Notebookcheck Logo
Lenovo Tab TB311FU review

Lenovo Tab review – 10-inch tablet as an affordable alternative for school, college, and the living room

Slim bezels, low price.

The Lenovo Tab is a compact and affordable tablet that aims to impress with a high display resolution, robust metal case, and stereo speakers. It can be used for school, college, or entertainment. We find out in our test whether the Lenovo Tab is worth a purchase.
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by Mark Riege) Published 🇩🇪 🇫🇷 ...
Android ARM Tablet

Verdict on the Lenovo Tab

The Lenovo Tab mainly impresses with its great display: For its price class, it offers a high resolution and high contrast with its low black value. It is also free from PWM flickering and even reaches a fairly high color accuracy. It only isn't very comfortable to use outdoors, since the maximum brightness around 430 cd/m² is too low for that.

We also like the stereo speakers with their well-rounded sound and the capability of locating the tablet via satellite – even it isn't always 100% accurate. The metal case shows high-quality workmanship, although it doesn't really protect the display from pressure very much.

At a price around 150 Euros (~$157), you cannot expect a lot of power, and some of the competitors still offer slightly more here. You also shouldn't depend on a lot of security, since the period of software updates is unsure. Another negative point is the slightly smaller battery: although it still offers an acceptable battery life, you get more endurance with other tablets in this price range.

If you can live with these restrictions, you have an elegant tablet with a good display and decent speakers at an affordable price here.

Pros

+ high-quality metal case
+ Full-HD screen with good color reproduction
+ good speaker sound
+ locating via satellite
+ microSD slot
+ good software for multitasking
+ no PWM
+ hardly any heat development or throttling under load

Cons

- only mediocre battery life
- no fingerprint sensor
- unsure update period
- pressure sensitive case
- no NFC
- lame storage

Price and Availability

Although the Lenovo Tab (TB311FU) isn't available in the US at the time of the test, it is announced for many global markets in Europe, Asia, Central and South America, and Africa. For example, the tablet with 64 GB of storage is available directly from Lenovo in the UK for around £140.

Amazon Logo
$309.04
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expansive Touchscreen Tablet - 12.7" 3K Display - 13MP Camera - 8GB Memory - 128GB UFS Storage - Android 13 - Dolby Atmos - Quad JBL Speakers - Pen and Folio Case Included
  • $289.99
    Lenovo Tab P12 - Expansive Touchscreen Tablet - 12.7" 3K Display - 13MP Camera - 8GB Memory - 128GB UFS Storage - Android 13 - Dolby Atmos - Quad JBL Speakers - Pen Included
  • $199.00
    Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Display, MediaTek Helio G88 Octa-Core, 4GB RAM, 128GB SSD, 1920x1200 px, Ambient Light-Sensor, 10 Hour Battery, Comes w/Folio Case, Luna Grey

Possible Alternatives in Comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
77.3%
Lenovo Tab
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $309.04
Lenovo Tab P12-2024 - Expans...
2. $289.99
Lenovo Tab P12 - Expansive T...
3. $199.00
Lenovo Tab M11, 11” Displa...
List Price: 150€
424 g64 GB eMMC Flash10.10"
1920x1200
224 PPI
IPS
2.
79.3% v7 (old)
Teclast M50
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
6 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon:
1. $249.99
TECLAST T65Max Tablet, 13" A...
2. $107.99
TECLAST Android Tablet with ...
3. $139.99
TECLAST Tablet 11 inch Andro...
List Price: 159€
460 g128 GB eMMC Flash10.10"
1280x800
149 PPI
IPS
3.
80.7% v7 (old)
Cubot Tab 50
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99 ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 2.1
Amazon:
1. $7.95
BoxWave Stylus Pouch Compati...
2. $14.99
Vaxson 3-Pack Screen Protect...
3. $14.98
Puccy 3 Pack Screen Protecto...
List Price: 199€
455 g256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash10.40"
2000x1200
224 PPI
IPS
4.
76.8%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB eMMC
Amazon:
List Price: 150€
373 g64 GB eMMC Flash8.70"
1340x800
179 PPI
IPS
5.
84.2% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 619 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 64 GB UFS 2.1
List Price: 249€480 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash11.00"
1920x1200
206 PPI
TFT-LCD

The Lenovo Tab (model number TB311FU or TB311XU) is meant for all those who don't want to spend too much money for a tablet while still getting a high-quality metal case, high-resolution display, and decent speakers. In addition, there is also an option to expand the storage via microSD card, and the tablet even supports locating its position via satellite.

