Notebookcheck Logo
Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE smartphone review - Is this already a Pro?

Sitting on the fence.

With the Redmi 14 Pro, Xiaomi offers a device lacking 5G. It has a 200 MPix lens, an ultra-wide-angle camera and a new MediaTek CPU is at work under the hood. Our review clears up any doubt whether the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE is the happy medium or just mediocre.
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict - The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE is sitting on the fence

With the Redmi Note 14 series, Xiaomi has opted for small changes between the devices. This means that some phones are in a tight spot. The Note 14 Pro LTE has a hard time distinguishing itself from the cheaper Note 14 LTE model: The new processor achieves the same performance, and both the memory and feature set are on a similar level. The display has curved sides, the main camera has more megapixels and an ultra-wide-angle lens is also on board. With the same memory, the manufacturer wants you to fork out an additional $100 - at least according to the RRP.

For an extra $50, Xiaomi offers the Redmi Note 14 Pro 5G. It comes with a more performant processor, shoots 4K videos and has access to the 5G network such as Wi-Fi 6. The Poco X7 Pro from the same company offers even more power. This means that the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE isn't quite sure where it stands and, all in all, is not very impressive.

Pros

+ bright 120 Hz AMOLED display
+ smooth everyday performance
+ storage expansion via microSD
+ audio jack

Cons

- only WiFi 5
- low performance reserves
- input errors on the display edges
- average voice quality

Price and availability

At the time of reviewing, Xiaomi only sells a configuration of the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE with 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage space. This device has a UK RRP of £300. However, the market price is already as much as £100 lower at the time of reviewing.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
75.3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Natbok 2+2 Pack 3D Screen Pr...
2. $319.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
3. $359.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
List Price: 350€
180 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
2.
85.9% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 ⎘
ARM Mali-G68 MP5 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $5.98
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
2. $4.99
Mr.Shield Screen Protector C...
3. $6.95
NEW'C 3 Pack Designed for Sa...
List Price: 379€
209 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
3.
80.9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $11.39
Ibywind Screen Protector For...
3. $6.79
Natbok 2+2 Pack for Poco X7 ...
List Price: 430€
198 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
4.
86.9% v7 (old)
Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $11.39
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
3. $11.99
Foluu Clear Case for Nothing...
List Price: 329€
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1084
394 PPI
AMOLED
5.
82.5% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $359.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $319.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
3. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Redmi Not...
List Price: 399€
188 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

Xiaomi offers an entire Redmi Note 14 series. This review concerns the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE. Design-wise, the curved display and a different camera design on the rear are noticeable compared to the cheaper non-Pro Note 14.

The main and selfie cameras also have more megapixels and the newer processor should ensure better performance. However, it is unusual for a manufacturer in this price range to offer a Pro model that lacks 5G support.

Xiaomi lists different versions on the smartphone's product page. The entry-level model offers 8 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage space. There are also models with 256 GB of storage and either 8 or 12 GB of RAM. The largest variant has 512 GB of storage space and 12 GB of RAM. However, only the combination of 8 GB of RAM and 256 GB of storage is listed on the sales page, and this also corresponds to our review model.

There are three colors to choose from: Aurora Purple, Midnight Black and Ocean Blue. Our review device is black.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G100 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3,5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, OTG, IR-Blaster, FM-Radio
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (GSM: 850/ 900/ 1800/ 1900MHz); 3G (WCDMA: 1/ 2/ 4/ 5/ 8); 4G (LTE FDD:1/ 2/ 3/ 4/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 12/ 13/ 17/ 20/ 26/ 28/ 66; LTE TDD: 38/ 40/ 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.24 x 162.16 x 74.92 ( = 0.32 x 6.38 x 2.95 in)
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix OIS, f/1.65, 1/1,4" sensor-size; 8 MPix ultrawide, f/2.2; 2 MPix macro, f/2.4
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.2
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, Case, USB-Cable, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1), Beidou (B1l), SBAS; HDR10, HLG; Camera2API Level 3; Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+LHDC V1/ V2/ V3/ V4/ V5; SAR-Head: 0.8 W/kg, SAR-Body 0.98 W/kg; IP64, fanless
Weight
180 g ( = 6.35 oz / 0.4 pounds), Power Supply: 108 g ( = 3.81 oz / 0.24 pounds)
Price
350 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Note 14 Pro has a curved display

