Notebookcheck

ZTE Axon 20 Review - How good is the first under-display camera in a smartphone?

Exotic SoC. One of the most innovative phones of the year comes from ZTE. The Axon 20 is the first smartphone with an under-display camera that does without a notch or pop-up mechanism. Whether the camera module below the OLED panel in the Axon 20 is convincing can be found out in the review of the ZTE smartphone.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, Brian Burriston (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
Test ZTE Axon 20

The ZTE Axon 20 is the first smartphone that hides its selfie camera under the display. This is made possible by a special OLED display technology that uses partially transparent areas of a panel.

Besides the 32 MP under-display front camera, the Axon 20 integrates a 6.92-inch OLED display, a quad-camera setup, 6 GB of RAM and 128 GB of internal storage. The Chinese manufacturer relies on an exotic SoC, a Unisoc Tiger T618, as the processor.

ZTE Axon 20 (Axon Series)
Processor
UNISOC Tiger T618 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
6144 MB 
Display
6.92 inch 20.5:9, 2460 x 1080 pixel 388 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 110 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: Type-C-Port, Card Reader: microSD up to 2 TB (FAT, FAT32, exFAT), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.98 x 172.1 x 77.9 ( = 0.31 x 6.78 x 3.07 in)
Battery
4220 mAh Lithium-Ion
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 10
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, Videos @1080p/​60fps, Camera 1); 8.0MP (f/​2.2, wide angle lens, Camera 2); 2.0MP (f/​2.4, macro lens, Camera 3); 2.0MP (f/​2.4, depth of field, Camera 4), camera2-API: Limited
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (AI-Under-Display-Kamera)
Additional features
Speakers: Mono, charger, USB cable, MiFavor UI, 24 Months Warranty, Widevine L3, SAR value: 1.041W/​kg Head, Single-Band: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, fanless
Weight
198 g ( = 6.98 oz / 0.44 pounds), Power Supply: 51 g ( = 1.8 oz / 0.11 pounds)
Price
399 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Possible competitors in comparison

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Best Price
77 %
01/2021
ZTE Axon 20
Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.92"2460x1080
81 %
12/2020
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
SD 690 5G, Adreno 619L
190 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.49"2400x1080
82 %
12/2020
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619
215 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
80 %
10/2020
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
SD 730G, Adreno 618
223 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.81"2400x1080
81 %
10/2020
Samsung Galaxy M51
SD 730, Adreno 618
213 g128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash6.70"2400x1080
86 %
07/2020
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
SD 865, Adreno 650
219 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080

Case - ZTE Axon 20 without notch

The front camera area of the ZTE Axon 20 is not completely invisible.
The front camera area of the ZTE Axon 20 is not completely invisible.

With a casing thickness of 8 millimeters (~0.3 inches) and the slightly curved glass back, the very large Axon 20 lies relatively securely in the hands. The build quality is on a very good level, and the casing's stability also makes a decent impression, although the frame is made of plastic.

Thanks to the partially transparent OLED display and a new pixel structure, ZTE's phone does not need a display hole or a notch. However, the edges could have been a bit more minimalized, so the screen's ratio to the total front is only 84.8% despite the hidden selfie cam.

The ZTE phone does not offer protection against water or dust via IP certification.

Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20

Size comparison

172.1 mm / 6.78 inch 77.9 mm / 3.07 inch 7.98 mm / 0.3142 inch 198 g0.4365 lbs170 mm / 6.69 inch 78.1 mm / 3.07 inch 9.7 mm / 0.3819 inch 223 g0.4916 lbs165.38 mm / 6.51 inch 76.8 mm / 3.02 inch 9 mm / 0.3543 inch 215 g0.474 lbs163.9 mm / 6.45 inch 76.3 mm / 3 inch 9.5 mm / 0.374 inch 213 g0.4696 lbs163.3 mm / 6.43 inch 75.4 mm / 2.97 inch 8.9 mm / 0.3504 inch 219 g0.4828 lbs163 mm / 6.42 inch 74.7 mm / 2.94 inch 8.95 mm / 0.3524 inch 190 g0.4189 lbs

Features - ZTE phone with Widevine L3

DRM-protected content from streaming platforms cannot be played in HD resolution with the Axon 20's DRM Widevine certification L3. Peripheral devices can be connected via the USB-C port using an OTG adapter. The USB interface uses the 2.0 standard for data transfer. Wireless image transmission of display content via Miracast also works without problems.

The internal eMMC storage has a capacity of 128 GB, but the user only has about 110 GB available in the state of delivery. If the storage space is not enough, it can be expanded with an additional microSD card. The exFAT file system is supported.

Software - ZTE Axon 20 with Android 10

The Chinese manufacturer installs the operating system Android version 10, which is supplemented by ZTE's own user interface MiFavor. The security patches are no longer up-to-date at the time of the test with September 2020.

Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20

Communication and GPS - ZTE phone only locates slowly

ZTE relies on Bluetooth version 5.0 for the Axon 20, and the built-in NFC chip also enables near-field communication. The dual-SIM smartphone uses the 4G standard for mobile Internet access and covers all relevant LTE frequencies for Germany, but only 8 LTE bands in total.

The integrated WLAN module supports the IEEE 802.11 standard according to a/b/g/n/ac and operates in the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequency range. In combination with our reference router Netgear Nighthawk AX12, the mid-range phone achieves solid transfer rates of over 300 MBit/s for this price range.

Networking
iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
770 (741min - 794max) MBit/s ∼100% +142%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
667 (339min - 692max) MBit/s ∼87% +110%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
646 (596min - 664max) MBit/s ∼84% +103%
Average of class Smartphone
  (15.5 - 1414, n=300, last 2 years)
388 MBit/s ∼50% +22%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
337 (270min - 351max) MBit/s ∼44% +6%
ZTE Axon 20
Mali-G52 MP2, Tiger T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
318 (289min - 326max) MBit/s ∼41%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
309 (140min - 360max) MBit/s ∼40% -3%
iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 865, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
859 (755min - 907max) MBit/s ∼100% +183%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Adreno 619L, SD 690 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
665 (604min - 684max) MBit/s ∼77% +119%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Adreno 619, SD 750G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
551 (465min - 583max) MBit/s ∼64% +81%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.59 - 1599, n=300, last 2 years)
373 MBit/s ∼43% +23%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Adreno 618, SD 730G, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
326 (309min - 343max) MBit/s ∼38% +7%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Adreno 618, SD 730, 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash
325 (318min - 330max) MBit/s ∼38% +7%
ZTE Axon 20
Mali-G52 MP2, Tiger T618, 128 GB eMMC Flash
304 (186min - 418max) MBit/s ∼35%
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400320308289322300321310322321321326319322320320318321324325319322319322316320319321324309322320308289322300321310322321321326319322320320318321324325319322319322316320319321324309322319312328301327309316316286310285313294299301288319186418305301306282300302298294315291303Tooltip
; iperf3 Client (receive) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø318 (289-326)
; iperf3 Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 4M x10; iperf 3.1.3: Ø304 (186-418)
Locating in the building
Locating in the building
Outdoor locating
Outdoor locating

The GPS module finds the current position outdoors with a long delay and an accuracy of 3 meters (~10 feet). Indoors, positioning is not possible with the Axon 20.

To get a better overview of the positioning capabilities, we take our ZTE phone on a bike tour. The Axon 20 scores with quite decent route accuracy on the test route, and the deviations from the Garmin Edge 500 are within limits.

GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS Garmin Edge 500
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20
GPS ZTE Axon 20

Phone features and voice quality - Axon 20 with VoLTE

The dual-SIM phone offers space for two nano-SIM cards and a VoLTE feature. The voice quality is not one of the Axon 20's strengths. The call transmission is distorted and the achieved volume via the earpiece is quite low. However, our calling partners attest the ZTE phone a good intelligibility.

Cameras - ZTE Axon 20 with triple cam

Test ZTE Axon 20
Shot with the 32 MP selfie cam of the Axon 20
Shot with the 32 MP selfie cam of the Axon 20

The big star in the camera department is the 32 MP under-display selfie lens - but only on paper. In everyday use, the photo quality of the Axon 20 is beaten by any low-budget phone because selfies with the ZTE smartphone are characterized by soft focus, overexposure, low contrast and low dynamic range.

The ZTE phone does not have a telephoto lens for zoom shots. The 64 MP main camera also hardly offers any dynamics and overexposed areas in the photos, but the sharpness and also the white balance are appealing in daylight. In dark surroundings, it is useless to reach for the Axon 20 in view of the low-light qualities.

The same applies for the ultra-wide-angle camera, but already in daylight. Neither the color reproduction nor the image sharpness is good here. With minimal backlighting, hardly anything is recognizable due to the poor dynamics anyway.

Ultra wide angle
Ultra wide angle
Wide angle
Wide angle
4x zoom (max)
4x zoom (max)
Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20
Test ZTE Axon 20

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angleWide-angleLow LightZoomUltra-wide-angle
click to load images
ColorChecker
30.4 ∆E
55.5 ∆E
40.1 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
64.2 ∆E
54.6 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
44.3 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
66.6 ∆E
65.2 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
77.9 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
44.5 ∆E
94.9 ∆E
71.8 ∆E
53 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker ZTE Axon 20: 47.76 ∆E min: 13.95 - max: 94.85 ∆E
ColorChecker
6.9 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
ColorChecker ZTE Axon 20: 6.42 ∆E min: 1.45 - max: 10.88 ∆E

Accessories and warranty - ZTE phone with cover

Besides the smartphone itself, a USB cable, a silicone case, and a modular power adapter (18 watts) are included in the box.

