Notebookcheck Logo
Review: Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE smartphone review - More power and stamina

An affordable marathon-runner.

Xiaomi is in the process of launching a whole Note 14 series. The cheapest Redmi Note 14 is said to impress with its AI camera and large battery. It also comes with a 120 Hz AMOLED display, stereo speakers, memory expansion and an audio jack connector - and all for $200. Our review reveals if anything is left to be desired.
Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by Andrew Dickson) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Redmi Note 14 LTE verdict - A strong overall package that lacks sparkle

Xiaomi does many things right with the Redmi Note 14 LTE. The smartphone performs better than its predecessor, and the AMOLED display is bright and displays accurate colors. There is also an IR blaster, an audio jack connector and expandable storage. However, the crowning glory is the very good battery life.

Despite this, the camera left us with mixed feelings. In good lighting conditions, the main camera delivers usable results. Low-light performance, zoom and video quality, on the other hand, are rather mediocre. The images from the front camera also fall short of expectations.

The brief drops in the Wi-Fi connection during testing were annoying, but hopefully, this can be fixed with an update. We would also like to see a crisper vibration motor, a higher quality audio jack connector and a real always-on display.

Pros

+ storage expansion possible
+ 3.5 mm audio jack
+ very long battery life
+ many included extras
+ bright, color accurate AMOLED display

Cons

- low power reserves
- video quality
- Wi-Fi drops

Price and availability

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE's RRP is $200 for the smallest version, but an additional 2 GB of RAM will set you back an extra $30. The largest version comes with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB storage space and costs around $250.

However, at the time of this review, the prices in stores were already below the RRP.

Possible alternatives compared

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
73.4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $5.99
Natbok 2 Pack Compatible wit...
3. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
List Price: 250€
196 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
2.
81.5% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon: $184.63
List Price: 299€
181 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED
3.
80% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A15
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $5.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $6.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $3.99
Bencuku (2 Pack Designed for...
List Price: 190€
200 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"
2340x1080
396 PPI
Super AMOLED
4.
72.3%
Motorola Moto G35
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP4 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $3.57
Pusiikeer 2 Pack for Motorol...
2. $8.99
30W Fast Charger Block 2 Por...
3. $9.99
Fast Charger Type C 25W USB ...
List Price: 179€
188 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.72"
2400x1080
392 PPI
IPS
5.
80.2% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 610 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $287.50
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
2. $334.00
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 5G ...
3. $259.99
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro 4G ...
List Price: 199€
188.5 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.67"
2400x1080
395 PPI
AMOLED

With the Redmi 14, Xiaomi doesn't only offer a single smartphone but a whole series. In addition to the Note 14, there is a Note 14 Pro and a Note 14 Pro+. The Note 14 and Note 14 Pro are also available in 5G and LTE versions.

This review concerns the entry-level model, the Redmi Note 14 LTE. This device comes in differently specced variants. The basic smartphone packs 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of storage space. There is also the option of 8 GB of RAM with 128 or 256 GB of storage.

Three colors are available: Lime Green, Midnight Black and Ocean Blue. Our review model is black and has the largest storage configuration.

Specifications

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Redmi Note 14 Series)
Processor
Mediatek Helio G99 8 x 2 - 2.2 GHz, Cortex-A76 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 395 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 256 GB 
, 229 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Electronic compass, Gyroscope, IR-Blaster, OTG
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900MHz), 3G (Band 1/ 5/ 8), 4G (Band 1/ 3/ 5/ 7/ 8/ 20/ 28/ 38/ 40/ 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.16 x 164.84 x 78.15 ( = 0.32 x 6.49 x 3.08 in)
Battery
5500 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix f/1,7, 1/1,67" Sensorsize; 2 MPix macro; 2 MPix depth
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix f/2,2, 1/4" Sensorsize
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: onscreen, USB-C-Cable, power suply unit, HyperOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, IP54, GNSS: GPS (L1), Galileo (E1); Glonass (G1); BDS (B1); Camera2API: Level 3; IP54; Bluetooth-Codescs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC V1/V2/V3/V4/V5.; SNR 77,25 dBFS; HDR10; SAR-Head: 0.99 W/kg, SAR-Body: 0.97 W/kg, fanless
Weight
196 g ( = 6.91 oz / 0.43 pounds), Power Supply: 106 g ( = 3.74 oz / 0.23 pounds)
Price
250 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case - The Redmi Note 14 comes with IP certification

Redmi uses a plastic back for its Note 14, and the frame is made of an aluminum alloy. The display is protected by Corning Gorilla Glass 5. There is even IP certification on board, albeit only IP54.

