Notebookcheck Logo

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G smartphone review - Midranger with AMOLED and good cameras

Cost-cutting measures. If you are looking for a good mid-range phone and can do without 5G, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is an affordable offer. The high-quality camera, modern chassis, and fast charging technology of the 5G model are retained. Did the manufacturer still add some cutbacks to save?
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G (Redmi Note 13 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 512 GB 
, 495 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 1TB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8 x 161.1 x 75 ( = 0.31 x 6.34 x 2.95 in)
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 67 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 200 MPix f/​1.65, phase comparison-AF (All-pixel AF/​omnidirectional), OIS, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/​2.2, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/​2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/​2.4, Videos @1080p/​60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid) , silicone bumper, charger, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, IP54-certified, SAR: 0.992W/​kg Head, 0.993W/​kg Body , fanless
Weight
188 g ( = 6.63 oz / 0.41 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
82.5 %
05/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
188 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2400x1080
85.8 %
01/2024
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
SD 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710
187 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"2712x1220
83.9 %
02/2024
Honor Magic6 Lite
SD 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"2652x1200
81.9 %
12/2022
Motorola Moto G72
Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2
166 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2400x1080

Case and features - High-quality plastic housing

Not all smartphone buyers need 5G, so there is room for a high-quality mid-range phone with 4G offered at a slightly lower price. This is where the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G from Xiaomi makes its grand entrance, as it brings many advantages of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G but is 50 euros cheaper.

Although the back is similar, Xiaomi has made some design changes to make the 4G model recognizable at first glance. There is no grouped camera module that stands out in terms of color and feel, but rather individual lenses in the housing. Two slightly lighter stripes run across the upper part of the back. The available colors are green, purple, and black.

The front of the 4G model also has very slim display edges and the punch hole for the front camera is also very small. The device can hardly be twisted even with force and appears very stable overall. Material transitions cannot be felt and all corners are nicely rounded so that the phone sits comfortably in the hand.

Protection against dust and splash water according to IP54 is provided, but the device should not be immersed in water.

Xiaomi offers two storage variants of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G:

  • 8 GB RAM / 256 GB storage: 349 euros
  • 12 GB RAM / 512 GB storage: 399 euros

NFC is on board, as is an infrared blaster, with the help of which the phone can be used as a remote control for other devices. There is also a 3.5 mm audio port.

Unlike the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G, there is no support for eSIMs, but there is a microSD reader. This occupies one of the two SIM slots and achieved mediocre speeds for the price range in our tests with the Angelbird V60 reference memory card.


Size comparison

163.6 mm / 6.44 inch 75.5 mm / 2.97 inch 7.98 mm / 0.3142 inch 185 g0.4079 lbs161.2 mm / 6.35 inch 74.3 mm / 2.93 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 187 g0.4123 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 inch 75 mm / 2.95 inch 8 mm / 0.315 inch 188 g0.4145 lbs160.5 mm / 6.32 inch 74.4 mm / 2.93 inch 7.9 mm / 0.311 inch 166 g0.366 lbs148 mm / 5.83 inch 105 mm / 4.13 inch 1 mm / 0.03937 inch 1.5 g0.00331 lbs
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
36.3 MB/s
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash (Angelbird V60)
34.2 MB/s -6%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø39.5 (26.8-45.5)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.8 (26.7-49.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.5 (46.2-79.8)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø70.6 (29.3-82.6)

Communication, software and operation - Updates until 2028

Thanks to many 4G frequencies, the smartphone can also be used for mobile Internet in many countries when traveling. We liked the reception quality during our test period.

WiFi 5 is the fastest Wi-Fi standard Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G supports. This enables speeds of around 300 - 350 MBit/s. The device is slower on Wi-Fi than the 5G version and is almost exactly half as fast. However, this will only be noticeable in everyday use for large downloads.

Xiaomi installs Android 13 ex-works and overlays the older MIUI interface, but an update to Android 14 and Xiaomi's new HyperOS is now also available. The security patches are from March 2024 at the time of testing and are therefore still reasonably up-to-date. Xiaomi wants to deliver 2 more operating system versions and security patches by 2028.

There are quite a few apps pre-installed on the phone, including many advertising apps and games. So if you want a clean system, you have to delete some of them.

The 120 Hz screen allows for extremely fast and responsive inputs, even at the corners and edges. The fingerprint sensor is integrated into the display - it unlocks the phone very quickly and reliably. Face recognition also works perfectly, even in dim light.