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE fits nicely in the hand. The rounded back makes it feel narrower than it is. The build quality is good, the buttons sit firmly in place, and the gaps are small and even. The rear camera bump protrudes quite far, but it is positioned in such a way that the smartphone hardly wobbles when lying on a table.

The shiny aluminum alloy frame clearly shows fingerprints and dust, and dirt also collects in the area between the camera lenses. The slightly shiny plastic rear sounds a touch hollow, but the smartphone is very stable and is difficult to twist, even when force is applied.

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE possesses IP64 certification, and the display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2.

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE color variants. Image source: Xiaomi
The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE color variants. Image source: Xiaomi
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel
Image source: Benedikt Winkel

Size comparison

162.16 mm / 6.38 in 74.92 mm / 2.95 in 8.24 mm / 0.3244 in 180 g0.3968 lbs161.74 mm / 6.37 in 76.32 mm / 3 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.7 mm / 6.37 in 78 mm / 3.07 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 209 g0.4608 lbs160.75 mm / 6.33 in 75.24 mm / 2.96 in 8.43 mm / 0.3319 in 198 g0.4365 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 75 mm / 2.95 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Xiaomi has gone with an audio jack and microSD

Xiaomi has stayed true to itself and offers the Redmi Note 14 Pro with a 3.5 mm audio jack, IR blaster and memory that can be expanded using a microSD card. Unfortunately, the familiar picture continues with the USB-C port, which only supports the USB 2.0 standard. Although, it does at least support exFAT and NTFS as file systems.

Combined with a Samsung 980 Pro SSD, we achieved average transfer speeds of 26.17 MB/s. The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE also has stereo speakers and is Dolby Atmos certified.

microSD card reader

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE's memory can be expanded by up to 1 TB using a microSD card with the card fitting into a hybrid slot. In our tests, we used our reference card, the AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60.

Using this, we achieved an average transfer speed of 25.51 MB/s. This makes the Redmi Note 14 Pro significantly slower than
its predecessor. The Samsung Galaxy A35 enjoys transfer speeds which are twice as fast. 

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
55.32 MB/s +117%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
36.3 MB/s +42%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 58.9, n=69, last 2 years)
30.6 MB/s +20%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
25.51 MB/s

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

051015202530354045505560657075Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø27.3 (19.5-31.2)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.5 (26.8-45.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø40.3 (26.8-45.5)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (46.2-79.8)

Software - The Redmi Note has HyperOS and a shortened update plan

Out of the box, Xiaomi's Redmi Note 14 Pro comes with Android 14, using HyperOS 1.0 as its interface. In addition to the Xiaomi and Google apps, numerous third-party programs are installed. However, these can be easily uninstalled.

HyperOS offers numerous customization options, but advertisements in some apps are annoying, especially during downloads. Xiaomi's update policy is opaque, the Note 14 Pro LTE will receive updates for shorter periods than the Note 14 LTE. The manufacturer promises three years of OS and four years of security updates. At the time of this review, the security patch is from December 2024.

Sustainability - Xiaomi is focusing on longevity

Xiaomi has not provided any information regarding the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE's carbon footprint. The packaging is largely plastic-free but doesn't do without it entirely. After all, the smartphone is supposed to be particularly stable and therefore also durable. Xiaomi aims to achieve this with reinforced corners and shock-absorbing foams on the inside.

