Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi 12T 5G review - Top of the range smartphone at an attractive price

Successfully fine-tuned. In our review, the Xiaomi 12T attempts to turn heads with its newer SoC, a redesigned triple-camera system. Similar to the pro model, it can also be charged with up to 120 watts - and all without greatly affecting the price. Read on as our review uncovers whether these improvements warrant a switch from your current handset.

The Xiaomi 12T 5G follows the Xiaomi 11T and is the smaller sibling of the 12T Pro 5G. The basic details read very similarly to those of its predecessor. Both devices opt for a 6.67-inch large AMOLED display with up to 120 Hz. Additionally, they have 8 GB of RAM at their disposal and come with a choice of either 128 or 256 GB internal memory. The heart of the triple-camera is a 108 MPix sensor and both devices are poweréd by 5000 mAh batteries.

The Xiaomi 12T 5G uses a newer and more powerful MediaTek-SoC. Although the amount of RAM is identical, in LPDDR5 the 12T possesses a more modern standard. The fast-charging technology has received a substantial upgrade which now supports up to 120 watts. However, regarding the camera, our review demonstrates that just because something is newer it doesn't automatically make it better. 

In terms of price, the Xiaomi smartphone starts with an RRP of around 490 US dollars for the smaller storage version, with the 256 GB model coming in at an additional 40 dollars.  

Xiaomi 12T (12T Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive, touch sampling rate: up to 480 Hz, AMOLED, AdaptiveSync display: 30 Hz, 60 Hz, 90 Hz, 120 Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, accelerometer, electronic compass, gyroscope, linear motor, flicker sensor, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.1 x 75.9 ( = 0.34 x 6.42 x 2.99 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 120W wired turbo charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung Iscocell HM6, 1/1.67", 0.64 µm, f/1.7, OIS) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 120 °) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); 4k-video; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.24, 1080p video up to 60 FPS)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: On-screen, UBS-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, 120W charger, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Body SAR: 0.992 W/kg, Head SAR: 0.989 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), SBAS; DRM Widevine L1; Bluetooth Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V4, fanless
Weight
202 g ( = 7.13 oz / 0.45 pounds), Power Supply: 227 g ( = 8.01 oz / 0.5 pounds)
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors compared

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
86.4 %
01/2023
Xiaomi 12T
Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6
202 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86.6 %
10/2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9
203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88.5 %
11/2022
Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7
197 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2400x1080
89.3 %
05/2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
87.4 %
10/2022
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660
172 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.4 %
03/2022
realme GT 2 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440

Case - Xiaomi 12T only with Gorilla Glass 5

All 12T color variations (image: Xiaomi)
Color variations

The Xiaomi 12T 5G is available in three color variants: blue, black, and silver, the color of our test device. Xiaomi has stayed true to its predecessor's basic design with only the camera set-up having received an optical makeover but continuing to jut out. 

The smartphone has made a backward step concerning the glass front panel with the implementation of the older Corning Gorilla Glas 5 rather than the current Vitus type used in the 11T. The rear panel now comes with matte glass which is curved at the sides and is otherwise not specified by Xiaomi. A very stylish look but fingerprints remain clearly visible.

The device impresses with its high-quality finish. The partially matte aluminum frame has a premium look and despite its heavy weight, the 12T 5G feels good in the hand, due to the rear panel's curved sides. The side buttons can be easily reached with only left-handers requiring a slight grip readjustment to increase the volume.  Although gaps are tight and even, the device creaks considerably when twisted.

The SIM slot closes flush to the frame and possesses a small rubber seal on the inside. However, the Xiaomi 12T 5G offers nothing in the way of certified dust or water protection.  

Size comparison

164.1 mm / 6.46 inch 76.9 mm / 3.03 inch 8.8 mm / 0.3465 inch 203 g0.4475 lbs163.1 mm / 6.42 inch 75.9 mm / 2.99 inch 8.6 mm / 0.3386 inch 202 g0.4453 lbs163.2 mm / 6.43 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.2 mm / 0.3228 inch 189 g0.4167 lbs158.48 mm / 6.24 inch 71.99 mm / 2.83 inch 7.45 mm / 0.2933 inch 172 g0.3792 lbs155.6 mm / 6.13 inch 73.2 mm / 2.88 inch 8.7 mm / 0.3425 inch 197 g0.4343 lbs146 mm / 5.75 inch 70.6 mm / 2.78 inch 7.6 mm / 0.2992 inch 167 g0.3682 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Xiaomi smartphone with USB 2.0

The Xiaomi 12T 5G has a USB-2.0 port, which supports OTG and enables the connection of peripherals and storage media. Memory expansion via a microSD card is not possible.