The warranty is 24 months.

Input devices and operation - ZTE phone with high touch sampling rate

The capacitive multi-touchscreen with a touch sampling rate of 240 Hz pleases with precise operation in the test. Biometric identification via face is not available for unlocking ZTE's smartphone. However, an optical fingerprint sensor is hidden underneath the OLED panel. The recognition rate is good, even though the sensor is not really fast.

Display - ZTE smartphone with OLED panel

Representation of the sub-pixel ...
Representation of the sub-pixel ...
... in the area of the front cam
... in the area of the front cam

The OLED panel of the Axon 20 achieves a pixel density of 388 ppi at a resolution of 2460 x 1080 pixels and a diagonal of 6.92 inches, which ensures sufficiently sharp display content in normal use and viewing distances.

The maximum luminance of 404 cd/m² that we measured is (still) satisfactory for a mid-range smartphone, but the competition is sometimes much brighter in our measurements. Even the realistic APL50 test (Average Picture Level) with evenly distributed bright and dark areas does not change this (396 cd/m²).

The Axon 20 uses pulse width modulation, or PWM for short, with a relatively high frequency of 343-368 Hz to control the luminance, whichspeaks fora panel with a native refresh rate of 90 Hz.However, this is not noticeable in everyday use under the MiFavor UI, and ZTE does not advertise the OLED display of the Axon 20 with 90 Hz either - apps for reading the refresh rate indicate 60 Hz.

398
cd/m²
400
cd/m²
409
cd/m²
401
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
406
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
413
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 413 cd/m² Average: 405 cd/m² Minimum: 0.36 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 402 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.5 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.6
ΔE Greyscale 5.1 | 0.64-98 Ø5.9
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.33
ZTE Axon 20
OLED, 2460x1080, 6.92
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
IPS LCD, 2400x1080, 6.49
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.67
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
LTPS, 2400x1080, 6.81
Samsung Galaxy M51
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.70
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Super AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.67
Screen
18%
27%
6%
25%
61%
Brightness middle
402
450
12%
606
51%
390
-3%
626
56%
799
99%
Brightness
405
422
4%
574
42%
377
-7%
632
56%
801
98%
Brightness Distribution
96
89
-7%
89
-7%
93
-3%
94
-2%
97
1%
Black Level *
0.57
0.44
0.66
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
3.5
2.67
24%
2.4
31%
3.39
3%
2.88
18%
1.46
58%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
7.7
6.76
12%
5.3
31%
5.22
32%
4.97
35%
2.92
62%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.1
2
61%
4.5
12%
4.3
16%
5.9
-16%
2.7
47%
Gamma
2.33 94%
2.274 97%
2.21 100%
2.506 88%
3.441 64%
2.237 98%
CCT
7480 87%
6859 95%
6224 104%
6033 108%
6415 101%
6003 108%
Contrast
789
1377
591

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 367.6 Hz ≤ 99 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 367.6 Hz (Likely utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 367.6 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 51 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 9716 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 151500) Hz was measured.

Due to the technology, the OLED display of the Axon 20 has a clear contrast advantage compared with IPS competition because organic displays show an "absolute" black even in a completely darkened room and at maximum brightness.

The analysis of the photospectrometer and the CalMAN software reveals somewhat high average delta E deviations to the P3 color space for the Axon 20 with 3.5 (colors) and 5.1 (grayscale), respectively, with an ideal range of values <3. The color temperature is clearly increased ex-factory with almost 7,500 K, measured against the ideal value of 6,500 K. The P3 color space is almost completely covered by the OLED panel.

Color accuracy (target color space: P3)
Color accuracy (target color space: P3)
Color space (target color space: P3)
Color space (target color space: P3)
Grayscale (target color space: P3)
Grayscale (target color space: P3)
Color saturation (target color space: P3)
Color saturation (target color space: P3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (24.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
3.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.6 ms rise
↘ 1.6 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.8 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (38.5 ms).

Outdoors, the organic display of the ZTE smartphone performs well in winter sunshine. Content is readable in direct sunlight, even though the maximum luminance could be a bit higher.

The viewing angles are on a very good level. Even at very flat viewing angles, display content is shown relatively true to color and vividly. Color changes do not occur.

Performance - ZTE Axon 20 is exotic

ZTE relies on a rather unknown Chinese semiconductor manufacturer from Shanghai called Unisoc for its Axon 20. The chipset called Tiger T618 is manufactured in a 12nm process and combines two 2.0 GHz Cortex A75 cores with six 1.8 GHz Cortex A55 processors. Unisoc installs a Mali G52 MP2 as the graphics unit. The SoC also integrates a signal processor (VDSP) that processes AI functions.

