Notebookcheck Logo

Nothing Phone (2) review: LED effects in a fairly priced high-end smartphone

The Glyph is back. The Phone (2) is considerably more expensive than Nothing's debut smartphone, but this time it has real high-end power. Find out in our review whether it has to the potential to be a real flagship killer thanks to its iconic Glyph interface and its solid price-performance ratio.
Nothing Phone (2)

Nothing achieved respectable success with the Phone (1) and now the manufacturer intends to expand its lineup with the new Phone (2). Thanks to a real high-end SoC and even faster charging, the new model is expected to give competing flagship devices a run for their money. Although the Phone (2) is significantly more expensive than its predecessor, the decision to create a higher-quality device this year makes sense, as the Phone (1) can remain in the lineup and buyers have more choice.

Of course, the iconic Glyph interface made of numerous LEDs on the rear side is back and it has even been refined in some areas. Whether you should invest up to US$750 for the Nothing Phone (2) is something we examine in detail in our review.

Nothing Phone (2) (Phone Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.70 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 394 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, 240 Hz sampling rate, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 228 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B25/​B26/​B28/​B30/​B32/​B34/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B42/​B48/​B66/​B71), 5G (n1/​n2/​n3/​n5/​n7/​n8/​n12/​n20/​n25/​n28/​n30/​n38/​n40/​n41/​n66/​n71/​n75/​n77/​n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 162.1 x 76.4 ( = 0.34 x 6.38 x 3.01 in)
Battery
4700 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 45 Watt charging, 15 Watt wireless charging, ​5W reverse charging
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.88, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/​60fps (Camera 1); 50.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/​2.45, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP54-certified, Glyph interface, fanless
Weight
201.2 g ( = 7.1 oz / 0.44 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
699 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
87.4 %
07/2023
Nothing Phone (2)
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
201.2 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080
85.6 %
07/2022
Nothing Phone (1)
SD 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L
193.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
86.4 %
01/2023
Xiaomi 12T
Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6
202 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86.4 %
07/2023
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
SD 778G 4G, Adreno 642L
188 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2652x1200
87 %
08/2022
OnePlus 10T
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
203.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"2412x1080

Case - Glyph interface with more options

The Nothing Phone (2) is somewhat heavier and slightly longer than its predecessor, but it also offers a larger screen and significantly more performance. Once again, the Nothing phone is protected by Gorilla Glass 5 on both sides, with the transparent back revealing the cable channels and wireless charging spiral. The rear glass is now curved so that the Nothing Phone (2) fits comfortably in the hand.

The sides are made of an aluminum frame that is reminiscent of current iPhones with its angular design and pill-shaped buttons. The Phone (2) comes in either Dark Grey or White

The workmanship is pleasing: clean material transitions and small gaps create a high-quality look. However, we noticed in the course of our review that the smartphone can warp after prolonged exposure to the sun and the gaps then become larger. The warping subsides once it cools down, but previous reports about water and dust under the back of the predecessor make us wonder.

The housing is protected according to IP54, so the protection against splash water has been slightly improved compared to the predecessor. You shouldn't go swimming with Nothing Phone (2) though.

We like the fact that Nothing prints the device's CO2 footprint on the package and attempts to keep the environmental impact of the smartphone as low as possible via various measures, such as recycling materials in the device and plastic-free packaging. A detailed sustainability report on the Phone (2) can be found on the website.

The glyph interface is the design highlight of the smartphone. Underneath the transparent glass back there is a pattern of white LEDs that can simulate a count-down timer and display notifications, of which the number and function has been significantly expanded in the Phone (2). You can now use the Glyph Composer to create your own ringtones, and some third-party providers such as Uber are now using the function, for example, to display the time until the driver reaches their desired location.