As with very few smartphones in this price category, the 12T also comes without a radio receiver or an integrated audio jack. Anyone wishing to use wired headphones can only do so with the help of a USB adapter. However, an IR blaster is still on board and can be used to control multimedia devices, cameras, and air conditioning systems. In addition to NFC, the device also comes with modern Bluetooth 5.3.

Top: Speaker, microphone, infrared
Top: Speaker, microphone, infrared
Left
Left
Right: volume buttons, power
Right: volume buttons, power
Bottom: speaker, microphone, USB, SIM
Bottom: speaker, microphone, USB, SIM

Software - The Xiaomi 12T will get Android 15

The Xiaomi 12T 5G is shipped with Android 12 and MIUI 13. The manufacturer has promised three big Android updates for the 12T series ensuring the 12T will also receive Android 15 and security patches continuing for another year. However, the update intervals are relatively large as our test device was still on MIUI 13.0.10 from November 1, 2022, at the conclusion of our test. Xiaomi is most likely aiming for quarterly updates.

Typically for MIUI, the system is very restrictive when it comes to energy management. For anyone wishing to ensure that push notifications from important apps are always received, the appropriate restrictions should be lifted in each app's settings.   

Communication and GNSS - Stable WiFi 6 and good GPS tracking

The Xiaomi 12T 5G boasts similar communication features to that of its predecessor apart from the newer Bluetooth standard. The smartphone supports WiFi 6 but not yet 6E and can therefore only use the 2.4 and 5.0 GHz bands. The transfer speeds to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router and high and very stable. 

On the go, the 12T connects the network with 5G-Sub6 and offers a decent frequency range which should not result in any connection bottlenecks within Europe.

Networking
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
888 (min: 833) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 965) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
884 (min: 817) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
836 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1716 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1757 (min: 1694) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
763 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼84%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
775 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
844 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1670 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
800 (min: 597) MBit/s ∼46%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
862 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
933 (min: 826) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
603 (min: 44.3) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
651 (min: 57.7) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1515 (min: 853) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1331 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AX12
515 (min: 16.9) MBit/s ∼58%
iperf3 receive AX12
486 (min: 31.1) MBit/s ∼58%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø886 (833-922)
realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø862 (780-919)
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø982 (965-1014)
realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (826-963)
GPS test: indoors
Indoors
GPS test: outdoors
Outdoors
GPS test: available GNSS
GNSS

The Xiaomi 12T 5G supports all global satellite networks and their associated frequency bands; including the Indian NavIC as well as SBAS. Outdoors, the Satfix took place swiftly and accurately whereby indoors it can take up to half a minute but with almost similar precision. 

On a bike tour, we put the Xiaomi smartphone head-to-head with the Garmin Venu 2. The recorded total distance of nearly ten kilometers deviated by only 20 meters. The detailed route plan revealed a few inaccuracies on the part of the 12T but still managed convincing location performance.  

GNSS test drive: lake tour
GNSS test drive: lake tour
GNSS test drive: turning point
GNSS test drive: turning point
GNSS test drive: summary
GNSS test drive: summary

Phone functions and call quality

The Xiaomi 12T 5G supports Dual-SIM with two Nano SIM cards, VoLTE, and WiFi calls. However, the device doesn't integrate SIP accounts and also third-party apps may have to be used instead.

When held to the ear, the smartphone's call quality is good but noise cancellation is only sufficient for quieter environmental noise with the device soon reaching its limits on busy streets or amongst large gatherings of people. The speaker mode does its job adequately, only reverberates slightly, and has a usable microphone range.  

Cameras - Xiaomi smartphone with weak additional lenses

Selfie with the Xiaomi 12T 5G
Selfie with the Xiaomi 12T 5G

In terms of resolution, the front-facing camera has increased slightly with 20 MPix at its disposal but only using it for pixel-binning. Unfortunately, these many pixels are not reflected in inordinately good image quality. Even though the imaging performance is rock solid and details are missing in places, generally we liked the cooler reproduction. At best, videos are recorded in Full HD at 60fps.

At the technological heart is a 108 MPix photo sensor: the Samsung ISOCELL HM6. This is a little smaller than the HM2 in the 11T, which is also reflected in smaller pixels. In contrast, Samsung has increased the autofocus pixel density to be able to capture moving objects better.  Using pixel binning, nine neighboring pixels are combined into one super pixel helping improve low-light performance. During testing, the imaging performance was impressive and delivered appealing results. The AI doesn't overly sharpen images and colors are not over-saturated. In dark scenes, the subject is captured properly but certain areas appear muddy and pixelated.