The combination of Unisoc's SoC and 6 GB of RAM occasionally makes for a jerky experience in everyday use, but simple tasks like switching home screens run smoothly. Not only micro-stutters occur in multitasking or when processes are running in the background, but longer phases in which the Axon 20 cannot be used. The bottleneck of the system is the very slow memory, even for an eMMC type, which leads to long loading times.

The benchmark results show a similar picture. The Tiger T618 is more comparable with low-budget SoCs than with a mid-range processor from Qualcomm. In terms of performance, the chipset in the Axon 20 is based on the Chinese version of the Kirin 710A, which was manufactured by SMIC.

The very responsive navigation in the browser is striking. Even complex pages load quite quickly and can be used smoothly. The benchmarks also point in this direction. The Axon 20 is only 11% behind a Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G in WebXPRT 3.

Geekbench 5.3
Vulkan Score 5.3 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1022 Points ∼33%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
905 Points ∼30% -11%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1081 Points ∼35% +6%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
987 Points ∼32% -3%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1007 Points ∼33% -1%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3059 Points ∼100% +199%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1017 Points ∼33% 0%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1022 Points ∼33% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (72 - 6524, n=89, last 2 years)
1862 Points ∼61% +82%
64 Bit Multi-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1342 Points ∼39%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1873 Points ∼55% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2009 Points ∼59% +50%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1786 Points ∼53% +33%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1780 Points ∼52% +33%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3399 Points ∼100% +153%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1332 Points ∼39% -1%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1342 Points ∼39% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (248 - 4201, n=193, last 2 years)
1896 Points ∼56% +41%
64 Bit Single-Core Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
393 Points ∼43%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
610 Points ∼66% +55%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
658 Points ∼71% +67%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
551 Points ∼60% +40%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
548 Points ∼59% +39%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
923 Points ∼100% +135%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
299 Points ∼32% -24%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
393 Points ∼43% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (58 - 1604, n=193, last 2 years)
547 Points ∼59% +39%
PCMark for Android
Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
82 Points ∼1%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8021 Points ∼78% +9682%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7547 Points ∼73% +9104%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
7737 Points ∼75% +9335%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
7913 Points ∼76% +9550%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10347 Points ∼100% +12518%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7789 Points ∼75% +9399%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
82 Points ∼1% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 15299, n=279, last 2 years)
7520 Points ∼73% +9071%
Work performance score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
12638 Points ∼100%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
10321 Points ∼82% -18%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
8853 Points ∼70% -30%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
9956 Points ∼79% -21%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
9075 Points ∼72% -28%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12129 Points ∼96% -4%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8211 Points ∼65% -35%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
12638 Points ∼100% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2689 - 19989, n=257, last 2 years)
9587 Points ∼76% -24%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
694 Points ∼22%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
809 Points ∼26% +17%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1094 Points ∼35% +58%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
552 Points ∼18% -20%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
694 Points ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (205 - 8672, n=52, last 2 years)
3127 Points ∼100% +351%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
693 Points ∼24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
821 Points ∼29% +18%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1097 Points ∼38% +58%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
564 Points ∼20% -19%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
693 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 7275, n=53, last 2 years)
2863 Points ∼100% +313%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2193 Points ∼69%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2769 Points ∼87% +26%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2864 Points ∼90% +31%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2775 Points ∼87% +27%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2862 Points ∼90% +31%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3193 Points ∼100% +46%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2298 Points ∼72% +5%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2193 Points ∼69% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1740 - 4061, n=220, last 2 years)
2629 Points ∼82% +20%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1324 Points ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1932 Points ∼23% +46%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2510 Points ∼30% +90%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2199 Points ∼27% +66%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2180 Points ∼26% +65%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8265 Points ∼100% +524%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
911 Points ∼11% -31%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1324 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (203 - 11259, n=220, last 2 years)
2943 Points ∼36% +122%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1463 Points ∼24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2081 Points ∼34% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2581 Points ∼42% +76%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2310 Points ∼38% +58%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2302 Points ∼38% +57%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6106 Points ∼100% +317%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1066 Points ∼17% -27%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1463 Points ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (253 - 6977, n=220, last 2 years)
2601 Points ∼43% +78%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2526 Points ∼46%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3374 Points ∼62% +34%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3649 Points ∼67% +44%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3391 Points ∼62% +34%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3349 Points ∼61% +33%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
5466 Points ∼100% +116%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2501 Points ∼46% -1%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2526 Points ∼46% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5780, n=280, last 2 years)
2807 Points ∼51% +11%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1352 Points ∼14%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2187 Points ∼23% +62%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2823 Points ∼30% +109%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2471 Points ∼26% +83%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2465 Points ∼26% +82%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
9466 Points ∼100% +600%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
988 Points ∼10% -27%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1352 Points ∼14% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (73 - 12616, n=280, last 2 years)
3224 Points ∼34% +138%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1504 Points ∼18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2348 Points ∼29% +56%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2973 Points ∼37% +98%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2701 Points ∼33% +80%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2619 Points ∼32% +74%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8145 Points ∼100% +442%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1123 Points ∼14% -25%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1504 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (91 - 9643, n=280, last 2 years)
2925 Points ∼36% +94%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2611 Points ∼66%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3984 Points ∼100% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3651 Points ∼92% +40%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3352 Points ∼84% +28%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3339 Points ∼84% +28%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3956 Points ∼99% +52%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2511 Points ∼63% -4%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2611 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (620 - 5765, n=278, last 2 years)
2761 Points ∼69% +6%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2032 Points ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3307 Points ∼26% +63%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4263 Points ∼34% +110%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3773 Points ∼30% +86%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3741 Points ∼30% +84%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
12547 Points ∼100% +517%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1452 Points ∼12% -29%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2032 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 22052, n=280, last 2 years)
