Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image Source: Manuel Masiero)

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Smartphone Review: Dimensity 8400-Ultra debut with software updates until 2029 for under €400

Great equipment, low price.

The inexpensive Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro makes other mid-range smartphones look pale in comparison. For well under €400 (~$420), the Poco X7 Pro debuts the new MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra that offers brute performance on a par with a 2024 flagship, a 120 Hz AMOLED display, and an above-average battery life. However, buyers should also be aware of a few disadvantages.
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict: A lot of premium in a mid-range smartphone

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro is the right smartphone for buyers who want to spend little but are not prepared to accept major compromises in terms of features and performance.

You have to do without features such as a full always-on display, eSIM support, and wireless charging. Nevertheless, the rest of the technology does not need to shy away from comparison with upper-class phones.

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro's strength particularly lies in its MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra SoC, which not only handles everyday tasks effortlessly but also runs complex games without frame rate drops.

It also has a 120 Hz AMOLED panel that offers four-digit peak brightness levels, a long battery life, and Android updates until 2029. The dual camera takes solid photos, and the black and yellow faux leather version of the high-quality build offers a good grip.

Pros

+ Top-class performance
+ bright AMOLED panel with 120 Hz
+ Bluetooth 5.4 and WiFi 6
+ decent photos in daylight
+ good battery life
+ Android-Updates for 4 years
+ Stereo speakers
+ IP68 certification

Cons

- no eSIM support
- no microSD slot
- no full always-on display
- no 3.5 mm headphone jack
- no wireless charging
- no power adapter included in the scope of delivery
- Bloatware and advertising in apps

Price and availability

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro starts from €370 at the Xiaomi online store for the 8 GB / 256 GB variant while the tested 12 GB / 512 GB SKU will set you back by €430.

It is possible to find the top-end Poco X7 Pro variant retailing closer to €400 on Amazon.

Amazon Logo
$7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 5G Screen Protector with Camera Lens Protector, 9H Hardness Anti-Scratch Tempered Glass flim, Case Friendly, Anti-Fingerprint,Anti-Scratch (2+2 PACK)
  • $6.59
    Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro/Poco M6 Pro 4G/Poco F6 Pro Screen Protector Tempered glass film.Anti-Breakage.Anti-Scratch No Bubbles 9H Hardness.Easy Installation for Poco X7 Pro
  • $6.99
    Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Screen Protector(2 pack) Tempered Glass flim with case,9H Hardness,Anti-Scratch, Case Friendly, Bubble Free,HD Clear

Possible competitors in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
80.9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G720 MP7 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $7.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
2. $6.59
Anoowkoa 3 Pack Designed for...
3. $6.99
Suttkue for Xiaomi Poco X7 P...
List Price: 430€
198 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED
2.
81.9%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $395.01
List Price: 549€
188 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"
2400x1080
431 PPI
AMOLED
3.
77.3%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP2 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $7.82
Pusiikeer 2 Pack for Motorol...
3. $8.99
Iiseon High Sensitivity Hydr...
List Price: 499€
171 g512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"
2670x1220
459 PPI
P-OLED
4.
86.9% v7 (old)
Nothing Phone (2a)
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 ⎘
ARM Mali-G610 MP4 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $6.95
Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...
2. $5.99
Supershieldz (2 Pack) Design...
3. $11.99
Ibywind 2 Pack Screen Protec...
List Price: 329€
190 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"
2412x1084
394 PPI
AMOLED
5.
87.4% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 530 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $449.99
SAMSUNG Galaxy A54 5G A Seri...
2. $6.99
JETech Screen Protector for ...
3. $9.99
Samsung Galaxy A55/A35 5G Sc...
List Price: 529€
213 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.60"
2340x1080
390 PPI
Super AMOLED
6.
86.1% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G615 MP6 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon: $329.99
List Price: 420€
186 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"
2712x1220
446 PPI
AMOLED

Xiaomi offers affordable smartphones characterized by a good price-performance ratio under its subsidiary brand Poco. The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro is no exception, as the base variant with 8 GB RAM and 256 GB storage priced at €370 (~$390) delivers performance that would have secured it a place among last year's flagship smartphones.

For price-conscious buyers, the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro makes for an appealing choice. This is exactly what we already attested to with the Poco X6 Pro which proved to be one of the best smartphones in its price range back in the day.

The Poco X7 Pro not only surpasses its predecessor in terms of performance but also offers enhanced features and a longer warranty period.