Both of the triple camera's additional lenses consist of an ultra-wide-angle lens as well as a macro lens. The latter still had 5 MPix in the 11T and now has to make do with 2 MPix. The ultra-wide-angle lens does its job well and is a little short on detail, but the macro is quite simply poor.

At best, the Xiaomi 12T 5G records videos in Ultra HD (maximum 30fps). With this sensor, theoretically, 8K at 24fps or 4K at up to 120fps ought to be possible. However, the SoC's ISP seems to be the limiting factor here. 

Macro shots with the Xiaomi 12T

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
click to load images

Color reproduction is more saturated under controlled lighting conditions. In particular, the red and green tone's DeltaE is considerably higher than 10. 

The Xiaomi 12T displays an accurate representation of the test chart. Only at full magnification does it become noticeable that a few details are lost, even in the center of the image. However, this effect increases only slightly towards the edge of the image. 

ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12T: 8.02 ∆E min: 0.66 - max: 17.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12T: 47.4 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.94 ∆E

Accessories and guarantee - Now including a 120W charger

The Xiaomi 12T 5G only comes with a one-year guarantee that cannot be extended. The guarantee obligation remains unaffected by this.

For a 2022 smartphone, the device comes packed with an extensive range of extras. These include a modular 120-watt charger, a USB cable (type-A to type-C), a SIM tool, a transparent silicon protective case as well as the usual paperwork in several languages. Unlike last year, an audio jack adapter is not included.  

Input devices & operation - Touchscreen with a high sampling rate

The Xiaomi 12T 5G's capacitive touchscreen has a sampling rate of up to 480 Hz and can recognize up to ten touches at the same time. The display already comes with a factory-fitted screen protector. The display is smooth and responsive and input responds quickly and precisely.

An integrated in-display fingerprint sensor takes care of biometric security, delivering reliable recognition rates and unlocking the phone quickly. Alternatively or additionally, less secure facial recognition can be set up via the front-facing camera.

The vibration motor runs quietly and provides good haptic feedback. 

The Xiaomi 12T 5G has a bright, 120 Hz OLED

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

In terms of the display, no compromises have had to be made compared to the Xiaomi 12T Pro, as they are identical in construction. The 6.67-inch AMOLED panel employs an unusual resolution but offers higher pixel density. In addition, the Xiaomi smartphone supports the most common HDR standards, with only Dolby Vision missing.

With the activated ambient light sensor, brightness is very high with a pure white display and manages to reach an average of 914 cd/m². With an even distribution of light and dark areas, (APL18) this value climbs to 1118 cd/m². For anyone only wishing to regulate the brightness manually, 502 cd/m² are available.

OLED flickering isn't particularly noticeable as the 12T operates with a constant DC dimming mode over the entire brightness range. With the oscilloscope, we were only able to measure consistent flickering at the display refresh rate. A time-lapse look through the microscope revealed that no temporal dithering is used.

912
cd/m²
904
cd/m²
923
cd/m²
910
cd/m²
915
cd/m²
927
cd/m²
904
cd/m²
911
cd/m²
920
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 927 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 914 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 915 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.2
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.5
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi 12T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.30
Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.10
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.55
realme GT 2 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.70
Screen
-23%
3%
-17%
-2%
-85%
Brightness middle
915
781
-15%
936
2%
853
-7%
954
4%
740
-19%
Brightness
914
782
-14%
947
4%
858
-6%
961
5%
732
-20%
Brightness Distribution
98
94
-4%
95
-3%
96
-2%
98
0%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
2
-82%
1.3
-18%
1.9
-73%
1.5
-36%
3.25
-195%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.9
-7%
2.7
-0%
3.2
-19%
2.5
7%
6.46
-139%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
2.3
-15%
1.4
30%
1.9
5%
1.8
10%
4.7
-135%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
2.24 98%
2.213 99%
CCT
6457 101%
6852 95%
6664 98%
6460 101%
6254 104%
5663 115%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 19442 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

Minimum display brightness
Min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
Maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurements with fixed zoom and various brightness settings

Colors are represented very naturally on the Xiaomi 12T 5G's display as long as the color scheme Original Colors is applied. On first start-up, the phone is set to Vivid which is visibly cooler and uses the larger DCI-P3 color space. 