Nothing Phone (2)
Nothing Phone (2)
Nothing Phone (2)
Nothing Phone (2)
Nothing Phone (2)
Nothing Phone (2)
Nothing Phone (2)

Size comparison

164.2 mm / 6.46 inch 74.4 mm / 2.93 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 188 g0.4145 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 8.75 mm / 0.3445 inch 203.5 g0.4486 lbs163.1 mm / 6.42 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.6 mm / 0.3386 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs162.1 mm / 6.38 inch 76.4 mm / 3.01 inch 8.6 mm / 0.3386 inch 201.2 g0.4436 lbs159.2 mm / 6.27 inch 75.8 mm / 2.98 inch 8.3 mm / 0.3268 inch 193.5 g0.4266 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Equipment - No eSIM support on the Nothing Phone (2)

The Nothing Phone (2) is available in three memory variants:

  • 128 GB storage / 8 GB RAM: US$599 
  • 256 GB storage / 12 GB RAM: US$749
  • 512 GB storage / 12 GB RAM: US$859

A microSD reader is missing, but there are 2 slots for nano-SIMs. Unfortunately, eSIMs are not supported. The USB-C port is still only connected internally via USB 2.0, so data transfers are slower and image output via USB cable is not possible.

Left: volume rocker
Left: volume rocker
Right: standby button
Right: standby button
Top: microphone
Top: microphone
Bottom: SIM slot, USB-C port, speaker
Bottom: SIM slot, USB-C port, speaker

Software - Also available wihout Nothing design upon request

Nothing OS 2.0 is based on Android 13 and is very stylish with its pixelated black and white design, but you have to get used to the icons without labels. Those who prefer the classic Android look can select this option during the setup or easily restore it afterwards, since Nothing implements its design mainly via icon packs and widgets that you can remove or change at any time.

No third-party advertising apps are preinstalled. The security patches on our device were from June 2023 and thus still reasonably up to date at the time of review. Nothing also released a number of minor updates with detailed patch notes during our review to improve the smartphone's features. Overall, the smartphone is expected to get security updates every 2 months for 4 years. In addition, 3 new Android versions are intended for the smartphone.

Software Nothing Phone (2)
Software Nothing Phone (2)
Software Nothing Phone (2)

Communication and GNSS - Fast WiFi 6E on the Nothing phone

The Nothing Phone (2) comes with WiFi 6E, so it can take advantage of the less-used 6 GHz band. Under testing with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router, the WLAN connection proved to be quite stable after initial difficulties, but it is very unevenly fast when sending and receiving data, just like the Phone (1). Overall, the speeds are clearly above those of the predecessor.

Thanks to the many supported 4G and 5G frequencies, the Nothing Phone (2) can be used worldwide. The signal quality was consistently good during our 2-week review period and on par with other high-end smartphones.

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
934 (768min - 949max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
888 (833min - 922max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
728 (460min - 795max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=211, last 2 years)
651 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
981 (965min - 1014max) MBit/s
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
933 (865min - 958max) MBit/s
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 (585min - 893max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=212, last 2 years)
687 MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (229 - 1894, n=61, last 2 years)
1536 MBit/s +2%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1513 (1097min - 1582max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
946 (926min - 951max) MBit/s -37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (598 - 1840, n=61, last 2 years)
1364 MBit/s +71%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
799 (577min - 890max) MBit/s
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
598 (517min - 731max) MBit/s -25%
0801602403204004805606407208008809601040112012001280136014401520Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1513 (1097-1582)
Nothing Phone (2); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø799 (577-890)
GPS test outdoors
GPS test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

As soon as you step outside with the Nothing Phone (2), you are immediately pinpointed at an accuracy of 3 meters. All major satellite networks are supported, but not the SBAS system for even greater accuracy. Satellite positioning also takes place indoors, but this is not quite as accurate.

The smartphone's localization capabilities also have to undergo real-world testing, so we jumped on our bikes and took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch for comparison. The Nothing Phone (2) is very accurate; we observed only minimal deviations from the route taken in two places. We can thus highly recommended the smartphone as a navigation device.

Tracking the Nothing Phone (2) – overview
Tracking the Nothing Phone (2) – overview
Tracking the Nothing Phone (2) – loop
Tracking the Nothing Phone (2) – loop
Tracking the Nothing Phone (2) – bridge
Tracking the Nothing Phone (2) – bridge
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 – overview
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 – overview
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 – loop
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 – loop
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 – bridge
Tracking the Garmin Venu 2 – bridge

Telephony and Voice Quality - It sounds better via loudspeaker

Nothing uses Android's standard phone app, so users who switch from other brands should find their way around right away.

The call quality is decent overall, but has a few weaknesses: the internal earpiece sounds a little muffled and neither the normal nor the hands-free microphone pick up quiet voices. If you listen to the other party via loudspeaker, the conversation sounds much clearer.