The build quality is impressive: gaps are small and even, and the smartphone is not only sturdy but is also difficult to bend even when force is applied. The frame and rear are matte and relatively resistant to fingerprints. Only the glass-like element around the three lenses is a real dust magnet.

Size comparison

166.3 mm / 6.55 in 76 mm / 2.99 in 7.8 mm / 0.3071 in 188 g0.4145 lbs164.84 mm / 6.49 in 78.15 mm / 3.08 in 8.16 mm / 0.3213 in 196 g0.4321 lbs162.2 mm / 6.39 in 75.6 mm / 2.98 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 188.5 g0.4156 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 74.95 mm / 2.95 in 7.98 mm / 0.3142 in 181 g0.399 lbs160.1 mm / 6.3 in 76.8 mm / 3.02 in 8.4 mm / 0.3307 in 200 g0.4409 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features - Redmi offers an audio jack and microSD

Xiaomi advertizes the Redmi Note 14 as having a 108 MPix camera, a 5500 mAh battery and a refresh rate of 120 Hz. The smartphone also offers features such as a 3.5 mm audio jack, NFC, an IR blaster and memory expansion via a microSD card in a hybrid slot.

The USB-C port only supports USB 2.0, but exFAT and NTFS are supported as file systems for external data storage devices. In our tests, we measured a transfer speed of 24.7 MB/s when paired with a Samsung 980 Pro SSD.

microSD Card Reader - Redmi expands up to 1 TB

The Redmi Note 14's internal storage can be expanded using a microSD card. The Redmi 14 can accommodate memory cards of up to 1 TB, and in our test, we used the AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60 as a reference card.

From three measurements, we achieved an average transfer speed of 24.7 MB/s. This puts the Note 14 on par with its predecessor. The Samsung Galaxy A15 proves that you can go significantly faster in this class, with a transfer speed that is almost twice as high.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
42.6 MB/s +72%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760) (Angelbird V60)
36.4 MB/s +47%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=77, last 2 years)
30.3 MB/s +23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
24.7 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G (Angelbird V60)
24.3 MB/s -2%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
22.1 MB/s -11%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø37.4 (26.8-49.4)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø26.5 (17.2-40)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø73.6 (47.7-81.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (18.4-82.5)

Software - HyperOS is on the Redmi Note 14

The Redmi Note 14 comes with Android 14 and Xiaomi's HyperOS 1.0. At the time of reviewing, the security patch is from November 2024. There is no uniform update policy for the Note 14 series. Surprisingly, the cheapest Redmi Note 14 gets the longest support: The Redmi Note 14 will receive four years of OS updates and six years of security updates.

The HyperOS offers a variety of settings options. However, the device also comes with a ton of bloatware. In addition to numerous Xiaomi and Google apps, there is also software from Microsoft, game providers and third-party providers such as TikToc, Facebook, Alibaba, Booking and many more. With the exception of the Xiaomi apps, all programs can be easily deleted.

Sustainability - The Redmi Note 14 has a long shelflife

Xiaomi hasn't provided any information regarding the Redmi Note 14's carbon footprint. The device comes with packaging containing very little plastic, and the manufacturer advertizes the smartphone as being particularly durable. Xiaomi aims to achieve this through robust construction, using materials such as absorbent foam elements and reinforced corners.

Xiaomi promises a battery life of 4 years, which is said to be achieved through intelligent charging management.

Communication and GNSS - The Note 14 experiences small interruptions

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 only supports Wi-Fi 5. In our tests, it achieved transfer speeds that are typical for its class when paired with our reference router, an Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000.