With its 10.1-inch display, the Lenovo Tab isn't very large, so even children can enjoy using it for learning or entertainment.

Specifications

Lenovo Tab
Processor
Mediatek Helio G85 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
10.10 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 224 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, 60 Hz
Storage
64 GB eMMC Flash, 64 GB 
, 50 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, Card Reader: microSD, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration, proximity, magentometer, gyroscope
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.5 x 235 x 154 ( = 0.37 x 9.25 x 6.06 in)
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Ion, 15 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: stereo speakers, USB cable, microSD tray tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
424 g ( = 14.96 oz / 0.93 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
150 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Case – Affordable tablet with a metal case

The case of the Lenovo Tab is made of a metal-unibody and currently only available in Luna Gray color. Since the location of the antennas is not apparent on the case, we guess that they are behind the lighter area around the camera, which is made from plastic, so there would be less shielding from the metal.

The case shows clean workmanship, and the transitions to the display glass can hardly be felt by the fingers. With its rounded corners, the tablet is also comfortable to hold in the hand. However, some pressure or trying to warp the tablet can quickly lead to some display artifacts in the liquid crystal of the screen.

At 424 grams (~15 oz), the tablet is relatively light, and the 10.1-inch screen also makes it fairly compact. The display bezels are slim enough to give it a modern look, while at the same time offering enough room for the fingers to hold the tablet in the hand without accidentally operating the touchscreen.

Since there is no IP-certification, you should avoid using the tablet in dusty or wet conditions or getting water on it.

Lenovo Tab TB311FU review
Lenovo Tab TB311FU review
Lenovo Tab TB311FU review
Lenovo Tab TB311FU review
Lenovo Tab TB311FU review

Size Comparison

257.1 mm / 10.1 in 168.7 mm / 6.64 in 6.9 mm / 0.2717 in 480 g1.058 lbs246.4 mm / 9.7 in 161.5 mm / 6.36 in 7.7 mm / 0.3031 in 455 g1.003 lbs238 mm / 9.37 in 158 mm / 6.22 in 8 mm / 0.315 in 460 g1.014 lbs235 mm / 9.25 in 154 mm / 6.06 in 9.5 mm / 0.374 in 424 g0.935 lbs211.6 mm / 8.33 in 125.5 mm / 4.94 in 8.8 mm / 0.3465 in 373 g0.822 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Equipment – Two storage versions

There are currently two storage versions available for the Lenovo Tab in Europe: 

  • 4 GB RAM, 64 GB storage: 149 Euros (~$156)
  • 4 GB RAM, 128 GB storage: 159 Euros (~$167)

The model with 128 GB of storage is currently hard to find. Since the price difference is marginal, you should grab it if you can find one from a reputable vendor.

Our test unit only comes with WiFi. Even though the chipset would allow for an LTE model, that currently doesn't seem to be available.

The USB-C port is internally only connected via the USB-2.0 standard, so that data transfers are hardly accelerated and wired image output is not possible. Screen casting via Wi-Fi would be possible, if your display supports this or you have the corresponding dongle.

Despite its fairly compact size, the tablet unfortunately doesn't include NFC, so you also cannot use it for wireless payments.

Right side: USB-C port, speaker
Right side: USB-C port, speaker
Left side: Standby key, speaker
Left side: Standby key, speaker
Bottom: no connections
Bottom: no connections
Top: microSD slot, microphone, volume rocker
Top: microSD slot, microphone, volume rocker

microSD Card Reader

The tablet storage can be expanded via microSD card. When we test the speed of the reader using our Angelbird V60 reference storage card, we measure decent transfer rates around 40 MB/s, and there are also hardly any drops in the CPDT benchmark.

So you can easily use the microSD card to store your data files, since the data will be available relatively quickly.

SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
47.18 MB/s +19%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99 (Angelbird V60)
42.5 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
39.8 MB/s
Average of class Tablet
  (7.61 - 101.6, n=58, last 2 years)
35.3 MB/s -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
34.4 MB/s -14%
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)
30.5 MB/s -23%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.3 (29.9-45.4)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.9 (17.9-43.9)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (26.9-51.3)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36 (19.5-46.3)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø36.8 (29.7-46.3)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.2 (15.5-80.5)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.6 (35.7-82.5)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.5 (13.5-80.7)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø68.8 (13.6-78)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird AV Pro V60: Ø78 (60.4-86.2)

Software – Unsure about updates

Lenovo's ZUI is based on Android 14 and brings several particularities: The operating system on the Lenovo Tab heavily emphasizes multitasking, allowing several apps side by side or in windows and offering a task bar that shows the apps that are currently open and used most. In addition, the system also includes a special mode for operation using a mouse and keyboard.

There are actually very few preinstalled apps on the tablet. But since we are testing the 64-GB version, the storage can still be in short supply if you store many pictures and videos or install large apps.

Surprisingly, there is no information on the software updates for this tablet, even though Lenovo is usually very conscientious in this regard. This does not bode well, particularly since the last update for our system happened on September 5, 2024, which was 5 months ago at the time of this test. But at least you still get some basic security from the Google Play updates.

Lenovo Tab software
Lenovo Tab software
Lenovo Tab software

Sustainability

The packaging of the Lenovo Tab doesn't include any plastics. But otherwise, there is no information on the CO2 footprint of the device, or the materials used.

At this point, replacement parts aren't available (yet) for private customers.

Communication and GNSS – Lenovo tablet with satellite locating

The fastest WLAN standard supported by our test unit is WiFi 5. With this, the Lenovo Tab reaches speeds between 237 and 346 Mb/s in our WLAN test as can be expected. This also means that the transfer rates vary within a certain range, but overall they are relatively stable in the tests with our Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 reference router.

For those who have a Gigabit Internet connection at home or a fiber-optic connection at the office, the offered transfer speeds won't be sufficient, but everyone else can make relatively good use of their Internet connection with this. 

Close to the router, we see a full reception signal, and websites render at an acceptable speed. However, at a 10-meter (~33 ft) distance from the access point and through 3 walls, the signal strength drops by half and the speed rendering web pages noticeably drops even further. 

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (10.5 - 1463, n=81, last 2 years)
519 MBit/s +80%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (356min - 387max) MBit/s +28%
Cubot Tab 50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
364 (349min - 374max) MBit/s +26%
Teclast M50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
353 (331min - 359max) MBit/s +22%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=195)
349 MBit/s +21%
Lenovo Tab
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
289 (237min, 241.64P1 - 319max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
246 (171min - 290max) MBit/s -15%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Tablet
  (20.1 - 1705, n=81, last 2 years)
507 MBit/s +37%
Lenovo Tab
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
371 (342min, 345.77P1 - 389max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (338min - 385max) MBit/s -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
340 (172min - 350max) MBit/s -8%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=194)
328 MBit/s -12%
Cubot Tab 50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
324 (292min - 336max) MBit/s -13%
Teclast M50
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
302 (240min - 309max) MBit/s -19%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø289 (237-319)
Lenovo Tab; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø371 (342-389)
GPS Test outdoors
GPS Test outdoors
Available satellite networks
Available satellite networks

If you open a maps app, you get a pleasant surprise: Even though our test unit doesn't include mobile communication, it can still locate itself via satellite. As soon as you step outside with the Lenovo Tab, it quickly locates your position with an accuracy of up to 3 meters (~10 ft).

When we take a look at the available satellites, we experience another surprise: The tablet even includes SBAS for more accurate locating.

Now we really want to know and take the tablet on a bike tour, also taking the Garmin Venu 2 as a comparison device with us.

We see that the Lenovo Tab is able to locate its position well, even while moving or under difficult conditions. However, the locating isn't always completely accurate, for example placing us at the wrong side of the road during the turn or running through a bunch of garages or front yards. And in the tight alleys of the old city, the tablet's location isn't always shown 100% accurately either.

But overall, the Lenovo Tab can be used for navigation, if you want a large screen and aren't always depending on accuracy down to the exact meter.

Lenovo Tab locating – Overview
Lenovo Tab locating – Overview
Lenovo Tab locating – Turning point
Lenovo Tab locating – Turning point
Lenovo Tab locating – Bridge
Lenovo Tab locating – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 locating – Overview
Garmin Venu 2 locating – Overview
Garmin Venu 2 locating – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 locating – Turning point
Garmin Venu 2 locating – Bridge
Garmin Venu 2 locating – Bridge

Cameras – Decent for a tablet

Picture taken with the front camera
Picture taken with the front camera

Traditionally, cameras are often treated as an unimportant subject in tablets, and smartphones usually offer significantly better technology here. But the Lenovo Tab still includes an acceptable 8-Megapixel main camera on the back that you can easily use for reading QR codes, scanning documents, or capturing a snapshot, for example.