Specifications

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Poco X7 Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 8 x 2.1 - 3.3 GHz, Cortex-A725
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X; also available with 8 GB RAM
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 480 Hz touch sampling rate, 2560 instant touch sampling rate (only with Game Turbo mode on), 3200 nits peak brightness, Corning Gorilla Glass 7i, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz, Adaptive Sync
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 456 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Accelerometer, Flicker Senor, Electronic compass, IR blaster, Gyroscope, X-axis linear vibration motor, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (Band 2/3/5/8), 3G (Band 1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (Band 1/2/3/4/5/7/8/18/19/20/26/28/38/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (Band 1/2/3/5/7/8/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.43 x 160.75 x 75.24 ( = 0.33 x 6.33 x 2.96 in)
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.5, 26mm, OIS) + 8MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 15mm), video recording up to 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix OV20B, f/2.2, 25mm, video recording up to 1080p@30fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: virtual, USB-C cable, SIM tool, Protective case, Safety information, Quick start guide, Warranty card, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, HDR-Support: HDR10, HDR10+, HLG, Dolby Vision, Head SAR 0.995 W/kg, Body SAR 0.995 W/kg, fanless, waterproof
Weight
198 g ( = 6.98 oz / 0.44 pounds), Power Supply: 100 g ( = 3.53 oz / 0.22 pounds)
Price
430 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Build: Faux leather and Iron Man Edition on offer

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro's high-quality plastic build sports a flat and angular design with rounded corners. Weighing 198 g (195 g for the plastic back cover), the smartphone sits in the hand with a comfortable grip.

The Poco X7 Pro is waterproof and dustproof, thanks to its IP68 certification. The AMOLED panel is further protected by Gorilla Glass 7i and, according to Corning, is slated to withstand a fall from a height of one meter onto asphalt-like surfaces without damage. The smartphone withstood all attempts at denting or twist during testing.

The Poco X7 Pro's 8.9 mm back cover comes in a smooth plastic or artificial leather finish, depending on the color variant. The former is available to those who opt for the black or green color options.

We tested the most attention-grabbing "regular" variant. The yellow and black faux leather version not only stands out with its high-contrast coloring but also offers a much better grip thanks to its non-slippery surface.

A unique red Iron Man Edition can be found exclusively in the Xiaomi store.

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro in the Yellow color variant (Image source: Xiaomi)
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro in the Black color variant (Image source: Xiaomi)
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro in the Green color variant (Image source: Xiaomi)
The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro in the Iron Man Edition Red (Image source: Xiaomi)

Size comparison

161.74 mm / 6.37 in 76.32 mm / 3 in 8.55 mm / 0.3366 in 190 g0.4189 lbs161.1 mm / 6.34 in 77.4 mm / 3.05 in 8.2 mm / 0.3228 in 213 g0.4696 lbs160.75 mm / 6.33 in 75.24 mm / 2.96 in 8.43 mm / 0.3319 in 198 g0.4365 lbs160.45 mm / 6.32 in 74.34 mm / 2.93 in 8.25 mm / 0.3248 in 186 g0.4101 lbs154.1 mm / 6.07 in 71.2 mm / 2.8 in 8.1 mm / 0.3189 in 171 g0.377 lbs152.2 mm / 5.99 in 72.7 mm / 2.86 in 8.9 mm / 0.3504 in 188 g0.4145 lbs148 mm / 5.83 in 105 mm / 4.13 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 1.5 g0.00331 lbs

Features: Poco X7 Pro with up to 12 GB RAM and 512 GB storage

Xiaomi offers the Poco X7 Pro in three memory variants listed below. They are equipped with UFS 4.0 memory and LPDDR5x RAM, offering more performance than usual in this price range. The Iron Man Edition comes only in a 12 GB RAM and 512 GB storage option.

  • 8/256 GB: €370
  • 12/256 GB: €400
  • 12/512 GB: €430

The rest of the features are solid, but it becomes quickly evident that the Poco X7 Pro maintains a respectful distance from higher-end models, such as the Xiaomi 15 series.

For instance, there is no notification LED, and the always-on display remains active for just 10 seconds after tapping the screen. eSIMs are not supported by the Xiaomi phone. There is also no option to expand the memory via microSD card nor is there a 3.5 mm headphone jack.

The OTG-capable USB-C port operates only at USB 2.0 speeds but still manages to transfer a very respectable 47.7 MB/s with our external Samsung 980 Pro test SSD. This is above the typical USB 2.0 performance, which barely goes any higher than 30 MB/s.

