slowed down by multiple apps working at the same time. Only very demanding apps occasionally cause minor hiccups or short delays. The phone's good operation is rounded off by the precise feedback delivered by the finely adjustable vibration motor.

You can unlock the smartphone using the fingerprint sensor located under the display, and it recognized us in 9 out of 10 attempts during our test. Logging in using a 2D facial scan via the selfie camera is also possible, but less secure.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display - Bright AMOLED panel with PWM dimming

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The smartphone's AMOLED display has a resolution of 2392 x 1080 pixels and dynamically adjusts its frame rate to 30, 60, 90 or 120 Hz in the standard setting, depending on the content being displayed. In addition to HDR10 and HDR10+, it also supports HLG.

In terms of the display's brightness, the Nothing Phone (3a) has made a big leap forward—at least according to the manufacturer. When displaying SDR content, the average brightness we noted was 1274 cd/m² (APL18: 1202 cd/m²), so slightly higher than its predecessor. Even so, the AMOLED panel is a long way from the promised peak brightness of 3000 cd/m². This also applies to HDR content, where we were able to elicit a maximum of 1179 cd/m² from the display.

The AMOLED screen runs at a low PWM frequency of 90 Hz. At the same time, it uses a PWM dimming frequency to protect the eyes of sensitive users. We measured 741 Hz, while Nothing specifies the value at 2160 Hz.

1291
cd/m²
1278
cd/m²
1264
cd/m²
1290
cd/m²
1287
cd/m²
1252
cd/m²
1281
cd/m²
1276
cd/m²
1249
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1291 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1274.2 cd/m² Minimum: 2.23 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1287 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.26
Nothing Phone (3a)
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Motorola Moto G75
IPS, 2388x1080, 6.8"
Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-1%
19%
6%
14%
23%
Brightness middle
1287
947
-26%
1033
-20%
904
-30%
1147
-11%
1156
-10%
Brightness
1274
946
-26%
1042
-18%
912
-28%
1146
-10%
1150
-10%
Brightness Distribution
97
95
-2%
96
-1%
97
0%
96
-1%
98
1%
Black Level *
0.46
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.9
2.53
-33%
1.6
16%
2.1
-11%
1.6
16%
1.1
42%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.7
4.91
44%
2.5
71%
2.8
68%
3.7
57%
3.1
64%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.4
2.1
38%
1.2
65%
2.2
35%
2.3
32%
1.6
53%
Gamma
2.26 97%
2.237 98%
2.07 106%
2.1 105%
2.27 97%
2.22 99%
CCT
7072 92%
6733 97%
6482 100%
6478 100%
6368 102%
6304 103%
Contrast
2059

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz
Amplitude: 13.58 %
Secondary Frequency: 740 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8485 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).

Our measurements using a spectrophotometer and the Calman analysis software revealed that the screen can reproduce colors and grayscale fairly accurately. The picture quality is best using the settings below. The panel still shows a slightly cool display (color temperature 7072 K), but this isn't terribly noticeable during operation.

Color accuracy (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.96 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.44 ms rise
↘ 0.518 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.71 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.626 ms rise
↘ 1.087 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms).

The Nothing phone can be used well outdoors. If you avoid direct sunlight, the viewing angle-stable AMOLED display is almost always perfectly readable. Deactivating the brightness sensor is of little use, as the screen's maximum brightness is then 760 cd/m².

Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Viewing angles (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Viewing angles (image source: Manuel Masiero)

Performance - The Nothing Phone (3a) with the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3