The images are acceptable in daylight conditions, although they can quickly get overexposed. The detail sharpness is at a medium level at best. Under low light conditions or with high contrasts, even more of the sharpness and dynamics are lost in the bright areas. Dark areas are brightened only very little. 

Videos can be recorded at maximum in 1080p at 60 fps, but you have to live with an autofocus here that repeatedly becomes noticeable doing its work.

While the 5 Megapixel front camera is okay for video conferencing, the resulting images are often too bright and only show little amount of detail.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low light
orginal image
click to load images

We test the main camera again in our test lab. Under full studio illumination, the color reproduction is fairly warm. But in the detail, small text is hardly readable anymore, and the camera also has some problems with red backgrounds. The image sharpness is at a medium level at best.

ColorChecker
5.3 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
10.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
3.2 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab: 6.15 ∆E min: 2.4 - max: 10.34 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
28.4 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38 ∆E
77.6 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
14 ∆E
ColorChecker Lenovo Tab: 47.48 ∆E min: 14.02 - max: 94.33 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty – 24 months of warranty

The box of the Lenovo Tab doesn't include a charger, but a USB-C cable and a tool to open the microSD card slot.

At Lenovo's web shop, you can find protective cases for the tablet that also serve as a tablet stand. In addition, there is also a very robust bumper case for kids that includes a stylus for easier operation.

Lenovo offers 24 months of warranty for the Lenovo Tab.

Input Devices and Operation – No fingerprint sensor

The touchscreen of the Lenovo Tab can be operated reliably even up to the edges and corners. Since there is no separate glove mode, you have to use your bare fingers, if you want to operate the tablet outdoors on cold days.

There is also no fingerprint sensor, and there is only an option to unlock the tablet via face recognition. This is done using the front camera and succeeds quickly and fairly reliably, after you've trained the tablet once. The display brightness is mostly sufficient to ensure that the face recognition succeeds even under bad light conditions.

However, this unlocking method isn't very secure and can be manipulated. This is also the reason why Android doesn't allow using face unlock without 3D-recognition to unlock banking apps and other apps that need a high level of security. This only leaves you with having to enter a pin code or password.

Keyboard landscape
Keyboard landscape
Keyboard portrait
Keyboard portrait

Display – Good image quality

Subpixel grid
Subpixel grid

The IPS screen has a 10.1-inch diagonal and resolution of 1920x1200 pixels. In this price class, this is actually a fairly high resolution and there are quite a few displays with significantly lower resolution. The Lenovo Tab is able to display detailed images on its screen.

The maximum refresh rate is 60 Hz, so those who are used to 90 or 120 Hz from their smartphones will probably notice the difference in display responsiveness here.

We measure a maximum brightness of 433 cd/m². While this is a decent value for a tablet in this price class, there are also devices that offer almost 500 cd/m² such as the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7.

388
cd/m²
423
cd/m²
374
cd/m²
412
cd/m²
433
cd/m²
383
cd/m²
369
cd/m²
387
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 433 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 393.4 cd/m² Minimum: 4.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 433 cd/m²
Contrast: 1804:1 (Black: 0.24 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
94.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.311
Lenovo Tab
IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"
Teclast M50
IPS, 1280x800, 10.1"
Cubot Tab 50
IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4"
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
IPS, 1340x800, 8.7"
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
TFT-LCD, 1920x1200, 11"
Screen
-115%
-131%
-20%
-78%
Brightness middle
433
371
-14%
308
-29%
499
15%
493
14%
Brightness
393
369
-6%
290
-26%
479
22%
460
17%
Brightness Distribution
85
87
2%
90
6%
90
6%
90
6%
Black Level *
0.24
0.45
-88%
0.45
-88%
0.37
-54%
0.35
-46%
Contrast
1804
824
-54%
684
-62%
1349
-25%
1409
-22%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.09
7.46
-257%
8.72
-317%
3.68
-76%
6
-187%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.74
16.5
-341%
14.17
-279%
6.82
-82%
11.7
-213%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
7.4
-164%
9.9
-254%
1.9
32%
8.2
-193%
Gamma
2.311 95%
2.055 107%
2.306 95%
2.184 101%
2.21 100%
CCT
6104 106%
8423 77%
9817 66%
6787 96%
9131 71%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8580 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

The display of the Lenovo Tab offers a good black value of 0.24 cd/m², which on one hand allows it to display fairly dark black color tones and on the other hand also results in a good contrast ratio, making colors appear quite vibrant.

