Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G review - The powerful entry-level smartphone with a big price advantage

Is a purchase a no-brainer?

Xiaomi's new entry-level phone, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G, can already be had for as low as $250. For this price, you get a lot of smartphone, including a 120-Hz AMOLED display and other almost premium-worthy features. In this review, you'll also find out where Xiaomi has cut corners.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Daisy Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict on the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G offers a lot for an entry-level smartphone. This starts with its bright 120-Hz AMOLED display and continues with its solid main camera and impressive connectivity, including 5G, NFC, an IR blaster, and storage expansion via a microSD card. Its lightweight, high-quality and IP64-certified case is also a highlight.

Xiaomi wants around $300 for its smartphone but at the time of writing, you can already get it for $250, and the trend continues to fall sharply. You can confidently purchase the Redmi Note 14 5G for this price, as not many competitors offer such a good overall package. However, we would have liked to have seen a power supply included as well as longer software support for the phone—curiously, you only get both with the even cheaper Redmi Note 14 LTE.

Pros

+ 120-Hz AMOLED display
+ lightweight and high-quality case
+ IP64 certification
+ storage can be expanded
+ 3.5-mm jack
+ updates until 2029

Cons

- little performance in reserve
- only 2 OS upgrades
- no power supply included with phone
- no fully-fledged always-on display
- average runtimes
- ads in apps

Price and availability

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G is currently available to purchase on Amazon for around $255.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
75.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 ⎘
IMG BXM-8-256 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $7.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
3. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
190 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
2.
77.3%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $8.99
NECARSIN 3 Pack for Motorola...
3. $7.80
Zeking [2 Pack for Motorola ...
List Price: 499€
171 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"
2670x1220
459 PPI
P-OLED
3.
86.9% v7 (old)
Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
2. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
3. $11.99
Foluu Clear Case for Nothing...
List Price: 329€
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1084
394 PPI
AMOLED
4.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $4.49
for Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Ca...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
5.
77.7%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $8.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $3.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
3. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
185.5 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
6.
75.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $249.99
List Price: 212 Euro
174.5 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

Anyone looking for affordable smartphones from Xiaomi will find what they are looking for in its Redmi series. There are currently five different models available, of which we have already taken a closer look at the Redmi Note 14 LTE, the Redmi Note 14 Pro, the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G and the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G.

Now comes our review of the remaining Redmi model: The Redmi Note 14 5G officially costs around $300 and is only available in a version with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB storage. As the product name suggests, the Redmi Note 14 5G comes with a 5G module, unlike the Redmi Note 14 LTE. It also uses slightly more powerful hardware than the entry-level model.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 8 x 2 - 2.5 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4X
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 240 Hz touch sampling rate, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, 960 Hz PWM dimming, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 220 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm headset jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (exFAT support), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Virtual proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, Wi-Fi Direct
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (Band 850/900/1800/1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/13/17/18/19/20/26/28/32/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.99 x 162.4 x 75.7 ( = 0.31 x 6.39 x 2.98 in)
Battery
5110 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 45W max. charging speed
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (f/1.7, 1/1.67", OIS) + 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2) + 2MP macro (f/2.4), video recording up to 1080@30fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.2, 1/4.0"), video recording up to 1080@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos support, Keyboard: virtual, USB Type-C Cable, SIM Eject Tool, Protective Case, Quick Start Guide, Warranty Card, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, HDR support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG; Head SAR 0.990 W/kg, Body SAR 0.996 W/kg; IP64 rating, fanless
Weight
190 g ( = 6.7 oz / 0.42 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The lightweight smartphone with slim bezels

In terms of its design, the Redmi Note 14 5G has adopted a lot from its predecessor and also features a slim and lightweight plastic case with narrower display edges. Subtly rounded corners and edges, a weight of 190 grams and good build quality ensure that the smartphone feels nice to touch and comfortable to use.

There are three matte color variants to choose from, namely Midnight Black, Lavender Purple and Coral Green. Our test device is the latter. In the black version, the back cover is uniformly black, while in Lavender Purple and Coral Green it is decorated with a four-part pattern. All four surfaces reflect light a little differently and glitter slightly.