Left: No connections (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Left: No connections (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Right: Power button, volume rocker (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Right: Power button, volume rocker (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Top: Microphone, IR blaster, loudspeaker (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Top: Microphone, IR blaster, loudspeaker (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Bottom: SIM slot, USB-C 2.0, microphone, speakers (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Bottom: SIM slot, USB-C 2.0, microphone, speakers (Image source: Manuel Masiero)

Software: HyperOS 2.0 with 4-year software updates

The Poco X7 Pro comes with Xiaomi's in-house HyperOS 2.0 operating system, which is based on Android 15 in the case of our review sample. Compared to the first HyperOS edition, practically nothing has changed externally, so new users should be able find their way around straight away.

Xiaomi does not provide any information on how long the Poco X7 Pro will be supplied with OS upgrades and security updates. In the Xiaomi Security Center, where this information is normally found, the smartphone is not listed at the time of testing.

However, current Redmi smartphones now receive three OS upgrades and four years of security updates, so you can expect something similar for the Poco X7 Pro. Software support should therefore be available until 2029.

HyperOS 2.0 brings more personalization options for the lock screen and also offers AI features, including the removal of unwanted objects from images. Google Gemini serves as an AI language assistant and further AI tools such as website summaries, image generation or translations are available via the Mi Browser.

Unfortunately, the Poco X7 Pro also has the habit of displaying advertisements in its system apps, which is familiar from other Xiaomi smartphones. Turning the ads off requires some configuration effort.

Xiaomi also loads its smartphone with a lot of bloatware, which reduces the free storage on our test device from a nominal 512 GB to 456 GB. That being said, the inbox apps can be deleted without any problems.

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro

Sustainability

Xiaomi does not provide any precise information about the proportion of recycled materials used in its smartphones. However, according to the manufacturer, the amount of recycled aluminum, gold and copper has been increased for smartphone components.

The company also aims to keep its own ecological footprint as small as possible through measures such as the production of plastic material from discarded fishing nets and via trade-in programs.

Communication and GNSS: Equipped with Bluetooth 5.4 and Wi-Fi 6

Although the Poco X7 Pro is not a "world phone", it supports numerous mobile phone frequencies, which means you should usually get a signal even abroad.

Like its predecessor, the Poco X7 Pro also relies on NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, and Wi-Fi 6. Though we would have liked to see more modern Wi-Fi standards, the communication features are already above average for this price range.

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro cannot use the 6 GHz band but can still deliver a solid Wi-Fi performance with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router.

Data transfers reach up to 965 MB/s and are very stable in both the send and receive directions. The transfer rates are generally slightly above the data throughput of the comparison devices.

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
965 (877min - 991max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (305 - 1757, n=129)
861 MBit/s -11%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
856 (450min - 907max) MBit/s -11%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
812 (583min - 959max) MBit/s -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
762 (640min - 836max) MBit/s -21%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
735 (671min - 791max) MBit/s -24%
Average of class Smartphone
  (49.8 - 1806, n=186, last 2 years)
720 MBit/s -25%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
680 (417min - 860max) MBit/s -30%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
939 (843min - 960max) MBit/s +4%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
899 (822min - 924max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
861 (451min - 914max) MBit/s -4%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
834 (780min - 855max) MBit/s -7%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (234 - 1696, n=127)
825 MBit/s -8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
823 (704min - 841max) MBit/s -8%
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
782 (633min - 873max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (52 - 1857, n=184, last 2 years)
702 MBit/s -22%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (521 - 1945, n=80, last 2 years)
1437 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (614 - 1902, n=20)
1286 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
872 (464min - 957max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
521 (418min - 644max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Average of class Smartphone
  (451 - 1864, n=80, last 2 years)
1367 MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
  (666 - 1816, n=22)
1202 MBit/s
Nothing Phone (2a)
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
914 (902min - 925max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
754 (611min - 828max) MBit/s
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø965 (877-991)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø735 (671-791)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø897 (822-924)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø822 (704-841)
GPS reception in the building
GPS reception in the building
GPS reception outdoors
GPS reception outdoors

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro supports all common satellite navigation services. It does not record the route of our approximately 4 km walk quite as accurately as our Garmin Venu 2 fitness smartwatch, but it does not make any major mistakes either. It is therefore quite suitable for most navigation tasks.

GPS test: Summary
GPS test: Summary
GPS test: Pond
GPS test: Pond
GPS test: Trails
GPS test: Trails

Telephony and Voice quality

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro supports phone functions such as VoLTE and calls via Wi-Fi, with the ability to accommodate two nano-SIM cards. eSIMs cannot be activated.