Networking
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
290 (min: 240) MBit/s ∼45%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
358 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000
581 (min: 491) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
678 (min: 544) MBit/s ∼99%
Honor Magic6 Lite
iperf3 receive AXE11000
340 (min: 173) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
316 (min: 278) MBit/s ∼46%
Motorola Moto G72
iperf3 receive AXE11000
333 (min: 307) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
359 (min: 338) MBit/s ∼52%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000
651 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
686 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼100%
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320340360Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø290 (240-317)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (332-368)

Cameras - High-quality mid-range cameras

Photo from the front camera
Photo from the front camera

The high-quality camera system of the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G has also been adopted for the 4G model. Photos from the back of the phone are usually taken with the 200-megapixel main camera, which usually combines every 16 pixels for a higher light yield and thus takes 12-megapixel pictures. The full resolution can be used in a special mode. The images are protected from blurring by an optical stabilizer.

The photos from the main camera are pleasing with a lot of detail and very good brightness in darker situations. We also found the sharpness to be good, although there were some dropouts in certain areas.

Videos can only be recorded at 1080p and 60 fps on the 4G model; the 4K function of the 5G model has been removed.

The wide-angle camera offers 8 megapixels and takes decent pictures, but the sharpness drops significantly towards the edges. Xiaomi has also installed a 2-megapixel macro camera for extreme close-ups. This is suitable for snapshots, but you should not enlarge the images too much.

There is a selfie camera on the front with a resolution of 16 megapixels. The photos look reasonably well-lit and offer a decent level of detail for the price range.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow LightUltra wide-angle
ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: 7.03 ∆E min: 2.25 - max: 12.23 ∆E
ColorChecker
13.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
23 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G: 10.03 ∆E min: 4.8 - max: 23.02 ∆E

Display - Bright and true-color AMOLED

Subpixel structure
Subpixel structure

The screen is not quite as bright as in the 5G model. Although the Redmi Note 13 4G also has an AMOLED screen, there are other differences: the resolution is slightly lower and the PWM flickering has a lower frequency.

Specifically, we measured a maximum brightness of around 1,000 cd/m², which corresponds exactly to the manufacturer's specification. The brightness can increase even further on small surfaces, where we measured 1,198 cd/m². The brightness distribution is quite even and the color reproduction is at a very high level, so you also get a very high-quality display with the Redmi Note 13 4G.

954
cd/m²
967
cd/m²
986
cd/m²
1001
cd/m²
994
cd/m²
962
cd/m²
972
cd/m²
983
cd/m²
988
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 1001 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 978.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 95 %
Center on Battery: 994 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
105.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.287
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.67
Honor Magic6 Lite
AMOLED, 2652x1200, 6.78
Motorola Moto G72
P-OLED, 2400x1080, 6.60
Screen
-0%
23%
-67%
Brightness middle
994
1205
21%
1003
1%
992
0%
Brightness
979
1177
20%
1007
3%
980
0%
Brightness Distribution
95
90
-5%
96
1%
92
-3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.36
1.51
-11%
0.8
41%
4.56
-235%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.61
4.07
-13%
2.4
34%
7.96
-120%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.5
-14%
0.9
59%
3.1
-41%
Gamma
2.287 96%
2.175 101%
2.18 101%
2.233 99%
CCT
6392 102%
6407 101%
6406 101%
7098 92%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 119 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 119 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 119 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17803 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

minimum brightness
minimum brightness
25% brightness
25% brightness
50% brightness
50% brightness
75% brightness
75% brightness
100% brightness
100% brightness

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings


CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color accuracy
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN color space sRGB
CalMAN saturation
CalMAN saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9 ms rise
↘ 0.9 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.4 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.8 ms rise
↘ 0.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms).

Performance, emissions and battery life - Quite low power

With the MediaTek Helio G99 Xiaomi has opted for a rather slow SoC, and compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G you have to accept significant performance losses. Other manufacturers now also offer faster phones in this price range.

In everyday use, the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is not a slow cell phone; smooth navigation through the menus is possible without any problems in most cases. The difference in performance is only really noticeable when running multitasking or more complex apps. Xiaomi has opted for UFS 2.2 flash memory, which is fast and enables short loading times.

The phone's casing can heat up to 40.8 °C after prolonged use; we measured it at room temperature. This is noticeable, but not critical, and the 3DMark stress tests show that the SoC can maintain its performance even under prolonged load.

The speaker on the bottom edge is supported by the earpiece, so stereo sound is possible. The sound is full and quite warm, making it a pleasure to listen to music. Of course, you have to do without bass and low mids for the most part, but we like the sound for a mid-range class.

If you want even better sound, you can connect headphones or speakers via the 3.5 mm jack connection or Bluetooth. Almost all currently available wireless codecs are supported for the latter.