In the recorded measurements, the transmission was stable, and there were no drops. In everyday use, however, it is noticeable that the Redmi Note 14 often loses the Wi-Fi connection for a few seconds while other devices manage to remain connected to the network.

When it comes to mobile data, the device is unremarkable, but in our test, he transmission was stable. The cheapest model in the Note 14 series is not 5G-capable. In addition, the band coverage is relatively low, but all European-relevant bands are supported.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=189, last 2 years)
725 MBit/s +98%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
367 (185min - 378max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (336min - 382max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy A15
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (352min - 375max) MBit/s -1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
357 (59min - 385max) MBit/s -3%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=196)
349 MBit/s -5%
Motorola Moto G35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
304 (268min - 311max) MBit/s -17%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=187, last 2 years)
707 MBit/s +85%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
390 (366min - 387max) MBit/s +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
382 (365min - 387max) MBit/s
Motorola Moto G35
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
331 (302min - 349max) MBit/s -13%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=195)
328 MBit/s -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
317 (293min - 339max) MBit/s -17%
Samsung Galaxy A15
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
285 (259min - 304max) MBit/s -25%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø361 (185-378)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø364 (336-382)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø375 (365-387)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø316 (293-339)
GNSS measurement: Outdoors
GNSS measurement: Outdoors
GNSS measurement: Indoors
GNSS measurement: Indoors

The Redmi Note 14 supports single-band GNSS connections. Indoors, the smartphone needs a few seconds to establish a connection. In outdoor areas, the satellite connection is much faster, and positioning is more accurate.

The fact that the Redmi Note 14 does not enjoy very precise orientation becomes clear in a comparison trip with a Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch. In this comparison, the Xiaomi device's measured distance was some 200 meters shorter. The routes are often not displayed correctly. Navigation in everyday life - for example, with Google Maps - is still straightforward with the Note 14.

GNSS measurement: Pond
GNSS measurement: Pond
GNSS measurement: Paths
GNSS measurement: Paths
GNSS measurement: Summary
GNSS measurement: Summary

Telephone functions and voice quality - The Redmi Note 14 is somewhat tinny

Xiaomi's Redmi Note 14 uses the Google telephone app. The software is uncluttered and poses no puzzles to the user. The quality of calls is fine, but the earpiece makes the other person's voice sound a bit tinny. Background noise could also be suppressed better, but interference is absent.

When making calls via the speaker, the device is loud enough.

Cameras - Videos are not one of the Redmi Note 14's strengths

A selfie with the Redmi Note 14
A selfie with the Redmi Note 14

Although Xiaomi has installed three lenses in the Redmi Note 14, only the 108 MPix main camera should really be taken seriously. The other two lenses have just 2 MPix each; one is intended for macro shots, and the other provides information on depth of field. The macro shots are very noisy and only work in very good lighting conditions. There is no ultra-wide-angle lens, and only digital zooming is available.

The quality of the main camera, on the other hand, is mostly impressive. The shots are sharp and processed quickly. By comparison, however, the colors are rather pale. The digital zoom is fine, but the dynamic range continues to decrease, and the subjects blur a little. If desired, photos can be taken at full resolution. There is also a Pro mode with which the white balance, focus, exposure time and ISO can be set manually.

The shots from the 20 MPix front camera lack sharpness. The images sometimes appear soft and washed out. The portrait mode, however, works reliably. The Redmi Note 14 records videos at a maximum resolution of 1080p and 60fps, while only 30fps is possible on the front.

The video quality is mediocre, and due to the lack of stabilization, a steady hand is required. Exposure correction and autofocus work quite well. However, in our test, even short videos showed image errors and stuttering in the recordings.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

RabbitPond5x ZoomLow light
ColorChecker
9.7 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
4 ∆E
4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE: 7.86 ∆E min: 3.73 - max: 16.17 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.7 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.3 ∆E
76.6 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE: 47.1 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.71 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - The Redmi Note 14 comes with a case and power adapter

Fortunately, out of the box, the Redmi Note 14 comes with a well-applied screen protector. A case and a 33-watt charger are also included. In Germany, Xiaomi offers a 12-month guarantee with its Redmi Note 14.