The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 makes the Nothing Phone (3a) a fast mid-range smartphone. During the synthetic benchmarks, it was almost always in first place, at least among the comparison devices, even if its lead was only minor in some cases. In turn, the Nothing Phone (2a) was better in the AI benchmarks UL Procyon AI and AImark.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=204, last 2 years)
1543 Points +32%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1171 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1162 - 1179, n=4)
1170 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points -13%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1011 Points -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points -19%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=204, last 2 years)
4393 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (3232 - 3298, n=4)
3255 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3250 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2887 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points -20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points -29%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)
1083 Points +25%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (854 - 894, n=4)
876 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
864 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
779 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
739 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
726 Points -16%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)
3654 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (2894 - 3242, n=4)
3034 Points +5%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
2894 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2741 Points -5%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
2645 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2100 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=133, last 2 years)
1328327 Points +67%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
795329 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (756800 - 795329, n=3)
779866 Points -2%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
620511 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
15606 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=196, last 2 years)
13812 Points -11%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
13807 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (10617 - 15606, n=4)
13640 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points -32%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=162, last 2 years)
983 Points +25%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
785 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (759 - 785, n=3)
768 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points -3%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
737 Points -6%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points -18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
585 Points -25%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=161, last 2 years)
6764 Points +22%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5402 - 5543, n=3)
5458 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points -15%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4545 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points -20%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points -34%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=161, last 2 years)
10583 Points +22%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
9006 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (7930 - 10153, n=3)
8918 Points +3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8672 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points -18%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -22%
Memory
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7675 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=161, last 2 years)
7461 Points -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (5642 - 8078, n=3)
7132 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points -38%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -40%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
4554 Points -41%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -44%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=161, last 2 years)
19339 Points +116%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +19%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8662 - 9482, n=3)
9032 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8951 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
7298 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points -55%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=161, last 2 years)
1604 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1585 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1566 - 1585, n=3)
1573 Points -1%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
1425 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points -10%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -45%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +205%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=152, last 2 years)
17965 Points +108%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
9416 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8626 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (8460 - 8652, n=3)
8579 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points -31%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=141, last 2 years)
27234 Points +3688%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +1487%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1019 Points +42%
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, Adreno 710, 8192
729 Points +1%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
719 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (702 - 719, n=2)
711 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -24%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=36, last 2 years)
930 Points +830%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
100 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (96.6 - 100, n=2)
98.3 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
88.8 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points -33%
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=40, last 2 years)
4543 Points +227%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1388 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
  (1246 - 1388, n=3)
1336 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points -83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points -85%

The Snapdragon 7s Gen 3's Adreno 810 GPU helps the Nothing Phone (3a) to achieve good graphics performance, however, with the exception of 3DMark Wild Life, it always remained below the level of its predecessor. The AMOLED display was slowed down to 60 Hz in GFXBench.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1063 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
842 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
793 Points -25%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points +9%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1057 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
846 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points -23%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
801 Points -24%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4186 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3129 Points -25%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3069 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points -33%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4140 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3998 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3141 Points -21%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3034 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points -29%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
381 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
346 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
254 Points -33%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
382 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points -10%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
256 Points -33%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5641 Points +23%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4585 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points -4%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3437 Points -25%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6770 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5220 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2277 Points -66%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6122 Points
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5308 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2462 Points -60%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
106 fps +77%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +57%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps +43%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +22%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
130 fps
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
124 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps -9%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps -45%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +13%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
65 fps +8%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +15%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps -5%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps -7%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps -27%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +4%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps -13%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps -15%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -47%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +8%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps -10%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps -11%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -45%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +17%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -14%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps -14%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -48%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +18%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -12%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +18%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -29%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps -32%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -35%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps -66%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +4%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps -35%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -61%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -23%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -62%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +7%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8.8 fps
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps -26%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps -68%

The Nothing Phone (3a) showed its best side when it came to browser performance. The smartphone was the first to cross the finish line in all benchmarks, which was likely primarily due to its more up-to-date browser version. During everyday use, pages load quickly and can be scrolled through swiftly.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
161.602 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (118 - 161.6, n=3)
137.4 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=171, last 2 years)
135.1 Points -16%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
126.402 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points -31%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -46%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -53%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
176 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=151, last 2 years)
164.2 runs/min -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (144 - 176, n=3)
163.3 runs/min -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min -39%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min -39%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
105 runs/min -40%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -41%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=91, last 2 years)
12.8 runs/min +14%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
11.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (8.58 - 11.2, n=3)
9.93 runs/min -11%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
6.97 runs/min -38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min -39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min -39%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min -41%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -48%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
149 Points
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
140 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (110 - 149, n=3)
128 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=162, last 2 years)
125.9 Points -16%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points -25%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -33%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
45346 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)
42512 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (37338 - 45346, n=4)
41140 Points -9%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
37483 Points -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -59%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -82%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=171, last 2 years)
1439 ms * -67%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms * -31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * -27%
Motorola Moto G75 (Chrome 131)
1077.4 ms * -25%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 (862 - 1044, n=3)
927 ms * -7%
Nothing Phone (3a) (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
862.4 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to its UFS 3.1 storage, the Nothing Phone (3a) delivers above-average data throughput rates for its class, which is reflected in relatively short charging times. During our test, competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G and the Xiaomi Poco X7 couldn't keep up with their UFS 2.2 storage.