Its frame is made of an aluminum alloy in the same color as its case, while the phone's display is protected by Gorilla Glass 5. There is a protective film installed on its screen ex works. The smartphone also offers protection against dust and splashes of water in accordance with IP64.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Xiaomi)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Xiaomi)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (image source: Xiaomi)

Size comparison

162.33 mm / 6.39 in 74.42 mm / 2.93 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 185.5 g0.409 lbs162.4 mm / 6.39 in 75.7 mm / 2.98 in 7.99 mm / 0.3146 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.74 mm / 6.37 in 76.32 mm / 3 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 209 g0.4608 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 7.6 mm / 0.2992 in 174.5 g0.3847 lbs154.1 mm / 6.07 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 171 g0.377 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Connectivity - The Redmi Note 14 5G with an IR blaster and a headphone jack

The Redmi Note 14 5G relies on 8 GB of LPDDR4X RAM and 256 GB of UFS 2.2 storage, which is a decent standard. In some regions, the smartphone is also available with up to 12 GB RAM and 512 GB storage.

Features such as an IR blaster, stereo speakers and a 3.5-mm jack all go beyond the norm for a smartphone of this price. Its hybrid SIM slot fits either two nano SIM cards or one SIM card and one microSD card, which can be up to 1 TB in size.

There are no surprises when it comes to its USB-C port, as it runs at USB 2.0 speed. In our copying test using the Samsung 980 Pro SSD, it achieved a data throughput of 24.1 MB/s.

Left: no connections (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Left: no connections (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Right: volume rocker, power button (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Right: volume rocker, power button (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Top: 3.5-mm headphone jack, speaker, IR blaster, microphone (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Top: 3.5-mm headphone jack, speaker, IR blaster, microphone (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Bottom: speaker, microphone, USB-C 2.0, SIM/microSD slot (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Bottom: speaker, microphone, USB-C 2.0, SIM/microSD slot (image source: Manuel Masiero)

microSD card reader

With our Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD reference card inserted, the Redmi Note 14 5G didn't quite achieve the microSD data throughput rates of its predecessor, but it managed more stable transfer rates than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 (Angelbird AV Pro microSD 128 GB V60)
36.2 MB/s +20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years)
30.6 MB/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
30.1 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø38 (29.1-47.4)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø39.8 (25.4-57.9)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.7 (43.2-79.3)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø71.4 (38.1-99.5)

Software - Only 2 OS upgrades for the Redmi Note 14 5G

Xiaomi delivers its Redmi Note 14 5G with HyperOS 1.0 based on Android 14, and the manufacturer aims to provide it with Android security updates until January 2029. At the time of testing at the end of February, its latest Android security patch was from January 1, 2025.

Allegedly, Xiaomi only wants to provide 2 OS upgrades for its Redmi Note 14 5G. Interestingly, it seems to be giving the Redmi Note 14 LTE blatant preferential treatment, as support for the cheapest Redmi model doesn't end until March 2031. 4 OS upgrades are also planned here.

In addition to Google and Xiaomi apps, HyperOS also includes some bloatware from third-party providers such as TikTok, Facebook and Booking. However, all these programs can be easily uninstalled.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G

Sustainability

Xiaomi hasn't provided any information on the Redmi Note 14 5G's CO2 footprint. Nevertheless, the device comes in virtually plastic-free packaging and the manufacturer promises a long service life for its smartphone.

On the one hand, this is achieved through protective measures such as an energy-absorbing foam and internal four-corner reinforcement to protect the phone from drop damage. Secondly, its battery is said to still retain over 80 percent of its initial capacity even after four years of use or 1,600 charging cycles, according to Xiaomi.

Communication and GNSS - WiFi 5 and GPS fit for everyday use

The Redmi Note 14 5G doesn't break any speed records with its WiFi 5 module. However, when connected to our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router, data transfers were stable and reached a peak of around 370 MBit/s. Competitors such as the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G and the Motorola Edge 50 Neo show that you can expect significantly faster Wi-Fi even in this price range.