Anyone who purchases the smartphone by February 11, 2025, will also receive a free repair or a defective display replacement from Xiaomi during the first six months of ownership - even if the phone owner is at fault. 

Input devices & operation - Quick unlocking with the Redmi Note 14

The Redmi Note 14 has a flat display, meaning the applied screen protector does not interfere with inputs on the display edges and also did not come off during the test period. Inputs are reliably recognized in all areas of the display.

Out of the box, Xiaomi uses Gboard as its keyboard. This means that typing was reliable in our tests. Only the ERM vibration motor somewhat spoils the input experience. It works clearly and audibly, but the haptic feedback is spongy.

The unlocking made a positive impression. The Redmi Note 14 can be unlocked using 2D facial recognition or an in-display fingerprint reader. Both variants work quickly and reliably. However, the fingerprint reader is installed far too low in the display.

Display - 120 Hz and AMOLED in the Redmi Note 14

Subpixel image
Subpixel image

The Redmi Note 14 uses a 6.67-inch AMOLED panel. The maximum refresh rate is 120 Hz. The software takes care of the automatic adjustment ex-works. If desired, this value can also be set to either 60 or 120 Hz. According to the DRM information, there is only one further intermediate step at 90 Hz.

In our test, we measured a maximum brightness of 1,176 cd/m² with the ambient light sensor activated. This makes the panel a little brighter than that of its predecessor. Compared to similar devices, the Redmi Note 14 does well. In addition, the display is evenly illuminated. With our HDR measurement, we achieved the promised brightness of 1,800 cd/m² (APL18: 1,734 cd/m²).

Without the ambient light sensor, we achieved a brightness of 470 nits. During the measurements, we also noticed screen flickering at two different frequencies, one being OLED flickering and the other PWM, but with a high frequency of 980 Hz.

In the Xiaomi Redmi Note 14's settings, there is an "always-on-display" option. However, this is not a real always-on display. The display can be customized, but it switches off after a few minutes of inactivity.

1172
cd/m²
1161
cd/m²
1176
cd/m²
1169
cd/m²
1164
cd/m²
1173
cd/m²
1173
cd/m²
1159
cd/m²
1170
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1176 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1168.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.81 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 99 %
Center on Battery: 1164 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A15
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G35
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
1%
-39%
-81%
-6%
Brightness middle
1164
1016
-13%
731
-37%
1069
-8%
940
-19%
Brightness
1169
1016
-13%
711
-39%
976
-17%
922
-21%
Brightness Distribution
99
94
-5%
93
-6%
88
-11%
96
-3%
Black Level *
0.7
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
1.1
15%
2.31
-78%
3.32
-155%
1.2
8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.5
1.9
24%
3.51
-40%
5.48
-119%
2.28
9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.3
1.3
-0%
1.7
-31%
3.6
-177%
1.4
-8%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.28 96%
2.091 105%
2.167 102%
2.27 97%
CCT
6531 100%
6420 101%
6424 101%
6141 106%
6503 100%
Contrast
1527

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.71 %
Secondary Frequency: 980 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8564 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

A series of measurement with fixed zoom levels and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness can be seen in the info box.)

The Note 14 display's color balance is well implemented. In addition, the smartphone covers the sRGB color space to 99.9 percent in Calman 2D measurements. The display's color reproduction can be customized in the settings.

Color accuracy (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color accuracy (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color space (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Gray scales (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Gray scales (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (color scheme Standard, color temperature Standard, target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.782 ms rise
↘ 0.6875 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.98 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.032 ms rise
↘ 0.9475 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

In everyday situations, content can be read even in sunlight, although extra brightness reserves would be preferable. Content can be difficult to make out, especially from wider viewing angles.

The Redmi Note 14's AMOLED display has stable viewing angles. Although the brightness decreases when viewed from the side, the content is still visible, and the colors do not change.

Performance - The Redmi Note 14 is class average

Xiaomi no longer uses a Snapdragon CPU for its Redmi Note 14 but a MediaTek Helio G99. As the benchmark measurements show, this is a significant upgrade over the Snapdragon 685 4G found in the Redmi Note 13.