Communication and GNSS - The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE only comes with WiFi 5

The Redmi Note 14 Pro only supports WiFi 5. Accordingly, the transfer speeds in combination with our reference router, the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000, are lower than with the comparison devices. Compared to the predecessor, the data-receiving speed has increased slightly.

In our tests, the connection was stable. Unlike the Redmi Note 14 LTE test, we also didn't experience any sudden dropouts with the Pro model. The Note 14 Pro LTE comes - as the name suggests - without a 5G connection. The LTE connection is fast and reliable, and more bands are covered than with the cheaper Note 14 LTE model.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
965 (877min - 991max) MBit/s +162%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
834 (780min - 913max) MBit/s +127%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=184, last 2 years)
730 MBit/s +98%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s +85%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
368 (360min - 375max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
358 (332min - 368max) MBit/s -3%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=200)
348 MBit/s -5%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
899 (822min - 924max) MBit/s +138%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
830 (758min - 851max) MBit/s +120%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s +107%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=182, last 2 years)
720 MBit/s +91%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
377 (336min - 380max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=199)
329 MBit/s -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
290 (240min - 317max) MBit/s -23%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=81, last 2 years)
1430 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=81, last 2 years)
1372 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø368 (360-375)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (332-368)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (336-380)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø290 (240-317)
GNSS measurement: Indoors
GNSS measurement: Indoors
GNSS measurement: Outdoors
GNSS measurement: Outdoors

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE supports all the common satellite systems but only uses a single band. The positioning is not particularly precise, as a stroll with our Garmin Venu 2 reference device showed. The recorded route often deviated from the mapped paths. However, navigation in everyday life, for example, with Google Maps, is not a problem.

GNSS measurement: Pond
GNSS measurement: Pond
GNSS measurement: Paths
GNSS measurement: Paths
GNSS measurement: Summary
GNSS measurement: Summary

Telephone functions and voice quality - The Redmi Note 14 Pro and tinny voices

The Redmi Note 14 Pro's phone quality is disappointing - at least for the person on the other end. The caller's voice is reproduced loudly and clearly. However, the Redmi user's voice comes across as tinny, muffled and somewhat choppy. Voices almost sounds as if the hands-free function is being used all the time. The noise cancellation could also be better.

Xiaomi uses Google for its software and the app is clear and not at all confusing.

Cameras - The Redmi's 200 MPix doesn't meet expectations

A selfie with the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE. Image source: Benedikt Winkel
A selfie with the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE. Image source: Benedikt Winkel

In its advertizing, Xiaomi emphasizes the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE's camera quality. The shots are said to be particularly dynamic, thanks to an AI-optimized algorithm, however, the test shots lack some sharpness and the colors were also quite pale. The digital zoom is usable even at 5x magnification, but the details are a bit muddy. Overall, the images fell short of our expectations.

Shots in difficult lighting conditions turned out well, but there was significant image noise. The quality of the images from the ultra-wide-angle camera is lower than that of the main camera. The 32 MPix selfie camera takes sharp pictures but is prone to lens flare. The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE has a 200 MPix mode for images at full resolution and a Pro mode for manual settings.

The smartphone's video quality is decent, and thanks to OIS, steady shots are possible. On top of this, the autofocus and exposure adjustment work reliably and quickly. Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p, with 60 fps a possibility with the main camera, but only 30 fps with the other lenses.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitPondUltra-Wide-Angle5x ZoomLow Light
ColorChecker
8 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
15 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
11 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE: 6.34 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 14.97 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
54.9 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
61.6 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
33.8 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
63.9 ∆E
29.2 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.1 ∆E
76 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
92 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE: 46.67 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.05 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Redmi comes with a screen protector and Xiaomi Care

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE comes in various forms of retail boxes. The packaging also includes a 45-watt power adapter, but this is not included with the device in Germany. At the factory, a well-fitted protective film was applied to the display, and this didn't come off during the test period. The manufacturer also includes a flexible, snug-fitting case with the device.