In the Standard color mode, the color reproduction is fairly accurate with the deviations only being a bit high with yellow and red color tones. 

Fortunately, we are unable to detect any PWM flickering.

CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Grayscale
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN Color Accuracy
CalMAN sRGB Color Space
CalMAN sRGB Color Space
CalMAN AdobeRGB Color Space
CalMAN AdobeRGB Color Space
CalMAN DCI P3 Color Space
CalMAN DCI P3 Color Space
CalMAN Saturation
CalMAN Saturation

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
32.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.1 ms rise
↘ 16.4 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
51.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 26.9 ms rise
↘ 24.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.6 ms).

The Lenovo Tab is only suitable for outdoor use to a limited extent: In very bright surroundings, the display is very reflective, which makes it hard to see its contents. If you take the tablet outdoors, you should preferably stay in shady places. 

Due to the IPS technology, the viewing angle stability is very good. Even from very steep viewing angles, you can still see the image on the display, and there is only some minimal darkening around the edges.

Using the tablet outdoors
Using the tablet outdoors
Viewing angles
Viewing angles

Performance – The power of the entry-level class

Lenovo uses a MediaTek Helio G85 as the SoC here. It is already 5 years old but was originally used in the mid-range. Although this makes the Lenovo Tab adequately equipped for its price class in 2025, you can also get tablets that offer a significantly higher performance for only little more money.

When you surf through the system, you have to expect some stutters and wait times, particularly if some more demanding apps are running in the background.

The SoC is also suited for AI computations, delivering a mid-level performance for its price class here.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 3715, n=76, last 2 years)
1085 Points +170%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
919 Points +129%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
732 Points +82%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
403 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
402 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (366 - 416, n=5)
400 Points 0%
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
380 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (493 - 14690, n=76, last 2 years)
3466 Points +148%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
2040 Points +46%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1993 Points +43%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1449 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1396 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1386 Points -1%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1251 - 1449, n=5)
1367 Points -2%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (103 - 1887, n=70, last 2 years)
712 Points +113%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
693 Points +107%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
541 Points +61%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (335 - 437, n=16)
357 Points +7%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
349 Points +4%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
335 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
309 Points -8%
Multi-Core
Average of class Tablet
  (303 - 8624, n=70, last 2 years)
2534 Points +92%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
1818 Points +38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1768 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1456 Points +10%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1184 - 1456, n=16)
1321 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1320 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
1305 Points -1%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 2716980, n=43, last 2 years)
772514 Points +177%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
422144 Points +51%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (278813 - 281399, n=2)
280106 Points 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
278813 Points
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
10550 Points +38%
Average of class Tablet
  (3195 - 20841, n=72, last 2 years)
10152 Points +33%
Cubot Tab 50
Mediatek Helio G99, Mali-G57 MP2, 8192
9586 Points +26%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (6596 - 9437, n=14)
8086 Points +6%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7985 Points +5%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7622 Points
Teclast M50
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 6144
7383 Points -3%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (172 - 1944, n=62, last 2 years)
786 Points +99%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
578 Points +47%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
394 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
386 Points -2%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (280 - 394, n=5)
351 Points -11%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 11721, n=57, last 2 years)
4360 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3596 Points +72%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2270 Points +9%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2087 - 2422, n=7)
2258 Points +8%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2087 Points
System
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
7626 Points +81%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 16435, n=57, last 2 years)
7371 Points +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4932 Points +17%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (4213 - 5010, n=7)
4608 Points +9%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4213 Points
Memory
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 12938, n=57, last 2 years)
5080 Points +125%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
3872 Points +72%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (2253 - 3437, n=7)
2785 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2662 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2253 Points
Graphics
Average of class Tablet
  (418 - 57192, n=57, last 2 years)
9799 Points +451%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
4337 Points +144%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1780 - 1960, n=7)
1842 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1810 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1780 Points
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
1307 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2056, n=57, last 2 years)
1292 Points +15%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (1028 - 1198, n=7)
1129 Points +1%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1122 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1118 Points 0%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 74821, n=55, last 2 years)
11205 Points +151%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
5687 Points +27%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4472 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (3849 - 5112, n=4)
4333 Points -3%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3899 Points -13%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet
  (84 - 156427, n=49, last 2 years)
6855 Points +830%
Average Mediatek Helio G85
  (737 - 784, n=2)
761 Points +3%
Lenovo Tab
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
737 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 4096
429 Points -42%