4487 Points ∼36% +121%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2122 Points ∼25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3327 Points ∼38% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4110 Points ∼48% +94%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3704 Points ∼43% +75%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3644 Points ∼42% +72%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8652 Points ∼100% +308%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1573 Points ∼18% -26%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2122 Points ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (149 - 11895, n=280, last 2 years)
3603 Points ∼42% +70%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2643 Points ∼53%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3265 Points ∼66% +24%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3542 Points ∼71% +34%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3328 Points ∼67% +26%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3331 Points ∼67% +26%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
4958 Points ∼100% +88%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2338 Points ∼47% -12%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2643 Points ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (435 - 5318, n=274, last 2 years)
2715 Points ∼55% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1283 Points ∼15%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1982 Points ∼24% +54%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2617 Points ∼31% +104%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2293 Points ∼27% +79%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2299 Points ∼27% +79%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8365 Points ∼100% +552%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
951 Points ∼11% -26%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1283 Points ∼15% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (62 - 11573, n=274, last 2 years)
2733 Points ∼33% +113%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1442 Points ∼20%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
2198 Points ∼30% +52%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2778 Points ∼38% +93%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
2489 Points ∼34% +73%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
2469 Points ∼34% +71%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
7265 Points ∼100% +404%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1099 Points ∼15% -24%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1442 Points ∼20% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (78 - 9138, n=274, last 2 years)
2558 Points ∼35% +77%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2601 Points ∼66%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3257 Points ∼82% +25%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3523 Points ∼89% +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3349 Points ∼84% +29%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3362 Points ∼85% +29%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
3965 Points ∼100% +52%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2332 Points ∼59% -10%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2601 Points ∼66% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (607 - 5301, n=274, last 2 years)
2677 Points ∼68% +3%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2033 Points ∼18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3197 Points ∼28% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4072 Points ∼35% +100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3678 Points ∼32% +81%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3604 Points ∼31% +77%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11569 Points ∼100% +469%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1493 Points ∼13% -27%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2033 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (54 - 16670, n=274, last 2 years)
3841 Points ∼33% +89%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2182 Points ∼27%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3208 Points ∼39% +47%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2825 Points ∼34% +29%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3556 Points ∼43% +63%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3547 Points ∼43% +63%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8215 Points ∼100% +276%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1525 Points ∼19% -30%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2182 Points ∼27% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (68 - 11256, n=274, last 2 years)
3254 Points ∼40% +49%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22763 Points ∼79%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
19976 Points ∼69% -12%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20076 Points ∼69% -12%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
20382 Points ∼70% -10%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
21603 Points ∼75% -5%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
28985 Points ∼100% +27%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
12601 Points ∼43% -45%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
22763 Points ∼79% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4811 - 59268, n=248, last 2 years)
22353 Points ∼77% -2%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
27034 Points ∼18%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
44899 Points ∼31% +66%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
55911 Points ∼38% +107%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
53182 Points ∼36% +97%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
52736 Points ∼36% +95%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
146854 Points ∼100% +443%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
23224 Points ∼16% -14%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
27034 Points ∼18% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2177 - 224130, n=247, last 2 years)
53373 Points ∼36% +97%
1280x720 offscreen Ice Storm Unlimited Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
25992 Points ∼34%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
35182 Points ∼46% +35%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40032 Points ∼53% +54%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
39572 Points ∼52% +52%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
39944 Points ∼52% +54%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
76099 Points ∼100% +193%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19601 Points ∼26% -25%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
25992 Points ∼34% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2920 - 117606, n=247, last 2 years)
37471 Points ∼49% +44%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
1920x1080 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
43 fps ∼21%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
73 fps ∼36% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
90 fps ∼44% +109%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
86 fps ∼42% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
67 fps ∼33% +56%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
205 fps ∼100% +377%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
40 fps ∼20% -7%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
43 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.3 - 322, n=232, last 2 years)
93.4 fps ∼46% +117%
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
37 fps ∼62%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
58 fps ∼97% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
50 fps ∼83% +35%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
57 fps ∼95% +54%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
55 fps ∼92% +49%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +62%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
36 fps ∼60% -3%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
37 fps ∼62% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (8.2 - 143, n=232, last 2 years)
51.7 fps ∼86% +40%
GFXBench 3.0
off screen Manhattan Offscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
26 fps ∼21%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
37 fps ∼30% +42%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
45 fps ∼36% +73%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
42 fps ∼34% +62%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
34 fps ∼27% +31%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
125 fps ∼100% +381%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
19 fps ∼15% -27%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
26 fps ∼21% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1 - 180, n=231, last 2 years)
54.6 fps ∼44% +110%
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
22 fps ∼37%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
33 fps ∼55% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
40 fps ∼67% +82%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
38 fps ∼63% +73%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
31 fps ∼52% +41%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
60 fps ∼100% +173%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
15 fps ∼25% -32%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
22 fps ∼37% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.5 - 120, n=230, last 2 years)
40.3 fps ∼67% +83%
GFXBench 3.1
off screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
15 fps ∼17%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
26 fps ∼30% +73%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
33 fps ∼38% +120%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
30 fps ∼34% +100%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
24 fps ∼27% +60%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
88 fps ∼100% +487%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
13 fps ∼15% -13%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
15 fps ∼17% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.4 - 117, n=228, last 2 years)
37.3 fps ∼42% +149%
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼22%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
23 fps ∼39% +77%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
29 fps ∼49% +123%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
27 fps ∼46% +108%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
22 fps ∼37% +69%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
59 fps ∼100% +354%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.9 fps ∼13% -39%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
13 fps ∼22% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.1 - 106, n=228, last 2 years)
31.3 fps ∼53% +141%
GFXBench
Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
5.4 fps ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
8.7 fps ∼30% +61%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
11 fps ∼38% +104%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
10 fps ∼34% +85%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
8.3 fps ∼29% +54%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
29 fps ∼100% +437%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4.4 fps ∼15% -19%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
