Teclast T40 HD tablet review – The budget tablet with lots of fast storage and mobile data
The Chinese company Teclast offers a large selection of inexpensive tablets, most featuring lots of storage and a large battery, allowing you to take plenty of photos and videos on the device which you can look back on for a long time.
The Teclast T40 HD is also equipped with these features: For just over US$200, you get 128 GB of storage, a large 7,200 mAh and it even gives you the option to make calls or surf the web using a SIM card. If anything, its comparatively slow processor makes us worry a little.
In this review, we will be taking a closer look at the tablet while trying to find out whether the competition can keep up with its extensive features — or whether it might actually be capable of more.
Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team! Wanted:
- News translator (DE-EN)
- Review translation proofreader (DE-EN)
Details here
Possible competitors compared
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.3 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2024 | Teclast T40 HD T7200, Mali-G57 MP1 | 462 g | 7.7 mm | 10.36" | 2000x1200 | |
79.9 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Teclast M50 Pro T7255, Mali-G57 MP1 | 435 g | 7.9 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 477 g | 7 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 | |
80 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 T610, Mali-G52 MP2 | 460 g | 8.5 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2023 | Huawei MatePad SE SD 680, Adreno 610 | 440 g | 7.9 mm | 10.40" | 2000x1200 |
Case – Attractive metal case
The tablet has a metal unibody case in the color Space Gray — when it comes to colorings, the manufacturer has clearly taken a leaf out of Apple's book. Its brushed back gives it a high-quality feel and a small plastic strip along the top next to the cameras allows for adequate signal strength for the antennas.
Its case is built nicely and can repel pressure well. However, you can hear a clear creaking noise when you twist the device — almost as if connections are opening and snapping back into place. With a weight of 460 grams, the Teclast T40 HD does well within the comparison field. For its size, it is neither extraordinarily heavy nor is it as light as a feather.
Its footprint is also average for its size. The tablet's bezels aren't terribly slim, but this allows you to hold it without accidentally activating the touchscreen.
Connectivity – Lots of space for files
Within this price class, 128 GB of storage and 8 GB RAM are classed as plentiful.
Its USB-C port is connected using the USB-2.0 standard, so its wired data transfers aren't faster than on other devices and it isn't possible to output picture using this connection. It doesn't feature NFC support.
Thanks to its 3.5-mm jack, you can connect headphones and speakers without needing to occupy the USB-C port.
On the right side of the bottom of the tablet's case, you will find a slot which accommodates up to 2 SIM cards or one SIM and one microSD, letting you expand its storage.
microSD card reader
The Teclast T40 HD accepts microSD cards with up to 1 TB of storage. We tested the reader using our Angelbird V60 reference card.
During the copying test, whereby 250 photos are transferred from the SD card onto the tablet's internal storage, the Teclast T40 HD did quite well, achieving 34.3 MB/s. This makes it easy to store data, as it can access the microSD card quickly.
The reader also showed itself as being quite speedy in the CPDT benchmark.
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Teclast T40 HD (Angelbird V60) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Angelbird V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Angelbird V60) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Software – Stock Android with infrequent updates
The manufacturer has installed Android 13 onto the tablet and it has hardly changed anything about Google's operating system. It comes with no sponsored and barely any additional apps preinstalled, meaning you can decide to fill the device's storage space however you like.
At the time of testing, the latest security patch was from August 2023 — a while ago. Upon asking about how long the manufacturer is set to supply the tablet with updates, Teclast said it was still working on this and will supposedly publish a list soon. You can currently expect infrequent updates for 2 to 3 years. You would assume the tablet will see Android 14, but this hasn't yet been confirmed.
Thanks to its Widevine L1 support, you can enjoy HD streaming from all the major providers.
Communication and GNSS – Even with mobile data
WiFi 5 is the fastest WLAN standard mastered by the Teclast tablet — in our test using the Asus ROG Rapture AXE11000 as a reference router, it achieved values of around 306 to 358 MBit/s, making it average for this class. All-in-all, its transfer rates remained quite stable.
Close to the router, websites are loaded quickly and with a distance of 10 metres to the router with 3 walls in between, you still have access to 3/4 of the original signal. Websites are still loaded quickly but you can feel that its transfer rates aren't quite as high.