The graphics computations are rather slow, causing the Lenovo Tab to have problems remaining above 30 fps even in older benchmarks. The tablet is too weak for 1440p or 4K resolutions with modern graphics.

Even with graphics computations in the native resolution of the display, you have to be content with fairly low frame rates.

Streaming of 4K videos on YouTube works without stutters, and we only see the occasional hick-up right after loading a video.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points +97%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
335 Points +86%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
178 Points -1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
99 Points -45%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
361 Points +98%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
344 Points +89%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
182 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
180 Points -1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
89 Points -51%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1206 Points +70%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1056 Points +49%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
710 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -2%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
421 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1216 Points +70%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1165 Points +63%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
715 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
694 Points -3%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
426 Points -40%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3561 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3409 Points +18%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
2886 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
2659 Points -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2991 Points +148%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2449 Points +103%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1206 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
829 Points -31%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3075 Points +122%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2632 Points +90%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1385 Points
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
979 Points -29%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
82 fps +100%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
53 fps +29%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
51 fps +24%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
41 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93 fps +121%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps +52%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
42 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
40 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
45 fps +88%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
39 fps +63%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
38 fps +58%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps +96%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps +67%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
24 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
22 fps -8%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +120%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
28 fps +87%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
24 fps +60%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +127%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
26 fps +73%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
15 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps -7%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +113%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
14 fps +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
14 fps +57%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +104%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +61%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
9.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.9 fps -4%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +145%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
9.5 fps +79%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.1 fps +53%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
7.2 fps +36%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
5.3 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps +148%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6 fps +82%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.3 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
3.2 fps -3%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
2 fps -39%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
21 fps +150%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
15 fps +79%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +31%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
11 fps +31%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.4 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps +156%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps +86%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.6 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
8.5 fps -1%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
5.5 fps -36%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps +157%
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.2 fps +57%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
1.4 fps
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
0.8 fps -43%

When surfing the Internet, you need to bring some patience from time to time: Larger websites can take fairly long until they are fully loaded. 

Even within its price class and using a modern browser, our test unit is only able to reach one of the places in the middle or back of the field in the browser benchmarks.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=67, last 2 years)
117.8 Points +92%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
96.598 Points +58%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
61.274 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
51.638 Points -16%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (29.2 - 61.3, n=8)
39.8 Points -35%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=59, last 2 years)
133.5 runs/min +186%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
71.6 runs/min +53%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
48.6 runs/min +4%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
46.7 runs/min
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (27 - 48.6, n=7)
35.2 runs/min -25%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 33.7, n=33, last 2 years)
12 runs/min +299%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
3.11 runs/min +3%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.01 - 3.11, n=2)
3.06 runs/min +2%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
3.01 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=66, last 2 years)
112.2 Points +93%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
107 Points +84%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
59 Points +2%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
58 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (51 - 59, n=3)
56 Points -3%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
30093 Points +95%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
29301 Points +90%
Cubot Tab 50 (Chrome 122)
21326 Points +38%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
15443 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
13605 Points -12%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (10299 - 15443, n=14)
12959 Points -16%
Teclast M50 (Chrome 122)
12461 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=73, last 2 years)
3702 ms * -37%
Average Mediatek Helio G85 (2712 - 3939, n=8)
3334 ms * -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches (Chrome 131)
2742 ms * -1%
Lenovo Tab (Chrome 133)
2711.6 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ (Chrome 121.0.6167.143)
1352.9 ms * +50%

* ... smaller is better

Slow eMMC flash has to be sufficient as storage of the Lenovo Tab, and other tablets such as the Cubot Tab 50 show that you can get more modern storage even in this price class.

This means that you have to expect some longer load times and rather slow results when transferring files.