5.4 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.1 - 60, n=278, last 2 years)
13.3 fps ∼46% +146%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
3.7 fps ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
5.8 fps ∼29% +57%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7.4 fps ∼37% +100%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6.3 fps ∼32% +70%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
5.4 fps ∼27% +46%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
20 fps ∼100% +441%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2.8 fps ∼14% -24%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
3.7 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.26 - 101, n=277, last 2 years)
9.17 fps ∼46% +148%
Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
11 fps ∼24%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼30% +27%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
17 fps ∼37% +55%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼35% +45%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
13 fps ∼28% +18%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
46 fps ∼100% +318%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
6.7 fps ∼15% -39%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
11 fps ∼24% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 66, n=279, last 2 years)
20 fps ∼43% +82%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.8 fps ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
15 fps ∼28% +70%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
20 fps ∼37% +127%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
18 fps ∼33% +105%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
15 fps ∼28% +70%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
54 fps ∼100% +514%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.6 fps ∼14% -14%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
8.8 fps ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.94 - 257, n=279, last 2 years)
22.9 fps ∼42% +160%
off screen Car Chase Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13 fps ∼25%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
14 fps ∼27% +8%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
19 fps ∼37% +46%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
17 fps ∼33% +31%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
14 fps ∼27% +8%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
51 fps ∼100% +292%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
8.1 fps ∼16% -38%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
13 fps ∼25% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.89 - 75, n=227, last 2 years)
22.4 fps ∼44% +72%
on screen Car Chase Onscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
8.5 fps ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
13 fps ∼30% +53%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
16 fps ∼36% +88%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
16 fps ∼36% +88%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
12 fps ∼27% +41%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
44 fps ∼100% +418%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
7.1 fps ∼16% -16%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
8.5 fps ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1.5 - 60, n=227, last 2 years)
19.6 fps ∼45% +131%
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
203961 Points ∼36%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
282385 Points ∼50% +38%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
331554 Points ∼58% +63%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
251673 Points ∼44% +23%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
247877 Points ∼43% +22%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
569967 Points ∼100% +179%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
169704 Points ∼30% -17%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
203961 Points ∼36% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (53335 - 727247, n=166, last 2 years)
328950 Points ∼58% +61%
VRMark - Amber Room (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1552 Score ∼51%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1899 Score ∼63% +22%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2568 Score ∼85% +65%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1221 Score ∼40% -21%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1552 Score ∼51% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (421 - 7649, n=58, last 2 years)
3017 Score ∼100% +94%
AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4726 Points ∼10%
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
0 Points ∼0% -100%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4989 Points ∼10% +6%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4989 Points ∼10% +6%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4489 Points ∼9% -5%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
  (0 - 4726, n=2)
2363 Points ∼5% -50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4293 - 228879, n=38, last 2 years)
48091 Points ∼100% +918%
Basemark GPU 1.2
Vulkan Medium Native (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
13.26 (4.93min - 27.347max) fps ∼49%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
23.36 fps ∼87% +76%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14.21 (4.78min - 28.84max) fps ∼53% +7%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
13.3 fps ∼49% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10.5 - 61.5, n=31, last 2 years)
27 fps ∼100% +104%
1920x1080 Vulkan Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
16.43 (4.23min - 31.34max) fps ∼50%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.85 (12.92min - 52.46max) fps ∼70% +39%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
26.49 fps ∼81% +61%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16.03 (5.56min - 43.21max) fps ∼49% -2%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
16.4 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5.23 - 84.4, n=32, last 2 years)
32.6 fps ∼100% +98%
1280x720 Vulkan Simple Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
106.4 (33.66min - 598.43max) fps ∼54%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
198.56 (77.43min - 1345.87max) fps ∼100% +87%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
194.39 fps ∼98% +83%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
112.32 (41.21min - 654.22max) fps ∼57% +6%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
106 fps ∼53% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (29.8 - 452, n=28, last 2 years)
197 fps ∼99% +85%
OpenGL Medium Native (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
fps ∼0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
20.52 (11.64min - 35.95max) fps ∼71%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
24.34 fps ∼85%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
14.32 (7.44min - 24.67max) fps ∼50%
Average of class Smartphone
  (5 - 67.2, n=32, last 2 years)
28.7 fps ∼100%
1920x1080 OpenGL Medium Offscreen (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
16.35 (8.53min - 45.12max) fps ∼50%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
22.91 (13.01min - 32.04max) fps ∼70% +40%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
27.32 fps ∼83% +67%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
16.3 (7.51min - 30.54max) fps ∼50% 0%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
16.4 fps ∼50% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4.63 - 98.8, n=34, last 2 years)
32.8 fps ∼100% +101%
BaseMark OS II
Web (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1334 Points ∼92%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
1354 Points ∼93% +1%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1422 Points ∼98% +7%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
1347 Points ∼93% +1%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
1366 Points ∼94% +2%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
1456 Points ∼100% +9%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1023 Points ∼70% -23%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1334 Points ∼92% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (10 - 2169, n=217, last 2 years)
1196 Points ∼82% -10%
Graphics (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1834 Points ∼16%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3321 Points ∼28% +81%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3947 Points ∼34% +115%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3984 Points ∼34% +117%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3875 Points ∼33% +111%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
11736 Points ∼100% +540%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
1572 Points ∼13% -14%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1834 Points ∼16% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (186 - 16996, n=217, last 2 years)
4953 Points ∼42% +170%
Memory (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
1725 Points ∼19%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
4297 Points ∼48% +149%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4687 Points ∼53% +172%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
4029 Points ∼45% +134%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
4482 Points ∼51% +160%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
8874 Points ∼100% +414%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2772 Points ∼31% +61%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
1725 Points ∼19% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (434 - 9044, n=217, last 2 years)
3818 Points ∼43% +121%
System (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
4403 Points ∼44%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
6617 Points ∼66% +50%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7033 Points ∼70% +60%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
6612 Points ∼66% +50%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
6606 Points ∼66% +50%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
10075 Points ∼100% +129%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
4934 Points ∼49% +12%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
4403 Points ∼44% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1160 - 14189, n=217, last 2 years)
6124 Points ∼61% +39%
Overall (sort by value)
ZTE Axon 20
UNISOC Tiger T618, Mali-G52 MP2, 6144
2033 Points ∼32%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 5G, Adreno 619L, 6144
3387 Points ∼54% +67%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3688 Points ∼59% +81%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G, Adreno 618, 4096
3412 Points ∼54% +68%
Samsung Galaxy M51
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730, Adreno 618, 6144
3539 Points ∼56% +74%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865, Adreno 650, 6144
6273 Points ∼100% +209%
Huawei P Smart 2021
HiSilicon Kirin 710A, Mali-G51 MP4, 4096
2173 Points ∼35% +7%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
 
