Vivo Y400 Pro
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 32 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 1 scores (from 1 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo Y400 Pro
Source: Think Digit

The Vivo Y400 Pro strikes a good balance between style and substance. With its sleek design, vibrant AMOLED display, and reliable battery life, it’s well-suited for everyday users. Performance is smooth for daily tasks and light gaming, though power users may miss 90 FPS support and better low-light camera results. At ₹24,999, it’s a solid all-rounder. Vivo has launched another smartphone in the market, the Vivo Y400 Pro. It is a mid-range smartphone priced at Rs 24,999 and has a sleek design, a large AMOLED display, the Dimensity 7300 SoC, and a 5500mAh battery. It is pretty clear that the brand is pitching the Vivo Y400 Pro to Gen-Z users who want their phones to look good, feel fast, and deliver to their everyday needs.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/30/2025
Rating: Total score: 67% price: 66% performance: 59% workmanship: 73%
Comment
ARM Mali-G615 MP2: Mid-range graphics chip for smartphones with 2 of the 6 possible cores. Based on the fourth generation of Valhall architecture. Offers variable rate shading.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Dimensity 7300: The Dimensity 7300 is a mid-range processor with an integrated 5G modem. The CPU part integrates four ARM Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.5 GHz and four Cortex-A55 power cores with up to 2 GHz. The SoC is manufactured using the modern 4nm process.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.77":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.67%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.