Lenovo TabTeclast M50Cubot Tab 50Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inchesSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+Average 64 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
-28%
114%
-15%
55%
-39%
163%
Sequential Read 256KB
294
269.9
-8%
976.4
232%
289
-2%
485.96
65%
Sequential Write 256KB
255.3
196
-23%
374
46%
263.6
3%
476.37
87%
177 ?(40 - 274, n=205)
-31%
Random Read 4KB
119.5
69.6
-42%
183.3
53%
71.1
-41%
130.67
9%
Random Write 4KB
102
62.3
-39%
228.4
124%
82.7
-19%
162.9
60%

Games – Gaming on the Lenovo Tab

You can only really get into gaming with the Lenovo Tab if you lower your expectations: While simple casual games can run smoothly even on the affordable tablet, demanding games such as Genshin Impact or PUBG Mobile only run at 30 fps, even in low settings. And even then, smooth rendering isn't always a given and there are also some drops. We test the frame rates with the software from GameBench

The touchscreen is well-suited for gaming operation, and the position sensor also works reliably in games such as Temple Run and Subway Surfers.

Genshin Impact
Genshin Impact
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø33 (17-40)
Lenovo Tab; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.4.0_30057195_30231699: Ø25.7 (13-33)
Lenovo Tab; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.6.0: Ø35.5 (14-41)
Lenovo Tab; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.6.0: Ø28.6 (24-31)

Emissions – Hardly any heat development or throttling

Temperatures

Under longer load, we measure a maximum temperature of 33.5 °C (92.3 °F) on the case of the tablet. While this is just barely noticeable, it is by no means critical. So we can give high marks to the temperature management of the tablet.

This is also noticeable in the stress tests of 3DMark: Even after 20 runs of the same benchmark, the performance capabilities of the SoC only drops minimally at most.

Max. Load
 33.5 °C
92 F
32.5 °C
91 F
29.1 °C
84 F
 
 32 °C
90 F
31.6 °C
89 F
28.6 °C
83 F
 
 31.6 °C
89 F
29.9 °C
86 F
28 °C
82 F
 
Maximum: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Average: 30.8 °C = 87 F
29.1 °C
84 F
29.4 °C
85 F
33.5 °C
92 F
29.1 °C
84 F
30.4 °C
87 F
31.8 °C
89 F
29.1 °C
84 F
30.8 °C
87 F
30.8 °C
87 F
Maximum: 33.5 °C = 92 F
Average: 30.4 °C = 87 F
Power Supply (max.)  43.2 °C = 110 F | Room Temperature 20.2 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 29.9 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.5 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.9 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
99 % 0%
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.9 % 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 %
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93.1 % -6%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Cubot Tab 50
Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.1 % +1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.7 % 0%
Lenovo Tab
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash
98.4 %
Teclast M50
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash
85.3 % -13%
01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.092 (1.083-1.101)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø0.621 (0.58-0.68)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.08 (2.06-2.08)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.083 (1.076-1.09)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.16 (2.14-2.16)
Lenovo Tab Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.29 (4.25-4.3)
Teclast M50 Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.56 (2.54-2.57)
Cubot Tab 50 Mali-G57 MP2, Helio G99, 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.06 (6.96-7.47)
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 64 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.17 (4.14-4.19)
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.26 (7.23-7.27)
Heatmap front
Heatmap front
Heatmap back
Heatmap back

Speakers

Available Bluetooth audio codecs
Available Bluetooth audio codecs

The two speakers of the Lenovo Tab are placed on the side edges of the tablet, allowing for some light stereo effects when holding the tablet in landscape mode.

The maximum volume is sufficient for listening in a small or medium-size room, and the sound is actually quite decent, particularly when considering the price of the tablet. Although the sound spectrum hardly contains any real bass or even low mids, the rest is balanced without the highs being overemphasized. So listening to Pop music can be enjoyable with the tablet.