In Germany, Xiaomi's device is covered by a 12-month warranty, but the 24-month warranty remains unaffected. The manufacturer offers the "Xiaomi Care" program for its Redmi Note 14 Pro in Germany. The basic package costs 24 euros (around $25) and covers two cases of damage - even if this was caused by the user - per insurance year. For 44 euros (about $46), the device can also be insured against theft. 

In Germany, the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE comes without a charger. Image source: Benedikt Winkel
In Germany, the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE comes without a charger. Image source: Benedikt Winkel

Input devices & operation - Input errors on the Redmi Pro's display

Xiaomi uses a curved-edged display in its Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE. Swiping gestures feel good despite the applied protective film. However, the ends of the film are noticeable at the curved edges. In our test, not every input was recognized on the curves of the display. This was the case with the settings button on YouTube, which is located exactly in that area.

Out of the box, Google's Gboard is the default keyboard, and typing is easy and mostly error-free. We liked the quiet, linear vibration motor. Unlocking is possible via an optical fingerprint reader beneath the display and via 2D face unlock. Both work very quickly and reliably.

Display - The Note 14 Pro LTE has good brightness and high-frequency PWM

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE uses a 20:9 aspect ratio, 6.67-inch AMOLED panel. The display offers a maximum refresh rate of 120 Hz, and according to DRM information, there are intermediate steps at 30, 60 and 90 Hz. The software factory setting automatically adjusts the rate to the content.

We measured a maximum brightness of 1,356 cd/m² with the ambient light sensor activated, meaning the Redmi is significantly brighter than the comparison devices. The varying brightness distribution is not noticeable in everyday life. Without the brightness sensor, the Note 14 Pro reaches a maximum of 488 nits. With HDR and APL18 content, the display gets even brighter, and we measured 1,654 nits in the APL18 test and 1,715 cd/m² with HDR content.

Our measurements confirmed the observed screen flickering at two different frequencies. A basic 120 Hz flicker and high-frequency PWM dimming at 1,666 Hz. According to the manufacturer, PWM dimming should go as high as 1,920 Hz.

In our test, the permanently regulating ambient light sensor was annoying. Especially in buildings, the smartphone constantly switches the brightness up and down, fluctuating between brightness levels that are either too bright or too dark.

1265
cd/m²
1287
cd/m²
1347
cd/m²
1264
cd/m²
1298
cd/m²
1356
cd/m²
1263
cd/m²
1287
cd/m²
1356
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1356 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1302.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1298 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.86
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-3%
18%
13%
3%
Brightness middle
1298
904
-30%
1034
-20%
1033
-20%
994
-23%
Brightness
1303
912
-30%
1041
-20%
1042
-20%
979
-25%
Brightness Distribution
93
97
4%
97
4%
96
3%
95
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.8
2.1
-17%
1
44%
1.6
11%
1.36
24%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.5
2.8
49%
2.2
60%
2.5
55%
3.61
34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
2.2
4%
1.4
39%
1.2
48%
2.2
4%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.1 105%
2.22 99%
2.07 106%
2.287 96%
CCT
6104 106%
6478 100%
6553 99%
6482 100%
6392 102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 15.96 %
Secondary Frequency: 1666 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8439 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

A series of measurements with fixed levels of zoom and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The enlarged version of the amplitude curve at minimum brightness can be seen in the info box.)

When it comes to color reproduction, the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE has to admit defeat to the comparison devices. There are deviations, especially in the red tones, which are too saturated. According to the Calman 2D measurement, the sRGB color space is covered to 99.7 percent.

Color accuracy (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Color space (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Color space (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Gray scales (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Gray scales (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (display mode Natural, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.63 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.894 ms rise
↘ 0.737 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.06 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.02 ms rise
↘ 1.036 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.4 ms).

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE has impressive viewing angles. Content can be easily seen even from wide angles, and there are no color deviations to speak of. When used outdoors, the smartphone is also readable in sunlight. When viewed from the side, we would like to see even higher brightness.