When it comes to communication technology, the Redmi Note 14 5G features an NFC module and a 5G module, coming ahead of its cheaper sister model, the Redmi Note 14 LTE. It recognizes all the important 5G bands in the DACH region (where this test was carried out), such as bands 1, 3, 28, 77 and 78.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +124%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
762 (640min - 836max) MBit/s +104%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=185, last 2 years)
728 MBit/s +95%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s +82%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
398 (193min - 410max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
373 (183min - 385max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
355 (299min - 364max) MBit/s -5%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=200)
348 MBit/s -7%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
939 (843min - 960max) MBit/s +168%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +136%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s +123%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=183, last 2 years)
718 MBit/s +105%
Xiaomi Poco X7
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
377 (187min - 380max) MBit/s +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (361min - 375max) MBit/s +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
351 (340min - 366max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=199)
329 MBit/s -6%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=82, last 2 years)
1433 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=82, last 2 years)
1363 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (183-385)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø834 (780-913)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø351 (340-366)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø829 (758-851)
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception indoors
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

The Redmi Note 14 5G supports all common satellite navigation services, but only in single-band mode. As a result, the Xiaomi phone didn't map the route covered quite as accurately as the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch on a 4-kilometer walk and occasionally, it located us clearly off the ideal line. Nevertheless, navigation is usually fine for everyday life.

GPS test: summary
GPS test: summary
GPS test: pond
GPS test: pond
GPS test: routes
GPS test: routes

Telephone functions and call quality - The Redmi Note 14 5G without eSIM support

The Redmi Note 14 5G uses Google's standard app to make calls and delivers decent call quality. From time to time, we sounded a little tinny to the person on the other end of the line, and ambient noise wasn't always effectively suppressed. However, we noted no noise or dropouts during our test calls.

VoLTE and Wi-Fi calls can be activated in the phone's settings, but not eSIMs.

Cameras - Triple-camera with 108 MP and OIS

Photo taken using selfie camera (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Photo taken using selfie camera (image source: Manuel Masiero)

The Redmi Note 14 5G's camera setup hardly differs from that of its predecessor. The same as on the Redmi Note 13 5G, it features a 108 MP main camera with the Samsung ISOCELL HM6 as its image sensor, and an 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera using the Omnivision OV08. Its predecessor's depth sensor has now made way for a macro camera with a resolution of 2 MP.

The phone's selfie camera has also been improved, from 16 MP to 20 MP. This allows the Redmi Note 14 5G to take decent photos that accurately capture finer image details and reproduce skin tones relatively true to life. This also works reliably in portrait mode.

Its main camera takes good pictures in daylight, with vivid colors and a solid level of detail. However, there is a clear lack of dynamic range and the camera software sometimes draws object edges too sharply. If you use the digital zoom, then the image quality drops significantly. Using the preset 3x magnification, the images sometimes appear blurred and usually only depict pale colors.

When it comes to its other cameras, the Xiaomi phone offers no more than the standard fare for this price range. Its ultra-wide-angle shots are unspectacular but despite their low color saturation and low level of detail, they are still perfectly fine for simple snapshots in daylight. And the macro lens does nothing that the main camera with its digital zoom can't do.

Thanks to its OIS-stabilized main camera, the Redmi Note 14 5G can record high-quality videos. It isn't possible to switch between the main and ultra-wide-angle cameras while recording. Both work at a maximum of 1080p at 30fps.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo

In our test lab, the phone's main camera sometimes had problems capturing colors accurately, even in optimal lighting. Compared to the reference colors of the ColorChecker test chart, there were major deviations in green tones and darker shades of gray. In 1 lux of residual light, the previously sharp test chart and the ColorChecker chart could only be partially recognized.

ColorChecker
5.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
1.9 ∆E
17 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G: 7.15 ∆E min: 1.01 - max: 17.01 ∆E
ColorChecker
30.4 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
53 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.5 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
76.4 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G: 46.88 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.94 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The power supply costs extra

The EU scope of delivery of the Redmi Note 14 5G includes a USB-C cable, a SIM tool, a protective cover and two leaflets with a quick start guide as well as safety and warranty information. You'll have to take care of the matching 45-watt power supply yourself.