In our testing, the Xiaomi phone demonstrated good voice quality and reliably filtered out distracting background noise from calls, even in noisy environments. The phone also manages hands-free mode quite well, though the voices sound somewhat muffled.

Cameras: Solid dual-50 MP cameras

Shooting with the selfie camera (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Shooting with the selfie camera (Image source: Manuel Masiero)

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro places its selfie camera in a small circular recess. The front camera uses the Omnivision OV20B image sensor and offers a 20 MP resolution. It takes coherent pictures with decent image sharpness, which is easily sufficient for everyday use. The selfie camera can record videos with a maximum of 1080p at 30 frames per second.

In contrast to the Poco X6 Pro, the Poco X7 Pro only has two cameras on the back instead of three. This is not really a step backwards, however, as only a few users are likely to mourn the loss of the 2 MP macro camera.

The Poco X7 Pro features a main camera with a resolution of 50 MP and an 8 MP ultra-wide-angle camera. The main camera is based on the Sony IMX882, works with an f/1.5 aperture, uses optical image stabilization (OIS), and produces 12.5 MP photos using 4-in-1 pixel binning. The full resolution can also be used with the 50 MP image mode in the camera app. The SmartSens SC820CS is used as the image sensor for the ultra-wide-angle camera.

Overall, the imaging performance is solidly average and is therefore within the range of what can be expected from a smartphone in this price range. In daylight, the Poco X7 Pro takes good pictures that show a relatively high level of detail, characterized by strong contrasts. However, they are sometimes much more intense than in reality, which makes them look artificial. The main camera performs well in zoom shots and in low residual light but only shows a few details. The ultra-wide-angle camera takes rather unspectacular but usable snapshots.

The main camera can record videos at up to 4K at 60 frames per second. Supported by the optical image stabilizer, the videos look pretty good. Switching between the main and ultra-wide-angle camera during recording only works up to a maximum of 1080p 30 fps

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2Ultraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLowlight-Aufnahme

Under laboratory conditions, the main camera shows that it can capture colors precisely with optimal lighting (maximum Delta E of 11.1). It also captures the test chart sharply.

In the extreme scenario with a residual brightness of 1 lux, the camera still manages to perform well as the color chart and test chart remain recognizable even in these conditions. 

ColorChecker
8.8 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: 8.46 ∆E min: 5.17 - max: 11.12 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
53 ∆E
38 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
43.2 ∆E
60.1 ∆E
53.1 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
40.9 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
63.3 ∆E
63.4 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
47.4 ∆E
35.9 ∆E
74 ∆E
41.8 ∆E
41.3 ∆E
85.5 ∆E
69.5 ∆E
51 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: 45.48 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 85.49 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty: No power supply unit included

The Poco X7 Pro comes with a USB Type-C cable (USB 2.0), a protective cover, a SIM tool, a quick start guide and another leaflet with safety instructions. The 90-watt power adapter is not included in the scope of delivery in the EU and the UK and is also not available in the manufacturer's online store at the time of testing.

In the Xiaomi store, you can purchase insurance cover for the Poco X7 Pro at Xiaomi Care. Depending on the package selected, this covers either accidental damage only (€39) or accidental damage and theft (€59) for a period of 2 years.

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro comes with a 12-month warranty in the EU.

Input devices and Operation: Up to 2,560 Hz touch sampling while gaming

The AMOLED screen of the Poco X7 Pro is scanned 480 times per second and converts inputs very quickly and accurately. In games, the touch sampling rate can increase to up to 2,560 Hz (in gaming turbo mode). Thanks to the 120 Hz refresh rate, the display is beautifully smooth. The vibration motor provides precise haptic feedback.

The power button, which was also colored yellow in our yellow and black test version, and the volume rocker sit firmly in the casing, have a precise pressure point, and leave a high-quality haptic impression. In addition to an always-on display, which is active for 10 seconds after tapping, a one-handed mode can also be activated, which reduces the display area accordingly.

The optical fingerprint sensor integrated into the display reliably unlocks the smartphone and also works when the screen is switched off. Biometric authentication is also possible using 2D facial recognition, which recognizes at the first attempt if there is sufficient ambient light.

Keyboard in portrait format
Keyboard in portrait format
Keyboard in landscape format
Keyboard in landscape format

Display: 120 Hz AMOLED panel with comprehensive HDR support

Subpixel
Subpixel

The AMOLED panel of the Poco X7 Pro has a resolution of 2,712 x 1,220 pixels and runs at up to a 120 Hz refresh rate. In the default setting, the smartphone automatically adjusts its refresh rate to the image content. It can be permanently set to 120 Hz if desired. In addition to HDR10 and HDR10+, the screen also supports HLG and Dolby Vision.