At 5,000 mAh, the battery is slightly smaller than in the 5G model, but still managed a good runtime of over 16 hours in our Wi-Fi test. This means you can get through a day of heavy use without charging. If the phone does need to be plugged in, it can be charged with up to 67 watts via the supplied power adapter and is thus fully charged again in just under an hour.

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (119 - 2138, n=216, last 2 years)
915 Points +64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
783 Points +40%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
735 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
558 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=15)
546 Points -2%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
540 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6681, n=216, last 2 years)
3000 Points +56%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2736 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2678 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1922 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=15)
1840 Points -4%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1810 Points -6%
Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 2930, n=112, last 2 years)
1373 Points +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
1029 Points +41%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
940 Points +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
731 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (710 - 738, n=9)
729 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 7408, n=112, last 2 years)
3804 Points +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
2955 Points +48%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2776 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2000 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=9)
1997 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
12967 Points +19%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
12573 Points +15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4761 - 21385, n=215, last 2 years)
11875 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10933 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
10589 Points -3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8973 - 11027, n=15)
9862 Points -10%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 42, n=219, last 2 years)
12.5 fps +381%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
5.8 fps +123%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4.7 fps +81%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2.6 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2.5 fps -4%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2.2 - 2.8, n=15)
2.5 fps -4%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=227, last 2 years)
33 fps +259%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
15 fps +63%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
12 fps +30%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8.3 - 28, n=15)
11.6 fps +26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
9.2 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
8.9 fps -3%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 94, n=227, last 2 years)
25.9 fps +332%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
13 fps +117%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
11 fps +83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
6 fps
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
5.9 fps -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5.4 - 6.5, n=15)
5.87 fps -2%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=227, last 2 years)
44.3 fps +216%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
23 fps +64%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (12 - 44, n=15)
17.6 fps +26%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
14 fps
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
10 fps -29%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 229, n=227, last 2 years)
64.9 fps +306%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35 fps +119%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
20 fps +25%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
16 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
16 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (14 - 18, n=15)
15.7 fps -2%
3DMark
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5226, n=208, last 2 years)
1717 Points +402%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
800 Points +134%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
615 Points +80%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
347 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (330 - 378, n=15)
346 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
342 Points
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (110 - 5248, n=204, last 2 years)
1718 Points +414%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
788 Points +136%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
623 Points +87%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (323 - 366, n=15)
338 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
337 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
334 Points
Wild Life Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3039 Points +150%
Average of class Smartphone
  (395 - 13896, n=136, last 2 years)
2646 Points +118%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2367 Points +95%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1165 - 1364, n=15)
1240 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1214 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1183 Points -3%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (394 - 20068, n=204, last 2 years)
6371 Points +421%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
3046 Points +149%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
2311 Points +89%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
1232 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1223 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1056 - 1340, n=15)
1205 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4683 Points +80%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4087 Points +57%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 7890, n=104, last 2 years)
2741 Points +6%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2600 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2471 - 2791, n=14)
2600 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2595 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4837 Points +100%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
3967 Points +64%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 9814, n=104, last 2 years)
2734 Points +13%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2326 - 2655, n=14)
2439 Points +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
2433 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2421 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
4534 Points +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
4215 Points +21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3471 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
3425 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3101 - 3471, n=14)
3362 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 4679, n=104, last 2 years)
3165 Points -9%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, Adreno 710, 8192
35379 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 89112, n=215, last 2 years)
33521 Points +65%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, Adreno 710, 8192
24583 Points +21%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (17228 - 25005, n=15)
20509 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
20319 Points
Motorola Moto G72
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 6144
18237 Points -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GHonor Magic6 LiteMotorola Moto G72Average 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-0%
29%
-12%
19%
33%
Sequential Read 256KB
933.8
946.8
1%
1827.3
96%
868.5
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
795.4
808.2
2%
843.34
6%
497.5
-37%
Random Read 4KB
246.8
239.2
-3%
223.75
-9%
231.4
-6%
292 ?(247 - 337, n=2)
18%
Random Write 4KB
222.2
220.5
-1%
271.22
22%
230.2
4%
306 ?(222 - 390, n=2)
38%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5GHonor Magic6 LiteAverage 512 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
PCMark for Android
-19%
9%
10%
31%
Storage 2.0 seq. read int.
819 ?(3.0.4061)
758 ?(3.0.4061)
-7%
Storage 2.0 seq. write int.
726 ?(3.0.4061)
776 ?(3.0.4061)
7%
818 ?(726 - 909, n=2)
13%
Storage 2.0 random read int.
45.4 ?(3.0.4061)
25.7 ?(3.0.4061)
-43%
48.2 ?(45.4 - 51, n=2)
6%
Storage 2.0 random write int.
67.7 ?(3.0.4061)
41.2 ?(3.0.4061)
-39%
Storage 2.0
26431 ?(3.0.4061)
23116 ?(3.0.4061)
-13%
28736
9%
Max. Load
 40.8 °C
105 F
35.7 °C
96 F
35 °C
95 F
 