Performance - The Note 14 Pro LTE has a Helio G100 but lacks increased performance

There is a surprise in the benchmark measurements. The Redmi Note 14 Pro with the MediaTek Helio G100 achieved comparable scores to last year's Redmi Note 13 Pro with the MediaTek Helio G99. The comparison devices, however, play in a league of their own regarding the Geekbench and Antutu benchmarks - especially the Poco X7 Pro with its Dimensity 8400.

Nevertheless, in everyday situations, the Redmi Note 14 Pro runs considerably smoother than the Redmi Note 14 LTE, which also uses a Helio G99.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1598 Points +120%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=205, last 2 years)
1544 Points +113%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1017 Points +40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
731 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
725 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
725 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
6239 Points +225%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=205, last 2 years)
4401 Points +129%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2906 Points +51%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points +35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2000 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1922 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
1922 Points 0%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1160 Points +113%
Average of class Smartphone
  (145 - 2437, n=160, last 2 years)
1094 Points +101%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points +63%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
783 Points +44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
558 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
545 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
545 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5284 Points +202%
Average of class Smartphone
  (550 - 8816, n=160, last 2 years)
3693 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
2778 Points +59%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1922 Points +10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1749 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
1749 Points 0%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1695493 Points +286%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=138, last 2 years)
1303791 Points +197%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points +58%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
602612 Points +37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
439283 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
439283 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
14805 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=192, last 2 years)
13982 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
13430 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10933 Points +2%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10723 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
10723 Points 0%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1287 Points +122%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=157, last 2 years)
990 Points +70%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
647 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
581 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
581 Points 0%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8278 Points +180%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=154, last 2 years)
6801 Points +130%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4416 Points +49%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2960 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
2960 Points 0%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=154, last 2 years)
10640 Points +71%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
8843 Points +42%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8761 Points +40%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6238 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
6238 Points 0%
Memory
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8484 Points +143%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=154, last 2 years)
7516 Points +115%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points +31%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
4301 Points +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3493 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
3493 Points 0%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
36491 Points +1187%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)
19418 Points +585%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points +275%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
7040 Points +148%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2836 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
2836 Points 0%
Web
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1731 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=154, last 2 years)
1612 Points +30%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
1421 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1243 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
1243 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -30%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
49010 Points +452%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points +196%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=149, last 2 years)
18171 Points +105%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
8882 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
8882 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
5987 Points -33%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
29244 Points +3386%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=138, last 2 years)
27735 Points +3206%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points +1260%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mediatek Helio G100, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
839 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100
  (n=1)
839 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Samsung Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5, 6144
545 Points -35%