Grayscale (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Colors (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Color space (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)
Saturation (color scheme: original colors, color temperature: standard, target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4525 ms rise
↘ 0.4375 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.4 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (22.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5915 ms rise
↘ 0.6085 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.25 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (35.8 ms).

Outdoors, the Xiaomi 12T 5G possesses enough brightness reserves to remain legible at all times. Only the surface reflections could sometimes be a bit annoying.   

As expected, the AMOLED display's viewing angle is very good. Only at narrow viewing angles, a slight green veil covers the content and the brightness decreases a little. However, this is not disruptive in everyday use. 

Xiaomi 12T 5G viewing angle stability
Xiaomi 12T 5G viewing angle stability

Performance - Xiaomi 12T with the MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Ultra

The Xiaomi 12T 5G is powered by a MediaTek Dimensity 8100 Ultra with 8 GB of RAM. However, the Ultra monicker appears to be only a marketing term. At least in terms of the specifications, no differences to the standard model could be found, and neither did benchmarks reveal any significant differences.

The SoC showed good CPU performance in benchmarks, which underlines the smartphone's premium class claims. However, in PCMark und AnTuTu, the 12T performs a little worse than the Poco X4 GT, which is likewise equipped with a Dimensity 8100, but, in everyday use, it delivers smooth system performance 

Geekbench 5.4
Single-Core
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1267 Points ∼100% +40%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1158 Points ∼91% +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points ∼90% +26%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points ∼83% +16%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
971 Points ∼77% +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (887 - 971, n=3)
922 Points ∼73% +2%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
907 Points ∼72%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
887 Points ∼70% -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points ∼68% -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1885, n=261, last 2 years)
769 Points ∼61% -15%
Multi-Core
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
4012 Points ∼100% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (3701 - 4012, n=3)
3811 Points ∼95% +2%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3720 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3701 Points ∼92% -1%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3641 Points ∼91% -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3544 Points ∼88% -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points ∼87% -7%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points ∼81% -12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points ∼73% -22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (291 - 5538, n=261, last 2 years)
2472 Points ∼62% -34%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
965911 Points ∼100% +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
829929 Points ∼86% +7%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
819433 Points ∼85% +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points ∼84% +5%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
809368 Points ∼84% +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (778486 - 819433, n=3)
802429 Points ∼83% +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
778486 Points ∼81%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points ∼80% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (111952 - 1300282, n=164, last 2 years)
600849 Points ∼62% -23%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points ∼59% -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
14650 Points ∼100% +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points ∼96% +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (12684 - 14650, n=3)
13463 Points ∼92% +6%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
13056 Points ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
12684 Points ∼87%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12279 Points ∼84% -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12136 Points ∼83% -4%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points ∼83% -4%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points ∼72% -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4436 - 19200, n=223, last 2 years)
10352 Points ∼71% -18%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points ∼100% +25%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points ∼94% +18%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
850 Points ∼89% +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
828 Points ∼87% +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (764 - 850, n=3)
801 Points ∼84% +5%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
789 Points ∼82% +3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (226 - 1332, n=101, last 2 years)
786 Points ∼82% +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
764 Points ∼80%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
612 Points ∼64% -20%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7147 Points ∼100% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points ∼98% +30%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6382 Points ∼89% +18%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points ∼87% +16%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6157 Points ∼86% +14%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6015 Points ∼84% +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (5393 - 6157, n=3)
5855 Points ∼82% +9%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5393 Points ∼75%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points ∼74% -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (411 - 9555, n=173, last 2 years)
4835 Points ∼68% -10%
System
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11897 Points ∼100% +18%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
11696 Points ∼98% +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (10066 - 11897, n=3)
11220 Points ∼94% +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points ∼94% +11%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10247 Points ∼86% +2%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10066 Points ∼85%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9864 Points ∼83% -2%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points ∼81% -5%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points ∼78% -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2083 - 19657, n=173, last 2 years)
8474 Points ∼71% -16%
Memory
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points ∼100% +53%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6569 Points ∼92% +41%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points ∼90% +38%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6356 Points ∼89% +36%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6162 Points ∼86% +32%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6016 Points ∼84% +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (4662 - 6356, n=3)
5678 Points ∼79% +22%
Average of class Smartphone
  (670 - 11617, n=173, last 2 years)
5398 Points ∼76% +16%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points ∼75% +16%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4662 Points ∼65%
Graphics
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21885 Points ∼100% +100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points ∼79% +58%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points ∼73% +47%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14811 Points ∼68% +36%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11595 Points ∼53% +6%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10920 Points ∼50%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (10106 - 11595, n=3)
10874 Points ∼50% 0%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
10106 Points ∼46% -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (697 - 27384, n=173, last 2 years)
9656 Points ∼44% -12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points ∼34% -31%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points ∼100% +17%
realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1888 Points ∼98% +14%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points ∼96% +11%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
1742 Points ∼91% +6%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1732 Points ∼90% +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1728 Points ∼90% +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (1651 - 1742, n=3)
1708 Points ∼89% +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1651 Points ∼86%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points ∼83% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2392, n=173, last 2 years)
1431 Points ∼74% -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference - Overall Score
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points ∼100% +61%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
32339 Points ∼76% +23%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
27192 Points ∼64% +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (25609 - 27192, n=3)
26391 Points ∼62% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26371 Points ∼62%
realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
25609 Points ∼60% -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (207 - 84787, n=100, last 2 years)
23472 Points ∼55% -11%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21846 Points ∼51% -17%