The chip might not be new, but it is also installed in other devices in this segment, such as the Poco M6 Pro or the Samsung Galaxy A15, which have both been on the market for some time now. As you would expect, these devices perform similarly to one another.

In everyday use, the Redmi Note 14 usually runs smoothly. However, with more demanding apps or many tasks running in parallel, stutters are present.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=189, last 2 years)
1502 Points +113%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
738 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
730 Points +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
728 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (705 - 738, n=12)
726 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
705 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
478 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=189, last 2 years)
4256 Points +119%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
2168 Points +11%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1994 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1864 - 2065, n=12)
1984 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1946 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1942 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1544 Points -21%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=169, last 2 years)
1073 Points +97%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
552 Points +1%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
551 Points +1%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (490 - 576, n=18)
547 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
544 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
437 Points -20%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=169, last 2 years)
3605 Points +98%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1903 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1879 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1670 - 1981, n=18)
1828 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1818 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1775 Points -2%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=124, last 2 years)
1310811 Points +210%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
422936 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
421861 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (383511 - 422936, n=6)
404332 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
391170 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
352825 Points -17%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=194, last 2 years)
13566 Points +28%
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
12187 Points +15%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
10603 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
10563 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (8885 - 11379, n=18)
9931 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
9195 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
7305 Points -31%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=165, last 2 years)
956 Points +68%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
570 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
568 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (526 - 602, n=11)
565 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
526 Points -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
369 Points -35%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)
6608 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3076 Points +5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3041 Points +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2855 - 3120, n=11)
3000 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2941 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2728 Points -7%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)
10420 Points +68%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6743 Points +9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
6320 Points +2%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (5261 - 6776, n=11)
6228 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
6208 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
6208 Points
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7221 Points +107%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (3454 - 4152, n=11)
3739 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
3732 Points +7%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
3636 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
3493 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
3285 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
18693 Points +555%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
2959 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2856 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (2683 - 3002, n=11)
2804 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
2798 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
2331 Points -18%
Web
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1592 Points +32%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
1306 Points +8%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (1150 - 1325, n=11)
1248 Points +3%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
1247 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1208 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
1144 Points -5%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
18072 Points +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9197 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 12288
9164 Points 0%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (6323 - 9695, n=10)
8646 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
6323 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
4615 Points -50%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
27025 Points +3110%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 4096
920 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (842 - 982, n=9)
901 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
842 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G, Adreno 610, 8192
382 Points -55%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years)
764 Points
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
366 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years)
3546 Points
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
358 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years)
5123 Points
Motorola Moto G35
Unisoc T8100 (T760), Mali-G57 MP4, 4096
145 Points
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=33, last 2 years)
4033 Points +5753%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
68.9 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G99
  (n=1)
68.9 Points 0%

For its Redmi Note 14's graphics chip, Xiaomi uses a Mali-G57 MP2, and this is the same one put to use in the Poco M6 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy A15 4G. As expected, the results in the benchmarks are, therefore, very similar. However, the Motorola Moto G35 sets itself apart with its Mali-G57 MP4.

The graphics performance is sufficient to play even demanding games like PUBG Mobile quite smoothly in HD.