You can also make use of cellular networks up to 4G in order to access the internet on the go or to make calls. The Teclast T40 HD has good reception, however, it can't keep up with high-end phones. Within the city, we managed to connect to the network for the entirety of our test.
Networking | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast T40 HD | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 |
We analyzed how accurate the Teclast T40 HD's satellite location services are, as the tablet supports all major locating networks. If you step outside, you are faced with rather long waiting times before being located with an accuracy of 9 metres. This hints at the Teclast pad not being the most accurate at locating.
This was confirmed during our practical test — a bike trip — during which we took the Garmin Venu 2 smartwatch with us to compare. The Teclast T40 HD may have managed to record the turning point relatively accurately, however, it showed major deviations when it came to tight alleyways and crossing the bridge. As a result, the test device is only suitable for navigation purposes if you don't have to rely on good accuracy.
Cameras – Usable, but not the best
As is the case with most tablets, the Teclast T40 HD's focus doesn't lie on camera quality. As a result, the device features quite a simple 13-megapixel lens on the back, as well as a 0.3-megapixel lens which can't be used to take photos on its own.
The resulting photos have quite a heavy blue tint, are overexposed in lighter areas, show barely any details and large areas are often depicted as being somewhat blotchy. In low lighting conditions, images are missing some dynamics. In total, its picture sharpness is fine and for the occasional snapshot in good lighting conditions, the camera works just fine.
Videos can be recorded at a maximum of 1080p and 30 fps. When doing so, the autofocus sometimes takes its time and can be seen pumping. Its picture quality is okay.
The front of the tablet has a selfie cam with a resolution of 8 megapixels. Even in good lighting conditions, we noted some color tints. The level of detail and sharpness are fine, meaning you can definitely use the camera as long as your expectations regarding quality aren't all too high.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera plantMain camera surroundingsMain camera low lightIn our photo lab, we photographed a test chart and color chart under controlled lighting conditions and using the main camera on the back of the device. We did this once in full studio lighting and once at only 1 lux. In low light, the camera can barely capture any image information and in good lighting conditions (as seen earlier), we noted color tints and some areas aren't depicted very cleanly.
Accessories and warranty – Folio case available
The tablet's scope of delivery includes a power supply, USB cable as well as a tool for opening the SIM/microSD slot. Teclast also offers a folio case which can be purchased on its website.
The manufacturer only gives this device a 12-month warranty and it has recommended to refer to the point of purchase.
Input devices & operation – No fingerprint sensor
The Teclast T40 HD's touchscreen doesn't offer refresh rates over 60 Hz. Still, the display is pretty precise, right into the corners and along the edges.
Its power button and volume rocker can also be operated reliably.
The T40 HD doesn't feature a fingerprint sensor. In turn, you can unlock the device via facial recognition using the front-facing camera. Once learned, faces are recognized reliably and the tablet is unlocked speedily. However, pure 2D facial recognition isn't quite as safe and can be overridden using masks or pictures.
Display – High-res, but with a color tint
The tablet's IPS display measures 10.36 inches in diameter and has a resolution of 2,000 x 1,200 pixels. It is large enough to depict images without any visible pixels. With an average maximum brightness of 346 cd/m², the screen is quite bright for the price class but in total, it is still more suited for indoor use.
The colors seem rather muted, which fans of natural depiction will like. At the same time, it does have quite a hefty red tint, as identified during our tests using a spectral photometer and the CalMAN software. We also noted that the screen doesn't depict colors (especially light green and blue tones) very accurately. All-in-all, we wouldn't recommend using the screen to evaluate print colors.
The display doesn't need PWM, so sensitive users should be able to use the Teclast T40 HD with no issues.