Graphics calculations are handled by the SoC-integrated ARM Mali-G610 MP6. In benchmarks, this means a performance increase of between 10 and 46 percent compared to the Mali-G77 MP9 found in the 11T. Unfortunately, the 3DMark Wild Life (Extreme) scores are missing as the 12T's system didn't grant the app the necessary rights.   

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5040 Points ∼100% +7%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5017 Points ∼100% +6%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4971 Points ∼99% +5%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4716 Points ∼94%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points ∼81% -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points ∼79% -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points ∼100% +22%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points ∼97% +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10930 Points ∼92% +12%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9929 Points ∼83% +2%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9738 Points ∼82%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8353 Points ∼70% -14%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8677 Points ∼100% +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points ∼95% +5%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points ∼94% +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8155 Points ∼94% +4%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7875 Points ∼91%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7256 Points ∼84% -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps ∼100% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼99% -1%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps ∼97% -3%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼75% -25%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼50% -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps ∼100% +40%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps ∼79% +11%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
274 fps ∼72% +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
272 fps ∼72% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps ∼71%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps ∼66% -8%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
185 fps ∼49% -32%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps ∼100% +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps ∼94% +11%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps ∼88% +5%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps ∼84%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps ∼83% -1%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps ∼71% -16%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼47% -44%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼47% -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
194 fps ∼100% +50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps ∼99% +50%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps ∼87% +31%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps ∼73% +9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps ∼69% +4%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps ∼68% +2%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps ∼66%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps ∼63% -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps ∼100% +55%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps ∼83% +29%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼79% +22%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps ∼78% +21%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps ∼66% +3%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps ∼65%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼53% -18%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼53% -18%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
143 fps ∼100% +51%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps ∼86% +29%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps ∼76% +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps ∼66% 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps ∼66% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps ∼66%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps ∼62% -6%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps ∼55% -17%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼100% +55%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps ∼97% +50%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼85% +33%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼85% +33%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼77% +20%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps ∼71% +10%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼68% +5%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps ∼65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps ∼100% +59%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼79% +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼78% +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps ∼72% +15%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼69% +9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps ∼64% +2%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps ∼63%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps ∼53% -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps ∼100% +59%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps ∼94% +50%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps ∼82% +31%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps ∼76% +22%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps ∼73% +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps ∼71% +13%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼65% +3%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps ∼63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps ∼100% +58%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps ∼80% +27%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps ∼71% +12%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps ∼66% +4%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps ∼63%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps ∼59% -8%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps ∼51% -19%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps ∼29% -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps ∼100% +35%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼98% +33%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps ∼89% +20%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps ∼88% +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps ∼86% +16%
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼80% +8%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼74% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps ∼74%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps ∼100% +49%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps ∼71% +6%
realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps ∼69% +3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps ∼68% +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼67% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps ∼67%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps ∼65% -3%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps ∼53% -21%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps ∼100% +17%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps ∼86% 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps ∼86%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps ∼79% -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10906 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10331 Points ∼95%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10206 Points ∼94%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10117 Points ∼93%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8041 Points ∼74%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17842 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15730 Points ∼88%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15555 Points ∼87%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13699 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11770 Points ∼66%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5283 Points ∼100%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5260 Points ∼100%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4749 Points ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points ∼77%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3813 Points ∼72%