2033 Points ∼32% 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (179 - 6959, n=217, last 2 years)
3286 Points ∼52% +62%
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
67.698 Points ∼100% +64%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
52.656 Points ∼78% +28%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
50.582 Points ∼75% +23%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
50.111 Points ∼74% +22%
Average of class Smartphone (12.4 - 161, n=195, last 2 years)
46.4 Points ∼69% +13%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
41.23 Points ∼61%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
41.2 Points ∼61% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
16.421 Points ∼24% -60%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
119.9 Points ∼100% +90%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
93.023 Points ∼78% +47%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
86.541 Points ∼72% +37%
Average of class Smartphone (10.8 - 375, n=201, last 2 years)
82.1 Points ∼68% +30%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
66.339 Points ∼55% +5%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
63.23 Points ∼53%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
63.2 Points ∼53% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
23.745 Points ∼20% -62%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
74.5 runs/min ∼100% +124%
Average of class Smartphone (9 - 196, n=174, last 2 years)
47.7 runs/min ∼64% +43%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
46.2 runs/min ∼62% +39%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
43.3 runs/min ∼58% +30%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chome 85)
41.3 runs/min ∼55% +24%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
33.3 runs/min ∼45%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
33.3 runs/min ∼45% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
13.3 runs/min ∼18% -60%
WebXPRT 3 - ---
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
103 Points ∼100% +51%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
76 Points ∼74% +12%
Average of class Smartphone (19 - 194, n=216, last 2 years)
74.6 Points ∼72% +10%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
69 Points ∼67% +1%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
68 Points ∼66% 0%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
68 Points ∼66%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
68 Points ∼66% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
29 Points ∼28% -57%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
24369 Points ∼100% +103%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
17809 Points ∼73% +48%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
16729 Points ∼69% +39%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
16399 Points ∼67% +36%
Average of class Smartphone (1986 - 58632, n=227, last 2 years)
15671 Points ∼64% +30%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
12022 Points ∼49%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
12022 Points ∼49% 0%
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
4395 Points ∼18% -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score
OnePlus Nord N10 5G (Chrome 87)
12192.2 ms * ∼100% -255%
Average of class Smartphone (460 - 29635, n=228, last 2 years)
4665 ms * ∼38% -36%
ZTE Axon 20 (Chrome 87)
3432.4 ms * ∼28%
Average UNISOC Tiger T618
3432 ms * ∼28% -0%
Motorola Moto G9 Plus (Chrome 86)
2783.1 ms * ∼23% +19%
Samsung Galaxy M51 (Chrome 85)
2773.8 ms * ∼23% +19%
Xiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5G (Chrome 87.0.4280.101)
2622.8 ms * ∼22% +24%
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro (Chrome84)
1993.1 ms * ∼16% +42%