Cameras - New sensor for improved image quality

Photo with the front camera
Photo with the front camera

On paper, little seems to have changed in the cameras compared to the Nothing Phone (1). There are still two 50 megapixel lenses, but the manufacturer now installs a more modern Sony IMX 890 sensor in the main camera. The more powerful SoC also ensures that the camera functions more swiftly and can process photos faster.

Photos appear well-lit and full of realistic colors at first glance. However, the camera tends to omit details for more distant objects. The sensor takes sharp pictures in very low ambient light, but loses sharpness in very dark areas. The wide-angle lens, also 50 megapixels, takes decent pictures that can also be enlarged a little without much loss of detail. 

What is missing are real zoom capabilities as known from higher quality camera systems. There is no periscope camera on the Nothing Phone (2); the best on offer here is a hybrid zoom, which is possible for both the wide-angle and main camera.

Overall, the Nothing Phone (2) can take good photos, but what about videos? The smartphone is able to record in 4K at 60 fps. Both the autofocus and brightness adjustment respond very quickly and reliably. The resulting films are pleasing, especially in bright lighting conditions.

A 32-megapixel camera sits on the front. It takes detailed selfies, which you can also enlarge a little, but there could be more sharpness in dark areas.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera - flowerMain camera - surrounding environmentMain camera - low lightWide angle
click to load images

Under full studio lighting in the lab, the main camera takes pleasing photos whose sharpness drops only slightly towards the edges. We very much like the contrast and level of detail. At just 1 lux illumination, the image is still clearly recognizable, but dark areas hardly offer any definition.

ColorChecker
17.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (2): 10.1 ∆E min: 3.12 - max: 18.59 ∆E
ColorChecker
24.2 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
28.5 ∆E
30.5 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
24.2 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
26.6 ∆E
20 ∆E
26.7 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
25.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Nothing Phone (2): 24.35 ∆E min: 12.85 - max: 33.82 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty – Charger not included

A charger is not included with the Nothing Phone (2). Instead, only a USB cable and a SIM tool are found in the box. The charger can be purchased in Nothing's webstore, the price of which varies from region to region (EUR 35 in Germany, for example). A protective case is also available for purchase. 

The manufacturer offers a 24-month warranty for devices purchased in the EU. Of course, this may differ in other regions, so buyers should double check before purchasing. 

Input Devices & Operation - Fingerprint sensor behind the screen

Thanks to its 120 Hz display, the smartphone can be operated very smoothly. The touchscreen is sensitive right up to the corners and also responds to very light touches. The screen's query rate can be further increased via an experimental feature, so that the smartphone can cope with demanding touch frequent scenarios such as gaming. 

The fingerprint sensor is hidden behind the display, but is placed quite far down in portrait format so that you have to reach around to access it. It unlocks the smartphone almost immediately and recognizes stored fingerprints very reliably. Biometric unlocking via facial recognition is also possible, but only 2D images are used here, making this function susceptible to manipulation.

Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in portrait mode
Keyboard in landscape mode
Keyboard in landscape mode

Display - Bright and with DC dimming

Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix

The OLED screen in the Nothing Phone (2) is 6.7 inches, has a resolution of 2,412 x 1,080 pixels and can display up to 120 frames per second.

We really like the screen's maximum brightness, which Nothing specifies as 1,000 cd/m². We almost reached this value in our tests during full-screen playback, and even higher brightness levels are possible for HDR content in smaller screen sections.

The screen uses DC dimming to adjust the flickering to the refresh rate, so it should be less bothersome. Nevertheless, sensitive people should test the screen at low brightness before buying.

940
cd/m²
945
cd/m²
942
cd/m²
949
cd/m²
951
cd/m²
946
cd/m²
954
cd/m²
956
cd/m²
947
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 956 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 947.8 cd/m² Minimum: 2.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 951 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
98.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.203
Nothing Phone (2)
OLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Nothing Phone (1)
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
Xiaomi 12T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
OLED, 2652x1200, 6.78
OnePlus 10T
Fluid AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.70
Screen
-17%
-11%
-47%
-53%
Brightness middle
951
620
-35%
915
-4%
729
-23%
861
-9%
Brightness
948
625
-34%
914
-4%
719
-24%
856
-10%
Brightness Distribution
98
98
0%
98
0%
92
-6%
97
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.24
-24%
1.1
-10%
1.39
-39%
2.27
-127%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
2.31
-5%
2.7
-23%
4.74
-115%
4.17
-90%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.6
1.7
-6%
2
-25%
2.8
-75%
2.9
-81%
Gamma
2.203 100%
2.318 95%
2.24 98%
2.271 97%
2.303 96%
CCT
6516 100%
6325 103%
6457 101%
6738 96%
6141 106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 90 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 90 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 90 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Minimum brightness
Minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series at a fixed zoom level and different brightness settings