There are no surprises in the browser benchmarks and memory measurements. The Redmi Note 14's scores are class-typical, performing slightly better than its predecessor.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
434 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
335 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
326 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
135 Points -59%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
443 Points +28%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
345 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
332 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
139 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1599 Points +33%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1221 Points +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1202 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1094 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
634 Points -47%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1614 Points +31%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1233 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1230 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1195 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
645 Points -48%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132.5 (0.982min - 0.982max) Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 Points 0%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4186 Points +20%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3652 Points +4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3501 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3329 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2739 Points -22%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3016 Points +24%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2440 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2434 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2411 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1427 Points -41%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3216 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2634 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2611 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2568 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1597 Points -39%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +2%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
55 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
63 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps -29%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
37 fps +3%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
36 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -39%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +4%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
25 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -36%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps -8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.7 fps -41%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps +31%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.9 fps +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.4 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.3 fps -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
7.6 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.5 fps
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.4 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps -35%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +14%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -29%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.3 fps +38%
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.5 fps +4%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.4 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1.5 fps -37%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
130.3 Points +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
77.9 Points
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
74.154 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
73.5 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (46.9 - 80.9, n=10)
67.6 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
62.375 Points -20%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
155.5 runs/min +96%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
79.3 runs/min
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
65.46 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
60.4 runs/min -24%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (24.1 - 80.7, n=10)
55.2 runs/min -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
52.4 runs/min -34%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
122.3 Points +47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (Chrome 132)
83 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (Chrome 122)
81 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
78 Points -6%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (39 - 89, n=10)
70.9 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
49 Points -41%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years)
40624 Points +70%
Motorola Moto G35 (Chrome 128)
25440 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
23896 Points
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
22678 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
21890 Points -8%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (17228 - 25005, n=18)
21160 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
15900 Points -33%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G (Chrome 120)
2534.6 ms * -45%
Average Mediatek Helio G99 (1671 - 2444, n=10)
2026 ms * -16%
Samsung Galaxy A15 (Chrome 122)
2009.6 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro (chrome 122)
1932.3 ms * -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE (chrome 132)
1742.5 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)
1469 ms * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTEXiaomi Poco M6 ProSamsung Galaxy A15Motorola Moto G35Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4GAverage 256 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
8%
-5%
22%
-10%
1%
70%
Sequential Read 256KB
980.55
973.53
-1%
967.8
-1%
989.3
1%
909.8
-7%
Sequential Write 256KB
835.49
910.9
9%
488.5
-42%
860.3
3%
606.3
-27%
721 ?(369 - 913, n=39)
-14%
Random Read 4KB
202.22
236.72
17%
233.2
15%
272.1
35%
177.1
-12%
Random Write 4KB
213.23
228.61
7%
229.6
8%
318.9
50%
228
7%

Emissions - The Note 14 gets loud but stays cool

Temperature - The Note 14 isn't hot-headed

In everyday life, the Redmi Note 14's temperatures always remain low. Even when gaming, the device barely heats up. Under extreme load - in the Burnout benchmark - we reached a maximum temperature of 38.2 degrees Celsius on the upper side of the device.

Max. Load
 38.2 °C
101 F
36.1 °C
97 F
32.9 °C
91 F
 
 37.2 °C
99 F
36.2 °C
97 F
32.5 °C
91 F
 
 35.9 °C
97 F
34.6 °C
94 F
32 °C
90 F
 
Maximum: 38.2 °C = 101 F
Average: 35.1 °C = 95 F
32.4 °C
90 F
34.2 °C
94 F
33.9 °C
93 F
31.2 °C
88 F
33.2 °C
92 F
34.4 °C
94 F
29.8 °C
86 F
33.9 °C
93 F
34.3 °C
94 F
Maximum: 34.4 °C = 94 F
Average: 33 °C = 91 F
Power Supply (max.)  29.4 °C = 85 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.1 % -1%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.3 % +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.7 % +2%
Motorola Moto G35
Mali-G57 MP4, T8100 (T760), 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.6 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
96.7 %
Samsung Galaxy A15
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
95.6 % -1%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.5 %
01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.04 (2.01-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.814 (0.81-0.82)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.42 (7.39-7.44)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Adreno 610, SD 685, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.91 (3.89-3.93)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø0.995 (0.979-1.004)

Speakers - The Redmi is significantly better than the predecessor

The Xiaomi Radmi Note 14 has stereo speakers with the sound being emitted both to the front via the earpiece and upward, at the top of the phone. Even at full volume, no vibrations are present either on the frame or the rear.

Compared to its predecessor, the maximum volume has increased significantly. The mids are also nice and linear. However, even for a smartphone, there is a complete lack of bass and low frequencies. Xiaomi has fitted its Redmi Note 14 with a 3.5 mm audio jack connector. This has a signal-to-noise ratio of 77.25 dBFS, which is decent but not good.