In terms of the GPU, Xiaomi has opted to use the same hardware as the predecessor as well as the cheaper Redmi Note 14 LTE - the Mali-G57 MP2 graphics chip. This means that the Xiaomi smartphone has no chance against the competing devices, coming last in every benchmark.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3691 Points +1005%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points +246%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
796 Points +138%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
334 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
334 Points
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3840 Points +1016%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points +235%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
809 Points +135%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
342 Points -1%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12261 Points +901%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points +248%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2796 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1225 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1223 Points 0%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4140 Points +235%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2820 Points +128%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1237 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1214 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6358 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6277 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1272 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6996 Points +91%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4391 Points +20%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3668 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3628 Points -1%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20018 Points +724%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points +186%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5118 Points +111%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2438 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2428 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14161 Points +439%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points +127%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4936 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2630 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2625 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +126%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps +77%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
568 fps +802%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps +152%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
118 fps +87%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +243%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +94%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
243 fps +508%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +145%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
79 fps +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +417%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +148%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +104%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
199 fps +1227%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +347%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +247%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps +658%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps +183%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +713%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps +167%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +100%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps +780%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +298%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +141%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.2 fps +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps +1009%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps +282%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +136%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps +800%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +300%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +150%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps +993%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +279%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +143%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps +1067%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps +292%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.8 fps +142%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
139.947 Points +81%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
137.7 Points +78%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
115.153 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
77.2 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100 (n=1)
77.2 Points 0%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -1%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
192 runs/min +178%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
169 runs/min +145%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min +51%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
104 runs/min +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
69.1 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G100 (n=1)
69.1 runs/min 0%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=96, last 2 years)
12.6 runs/min +142%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
11.7 runs/min +125%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min +27%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
5.81 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
5.2 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G100 (n=1)
5.2 runs/min 0%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
144 Points +73%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=157, last 2 years)
128.2 Points +54%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
123 Points +48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
83 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100 (n=1)
83 Points 0%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
47146 Points +100%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=206, last 2 years)
43074 Points +83%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
36010 Points +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
23522 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G100 (n=1)
23522 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (Chrome 123)
20319 Points -14%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -21%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average Mediatek Helio G100 (n=1)
1775 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE (chrome 132)
1774.6 ms *
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * +12%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=166, last 2 years)
1364 ms * +23%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Chrome 123.0.6312.100)
1099 ms * +38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
882.5 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTESamsung Galaxy A35 5GXiaomi Poco X7 ProNothing Phone (2a)Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-42%
110%
25%
4%
2%
78%
Sequential Read 256KB
933
529.32
-43%
3969.01
325%
1028.37
10%
933.8
0%
Sequential Write 256KB
798
270
-66%
1813.29
127%
952
19%
795.4
0%
Random Read 4KB
218
244.24
12%
362.61
66%
273.19
25%
246.8
13%
Random Write 4KB
215
62.59
-71%
49.17
-77%
311.8
45%
222.2
3%
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.4.0h: Ø57.4 (44-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.4.0h: Ø54.3 (40-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø32.2 (13-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø29.8 (3-60)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø39.8 (34-41)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø29.9 (24-31)

Emissions - The Note 14 Pro LTE has Dolby Atmos

Temperature - The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE remains consistently cool

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE stays pleasantly cool in everyday life as well as when playing games or watching films. Under extreme load in the Burnout benchmark, we recorded a maximum temperature of 37.8 degrees Celsius on the top of the device. On the bottom, the maximum was only 35 degrees Celsius.

In the stress tests, the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE is stable and hardly throttles at all. The Steel Nomad stress test was aborted by the device.

Max. Load
 37.8 °C
100 F
37.1 °C
99 F
33.9 °C
93 F
 
 37.6 °C
100 F
36.5 °C
98 F
33.4 °C
92 F
 
 35.7 °C
96 F
35.7 °C
96 F
33.9 °C
93 F
 
Maximum: 37.8 °C = 100 F
Average: 35.7 °C = 96 F
33.1 °C
92 F
34.9 °C
95 F
35 °C
95 F
32.5 °C
91 F
34.9 °C
95 F
34.8 °C
95 F
31.6 °C
89 F
33.7 °C
93 F
34 °C
93 F
Maximum: 35 °C = 95 F
Average: 33.8 °C = 93 F
Power Supply (max.)  27.4 °C = 81 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.7 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 %
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 % -1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.8 % -2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 % -46%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 % 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 % -44%
05101520Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.08 (2.07-2.09)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.83 (4.82-4.84)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø6.89 (6.88-6.91)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.42-7.45)
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Mali-G68 MP5, Exynos 1380, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø16.7 (16.6-17)
Nothing Phone (2a) Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø24.7 (24.6-24.8)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.33 (7.31-7.34)

Speakers - The Xiaomi offers stereo sound and an audio jack

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE has stereo speakers and is Dolby Atmos certified. Sounds are emitted on the top of the device both through the earpiece to the front and through an opening in the frame to the top.

The mids are balanced, and this is a noticeable improvement over the predecessor. Bass or low frequencies, on the other hand, are absent. In addition, the rear vibrates noticeably at higher volumes.