According to Xiaomi, the AMOLED screen achieves a maximum brightness of 1,400 nits, which increases to up to 3,200 nits in HDR mode. At 2,824 cd/m², our test device remains slightly below this mark, but almost exactly meets the manufacturer's specification with SDR image content at 1,372 cd/m².

If the brightness sensor is deactivated, a maximum of 532 cd/m² (SDR) or 897 cd/m² (HDR) can be elicited from the display. At the lowest brightness level, the display is still visible in low light with a luminance of 2.34 cd/m².

The AMOLED panel uses pulse width modulation (PWM) to control the brightness. As a result, the screen flickers at a PWM frequency of a low 120 Hz in all of the brightness levels we measured, which is actually not good news for sensitive users, although the signal amplitude is relatively flat.

At the same time, however, the AMOLED panel works with a PWM dimming frequency of 1,923 Hz (manufacturer's specification 1,920 Hz), so the negative PWM effects should be sufficiently mitigated.

1047
cd/m²
1047
cd/m²
1057
cd/m²
1041
cd/m²
1034
cd/m²
1052
cd/m²
1028
cd/m²
1024
cd/m²
1038
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1057 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1040.9 cd/m² Minimum: 2.34 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1034 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 1.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
P-OLED, 2670x1220, 6.4"
Nothing Phone (2a)
AMOLED, 2412x1084, 6.7"
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Screen
-6%
-29%
-10%
-16%
0%
Brightness middle
1034
1518
47%
1246
21%
1033
0%
962
-7%
1034
0%
Brightness
1041
1466
41%
1235
19%
1042
0%
967
-7%
1035
-1%
Brightness Distribution
97
88
-9%
98
1%
96
-1%
99
2%
96
-1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
1.2
-20%
1.8
-80%
1.6
-60%
1.6
-60%
1.1
-10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.2
3.3
-50%
3.81
-73%
2.5
-14%
2.6
-18%
1.9
14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.4
2
-43%
2.3
-64%
1.2
14%
1.5
-7%
1.4
-0%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.2 100%
2.191 100%
2.07 106%
2.13 103%
2.22 99%
CCT
6553 99%
6786 96%
6488 100%
6482 100%
6382 102%
6674 97%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 14.29 %
Secondary Frequency: 1923 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8580 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

minimum display brightness
min.
25 % display brightness
25 %
50 % display brightness
50 %
75 % display brightness
75 %
maximum manual display brightness
100 %

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

The AMOLED panel delivers the best picture quality in the Original Color Pro picture mode, which is active by default. We also recommend setting the color temperature to Warm.

The color precision, white balance, and RGB balance of our test device then fall in the optimum range.

Color fidelity (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Color fidelity (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Color space (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Color space (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Grayscale (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)
Color saturation (Image mode Original Color Pro, Color temperature Warm, Target color space sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.687 ms rise
↘ 0.742 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.69 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.749 ms rise
↘ 0.9445 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro performs well outdoors. In the wintry light conditions prevailing at the time of testing, the AMOLED panel with its stable viewing angle has no problems displaying a legible image. This is unlikely to change much in summer. 

Outdoor use (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Outdoor use (Image source: Manuel Masiero)
Viewpoint (Source: Manuel Masiero)
Viewpoint (Source: Manuel Masiero)

Performance: MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra makes its debut

In terms of performance, most other mid-range smartphones do not stand a chance against the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro. This is due to the octa-core SoC MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra, which gives the smartphone top-class performance.