Xiaomi offers accessories such as power adapters, power banks and headphones in its online store. Xiaomi Care insurance cover can also be purchased for the Redmi Note 14 5G. This runs for 2 years and covers either accidental damage only or theft.

The Redmi Note 14 5G comes with a 12-month warranty in the EU, where this test was carried out.

Input devices and operation - The Redmi Note 14 5G with a fingerprint sensor

The Redmi Note 14 5G reacts sluggishly to inputs immediately after booting up and doesn't load apps immediately. However, if you are patient for a few seconds, then everything works perfectly smoothly.

The Xiaomi phone responds quickly and accurately to inputs on its touchscreen. Its vibration motor's haptic feedback can be set to three levels, the lowest of which is barely noticeable when entering text.

Biometric authentication is ensured via the phone's fingerprint sensor, which is located under its display. It recognizes fingers quickly and works even when the screen is switched off. Optionally, the smartphone can be unlocked using less secure 2D facial recognition.

Keyboard upright
Keyboard upright
Keyboard horizontal
Keyboard horizontal

Display - Bright 120 Hz AMOLED panel with PWM dimming

Sub-pixels
Sub-pixels

The Redmi Note 14 5G's 6.67-inch AMOLED display has a resolution of 2,400 × 1,080 pixels and works using a touch sampling rate of 240 Hz. Depending on the content displayed, the screen automatically switches between 60, 90 and 120 Hz. If you don't want this, you can also set the display to a fixed refresh rate of 60 or 120 Hz. HDR10, HDR10+ and HLG are supported.

Xiaomi specifies its screen brightness as being 1,200 cd/m², which is a realistic figure. During our test, we measured an average of 1,146 cd/m² and a maximum of 1,169 cd/m². When displaying HDR, the panel increased to 2,078 cd/m², so again very close to the manufacturer's specification (2,100 cd/m²). With the brightness sensor deactivated, the display managed a maximum of 466 cd/m².

Users can select an always-on function in the display settings. However, the screen only remains active for 10 seconds and only if you have tapped it beforehand.

The AMOLED display flickers at 60 Hz in all of the brightness levels we measured. At the same time, however, a PWM dimming frequency of a high 952 Hz (manufacturer's specification 980 Hz) is used to mitigate the negative effects of pulse width modulation for sensitive users.

1125
cd/m²
1135
cd/m²
1149
cd/m²
1127
cd/m²
1147
cd/m²
1167
cd/m²
1137
cd/m²
1158
cd/m²
1169
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1169 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1146 cd/m² Minimum: 2.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 1147 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.27
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"
Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco X7
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
1%
10%
-7%
13%
6%
Brightness middle
1147
1246
9%
1033
-10%
904
-21%
1156
1%
958
-16%
Brightness
1146
1235
8%
1042
-9%
912
-20%
1150
0%
965
-16%
Brightness Distribution
96
98
2%
96
0%
97
1%
98
2%
83
-14%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.6
1.8
-13%
1.6
-0%
2.1
-31%
1.1
31%
1.43
11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.7
3.81
-3%
2.5
32%
2.8
24%
3.1
16%
2.51
32%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.3
-0%
1.2
48%
2.2
4%
1.6
30%
1.4
39%
Gamma
2.27 97%
2.191 100%
2.07 106%
2.1 105%
2.22 99%
2.33 94%
CCT
6368 102%
6488 100%
6482 100%
6478 100%
6304 103%
6476 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 14.42 %
Secondary Frequency: 952 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8437 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness).

The device's display can display colors very accurately. It did this best when we changed the picture mode from the preset Vivid to Standard. With Delta-E values of less than 3, its display of color and grayscale was then in the optimum range, as was its color temperature (6,368 K).

Color accuracy (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (picture mode Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.985 ms rise
↘ 0.819 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.66 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.858 ms rise
↘ 0.8035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.3 ms).

The Redmi Note 14 5G is suitable to use outdoors. However, the brightness of its AMOLED display isn't enough to always display screen content clearly in direct sunlight, which will likely be an issue in summer in particular. Even so, you'll normally just have to hold the phone at a slightly different angle to achieve good readability.

Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Viewing angles (image source: Manuel Masiero)
Viewing angles (image source: Manuel Masiero)

Performance - The Redmi Note 14 5G with a MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Xiaomi relies almost exclusively on MediaTek processors for its current Redmi smartphones—only the Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G is an exception with its Snapdragon 7s Gen 3. In contrast, the Redmi Note 14 5G is powered by the MediaTek Dimensity 7025, which is slightly faster than the MediaTek Dimensity 6080 of its predecessor.

The Redmi Note 14 5G did well amongst the comparison devices in our test, but only ranked in the lower third when it came to performance. However, this shouldn't play a major role during everyday use, as the Xiaomi phone runs smoothly and only reaches its limits when tackling demanding apps.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=206, last 2 years)
1544 Points +63%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +19%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1030 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (947 - 1013, n=3)
973 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
947 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
769 Points -19%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=206, last 2 years)
4400 Points +91%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2977 Points +29%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2908 Points +26%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +26%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points +13%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (2299 - 2370, n=3)
2324 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2302 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1991 Points -14%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2437, n=161, last 2 years)
1093 Points +48%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points +6%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (739 - 773, n=3)
758 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
739 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
726 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
593 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=161, last 2 years)
3689 Points +76%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2741 Points +31%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (2005 - 2199, n=3)
2101 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
2100 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1943 Points -7%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +178%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +48%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
665983 Points +42%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points +28%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (469182 - 500994, n=2)
485088 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
469182 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
400029 Points -15%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
15116 Points +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=193, last 2 years)
13984 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +26%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
13406 Points +26%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (10629 - 13548, n=3)
11770 Points +11%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
10629 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10567 Points -1%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +69%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
759 Points +30%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points +19%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
601 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (585 - 597, n=2)
591 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
585 Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=156, last 2 years)
6777 Points +84%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4725 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points +20%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (3678 - 3875, n=2)
3777 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
3678 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3073 Points -16%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=156, last 2 years)
10615 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8774 Points +24%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (7104 - 7621, n=2)
7363 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
7104 Points
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6085 Points -14%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=156, last 2 years)
7498 Points +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (4735 - 5276, n=2)
5006 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4735 Points
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
4732 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3929 Points -17%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=156, last 2 years)
19261 Points +375%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +162%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8570 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points +73%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (4058 - 4087, n=2)
4073 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
4058 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3050 Points -25%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=156, last 2 years)
1611 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1401 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (1341 - 1367, n=2)
1354 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
1341 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1224 Points -9%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -35%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +343%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points +206%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9243 Points +55%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
8359 Points +41%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (5946 - 6394, n=2)
6170 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
5946 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=37, last 2 years)
908 Points +1249%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
88.8 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
74.6 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
67.3 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (n=1)
67.3 Points 0%
Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=46, last 2 years)
4075 Points +1822%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
  (212 - 267, n=2)
240 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco X7
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
234 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 6080, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
213 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 7025, IMG BXM-8-256, 8192
212 Points

The MediaTek Dimensity 7025 uses the Imagination IMG BXM-8-256 as a graphics unit, which, like the SoC, can be classified as a mid-range model in terms of its performance. However, it ranked somewhat below average compared to the competition during our test. Due to Vulkan incompatibility, most 3DMark tests didn't run on the smartphone.

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5641 Points +64%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5448 Points +59%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points +28%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3873 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3437 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +205%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5220 Points +129%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5218 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points +125%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2615 Points +15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2277 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points +142%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5308 Points +116%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5267 Points +114%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2818 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2462 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +65%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
86 fps +51%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +64%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
115 fps +60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
72 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
69 fps -4%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +45%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +28%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps -23%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +58%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
81 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
62 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
43 fps -31%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +97%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +62%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
39 fps +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
29 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -17%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +97%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +65%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -21%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +127%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +67%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -13%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +135%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +230%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps +80%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps -11%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +213%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +124%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +109%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.7 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps -12%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +67%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +61%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +56%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps -28%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +165%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +100%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -25%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +236%
Xiaomi Poco X7
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.5 fps +132%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.2 fps +121%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +107%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 7025, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.8 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
Mali-G57 MP2, Dimensity 6080, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps -11%

The Redmi Note 14 5G did consistently well in the browser benchmarks and delivered a performance that is typical for its class. The predecessor model—the Redmi Note 13 5G—was significantly slower in some cases.