The Redmi Note 14 Pro has a headphone jack. At 74.09 dBFS, the measured signal-to-noise level is only moderate. In our tests, the smartphone connected easily to various Bluetooth headphones.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203334.82527.527.63122.823.64026.330.45036.439.46321.1238020.717.310019.621.612512.632.116016.34520016.34425013.150.331512.454.84001056.550010.862.863012.466.880011.969.8100011.677.1125012.477.6160011.674.6200011.374.9250011.972.7315012.174.4400013.174.8500013.174.9630013.776.7800013.3731000013.673.91250013.7691600014.266.1SPL24.686.4N0.667median 12.6median 69.8Delta1.19.842.23833.233.527.126.530.528.43431.425.823.41717.919.922.225.427.317.334.910.639.714.447.58.149.97.450.77.860.4961.112.561.417.273.49.4731072.69.867.810.362.31162.31265.912.670.913.572.714.46815.271.315.971.816.851.524.881.60.648.4median 12.5median 62.33.211.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTEXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtime - The Note 14 Pro LTE charges quickly

Power consumption - The Redmi is economical

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE's low-level computing power is largely reflected in the smartphone's low energy consumption. However, the device isn't the front-runner in every discipline.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.15 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.13 / 1.21 / 1.25 Watt
Load midlight 5.35 / 7.25 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
5500 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G100
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-34%
-24%
-18%
0%
-19%
Idle Minimum *
1.13
0.89
21%
1.07
5%
0.81
28%
1.13 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.21
1.99
-64%
1.29
-7%
2.01
-66%
1.21 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.25
2.14
-71%
1.36
-9%
2.07
-66%
1.25 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average *
5.35
4.57
15%
6.14
-15%
4.16
22%
5.35 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum *
7.25
12.31
-70%
13.94
-92%
7.91
-9%
7.25 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.61 (0.919-5.19)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.58 (0.875-6.87)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.996 (0.882-1.459)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.058 (0.954-1.125)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.82.12.32.52.833.23.53.73.94.24.4Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.27 (1.85-2.62)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.26 (3.93-4.62)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE Mediatek Helio G100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.996 (0.882-1.459)
Nothing Phone (2a) MediaTek Dimensity 7200; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.058 (0.954-1.125)

Battery life - The Note 14 Pro LTE is an average performer

In our realistic WiFi web surfing test, the Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE achieved a runtime of 17 hours, surpassing the Note 13 Pro 4G, At 5,500 mAh, however, it has a 10 percent larger battery capacity.

The Nothing Phone 2a has a more powerful processor that manages almost the same time with a capacity of 5,000 mAh. In everyday life, as long as you don't play games or watch long videos, you will be able to use the device for two days without recharging.

The Note 14 Pro LTE is charged at a maximum of 45 watts - wireless charging is not supported. The smartphone charges from 1 to 60 percent in 35 minutes and takes 75 minutes to fully charge from 1 to 100 percent.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 02min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE
5500 mAh
1022 min
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G
5000 mAh
902 min
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh
1183 min
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
1011 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
5000 mAh
969 min

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE has a problem: It is hardly any better than the much cheaper Note 14 LTE and not much cheaper than the better-equipped Note 14 Pro 5G. The smartphone gets left behind in terms of performance by the comparable devices in this price range.

The camera performance is not bad but fell short of our expectations. The bright AMOLED display and the balanced speakers made a positive impression. With NFC, memory expansion and an audio jack, the Note 14 Pro LTE is also well-equipped. However, the device is too expensive for the performance it offers.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE - 02/21/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
87%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
43 / 69 → 62%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance
54 / 85 → 63%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
93%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 86%
Camera
69%
Average
58%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
25%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
97%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro LTE smartphone review - Is this already a Pro?
Benedikt Winkel, 2025-02-24 (Update: 2025-03- 4)