* ... smaller is better

ZTE Axon 20OnePlus Nord N10 5GXiaomi Mi 10T Lite 5GMotorola Moto G9 PlusSamsung Galaxy M51Xiaomi Poco F2 ProAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
361%
519%
287%
305%
1191%
121%
319%
Sequential Write 256KB SDCard
62.42 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
64.9 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
4%
65.82 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
65.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
5%
59.4 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-5%
62.5 (26.1 - 81.9, n=33)
0%
59 (1.7 - 83.3, n=205, last 2 years)
-5%
Sequential Read 256KB SDCard
80.39 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
86.5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
87.02 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
8%
85.3 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
6%
74.8 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501)
-7%
78 (29.2 - 154, n=33)
-3%
76.8 (13.4 - 154, n=205, last 2 years)
-4%
Random Write 4KB
9.56
106.01
1009%
162.33
1598%
98.12
926%
114.5
1098%
226.45
2269%
44.3 (8.48 - 151, n=36)
363%
101 (4.31 - 319, n=286, last 2 years)
956%
Random Read 4KB
25.35
136.98
440%
176.59
597%
134.77
432%
123.6
388%
229.74
806%
76.2 (20.7 - 247, n=36)
201%
122 (13.5 - 325, n=286, last 2 years)
381%
Sequential Write 256KB
202.34
187.24
-7%
463.5
129%
186.23
-8%
189.8
-6%
721.95
257%
191 (90 - 314, n=36)
-6%
287 (11.9 - 1321, n=286, last 2 years)
42%
Sequential Read 256KB
106.67
865.23
711%
938.14
779%
489.37
359%
491.7
361%
1634.45
1432%
288 (107 - 501, n=36)
170%
685 (41.9 - 2037, n=286, last 2 years)
542%

Games - Axon 20 only conditionally suitable for gaming

The Mali G52 MP2 integrated in the Unisoc SoC sometimes reaches its limits in complex 3D games from the Android Play Store. PUBG Mobile is rendered with up to 40 fps in low graphics. Asphalt 9 can also be played smoothly on an Axon 20 with low details for the most part, but short drops in the frame rate have to be accepted again and again.

Older games, such as Dead Trigger 2, can even be played with high graphics at 60 fps - we determine the frame rate with the app Gamebench. The sensors and the touchscreen do not give reason for criticism during our gaming tests.

PUBG
PUBG
Asphalt 9
Asphalt 9
Dead Trigger 2
Dead Trigger 2
PUBG mobile
0510152025303540403940404040384139404039404039404040404040403841404039404040404040403940413940414039413940404040404041</