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
137.7 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
111.073 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (108.8 - 111.1, n=2)
109.9 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
87.225 Points -21%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
71.171 Points -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=147, last 2 years)
168.6 runs/min +58%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (107 - 112, n=2)
109.5 runs/min +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
107 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
107 runs/min 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
72 runs/min -33%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +86%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (6.79 - 7.45, n=2)
7.12 runs/min +5%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
6.88 runs/min +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
6.79 runs/min
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min -3%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
4.27 runs/min -37%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
112 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (107 - 112, n=2)
109.5 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
100 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
82 Points -27%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=207, last 2 years)
43062 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
36371 Points
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points -1%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (34723 - 36734, n=3)
35943 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X7 (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
31245 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
23567 Points -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
22145 Points -39%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -49%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G (Chrome 125)
2014.2 ms * -78%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -39%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * -21%
Xiaomi Poco X7
1312.2 ms * -16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025 (1131 - 1132, n=2)
1131 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G (Chrome 133.0.6943.49)
1130.9 ms *
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Thanks to its UFS 2.2 flash storage, the Redmi Note 14 5G is on par with the competition and boasts relatively short loading times for apps and games.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GMotorola Edge 50 NeoNothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Poco X7Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
29%
15%
-47%
-13%
-11%
-6%
67%
Sequential Read 256KB
950.62
1023
8%
1028.37
8%
529.32
-44%
947.4
0%
951.97
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
792.56
964.6
22%
952
20%
270
-66%
915.23
15%
503.79
-36%
Random Read 4KB
257.91
331
28%
273.19
6%
244.24
-5%
100.16
-61%
243.8
-5%
Random Write 4KB
245.16
384.1
57%
311.8
27%
62.59
-74%
226.88
-7%
240.36
-2%

Games - Far from 120fps

The MediaTek Dimensity 7025's Imagination GPU IMG-BXM8-256 mostly ran our small selection of current games smoothly, as long as the level of detail wasn't set too high.

Asphalt 9 and PUBG Mobile almost always exceeded 30fps in the maximum selectable graphics settings. Genshin Impact, on the other hand, was simply one size too big for the smartphone. The game still ran smoothly at the lowest detail level, but it became jerky at maximum details.

We measured the game frame rates using our Gamebench test tool.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.4.0h: Ø59 (34-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.4.0h: Ø58.4 (27-61)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø38.2 (15-51)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø24.7 (8-31)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø40 (39-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø29.8 (18-31)

Emissions - Cool smartphone without throttling

Temperature

GFXBench battery test T-Rex
GFXBench battery test T-Rex

The Redmi Note 14 5G remains cool even under extreme load. As the T-Rex stress test from GFXBench showed, the smartphone was able to deliver its full performance at practically any time. We normally check for possible throttling with the 3DMark stress tests, however, the Redmi Note 14 5G cannot run these due to Vulkan incompatibility.

Max. Load
 39.9 °C
104 F
38.7 °C
102 F
34.5 °C
94 F
 
 39.7 °C
103 F
37.3 °C
99 F
34.1 °C
93 F
 
 36 °C
97 F
38.7 °C
102 F
33.2 °C
92 F
 
Maximum: 39.9 °C = 104 F
Average: 36.9 °C = 98 F
34.2 °C
94 F
36.2 °C
97 F
38.6 °C
101 F
32.3 °C
90 F
35.5 °C
96 F
38 °C
100 F
31.5 °C
89 F
33.9 °C
93 F
35.5 °C
96 F
Maximum: 38.6 °C = 101 F
Average: 35.1 °C = 95 F
Power Supply (max.)  29.1 °C = 84 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.9 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G

Speakers

The Redmi Note 14 5G is equipped with stereo speakers. Although they clearly lack bass, they manage to reproduce mids and highs quite linearly. The small sound membranes convey voices well. With music, however, the sound lacks depth.