In our measurements with the sepctrophotometer and CalMAN software, the screen reproduces colors very accurately. For this, you should select the color profile "Standard" in the settings. You can then be sure that video content is portrayed exactly as the makers intended.

CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN sRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN AdobeRGB color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN DCI P3 color space
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.7 ms rise
↘ 0.7 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6 ms rise
↘ 0.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Outdoors, the OLED display shows what it can do - the brightness sensor reacts reliably and, if necessary, increases the brightness to such an extent that users can still view the display well, even on very sunny days.

The viewing angles also leave nothing to be desired.

Outdoor use
Outdoor use
Viewing angle stability
Viewing angle stability

Performance - High-end power in an affordable smartphone

Nothing uses a high-end SoC from 2022, namely the the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, which is no longer brand new. This keeps costs down whilst offering performance that is still high-end.

It ranks very highly among similarly priced smartphones in the benchmarks, sometimes by a significant margin. You get a very smooth system in everyday use along with sufficient performance reserves for multitasking or complex applications such as video editing or drone control.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (897 - 1389, n=23)
1280 Points +2%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1277 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1255 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=219, last 2 years)
913 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
907 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
824 Points -34%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
790 Points -37%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3782 - 4436, n=23)
4173 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4045 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
3987 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3720 Points -8%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
3023 Points -25%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2998 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=219, last 2 years)
2996 Points -26%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1719 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1530 - 1806, n=5)
1719 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=104, last 2 years)
1399 Points -19%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1008 Points -41%
Multi-Core
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4584 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (4140 - 4690, n=5)
4483 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=104, last 2 years)
3865 Points -16%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
2418 Points -47%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (782013 - 1119358, n=21)
997518 Points +7%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
932991 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
846323 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
778486 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (102602 - 1650926, n=153, last 2 years)
738503 Points -21%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
582264 Points -38%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
526944 Points -44%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
16612 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
15944 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (11029 - 17727, n=22)
14796 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
12684 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=214, last 2 years)
11787 Points -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
11662 Points -30%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10806 Points -35%
CrossMark - Overall
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1116 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (749 - 1178, n=21)
1033 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (200 - 1474, n=165, last 2 years)
837 Points -25%
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
806 Points -28%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
764 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
760 Points -32%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
711 Points -36%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8320 Points +6%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7839 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (5642 - 8753, n=21)
7507 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 11438, n=166, last 2 years)
5759 Points -27%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5393 Points -31%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4768 Points -39%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4610 Points -41%
System
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
12230 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12171 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (8750 - 13563, n=21)
11842 Points -3%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10424 Points -14%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
10281 Points -16%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10066 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2376 - 16475, n=166, last 2 years)
9672 Points -21%
Memory
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
8822 Points +4%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
8458 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3871 - 9114, n=21)
7549 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 12716, n=166, last 2 years)
6267 Points -26%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
5271 Points -38%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
4763 Points -44%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4662 Points -45%
Graphics
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
24037 Points +26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (16742 - 26660, n=21)
21295 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
19110 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 58651, n=166, last 2 years)
14220 Points -26%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10920 Points -43%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
8175 Points -57%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
6546 Points -66%
Web
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1919 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
1833 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (1198 - 2006, n=21)
1713 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1651 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2145, n=166, last 2 years)
1495 Points -22%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1274 Points -34%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
1273 Points -34%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (3291 - 84787, n=19)
47040 Points +241%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26371 Points +91%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=150, last 2 years)
21814 Points +58%
Nothing Phone (1)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G, Adreno 642L, 8192
20784 Points +51%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
19385 Points +40%
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
13807 Points
OnePlus 10T
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 16384
11648 Points -16%
AImark - Score v3.x
Nothing Phone (2)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
128240 Points
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G, Adreno 642L, 8192
43539 Points -66%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
  (887 - 128240, n=9)
29608 Points -77%
Average of class Smartphone
  (298 - 245629, n=105, last 2 years)
17833 Points -86%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
Points -100%

Our test device achieves 20 fps in the 4K benchmark of the GFXBench, so very high-resolution games are theoretically playable, but such games are few in the App Store. In FullHD the screen's native resolution, 60 fps, is achieved without issue.