 40.3 °C
105 F
37.2 °C
99 F
35 °C
95 F
 
 39.3 °C
103 F
36.8 °C
98 F
34.3 °C
94 F
 
Maximum: 40.8 °C = 105 F
Average: 37.2 °C = 99 F
33.8 °C
93 F
35.4 °C
96 F
37.2 °C
99 F
34.4 °C
94 F
37.2 °C
99 F
38.8 °C
102 F
33.3 °C
92 F
37.2 °C
99 F
38.3 °C
101 F
Maximum: 38.8 °C = 102 F
Average: 36.2 °C = 97 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.8 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 21 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.8 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.4 %
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.1 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.7 % +1%
Motorola Moto G72
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 % +1%
Honor Magic6 Lite
Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.9 %
0123456789101112131415161718Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.07 (2.06-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø4.75 (4.74-4.76)
Honor Magic6 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø3.68 (3.67-3.69)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.08 (2.08-2.09)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.44 (7.35-7.47)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G Adreno 710, SD 7s Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø18.1 (18.1-18.2)
Honor Magic6 Lite Adreno 710, SD 6 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.3 (14.3-14.3)
Motorola Moto G72 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø6.67 (6.59-6.79)
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Front
Heatmap Back
Heatmap Back
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2042.2382533.233.53127.126.54030.528.4503431.46325.823.4801717.910019.922.212525.427.316017.334.920010.639.725014.447.53158.149.94007.450.75007.860.4630961.180012.561.4100017.273.412509.47316001072.620009.867.8250010.362.331501162.340001265.9500012.670.9630013.572.7800014.4681000015.271.31250015.971.81600016.851.5SPL24.881.6N0.648.4median 12.5median 62.3Delta3.211.535.437.13839.725.828.727.427.930.232.228.929.618.822.716.32013.826.514.635.812.742.51748.810.15710.362.211.966.712.76713.769.114.174.115.576.31276.912.7771376.913.474.113.867.81564.515.461.916.267.817.76917.663.618.659.926.585.40.858.3median 13.8median 66.71.57.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4GMotorola Moto G72
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 67% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G72 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 9min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G
5100 mAh
Honor Magic6 Lite
5300 mAh
Motorola Moto G72
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3
969
1002
3%
906
-7%
929
-4%

Pros

+ attractive, sturdy housing
+ plenty of memory
+ bright AMOLED...
+ ... with 120 Hz and good color fidelity
+ 4 years of updates
+ flexible camera system
+ good speakers
+ fast charging

Cons

- no 5G
- no eSIM support
- no 4K video recording
- comparatively low processor performance
- PWM flickering
- many pre-installed apps

Verdict - Significant differences in equipment compared to the 5G model

In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G. Test device provided by:
In review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G. Test device provided by:
nbb.com

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a great mid-range phone, but it is somewhat overshadowed by its 5G brother. Although it has the same high-quality camera system, it has to do without maximum brightness. You also have to accept a lower screen resolution, the absence of 4K video recording, slower Wi-Fi, and no eSIM support. Apart from the fact that, as the name suggests, you can't use the 5G network and there are significant performance losses.

For a price difference of 50 euros, which can be put into perspective again depending on the retailer, that's quite a lot of cost-cutting measures that Xiaomi has taken. The Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G is definitely a strong competitor and you should consider paying a small premium for the many advantages.

On its own, however, our test device impresses with a stylish and very modern casing, fast charging, good runtimes, a bright and color-true screen, and good features. It is, therefore, also definitely a good buy. There are hardly any real weak points: The software, which is loaded with a lot of bloatware, is not a highlight and the PWM flickering of the screen could cause problems for sensitive people.

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G is a strong mid-range phone that has an even better-equipped competitor in the form of the 5G model.

If you want a different brand, you can check out the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Honor Magic6 Lite as both offer 5G and are already quite affordable after price reductions.

Price and availability

At the time of publishing, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G with 512 GB mass storage is available directly from the manufacturer. Alternatively, interested users can order the Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G via Amazon for around $270.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G - 05/03/2024 v7
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 70%
Weight
89%
Battery
91%
Display
92%
Games Performance
31 / 64 → 49%
Application Performance
70 / 86 → 81%
Temperature
91%
Noise
0%
Audio
64 / 90 → 71%
Camera
71%
Average
74%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.

Pricecompare

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G smartphone review - Midranger with AMOLED and good cameras
Florian Schmitt, 2024-05- 8 (Update: 2024-05- 8)