Nothing Phone (3a)Motorola Moto G75Nothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GXiaomi Poco X7Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
0%
4%
-50%
-10%
-24%
28%
48%
Sequential Read 256KB
1031.34
1023.1
-1%
1028.37
0%
529.32
-49%
950.62
-8%
947.4
-8%
Sequential Write 256KB
1001.28
868.4
-13%
952
-5%
270
-73%
792.56
-21%
915.23
-9%
Random Read 4KB
245.48
285.3
16%
273.19
11%
244.24
-1%
257.91
5%
100.16
-59%
Random Write 4KB
285.24
279.5
-2%
311.8
9%
62.59
-78%
245.16
-14%
226.88
-20%

Games - Up to 60fps is possible

Generally, displaying games smoothly isn't a problem for the Nothing Phone (3a). Still, more than 60fps is usually only possible when running older games. In top titles like Genshin Impact, however, you may still be able to reach this, but with the graphics details lowered. Nevertheless, we were still able to run Genshin Impact quite well during our test, reaching an average of 37fps even at maximum detail level—although we did note some stutters from time to time.

We tested the game frame rates using Gamebench.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560657075808590Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a); Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.5.0m: Ø58.4 (47-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.5.0m: Ø58.5 (45-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.5.0_31400259_31451966: Ø59.2 (48-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.5.0_31400259_31451966: Ø41 (29-54)
Nothing Phone (3a); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.7.0: Ø89.4 (81-91)
Nothing Phone (3a); PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.7.0: Ø59.9 (57-61)
Nothing Phone (3a); PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.7.0: Ø39.9 (34-41)

Emissions - No noteable throttling under load

Temperature

During use, the Nothing Phone (3a) can get quite warm but always remains within a thermally safe range. On the surface, the temperature rose to up to 46.5 °C during our test. Internally, the Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 was unimpressed by this, as we measured no significant drop in SoC performance during the 3DMark stress tests.

Max. Load
 45.9 °C
115 F
46.5 °C
116 F
43.6 °C
110 F
 
 45.5 °C
114 F
45.4 °C
114 F
42.4 °C
108 F
 
 45.3 °C
114 F
42.6 °C
109 F
40.9 °C
106 F
 
Maximum: 46.5 °C = 116 F
Average: 44.2 °C = 112 F
40.3 °C
105 F
41.6 °C
107 F
41.8 °C
107 F
38.9 °C
102 F
41.1 °C
106 F
43 °C
109 F
36 °C
97 F
40.7 °C
105 F
41 °C
106 F
Maximum: 43 °C = 109 F
Average: 40.5 °C = 105 F
Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.5 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.5 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 %
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.8 %
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % 0%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a)
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.3 %
Motorola Moto G75
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.6 % -1%
0510152025Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.28 (6.27-6.29)
Motorola Moto G75 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.82 (4.8-4.83)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.06 (5.05-5.07)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.8 (23.8-23.9)
Motorola Moto G75 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.2 (18.1-18.2)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.7-25)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.7 (18.7-18.8)
Nothing Phone (3a) Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.81 (2.8-2.81)
Motorola Moto G75 Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø1.891 (1.884-1.903)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)

Speakers

Nothing has equipped the Nothing Phone (3a) with stereo speakers. They reproduce mids and highs very linearly. However, bass tones are almost completely absent from the sound mix.

Users can connect external audio devices via USB-C and Bluetooth 5.4. The phone's list of supported Bluetooth codecs is extensive and includes SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LDAC, LC3 and Opus.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.238.22532.5413121.935.24031.438.85033.538.16321.732.4802432.410017.836.812516.643.716019.754.62001952.725017.559.731516.261.340016.562.750012.369.863012.371.78001572.6100013.276.2125012.477.6160011.676.1200013.37725001278.6315012.781.1400012.979.8500013.380.963001380.8800013.180.11000013.579.91250013.672.11600013.464.5SPL25.490.5N0.785.9median 13.3median 76.1Delta1.78.927.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNothing Phone (3a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nothing Phone (3a) audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - 5000-mAh battery with long runtimes guaranteed

During our test, the Nothing Phone (3a) showed no major anomalies in terms of its power consumption. Only when idling did it sometimes require a little more power than its competitors.