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 12.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 918:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.54 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.169
Teclast T40 HD IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Teclast M50 Pro IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1" | Huawei MatePad SE IPS, 2000x1200, 10.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 9% | -3% | 10% | 24% | |
Brightness middle | 367 | 248 -32% | 322 -12% | 343 -7% | 398 8% |
Brightness | 346 | 234 -32% | 303 -12% | 332 -4% | 368 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 89 -1% | 94 4% | 87 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.2 50% | 0.45 -13% | 0.31 22% | 0.46 -15% |
Contrast | 918 | 1240 35% | 716 -22% | 1106 20% | 865 -6% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.54 | 5.3 19% | 7.02 -7% | 5.9 10% | 2.17 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.53 | 11.95 18% | 10.38 29% | 11.2 23% | 4.32 70% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.7 | 7.1 18% | 7.1 18% | 7.9 9% | 3.1 64% |
Gamma | 2.169 101% | 2.327 95% | 2.179 101% | 2.184 101% | 2.214 99% |
CCT | 7952 82% | 8112 80% | 8730 74% | 9198 71% | 7245 90% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
27.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.8 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26.2 ms rise | |
↘ 17.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
On bright days, the screen's brightness is barely enough for it to remain legible. In the shade, you can also use the tablet outdoors from time to time.
The screen's good viewing angles mean that you can read from it from any angle — even really flat ones.
Performance – Could be better
The Teclast T40 HD's Unisoc T60 is quite a weak SoC. As a result, the tablet fell behind in many benchmarks compared to the comparison devices. At the same time, the differences are usually not so big that you would notice them a lot in day-to-day use. According to our benchmarks, the tablet also isn't the best at AI calculations.
If you are only looking to use your T40 HD for simple tasks, then you shouldn't have any problems: Even using split-screen mode, many apps still run smoothly. However, you will be faced with some short waiting times every now and then.
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Tablet (1662 - 74821, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (2678 - 3748, n=7) | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 |
The graphics unit, on the other hand, is barely good enough even for simple 3D uses and using the screen's full resolution. It only starts to appear smoother when you reduce the resolution.
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast T40 HD |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast T40 HD |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast T40 HD |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast T40 HD |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD |
When surfing the web, our test device isn't actually all too bad — it often loads pages quite quickly. You may have to wait for images to load sometimes but in total, the Teclast T40 HD is a speedy surfer.
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120) | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (38.1 - 52.9, n=8) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (51 - 56, n=7) | |
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (70 - 86, n=4) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (31.2 - 52.1, n=7) | |
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chome 112) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chome 111) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) | |
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (2228 - 13455, n=14) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MatePad SE (Huawei Browser 12) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 (Chrome 111) | |
Average Unisoc T7200 (2904 - 3187, n=7) | |
Teclast T40 HD (Chrome 120) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 (Chrome 112) | |
Teclast M50 Pro (Chrome 117.0.5938.60) |
* ... smaller is better
Its 128 GB UFS 2.0 storage is something special for this price class — in terms of size as well as speed. Data transfers are accelerated thanks to the fast flash and loading times are kept shorter than on many other devices within this price range.
Teclast T40 HD | Teclast M50 Pro | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | Huawei MatePad SE | Average 128 GB UFS 2.0 Flash | Average of class Tablet | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -32% | -58% | -29% | -55% | -11% | 98% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 688.9 | 257.8 -63% | 249 -64% | 277.2 -60% | 293.6 -57% | 530 ? -23% | 1055 ? 53% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 188 | 225.22 20% | 83 -56% | 210.4 12% | 99.5 -47% | 212 ? 13% | 692 ? 268% |
Random Read 4KB | 137 | 91.95 -33% | 67.3 -51% | 105.1 -23% | 61.8 -55% | 130.6 ? -5% | 191 ? 39% |
Random Write 4KB | 143.8 | 68.13 -53% | 58.8 -59% | 78.5 -45% | 54 -62% | 101.2 ? -30% | 191.4 ? 33% |
Games – Suited for simple games
Unfortunately, the Teclast tablet doesn't get along well with the software from GameBench, meaning we aren't able to deliver any fps rates. In any way, you can barely manage to run demanding games at more than 30 fps — this is mostly not even offered by games.
Controlling games via the touchscreen and the location sensor works nice and precisely.
Emissions – The tablet hardly heats up
Temperature
Even under longer periods of processor load, the device's case barely heats up and it isn't noticeable at all.
Subsequently, it is no wonder that the SoC had no issues keeping its performance stable and high during the 3DMark stress tests.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 20.8 °C / 69 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Teclast T40 HD | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Huawei MatePad SE | |
Teclast M50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 | |
Teclast T40 HD |
Speakers
The Teclast T40 HD's stereo speakers don't get particularly loud and at maximum volume, the sound pierces your ears a little uncomfortably.