In sum, the smartphone has a lot of power compared to similarly expensive phones.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2876 Points +13%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2538 Points
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
690 Points -73%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
686 Points -73%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2824 Points +3%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2754 Points
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -75%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
692 Points -75%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +88%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +72%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
435 fps +25%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
349 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps -22%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps -60%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -62%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps +78%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +23%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -2%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
221 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
211 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps -39%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -61%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -63%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps +22%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
171 fps +28%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -52%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -57%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +2%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -44%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -59%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +42%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -29%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -51%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -46%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -63%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +5%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -38%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -64%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -69%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -18%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -40%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -57%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +9%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -41%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -65%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
35 fps -69%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps 0%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -40%
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.7 fps -66%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5.9 fps -70%

Large websites load very quickly on the Nothing Phone (2) and pictures are usually available when scrolling smoothly. In the browser benchmarks the test device is in first place ahead of competing smartphones.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
178.548 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (76.2 - 178.5, n=21)
121.1 Points -32%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=173, last 2 years)
106.1 Points -41%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
81.383 Points -54%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
81.171 Points -55%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
74.88 Points -58%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
73.679 Points -59%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
162 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69.1 - 167, n=16)
111.4 runs/min -31%
Average of class Smartphone (14.9 - 445, n=157, last 2 years)
107.1 runs/min -34%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
93.4 runs/min -42%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
64.5 runs/min -60%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
56.6 runs/min -65%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chome 103)
53.71 runs/min -67%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
147 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (69 - 159, n=19)
111 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 202, n=160, last 2 years)
100.2 Points -32%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
79 Points -46%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
79 Points -46%
OnePlus 10T
75 Points -49%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
69 Points -53%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
204 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (106 - 224, n=14)
159.4 Points -22%
Average of class Smartphone (39 - 304, n=122, last 2 years)
133.1 Points -35%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
113 Points -45%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
109 Points -47%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
106 Points -48%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
102 Points -50%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
52931 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (17622 - 55611, n=22)
41373 Points -22%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
39982 Points -24%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
35255 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (4633 - 89112, n=213, last 2 years)
33503 Points -37%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
29489 Points -44%
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
24488 Points -54%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (1) (Chrome 103)
1796.1 ms * -138%
OnePlus 10T (Chrome 104)
1627.3 ms * -115%
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 9999, n=173, last 2 years)
1595 ms * -111%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
1446.8 ms * -92%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro (Huawei Browser 14)
1404.8 ms * -86%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (729 - 1707, n=20)
1047 ms * -39%
Nothing Phone (2) (Chrome 114)
755.5 ms *

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1 memory is often found in smartphones around US$750, but the memory controller in the Nothing Phone (2) also does its job very well. This results in short loading times and fast data transfers.

Nothing Phone (2)Nothing Phone (1)Xiaomi 12THuawei Nova 11 ProOnePlus 10TAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-22%
10%
-35%
-38%
-15%
-24%
Sequential Read 256KB
1949.5
1638
-16%
1834.32
-6%
1009.1
-48%
1568.37
-20%
1760 ?(1004 - 2037, n=87)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
1517.6
1351.9
-11%
1768.39
17%
809
-47%
847.69
-44%
1134 ?(452 - 1873, n=87)
-25%
Random Read 4KB
287.5
240.6
-16%
342.8
19%
229.8
-20%
173.45
-40%
Random Write 4KB
403.8
228.2
-43%
437.07
8%
303
-25%
211.24
-48%

Gaming - 60 fps is definitely possible

Although the Nothing Phone (2) is not a designated gaming phone, it still manages 60 fps in all tested games, even at high settings.

Since the frame rate is very stable, even more demanding gamers should be able to play on the smartphone. Just a pity that the maximum 120 Hz of the screen can hardly ever be utilized. The frame rate was measured using GameBench software.

Control via the touchscreen and the built-in position sensor worked perfectly in our tests.

PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
Diablo: Immortal
Diablo: Immortal
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.7.0: Ø59.7 (58-60)
Nothing Phone (2); PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.7.0: Ø59.3 (57-60)
Nothing Phone (2); Diablo Immortal; Medium Mobile Low; 2.0.2: Ø59.9 (59-60)
Nothing Phone (2); Diablo Immortal; Ultra Mobile Very High; 2.0.2: Ø59.7 (57-60)

Emissions - Heating and throttling

Temperature

We measured maximum case temperatures of 45.8 °C under prolonged load. This is clearly noticeable, but not critical. In everyday use, the temperatures will usually be lower, but prolonged gaming may certainly lead to noticeable increases in temperature.

The processor also throttles significantly under prolonged load and can sometimes only provide 60% of the initial performance after 20 benchmark runs.

Max. Load
 45.5 °C
114 F
42.7 °C
109 F
39.8 °C
104 F
 
 45.6 °C
114 F
43.4 °C
110 F
39.8 °C
104 F
 
 45.8 °C
114 F
43.2 °C
110 F
40.2 °C
104 F
 
Maximum: 45.8 °C = 114 F
Average: 42.9 °C = 109 F
35.4 °C
96 F
38.6 °C
101 F
41.4 °C
107 F
35.9 °C
97 F
38 °C
100 F
42.1 °C
108 F
34.9 °C
95 F
40 °C
104 F
41.8 °C
107 F
Maximum: 42.1 °C = 108 F
Average: 38.7 °C = 102 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 23.6 °C = 74 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.9 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.8 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.5 % +65%
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +64%
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92.7 % +54%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60.2 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (1)
Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +13%
Nothing Phone (2)
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87.3 %
OnePlus 10T
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
% -100%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø10.3 (10.2-11.6)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø4.12 (4.09-4.14)
Nothing Phone (2) Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (38.2-63.4)
Nothing Phone (1) Adreno 642L, SD 778G+ 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø15.3 (15.3-15.3)
Huawei Nova 11 Pro Adreno 642L, SD 778G 4G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.9 (14.8-15)
OnePlus 10T Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø61.8 (59-63.6)
Thermal imaging - front
Thermal imaging - front
Thermal imaging - back
Thermal imaging - back

Speakers

The earpiece is used as a second speaker on the Nothing Phone (2) so that slight stereo effects are possible when positioned correctly and the overall sound is a little stronger. The speakers get moderately loud and reproduce music quite clearly.

However, the smartphone still sounds somewhat treble-heavy, which is why real audio enthusiasts are probably better off using headphones or external speakers. Almost everything you could wish for is available in terms of wireless audio codecs, ranging from SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC up to V5.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs204036.12535.933.73133.5284034.532.15036.533.96327.526.78020.319.410020.321.212520.632.116022.337.220017.936.525013.842.231515.149.140012.555.750011.958.663011.661.980014.467.5100014.370.2125012.472.7160010.473.8200010.672.125001171.5315011.569.8400012.265.1500012.962.4630013.567.8800014.370100001571.81250015.764.91600016.647.1SPL25.281.9N0.749.7median 13.8median 64.9Delta2.111.240.435.640.537.427.335.231.830.540.636.625.229.121.318.118.922.516.831.520.241.51647.818.253.51456.61358.117.262.517.962.219.563.919.570.622.274.721.177.425.974.919.973.915.172.814.7711565.214.859.813.86514.965.914.758.815.455.331.731.7841.31.352.9median 16.8median 62.2median 68.42.39.315.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNothing Phone (2)OnePlus 10T
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nothing Phone (2) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 10T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 68.4% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (124.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 93% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 98% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Life - Quite enduring in everyday use

Power Consumption

The power consumption of the Nothing Phone (2) is quite good under no or low load, but then increases sharply and is very high under maximum load.