In our tests, the smartphone connected easily to various Bluetooth headphones. The following standards are supported: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, LDAC, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LHDC V1/V2/V3/V4/V5.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203339.22527.536.73122.834.34026.337.15036.442.86321.1378020.735.110019.63512512.637.916016.342.520016.344.425013.150.131512.454.6400105650010.864.463012.467.780011.969.1100011.675.6125012.479.7160011.678.2200011.378.8250011.978.6315012.180.3400013.181.9500013.182.5630013.779.9800013.375.81000013.672.21250013.771.41600014.269.3SPL24.690.7N0.681.1median 12.6median 72.2Delta1.111.937.238.530.332.924.123.831.429.137.334.625.928.519.520.116.52713.731.113.736.29.2368.337.16.742.4749.18.854.88.358.18.964.610.765.78.767.19.164.99.765.710.661.811.353.21260.212.961.313.768.614.467.615.360.31657.91757.423.976.20.535.7median 10.7median 58.12.711.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTEXiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery runtimes - The Redmi Note 14 has staying power

Power consumption

In its Redmi Note 14, Xiaomi has tuned the MediaTek Helio G99 differently compared to the Poco M6 Pro. Under load, the Redmi's power consumption is lower. The Redmi Note 14 is also more economical than the previous year's Note 13.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.08 / 0.16 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.05 / 1.27 / 1.31 Watt
Load midlight 3.12 / 6.24 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
5500 mAh
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G99
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-21%
3%
-12%
-35%
-41%
Idle Minimum *
1.05
1
5%
1.1
-5%
1.1
-5%
1.038 ?(0.7 - 1.9, n=10)
1%
Idle Average *
1.27
1.19
6%
1.2
6%
1.3
-2%
1.852 ?(1.1 - 4.02, n=10)
-46%
Idle Maximum *
1.31
1.33
-2%
1.5
-15%
1.5
-15%
2.07 ?(1.31 - 4.07, n=10)
-58%
Load Average *
3.12
6.27
-101%
2.9
7%
3.6
-15%
4.91 ?(2.9 - 7.49, n=10)
-57%
Load Maximum *
6.24
7.19
-15%
4.8
23%
7.8
-25%
7.24 ?(4.8 - 10.2, n=10)
-16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.52 (1.164-4.6)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.73 (1.11-7.79)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.976 (0.912-1.261)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.71.92.12.42.62.83.13.33.53.844.34.5Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø2.36 (2.17-2.76)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.36 (3.15-4.73)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE Mediatek Helio G99; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.976 (0.912-1.261)
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.326 (1.144-3.09)

Battery life - The Redmi Note 14 is a long distance runner

With the Redmi Note 14, Xiaomi has combined an economical processor with an AMOLED display and a large 5,500 mAh battery. Overall, we achieved very good runtimes. In our practical Wi-Fi internet surfing test, the Redmi Note 14 kept going for over 17.5 hours before it had to be recharged.

In everyday life, two days of use are not a problem. Even when gaming, the smartphone easily lasts a day without recharging. With the included 33-watt power adapter, the Redmi Note 14 can be charged from 10 to 60 percent in 35 minutes and from 10 to 90 percent in 60 minutes.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 38min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE
5500 mAh
1058 min
Xiaomi Poco M6 Pro
5000 mAh
845 min
Samsung Galaxy A15
5000 mAh
885 min
Motorola Moto G35
5000 mAh
1001 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G
5000 mAh
742 min

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 is good but not a high-flyer in its class. The performance is better than its predecessor and now also competitive. However, the Note 14 is still not really a high-performing device. The Redmi smartphone doesn't make any mistakes, but, except for the battery life, it also lacks a bit of shine.

The Redmi Note 14 is a coherent overall package. Features, workmanship, and the included extras are impressive, especially concerning the price. For more demanding customers, the manufacturer also offers the Note 14 5G, Note 14 Pro, Note 14 Pro 5G and Note 14 Pro+ 5G.

Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE - 02/10/2025 v8
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
88%
Connectivity
42 / 69 → 61%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
90%
Games Performance
5 / 55 → 9%
Application Performance
54 / 85 → 63%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
57%
Average
60%
73%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.7%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
89%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 45.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 LTE smartphone review - More power and stamina
Benedikt Winkel, 2025-02-13 (Update: 2025-02-14)