In everyday use, the MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra and the 12 GB RAM of our test device ensure a hiccup-free operation. Although the Poco X7 Pro does not come close to the performance of absolute flagships, it does not lack power at any time even for complex apps or games.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1598 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
1598 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=189, last 2 years)
1502 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1424 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1157 Points -28%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
1128 Points -29%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1051 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
6239 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
6239 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4547 Points -27%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=189, last 2 years)
4256 Points -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3456 Points -45%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2977 Points -52%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2592 Points -58%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1267 Points +9%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1160 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
1160 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1085 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (139 - 2437, n=170, last 2 years)
1069 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
891 Points -23%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
890 Points -23%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5284 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
5284 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
4279 Points -19%
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 8816, n=170, last 2 years)
3594 Points -32%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
3366 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
3349 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
2177 Points -59%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1695493 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
1695493 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1465265 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=124, last 2 years)
1310811 Points -23%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
740935 Points -56%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
693939 Points -59%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
15116 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
14805 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
14805 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
14716 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=195, last 2 years)
13543 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
13393 Points -10%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points -22%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10924 Points -26%
CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1287 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
1287 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
987 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years)
954 Points -26%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
919 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
784 Points -39%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
695 Points -46%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8278 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
8278 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7122 Points -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 13729, n=160, last 2 years)
6608 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4964 Points -40%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4115 Points -50%
System
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
12177 Points +39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
11778 Points +34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 19891, n=160, last 2 years)
10420 Points +19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8761 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
8761 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
6734 Points -23%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
8484 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
8484 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
7784 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)
7221 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
4567 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
4109 Points -52%
Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
36491 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
36491 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)
18693 Points -49%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
16594 Points -55%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
10646 Points -71%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
8511 Points -77%
Web
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points +2%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1731 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
1731 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
1636 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)
1592 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
1474 Points -15%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
876 Points -49%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
64597 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
49010 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
49010 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points -39%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
26315 Points -46%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
18072 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
5205 Points -89%
AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288
33858 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
29244 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
29244 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
27025 Points -8%
Nothing Phone (2a)
MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288
11407 Points -61%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
585 Points -98%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
931 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
931 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=30, last 2 years)
439 Points -53%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
121 Points -87%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
6987 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
6987 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=30, last 2 years)
1188 Points -83%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
123 Points -98%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
9107 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
9107 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=30, last 2 years)
1919 Points -79%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
445 Points -95%
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=45, last 2 years)
764 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
540 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=45, last 2 years)
3546 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
1322 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
122 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=45, last 2 years)
5123 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
MediaTek Dimensity 7300, Mali-G615 MP2, 12288
2710 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
444 Points
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
1181 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
1181 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (46.4 - 3219, n=35, last 2 years)
953 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
107 Points -91%
Score V6
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
MediaTek Dimensity 8400, Immortalis-G720 MP7, 12288
5141 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
  (n=1)
5141 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 10957, n=33, last 2 years)
4033 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192
324 Points -94%

The ARM Mali-G720 MC7 of the MediaTek Dimensity 8400-Ultra gives the Poco X7 Pro a brute graphics performance that only the Poco X6 Pro can match to some extent. The Google Pixel 8a also performs above average here.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3691 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3085 Points -16%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points -36%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1156 Points -69%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
915 Points -75%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
854 Points -77%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3840 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3068 Points -20%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points -39%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1153 Points -70%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
926 Points -76%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
864 Points -77%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12261 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11204 Points -9%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points -27%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4259 Points -65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3992 Points -67%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3159 Points -74%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6358 Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6277 Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1333 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
350 Points -74%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1272 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -22%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
336 Points -74%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6996 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6342 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5850 Points -16%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5448 Points -22%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4006 Points -43%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3005 Points -57%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
20018 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14498 Points -28%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13159 Points -34%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7170 Points -64%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6935 Points -65%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5218 Points -74%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14161 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10622 Points -25%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7856 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6828 Points -52%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5966 Points -58%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5267 Points -63%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -7%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
568 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
462 fps -19%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps -34%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
159 fps -72%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps -76%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -32%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
243 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -12%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -60%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -61%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
117 fps -2%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -18%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -52%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -52%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
199 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
170 fps -15%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -41%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps -66%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps -18%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -63%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -65%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -39%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -67%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -70%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
73 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66 fps -10%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -19%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps -55%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps -63%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
18 fps -75%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
61 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52 fps -15%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -41%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps -69%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -77%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
108 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91 fps -16%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps -25%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -61%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
135 fps -12%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -37%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -65%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -68%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -75%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -14%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -43%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9.4 fps -66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7.9 fps -72%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6.2 fps -78%

Surfing the web is an easy task for the Poco X7 Pro as websites load quickly and are set up swiftly. This is also reflected in the strong browser benchmark results.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
139.947 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
139.9 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
134.031 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
131.393 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)
130.3 Points -7%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -32%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
76.624 Points -45%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
192 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
192 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
180 runs/min -6%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min -16%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=150, last 2 years)
155.5 runs/min -19%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
116 runs/min -40%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
104 runs/min -46%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=84, last 2 years)
12.4 runs/min +6%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
11.7 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
11.7 runs/min 0%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min -10%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Chrome 123.0.6312.99)
6.62 runs/min -43%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
6.3 runs/min -46%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
144 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
144 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
140 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
126 Points -12%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
125 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)
122.3 Points -15%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points -34%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
47146 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
47146 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
46286 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
41576 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=208, last 2 years)
40641 Points -14%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
23567 Points -50%
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
18562 Points -61%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nothing Phone (2a) (Firefox 124.2.0)
1569.6 ms * -78%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=169, last 2 years)
1469 ms * -66%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)
1012.6 ms * -15%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)
1007.2 ms * -14%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * -0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400 (n=1)
883 ms * -0%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro (Chrome 132.0.6834.163)
882.5 ms *

* ... smaller is better

With its UFS 4.0 memory, the Poco X7 Pro is extremely well positioned for this price range. This puts you in a good mood with short loading times while playing texture-heavy games, as the storage shows fast read/write speeds. 