Sound seems a little imprecise but voices are played back clearly. The same can be said for singing which is very present and clear. However, playback precision leaves a lot to be desired when it comes to quite a few instruments — but for casual listening, the speakers are usable.
External headphones or speakers can be connected using Bluetooth or the 3.5-mm jack. This works perfectly and the tablet has access to HiRes audio codecs for wireless connections (aptX HD & LDAC).
Teclast T40 HD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 72% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 21% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MatePad SE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 75% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Power management – The Teclast tablet has stamina
Power consumption
In total, the Teclast T40 Pro's power consumption is quite low and in particular, it boasts relatively low consumption under load.
The tablet can be charged at a maximum of 10 watts which, due to its large battery, can take up to 4 hours to complete.
Off / Standby | 0.1 / 0.2 Watt |
Idle | 1.2 / 1.3 / 1.5 Watt |
Load |
2.9 / 5.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Teclast T40 HD 7200 mAh | Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -33% | -36% | -83% | -82% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.2 | 1.1 8% | 1.4 -17% | 1.9 -58% | 1.5 -25% |
Idle Average * | 1.3 | 1.4 -8% | 1.6 -23% | 2.1 -62% | 2.3 -77% |
Idle Maximum * | 1.5 | 1.9 -27% | 2 -33% | 2.5 -67% | 2.8 -87% |
Load Average * | 2.9 | 5.5 -90% | 4.2 -45% | 7.6 -162% | 6.5 -124% |
Load Maximum * | 5.4 | 8 -48% | 8.7 -61% | 9 -67% | 10.7 -98% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Runtimes
Its battery with a generous capacity of 7,200 mAh proves to be very long-lasting and it managed to beat the similarly priced comparison devices. It lasted 15:02 hours when surfing via WLAN and you can play movies from the flash memory for almost 18 hours before the screen goes out.
If you like gaming, you can still get 4:24 hours of runtime under very high load if there is no power socket nearby.
Teclast T40 HD 7200 mAh | Teclast M50 Pro 6000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A7 LTE 2022 7040 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 Gen 3 5100 mAh | Huawei MatePad SE 5100 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -34% | -3% | -14% | -18% | |
Reader / Idle | 2688 | 1660 -38% | 2869 7% | 1952 -27% | 2009 -25% |
H.264 | 1067 | 579 -46% | 942 -12% | 1002 -6% | 958 -10% |
WiFi v1.3 | 902 | 555 -38% | 874 -3% | 861 -5% | 638 -29% |
Load | 264 | 233 -12% | 250 -5% | 213 -19% | 249 -6% |
Pros
Cons
Verdict – Affordable and well-equipped
For a price of just over US$200, the Teclast T40 HD makes a decent impression: Its passable speakers, long runtimes and its Widevine L1 support all make the tablet a great companion for streaming and movie nights. The device comes with plenty of fast storage, a high-resolution and somewhat bright screen, as well as the option to use cellular data for calls or to surf the web on the go.
Even so, the Teclast T40 HD likes being indoors more than it does being outside: On bright days, its screen isn't quite bright enough, its speakers aren't loud enough to drown out ambient noise, and its location services are a bit inaccurate.
Its cameras are usable for snapshots or scanning documents — however, as is the same with all cheaper tablets, you can't expect the same picture quality as can be achieved on expensive smartphones. Its software support is rather rudimentary, too, and you will have to make do with quite a short 12-month warranty.
A sleek metal case and extensive features (including lots of fast storage and a cellular modem) all make the Teclast T40 HD an interesting device within its price class.
If you don't place much importance on battery life but are on the hunt for more performance and better sound, then you should take a look at the Teclast M50 Pro. On the other hand, the Lenovo Tab M10 2022 (Gen 3) also supports LTE, but you'll have to settle for an older version of Android.
Price and availability
While the Teclast T40 HD is not yet available to purchase on Amazon, you can find the manufacturer's other models here. The T40 HD retails for just over US$200.
Teclast T40 HD
- 12/30/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.