If you have to plug the smartphone in, you can charge at up to 45 watts, but a suitable charger is not included. In our test lab the smartphone accepts most chargers without issue and fully recharges in a maximum of 1:30 hours at full charging capacity. Wireless charging is possible at up to 15 watts and reverse charging from other devices at 5 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.9 / 1.1 / 1.4 Watt
Load midlight 5 / 10.4 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.
Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12T
5000 mAh
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
4%
-19%
16%
-25%
-8%
Idle Minimum *
0.9
1
-11%
1.38
-53%
0.8
11%
1.015 ?(0.56 - 2.57, n=19)
-13%
Idle Average *
1.1
1.2
-9%
1.83
-66%
1.2
-9%
1.869 ?(0.71 - 8.65, n=19)
-70%
Idle Maximum *
1.4
1.5
-7%
1.9
-36%
1.3
7%
2.02 ?(0.79 - 8.71, n=19)
-44%
Load Average *
5
4.2
16%
3.23
35%
3.5
30%
5.69 ?(2.75 - 15, n=19)
-14%
Load Maximum *
10.4
7.4
29%
7.71
26%
5.9
43%
8.55 ?(4.54 - 15, n=19)
18%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.53 (0.873-10.8)
Nothing Phone (2); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.994 (0.902-1.14)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Nothing Phone (2); 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.7 (10.3-11.2)
Nothing Phone (2); Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.994 (0.902-1.14)

Battery Life

The Nothing Phone (2) has a 4,700 mAh strong battery, which ensures solid runtimes of up to 15:09 hours in our Wi-Fi test. A Xiaomi 12T lasts considerably longer and the Nothing Phone (1) can also surf the web for a few minutes longer, but the runtimes of the Phone (2) should easily suffice for everyday use.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
29h 04min
WiFi Websurfing
15h 9min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
20h 45min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 28min
Nothing Phone (2)
4700 mAh
Nothing Phone (1)
4500 mAh
Xiaomi 12T
5000 mAh
Huawei Nova 11 Pro
4500 mAh
OnePlus 10T
4800 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-6%
-24%
13%
Reader / Idle
1744
1813
4%
1578
-10%
1795
3%
H.264
1245
1059
-15%
1027
-18%
1646
32%
WiFi v1.3
909
926
2%
984
8%
689
-24%
856
-6%
Load
268
259
-3%
256
-4%
332
24%

Pros

+ lots of power
+ reasonably priced
+ chic design
+ good photo quality
+ long battery runtimes
+ gaming at 60 fps
+ bright and true-color screen
+ wireless charging
+ very accurate navigation

Cons

- no charger included
- no eSIM support
- USB 2.0 port only
- significant throttling under load

Verdict - Unusually good value

In review: Nothing Phone (2). Test device provided by Nothing Germany.
In review: Nothing Phone (2). Test device provided by Nothing Germany.

The cheapest version of the Nothing Phone (2) is already available for US$749, which is definitely a good price for a smartphone with a high-end SoC. After all, it also has good battery life, an almost 1,000 cd/m² bright OLED screen with DC dimming and very good color reproduction, as well as fast charging technology and wireless charging.

The operating system can also be run without the manufacturer's design and is slated to receive security updates for 4 years. The many cell phone frequencies mean that the smartphone can be used globally, and the cameras take good photos. The quality doesn't quite match that of high-end cameras and optical zoom is missing, but if you just want to take sharp pictures with natural colors, the Nothing Phone (2) is a good choice.

The translucent design remains eye-catching and the glyph interface is a nice gimmick that keeps finding more and more uses.

You may find it useful or unnecessary that Nothing doesn't include a charger, but the lack of eSIM support is definitely annoying. The lame USB 2.0 port, which prevents the forwarding of video via port, shouldn't be in a high-end smartphone either.

The Nothing Phone (2) is fast and convinces with its unusual design and high-end features at a reasonable price.

If mid-range performance suffices for you and if you like the Glyph interface, you can pay US$405 for the Nothing Phone (1) via Amazon USA. The OnePlus 10T is also very fast and available at cheap prices.

Price and Availability

Of the three storage configurations of the Nothing Phone (2), only the 256 GB and 512 GB variants appear to be available at Amazon USA. The former (256 GB) is priced at $749.00 in Dark Grey and White, while the latter (512 GB) is selling for $859.00, also in Dark Grey and White.

Amazon India, for its part, also has exactly the same storage configurations on offer as Amazon USA: 256GB (Dark Grey and White) for ₹54,999, 512 GB (Dark Grey and White) for ₹59,999.

Nothing Phone (2) - 07/26/2023 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
51 / 70 → 73%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
66 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
88 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
75 / 90 → 83%
Camera
72%
Average
81%
87%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

Read all 9 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Nothing Phone (2) review: LED effects in a fairly priced high-end smartphone
Florian Schmitt, 2023-07-28 (Update: 2023-07-28)