Its 5000 mAh battery can be charged at up to 50 watts. A full charging cycle took 1:03 hours in our test with a 65-watt power supply from a third-party provider (Ugreen 2C1A). This means that the smartphone doesn't charge quite as quickly as Nothing claims (56 minutes) and is generally as fast as the Nothing Phone (2a). Although the latter only supports a lower maximum charging power of 45 watts, it is fully charged after exactly one hour with the same power adapter.

According to Nothing, the device's battery should still have more than 90 percent of its capacity after 1200 charging cycles. This corresponds to more than 3 years and 3 months of daily charging.

Power consumption

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.03 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.93 / 1.67 / 1.68 Watt
Load midlight 3.69 / 4.75 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-38%
-22%
-45%
-15%
-8%
2%
-36%
Idle Minimum *
0.93
0.8
14%
0.81
13%
0.89
4%
1.15
-24%
1.09
-17%
0.963 ?(0.89 - 1.07, n=3)
-4%
Idle Average *
1.67
1.1
34%
2.01
-20%
1.99
-19%
1.55
7%
1.28
23%
Idle Maximum *
1.68
1.5
11%
2.07
-23%
2.14
-27%
1.57
7%
1.31
22%
Load Average *
3.69
8.7
-136%
4.16
-13%
4.57
-24%
3.87
-5%
3.25
12%
Load Maximum *
4.75
10.1
-113%
7.91
-67%
12.31
-159%
7.66
-61%
8.62
-81%
5.68 ?(4.75 - 7.52, n=3)
-20%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.99 (0.85-4.75)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.33 (1.051-6.28)
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.049 (1.028-1.222)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.09 (3.94-4.22)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.67-3.6)
Nothing Phone (3a) Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.049 (1.028-1.222)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)

Runtimes

The Nothing Phone (3a) is able to draw good runtimes from its 5000 mAh battery, putting it well ahead in our comparison. The Nothing Phone (2a) and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G were roughly on par. Only a few other mid-range smartphones, such as the Motorola Moto G75, currently run for even longer.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
42h 47min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 134.0.6998.135)
20h 33min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
26h 50min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 38min
Battery Runtime Idle: Chrome 134.0.6998.135
Nothing Phone (3a)
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G75
5000 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Battery Runtime
9%
2%
-5%
-10%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2567
3022
18%
2522
-2%
2600
1%
1800
-30%
H.264
1610
1332
-17%
1513
-6%
1401
-13%
1019
-37%
WiFi v1.3
1233
1174
-5%
1011
-18%
902
-27%
773
-37%
1049
-15%
Load
218
302
39%
293
34%
262
20%
361
66%

Notebookcheck total rating

During our test, the Nothing Phone (3a) delivered a very good price-to-performance ratio and was above average by mid-range standards. However, it features no eSIM support and its AI functions are not yet complete at market launch.

Nothing Phone (3a) - 04/07/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
89%
Games Performance
18 / 55 → 33%
Application Performance
65 / 85 → 77%
AI Performance
13%
Temperature
85%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
77%
Average
73%
79%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
87.8%
Materials
65%
Packaging
85%
Power Use
97.3%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
83.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 76.4%

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
79.2%
Nothing Phone (3a)
Nothing Phone (3a)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 810 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $4.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
2. $7.99
Suttkue for Nothing Phone (3...
3. $9.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design...
201 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.77"
2392x1080
387 PPI
AMOLED
2.
77.4%
Motorola Moto G75
Motorola Moto G75
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 710 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $8.60
Zeking (2 Set for Motorola M...
3. $3.59
Heenjer 2 Pack for Motorola ...
List Price: 299€
205 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.78"
2388x1080
387 PPI
IPS
3.
86.9% v7 (old)
Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.79
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
2. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $5.99
Foluu Clear Case for Nothing...
List Price: 329€
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1084
394 PPI
AMOLED
4.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
75.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $5.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $6.25
Anoowkoa[2 pack for Redmi No...
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
6.
77.7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $10.79
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
3. $227.50
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro 4G Lte Gs...
185.5 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > The elegant all-rounder presses all the right buttons - Nothing Phone (3a) review
Manuel Masiero, 2025-04- 9 (Update: 2025-04- 9)