For a better sound experience, we recommend connecting external speakers or a headset to the smartphone, which can be done via its 3.5 mm jack or Bluetooth 5.3. Numerous Bluetooth codecs such as AAC, LDAC and various aptX and LHDC variants are supported.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203338.52527.537.43122.834.44026.339.15036.439.16321.140.78020.741.910019.643.512512.643.716016.344.520016.347.925013.155.231512.455.34001058.450010.864.263012.465.880011.969.9100011.681.3125012.484.4160011.679.8200011.382.5250011.981.5315012.182.2400013.173.7500013.175.1630013.777.5800013.372.81000013.673.81250013.769.61600014.261.2SPL24.691.5N0.683.7median 12.6median 72.8Delta1.112.327.329.426.238.625.935.329.235.835.633.625.938.522.137.717.840.717.144.318.153.914.252.214.156.310.757.31157.312.863.511.161.51268.711.775.21280.312.878.512.480.612.381.713.380.6138213.580.213.277.813.87513.774.313.470.313.362.524.990.90.681.3median 13.2median 74.3111.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 5GSamsung Galaxy A35 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life - Only average despite its 5110 mAh battery

Power consumption

Despite the MediaTek Dimensity 7025's moderate computing power, the Redmi Note 14 5G isn't one of the most frugal smartphones in its class. Overall, however, it runs more energy-efficiently than the Nothing Phone (2a) and the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.15 / 1.55 / 1.57 Watt
Load midlight 3.87 / 7.66 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 7025
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-8%
-24%
8%
18%
5%
-17%
Idle Minimum *
1.15
0.81
30%
0.89
23%
1.09
5%
1.2
-4%
1.145 ?(1.14 - 1.15, n=2)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.55
2.01
-30%
1.99
-28%
1.28
17%
0.88
43%
1.425 ?(1.3 - 1.55, n=2)
8%
Idle Maximum *
1.57
2.07
-32%
2.14
-36%
1.31
17%
0.96
39%
Load Average *
3.87
4.16
-7%
4.57
-18%
3.25
16%
2.79
28%
Load Maximum *
7.66
7.91
-3%
12.31
-61%
8.62
-13%
8.82
-15%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.33 (1.051-6.28)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.62 (1.191-10.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.91 (2.67-3.6)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.37 (3.89-5.98)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7025; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.08-1.383)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Samsung Exynos 1380; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.46 (1.262-2.89)

Runtimes

The Redmi Note 14 5G's 5,110 mAh battery drains comparatively quickly. During our realistic Wi-Fi test, the smartphone ran for around 13 hours, while playing a video in a continuous loop lasted almost 17 hours. With the exception of the Redmi Note 13 5G, this didn't bring the competition out in a sweat, some of which achieved significantly longer runtimes.

We had a 45-watt power adapter from Xiaomi at our disposal for our test. One full charging cycle took 70 minutes. If you only want to charge up to 80 percent, you'll have to wait 55 minutes.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
12h 53min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 59min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 01min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G
5110 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
4310 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7
5110 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
7%
25%
18%
36%
-17%
Reader / Idle
1800
2522
40%
2600
44%
1160
-36%
H.264
1019
1513
48%
1401
37%
868
-15%
WiFi v1.3
773
824
7%
1011
31%
902
17%
1049
36%
801
4%
Load
361
293
-19%
262
-27%
280
-22%

Notebookcheck total rating

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G scored points in our test with its extensive features at a comparatively low price. Still, the entry-level phone would have benefited from longer software support in particular.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G - 02/28/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
44 / 69 → 64%
Weight
89%
Battery
89%
Display
90%
Games Performance
7 / 55 → 13%
Application Performance
59 / 85 → 69%
AI Performance
11%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
78 / 90 → 87%
Camera
64%
Average
60%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
66.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 42.1%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 5G review - The powerful entry-level smartphone with a big price advantage
Manuel Masiero, 2025-03- 1 (Update: 2025-03- 1)