For watching movies or serials, some users would probably want an even more powerful sound. To get that, you can connect speakers or headphones via the 3.5mm audio port or wirelessly via Bluetooth. Both methods work without any problems. For a Bluetooth connection both devices have to support the right audio codecs. The Lenovo Tab supports the most important standards in this regard and is even able to score with Hi-Res codecs such as LDAC or aptX HD.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.540.12539.440.63136.3304033.5365037.737632725.18023.42410022.728.712519.234.216020.940.820019.646.925017.251.731516.855.340015.254.650016.156.363020.864.880020.670.2100018.572.2125016.775.1160018.272.5200015.968.825001569.9315017.969.4400020.868.3500021.269.6630019.372.3800020.473.61000018.576.61250016.264.81600016.252.3SPL30.983.3N1.456.3median 18.5median 68.3Delta1.99.728.642.525.932.923.426.127.330.736.230.625.429.816.629.216.93614.744.913.156.115.15314.355.211.658.810629.170.211.171.19.176.111.8821581.611.378.3127712.37712.77312.673.113.175.313.478.913.577.913.573.313.669.713.663.724.789.30.679.9median 13.1median 73.11.38.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo TabSamsung Galaxy Tab A9+
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Tab audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.8% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+ audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery Life – It could be longer

Power Consumption

In terms of its minimum power consumption, the Lenovo Tab isn't particularly efficient, drawing 1.7 watts from the battery. The rest of the consumption values are at an average level, resulting in an overall consumption that isn't too high at a maximum of 7.2 watts.

The tablet can be charged at a maximum of 15 watts, but a corresponding charger is not included. The Lenovo Tab was able to use all the chargers we tested without any problems. It takes about 1:45 hours to completely recharge the tablet.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.1 / 0.2 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.7 / 1.9 / 2.2 Watt
Load midlight 4.6 / 7.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Average Mediatek Helio G85
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
27%
-75%
15%
-79%
Idle Minimum *
1.7
0.9
47%
1
41%
1.043 ?(0.7 - 1.7, n=8)
39%
Idle Average *
1.9
1.2
37%
4.76
-151%
1.609 ?(0.9 - 2.9, n=8)
15%
Idle Maximum *
2.2
1.7
23%
4.79
-118%
1.988 ?(1.3 - 3, n=8)
10%
Load Average *
4.6
3.5
24%
9.52
-107%
4.27 ?(3.5 - 5.3, n=8)
7%
Load Maximum *
7.2
6.9
4%
9.92
-38%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.83 (1.707-7.17)
Lenovo Tab; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.862 (1.787-2.2)

Power Consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

00.20.50.70.91.21.41.61.92.12.32.62.833.33.53.744.24.4Tooltip
Lenovo Tab; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø4.29 (4.01-4.66)
Lenovo Tab; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.862 (1.787-2.2)

Battery Life

Once the 5,100-mAh capacity battery is fully charged, you can use the Lenovo Tab for up to 11:45 hours surfing in the WLAN or 12:39 hours watching movies from the internal storage.

While this should be sufficient for a regular day away from the outlet, there are also other tablets such as the Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 that last significantly longer. The relatively small battery of the Lenovo Tab becomes noticeable here.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
32h 28min
WiFi Websurfing
11h 45min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
12h 39min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 02min
Lenovo Tab
5100 mAh
Teclast M50
6000 mAh
Cubot Tab 50
7500 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Pad SE 8.7 inches
6650 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab A9+
7040 mAh
Battery Runtime
5%
20%
45%
13%
Reader / Idle
1948
2236
15%
2275
17%
H.264
759
1268
67%
800
5%
WiFi v1.3
705
742
5%
844
20%
1222
73%
920
30%
Load
242
302
25%
243
0%

Notebookcheck Overall Evaluation

Testing the Lenovo Tab. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.
Testing the Lenovo Tab. Test unit provided by Lenovo Germany.

The Lenovo Tab is an affordable tablet with a compact size, a display with a relatively high resolution, and sufficient performance as long as you reduce your demands. We particularly like the speakers and the capability to locate its position via satellite.

On the other hand, the fairly small battery won't allow for a very long battery life, and you shouldn't expect many software updates.

Lenovo Tab - 02/15/2025 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
81 / 98 → 83%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
36 / 69 → 52%
Weight
84 / 40-88 → 93%
Battery
89%
Display
85%
Games Performance
3 / 65 → 5%
Application Performance
42 / 92 → 46%
AI Performance
5%
Temperature
95%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 91 → 82%
Camera
45 / 90 → 50%
Average
54%
77%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
5%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
95.2%
Repairability
8%
Software Updates
5%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 33.9%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Lenovo Tab review – 10-inch tablet as an affordable alternative for school, college, and the living room
Florian Schmitt, 2025-02-16 (Update: 2025-02-16)