Xiaomi Poco X7 ProGoogle Pixel 8aMotorola Edge 50 NeoNothing Phone (2a)Samsung Galaxy A55 5GXiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5GAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
49%
138%
97%
14%
237%
229%
116%
Sequential Read 256KB
3969.01
1509.65
-62%
1023
-74%
1028.37
-74%
1688.53
-57%
3824.7
-4%
Sequential Write 256KB
1813.29
255.31
-86%
964.6
-47%
952
-47%
831.44
-54%
3642.57
101%
Random Read 4KB
362.61
165.98
-54%
331
-9%
273.19
-25%
351.47
-3%
355.7
-2%
Random Write 4KB
49.17
243.82
396%
384.1
681%
311.8
534%
132.11
169%
467.74
851%

Games: Max frame rates are almost guaranteed

It is an easy task for the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro to render games smoothly. Our three test games Asphalt 9, Genshin Impact and PUBG: Mobile run at the maximum possible frame rate in all graphics settings.

For energy-saving reasons, 60 fps is usually the highest possible frame rate, but there is one exception: PUBG: Mobile runs at up to 120 FPS in Liquid graphics mode, a real rarity for this game.

We measure frame rates with our test tool Gamebench.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG: Mobile
PUBG: Mobile
0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; Standard / low; 24.4.0h: Ø59.9 (51-61)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro; Asphalt 9: Legends; High Quality; 24.4.0h: Ø59.9 (52-61)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.3.0_29183395_29332470: Ø59.9 (57-64)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.3.0_29183395_29332470: Ø59.5 (53-61)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø118.4 (114-120)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø59.7 (53-61)

Emissions: Fast throttling under load

Temperature

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro remains cool in normal operation. When surfing the web or playing music, the smartphone always feels comfortable to hold.

However, the Poco X7 Pro can heat up considerably under load. In the test, we measured a peak value of 44.5 °C — clearly noticeable but not really uncomfortably warm.

Internally, the phone throttles its performance quite fast. In the 3DMark stress test scenarios, this sometimes happens after the first of 20 runs.

In the end, there is significantly less SoC power available, but you won't notice this in everyday use.

Max. Load
 44.3 °C
112 F
44.4 °C
112 F
42.8 °C
109 F
 
 43.7 °C
111 F
44.5 °C
112 F
42.1 °C
108 F
 
 43.5 °C
110 F
42 °C
108 F
39.9 °C
104 F
 
Maximum: 44.5 °C = 112 F
Average: 43 °C = 109 F
41.3 °C
106 F
43.5 °C
110 F
43.4 °C
110 F
39.7 °C
103 F
42.6 °C
109 F
43.5 °C
110 F
36.7 °C
98 F
41.8 °C
107 F
42.6 °C
109 F
Maximum: 43.5 °C = 110 F
Average: 41.7 °C = 107 F
Power Supply (max.)  29.9 °C = 86 F | Room Temperature 21.4 °C = 71 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.7 % +85%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +84%
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +84%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
78.7 % +46%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -5%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (2a)
Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +78%
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.6 % +78%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.9 % +77%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % +19%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55.9 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -8%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
65.2 % +71%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38.1 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
Mali-G615 MP2, Dimensity 7300, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +38%
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
72 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % -25%
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.7 (13.1-23.4)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø63.6 (42-77.8)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73.8 (70.8-80.4)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.4 (10.8-20.6)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø17.6 (7.64-20)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Immortalis-G720 MP7, Dimensity 8400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø9.33 (7.22-10)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: Surface temperatures - Top
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: Surface temperatures - Top
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: Surface temperatures - Bottom
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro: Surface temperatures - Bottom

Speakers

The stereo speakers of the Poco X7 Pro support Dolby Atmos and deliver low bass sound that is characterized by relatively balanced highs and mids. The sound characteristics remain the same even at maximum volume as the speakers do not distort.

External audio devices can be connected to the smartphone via USB-C and Bluetooth 5.4. With support for SBC, AAC, LDAC, aptX, aptx HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, and LHDC V1 to V5, the Poco X7 Pro supports many Bluetooth codecs.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203333.62527.536.33122.835.64026.338.65036.440.86321.140.58020.742.810019.643.212512.642.316016.350.820016.35125013.158.531512.459.74001061.350010.866.463012.46980011.973.7100011.679.4125012.478.7160011.675.8200011.378.7250011.979.7315012.183.2400013.183500013.180.3630013.780.9800013.378.41000013.676.81250013.771.31600014.261.8SPL24.691.5N0.688.2median 12.6median 75.8Delta1.19.327.333.426.235.525.938.429.240.335.642.325.935.822.14117.840.517.146.518.157.414.255.214.15610.758.61159.312.863.711.164.61271.111.774.71279.312.877.412.479.512.379.713.3821384.213.581.613.278.913.878.213.776.113.469.313.360.624.991.40.685.1median 13.2median 74.719.7hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Poco X7 ProSamsung Galaxy A55 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Power management: Quick charges within 40 minutes

Energy consumption

The 6,000 mAh battery of the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro has improved compared to the Poco X6 Pro by 1,000 mAh and can now be charged faster as well. While the maximum charging speed was previously 67 W, it is now 90 W in the X7 Pro.

A full charging cycle takes exactly 40 minutes with the 90 W power supply unit included with our review unit. A charge level of 80% is reached after 32 minutes. The smartphone does not support wireless charging.

In terms of power consumption, the Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro behaves inconspicuously. When idle, it consumes slightly more power than the comparison devices but is more restrained under load.

The sometimes very different Wattages in the table are due to the fact that we measured the power consumption of older devices with the Stability Test app but now use the much more demanding Burnout Benchmark, which requires more power.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.19 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.07 / 1.29 / 1.36 Watt
Load midlight 6.14 / 13.94 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8400
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-5%
-2%
3%
-18%
0%
1%
Idle Minimum *
1.07
0.92
14%
0.81
24%
0.85
21%
1.11
-4%
1.07 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Average *
1.29
1.46
-13%
2.01
-56%
1.51
-17%
1.14
12%
1.29 ?(n=1)
-0%
Idle Maximum *
1.36
1.65
-21%
2.07
-52%
1.71
-26%
1.16
15%
1.36 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Average *
6.14
7.96
-30%
4.16
32%
4.87
21%
12.33
-101%
6.14 ?(n=1)
-0%
Load Maximum *
13.94
10.74
23%
7.91
43%
11.73
16%
15.34
-10%
13.9 ?(n=1)
-0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.41 (1.653-15.5)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø4.37 (1.064-10.1)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.78 (1.21-13.1)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.12 (1.016-1.408)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.848-1.176)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø13.8 (11.8-15)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.21 (4.99-5.9)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.9 (9.14-13.2)
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.12 (1.016-1.408)
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.242 (1.109-1.603)
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.899 (0.848-1.176)

Battery life

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro is one of the longest lasting smartphones in the price range up to €400. Almost 20 hours of simulated web surfing and over 21 hours of playing a video in a continuous loop mean that the Xiaomi smartphone can run for two days without a power supply, even with intensive use. It can also be charged quickly if necessary.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
33h 00min
WiFi Websurfing
19h 43min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
21h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 16min
Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro
6000 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Motorola Edge 50 Neo
4310 mAh
Nothing Phone (2a)
5000 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-18%
-30%
11%
2%
-14%
Reader / Idle
1980
1803
-9%
2522
27%
2202
11%
1815
-8%
H.264
1279
1132
-11%
1513
18%
1511
18%
967
-24%
WiFi v1.3
1183
796
-33%
824
-30%
1011
-15%
1077
-9%
942
-20%
Load
256
211
-18%
293
14%
220
-14%
251
-2%

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro is characterized by a strong price-performance ratio and scores points not only for its very solid features but also for its top-class performance.

Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro - 02/12/2025 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
89%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
49 / 69 → 71%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
93%
Games Performance
27 / 55 → 50%
Application Performance
68 / 85 → 80%
AI Performance
60%
Temperature
86%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 88%
Camera
69%
Average
67%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
50%
Power Use
96.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
61.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.6%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Read all 1 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Poco X7 Pro Smartphone Review: Dimensity 8400-Ultra debut with software updates until 2029 for under €400
Manuel Masiero, 2025-02-16 (Update: 2025-02-21)